big sky regional carbon sequestration partnership – kevin ... · reservoir rock (long term fate...
TRANSCRIPT
Big Sky Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership –Kevin Dome Carbon Storage
FC26-05NT42587Lee Spangler
Montana State University
U.S. Department of EnergyNational Energy Technology Laboratory
Addressing the Nation’s Energy Needs Through Technology Innovation – 2019 Carbon Capture,Utilization, Storage, and Oil and Gas Technologies Integrated Review Meeting
August 26-30, 2019
Acknowledgments• US Department of Energy• Altamont Oil & Gas, Inc.• Columbia University & Barnard College• Idaho National Laboratory• Los Alamos National Laboratory• Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory• Schlumberger Carbon Services• SWCA Environmental Consultants• Vecta Oil and Gas, Ltd.• Washington State University• Montana State University
2
Dave BowenColin ShawOmotayo OmosebiLianjie HuangMinh NguyenPhil StaufferBryan DeVaultWade ZaluskiHarry LisabethJonathan Ajo-FranklinTim KneafseyChun ChangQuanlin ZhouCurt OldenburgLehua PanBill Carey
Site Characteristics – Scientific Opportunities
3
Natural CO2 production– Opportunity to study the natural accumulation and
long term effectsCO2 in a reactive rock
– Opportunity to study geochemical effects on both reservoir rock (long term fate of CO2) and caprock(storage security)
– To accomplish this, injection should be in water leg of the same formation
– Still retain engineered system learnings on injection, transport, capacity, etc.
Duperow is a fractured reservoir with very secure caprock
– Opportunity to investigate impact of fracture permeability
Domes Are Attractive Early Storage Target
4
Half of the current major point source emissions for the next 100 years ~7.5 GTResource Estimate for 3 Domes ~5.3 GT
• Prevent trespass issues – buoyancy flow will take CO2 to top of dome• Storage Efficiency – for Kevin Dome capillary pressure can be as high as
~7 bar driving higher CO2 saturation• Potential use as carbon warehouse – decouple anthropogenic CO2 rate
from utilization rate
Project Re-Scope
5
Project Re-scope: Maximize Learnings from Samples and Data• Complete the core descriptive work and core flood experiments to
characterize the pore and fracture geometry of the Duperow formation; • Measure the fracture-permeability of evaporite and dolomite caprock; • Perform laboratory measurements of seismic properties as a function of
CO2 saturation; • Perform laboratory measurements of fracture-matrix flow to inform
modeling of two-phase flow in fractured carbonate reservoir rock;• Complete seismic processing and interpretation including use of
quantitative interpretation techniques to determine if pore fluid differences in the reservoir zone can be discerned spatially without time lapse techniques;
• Apply full waveform inversion to develop a high resolution velocity model; • Complete analysis of the geologic framework and stratigraphic architecture
of the reservoir; • Produce a final geostatic model with descriptive metadata; • Improve phase change modeling using the production well data, assess
applicability to leakage scenarios and CO2 / EOR storage hub concept;
Project Re-Scope
6
Project Re-scope: Maximize Learnings from Samples and Data
Continued…
• Further develop fracture–matrix permeability interaction models incorporating data previously mentioned;
• Use the dual permeability model to refine reservoir performance for fractured carbonate reservoirs including capacity, injectivity and storage efficiency;
• Apply an integrated assessment model to Kevin Dome as a test case for NRAP tools;
• Process and analyze the surface monitoring data, assess baseline variability; • Modify assessments of regional and national storage resources with information
gained through the Kevin Dome project; • Capture lessons learned from the permitting, risk, and management components
of the Kevin Dome project through continued analyses and the development of peer-reviewed publications and web-based applications for information sharing and
• Use the Kevin Dome project to illustrate unanticipated geologic scenarios to inform EPA’s scheduled evaluation of the UIC Class VI rule.
