appendix b- assessment of robustness of...
TRANSCRIPT
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
1
Appendix B- Assessment of robustness of sources
Part of the Rapid Evidence Assessment methodology involved an assessment of the
robustness of evidence sources against certain key criteria. This appendix presents the
research team’s notes on methodology assessment.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
2
Table 1 – Assessment of robustness of sources
Reference Methodology
type/category
Summary of
methodology
Sample details (where applicable) Method quality (including quality
of description and limitations as
recognised by authors)
Neutrality / reflexivity (How clear are
the assumptions / theoretical
perspectives / values that have
shaped the form and output?)
ID: 4, lucid (2010) 'CIWF Food
Business Qualitative Research:
Exploring Quality in relation to
Welfare', Powerpoint
presentation from lucid
Focus group Unspecified qualitative
method. Suspect focus
groups.
No details given. Possibly more in
appendices (not supplied with
source document).
Moderate No contextual factors are discussed,
but generally information not
available, possibly on account of it
being a summary presentation.
ID: 6, Northen, J. R. (2000)
'Quality attributes and quality
cues Effective communication in
the UK meat supply chain', British
Food Journal, Vol. 102, Iss. 3, pp.
230-245
Other: Development
of conceptual
framework
Develops a framework
drawing on previous
research
N/A - reference list provided. High Sources of evidence clearly set out.
ID: 12, Brook Lyndhurst (2010)
'Are labels the answer? Barriers
to buying higher animal welfare
products: A report for Defra',
Defra
Mixed: Literature
review, focus groups,
multi-scalograms
Rapid evidence review,
two rounds of focus
groups, and
stakeholder workshop.
Evidence review covered over 60
sources. Total of 10 focus groups,
in two rounds, with total of 96
participants. First 4 focus groups
recruited to two Defra segments
(PGs and CCs), next 6 recruited by
reported buying behaviour of
welfare foods; both rounds split
between urban and rural locations
and both had loose minimum SEG
quotas. Workshop with
High: triangulated approach with
mixed methods; focus group
recruitment designed to not prime
participants about animal welfare
issues so as to explore views about
animal welfare unprompted
These are not directly discussed, but
the study considered previous
evidence in research design.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
3
stakeholders from policy, NGO,
industry, consumer and retail
sectors.
ID: 17, Williams, A., Zraik, D.,
Schiavo, R. & Hatz, D. (2008)
'Raising awareness of Sustainable
Food Issues and Building
Community via the Integrated
Use of New Media with Other
Communication Approaches',
Cases in Public Health
Communication & Marketing,
Vol. 2, pp. 159-177
Case study Reports on the
Sustainable Table
campaign - different
methods used for
evaluating different
elements
N/A Moderate The organisation does have an agenda
which is evident in the background
information provided, but evaluation
data is reported in unbiased terms.
Lead author is an academic.
ID: 20, Reger, B., Wootan, M.B. &
Booth-Butterfield, S. (1999)
'Using Mass Media to Promote
Healthy Eating: A Community-
Based Demonstration Project',
Preventive Medicine, Vol. 29, Iss.
5, Nov 1999, pp. 414-421
Trial Milk sales data from
supermarkets (not all
were able or willing to
share data), in
intervention and
control city. Pre- and
post-intervention
telephone surveys.
Intervention ran for 6
weeks and post-
intervention data was
collected 6 months
later by re-contacting
the baseline
respondents.
Intervention city had a population
of 35,000. Control city had a
population of 34,000. They are 110
miles apart and have distinct media
markets (so no spillover from
media campaign). 366 respondents
in the intervention city and 374 in
the control city completed the
baselins survey. 285 respondents in
intervention city and 258 in control
city completed the follow-up
survey (73% of baseline
respondents) - only these were
analysed. Non milk-drinkers were
excluded from analysis. Unclear
what the timescale was between
High: Appears robust and
triangulated, with data limitations
highlighted. Unclear when the
follow-up survey took place, and
survey questions not provided.
The tone of the article is objective, but
the authors do regularly highlight that
they were involved in the design and
delivery of the campaign. They
explored the characteristics of those
who completed the baseline survey
but not the follow-up: these were
discovered to be significantly different
on three counts - more likely to live in
households using high-fat milk, lower
educational attainment, and more
lower-income and fewer high-income
households. The article outlines issues
that limit the generalisability of the
study: only one intervention
community and one control
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
4
baseline and follow-up. community; difference in self-reported
milk-drinking behaviour in the two
communities.
