logic fallacies debate class production spain park high school hoover, alabama 2011-2012 1

1

Logic Fallacies

Debate Class ProductionSpain Park High School

Hoover, Alabama2011-2012

2

ARGUMENT RESPONSE

or PERSUASION METHOD

that seems to make sense but does not really make sense

that seems to be logical but is not really logical

Definition of a Logic Fallacy

3

Ad Hominem(Personal Attack)

Definition: attacking the characterof the person advancing the argument.

http://www.logicalfallacies.info/relevance/ad-hominem/

Ad hominem arguments seek to discredit positions by discrediting thosewho hold those positions.

4

Bandwagon Fallacy Definition: proving an argument or persuading others by citing its growing popularity

5

Gambler’s FallacyDefinition: believing that a random event can become non-random

Slide by Robert James

6

Genetic FallacyDefinition: when an idea is either accepted or rejected because of its source, rather than its merit.

Source: http://www.logicalfallacies.info/relevance/genetic/

7

Moralistic FallacyDefinition: the informal fallacy of assuming that whichever aspect of nature which has socially unpleasant consequences cannot exist

8

Naturalistic FallacyDefinition: Uses statements about how things should be to prove statements about how things are.

9

Red HerringDefinition: A completely irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html

10

Weak AnalogyDefinition: comparing two or more things that aren't genuinely comparable.

Slide by Tyler Pennington

11

The following fallacies areIrrelevant Appeals.

Definition: influencing what people think without using true evidence

Slide by (Brad Prosch)

12

Appeal to Antiquity/TraditionDefinition: This fallacy assumes that older ideas are better, that the fact that an idea has been around for a while implies that it is true.

13

Appeal to AuthorityDefinition: proving or persuading by someone who claims to be an authority

14

Appeal to ConsequencesDefinition: an attempt to convince by suggesting good consequences for believing or bad consequences for not believing.

15

Appeal to ForceDefinition: an attempt to persuade using threats.

Latin name “argumentum ad baculum” literally means “argument with a cudgel”.

16

Appeal to NoveltyDefinition: claims that an idea or proposal is correct or superior, exclusively because it is new and modern

17

Appeal to PityDefinition: attempts to persuade using emotion—specifically, sympathy—rather than evidence.

18

Appeal to PopularityDefinition: an idea must be true simply because it is widely held.

This is a fallacy because popular opinion can be, and quite often is, mistaken. Hindsight makes this clear.

19

Appeal to PovertyDefinition: an argument based on how poor a person or thing is

Slide by Chandler Moore

20

Appeal to WealthDefinition: an argument that assumes that someone is better simply because they are wealthier or that something has better quality simply because it’s more expensive.

Slide by (Austin Moore)

21

Fallacy of AmbiguityDefinition: The presence of two or more possible meanings in any passage. Also, a fallacy in which the same term is used in more than one way

22

Accent FallaciesDefinition: Accent fallacies are fallacies that change the meaning of a set of words based on how they are spoken.

23

Definition: saying something must be false if there is no proof that it’s true OR saying something is true if there is no proof it is false.

Arguing from Ignorance

24

Begging the Question /Circular Reasoning

Definition: Attempt to defend a claim by using the claim itself

Slide by Emily Hale

25

Complex Question FallacyDefinition: an unfair phrasing of a question that makes it impossible to answer yes or no

26

Cum Hoc FallacyDefinition: when it is assumed that because two things occur together, they must be causally related. This, however, does not follow; correlation is possible without causation.

27

False Dilemma / Bifurcation Fallacy

Definition: A limited number of options (usually two) is given, while in reality there are more options.

28

Hasty Generalization FallacyDefinition: A hasty generalization draws a general rule from a single, perhaps atypical, case. It is the reverse of a sweeping generalization – see next slide

29

Sweeping Generalization FallacyDefinition: Applies a general statement too broadly. (different

from hasty generalization – see previous slide)

30

Post Hoc FallacyDefinition: declares proof by saying: After this, therefore because of this

31

Slippery SlopeThese arguments falsely assume that one thing must automatically lead to another.

32

Subjectivist FallacyDefinition: disbelieving a conclusion by saying it is not a fact, just an opinion

33

Tu Quoque FallacyDefinition: assuming that because someone else has done a thing, there is nothing wrong with doing it.

34

Sources

http://www.logicalfallacies.info/