superintendents’ network statewide meeting

27
Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting Richard Elmore and Liz City April 18, 2012

Upload: art

Post on 23-Feb-2016

58 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting. Richard Elmore and Liz City April 18, 2012. Being strategic. 3 questions: What, Why , How. . From Strategy in Action , R.E. Curtis and E.A. City, Harvard Education Press, 2009. Learning Goals for Today. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Superintendents’ Network Statewide

MeetingRichard Elmore and Liz City

April 18, 2012

Page 2: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Being strategic

3 questions:What, Why, How

From Strategy in Action, R.E. Curtis and E.A. City, Harvard Education Press, 2009.

Page 3: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Learning Goals for Today

• Understand rounds as a LEARNING practice• Understand how rounds connects strategy and

practice on the ground• Understand the diagnostic power of variability• Be able to dig beneath rounds data and use

that data to provide developmental feedback on your strategy

Page 4: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Agenda• Framing: Strategy, Rounds, Learning• Artifacts: Symptoms and hypotheses• Break• Digging below the surface: Root cause analysis• Lunch• A developmental framework for schools• Break• Network time: Applying learning from the day• Wrap up: Commit to a question

Page 5: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Strategy Warm-Up• 1 min.: Prepare to describe your system’s

strategy for ensuring that every learner fulfills her/his potential

• Find someone from another district whom you don’t know well; introduce yourself

• 1 min.: Each of you describes your system’s strategy. Your partner’s responsibility is to ask one clarifying question. (~30 seconds each)

• Find another person you don’t know well and repeat

• Rejoin your team. Repeat in triads.

Page 6: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Strategy—What?

• Stacey Childress’s definition: “The set of actions an organization chooses to pursue in order to achieve its objectives. These deliberate actions are puzzle pieces that fit together to create a clear picture of how the people, activities, and resources of an organization can work effectively to accomplish a collective purpose.”

--quoted in Strategy in Action, p. 3

Page 7: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Strategy—What? In your own words

• How would you define strategy in your own words?

• Write a definition• Placing bets

Page 8: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Strategy--Why?• Forces us to prioritize and make choices about what

to do and not do• Allows us to marshal resources • Focuses the system’s work and reduces “noise”• Helps the system move from where it is today to the

audacious vision you have for children

Page 9: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

What good strategy is:• A few, key carefully considered things to focus the

system’s work on that, when put together, create a powerful engine for systemic improvement

• A series of well-informed, well-educated bets• It addresses the instructional core• It balances problem solving with pursuing a vision• It is developed in partnership; many people feel a

sense of ownership of it—you can ask anyone in the system, and they’ll tell you what it is

• It evolves based on progress made, results, and learning

• If you can’t see it in the classroom, it’s not there

Page 10: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

What good strategy is not:• Everything the system does• Everything everyone wants the

system to do• A sure thing• Something static • A piece of paper, brochure, wall

chart

Page 11: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

How does rounds connect to strategy?

• Learning– Students learn best when. . .– Teachers learn best when. . .– Leaders learn best when. . .

• Every strategy has an implicit learning theory• Rounds exposes that theory to inquiry and

learning• The best strategies improve over time

Page 12: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

http://gk.oeghd.at/grako14/resources/Norman_l1.pdf

https://videos.med.wisc.edu/videos/8100

Geoff Norman

Page 13: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Artifacts

• Take out your rounds artifacts• What do you see?• What’s the emerging evidence of what’s

happening in your system?• What are your hypotheses about what’s

causing what you see in classrooms?

Page 14: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Symptoms and Hypotheses

• Symptom: Low-level tasks

• Hypotheses:– Easy to grade– How people were

trained– What’s in the book– Helps kids feel good

• Success on stand tests– Quieter is better

• Teachers have answers to tasks

• No time for conversation about tasks

• Loss of control when tasks change

• Control of class• Learning is predictable• No reason to change• Prior training

Page 15: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

No time for conversation about tasksfive whys

• Not a priority– Too much content to cover• We haven’t said what is important–Lack of agreement»Action: What will we do to reach

agreement?» Issues of control?

Page 16: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Lack of Agreement?

• Different philosophies about teaching and learning

• Different expectations for student learning• Haven’t taken the time to establish agreement– Avoidance behavior?

• This too shall pass; learned helplessness

Page 17: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Low-Level Tasks—Why?

• Teachers have answers to tasks• No time for conversation about tasks• Loss of control when tasks change

Page 18: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Root cause analysis: 5 WhysHypothesis: WHY? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?

Page 19: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Lunch

Page 20: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

So what?

• Symptom: • Hypothesis:• . . . Why?

• So what for rounds? . . .• So what for strategy? . . .

Page 21: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

A Developmental Perspective on Rounds and School Improvement

• How do you choose to focus your use of rounds for maximum impact on improvement of learning?

• How do you accommodate to important differences among schools– in rounds? in support?

• How do you use rounds to make binding commitments to the next level of work?

Page 22: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Key Assumptions

• Every school is different, but the overall strategy applies to all schools

• Improvement is growth– growth is a process, not an event

• Development occurs on multiple dimensions over time

• Tailored solutions to specific problems

Page 23: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting
Page 24: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting
Page 25: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Break

www.serpinstitute.org

Victoria: “performance and development culture” in Victoria Department of Education

Page 26: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Network TimeGiven your artifacts and your data from rounds, consider:• What are the connections between rounds

and strategy?• What are the missing pieces and big holes?• What’s the next level of work for our network?Hint: Your theory of action and data from rounds should be helpful here. You may want to revise your theory of action based on your conversation.

Page 27: Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting

Wrap-up

• Based on your learning today, what’s one question your network will commit to investigating?