ID: 21, Beaudoin, C.E.,
Fernandez, C., Wall, J.L. & Farley,
T.A. (2007) 'Promoting Health
Eating and Physical Activity:
Short-Term Effects of a Mass
Media Campaign', American
Journal of Preventive Medicine,
Vol. 32, Iss. 3, pp. 217-223
Case study The data-collection
instruments came from
the 2004 and 2005
versions of the
Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System
(BRFSS) survey
designed by the CDC,
with locally added
questions specifically
addressing the media
campaign and its
intended effects.
The 2004 surveys,
which served as the
baseline, were
conducted from April to
November, 2004
(n=3137). The 2005
surveys were
conducted during the
campaign from
February to July 2005
(n=1500).
In comparison to the New Orleans
population at the time of the
telephone survey interviews, the
current sample was more likely to
be female (67%, as compared to
53%), white (35%, as compared to
29%), and educated (with 87%
having a high school degree, as
compared to 75%).
High High.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
5
ID: 22, Viswanath, K. & Bond, K.
(2007) 'Social Determinants and
Nutrition: Reflections on the Role
of Communication', Journal of
Nutrition Education and
Behaviour, Vol. 39, Iss. 2,
Supplement, Mar-Apr 2007, pp.
S20-S24
Review Literature review -
methodology not
explicitly explained.
62 references High: Large number of references,
but method (e.g. search strategy)
not described.
Hard to assess neutrality - see
comments on quality.
ID: 24, Schimitt, B.H. (1999)
'Experiential Marketing', Journal
of Marketing Management, Vol.
15, Nos 1-3, Apr 1999, pp. 53-67
Review Schmitt puts forth a
conceptual paper
describing the idea of
'Experiential Marketing'
and its component
parts, illustrating this
with examples from a
variety of consumer
brands.
N/A High Angle clearly set out.
ID: 25, Antronette, K.Y. et al.
(2004) 'Population-based
Interventions Engaging
Communities of Color in Healthy
Eating and Active Living: A
Review', Preventing Chronic
Disease, Vol. 1, Iss. 1
Review Qualitative meta-
analysis of the available
literature on
engagement
interventions for
healthy eating and
active living among
ethnic minority
populations. Broad
search for documents
which are then
compared and
23 studies between 1972 and 2000
were considered to meet the
inclusion criteria.
High Very clear.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
6
reviewed.
ID: 26, Wardle, J., Rapoport, L.,
Miles, A., Afuape, T. & Duman,
M. (2001) 'Mass education for
obestity prevention: the
penetration of the BBC's 'Fighting
Fat, Fighting Fit' campaign',
Health Education Research,
Theory & Practice, Vol. 16, No. 3,
pp. 343-355
Survey Part of ONS Omnibus
survey, March 1999.
Also worth mentioning
details of original FFFF
campaign - the subject
of this paper. BBC run,
7 week span, via peak
and day-time (BBC1 and
2 TV, local BBC radio),
also website, ceefax,
book, video, Radio
Times and phone lines.
Registration (£2,
included feedback
cards, booklet etc.).
Some campaign testing
beforehand.
Nationally representative Bristish
sample. Stratified probability
sample. n=1894, CAPI. FFFF
targetted at those with higher
prevalence of obesity - the main
relevant groups didn't correspond
with BBC's media reach, but there
was cross-over, namely social
classes 3NM & 3M aged 21-45
(skilled non-manual and manual
groups).
High Genuine, balanced attempt to assess
the FFFF campaign.
ID: 28, Abrahamse, W., Steg, L.,
Vlek, C. & Rothengatter, T. (2005)
'A review of intervention studies
aimed at household energy
conservation', Journal of
Environmental Psychology, Vol.
25, Iss. 3, pp. 273-291
Review Search of various
databases, following up
reference lists.
Inclusion criteria: must
have either a baseline
or a control group, and
focus on households.
38 peer-reviewed studies identified
between 1977 and 2004. Mostly
field experiments using quasi-
experimental designs. Considered
antecedent interventions (which
influence one or more
determinants prior to performance
of behaviour) and consequence
interventions (which take place
after the behaviour e.g. reward).
High They provide a long critique of the
referenced studies' approach (but not
their own). E.g. the authors point out
that where a number of interventions
have been used together, where the
experimental design does not separate
these out between groups, it's difficult
to determine the effect of any single
element.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
7
ID: 41, Mosler, H. et al. (2008)
'Deriving Interventions on the
Basis of Factors Influencing
Behavioral Intentions for Waste
Recycling, Composting, and
Reuse in Cuba', Environment and
Behavior, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 522-
544
Survey Used a structural
equation model (SEM)
to investigate factors
which influence
behavioural intentions,
based on the TPB, using
household level survey
data on reported
behavioural intentions.
The surveys were
conducted by trained
interviews, took 1 hour.