Data, Samples, Models
7
• 430 ft of carbonate core from regions both with and without CO2representing 7 different depositional environments
• Acquisition of core on two caprock materials, tight carbonate and anhydrite (30’)
• 3D – 9C seismic data covering 32 sq. mi.• Development of a geostatic model using Neural Nets to match well
logs to facies and using p and s wave seismic to inform reservoir heterogeneity
• Geostatic model including fractures• Dome scale geostatic model• Model development for dual permeability systems• Unique mechanical testing of permeability – stress relationship in
caprock material
Duperow Facies Model
fromRon Blakey,http://cpgeosystems.com/wnam.html
430 ft of carbonate core from regions both with and without CO2 representing 7 different depositional environments plus anhydrite caprock core
9
Processing 3D, 9C siesmic Seismic
Bow Island
Lower Bow Island
SwiftMadison
Bakken
Souris River
Acoustic basement
SH surfaces
Density (g/cm3)
outsidesurvey 10,000 ft
10,0
00 ft
RHO PPSHSV Tri-Joint INV RHO PPSHPS Tri-Joint INV RHO PPSVPS Tri-Joint INV
RHO PPSH Bi-Joint INV RHO PPPS Bi-Joint INV RHO PPSV Bi-Joint INV
Duperow Horizon
RHO PPSHPSSV Quadri-Joint INV
DUPEROW RHO
Comparison at mid-Duperow horizon of the inverted density parameter obtained with different kinds of wavefields. bi-joint inversion (3 images at the top), tri-joint (3 images at the bottom) and quadri-joint inversion (right). bi-joint PP-PS inversion is very similar to the final quadri-joint inversion (right).
Able to image middle Duperow porosity zone
11
Figure_12
DPHZ vs Ip_rawColor KeyIs_raw(ft/s).(g/cm3)
40000 45000 50000 55000 60000
Ip_raw (ft/s).(g/cm3)
0.0
0.0
5
0
.1
0.1
5
0.2
0.2
5D
PHZ
(frac
tion)
32797
31769
30741
29713
28684
27656
26628
25600
24571
23543
22515
Crossplot between density porosity and computed P-wave impedance (IP) from the Wallewein 22-1 well over the Middle Duperow porosity interval. Note the good correlation observed between the two quantities. The correlation coefficient between the two quantities is 0.87. Colored values are measured IS values.
0.0
0.0
5
0.1
0.1
5
0.2
0.25
DPH
Z (fr
actio
n)
22000 25000 28000 31000 33000 Is_raw (ft/s).(g/cm3)
DPHZ vs Is_raw Color KeyIp_raw(ft/s).(g/cm3)
61296
59260
57224
55188
53152
51116
49080
47044
45008
42972
40936
Crossplot of measured density porosity and S-wave impedance (IS) in Wallewein22-1 well in mid-Duperow porosity zone. Note excellent agreement between measured two quantities with correlation coefficient of 0.89. Colored values are measured IP values.
Transforms derived from porosity-impedance regressions using IS (left) and IP(right) maps for the Middle Duperow porosity zone with well locations annotated and well derived values for porosity annotated with values derived from each map at well locations.
Y = 0.623x – 0.0151R2 = 0.3771
0.085
0.053
0.02
0.085 0.118 0.15
Mid-Duperow porosity derived from average density values from quadri-joint inversion converted to porosity using a dolomite matrix (left) and cross plot of this map with values derived from IP-based regression.
