elmer is not c2 ready… r u?

Post on 05-Jan-2016

33 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Elmer is not C2 Ready… R U?. The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake. R U C2 Ready? 2012 FCAT/School Grade Data. School Grade. 2011-2012. School Grade Comparison. * Eight school grades still pending. School Grade Ranges. A = 525+ B = 495-524 C = 435-494 D = 395-434 F = 394 or less - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Elmer is not C2 Ready…R U?

R U C2 Ready?2012 FCAT/School Grade Data

The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake

2011-2012

School Grade

School Grade Comparison

School Grade

Number of Schools by Year

2011 Projected by

FLDOE inFebruary

2012

2012 *

A 21 10 18B 15 9 13C 6 21 5D 1 2 1F 1 2 0* Eight school grades still pending

School Grade RangesA = 525+B = 495-524C = 435-494D = 395-434F = 394 or less

Villages = 548

School Grade SY12

Reading Math Writing Science

Meeting High Standards

100 100 100 100

Annual Learning Gains 100 100 Total: 800Lowest Quartile Gains 100 100 AGrade:

School Grade SY12 – Performance

Reading Math Writing Science

Meeting High Standards

100 100 100 100

Annual Learning Gains 100 100 Total: 800Lowest Quartile Gains 100 100 AGrade:

School Grade SY12 – Gains

Reading Math Writing Science

Meeting High Standards

100 100 100 100

Annual Learning Gains 100 100 Total: 800Lowest Quartile Gains 100 100 AGrade:

School Grade RangesA = 525+B = 495-524C = 435-494D = 395-434F = 394 or less

School Grade SY12

Reading Math Writing Science

Meeting High Standards

67(-20) 72(-14) 80(-6) 62(-5)

Annual Learning Gains 61(-16) 75(E) Total: 548Lowest Quartile Gains 62(+2) 69(-1)

(-60)

AGrade:

School Grades SY12New, tougher test – FCAT 2.0:

Summer, 2011Raised cut scores: December, 2011Changed school grade calculations

to include ALL students (SWD, and ELL): February 2012

School Grade SY12

Reading Math Writing Science

Meeting High Standards

67(-20) 72(-14) 80(-6) 62(-5)

Annual Learning Gains 61(-16) 75(E) Total: 548Lowest Quartile Gains 62(+2) 69(-1)

(-60)

AGrade:

2011-2012

FCAT Scores – District and State Comparison

Grade 3 Comparison to District and State Averages - ReadingMean Scale Score:

Villages – 203Lake – 201Florida – 201

% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 65%Lake – 56%Florida – 56%

% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 13%Lake – 17%Florida – 18%

Grade 3 Comparison to District and State Averages - MathMean Scale Score:

Villages – 207Lake – 201Florida – 202

% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 68%Lake – 56%Florida – 58%

% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 15%Lake – 18%Florida – 18%

Grade 4 Comparison to District and State Averages - ReadingMean Scale Score:

Villages – 215Lake – 213Florida – 213

% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 65%Lake – 61%Florida – 62%

% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 8%Lake – 12%Florida – 13%

Grade 4 Comparison to District and State Averages - MathMean Scale Score:

Villages – 220Lake – 214Florida – 215

% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 71%Lake – 60%Florida – 60%

% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 15%Lake – 18%Florida – 18%

Grade 5 Comparison to District and State Averages - ReadingMean Scale Score:

Villages – 223Lake – 220Florida – 221

% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 65%Lake – 60%Florida – 61%

% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 12%Lake – 15%Florida – 15%

Grade 5 Comparison to District and State Averages - MathMean Scale Score:

Villages – 229Lake – 221Florida – 222

% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 71%Lake – 55%Florida – 57%

% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 12%Lake – 19%Florida – 19%

Grade 5 Comparison to District and State Averages - ScienceMean Scale Score:

Villages – 335Lake – 321Florida – 322

% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 60%Lake – 49%Florida – 51%

% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 12%Lake – 19%Florida – 20%

Grade 4 Comparison to District and State Averages - WritingAverage Score

Villages – 3.2Lake – 3.2Florida – 3.3

% Scoring Level 3 and UpVillages – 78%Lake – 79%Florida – 81%

% Scoring Level 3.5 and UpVillages – 39%Lake – 44%Florida – 48%

% Scoring Level 4.0 and UpVillages – 22%Lake – 24%Florida – 27%

2011 Performance

2012 Performance

GOALS FOR 2013 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Proficiency 66 56 59 56 61 60 56 56 54 49 45Learning Gains 59 64 67Learning Gains, Low 25% 56 66 69

Proficiency 71 57 60 56 60 55 51 52 52Learning Gains 67 66 69Learing Gains, Low 25% 63 64 67Percentage at Level 4 and above 80 82Percentage at Level 3.5 and abovePercentage at Level 3.0 and above 79* 44 48 49

SCIENCEProficiency 48 49 52 49 47

Total Points 510 501 525

* The State Board of Education changed the proficiency requirement for Wrting to Level 3.0 for the 2011-2012 School Year.

Performance Results by Grade Level Based on District FCAT 2.0 Reading, Math, Science and Writing Results for ALL Students by Grade LevelDISTRICT GRADE

MATH

WRITING

READING

LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS DISTRICT STUDENT PERFORMANCE FOCUS AREAS

GOALS FOR 2012-2013 - R U C2 READY?

top related