NR

C E

mer

genc

y Pr

epar

edne

ss

and

Res

pons

e A

spec

tsIN

PO N

ew E

P M

anag

ers’

Sem

inar

Aug

ust 1

7, 2

015

Jose

ph D

. And

erso

n, C

hief

Ope

ratin

g R

eact

or L

icen

sing

and

Out

reac

h B

ranc

hO

ffice

of N

ucle

ar S

ecur

ity a

nd In

cide

nt R

espo

nse

Fran

cis

(Pau

l) Pe

duzz

i, C

hief

Coo

rdin

atio

n B

ranc

hO

ffice

of N

ucle

ar S

ecur

ity a

nd In

cide

nt R

espo

nse

Reg

ulat

ory

Bas

is

2

The

Com

mis

sion

Exe

cutiv

e D

irect

orfo

r Ope

ratio

ns (E

DO

))

Dep

uty

Exec

utiv

e D

irect

orfo

r Rea

ctor

and

Prep

ared

ness

Pro

gram

s

Dep

uty

Exe

cutiv

e D

irect

orfo

r Cor

pora

te M

anag

emen

tD

eput

y E

xecu

tive

Dire

ctor

for M

ater

ials

, Was

te, R

esea

rch,

Sta

te,

Trib

al a

nd C

ompl

ianc

e P

rogr

ams

Reg

iona

l Adm

inis

trat

ors

(Reg

ions

I, II

, III,

and

IV)

Offi

ce o

f New

Rea

ctor

s

Offi

ce o

f Nuc

lear

Se

curit

y an

d In

cide

nt

Res

pons

e

Offi

ce o

f Nuc

lear

R

eact

or R

egul

atio

n

Offi

ce o

fN

ucle

ar R

egul

ator

y R

esea

rch

Dire

ctor

Offi

ce o

fEn

forc

emen

t

Offi

ce o

fN

ucle

ar M

ater

ial

Safe

ty a

nd S

afeg

uard

s

Offi

ce o

f Inv

estig

atio

ns

Offi

ce o

fIn

form

atio

n S

ervi

ces

Offi

ce o

fA

dmin

istra

tion

Com

pute

rS

ecur

ity O

ffice

Adv

isor

y C

omm

ittee

O

n R

eact

or S

afet

y

Ato

mic

Saf

ety

and

Lice

nsin

g B

oard

•C

omm

issi

on S

EC

Y P

aper

:

Offi

ce o

f the

Sec

reta

ry (S

EC

Y) o

f the

Com

mis

sion

oN

otat

iona

l (“V

otin

g”):

Com

mis

sion

maj

ority

oIn

form

atio

nal

•S

taff

Req

uire

men

ts M

emor

andu

m (S

RM

)

3

Com

mis

sion

–St

aff I

nter

face

4

NSI

R O

rgan

izat

ion

Offi

ce o

f N

ucle

ar S

ecur

ity

and

Inci

dent

Res

pons

e(N

SIR

)

Div

isio

n of

Pr

epar

edne

ss

and

Res

pons

e(D

PR)

Div

isio

n of

S

ecur

ity O

pera

tions

(DS

O)

Div

isio

n of

Sec

urity

Pol

icy

(DS

P)

Div

isio

n of

Pre

pare

dnes

s an

d R

espo

nse

Ope

ratin

g R

eact

ors

and

Out

reac

h B

ranc

hJo

e A

nder

son,

Chi

ef(3

01) 2

87-9

300

jose

ph.a

nder

son@

nrc.

gov

Insp

ectio

n an

d R

egul

ator

yIm

prov

emen

tsB

ranc

hB

ob K

ahle

r, C

hief

(301

) 287

-375

6ro

bert

.kah

ler@

nrc.

gov

New

Rea

ctor

Li

cens

ing

Bra

nch

Alis

on R

iver

a, C

hief

(301

) 287

-375

0al

ison

.rive

ra@

nrc.

gov

Div

isio

n of

Pre

pare

dnes

s an

d R

espo

nse

Rob

ert L

ewis

, Dire

ctor

Jam

es A

nder

sen,

Dep

uty

Dire

ctor

Ope

ratio

ns B

ranc

h(H

Q O

pera

tions

Offi

cers

)B

ern

Sta

plet

on, C

hief

(301

) 287

-353

2be

rnar

d.st

aple

ton@

nrc.

gov

Coo

rdin

atio

n B

ranc

h(O

pera

tions

Cen

ter)