Assumed representative selection
of households in Santiago de Cuba
for face to face
interview/surveying. Interviewers
were distributed randomly about
the city at intersections, and then
selected households on a fixed
plan. 935 households were
included in the final analysis.
High High.
ID: 42, Ochoa, J.B. et al. (2000)
'Long-Term Reduction in the Cost
of Nutritional Intervention
Achieved by a Nutrition Support
Service', Nutrition in Clinical
Practice, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 174-
180
Other: Patient
monitoring
Monitoring provision
and uptake of
recommendations from
Nutrition Support
Service.
Patient numbers: declined from
616 in 1991 to 124 in 1999.
Hard to assess - see comments on
neutrality/reflexivity.
The paper appears to be strongly in
support of the Nutrition Support
Service.
ID: 46, European Commission,
Directorate General for Health
and Consumer Protection (2009)
'Feasibility study on animal
welfare labelling and establishing
a Community Reference Centre
for Animal Protection and
Welfare (Part I: Animal Welfare
Labelling)', European
Commission
Mixed: Review,
working gp, 3 x
survey, 4 x case study
Literature review,
participation at a
working group, 26
interviews, three
surveys, and four case
studies of existing
schemes around the
EU.
Surveys were of general
stakeholders (110), institutions,
and stakeholders of existing
welfare labelling schemes.
Medium to high Appears to be from a neutral
perspective, presenting mainly the
evidence from different strands of the
research in a systematic way and
without an obvious agenda.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
8
ID: 47, Government
Communication Network (GCN)
& Central Office of Information
(COI) (2011) 'Evaluating the
financial impact of public sector
marketing communication', COI
Publications,
Other: guide N/A - guide to assessing
impacts of public sector
communications.
N/A N/A N/A
ID: 48, IGD (2007) 'Consumer
Attitudes to Animal Welfare: A
Report for Freedom Food by IGD'
Mixed: survey,
discussion groups,
accompanied shops
Survey of 1,000 British
adults via in-home
interviews. 4 focus
groups. 4 accompanied
shops.
Survey sample 1,000, based on 210
sampling points randomly selected
each week and ACORN used to set
quota controls specific to each
location to ensure all population
sub-sectors are represented at
national and regional level. 4 focus
groups with 8 participants in each,
with shoppers at different life
stages and in different regions.
Not entirely clear where all the
data in the report has come from.
E.g. it contains a segmentation
model but not clear whether this is
based on the survey data. Focus
group quotes are used to describe
the segments, but it doesn't appear
that the focus groups were
recruited to segments.
Not explicitly discussed. The tone of
the report is very positive about higher
welfare foods but there are some
contradictions . The chapter on
Morrisons efforts on welfare is written
in 'marketing speak'.
ID: 49, Commission to the
European parliament (2009)
'Options for animal welfare
labelling and the establishment
of a European Network of
Reference Centres for the
protection and welfare of
animals', Commission of the
European communities
Other: Feasibility
study
Stakeholder
consultation.
Not given; described as "wide
stakeholder consultation"
collecting "the largest number of
contributions on this issue from
stakeholders in the EU and
outside".
High Independent research
ID: 50, Ross, G. et al. (2006) 'The
effectiveness of social marketing
interventions for health
Review Alcohol, tobacco and
drugs: Sample drawn
from reference lists of
54 studies in total. Clearly set out criteria to define
what counts as a social marketing
intervention, and assess the quality
They highlight a number of
methodological limitations.
Conclusions appear rather circular -
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
9
improvement: what's the
evidence?', Public Health, Vol.
120, Iss. 12, pp. 1133-1139
previous good quality
systematic reviews. 35
reviews identified and
310 individual studies
retrieved. 35 studies
met the inclusion
criteria (see right).
Physical activity:
Searched for systematic
and non-systematic
reviews (17 found) as
well as individual
intervention studies (48
articles found). From
these a further 62
articles were
generated, totalling 110
for assessment - 22 met
inclusion criteria (see
right).
of included studies as reasonable.
The comparisons made in the text
appear rather non-robust, highly
qualitative and very general -
would have liked to see a more
rigorous comparison e.g. QCA. They
do note that comparisons are
difficult, given different
methodologies of studies.
e.g. consumer orientation is identified
as a success factor, but it was also an
inclusion criterion; they state they
didn't compare amount/type of
formative research with outcomes, but
suggest that more extensive research
led to greater impacts.
ID: 51, Toma, L. et al. (2011)
'Consumer and animal welfare. A
comparison between European
Union countries', Appetite, In
press
(Re)analysis A literature review of
work on factors
influencing behavioural
willingness of
consumers to purchase
higher animal welfare
products; the use of
Eurobarometer survey
data from 9 European
countries (consumer
The data were extracted from the
Eurobarometer 66.1 Dataset of
European citizens (of the 25
Member states and 4 candidate
states). The Eurobarometer survey
was carried out by TNS Opinion and
Social, interviewing face-to-
face 29,152 citizens between 6
September and 10 October 2006.
