nrc emergency preparedness and response aspectsnrc emergency preparedness and response aspects inpo...
Post on 04-Jul-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
NR
C E
mer
genc
y Pr
epar
edne
ss
and
Res
pons
e A
spec
tsIN
PO N
ew E
P M
anag
ers’
Sem
inar
Aug
ust 1
7, 2
015
Jose
ph D
. And
erso
n, C
hief
Ope
ratin
g R
eact
or L
icen
sing
and
Out
reac
h B
ranc
hO
ffice
of N
ucle
ar S
ecur
ity a
nd In
cide
nt R
espo
nse
Fran
cis
(Pau
l) Pe
duzz
i, C
hief
Coo
rdin
atio
n B
ranc
hO
ffice
of N
ucle
ar S
ecur
ity a
nd In
cide
nt R
espo
nse
Reg
ulat
ory
Bas
is
2
The
Com
mis
sion
Exe
cutiv
e D
irect
orfo
r Ope
ratio
ns (E
DO
))
Dep
uty
Exec
utiv
e D
irect
orfo
r Rea
ctor
and
Prep
ared
ness
Pro
gram
s
Dep
uty
Exe
cutiv
e D
irect
orfo
r Cor
pora
te M
anag
emen
tD
eput
y E
xecu
tive
Dire
ctor
for M
ater
ials
, Was
te, R
esea
rch,
Sta
te,
Trib
al a
nd C
ompl
ianc
e P
rogr
ams
Reg
iona
l Adm
inis
trat
ors
(Reg
ions
I, II
, III,
and
IV)
Offi
ce o
f New
Rea
ctor
s
Offi
ce o
f Nuc
lear
Se
curit
y an
d In
cide
nt
Res
pons
e
Offi
ce o
f Nuc
lear
R
eact
or R
egul
atio
n
Offi
ce o
fN
ucle
ar R
egul
ator
y R
esea
rch
Dire
ctor
Offi
ce o
fEn
forc
emen
t
Offi
ce o
fN
ucle
ar M
ater
ial
Safe
ty a
nd S
afeg
uard
s
Offi
ce o
f Inv
estig
atio
ns
Offi
ce o
fIn
form
atio
n S
ervi
ces
Offi
ce o
fA
dmin
istra
tion
Com
pute
rS
ecur
ity O
ffice
Adv
isor
y C
omm
ittee
O
n R
eact
or S
afet
y
Ato
mic
Saf
ety
and
Lice
nsin
g B
oard
•C
omm
issi
on S
EC
Y P
aper
:
Offi
ce o
f the
Sec
reta
ry (S
EC
Y) o
f the
Com
mis
sion
oN
otat
iona
l (“V
otin
g”):
Com
mis
sion
maj
ority
oIn
form
atio
nal
•S
taff
Req
uire
men
ts M
emor
andu
m (S
RM
)
3
Com
mis
sion
–St
aff I
nter
face
4
NSI
R O
rgan
izat
ion
Offi
ce o
f N
ucle
ar S
ecur
ity
and
Inci
dent
Res
pons
e(N
SIR
)
Div
isio
n of
Pr
epar
edne
ss
and
Res
pons
e(D
PR)
Div
isio
n of
S
ecur
ity O
pera
tions
(DS
O)
Div
isio
n of
Sec
urity
Pol
icy
(DS
P)
Div
isio
n of
Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d R
espo
nse
Ope
ratin
g R
eact
ors
and
Out
reac
h B
ranc
hJo
e A
nder
son,
Chi
ef(3
01) 2
87-9
300
jose
ph.a
nder
son@
nrc.
gov
Insp
ectio
n an
d R
egul
ator
yIm
prov
emen
tsB
ranc
hB
ob K
ahle
r, C
hief
(301
) 287
-375
6ro
bert
.kah
ler@
nrc.
gov
New
Rea
ctor
Li
cens
ing
Bra
nch
Alis
on R
iver
a, C
hief
(301
) 287
-375
0al
ison
.rive
ra@
nrc.
gov
Div
isio
n of
Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d R
espo
nse
Rob
ert L
ewis
, Dire
ctor
Jam
es A
nder
sen,
Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
Ope
ratio
ns B
ranc
h(H
Q O
pera
tions
Offi
cers
)B
ern
Sta
plet
on, C
hief
(301
) 287
-353
2be
rnar
d.st
aple
ton@
nrc.