Pau

l Ped

uzzi

, Chi

ef(3

01) 2

87-3

787

fran

cis.

pedu

zzi@

nrc.

gov

5

FEM

A /

NR

C C

oord

inat

ion

App

endi

x A

to 4

4 C

FR 3

53“M

emor

andu

m o

f Und

erst

andi

ng (M

OU

) Bet

wee

n th

e Fe

dera

l Em

erge

ncy

Man

agem

ent A

genc

y (F

EM

A) a

nd

the

Nuc

lear

Reg

ulat

ory

Com

mis

sion

(NR

C)”

Est

ablis

hes

fram

ewor

k of

coo

pera

tion:

oA

utho

ritie

s an

d R

espo

nsib

ilitie

s

oA

reas

of C

oope

ratio

n

oN

RC

/FE

MA

Ste

erin

g C

omm

ittee

on

Em

erge

ncy

Pre

pare

dnes

s

6

FEM

A /

NR

C M

OU

FEM

A R

espo

nsib

ilitie

s:•

Lead

for o

ffsite

em

erge

ncy

plan

ning

, inc

ludi

ng th

e re

view

and

as

sess

men

t of o

ffsite

em

erge

ncy

plan

s an

d pr

epar

edne

ss fo

r ad

equa

cy

NR

C R

espo

nsib

ilitie

s:•

Ass

ess

licen

see

emer

genc

y pl

ans

for a

dequ

acy,

and

ver

ify

adeq

uate

impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

aint

enan

ce•

Rev

iew

FE

MA

find

ings

and

det

erm

inat

ions

as

to w

heth

er o

ffsite

pl

ans

are

adeq

uate

and

can

be

impl

emen

ted

•D

ecis

ions

with

rega

rds

to o

vera

ll st

ate

of e

mer

genc

y pr

epar

edne

ss (“

Con

tinue

d R

easo

nabl

e A

ssur

ance

”)

7

FEM

A /

NR

C M

OU

Are

as o

f Coo

pera

tion:

•N

RC

lice

nsin

g re

view

s

•FE

MA

revi

ew o

f offs

ite p

lans

and

pre

pare

dnes

s

•P

repa

ratio

n fo

r and

eva

luat

ion

of jo

int e

xerc

ises

•W

ithdr

awal

of r

easo

nabl

e as

sura

nce

findi

ngo

“120

day

clo

ck”

•E

mer

genc

y pl

anni

ng a

nd p

repa

redn

ess

guid

ance

8

FEM

A /

NR

C M

OU

Are

as o

f Coo

pera

tion:

•S

uppo

rt fo

r doc

umen

t man

agem

ent s

yste

m

•O

n-go

ing

NR

C re

sear

ch a

nd d

evel

opm

ent

prog

ram

s

•P

ublic

info

rmat

ion

and

educ

atio

n pr

ogra

ms

•R

ecov

ery

from

dis

aste

rs a

ffect

ing

offs

ite e

mer

genc

y pr

epar

edne

ss

oD

isas

ter I

nitia

ted

Rev

iew

s (c

ontin

ued

reas

onab

le

assu

ranc

e)

9

Dis

aste

r Ini

tiate

d R

evie

w (D

IR)

•A

DIR

is p

erfo

rmed

if:

oA

dis

aste

r dam

ages

the

area

aro

und

a lic

ense

d nu

clea

r po

wer

pla

nt to

an

exte

nt th

at F

EM

A s

erio

usly

que

stio

nsth

e co

ntin

ued

adeq

uacy

of o

ffsite

em

erge

ncy

prep

ared

ness

•R

eaffi

rms

radi

olog

ical

em

erge

ncy

prep

ared

ness

ca

pabi

litie

s of

affe

cted

offs

ite ju

risdi

ctio

ns lo

cate

d in

th

e 10

-mile

EP

Z

•N

otin

tend

ed a

s a

com

preh

ensi

ve re

view

of o

ffsite

pl

ans

and

prep

ared

ness

10

Dis

aste

r Ini

tiate

d R

evie

w (D

IR)

