and the photoproduction - ssu.ac.kr
TRANSCRIPT
Hypernuclear structure and the photoproduction
T. Motoba (Osaka E-C)
HaPhys Workshop 2014
Soongsil University, Seoul March 3 - 4, 2014
1
Recollecting: APCTP Workshop on Strangeness Nuclear Physics (1999) Seoul Nat. Univ., successfully organized by Il-T. Cheon (Yonsei), S.-W.Hong (Sunkyunkan) and T.Motoba (Osaka E-C.)
2
CONTENTS 1.Introduction
2. How to produce hypernuclei: Elementary processes
3. Reaction Theories for hypernuclear production
4. Extended structure calculations for hypernuclear
spectroscopy
4-1. Light hypernucleus with microscopic
cluster model (9LBe)
4-2. Shrinkage effect by L addition (7LLi)
4-3. Heavy hypernucleus vs. (p+,K+) reaction
4-4. (g,K+) reaction to produce sd-shell and
heavier systems 5. Concluding remarks 3
1. Introduction
4 (From H. Tamura)
5
More bound states: Hypernuclei provide us with new opportunities to study V(Y-N) and dynamics of new baryon many-body systems.
6 Taken from N. Nakamura, based on O. Hashimoto and H. Tamura
Progress in disclosing L
9Be level structure
high precision
g-rays (Tamura e tal)
7
Microscopic Cluster model, Motoba, Bando, Ikeda, PTP79, 189 (1983)
2. Elementray hyperon production processes and the characteristics
8
Three factors: 1. Hyperon recoil momentum 2. Selectivity due to process 3. Cross section
(1) Hyperon recoil momentum qY as a function of projectile momentum
(2) Selectivity of hypernuclear production
(K-,π-) at p=0.8 GeV/c: > Recoilless production of Λ > substitutional states with
ΔL=0,1
(π+,K+) at p=1.05 GeV/c: > Natural parity high-spin
stretched states (g,K+) at p=1.3 GeV/c: > Unnatural parity high-
spin states
10
qL=350-420 MeV/c at Eg=1.3 GeV
(3) Cross section and polarization
11 Cf. K- beam at J-PARC
3. Production of Hypernuclei: Reactions on the nuclear target
Four factors: 1. PW vs. DW (Meson DW effects) 2. Microscopic treatment with elem. amplitudes, 3. Nuclear target has its own structure 4. Nuclear core excitation effects on hypernuclear production rates
(p+,K+)
(g, K+)
(K-,K+)
外側の軌道
19F(g ,K+) D19O 16O
閉殻
陽子の軌道中性子の軌道
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
Λ 粒子の生成軌道
8MeV
-2.5MeV
-13MeV
E
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
0d3/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0p1/2 0p3/2 0s1/2
Choose 19F(1/2+) target for demonstration
neutron proton
L (DDHF) Shell-model configuration
1s1/2
γ 線によるハイパー核Λ 19Oの生成断面積
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
ハイパー核励起エネルギー〔MeV〕
生成
断面
積〔
μb/sr〕
合計
1s1/2
0p1/2
0p3/2
19F(g,K+) L19O
SUM of the partial contributions
As a “closed core (18O)”+ L , cf. SO-splitting(0p)=152+/-54 keV(C13)
A BRIEF LOOK INTO REACTION THEORIES (A) FACTORIZED VS. (B) MICROSCOPIC
(A) Factorized DWIA treatment by Huefner-Lee-Weidenmueller, NPA234, 429 (1974)
15
a = kinematical factor for A-body to 2-body transformation,
Neff= Effective neutron number :
16
(A-1) Meson waves by the Eikonal approximation
(A-2) Meson DW with the Klein-Gordon solutions (Ours)
Applicable to forward scattering, 10-20% error of K-G DW ( Auerbach et al (1983).
17
PW vs. DW
(1)
In a typical (π+,K+):
Neff = 0.184 (PW)
0.030 (DW)
(2)
XS to low-J states
are much more
reduced, resulting in
the sharper peaks
(3) Interesting DW
effect (mechanism)
Low-L partial waves are more reduced by absorption effect, leading to well-separated high-L series of peaks
19
(B) Microscopic treatment based on the
elementary transition amplitudes
Elementary amplitude N Y
f = spin-nonflip, g= spin-flip , σ= baryon spin
20
R(i,f ;M) is expressed with three kinds of
the reduced effective numbers
Magnetic subspace population P(i,f : M) is
defined by
Polarization of Hypernuclear state | Jf > is
calculated by
Most sophisticated treatment
21
4. Detailed hypernuclear structure Calculations vs. Reaction spectroscopy
Extend the calculation framework to predict/explain experimental strength functions: (four examples selected)
4.1 Microscopic cluster model applied to L9Be
4.2 Microscopic cluster model applied to L7Li
4.3 Shell-model analyses of 89Y(p+,K+) L89Y
4.4 Shell-model prediction for 28Si(g,K+) L28Al
4.1 Microscopic cluster model applied to L
9Be
23
24
All the existing exp.data can be explained.
