anextended glm-basedalgorithmforrecovering functionaleventsinreal world fnirs ... · 2019. 10....

1
AN EXTENDED GLM-BASED ALGORITHM FOR RECOVERING FUNCTIONAL EVENTS IN REAL- WORLD fNIRS NEUROIMAGING OUTSIDE THE LAB WITH FREELY MOVING SUBJECTS Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) represents a powerful tool to monitor brain oxygenation in ecological contexts. Real-world neuroimaging is particularly important for studying some mental abilities, such as prospective memory (PM), especially in case of cognitive dysfunctions and frontal lobe lesions 1 . Statistical analyses of fNIRS data require the knowledge of the event onsets timeline 2 , which is not known a-priori for real-world experiments conducted outside the lab on freely moving participants. Functional events in the real-world arise from the integration of complex and highly variable behaviours as participants are left free to accomplish the task without significant restraints. The identification of functional events in the real world can be extremely challenging. To automatically disentangle functional events in the real-world and to statistically detect functional activation trends directly from fNIRS neuroimaging data in a real-world PM experiment . INTRODUCTION Functional events were identified in close proximity to sPM cues (Figure 3). All the 5 functional events corresponding to the 5 sPM targets (event-based targets) were identified (Figure 3) . The AIDE algorithm disentangled both event-based and activity-based PM targets (road crossing) from the background ongoing activity (Figure 4C). AIM MATERIALS AND METHODS fNIRS Acquisition and Experimental Protocol Figure 1. WOT system RESULTS CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS The present method is the first attempt to recover functional brain events from fNIRS data recorded during a naturalistic task. Results suggest that “brain-first” rather than “behaviour-first” analysis is in principle possible. Group analyses will be conducted to assess and identify particular activations patterns across the fNIRS channels in response to the assigned real-world PM task. 1. Burgess, P.W., et al. "Mesulam's frontal lobe mystery re-examined."Restorative neurology and neuroscience 27.5 (2009), 493-506. 2. Tak, S., and Ye J.. "Statistical analysis of fNIRS data: a comprehensive review." NeuroImage 85 (2014), 72-91. Automatic IDentification of functional Events (AIDE) algorithm mathematical formulation Figure 2. AIDE flow-chart In agreement with previous computer-based neuroimaging PM studies 5 , we observed a major involvement of medial BA 10 during the performance of OG tasks compared to PM tasks (Figure 4). The medial ROI was mostly involved in the reaching of sPM cues (Figure 4A). For the nsPM condition, all the three ROIs were almost equally responding (Figure 4A). For the execution of the four OG tasks, medial ROI was consistently and mainly involved while the right and left ROIs were implicated in a lesser extent (Figure 4B). No responses from the medial ROI were found for the identified road crossing events (Figure 4C). A 16-channels fiberless and wearable fNIRS system (WOT, Hitachi High-technologies Corporation, Japan) monitored prefrontal cortex activity (Figure 1). Participants underwent a PM task outside the lab 3 , including two Ongoing conditions (OG) and a social and a non-social PM conditions (sPM and nsPM). Three cameras recorded the experimental session for behavioural examinations and for the validation of the proposed method. 1 Infrared Imaging Lab, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, Dept. of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy 2 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK 3 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK Paola Pinti 1,2 , Arcangelo Merla 1 , Clarisse Aichelburg 3 , Frida Lind 3 , Sarah Power 2 , Elizabeth Swingler 3 , Antonia Hamilton 3 , Sam Gilbert 3 , Paul W. Burgess 3 , Ilias Tachtsidis 2 3. Pinti, P., et al. "Using Fiberless, WearablefNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks." Journal of visualized experiments 106 (2015). 4. Friston, K. J., et al. "Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach." Human brain mapping 2.4 (1994), 189-210. 5. Burgess, P. W., & Volle, E. (2011). “Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: what have we learnt so far?” Neuropsychologia, 49(8), 2246-2257. The AIDE algorithm identifies functional events based on the GLM-based least square fit analysis under the assumption that - estimates are indicators of the goodness of fit between a model of functional activation and the fNIRS experimental data 4 (Figure 2). Figure 4. ROI analysis results Figure 3. Behavioural meaning of the detected functional events (red asterisks) for one participant overlapped onto the map of the experimental area. Magenta, green and black triangles indicate the involved ROIs. Light blue squares indicate the positions of the social PM targets. Binary maps represent the channels involved in each event.