•N

RC

Man

ual C

hapt

er-1

601

oO

utlin

es H

eadq

uarte

rs a

nd R

egio

nal r

oles

and

re

spon

sibi

litie

s fo

r int

erfa

cing

with

FE

MA

and

lice

nsee

•FE

MA

Dis

aste

r Ini

tiate

Rev

iew

Sta

ndar

d O

pera

ting

Gui

de (S

OG

)o

Dis

aste

r Ini

tiate

d R

evie

w T

eam

com

posi

tion

oA

sses

smen

t of O

ffsite

Cap

abili

ties

Che

cklis

t

•Fo

cus

on e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se p

rimar

y ac

tiviti

es

11

Prel

imin

ary

Cap

abili

ties

Ass

essm

ent

•Pro

vide

s op

tion

to a

sses

s im

pact

of o

ffsite

EP

in

frast

ruct

ure

prio

r to

initi

atin

g D

IRo

Dis

aste

r has

impa

cted

offs

ite E

P in

frast

ruct

ure,

but

ex

tent

unk

now

n

oIn

tend

ed to

pro

vide

a “s

nap

shot

”

•Foc

us is

FE

MA

/NR

C in

terfa

ce a

t Reg

iona

l lev

el

•Not

inte

nded

to re

plac

e or

def

er a

DIR

12

Res

tart

/ C

ontin

ued

Ope

ratio

n

Mus

t a N

PP

shu

tdow

n if

FEM

A d

eter

min

es

ther

e is

sig

nific

ant d

amag

e to

offs

ite

EP

infra

stru

ctur

e?•

A li

cens

ee is

not

requ

ired

to im

med

iate

ly s

hutd

own

due

to

degr

aded

offs

ite e

mer

genc

y in

frast

ruct

ure

•H

owev

er, e

xcee

ding

pla

nt’s

tech

nica

l spe

cific

atio

ns w

ould

re

quire

shu

tdow

n (e

.g.,

loss

of p

ower

due

to d

egra

ded

infra

stru

ctur

e)

•C

omm

issi

on c

an o

rder

shu

tdow

n if

defic

ienc

ies

of o

ffsite

E

P w

ill c

ause

“im

med

iate

” hea

lth a

nd s

afet

y co

ncer

ns

13

Res

tart

/ C

ontin

ued

Ope

ratio

n

Mus

t a li

cens

ee re

ques

t NR

C

perm

issi

on to

rest

art?

•N

o re

quire

men

t for

lice

nsee

to g

et a

ny s

peci

fic re

set

auth

oriz

atio

n w

hen

a pl

ant v

olun

taril

y an

d pr

oper

ly

shut

s do

wn

in c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith N

RC

requ

irem

ents

•C

omm

issi

on a

utho

rizat

ion

is n

eede

d to

rest

art i

f a

licen

see

exce

eded

a “s

afet

y lim

it”

oIf

a lic

ense

e w

ishe

s to

rest

art,

but t

he a

ct o

f res

tart

wou

ld c

reat

e a

non-

com

plia

nce

with

NR

C re

quire

men

ts o

r ter

ms

of th

e op

erat

ing

licen

see,

then

the

licen

see

may

not

rest

art

14

Reg

ulat

ory

Com

plia

nce

vs.

Indu

stry

Exc

elle

nce

Ow

ners

hip

of “S

ite” E

mer

genc

y P

lan

15

Reg

ulat

ory

Rev

iew

vs.

App

rova

l

•R

egul

atio

n vs

. Gui

danc

e (R

egG

uide

/ N

UR

EG /

FAQ

)•

Rev

iew

: o

Sub

mitt

ed u

nder

10

CFR

50.

4o

Req

uire

d by

NR

C re

gula

tions

(54q

, ETE

upd

ate)

•A

ppro

val:

oLi

cens

e A

men

dmen

t (un

der 1

0 C

FR 5

0.90

)o

Lice

nse

Exe

mpt

ion

(und

er 1

0 C

FR 5

0.12

)•

Bie

nnia

l Exe

rcis

e (R

IS 2

006-

03)

oR

equi

red

by N

RC

regu

latio

ns•

“Pre

-sub

mitt

al”

call

16

Reg

ulat

ory

Bas

is

•10

CFR

50.

90 (a

men

dmen

t) ap

plie

s to

lice

nsee

s se

ekin

g to

cha

nge

thei

r lic

ense

con

ditio

ns in

how

they

co

mpl

y w

ith re

gula

tions

•10

CFR

50.

12 (e

xem

ptio

n) a

pplie

s to

lice

nsee

s se

ekin

g re

gula

tory

relie

f –no

long

er n

eeds

to c

ompl

y w

ith re

gula

tion

–A

n ex

empt

ion

to th

e st

anda

rds

to 1

0 C

FR 5

0.47

(b) o

r the

re

quire

men

ts o

f App

endi

x E

to P

art 5

0, w

hich

con

stitu

te a

re

duct

ion

in e

ffect

iven

ess,

requ

ire C

omm

issi

on a

ppro

val.

