brett kimberlin motion to intervene 01 (ocr)

8/2/2019 Brett Kimberlin Motion to Intervene 01 (OCR)

1/12


2/12

his readers to "get out the popcprn" to watch how he would destroy VictimHe did all this using a pseudonym, "Aaron Worthing Esq,"

3 Victim could not locate any listing for an attorney named Aaron Worthing sohe sought assistance from the Montgomery CountyCircuit Court to ascertainthe real identity ofMr. Worthing prior to a court hearing set for January 9,2012, However, several days prior to the hearing, Victim learned thatAaronWorthing was actually Aaron Walker

4 Victim then filed a motion in the court dismissing as moot his motion to

compel the identity of Mr Worthing/Walker,5, On January 9, 2012, Mr, Walker showed up at the hearing andmade an.. -emergencyoral motiontosealVictlm'smotion identifyinghim as Aaron

Walker. He argued that since he (as Aaron Worthing) was the publisher ofaMuslim hate blog called Everyone Draw Mohammed, he would be killed byMuslims if theyknew he was reallyAaron Walker Judge Rupp was takenaback byMr, Walker's appearance in the Cilse but did grilnt Mr. Walker'smotion to seal the motion However, even after the judge told Mr Walker tosit in the spectator section, Mr. Walker continued to interject until Judge Ruppwarned him that sheriff deputies would escort him from the courtroom ifhecontinued.

6 As Victim was exiting the courtroom, Mr, Walker began beratingVictim foridentifying him and said that he would continue to harass Victim As Victimexited the courtroom doors, Mr, Walker becamemore irate and began makingthreateningmoves toward Victim including coming towilrd Victim. Therefore,


3/12


4/12

11WhenVictim arrived a Suburban Hospital, he was immediately admitted tothe Emergency Ward and quickly evaluated and taken for a CT scan, given eye

exams, given medication for both pain and for contusion to the eye Victimwas kept under observation for several hours and then released with ordersto rest for several days and to take steroids eye drops for one week. He wasalso ordered to get a follow-up evaluation from his primary care physician,

12 Victim suffered a black eye from second-degree assault It lasted throughoutthe week Exhibit B

13 Victim did seek follow"up care, and was given an EKG and more Xrays due topain in the chest area

14:VicnmwaSurlilbTeEowork during the week ofJanuary 9th due to his injuriesand his medical care.

15.Mr Walker responded to Victim's legal filings in the following retaliatoryways: (1) he filed a malicious criminal charge against Victim for perjury, (2)he filed a false andmalicious Peace Order application against a third partynamed Neal Rauhauser, and falsely told the sheriff that he lived at Victim'saddress (when he had never even visited Victim's home) which caused threesheriffs to come to Victim's home to serve Mr Rauhauser, (3) he filed afrivolous and malicious $66,000,000 lawsuit againstVictim and two others,which has since been served onVictim, (4) he used Twitter to attackVictim indozens oftweets, and (5) he blogged thatVictim is "human filth" and toldpeople, as an attorney, that if they donate to Victim's non"profits, theywould


5/12

be liable for criminal and civil consequences because Victim exposed his realname.

16 When Mr Walker appeared on February 8,2012 for Victim's Peace Orderhearing for his assault, he told the judge that he did not assault Victim butrather took the iPad without incidentbecause he thought it might be a"bomb." He said that Victim must have ended up in Suburban HospitalEmergency Room with injuriesby having someone else beatVictim up soVictim could file false assault charges against him. Asheriff deputy testifiedat the hearing thatVictim stated thatMr Walker had assaultedVictimimmediately after the attack and that he had to take my iPad awayfrom Mr.Walker, and anotl"lercleputYshowed the judge the incident report from thatassault which said the same, Victim presented the judge with evidence of Mr.Walker's harassment of Victim as noted in paragraph 15 above After hearingall the eVidence, the Judge found, by clear and convincing evidence, that MrWalker had assaulted and harassed Victim, and the judge issued a final PeaceOrder prohibiting Mr. Walkerfrom further harassing Victim Exhibit C.

17, When Mr Walker appeared on February 16, 2012 for his Peace Order hearingagainst Mr. Rauhauser, at which Mr. Rauhauser did not even appear, Mr.Walker engaged in a most bizarre statement ofeventstellingthe judge that heneeded a Peace Order because, according to him, Mr, Rauhauser postedsomething called "Kookpopolis" on the Internetwhich contained three items, - a map ofManassas, Virginia, a map of Boston, Massachusetts, and abeheading video in a foreign language He begged the judge to see these as a


6/12

threat to Mr. Walker since he lived in Manassas, a client lived inMassachusetts, and Muslims behead people The judge was incredulous, evenat one point askingMr. Walker if he was really an attorney. Finally, the judgesaid that even withoutMr Rauhauser present to defend himself; she wasgoing to find thatMr Walker failed tomeet the statutory burden necessary forissuance of a Peace Order. ExhibitD.