3D Structure-Enhanced Least-Squares Reverse-Time Migration Image of 3D Kevin Dome Seismic Data
Improved high-resolution subsurface velocity model for the Kevin Dome site obtained using full-waveform inversion
Refine Model Based on Geologic Interpretation
18
fromRon Blakey,http://cpgeosystems.com/wnam.html
Neural Net Depositional Env. Predictions
19
Good Neural Net Match Along Core Interval
20
Porosity & Permeability Modeling Within Rock Types
21
Porosity vs. P-Impedance
22
Use Multi-Component Seismic to Model Heterogeneity
23
Lithology Prediction Using Seismic Inversion
Probability Anhydrite
Probability Dolomite
Probability Limestone
Interpolated 3 Rock Types
Danielson
Wallew
ein
3D probability lithology prediction volumes as a trend for rock type interpolation
Rock Type Logs
25
Facies, Porosity and Permeability Interpolation
3-Rock Type 8-Rock Type
Perm
eabi
lity
Porosity
Perm
eabi
lity
Porosity
8 Rock Type model calibrated to geologist’s (Dave Bowen) facies log and facies model
Potlach
NiskuUpper Duperow
Lower Duperow
Souris River
Int Duperow
Mid Duperow
Danielson
Wallewein
Property Interpolation (Porosity)Potlach
Nisku
Upper Duperow
Lower Duperow
Souris River
Int Duperow
Mid Duperow
Wallewein
Danielson
Property Interpolation (Porosity)
Extrapolates to fill within the Dome scale model boundary
Need for extrapolation of properties into larger model space
Wells with petrophysics
Dome Scale Model Property Extrapolation
Middle Duperow – FracturesSite Characterization: Core Fracture Analysis
28
Natural Fracture Model
Open Fractures
Danielson Wallewein
Open natural fracture model of Middle Duperow (3 Fracture Sets)Open
FMI Fractures
FMI Fractures
Seismic Ant Tracking Attribute
Potential fracture corridors (Light Blue)Fracture Set Stereonet
Inputs Outputs
Fracture Cell• Permeability IJK• Porosity
Dark Blue (Open Fractures)Light Blue (Closed Fractures)
Duperow Facies Model
RokBase
MSU-ERI’s CoreViewerApplicationhttps://core.bigskyco2.org
NETL Geostash Whitepaper January 2016Assessment of & Recommendations for Management of NETL’S Physical & Digital Geo-Sample Assets
Similarity of Purpose and Implementation
CoreViewer was developed to store data and images, as well as to provide visualizations for well core data that was produced by the Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership. The system is implemented in the Drupal content management system and provides a data model to store data about earth materials.
From the Geostash Paper: “The open source database system, Drupal is recommended … and should be integrated into the Energy Data eXchange(EDX) for use by researchers. The EDX development team can write a custom database system with Drupal … that has a user-friendly interface for researchers to search for, request, and upload metadata for geoscience collections.”
Features
• Migration tool for data ingest• Forms for manual data creation and edits• Filterable display of Rok sets
– [ex] View a table of attributes from all samples with a parent relationship to the Danielson Well Slab Rok
• Data export tool– [ex] Download all fields for a set of Roks into a csv file
• Tracking location of physical samples– [ex] fields provided for storing current location,
coordinates, address, institution
Data Model• Minimum set of required fields with many optional fields
– Required: name*, material*, original location*– Optional: image(s), depth, field name, collection method, … ,
medical CT scans, p-wave velocity data, …• Support for file attachments of various types.
– [ex] xls, pdf, doc, csv, …• Relationship to additional content types provides ability to
store data directly in the database– [ex] Routine analysis from core viewer has been supported with
this method– Fields are stored in a separate data container that refers to a
sample Rok• Parent entity reference to implement hierarchy
– [ex] Display a view of all roks with the same parent = all core samples from the same slab
RokBase Data Model
44
Hierarchy – Roks maintain a relationship to parent Rok
Rok – Danielson Well Slab (Parent)
Rok – Danielson24243_3278_82B
Rok – Danielson24243_3273_92B
Rok – Danielson24243_3287_62B
Rok – Danielson24243_3399_12B
Rok – Danielson24243_3283_32B
…name*
original location*
p-wave velocity data
depth
image(s)
material*
…
Roks can be used to store data about earth materials of varied scale. Sibling Roks can easily be grouped in a set.