17

Pla

nt A

sses

smen

t=

Per

form

ance

Indi

cato

rs+

Sig

nific

ance

Det

erm

inat

ion

Pro

cess

Q: C

apab

ility

vs.

Per

form

ance

???

Rea

ctor

Ove

rsig

ht P

roce

ss

18

Rea

ctor

Ove

rsig

ht P

roce

ss

19

Man

ual C

hapt

er 0

609,

App

endi

x B

Util

izes

risk

-info

rmed

qua

litat

ive

anal

yses

to e

stim

ate

the

risk

sign

ifica

nce

of in

spec

tion

findi

ngs

rela

ted

to

licen

see

perfo

rman

ce in

mee

ting

EP

Cor

ners

tone

•E

PS

DP

isap

plie

dto

findi

ngs

only

fort

hepu

rpos

esof

assi

gnin

ga

sign

ifica

nce

colo

r

Sign

ifica

nt D

eter

min

atio

n Pr

oces

s

20

•“R

isk

Sig

nific

ance

” of P

lann

ing

Sta

ndar

ds

•P

erfo

rman

ce d

efic

ienc

y vs

. wea

knes

s

•Fa

ilure

to c

ompl

y vs

. im

plem

ent

•Lo

ss v

s. d

egra

ded

Sign

ifica

nt D

eter

min

atio

n Pr

oces

s

21

Rul

emak

ing

Proc

ess

•A

dvan

ced

Not

ice

of R

ulem

akin

g

•P

ropo

sed

Rul

e

•Fi

nal R

ule

22

NR

C W

eb P

age

•A

bout

Em

erge

ncy

Pre

pare

dnes

s•

Abo

ut E

mer

genc

y R

espo

nse

•H

ow C

an I

Pre

pare

for a

R

adio

logi

cal E

mer

genc

y?•

Wha

t Do

I Do

in a

Nuc

lear

E

mer

genc

y?•

Pub

lic M

eetin

gs a

nd W

orks

hops

•R

ulem

akin

g A

ctiv

ities

•

Reg

ulat

ions

, Gui

danc

e, a

nd

Gen

eric

Com

mun

icat

ions

•R

elat

ed In

form

atio

n an

d O

ther

R

esou

rces

•N

ewsl

ette

r

Key

Top

ics

•E

mer

genc

y P

repa

redn

ess

Exe

rcis

e S

ched

ule

•FE

MA

Afte

r Act

ion

Rep

orts

•E

mer

genc

y A

ctio

n le

vel

Dev

elop

men

t•

EP

Freq

uent

ly A

sked

Que

stio

n P

roce

ss

23

http

://w

ww

.nrc

.gov

/abo

ut-n

rc/e

mer

g-pr

epar

edne

ss.h

tml

Inci

dent

Res

pons

e C

oord

inat

ion

24

NR

C’s

Inci

dent

Res

pons

e P

rogr

am

•Li

cens

ee E

vent

Rep

ortin

g to

NR

C•

NR

C S

enio

r Lea

ders

Dec

isio

n M

aker

Cal

l–

NR

C R

espo

nse

Mod

e D

ecis

ion

•N

RC

Ope

ratio

ns C

ente

rs A

ctiv

atio

n

Inci

dent

Res

pons

e C

oord

inat

ion

25

NR

C’s

Inci

dent

Res

pons

e P

rogr

am (c

ont.)

•N

RC

Res

pons

e Te

ams

Ove

rvie

w•

NR

C-IN

PO

Lia

ison

Pos

ition

–R

egio

n II

star

t–

NR

C H

Q p

erso

n as

sist

(pot

entia

l)•

Web

EO

C B

oard

Sha

ring

Inci

dent

Res

pons

e C

oord

inat

ion

26

Sou

ther

n E

xpos

ure

2015

•W

hole

Com

mun

ity C

once

pt

–Fe

dera

l Coo

rdin

atio

n A

spec

ts–

Fede

ral R

espo

nse

Ele

men

ts (F

RM

AC

, IM

AT)

•U

nifie

d C

oord

inat

ion

Gro

up–

Atte

ndan

ce b

y P

rivat

e S

ecto

r (1s

tTi

me)

•Fu

ndin

g/In

dem

nity

–P

rice

And

erso

n A

ct–

Sta

fford

Act

27

Than

k Y

ou