background: a 2007 survey of midwestern ltcf suggested that less than 25% had a written pandemic...

1
J Rush Pierce Jr MD MPH, Theresa A West RPh, Todd E Bell MD University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque; West Texas Influenza Center, Amarillo; City of Amarillo Metropolitan Medical Response System; Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo Background : A 2007 survey of Midwestern LTCF suggested that less than 25% had a written pandemic influenza response plan. Upon request from a rural nursing home, we developed pandemic influenza planning recommendations for LTCF. Methods : In September 2009, we mailed our written recommendations to 144 LTCF in West Texas and New Mexico and included a survey with questions about the facility, facility preparedness, and the usefulness of the recommendations. We performed standard statistical analysis on returned surveys. Results : 24/143 (17%) facilities returned the survey, indicating that they had read (21) or planned to read (3) the recommendations. 15/23 (65%) of surveys were from facilities in rural communities. 16/23 (70%) of facilities already had a written pandemic influenza response plan. Most facilities had stockpiled some supplies: gloves (19/24, 79%), alcohol based hand washes (18/24, 75%), surgical masks (16/24, 67%), and N95 masks (8/24, 33%). 18/24 (75%) had discussed obtaining vaccine with the health department, 17/24 (71%) had instituted staff education and training, and 15/24 (63%) had developed written material for staff and families. 11/24 (46%) anticipated staffing shortages; most planned to use overtime, non-clinical staff, and volunteers to provide for clinical services during staff shortages. Only 12% of facilities planned to use commercial agencies for staffing shortage. Of those who had read the recommendations, 100% found them helpful or very helpful. The most frequently cited anticipated changes based on the recommendations included changing isolation procedures (11/24, 46%) and vaccination program (9/24, 38%); review of staff absenteeism policies (38%); and revision of the written pandemic influenza plan (38%). There were no statistical differences between facilities in urban and rural communities with regard to the presence of a written plan, staff training, discussions with the health department, stockpiling of supplies, or anticipated changes based on review of the recommendations. Conclusions : This small survey suggests that LTCF may be better prepared for pandemic influenza than they were two years ago. These facilities found that mailed written planning recommendations were helpful, and would result in changes to deal with H1N1 pandemic influenza. ARE LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES (LTCF) PREPARED FOR H1N1? Recommended action items for long term care facilities preparing for the influenza season 1. Designate an Influenza Preparedness Officer for the facility 2. Establish a relationship with local health department & emergency management. 3. Anticipate the need for a dual vaccination program this fall for both residents & staff. 4. Offer free vaccination to staff. 5. Implement a policy to monitor & restrict visitors & staff with influenza-like symptoms. 6. Change the facility’s surveillance for influenza-like illness among residents & staff. 7. Plan for high rates of staff absenteeism. 8. Discuss access to antiviral medications with the local health department. 9. Review isolation precautions procedures and the supplies and systems needed. 10. Review and revise (or develop) a written pandemic influenza plan for the facility. Figure 2: Discharge Clinic Visit Status ABSTRACT RECOMMENDATIONS TO LTCF CONCLUSIONS 1. LTCF may be better prepared for pandemic influenza than they were In 2007. 2. Mailed planning recommendations to LTCF are helpful and can result in changes in pandemic influenza planning by LTCF. 3. Study limited by small sample size and low survey return rate. METHODS 1. Convene multi-disciplinary group. 2. Review pertinent literature and official recommendations. 3. Distribute by mail the recommendations and rationale to all LTCF in West Texas in New Mexico. 4. Ask those that read recommendations to return by mail a brief survey. 5. Exempt status granted by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center IRB. RESULTS Demographics of surveyed facilities 9% 73% 18% Type of facility Proprietar y Non-Profit Government 57% 9% 4% 30% Size of community of survey facilities < 25K 25 to 50K 50K+ to 100K >100K 75% 25% Have you discussed plans with local Health Dept? Yes No 46% 25% 29% Do you expect staffing shortages? Yes No Don't know Volunteers Use non-cl inical staff Extra h ours Fam ily Clinic/Hos pital Agency 9 11 19 1 1 3 Anticipated sources of extra staffing The research reported in this poster was supported by the City of Amarillo Metropolitan Medical Response System and the West Texas Influenza Center of the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. The investigators retained full independence in the conduct of this research. n = 24 21% 21% 13% 21% 25% Licensed beds of surveyed facilities 1 to 25 26 to 50 51 to 75 76 to 100 58% 21% 17% 4% Position of person completing survey Admin ICP Nurse Other 67% 29% 4% Has a pandemic influenza plan Yes No Don't know REFERENCES 1. Smith PW, Shostrom V, Smith A, et al. Preparedness for pandemic influenza in nursing homes: a 2-state survey. JAMA. 2008;300:392-4. 2. Koh GC, Sng J, Koh D. Nursing homes during an influenza pandemic. JAMA. 2008;300:2366-7; author reply 2367. 3. Mody L, Cinti S. Pandemic influenza planning in nursing homes: are we prepared? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1431-7. 4. Pierce JR Jr, Kellie SM, West TA, et al. Top ten list of long term care facilities preparations for the upcoming influenza season. J Am Geriatrr Soc 2009;57:2318 -23. Gowns N95 gloves masks hand wash none 4 8 19 16 18 4 Number of facilities that have stockpiled items Appoint PI Officer Contact EM/PH Dual Va c cination Fre e Vacci nation Restric t visitors Enhance Su rveillance Absente eism Stock Anti virals Change Iso lation pro c Revise plan 6 6 9 8 8 8 9 5 11 9 What do you plan to change?