Subtask R1.5
Lab measurements of fracture-matrix flow to help with modeling of two-phase
flow in fractured carbonate
Chun Chang,Timothy J. Kneafsey, Quanlin Zhou
Earth and Environmental Sciences Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
CO2invasion
Water drainage
Fracture
Subtask R1.5. Lab measurements of fracture-matrix flow tohelp with modeling of two-phase flow in fractured carbonate
CO2 invasion into a fractured system and schematic of laboratory testsBackground:To access CO2 storage capacity in rock matrix, water must drain through fractures and matrix. Capillary continuity allows drainage across fractures to neighboring matrix blocks and requires quantification.Laboratory flow tests were conducted to:1. investigate the fracture-matrix interactions; 2. visualize processes showing the importance of capillary continuity to geologic carbon storage capacity.
Rock presaturated with water
CapillaryPressure(Pc)
Capillary Ceramic
Fracture
Chun Chang,Timothy J. Kneafsey, Quanlin Zhou
Core samples and fracture types
Sample #1: Homogeneous sandstone core, Brine permeability: ~10mD, Porosity: 0.153Sample #2: Layered sandstone core, Brine permeability: ~10mD, Porosity: 0.158Sample #3:Low-permeability sandstone core, Brine permeability: ~1mD, Porosity: 0.135Sample #4: Heterogeneous Duperow core (Wallewein 22-1, depth: 4129 feet), Brine permeability:
~1mD, Porosity: 0.042
Porosity
Posi
tion
alon
gth
eco
re(m
m) 0.20
0.15
0.10
Porosity 0.20
0.15
0.10
Porosity 0.20
0.1
0
Porosity #1 #2 #3 #4
Fracture
Pc-dependent capillary continuity Two types of capillary continuity of fracture Good capillary continuity
Water saturations in fracture (Sw,f) rangefrom 0.73 to 0.94 for both Sample #1 and#2 under Pc=2 and 6psi;
Higher applied Pc results in higher CO2saturation at steady state;
At Pc=6psi, CO2 invasion in Sample #1 is faster than in Sample #2 (bedding perpendicular to water drainagedirection).
#1#1Pc=2 psi
Pc=6 psi
#2#1
CO2-water flow with good capillary continuity across fracture
CO2 distribution and saturation vs. time in rock matrix
2psi, #12psi, #26psi, #16psi, #2
CO2-water flow with Pc-dependent capillary continuity of fracture
High capillary pressure causes CO2 to invade the fracture and lower continuity;
Lower Sw,f yields slowerCO2 invasion and waterdrainage;
Matrix anisotropy perpendicular to waterflow direction (sample #4)results in slower CO2 invasion than in sample#3 under similar Pc andSw,f.
27psi, #3, Sw,f=0.3027psi, #3, Sw,f=0.44
22psi, #3, Sw,f=0.6627psi, #3, Sw,f=0.3027psi, #3, Sw,f=0.44
22psi, #3, Sw,f=0.66
22psi, #4, Sw,f=0.62
1.0
0.5
0
SCO2
264h
Sam
ple
3
1222h Sam
ple
3
956h
Sam
ple
3
335h
Sam
ple
4
Conclusions The capillary continuity across fractures considerably
affects the CO2-water displacement rate and efficiencywithin the observed time scale;
The capillary continuity across fractures is Pc-dependent and can be expressed in terms of fracturewater saturation(Sw,f);
The displacement of water by CO2 across a matrix-fracture system is also affected by the matrixanisotropy.
Task R1. Core Studies: Motivation
• Assess caprock geomechanical properties and suitability
• Analyze fracture-permeability relations to inform caprock damage and leakage scenarios
• Determine relationship of stress conditions and fracture reactivation on permeability
• Provide input to induced seismicity hazard assessment
Bill Carey
Approach: Triaxial Direct-Shear Coreflood with Simultaneous X-ray radiography/tomography
52
Creation of shear fractures at reservoir conditions coupled with permeability measurements and x-ray observations
In situ radiography Direct-shear device
Carey et al., J. Unconv. O&G Res., 2015; Frash et al. (2016) JGR; Frash et al. (2017) IJGGC
Potlatch Anhydrite at 10 MPa
53
Caprock Geomechanical Tests
54
Summary of unconfined strength (150±24 MPa) and Young’s modulus (90±10 Gpa) compared with shale (X) and anhydrite ( ) The Poisson’s ratio is 0.32±0.05.