Datasets for nine countries (Great
High High.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
10
survey) to create
structural equation
models for each
country expressing the
relative importance of
each observed or latent
variable.
Britain, Finland, Ireland, Lithuania,
Malta, The Netherlands, Poland,
Portugal and Spain).
ID: 52, Passantino, A., Conte, F. &
Russo, M. (2008) 'Animal Welfare
Labelling and Approach of the
European Union: An Overview on
the Current Situation', Journal of
Consumer Protection and Food
Safety, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 386-399
Review More a think piece
really, but contains
references to other
research.
19 references. Moderate: Think piece. Five of the references are EC. This is
more a think piece than a review,
promoting a particular approach to
labelling.
ID: 53, Kilbride, A.L. et al. (2011)
'Associations between
membership of farm assurance
and organic certification schemes
and compliance with animal
welfare legislation', Veterinary
Record
(Re)analysis All major schemes
active in 2009 were
invited to participate:
12 farm assurance and
6 organic schemes.
Data on past and
present members was
requested from them,
and matched with
inspection data from
Animal Health which
provided data between
2001-2008, data before
2003 were excluded
due to being
15 schemes provided data for
analysis, not always complete.
Records were provided for 40,939
inspections. Sample of complete
records for analysis was 38,659.
Although the data is incomplete, it
is the most complete data set the
researchers were able to obtain
(and the one that regulators work
with), and of a significant size.
Compliance is measured in the
model as a binary variable, and the
findings probably appear simplistic
when the real picture is likely to be
more complex.
This isn't really discussed. The paper
includes a declaration that they have
no conflicts of interest. It would have
been interesting to see a more detailed
analysis by compliance score or a
rationale for the binary scale used.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
11
incomplete. Enterprises
were inspected for
compliance with animal
welfare legislation and
codes in up to 12 areas,
and categorised on a 4-
point scale. For
analysis, the most
severe non-compliance
score was selected and
the outcome variable
was binary with the 4
points split into 2
categories.
ID: 58, Bernués, A., Olaizola, A. &
Corcoran, K. (2003) 'Extrinsic
attributes of red meat as
indictors of quality in Europe: an
application for market
segmentation', Food Quality and
Preference, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, pp.
265-276
Survey Exploratory research
was carried out in all
regions studied using
qualitative focus group
investigation (Corcoran
et al., 2001) and expert
meetings with meat
industry
representatives. These
fed in to the
development of the
quantitative
questionnaire.
Information from a sample
proportionally stratified by
geographical area, place of
residence (town size) and type of
outlet was collected in five
European regions located in
England, Italy, France, Scotland and
Spain. The survey was carried out
between October 1999 and January
2000. Respondents were selected
through judgmental sampling.
High High.
ID: 62, Guilkey, D.K., Hutchinson,
P. & Lance, P. (2006) 'Cost-
Review Outlines statistical
approaches for cost-
N/A High States a strong preference for
experimental designs.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
12
Effectiveness Analysis for Health
Communication Programs',
Journal of Health
Communication: International
Perspectives, Vol. 11,
Supplement 2, pp. 47-67
effectiveness analysis.
ID: 76, Scandelius, C. & Cohen, G.
(2011) 'A Life Cycle Stakeholder
Management Framework for
Enhanced Collaboration Between
Stakeholders with Competing
Interests', in Finkbeiner, M. ed.
'Towards Life Cycle Sustainability
Management', Part I, pp. 15-26
Other: Framework Conceptual paper
which uses a
combination of a
literature review with a
case study about Kenco
coffee.
Case study is based on 2 depth
interviews of up to 2 hours with
managers with over 30 years
experience in the packaging
industry.
Medium Medium.
ID: 77, van der Ploeg, J. et al.
(2011) 'Assessing the
effectiveness of environmental
education: mobilizing public
support for Philippine crocodile
conservation', Conversation
Letters, Vol. 4, Iss: 4, pp. 313-
323, Aug/Sep
Trial Questionnaire survey
administered by
students in intervention
and control areas, data
on crocodile mortality
from field observations
obtained on a quarterly
basis. Informal
interviews with
residents and officials
for qualitative insight.
Surveys in 14 villages, split into 4
areas: core area intensively
subjected to project materials,
peripheral area where contact with
materials is less intensive, urban
area with less exposure to
campaign, and control area.
Population over 3,000 in each.