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ANEXTENDED GLM-BASEDALGORITHMFORRECOVERING FUNCTIONALEVENTSINREAL WORLD fNIRS ... · 2019. 10. 11. · ANEXTENDEDGLM-BASEDALGORITHMFORRECOVERING FUNCTIONALEVENTSINREAL-WORLDfNIRSNEUROIMAGING

AN EXTENDED GLM-BASED ALGORITHM FOR RECOVERINGFUNCTIONAL EVENTS IN REAL-WORLD fNIRS NEUROIMAGING

OUTSIDE THE LAB WITH FREELY MOVING SUBJECTS

• Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) represents a powerful tool to monitor brain oxygenation in ecological contexts.• Real-world neuroimaging is particularly important for studying some mental abilities, such as prospective memory (PM), especially in case of cognitive

dysfunctions and frontal lobe lesions1.• Statistical analyses of fNIRS data require the knowledge of the event onsets timeline2, which is not known a-priori for real-world experiments conducted outside

the lab on freely moving participants.• Functional events in the real-world arise from the integration of complex and highly variable behaviours as participants are left free to accomplish the task

without significant restraints.• The identification of functional events in the real world can be extremely challenging.

To automatically disentangle functional events in the real-world and to statistically detect functional activation trends directly from fNIRS neuroimaging data in areal-world PM experiment .

INTRODUCTION

• Functional events were identified in close proximityto sPM cues (Figure 3).

• All the 5 functional events corresponding to the 5sPM targets (event-based targets) were identified(Figure 3) .

• The AIDE algorithm disentangled both event-based andactivity-based PM targets (road crossing) from thebackground ongoing activity (Figure 4C).

AIM

MATERIALS AND METHODS

fNIRS Acquisition and Experimental Protocol

Figure 1. WOT system

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS• The present method is the first attempt to recover functional brain events from fNIRS data recorded during a naturalistic task.• Results suggest that “brain-first” rather than “behaviour-first” analysis is in principle possible.• Group analyses will be conducted to assess and identify particular activations patterns across the fNIRS channels in response to the assigned real-world PM task.

1. Burgess, P.W., et al. "Mesulam's frontal lobe mystery re-examined."Restorative neurology and neuroscience 27.5 (2009), 493-506.2. Tak, S., and Ye J.. "Statistical analysis of fNIRS data: a comprehensive review." NeuroImage 85 (2014), 72-91.

Automatic IDentification of functional Events (AIDE) algorithm mathematical formulation

Figure 2. AIDE flow-chart

• In agreement with previous computer-basedneuroimaging PM studies5, we observed amajor involvement of medial BA 10 duringthe performance of OG tasks compared to PMtasks (Figure 4).

• The medial ROI was mostly involved in thereaching of sPM cues (Figure 4A).

• For the nsPM condition, all the three ROIswere almost equally responding (Figure 4A).

• For the execution of the four OG tasks,medial ROI was consistently and mainlyinvolved while the right and left ROIs wereimplicated in a lesser extent (Figure 4B).

• No responses from the medial ROI werefound for the identified road crossing events(Figure 4C).

• A 16-channels fiberless and wearable fNIRSsystem (WOT, Hitachi High-technologiesCorporation, Japan) monitored prefrontal cortexactivity (Figure 1).

• Participants underwent a PM task outside thelab3, including two Ongoing conditions (OG) anda social and a non-social PM conditions (sPM andnsPM).

• Three cameras recorded the experimental sessionfor behavioural examinations and for thevalidation of the proposed method.

1 Infrared Imaging Lab, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, Dept. of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy

2 Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK3 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK

Paola Pinti1,2, Arcangelo Merla1, Clarisse Aichelburg3, Frida Lind3, Sarah Power2, Elizabeth Swingler3, Antonia Hamilton3,Sam Gilbert3, Paul W. Burgess3, Ilias Tachtsidis2

3. Pinti, P., et al. "Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks." Journal of visualized experiments 106 (2015).4. Friston, K. J., et al. "Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach." Human brain mapping 2.4 (1994), 189-210.5. Burgess, P. W., & Volle, E. (2011). “Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: what have we learnt so far?” Neuropsychologia, 49(8), 2246-2257.

The AIDE algorithmidentifies functionalevents based on theGLM-based least square fitanalysis under theassumption that 𝛽 -estimates are indicatorsof the goodness of fitbetween a model offunctional activation andthe fNIRS experimentaldata4 (Figure 2).

Figure 4. ROI analysis results

Figure 3. Behavioural meaning of the detected functional events (red asterisks) for oneparticipant overlapped onto the map of the experimental area. Magenta, green and black

triangles indicate the involved ROIs. Light blue squares indicate the positions of the social PM targets. Binary maps represent the channels involved in each event.