Anhydrite (Hangx 2010)
Potlach Anhydrite
Caprock Geomechanical Analysis
55
Upper Duperow (tight carbonate) - StrongerPotlach Anhydrite - Stiffer
Summary Permeability-Stress Relations
56
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Perm
eabi
lity
(mD
)
Confining Pressure (MPa)
Duperow Dolomite
Anhydrite
Motivation for lab seismic study
• Time-lapse (4D) seismic monitoring is one of the best tools we have to see dynamic changes in the subsurface
• Most of our understanding of changes in seismic response due to fluid replacement and stress perturbation are from studies of porous sandstones. We have much less understanding of these effects in low porosity, fractured carbonate reservoirs
• Measurements in the laboratory allow us to deconvolvecomplex effects of geology and gain understanding of the fundamental physics at play during fluid substitution and pressure changes
Harry Lisabeth, Jonathan Ajo Franklin
Gamma Neutron Sonic
Danielson Well (Production Pad)
Low frequency modulus/attenuation
Fluid replacement/ultrasonic characterization
Laboratory study of structure and broadband seismic characteristics of fractured, fluid-filled reservoir material
• Fracture shows multiscaleroughness, with undulations at the scale of the sample (9mm)
• Secondary fractures sub-parallel to primary fracture are evident
• At 0 pressure, aperture ranges from 10 to 100 microns
• mCT conducted to identify features of natural fractures which differ from induced tensile fractures.
[Conducted at beamline 8.3.2, Advanced Light Source]
Synchrotron x-ray microtomography of fractured Duperow dolomite
60
Illustration of subcore orientation. A 1.5” diameter by 1” long core was fabricated intersecting a natural fracture to test the seismic properties of a fractured, low porosity reservoir.
High Pressure Ultrasonic Results
61
P-wave velocity S-wave velocities (Two orthogonal)
Ratio P& S wave velocities
S wave anisotropy
Validation of LLNL Reactive Transport Model
62
Megan M. Smith*,1, Yue Hao1, Lee H. Spangler2, Kristin Lammers1,†, Susan A. Carroll1
Moderate Permeability Sample
63
Dissolved Ca
XRCT- Pre XRCT- Post
Sim new voids Sim new voids
pH
Dissolved Mg
Higher Permeability Sample
64
Dissolved Ca
XRCT- Pre XRCT- Post
Simulated new voids
Simulated new voids
pH
Sim
Sim
Accomplishments to Date
65
• 430 ft of carbonate core from regions both with and without CO2representing 7 different depositional environments
• Core flood / flow experiments investigating reactivity• Provided samples, data to verify LLNL reactive transport model• Laboratory investigation of dual permeability (fracture-matrix)
response to CO2 flood (capillary entry pressure, saturation, etc.)• Model development for dual permeability systems• Acquisition of core on two caprock materials, tight carbonate and
anhydrite (30’)• Unique mechanical testing of permeability – stress relationship in
caprock material• Development of a geostatic model using Neural Nets to match well
logs to facies and using p and s wave seismic to inform reservoir heterogeneity
Accomplishments to Date
66
• Investigation of multi-fluid / Joule-Thompson cooling effects on wellbore flow. Model improvement.