Aimed for 40 respondents per
village, above age 7. Total of 549
respondents.
Measures taken for quality control
include surveys carried out by
students that respondents would
not associate with the government;
simple questions.
The article states that the funding for
the campaign was spent between
2002-08, but contains a graph which
suggests crocodile mortality decreased
significantly between 1998-2000.
There is no before-and-after attitudinal
data, only post-intervention data from
both the intervention and control
areas. Attribution question not
addressed.
ID: 82, Timlett, R.E. & Williams,
I.D. (2008) 'Public participation
and recycling performance in
England: A comparison of tools
Trial Literature reviewing
and case studies of
three behaviour change
projects in Portsmouth
Each project was conducted in a
target area of approximately
10,000 households. Large blocks of
flats were excluded.
High High.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
13
for behaviour change',
Resources, Conservation and
Recycling, Vol. 52, Iss. 4, Feb, pp.
622-634
between June 2005 and
December 2006 using
three different
approaches -
doorstepping,
incentives and delivery
of personalised
feedback to residents -
testing the
effectiveness of each
technique in isolation.
ID: 83, Cotter, T. et al. (2010)
'The case for recycling and
adapting anti-tobacco mass
media campaigns', Tobacco
Control, Vol. 19, Iss: 6, pp. 514-
517
Survey Telephone survey of
smokers and recent
quitters in New South
Wales aged 18+, using
list-assigned random
digit dialling, during the
time that two revised
adverts were broadcast
in this area and the two
weeks following.
453 for one advert, 456 for the
other; samples weighted to reflect
the Australian population.
Good sample sizes; unclear why
samples have been weighted to
reflect Australian population when
both the campaign and survey
were done regionally, and are
targeted at smokers rather than
general population. Also, survey
question wording not available for
review.
Makes the case for 'recycling'
advertisements, but based on strong
evidence.
ID: 85, Perl, R. et al. (2010) 'Mass
media campaigns within reach:
effective efforts with limited
resources in Russia's capital city',
Tobacco Control, Vol. 20, Iss. 6,
pp. 439-441
Survey Post-campaign
household survey of
smokers aged 18-45
(primary target
audience).
990 respondents. Moderate: Good sample size, lacks
baseline. Attributes impacts to
campaign by comparing
respondents who were and were
not aware of the campaign.
See comments on impact attribution
under 'quality'.
ID: 86, Otegbeye, M. et al. (2009)
'On achieving the state's
Other: modelling,
scenarios
Model development
and scenarios
Focuses on Northern New Jersey High High.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
14
household recycling target: A
case study of Northern New
Jersey, USA', Waste
Management, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, Feb,
pp. 647-654
ID: 87, Mee, N. et al. (2004)
'Effective implementation of a
marketing communications
strategy for kerbside recycling: a
case study from Rushcliffe, UK',
Resources, Conservation and
Recycling, Vol. 42, Iss. 1, Aug, pp.
1-26
Case study Mix of quantitative and
qualitative methods,
including participation
rate measurements,
kerbside tonnages for
recycling, mini recycling
site tonnages, number
of home composter
units sold, monitoring
of the media coverage,
response rates to
promotional tools,
comments/complaints
to the Customer
Services Centre via
customer tracking
software, focus groups
and Citizens’ Panel
surveys, postal and
online questionnaires,
street surveys, and
semi-structured
interviews.
A Citizens Panel of some 1000
residents had been recruited by
RBS in 1999. Quotas were used to
ensure that the panel reflected the
profile of the local population in
terms of age, gender, economic
status and ethnicity. In February
2002, RBC commissioned a survey
of the Citizens Panel concerning a
range of local issues, including
recycling and the role of
communication. Some 926
questionnaires were mailed and a
response rate of 54%was achieved
High High: recognised limitations.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
15
ID: 89, Deemer, D.R. & Lobao,
L.M. (2011) 'Public Concern with
Farm-Animal Welfare: Religion,
Politics, and Human
Disadvantage in the Food Sector',
Rural Sociology, Vol. 76, Iss. 2,
June, pp. 167-196
Survey Two mail surveys: Ohio
and nationwide, in
2007. Also includes
literature review.
The Ohio sample was stratified by
two strata: metropolitan counties
and fringe or non-metropolitan
counties, each sample drawn with
1,500 households. Of 2,808
deliverable surveys the response
rate was 35% (therefore about
982). The national sample was a
random sample of 1,677
deliverable mailings, response rate
28.5% (therefore about 478). For
both samples, surveys were
addressed to individuals to ensure
both male and female responses.
Both samples' demographic
characteristics are similar to those
of the state and national adult
population.