4.2 Shrinkage effect due to the L participation to the nucleus
28
Shrinkage due to Λ participation ( “glue-like role” of Λ )
T. Motoba, H. Bando and K. Ikeda, Prog. Theor.Phys.70 (1983) predicted by Microscopic α+d+Λ model
29
Renewed Calculation by E. Hiyama, M. Kamimura,
K. Miyazaki, and T. Motoba, Phys. Rev. C59, 2351 (1999),
Microscopic Λ5He+p+n model to see free p and n dynamics.
30
Contraction of Rcore-(pn) without changing p-n
distribution (Hiyama et al, 1998)
31
B(6Li,E2:3+1+) vs. B(Λ7Li,E2;5/2+1/2+)
32
Shrinkage: glue-like role of Λ confirmed
B(E2) in e2fm4
Dalitz
-Gal
Shell M.
(1978)
Motoba
et al.
3-Cluster
(1983)
Hiyama
et al.
3-Cluster
(1998)
EXP.
Tamura
et al (1998,
2000,2001)
B(M1:3/2+1/2+) 0.364 0.352 0.322 -
B(E2:5/2+ 1/2+)
*eff.chrg: δe=0.15e
8.6 2.46
( 4.16*)
2.42
( 4.09*)
4.1+-1.1
B(E2:5/2+ 3/2+) 3.1 0.40 0.74
B(E2:5/2+all)/B(E2)c 1.0
assumed
0.44 0.33
ΓB 0.49 0.32
Rcd(7Li)/Rαd(6Li) 0.83 0.75 0.87
Lifetime(5/2+) ps 6.56 6.67 5.2+-1.4 33
4.3 Shell-model analyses of 89Y(p+,K+) L
89Y
34
Probe deep-lying Λ single-particle states
35
36
For [(0lnjn)-1(0lLjL)]J
F.F becomes maximum at J=(bq)2/2
How to understand L89Y data (Hotchi et al, PRC64
(2001) in view of CAL(Motoba et al, 1988)
39
40 40
3L and 3R peaks as a function of d
42
Spin-spin and spin-orbit splitting
at A=90
Nijmegen B-B interaction model improved by taking account of hypernuclear data
4.4 Theoretical prediction vs. Jlab experiment
28Si(g,K+) L28Al
and other predictions
45
Cf. energy resolution
(K-,p-) G = 3-4 MeV
(p+,K+) played a great role of
exciting high-spin series G = 1.5 MeV (best)
(e,e’K+), (g, K+)
Motoba. Sotona, Itonaga, Prog.Theor.Phys.S.117(1994)
T.M. Mesons & Light Nuclei (2000) updated w/NSC97f.
------------------------------- JLab Exp’t : G = 0.5 MeV
46
Lab ds/dW for photoproduction (2Lab)
47
Spin-flip interaction are dominant
A typical example of medium-heavy
target :28Si: (d5/2)6
to show characteristics of the (g,K+) reaction with DDHF w.f.
( Spin-orbit splitting:
consistent with L7Li, 9Be,13C, 89Y )
48
4.4a Single-j model for
the 28Si target
)
Theor. x-section for (d5/2)6 (g,K+) [ jh-jL]J
49
4-4b. Realistic prediction for 28Si (g,K+)
L28Al
50
By fully taking account of -- full p(sd)6.n(sd)6 configurations, -- fragmentations when a proton is converted, -- 27Al core nuclear excitation -- K+ wave distortion effects Comparison with the 28Si (e,e’K+) exp.
proton-state fragmentations should be taken into account to be realistic
51
52 52
Proton pickup from 28Si(0+):(sd)6 =(d5/2)4.1(1s1/2)
0.9(d3/2)1.0
53
Peaks can be classified by the characters
54
Exp. data: Fujii et al, Proc. SNP12 workshop (2012) Great progress when compared with
cf. 28Si(pi+,K+)
55
Exp. data: Fujii et al, Proc. SNP12 workshop (2012) Theory: P. Bydzovsky, T. Motoba, …. , Nucl. Phys.A881(2012) Seems promising, (waiting for the finalization of exp. analysis)
40Ca ( LS-closed shell case): high-spin states with natural-parity (2+,3-,4+)
56
Elem. ampl. Theor. prediction vs. (e,e’K+) exp.
Theory
Motoba. Sotona, Itonaga,
Prog.Theor.Phys.Sup.117 (1994)
T.M. Mesons & Light Nuclei (2000)
updated w/NSC97f. -------------------- Sotona’s Calc.----
Hall C (up) T. Miyoshi et al. P.R.L.90 (2003) 232502. G=0.75 MeV
Hall A (bottom), J.J. LeRose et al. N.P. A804 (2008) 116. G=0.67 MeV
57
Theor. vs. Exp. Test of elem. Ampli.
58
Possible test of gp->LK ampl.
59 (From P. Bydzovsky )
6. Concluding remarks
1) discussed interesting topics selected in hypernuclear spectroscopy , by focusing the relation with production processes.
2) emphasized novel aspects of many-baryon systems with hyperon(s).
3) emphasized importance of producing medium and heavy hypernuclei with good energy esolution.
4) skipped the details of YN interactions, those experiments will provide with interesting dynamical structures together with YN interaction properties.
60
Life of strange many-body systems
61
62
Thank you for your attention.
63