• Application of NRAP tools to risk assessment at multiple stages of the project
• Largest 3D – 9C seismic shoot 32 sq. mi.• Improved multi-component seismic processing• First quadri-joint inversion• Demonstrated high resolution velocity model from full wave
inversion• Lab measurements of pressure and fluid fill effects on seismic
response in fractured carbonates• Development of a core-viewer application for viewing core, plugs,
and rock data• Development of a Drupal application for a rock database for EDX
Wellbore Sealing Projects (Not BSCSP)
67
WELLBORE INTEGRITY AND MITIGATION 1Rooms 301, 302
Thursday
10:20 AM Methods to Enhance Wellbore Cement Integrity with Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation • Adrienne Phillips, Montana State University
11:20 AM Wellbore Leakage Mitigation Using Advanced Mineral Precipitation Strategies (FE0026513) • Adrienne Phillips, Montana State University
Wednesday
Poster Developing Biomineralization Technology for Ensuring Wellbore Integrity • Adrienne Phillips and Lee Spangler, Montana State University
68
69
70
Organization Chart
71
Organization Chart
72
Gantt Chart
73
Gantt Chart
BibliographyChang, C., Kneafsey, T.J., Zhou, Q., Core-scale flow experiments on
three-dimensional fracture-matrix interaction with application to CO2 geological sequestration. 2019 (to be submitted).
Oldenburg, C.M., Pan L., Zhou, Q., Fairweather, S. and Spangler L.H., On Producing CO2 from Subsurface Reservoirs: Simulations of Decompression Cooling and Phase Change, Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2019 submitted.
Mangini, S., Shaw, C.A., Skidmore, M., in preparation. Evaluation of the Jefferson Formation outcrop in Sun River Canyon, Montana as an analog for Devonian carbonates in the subsurface of the Kevin Dome. Rocky Mountain Geology 2019 (to be submitted).
Shaw, C.A., Omosebi, O., Experimental study of the effects of supercritical carbon dioxide injection on the three-dimensional pore structure of carbonate and evaporite rocks. 2019 (in preparation).
74
BibliographyOmosebi, O., Shaw, C., *Thrane, L., Codd, S.L., in preparation.
Experimental study of the reactivity of carbonate and evaporite rocks under geological carbon storage conditions. Environmental Science and Technology 2019 (to be submitted).
Mangini, S., Skidmore, M., Shaw, C.A., in preparation. Investigation of the reactions of CO2 with iron oxides and sulfides under simulated geologic carbon sequestration conditions. G3 – Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 2019 (to be submitted).
Mangini, S., Shaw, C.A., Skidmore, M., in preparation. Evaluation of the Jefferson Formation outcrop in Sun River Canyon, Montana as an analog for Devonian carbonates in the subsurface of the Kevin Dome. Rocky Mountain Geology 2019 (to be submitted).
Shaw, C.A., Omosebi, O., Experimental study of the effects of supercritical carbon dioxide injection on the three-dimensional pore structure of carbonate and evaporite rocks. 2019 (in preparation).
75
BibliographyGao, K. and Huang, L., Full-waveform inversion with a total
generalized p-variation regularization scheme for sparse seismic data, submitted to Geophysical Journal International. 2018 under review.
Gao, K. and Huang, L., An efficient vector elastic reverse-time migration in the hybrid time and frequency domain for anisotropic media, submitted to Geophysics. 2018 under review.
Zhou, Q., C.M. Oldenburg, and J.T. Birkholzer. Modeling CO2 storage in fractured reservoirs: 1. Buoyancy-driven invasion of supercritical CO2 with matrix capillary continuity, Water Resources Research 2018 (to be submitted).
Oldenburg, C.M., L. Pan, Q. Zhou, L. Dobeck, and L. Spangler. On producing CO2 from subsurface reservoirs: Simulations of decompression cooling and phase change, Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 2018 (submitted).
76
BibliographyCarey, J. W., Frash, L. P., and Ickes, T. (2018). Experimental
investigation of shear fracture development and fluid flow in dolomite. In 52nd US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium, Seattle, Washington, USA, June 17-20, 2018, page 6.
Frash, L. P., Carey, J. W., and Ickes, T. (2018). Fracturing, fluid flowing, and x-ray imaging through anhydrite at stressed conditions. In 52nd US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium, Seattle, Washington, USA, June 17-20, 2018, page 7.