Reasonable - subject to usual
assumptions about what is
represented by an answer to a
statement on a Likert scale, but
they have done an extensive
literature reviews and looked at
the kinds of questions used in the
past. The relationships have been
tested repeatedly, in a number of
models.
They state that their approach draws
on the sociological stratification
approach. They also note that the Ohio
survey was conducted "as concern
about state government regulation
was growing among livestock
producers".
ID: 97, Buller, H. & Roe, E. eds
(2010) 'Certifying Quality:
Negotiating and Integrating
Animal Welfare into Food
Assurance', Welfare Quality
Reports, No. 15
Mixed: interviews,
work shadowing,
discussion panels
Cross-comparative
study of UK and France,
studying assurance
schemes for improving
animal welfare,
investigating mechanics
and practices of the
schemes. Interviews
with food chain actors;
work shadowing;
discussion panels.
Key figures interviewed for each of
the three certification schemes in
the two countries; the UK research
team shadowed an on-farm audit
for each of the schemes.
High High level of neutrality.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
16
ID: 98, Kauppinen, T., Vesala,
K.M. & Valros, A. (2011) 'Farmer
attitude toward improvement of
animal welfare is correlated with
piglet production parameters',
Livestock Science, In Press
(Re)analysis Using data from a
previous postal
questionnaire in 2010,
combined with data
from the Finnish litter
recording scheme.
Original questionnaire sent to 342
pig farmers in Finland, 137
responses received. When
combined with productivity data,
this resulted in a sample of 124
farmers.
Relatively small sample, but they
acknowledge that this may be
missing the less interested farmers
and interpret the results
accordingly. Language unclear at
times.
The research hypothesis is based on
the TPB framework.
ID: 113, Vanhonacker, F., Van
Poucke, E., Tuyttens, F. &
Verbeke, W. (2010) 'Citizens’
Views on Farm Animal Welfare
and Related Information
Provision: Exploratory Insights
from Flanders, Belgium', Journal
of Agricultural and
Environmental Ethics, Vol. 23,
No. 6, pp. 551–569
Mixed: Survey, focus
groups
Quantitative (survey)
and qualitative (focus
groups) research.
Quantitative: 3 x survey (2000,
2001 & 2002), n=251 (Flanders,
convenience sample, age as only
quota controlled variable).
Qualitative: 2006, n=29 (selection
based on meat consumption profile
and on gender).
High Clear assumptions, likely to be
impartial, objective argument.
ID: 160, Kilchsperger, R., Schmid,
O. and Hecht, J. (2010) 'Animal
welfare initiatives in Europe:
Technical report on grouping
method for animal welfare
standards and initiatives', Econ
Welfare research project,
Research Institute of Organic
Agriculture (FiBL)
Survey Online survey,
conducted by partners
in 8 European countries
- assessed selected
initatives in on-line
questionnaire.
Secondly, used
clustering methodology
to carry out more in-
depth analysis
First part used 33 regulatory
initiatives and 29 non-regulatory
initiatives (e.g. campaigns).
High High.
ID: 176, Zander, K. & Hamm, U.
(2010) 'Consumer preferences
for additional ethical attributes
Survey IDM or Information
Display Matrix was used
- a computer-based
Test persons were acquired at
random and were subsequently
interviewed in front of
High Emphasise the benefits of the IDM
method.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
17
of organic food', Food Quality
and Preference, Vol. 21, Iss. 5
method which monitors
the processes of
information acquisiton
preceding choice.
Decisions were made
based on price and on a
series of 'ethical'
attributes, chosen
based on a literature
review, organic farm
surveys, and expert
interviews.
supermarkets or organic food
shops. Only people who buy
organic milk at least occasionally
were asked to participate. 240
interviews in each of the five
countries were conducted - total
1192 observations.
ID: 177, Vanhonacker, F. &
Verbeke, W. (2009) 'Buying
higher welfare poultry products?
Profiling Flemish consumers who
do and do not', Poultry Science,
Vol. 88, Iss. 12, pp. 2702-2711
Survey Cross-sectional survey
data using self-
administered web-
based questionnaires.
Flemish consumers from Northern
Belgium, n = 469, selected using a
nonprobability snowball sampling
procedure, to obtain a sample that
matches with the age distribution
of the adult population.
High Clearly sets out the theory and
assumptions.
ID: 178, Verbeke, W. (2009)
'Stakeholder, citizen and
consumer interests in farm
animal welfare', Animal Welfare,
Vol. 18, Iss. 4, Special Issue, pp.
325-333
Review Literature review. Includes reference list High - would have been good to
see search strategy for literature
review however
High.
ID: 186, Howard, P.H. & Allen, P.
