mathematics adoption toolkit a data-driven review of instructional materials ccsesa california...

MATHEMATICS ADOPTION TOOLKIT

A Data-Driven Review ofInstructional Materials

CCSESACalifornia County SuperintendentsEducational Services Association

Curriculum & InstructionSteering Committee

As a state, are we ready for 2014?

As a district, are you ready for 2014?

Math Adoption Toolkit, CCSESA

This adoption must support

ALL STUDENTS

achieving proficiency

by 2014 !!!

California Adoption Process

CA Mathematics Framework - Chapter 10

Instructional Advisory Materials Panel

Curriculum Commission - Math Subcommittee

Curriculum Commission

State Board of Education

Instructional Materials Funds

Discussion:

Share past experiences or stories you have heard

from others who were ona textbook adoption committee.

A process for:

• Reviewing mathematics programs.

• Using data to identify needs.

• Matching district needs with materials.

• Supporting an informed and objective recommendation.

Section #1:District Lens

Section #3:Program Components

Section #4:Further Comparison

Resources

Section #2:Standards Sampling

Facilitator’s Guide

Section #5:Making a Decision

Introduction

Toolkit is organized around:

• What do you want students to know?

• How will students come to “know it”?

• How will you make sure ALL students “know it”?

• How will you know if your students “know it”?

Mathematics Content

Assessment

Universal Access

Instructional Program

An Introduction to the Toolkit

When purchasing

… a new car

… a mathematics program,

you want to make the “best” choice.

Whether … a new car or … a new math program

• It must be an informed choice.

• It is a long term investment.

• It must match your needs.

Introduction

2007 2014

… a car decreases in value ..a mathematics program must increase student performance.

Over time…

Introduction

Base Model• 4-wheel drive• 35 mpg• 0-60 in 20 minutes• 4 airbags• roll barOptions• Moon roof• GPS• Front seat warmers

Base Model• 50 mpg• 2 front and 2 door airbagsOptions• MP3 player• Blue tooth

Base Model• 5 doors• 4 wheel drive• 7 seats• Back seat folds down• Air conditioning• 23 mpgOptions• DVD player• individual heat controls• Sun roof

Great number of choices and options.

Introduction

State Board Approved BASIC Programs:1. CA Course 1, Course 2, Algebra I, CGP, Grades 5 - 8

2. Algebra Connections, CPM, Grade 8

3. Glencoe CA Math & Algebra I, Grades 6-8

4. Harcourt, CA HSP Math, Grades K - 6

5. Holt, CA Mathematics, Course 1, 2, Algebra I, 6 -8

6. Houghton Mifflin CA Math, Grades K - 6

7. Key Curriculum, Discovering Algebra, Grade 8

8. Kinetic Books, Algebra I, Grade 8

9. Macmillan / McGraw Hill Math, 2009 Grades K-6

10. Marshall Cavendish, Early Bird Kindergarten Math, Grade K

11. Marshall Cavendish, Primary Mathematics, Grades 1 - 5

12. McDougal Littell, CA Pre-Algebra & Algebra I, Grades 7-8

13. McDougall Littell, Course 1, Course 2, Algebra Grades 6-8

14. McDougal Littell CA Structure & Methods, Grades 6-8

15. Scott Foresman - Addison Wesley enVision Math, Grades K-6

16. Prentice Hall Mathematics CA, Grades 6-8

17. Pearson Prentice Hall CA, Algebra I, Grade 8

18. Progress in Mathematics c2008, Sadlier Oxford, Grades K-6

19. Saxon Math CA, Grades K - 6

20. SRA Real Math, SRA-McGraw Hill, Grades K-6

21. TPS, CA State Standards Aligned Program, K-3

22 Wright Group, Everyday Mathematics, Grades K-6

Introduction

Way to GoMathematics

12 ÷ 3 = 4

INTERVENTIONMathematics

12 ÷ 3 = 4

State Board Approved

INTERVENTION Programs Grades 4-7:

1. Compass Learning, Inc Odyssey Focus Math,

2. Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, California Math Triumphs,

3. Harcourt School Publishers, California Fast Forward Math,

4. iLearn Inc., iPASS Math Intervention,

5. Kaplan K-12 Learning Services, Momentum Math,

6. Riverdeep Inc., Destination Math California Intervention,

7. SRA McGraw-Hill, SRA Number Words,

8. Wright Group / McGraw Hill, Pinpoint,

Introduction

ALGEBRAREADINESS

A / B = C

State Board Approved

ALGEBRA READINESS Programs :