Omosebi, O., Shaw, C., *Thrane, L., Spangler, L., Characterization of different depositional facies of rocks from the Kevin Dome for carbon sequestration. Social Science Research Network, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 14, Special Issue, 2018 (in press).
77
BibliographyDeVault, B., Bowen, D.W., Clochard, V., Delepine, N. and
Wangkawong, K., Quadri-Joint inversion: Method and application to the Big Sky 9C 3D dataset in Northern Montana. Journal Interpretation, 2018. In Press.
Onishi, T., Nguyen, M., Carey, J.W., Will, R., Zaluski, W., Bowen, D.W., DeVault, B., Duguid, A., Zhou, Q., Fairweather, S., Spangler, L. and Stauffer, P., Potential CO2 and brine leakage through wellbore pathways for geologic CO2 sequestration using the National Risk Assessment Partnership tools: Application to the Big Sky Regional Partnership. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018. 81, 44-65.
78
BibliographyMcCann, C., Repasky, K.S., Morin, M., Lawrence, R.L. and Powell,
S.L., Using Landsat surface reflectance (LaSRC) data as a reference target for multi-swath hyperspectral data collected over mixed agricultural rangeland areas. IEEE Transactions in Remote Sensing, 2017. 55(9): p. 5002-5014 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2699618.
Saltiel, S., Bonner, B.P., Mittal, T., Delbridge, B. and Ajo-Franklin, J.B., Experimental evidence for dynamic friction on rock fractures from frequency-dependent nonlinear hysteresis and harmonic generation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2017. 122(7): p.4982-4999 DOI: 10.1002/2017JB014219.
79
BibliographySaltiel, S., Selvadurai, P.A., Bonner, B.P., Glaser, S.D. and Ajo-
Franklin, J.B., Experimental development of low-frequency shear modulus and attenuation measurements in mated rock fractures: shear mechanics due to asperity contact area changes with normal stress. Geophysics, 2017. 82(2): p. M19-M36 DOI: 10.1190/GEO2016-0199.1
Spangler, L.H., Repasky, K.S., Morin, M., Lawrence, R.L. and Powell, S.L., A novel histogram based unsupervised classification technique to determine natural classes from biophysically relevant fit parameters to hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions in Remote Sensing, 2017. 10(9): p. 4138-1148 10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2701360.
Zhoua, Q., Oldenburg, C.M., Rutqvist, J. and Birkholer, J.T., Revisiting the fundamental analytical solutions of heat and mass transfer: The kernel of multirate and multidimensional diffusion. Water Resources Research, 2017. 53(11): p. 9960-9979 DOI: 10.1002/2017WR021040.
80
BibliographyOldenburg, C.M., Cihan, A., Zhoua, Q., Fairweather, S. and Spangler,
L., Geologic carbon sequestration injection wells in overpressuredstorage reservoirs: estimating area of review. Greenhouse Gas Science and Technology, 2016. 2016(00): p. 1-12 DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1607.
Yoshida, N., Levine, J.S. and Stauffer, P.H., Investigation of uncertainty in CO2 reservoir models: A sensitivityanalysis of relative permeability parameter values. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016. 2016(49): p. 161-178 DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1607.
Zdhanov, M., Endo, M., Black, N., Spangler, L., Fairweather, S., Hibbs, A., Eiskamp, G.A. and Will, R., Electromagnetic monitoring of CO2 sequestration in deep reservoirs. First Break - Special Topic: Unconventionals & Carbon Capture and Storage, 2016. 31: p. 71-78.
81
BibliographyZhoua, Q., Oldenburg, C.M., Spangler, L. and Birkholer, J.T.,
Approximate solutions for diffusive fracture-matrix transfer: Application to storage of dissolved CO2 in fractured rocks. Water Resources Research, 2016. 53(2): p. 1746–1762 DOI: 10.1002/2016WR019868.
Poggio, M., Brown, D.J. and Bricklemyer, R.S., Laboratory-based evaluation of optical performance for a new soil penetrometer visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) foreoptic. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2015. 2015(115): p. 12-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.05.002.