(2010) 'Beyond Organic and Fair
Trade? An Analysis of Ecolabel
Preferences in the United States',
Rural Sociology, Vol. 75, Iss.
Survey Mail survey; examined
ecolabels covering
humane, living wave,
locally grown, small-
scale, and US-grown;
Piloted in California in 2004, 48.3%
response rate. In 2006 it was
mailed to 1,000 randomly selected
households in all 50 states, with
instructions for it to be filled out by
Good sample size and clearly set
out method. Lacks pictures of
actual labels. No analysis of the
oddities in %s flagged earlier.
Question order unlikely to have
There is a section assessing the
limitations of the study, however these
focus mainly on additional aspects e.g.
WTP that could have been studied.
They note that 'family farm' may have
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
18
2, pp. 244-269 using a forced-choice
paired comparisons
format with 10 pairs of
items to provide all
possible combinations.
Also looked at potential
information sources of
which respondents
were asked to choose
up to 4 (not ranked)
and eight food-system
topics which they were
asked to rate their
interest about.
primary food purchaser in
household, response rate was
50.7% with 276 completed. The
sample was more likely to be older,
white ethnicity, have higher
educational attainment and
income, female (but primary food
purchaser was asked to complete
the survey). Mean age was little
over 50, income was fairly evenly
divided, and rural residents were a
small minority.
been randomised, as this was a
mail survey.
been a better term to use than 'small
scale'.
ID: 187, Onozaka, Y. &
McFadden, D.T. (2011) 'Does
Local Labeling Complement or
Compete with Other Sustainable
Labels? A Conjoint Analysis of
Direct and Joint Values for Fresh
Produce Claim', American Journal
of Agricultural Economics, Vol.
93, Iss. 3, pp. 689-702
Survey National web-based
survey, via a consumer
panel, in 2008.
Questionnaire
development used
focus groups and field
testing. Purchase
intentions elicited
through a conjoint
choice experiment,
looking at claim-origin
combinations; six
blocks with 8 paired
comparisons,
respondents randomly
assigned to a block. The
1,889 primary shopper panelists
invited to participate, of whom
1,268 responded. Eligible sample of
1,052. Sample looks different from
national population, but the target
audience were primary shoppers.
Good. Even includes pictures of
mock-up labels.
High.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
19
claims are organic (real
label), fair trade, and
carbon footprint (mock-
up labels), and the
origins are local (within
300 miles), domestic
(specific states) and
imported (specific
counries). Apples and
tomatoes used as
products and
respondents randomly
assigned one of these.
Data analysed within a
random utility
framework.
ID: 190, Low, W. & Davenport, E.
(2009) 'Organizational
Leadership, Ethics and the
Challenges of Marketing Fair and
Ethical Trade', Journal of
Business Ethics, Vol. 86,
Supplement 1, pp. 97-108
Review Critical evaluation of
current trends in ethical
consumerism
particularly as it relates
to fair trade and 'no
sweat' products
N/A Medium-high Medium-high.
ID: 191, Hinrichs, C.C. & Allen, P.
(2008) 'Selective patronage and
social justice: Local food
consumer campaigns in historical
context', Journal of Agricultural
and Environmental Ethics, Vol.
Review Comparison of local
food movements with
other selective
patronage campaigns in
US history around food
purchase.
N/A Medium-high Strong social justice focus/angle.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
20
21, Iss. 4, pp. 329-352
ID: 201, Datta, A. (2011) 'Public
engagement in international
animal welfare: Reflections and
cases', ODI, Working Paper 339
Case study 19 projects evaluated
(mostly in sub-saharan
Africa) using reviews of
project literature, two
rounds of telephone
interviews with project
leaders and other team
members. They then
report 7 projects as
case studies.
Looked at 19 projects High High.
ID: 205, Compassion in World
Farming Trust (2003) 'Educating
humane citizens: farm animal
welfare and the curriculum',
Education and Research
Department
(Re)analysis The paper mainly
analyses the national
curriculum (in 2004) for
KS1-4 for the inclusion
of ethical issues around
farming and farm
animals, particularly
welfare.
No research 'sample' of
participants; curriculum and
related textbooks only.
Moderate Relatively low neutrality - goes from
the starting point that improved
education should happen and will lead
to improvements in consumer
awareness and behaviour around
animal welfare.
ID: 206, Farm Animal Welfare
Committee (2011) 'Education,
communication and knowledge
application in relation to farm
animal welfare', Defra
Mixed: working
group, consultation
Report from working
group (est. 2007);
public consultation
(2008/9); written
evidence from 15
organisations and
indivisuals; oral
evidence from industry,
academia, vet groups,
retailers, consumers,
15 organisations/individuals in
public consultation section - list
supplied.