1. America’s Choice, Ramp-Up Algebra,

2. Compass Learning, Odyssey Focus Math: Algebra Readiness,

3. Glencoe/McGraw Hill, CA Algebra Readiness: Concepts, Skills,

and Problem Solving

4. Holt Rinehart & Winston, Holt CA Algebra Readiness,

5. iLearn, Inc., iPass Algebra Readiness,

6. JRL, I Can Learn Fundamentals of Math, Algebra, Pre-Algebra,

and Geometry,

7. McDougal Littell Algebra Readiness

8. Mind Institute, Algebra Readiness,

9. Prentice Hall Mathematics CA Algebra Readiness

10. Pearson, Connecting to Algebra for Algebra Readiness,

11. UCLA Mathematics Department, Introduction to Algebra,

Introduction

There are an overwhelming number of choices !!!

ION Textbook

ADDITION

You can do it math

Introduction

Curriculum Commission Recommended BASIC Programs:1. *

5. K-6, Brand A

5. K-6, Brand B

8. K-6, Brand C

9. K, Brand D (part 1)

10. 1-5, Brand D (part 2)

14. K-6, Brand E

16. K-6, Brand F

17. K-6, Brand G

18. K-6, Brand H

19. K-3, Brand I

20. K-6, Brand J

Number of K-6 programs

Introduction

12 ÷ 3 = 4

The Toolkit is a roadmap for making a choice.

Section #1:

District Lens

Section #2:

Standards Sampling

Section #4:

Further Comparison

Section #5:

Make a Decision

Section #3:

Program ComponentsSection #5:

Make a Decision

Section #5:

Make a Decision

Section #6:

Implementation

Adoption Process Options

Introduction

Section #6:

Implementation

Section #1:

District Lens

Section #2:

Standards Sampling

Section #6:

Implementation

Section #5:

Make a Decision

Section #1:

District Lens

Introduction

Section #3:

Program Components

Section #2:

Standards Sampling

Section #6:

Implementation

Section #5:

Make a Decision

Section #1:

District Lens

Introduction

Section #4:

Further Comparison

Section #6:

Implementation

Section #5:

Make a Decision

Section #1:

District Lens

Introduction

Section #3:

Program Components

Section #4:

Further Comparison

Section #2:

Standards Sampling

Section #6:

Implementation

Section #5:

Make a Decision

Section #1:

District Lens

Introduction

Determining the District Lens What are your district needs for:

•Students and teachers?•Content?•Assessment?•Instructional program?•Universal access?

Mathematics Adoption Toolkit Section One

Section 1: Developing the District Lens

District Lens, Task #1 - MATHEMATICS CONTENT

Questions to Consider CA Mathematics Framework 2006

1. What is the depth ofknowledge that is expectedfor students?

Students should:• develo p flue ncy i n ba sic computationa l an d procedural skills, an

understandi ng of mathemat ics concepts, a nd th e abilit y tousemathematica l reasoni ng t o solv e problem .s

• communicat e precisel .y• develo p logica l thinki .ng• mak e connections.• apply mathematics.• develo p anappreciati on fo r the beaut y a nd powe r of mathematics.

Framewor k C . h 1, . pp 2-3

Distric t progre ss towar d achievin g studen t dept h o f mathematica l knowledge:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Limite d Developi ng Successfu l Exemplary

What progress has your district made toward framework goals?

You’re going to buy a new car.

What do you need to think about before

purchasing?

What choices are essential?

Safety Air bags for everyone

Safety Structural design

Mileage Monthly savingsGas

Health Low emissions

What choices are desirable?

Trunk space

Seating for friends

76% - Second Language Learners. 71% - English Learners speak Spanish.

CELDT: Advanced 4% Early Advanced 23% Intermediate 41% Early Intermediate 22% Beginning 10%

31% of teachers are first year teachers

Discussion:

What are this district’s needs for a math program?

Discussion:

What program choices are ESSENTIAL to match this district’s data?

What program choices are DESIRABLE to match this district’s data?

Standards Sampling

What is the quality of the standards based lessons?

Mathematics Adoption ToolkitSection Two

If the engine isn’t optimal, nothing else matters !

Section 2: Standards Sampling

IMAP / CRP panels

determined that the recommended

programs include the

state standards,

and there

are no mathematical errors.

Standards Sampling

determines

the QUALITY

of how the standards

are presented in lessons.

Think about the mathematical

concepts you have struggled to teach.

Which concepts or

standards would you like to

emphasize to build student success?

Discussion:

Compare the program’s lessons for:

• Evidence of conceptual understanding.

• Evidence of procedural fluency.

• Evidence of reasoning.

• Support for new teacher.