gov
Coo
rdin
atio
n B
ranc
h(O
pera
tions
Cen
ter)
Pau
l Ped
uzzi
, Chi
ef(3
01) 2
87-3
787
fran
cis.
pedu
zzi@
nrc.
gov
5
FEM
A /
NR
C C
oord
inat
ion
App
endi
x A
to 4
4 C
FR 3
53“M
emor
andu
m o
f Und
erst
andi
ng (M
OU
) Bet
wee
n th
e Fe
dera
l Em
erge
ncy
Man
agem
ent A
genc
y (F
EM
A) a
nd
the
Nuc
lear
Reg
ulat
ory
Com
mis
sion
(NR
C)”
Est
ablis
hes
fram
ewor
k of
coo
pera
tion:
oA
utho
ritie
s an
d R
espo
nsib
ilitie
s
oA
reas
of C
oope
ratio
n
oN
RC
/FE
MA
Ste
erin
g C
omm
ittee
on
Em
erge
ncy
Pre
pare
dnes
s
6
FEM
A /
NR
C M
OU
FEM
A R
espo
nsib
ilitie
s:•
Lead
for o
ffsite
em
erge
ncy
plan
ning
, inc
ludi
ng th
e re
view
and
as
sess
men
t of o
ffsite
em
erge
ncy
plan
s an
d pr
epar
edne
ss fo
r ad
equa
cy
NR
C R
espo
nsib
ilitie
s:•
Ass
ess
licen
see
emer
genc
y pl
ans
for a
dequ
acy,
and
ver
ify
adeq
uate
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce•
Rev
iew
FE
MA
find
ings
and
det
erm
inat
ions
as
to w
heth
er o
ffsite
pl
ans
are
adeq
uate
and
can
be
impl
emen
ted
•D
ecis
ions
with
rega
rds
to o
vera
ll st
ate
of e
mer
genc
y pr
epar
edne
ss (“
Con
tinue
d R
easo
nabl
e A
ssur
ance
”)
7
FEM
A /
NR
C M
OU
Are
as o
f Coo
pera
tion:
•N
RC
lice
nsin
g re
view
s
•FE
MA
revi
ew o
f offs
ite p
lans
and
pre
pare
dnes
s
•P
repa
ratio
n fo
r and
eva
luat
ion
of jo
int e
xerc
ises
•W
ithdr
awal
of r
easo
nabl
e as
sura
nce
findi
ngo
“120
day
clo
ck”
•E
mer
genc
y pl
anni
ng a
nd p
repa
redn
ess
guid
ance
8
FEM
A /
NR
C M
OU
Are
as o
f Coo
pera
tion:
•S
uppo
rt fo
r doc
umen
t man
agem
ent s
yste
m
•O
n-go
ing
NR
C re
sear
ch a
nd d
evel
opm
ent
prog
ram
s
•P
ublic
info
rmat
ion
and
educ
atio
n pr
ogra
ms
•R
ecov
ery
from
dis
aste
rs a
ffect
ing
offs
ite e
mer
genc
y pr
epar
edne
ss
oD
isas
ter I
nitia
ted
Rev
iew
s (c
ontin
ued
reas
onab
le
assu
ranc
e)
9
Dis
aste
r Ini
tiate
d R
evie
w (D
IR)
•A
DIR
is p
erfo
rmed
if:
oA
dis
aste
r dam
ages
the
area
aro
und
a lic
ense
d nu
clea
r po
wer
pla
nt to
an
exte
nt th
at F
EM
A s
erio
usly
que
stio
nsth
e co
ntin
ued
adeq
uacy
of o
ffsite
em
erge
ncy
prep
ared
ness
•R
eaffi
rms
radi
olog
ical
em
erge
ncy
prep
ared
ness
ca
pabi
litie
s of
affe
cted
offs
ite ju
risdi
ctio
ns lo
cate
d in
th
e 10
-mile
EP
Z
•N
otin
tend
ed a
s a
com
preh
ensi
ve re
view
of o
ffsite
pl
ans
and
prep
ared
ness
10
Dis
aste
r Ini
tiate
d R
evie
w (D
IR)
•N
RC
Man
ual C
hapt
er-1
601
oO
utlin
es H
eadq
uarte
rs a
nd R
egio
nal r
oles
and
re
spon
sibi
litie
s fo
r int
erfa
cing
with
FE
MA
and
lice
nsee
•FE
MA
Dis
aste
r Ini
tiate
Rev
iew
Sta
ndar
d O
pera
ting
Gui
de (S
OG
)o
Dis
aste
r Ini
tiate
d R
evie
w T
eam
com
posi
tion
oA
sses
smen
t of O
ffsite
Cap
abili
ties
Che
cklis
t