18. The criminal charge that Mr. Walker filed against Victim did not even result insummons or make it past the screeners at the DistrictAttotney's office.ExhibitE

19.Mr. Walker has stalked, assaulted and harassed Victim because ofVictim'sW o r k a s D i r e c t o r o f a M a l ' y f ~ i i ( r b a s e d n a t i o n a l non-profit that, inter alia,supports Muslim activists, musicians and artists opposed to violence andoppression. Mr. Walker runs a Muslim hate blog, which has over 800 viledepictions of the Prophet Mohammed on it to insult Muslims. He uses thatblog to taunt Muslims by calling them "bitches" and telling them to come toManassas, Virginia so he can engage in a gun battle with them (of course heused his false name for such taunts). Mr. Walker's criterion for posting adepiction of ProphetMohammed is whether it is "fatwah-worthy," meaningwhether a Muslim cleric would issue a fatwah (edict) condemning to death theperson(s) who create and published the depiction

20. Facebook has banned Mr Walker and his hate blog from Facebook becausetheypromote hate against a religion. The Pakistan government has bannedthe blog because it blasphemes the ProphetMohammed The State


7/12

Department has condemned the blogbecause it creates anti-Americansentiment Osama Bin Laden has used to the blogto recruit suicide bombersto kill Americans in Afghanistan

21 Victim has talked to the Southern Law Poverty Center ("SLPC") aboutMr.Walker's hate blog and his team ofMuslim haters SLPC is in the process ofnaming them as a hate organization that uses bullying, intimidation, threatsand violence to secure their goals,

22, Victim has talked and metwith numerous civil rights and national Muslimorganizations about Mr, Walker's conduct, his hate blog, his malicious andcriminal conduct, and his attempt to gag Victim. TheyviewMr. Walker'sconduct,hateolog ami associates as similar to thafof tileX'd KliixKlaiiand areconsidering a broad se t oflegal actions, both criminal and civil, to dismantlethe operation.

23, IfVictim were a member of the Muslim faith, this case would be considered ahate crime under both state and federal law

Aggravating FactorsThere are numerous aggravating factors in this case thatwarrant robust

prosecution on Mr Walker.24 Mr. Walker is an attorney. Attorneys are bound by the Rules of ProfessionalConduct to act in a professional and ethical manner. Yet he came fromVirginia to Maryland and assaulted Victim after stalking, har assing,threatening, insulting, defaming, and disparagingVictim for months,


8/12

25. MI'. Walker assaulted Victim in a courthouse-a placewhere Victim went toseek redress ofgrievances and where he had a right to be secure and safe

26. MI'. Walker made no amends following the assault, no apology and showed nocontrition Instead, he revictimized Victim by filing (1) a false criminalcharge against Victim, (2) a false Peace Order against Neal Rauhauser in orderto have the Sheriff come to Victim's home to startle and harass Victim, and (3)a malicious $66,000,000 suit against Victim

27. Following the assault, Mr. Walker doubled down on the harassment bymaking dozens ofdisparaging tweets aboutVictim, by urging other bloggersto attackVictim, by blogging thatVictim is "human filth," and by threatening

28. Mr Walker has repeatedly lied to every court about his conduct by attemptingto blame Victim He said thatVictim made the whole thing up He said that hethought the iPad was a bomh He said that Victim must have had someonebeat him up so he could go to the hospital He said that he never touchedVictim He falsely accused Victim of crimes He falsely accused NealRauhauser ofcrimes in order to harass Victim.

ConclusionFor all the above reasons, Victim moves this Court to deny the State's nolle pros

motion and to order a trial in this case.Respectfully submitted,

Brett Kimbe

.. _ - - . _ - - - - ~ . , - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - -


9/12

Certificate of ServiceI certify I personally served Assistant DistrictAttomey Margaret Schweitzer and

served Reginald Bours by US Mail this 19th day ofMarch, 2012


10/12


11/12


12/12

.5 DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR M O N T G O M E ~ ~ m ! ! ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ I ~ I ; ~ D I I I." 191 EAST JEFFERSON ST, ROCKVILLE, MD 20850 Case No 0601 SP005392012Date: 0210812012 10:46 am

BRETT KIMBERLINE vs AARON WALKERFINAl. PEACE ORDER

After the appearance of the PETI f10NER, and RESPONDENT, and in consideration of the Pelttion andevidence,the Court makes the following findings:A 1 That there is clear and convincing evidence that within 30 days before the filing of the Petition, theRespondent committed the following act(s):Harassment

2 That there is clear and convincing evidence that Respondent is likely to commit a prohibited act in the futureagainst the PetitionerBased on the foregoing, the Court hereby ORDERS:1 Unless stated otherwise below, this Order is effective until 08/08/20122, That the Respondent SHALL NOT commit or threaten to commit any of the foiloWing acts against Petitioner;an act which causes .serious bodily harm; an act that places the Petitioner in fear of imminent serious bodilyharm: assauit; rape, attempted rape, sexual offense, or attempted sexual offense; false imprisonment;harassment; stalking; lrespass;br malicious destruction of property3 That the Respondent SHALL NOT contact (in person, by telephone, in writing, or by any other means),attempt to contact, or harass the Petitioner4 That the Respondent SHALL NOT enter the residence of BRETT KIMElERUNE atWHEREVER LOCATED(Residence includes yard, grounds, outbuildings, and common areas surrounding the dwelling)

5 That the Respondent SHALL STAY AWAY from;The Petitioner's place(s) of employment at:WHEREVER LOCATED

Date: 0210812012NOTICE TO RESPONDENTViolation of this Peace Order may be a crime or contempt of court or both, and could result in imprisonment or fine or both

PC/PO 3 (Rev. 12/2004) Page 1

brett kimberlin motion to intervene 01 (ocr)

Documents