Bellante, G.J., Powell, S.L., Lawrence, R. and Repasky, K.S., Hyperspectral Detection of a Subsurface CO2 Leak in the Presence of Water Stressed Vegetation. PLOS ONE, 2014. 9(10) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108299.
82
BibliographyDai, Z., Stauffer, P.H., Carey, J.W., Middleton, R.S., Lu, Z., Jacobs,
J.F., Hnottavange-Telleen, K. and Spangler, L.H., Pre-site Characterization Risk Analysis for Commercial-Scale Carbon Sequestration. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014. 2014(48): p. 3908-3915 DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1021/es405468p.
Long, J.A., Lawrence, R.L., Marshall, L. and Miller, P.R., Changes in field-level cropping sequences: Indicators of shifting agricultural practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2014. 189(2014): p. 11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.015.
Tan, S. and Huang, L., Reducing the computer memory requirement for 3D reverse-time migration with a boundary-wavefieldextrapolation method. Geophysics, 2014. 79(5): p. 185-194 DOI: 10.1190/GEO2014-0075.1.
83
BibliographyBricklemyer, R.S., Brown, D.J., Turk, P.J. and Clegg, S.M., Improved Intact Soil-Core Carbon Determination Applying Regression Shrinkage and Variable Selection Techniques to Complete Spectrum Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). Applied Spectroscopy, 2013. 67(10): p. 1185-1199 DOI: 10.1366/12-06983.
Lewicki, J.L., Hilley, G.E., Dobeck, L.M., McLing, T., Kennedy, B.M., Bill, M. and Marino, B.D.V., Geologic CO2 input into groundwater and the atmosphere, Soda Springs, ID, USA. Chemical Geology, 2013. 339(SI): p. 61-70 DOI: doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.06.013.
84
BibliographyLong, J.A., Lawrence, R.L., Greenwood, M.C., Marshall, L. and Miller,
P.R., Object-oriented crop classification using multitemporal ETM+ SLC-off imagery and random forest. GIScience & Remote Sensing. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2013. 50(4): p. 418-436 DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2013.817150.
Vogt, S.J., Shaw, C.A., Brox, T., Maneval, J.E., Skidmore, M.L., Codd, S.L. and Seymour, J.D., Magnetic Resonance Imaging of permeability enhancement in fast-flow-paths during supercritical CO2 injection in sandstone and carbonate rock cores. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2013. 122(October 2014): p. 507-514 DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.08.013.
85
BibliographyBorgia, A., Pruess, K., Kneafsey, T.J., Oldenburg, C.M. and Pan, L.,
Numerical simulation of salt precipitation in the fractures of a CO2-enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics, 2012. 44(October 2012): p. 13-22 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2012.06.002.
Bricklemyer, R.S., Soil carbon determination using rapid, inexpensive, non-destructive spectroscopy techniques, in Washington State University, Deparptment of Crop and Soil Sciences. Ph.D. 2012. p. 176.
Bricklemyer, R.S., Brown, D.J., Barefield, J.D. and Clegg, S.M., Intact Soil Core Total, Inorganic, and Organic Carbon Measurement Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011. 75(3): p. 1006-1018 DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0244.
86
BibliographyLeach, A., Mason, C.F. and van 't Veld, K., Co-optimization of
enhanced oil recovery and carbon sequestration. Resource and Energy Economics, 2011. 33(4): p. 893-912 DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.11.002.
Watts, J.D., Lawrence, R.L., Miller, P.R. and Montagne, C., An analysis of cropland carbon sequestration estimates for North Central Montana. Climate Change, 2011. 108(1-2): p. 301-331 DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-0009-1.
Watts, J.D., Powell, S.L., Lawrence, R.L. and Hilker, T., Improved classification of conservation tillage adoption using high temporal and synthetic satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011. 115(1): p. 66-75 DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.005.
87