•Fo
cus
on e
mer
genc
y re
spon
se p
rimar
y ac
tiviti
es
11
Prel
imin
ary
Cap
abili
ties
Ass
essm
ent
•Pro
vide
s op
tion
to a
sses
s im
pact
of o
ffsite
EP
in
frast
ruct
ure
prio
r to
initi
atin
g D
IRo
Dis
aste
r has
impa
cted
offs
ite E
P in
frast
ruct
ure,
but
ex
tent
unk
now
n
oIn
tend
ed to
pro
vide
a “s
nap
shot
”
•Foc
us is
FE
MA
/NR
C in
terfa
ce a
t Reg
iona
l lev
el
•Not
inte
nded
to re
plac
e or
def
er a
DIR
12
Res
tart
/ C
ontin
ued
Ope
ratio
n
Mus
t a N
PP
shu
tdow
n if
FEM
A d
eter
min
es
ther
e is
sig
nific
ant d
amag
e to
offs
ite
EP
infra
stru
ctur
e?•
A li
cens
ee is
not
requ
ired
to im
med
iate
ly s
hutd
own
due
to
degr
aded
offs
ite e
mer
genc
y in
frast
ruct
ure
•H
owev
er, e
xcee
ding
pla
nt’s
tech
nica
l spe
cific
atio
ns w
ould
re
quire
shu
tdow
n (e
.g.,
loss
of p
ower
due
to d
egra
ded
infra
stru
ctur
e)
•C
omm
issi
on c
an o
rder
shu
tdow
n if
defic
ienc
ies
of o
ffsite
E
P w
ill c
ause
“im
med
iate
” hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y co
ncer
ns
13
Res
tart
/ C
ontin
ued
Ope
ratio
n
Mus
t a li
cens
ee re
ques
t NR
C
perm
issi
on to
rest
art?
•N
o re
quire
men
t for
lice
nsee
to g
et a
ny s
peci
fic re
set
auth
oriz
atio
n w
hen
a pl
ant v
olun
taril
y an
d pr
oper
ly
shut
s do
wn
in c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith N
RC
requ
irem
ents
•C
omm
issi
on a
utho
rizat
ion
is n
eede
d to
rest
art i
f a
licen
see
exce
eded
a “s
afet
y lim
it”
oIf
a lic
ense
e w
ishe
s to
rest
art,
but t
he a
ct o
f res
tart
wou
ld c
reat
e a
non-
com
plia
nce
with
NR
C re
quire
men
ts o
r ter
ms
of th
e op
erat
ing
licen
see,
then
the
licen
see
may
not
rest
art
14
Reg
ulat
ory
Com
plia
nce
vs.
Indu
stry
Exc
elle
nce
Ow
ners
hip
of “S
ite” E
mer
genc
y P
lan
15
Reg
ulat
ory
Rev
iew
vs.
App
rova
l
•R
egul
atio
n vs
. Gui
danc
e (R
egG
uide
/ N
UR
EG /
FAQ
)•
Rev
iew
: o
Sub
mitt
ed u
nder
10
CFR
50.
4o
Req
uire
d by
NR
C re
gula
tions
(54q
, ETE
upd
ate)
•A
ppro
val:
oLi
cens
e A
men
dmen
t (un
der 1
0 C
FR 5
0.90
)o
Lice
nse
Exe
mpt
ion
(und
er 1
0 C
FR 5
0.12
)•
Bie
nnia
l Exe
rcis
e (R
IS 2
006-
03)
oR
equi
red
by N
RC
regu
latio
ns•
“Pre
-sub
mitt
al”
call
16
Reg
ulat
ory
Bas
is
•10
CFR
50.
90 (a
men
dmen
t) ap
plie
s to
lice
nsee
s se
ekin
g to
cha
nge
thei
r lic
ense
con
ditio
ns in
how
they
co
mpl
y w
ith re
gula
tions
•10
CFR
50.
12 (e
xem
ptio
n) a
pplie
s to
lice
nsee
s se
ekin
g re
gula
tory
relie
f –no
long
er n
eeds
to c
ompl
y w
ith re
gula
tion
–A
n ex
empt
ion
to th
e st
anda
rds
to 1
0 C
FR 5
0.47
(b) o
r the
re
quire
men
ts o
f App
endi
x E
to P
art 5
0, w
hich
con
stitu
te a
re
duct
ion
in e
ffect
iven
ess,
requ
ire C
omm
issi
on a
ppro
val.