• Support for intermediate EL.

Discussion:

What do we do with a program that has some great vocabulary

strategies and real world connections,

BUT is conceptually weak?

“ If the math isn’t good, then nothing else matters!”

J.Commons, 2006

If the standards lessons

do not meet the quality needed

by the district,

the program should

be considered for elimination.

State Board Approved BASIC Programs:1. *

5. K-6, Brand B

14. K-6, Brand E

16. K-6, Brand F

18. K-6, Brand H

19. K-3, Brand I

Number of programs afterstandards sampling

12 ÷ 3 = 4

Program Components

Mathematics Adoption Toolkit Section Three

How does the program organize:• Content ?• Assessment ?• Instructional Strategies ?• Universal Access ?

Section 3: Program Components

Base model:

Engine - V6, fuel efficient vehicle standardsDash board - guides the drive

Options

Fuel type - gas, electric, hybridSun roofMP-3 Player

Warranty Insurance AAA

Section 3: Program Components

Student Textbook

Teacher EditionsContent

Test P

Assessment Teacher Background

Practice, Reteach

Ancillary Materials

Instructional Program

ELL Support

Challenge Materials

Spec. Ed. Materials

Universal Access

Technology

Section 3: Program Component Review

www.griffithsolutions.com/mathtoolkit

12 ÷ 3 = 4

State Board Approved BASIC Programs:1. *

5. K-6, Brand B

18. K-6, Brand H

Number of programsafter programcomponent review.

Further Comparison

• Executive Committee Review

• Piloting

• Student Interviews

• Blind Testing

Mathematics Adoption Toolkit Section Four

Section 4: Further Comparison

Executive Focus Committee

Motor Trend Report

Crash Safety Tests

Consumer’s Guide

Safety + + √ -

Comfort + + √ √

Room √ + √ +

Options - √ √ -

Executive Focus Committee Parents

Middle School Teachers

English Learners SpecialistsVocab + + √ -

Structure + + √

Access √ + √ +

Discourse - √ √ -

The last two choices meet all the criteria.Now, how does each vehicle respond when driven?

How does each program respond when taught?

First I added3 to 97 to make 100

97 x 4 =

97 + 3 = 100

100 x 4 = 400

3 x 4 = 12400 -12 =

The pictureshows mewhat to do.The

definitionis on the page.

MathText

What do students say about the text(s)?

Blind Test / Side-by-side Comparison

Model HModel B

$29,670 $27,140

16 mpg city/21 mpg hwy 17 mph city /21 mph hwyautomatic 5 speed manual

4 WD FWD 5 7

4 yrs/50,000 miles 2 yrs/24,0005 yrs/60,000 miles 10 yrs/100,00012 yrs 6 yrs

Blue book

MileageTransmissionDrive TrainSeating capacity

WarrantyBasicPower trainCorrosion

Brand B Brand H

Blind Test / Side-by-side Comparison

Making a Decision

Mathematics Adoption ToolkitSection Five

• Coming to consensus

• Final report

Section 5: Making a Decision

ContentBrand B

ContentBrand H

AssessmentBrand B

AssessmentBrand H

Coming to Consensus

Brand H hasmore positives There aren’t

many negatives for B

K-6, Brand B

Section 5: Making a Decision

12 ÷ 3 = 4

What support is needed:

• Professional Development?• Planning for implementation?• Benchmarks update?• Pacing Guide update?

Mathematics Adoption Toolkit Section Six

Planning Forward

You’re in charge now. Punch it!!!

Now, the real journey begins.

Section 6: Planning Forward

Math Adoption Toolkit, CESSA

Pilot materialsStudent interviewsExecutive Focus Committee• English Learners• Assessment Department• Technology

Thank you…

CCSESACalifornia County SuperintendentsEducational Services Association

Curriculum & InstructionSteering Committee

mathematics adoption toolkit a data-driven review of instructional materials ccsesa california...

Documents

california county superintendents - fcmat

school superintendents

strong doc 2_guidelines - virginia department of web viewa...

superintendents’ quarterly meeting agenda

superintendents’ network statewide meeting

2013 superintendents salary & benefits study - aasa...

2012 superintendents' regional report

of possibilities - ccsesa arts

10-10-19 final toolkit - ccsesa

rop/cte/ccpt in contra costa county ccsesa meeting october...

advice for new superintendents

dear superintendents

draft seniority list of superintendents of...

superintendents profile september 2014

2013 superintendents ’ academy

course 3 - ccsesa

superintendents’ quarterly meeting

acknowledgements - ccsesa

superintendents’ webcast

the art of school district fiscal oversight ccsesa