High Report appears balanced and relatively
free from bias, albeit from the
standpoint of higher animal welfare
being desirable.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
21
animal welfare
protection
organisations.
ID: 219, Chang, C. (2009)
'Enhancing the Effectiveness of
Antismoking Messages via Self-
Congruent Appeals', Health
Communication , Vol. 24, Iss. 1,
pp. 33-40
Survey Survey (on lifestyle and
personality - to set
context); Responses to
different magazine
layouts; Read a
segment of magazine
with ads; Scale rating
for smoking attitudes
(used mocked up ads).
n=97 High Appears neutral.
ID: 220, Geeroms, N., Verbeke,
W. & Van Kenhove, P. (2008)
'Health advertising to promote
fruit and vegetable intake:
Application of health-related
motive segmentation', Food
Quality and Preference, Vol. 19,
Iss. 5, pp. 481-497
Survey Large-scale online
consumer survey in the
Dutch-speaking part of
Belgium. A link to the
questionnaire was
placed on the website
of a widespread
national newspaper.
Respondents rated 45
items on a 7 point
Likert-scale. Questions
based on desk research
and previous qualitative
research (18 in-depth
interviews and three
group discussions in
which participants were
615 consumers between the ages
of 17 and 77. Women were slightly
overrepresented (59.0%) as were
people with a higher education
(59.4%).
Medium-high Clear.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
22
encouraged to talk
about their subjective
perceptions of the
meaning of health.)
ID: 224, Schmid, K.L. et al. (2008)
'Targeting or Tailoring?
Maximizing Resources to Create
Effective Health
Communications', Mark Health
Serv., 28(1): pp. 32–37
Review Appears to be a
literature review, but
no method set out.
Not stated. No reference list
available.
Unclear. Not stated.
ID: 225, Snyder, L.B. (2007)
'Health Communication
Campaigns and Their Impact on
Behavior', Journal of Nutrition
Education and Behavior, Vol. 39,
Iss. 2, Supplement, pp. S32-S40
Review Reviews the
conclusions of meta-
analyses and research
syntheses that examine
the effectiveness of
communications
campaigns and the
conclusions of
evaluations of "recent
prominent national [US]
campaigns", 2 studies
of original data
comparing campaigns,
and scientific literature
on health campaigns.
Contains 64 references. Search strategy not described. Strong focus on informing nutrition
campaigns, so many of the
recommendations are focused on
nutrition specifically.
ID: N1, Friend, K. & Levy, T.
(2002) 'Reductions in smoking
prevalence and cigarette
consumption associated with
(Re)analysis A qualitative review of
media campaigns on
how effective they
were at changes
The analysis was primarily limited
to studies conducted in the US
since Flay's review in 1987.
High: includes search strategy. High.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
23
mass-media campaigns', Health
Education Research, Vol. 17, No.
1, pp. 85-98
smoking rates.
ID: N2, IGD for Freedom Food
(2011) 'Shopper attitudes to
animal welfare'
Mixed: Survey,
accompanied shops
Accompanied shops
and online survey, both
carried out in 2010.
18 accompanied shops with people
with some interest in animal
welfare, in variety of retailers in
different parts of the country.
Online survey of representative
sample of 1,000 British meat
shoppers aged 16+.
Survey - note closed questions with
set answer options. Accompanied
shops - relatively small sample and
only covers those with some
interest in the issue.
Report has been produced for
Freedom Food and has generally a
positive tone. Questionnaire given in
full in appendix.
ID: N3, Ratcliffe, J. Et al (1997)
'Cost Effectiveness of a mass
media-led anti-smoking
campaign in Scotland ', Tobacco
Control, Vol. 6, pp. 104-110
Survey Panel survey of 1 in 10
callers to the anti-
smoking telephone
helpline.
970 adults were spoken to, with
data on smoking behaviour one
year later available for 587 panel
members.
High High.
ID: N4, Dentoni et al., (2009)
'The direct and indirect effects of
locally grown on consumers
attitudes to agri-food products',
Agricultural and Resource
Economics Review, Vol. 38, Iss. 3,
Dec 2009, pp. 384–396
Other: Online
experiment
Online experiment in
2008. Respondents
were first asked to
choose up to three
experience attributes
that they inferred when
evaluating a “locally
grown” apple, from a
list of eight suggested
attributes. Second, they
were asked to choose
up to three credence
attributes that they
inferred when
Convenience sample of 60
undergraduate and graduate
students enrolled at Michigan State
University.
Medium Recognises limitations e.g.
convenience sample.
Rapid evidence assessment of animal welfare communications | A report for Defra Appendix B - Methodology
24
evaluating a “locally
grown” product, from a
list of twelve suggested
attributes.