Upload: chastity-lawrence

Post on 05-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Background: A 2007 survey of Midwestern LTCF suggested that less than 25% had a written pandemic influenza response plan. Upon request from a rural nursing

J Rush Pierce Jr MD MPH, Theresa A West RPh, Todd E Bell MDUniversity of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque; West Texas Influenza Center, Amarillo; City of Amarillo Metropolitan Medical Response System;

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo

Background: A 2007 survey of Midwestern LTCF suggested that less than 25% had a written pandemic influenza response plan. Upon request from a rural nursing home, we developed pandemic influenza planning recommendations for LTCF. Methods: In September 2009, we mailed our written recommendations to 144 LTCF in West Texas and New Mexico and included a survey with questions about the facility, facility preparedness, and the usefulness of the recommendations. We performed standard statistical analysis on returned surveys. Results: 24/143 (17%) facilities returned the survey, indicating that they had read (21) or planned to read (3) the recommendations. 15/23 (65%) of surveys were from facilities in rural communities. 16/23 (70%) of facilities already had a written pandemic influenza response plan. Most facilities had stockpiled some supplies: gloves (19/24, 79%), alcohol based hand washes (18/24, 75%), surgical masks (16/24, 67%), and N95 masks (8/24, 33%). 18/24 (75%) had discussed obtaining vaccine with the health department, 17/24 (71%) had instituted staff education and training, and 15/24 (63%) had developed written material for staff and families. 11/24 (46%) anticipated staffing shortages; most planned to use overtime, non-clinical staff, and volunteers to provide for clinical services during staff shortages. Only 12% of facilities planned to use commercial agencies for staffing shortage. Of those who had read the recommendations, 100% found them helpful or very helpful. The most frequently cited anticipated changes based on the recommendations included changing isolation procedures (11/24, 46%) and vaccination program (9/24, 38%); review of staff absenteeism policies (38%); and revision of the written pandemic influenza plan (38%). There were no statistical differences between facilities in urban and rural communities with regard to the presence of a written plan, staff training, discussions with the health department, stockpiling of supplies, or anticipated changes based on review of the recommendations. Conclusions: This small survey suggests that LTCF may be better prepared for pandemic influenza than they were two years ago. These facilities found that mailed written planning recommendations were helpful, and would result in changes to deal with H1N1 pandemic influenza.

ARE LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES (LTCF) PREPARED FOR H1N1?

Recommended action items for long term care facilities preparing for the influenza season

 1. Designate an Influenza Preparedness Officer for the facility2. Establish a relationship with local health department & emergency management.3. Anticipate the need for a dual vaccination program this fall for both residents & staff.4. Offer free vaccination to staff.5. Implement a policy to monitor & restrict visitors & staff with influenza-like symptoms.6. Change the facility’s surveillance for influenza-like illness among residents & staff.7. Plan for high rates of staff absenteeism.8. Discuss access to antiviral medications with the local health department.9. Review isolation precautions procedures and the supplies and systems needed.10. Review and revise (or develop) a written pandemic influenza plan for the facility.

Figure 2: Discharge Clinic Visit Status

ABSTRACT RECOMMENDATIONS TO LTCF

CONCLUSIONS1. LTCF may be better prepared for pandemic influenza than they were In 2007.2. Mailed planning recommendations to LTCF are helpful and can result in changes

in pandemic influenza planning by LTCF.3. Study limited by small sample size and low survey return rate.

METHODS1. Convene multi-disciplinary group.2. Review pertinent literature and official recommendations.3. Distribute by mail the recommendations and rationale to all LTCF in West Texas in

New Mexico.4. Ask those that read recommendations to return by mail a brief survey.5. Exempt status granted by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center IRB.

RESULTS

Demographics of surveyed facilities

9%

73%

18%

Type of facility

Proprietary

Non-Profit

Government

57%

9%4%

30%

Size of community of survey facilities

< 25K

25 to 50K

50K+ to 100K

>100K

75%

25%

Have you discussed plans with local Health

Dept?

Yes

No

46%

25%

29%

Do you expect staffing shortages?

Yes No

Don't know

Volun

teer

s

Use n

on-c

linica

l sta

ff

Extra

hou

rs

Family

Clinic/

Hospi

tal

Agenc

y

9

11

19

1 1

3

Anticipated sources of ex-tra staffing

The research reported in this poster was supported by the City of Amarillo Metropolitan Medical Response System and the West Texas Influenza Center of the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. The investigators retained full independence in the conduct of this research.

n = 24

21%

21%13%21%

25%

Licensed beds of surveyed facilities

1 to 2526 to 5051 to 7576 to 100100 to 150> 150

58%21%

17%4%

Position of person completing survey

AdminICPNurseOther

67%

29%

4%

Has a pandemic influenza plan

YesNoDon't know

REFERENCES1. Smith PW, Shostrom V, Smith A, et al. Preparedness for pandemic influenza in nursing homes: a 2-state survey. JAMA. 2008;300:392-4. 2. Koh GC, Sng J, Koh D. Nursing homes during an influenza pandemic. JAMA. 2008;300:2366-7; author reply 2367. 3. Mody L, Cinti S. Pandemic influenza planning in nursing homes: are we prepared? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1431-7.4. Pierce JR Jr, Kellie SM, West TA, et al. Top ten list of long term care facilities preparations for the upcoming influenza season. J Am Geriatrr Soc 2009;57:2318 -23.

Gowns N95 gloves masks hand wash

none

4

8

19

16

18

4

Number of facilities that have stockpiled items

Appoi

nt P

I Offi

cer

Conta

ct E

M/P

H

Dual V

accin

atio

n

Free

Vaccin

atio

n

Restri

ct v

isito

rs

Enhan

ce S

urve

illanc

e

Absen

teei

sm

Stock

Ant

ivira

ls

Chang

e Is

olat

ion

proc

Revise

pla

n

6 6

98 8 8

9

5

11

9

What do you plan to change?