title, 24pt arial bold - east texas
Post on 10-Feb-2022
7 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Utilizing Operating Systems to Effectively
Manage Completions and Production
Chemicals
January 2013
Todd Wauters
Global Business and Development Manager
Becky Ogden
Technical Training Manager
2 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Safety Moment
Emergency exits and evacuation discussion
3 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Overview
Introductions
MVP 2.0
– System Description
– Key Differentiators
Case Histories
– West Texas
– Rocky Mountains
– East Texas
– Northeast
Conclusion
Q & A
4 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 System Description
Multi-Value Plus
– Chemical reporting system designed and maintained internally by Multi-Chem
– Combines the customer data with analysis and production data which is exportable into multiple formats
– Examples
• Treatment Program Information
• FRAC Reporting
• Customer Cost and Usage Reports
• Observations
• Field Analyses
• Failure Analyses
• Customer Well/Production Information
• Lab Analysis and Data
5 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Key Differentiators
Accessible via Internet, 24-7
Real time, trending data linked to actual locations/injection
points
Key Performance Indicators- aka KPI’s
Monitoring reports (field tests as well as laboratory tests)
MSDS/PDB’s
Reporting speed & efficiency
Tool for system reviews/DOT Audits
Combines multiple reports to provide complete location
histories without further research
Automatic backup of data each night
6 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Key Differentiators
Linked with laboratory systems to provide actual lab reports
uploaded daily, accessible for a registered user from any
computer with internet access
Complete application and monitoring analysis: (Drill down to
a specific Location)
Financial Reports: Executive Summary (50,000’ overview)
down to location specific
Can be drilled down to the specific well/location to bring all
database/analytical/usage reports into one consolidated
report
Recommendations can be uploaded and viewed by locations
with the history stored within the system
7 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
8 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
9 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
10 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
11 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
12 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
13 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
14 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer A-
– Iron Sulfide (FeS) was causing rod parting and rod cutting of the tubulars which resulted in a high frequency of failures (reducing production and increasing costs)
– MVP 2.0 was utilized to monitor various chemical treatments which were not bringing down the FeS levels (Initial well bore grindouts indicated a 30% interface with 4% water wet solids)
– Change to AcroClear treatment program was monitored by tracking grindouts and failures by location
Program results-
– Clean grindouts and elimination of FeS
– Significant failure reduction
– Production increase of 4 bbls/day
15 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
29
11
4
8
5
37
16
10 12
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Bb
ls O
il
Well Name/Number
Customer A- Tracking Production Data
BBls Oil Pre-AcroClear BBls Oil Post AcroClear
Well A Well B Well C Well D Well E
16 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
6
9
6
9
4
7
0
1
0 0 0 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Bb
ls O
il
Well Name/Number
Customer A- Tracking Failure Reduction
Failures/year Pre-AcroClear Failures Post-AcroClear
Well 1 Well 2 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 Well 6
17 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer B-
– Injection well was not taking water due to high amounts of
FeS
– MVP 2.0 analysis tracking and trending tools were used to
monitor millipore filtration in conjunction with an AcroClear
treatment program
Results-
– The well which was not previously taking water started
taking water at 250 bbls/day at 1750 PSI
18 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer B- Tracking Lab and Field Analysis
19 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer C-
– Pipeline customer with severe corrosion rates
– MVP 2.0 coupon monitoring and failure reporting
were used to trend corrosion rates in MPY’s
– Effective biocide program was developed as a direct
result of coupon corrosion rate trending within the
system
Results-
– Corrosion rate reduction of 2.02 mpy to 0.25 mpy
– BS&W reduced from 1.5% to 0.1%
20 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer C- Tracking Corrosion Rates and Failures
21 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – Rocky Mountains
Customer D-
– Water disposal well was not taking water due to high levels of FeS and safety concerns were high due to increasing H2S levels
– A chemical program consisting of 3 combined chemicals was tracked in MVP 2.0 and shown to be ineffective at reducing FeS and H2S
– In addition, this customer was replacing a minimum of 16 filters per day due to clogging, and incurring significant costs from filter replacements, labor, and heightened safety hazards from potential H2S exposure
– The customer and operators were able to utilize MVP 2.0 combined with an AcroClear treatment program to monitor failure rates and program costs
Results-
– Initial chemical program cost was $89,000 per year combined with $16,934 in filter replacements, labor, hazard removal and safety concerns
– Chemical program after utilizing MVP 2.0 and AcroClear- $31,000 per year, no filter replacements at the 26 day point, and FeS and H2S elimination
22 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – Rocky Mountains
Customer D- Tracking Water Injection Quality
23 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – East Texas
Customer E-
– Overall operations cost reduction was identified as the primary focus for the customer
– The Multi-Chem team identified pump optimization as the leading contributor to cost reduction
– MVP 2.0 was used to trend the effects that modified pump rates and custom chemicals were having on production rates
Results-
– Reduced costs in all measured categories
– Cost related to production reduced as well ($/mcf, $/bbl)
– Chemical usage reduced by 36%
– Wells unloaded more water by 38%
24 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – East Texas
Customer E- Reducing Cost Through Pump Optimization
25 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – East Texas
Customer E- Reducing Cost Through Pump Optimization
26 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Conclusion
Summary-
Q & A-
27 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
“SERVICE IS WHAT GOT US HERE AND SERVICE IS WHAT WILL KEEP US HERE.” JAMES B. ARCHER – 1993
top related