17
Pla
nt A
sses
smen
t=
Per
form
ance
Indi
cato
rs+
Sig
nific
ance
Det
erm
inat
ion
Pro
cess
Q: C
apab
ility
vs.
Per
form
ance
???
Rea
ctor
Ove
rsig
ht P
roce
ss
18
Rea
ctor
Ove
rsig
ht P
roce
ss
19
Man
ual C
hapt
er 0
609,
App
endi
x B
Util
izes
risk
-info
rmed
qua
litat
ive
anal
yses
to e
stim
ate
the
risk
sign
ifica
nce
of in
spec
tion
findi
ngs
rela
ted
to
licen
see
perfo
rman
ce in
mee
ting
EP
Cor
ners
tone
•E
PS
DP
isap
plie
dto
findi
ngs
only
fort
hepu
rpos
esof
assi
gnin
ga
sign
ifica
nce
colo
r
Sign
ifica
nt D
eter
min
atio
n Pr
oces
s
20
•“R
isk
Sig
nific
ance
” of P
lann
ing
Sta
ndar
ds
•P
erfo
rman
ce d
efic
ienc
y vs
. wea
knes
s
•Fa
ilure
to c
ompl
y vs
. im
plem
ent
•Lo
ss v
s. d
egra
ded
Sign
ifica
nt D
eter
min
atio
n Pr
oces
s
21
Rul
emak
ing
Proc
ess
•A
dvan
ced
Not
ice
of R
ulem
akin
g
•P
ropo
sed
Rul
e
•Fi
nal R
ule
22
NR
C W
eb P
age
•A
bout
Em
erge
ncy
Pre
pare
dnes
s•
Abo
ut E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
•H
ow C
an I
Pre
pare
for a
R
adio
logi
cal E
mer
genc
y?•
Wha
t Do
I Do
in a
Nuc
lear
E
mer
genc
y?•
Pub
lic M
eetin
gs a
nd W
orks
hops
•R
ulem
akin
g A
ctiv
ities
•
Reg
ulat
ions
, Gui
danc
e, a
nd
Gen
eric
Com
mun
icat
ions
•R
elat
ed In
form
atio
n an
d O
ther
R
esou
rces
•N
ewsl
ette
r
Key
Top
ics
•E
mer
genc
y P
repa
redn
ess
Exe
rcis
e S
ched
ule
•FE
MA
Afte
r Act
ion
Rep
orts
•E
mer
genc
y A
ctio
n le
vel
Dev
elop
men
t•
EP
Freq
uent
ly A
sked
Que
stio
n P
roce
ss
23
http
://w
ww
.nrc
.gov
/abo
ut-n
rc/e
mer
g-pr
epar
edne
ss.h
tml
Inci
dent
Res
pons
e C
oord
inat
ion
24
NR
C’s
Inci
dent
Res
pons
e P
rogr
am
•Li
cens
ee E
vent
Rep
ortin
g to
NR
C•
NR
C S
enio
r Lea
ders
Dec
isio
n M
aker
Cal
l–
NR
C R
espo
nse
Mod
e D
ecis
ion
•N
RC
Ope
ratio
ns C
ente
rs A
ctiv
atio
n
Inci
dent
Res
pons
e C
oord
inat
ion
25
NR
C’s
Inci
dent
Res
pons
e P
rogr
am (c
ont.)
•N
RC
Res
pons
e Te
ams
Ove
rvie
w•
NR
C-IN
PO
Lia
ison
Pos
ition
–R
egio
n II
star
t–
NR
C H
Q p
erso
n as
sist
(pot
entia
l)•
Web
EO
C B
oard
Sha
ring
Inci
dent
Res
pons
e C
oord
inat
ion
26
Sou
ther
n E
xpos
ure
2015
•W
hole
Com
mun
ity C
once
pt
–Fe
dera
l Coo
rdin
atio
n A
spec
ts–
Fede
ral R
espo
nse
Ele
men
ts (F
RM
AC
, IM
AT)
•U
nifie
d C
oord
inat
ion
Gro
up–
Atte
ndan
ce b
y P
rivat
e S
ecto
r (1s
tTi
me)
•Fu
ndin
g/In
dem
nity
–P
rice
And
erso
n A
ct–
Sta
fford
Act
27
Than
k Y
ou
top related