children's services management report...children’s services management report i research and...
Post on 23-Aug-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Department of Social Services Children's Division
Children's Services Management Report
June 2020
Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis
221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Children’s Services Management Report
I Research and Data Analysis
State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:
“We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure and sustain healthy, safe, and productive lives." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.
Children’s Services Management Report II Research and Data Analysis
Table of Contents
Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only.
Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month
to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values.
Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V
Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N)
Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those
Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2
Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4
Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6
Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8
Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10
Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12
Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................ 14
Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years.............................................................. 14
Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................. 15
Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 15
Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 16
Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments
Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16
Figure 8a. CA/N Investigations Completed During the Month ....................................................... 17
Figure 8b. CA/N Assessments Completed During the Month ......................................................... 17
Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18
Family-Centered Services (FCS)
Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 22
Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24
Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ............................................... 26
Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 28
Children’s Services Management Report III Research and Data Analysis
Table 11. FCS Cases By Region Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................. 30
Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 32
Table 13. FCS Cases By Region Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement . 34
Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 36
Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases by Region Active as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................ 36
Figure 11. FCS Cases by Region Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................... 37
Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 37
Figure 13. FCS Cases by Region Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................... 38
Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement
By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38
Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 39
Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 40
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 44
Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ............................................... 46
Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ............... 48
Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Length of Stay and Region ........................................................................................ 49
Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month
By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 50
Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case
Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 52
Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Type......................................................................... 54
Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Placement Category and Case Manager County........................................................... 64
Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month
Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 66
Children’s Services Management Report IV Research and Data Analysis
Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 68
Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type ........................... 70
Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 72
Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 74
Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements..................................... 76
Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 78
Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................ 80
Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During
the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 80
Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 81
Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 81
Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 82
Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 82
Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and
Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 83
Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 84
Intensive In-Home Services (IIS)
Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 90
Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 92
Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 94
Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 96
Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 98
Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 100
Children’s Services Management Report V Research and Data Analysis
Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions
Northeast
Northwest
Kansas City
St. Louis
Southwest
Southeast
Child Abuse and Neglect
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During June 2020
Compared to Those Reported During June 2019
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Northwest Andrew 6 9 -33.33% 10 9 11.11%
Atchison 2 2 0.00% 2 7 -71.43%
Buchanan 85 108 -21.30% 137 146 -6.16%
Caldwell 4 4 0.00% 9 4 125.00%
Carroll 2 13 -84.62% 2 17 -88.24%
Cass 56 55 1.82% 64 70 -8.57%
Chariton 1 1 0.00% 1 1 0.00%
Clay 103 104 -0.96% 136 126 7.94%
Clinton 12 8 50.00% 16 10 60.00%
Cooper 10 7 42.86% 22 9 144.44%
Daviess 5 6 -16.67% 6 7 -14.29%
De Kalb 3 10 -70.00% 7 14 -50.00%
Gentry 6 6 0.00% 14 6 133.33%
Grundy 7 8 -12.50% 11 11 0.00%
Harrison 9 5 80.00% 15 5 200.00%
Holt 1 3 -66.67% 1 5 -80.00%
Johnson 28 30 -6.67% 47 42 11.90%
Lafayette 15 18 -16.67% 23 20 15.00%
Linn 10 7 42.86% 14 13 7.69%
Livingston 15 6 150.00% 18 7 157.14%
Mercer 2 2 0.00% 2 2 0.00%
Nodaway 11 12 -8.33% 20 14 42.86%
Pettis 32 31 3.23% 40 40 0.00%
Platte 40 45 -11.11% 45 60 -25.00%
Putnam 2 4 -50.00% 2 4 -50.00%
Ray 15 13 15.38% 19 20 -5.00%
Saline 23 18 27.78% 39 24 62.50%
Sullivan 7 2 250.00% 12 2 500.00%
Worth 0 1 -100.00% 0 1 -100.00%
* Region Total * 512 538 -4.83% 734 696 5.46%
Northeast Adair 18 18 0.00% 25 29 -13.79%
Audrain 25 14 78.57% 45 22 104.55%
Boone 74 96 -22.92% 108 128 -15.63%
Callaway 27 30 -10.00% 41 48 -14.58%
Clark 8 5 60.00% 12 7 71.43%
Cole 39 44 -11.36% 47 59 -20.34%
Franklin 55 77 -28.57% 83 111 -25.23%
Gasconade 12 12 0.00% 15 19 -21.05%
Howard 8 4 100.00% 10 6 66.67%
Knox 1 1 0.00% 4 1 300.00%
Lewis 11 6 83.33% 12 6 100.00%
Lincoln 46 51 -9.80% 65 69 -5.80%
Macon 7 20 -65.00% 9 32 -71.88%
Marion 18 21 -14.29% 24 32 -25.00%
Monroe 5 3 66.67% 6 3 100.00%
Montgomery 6 14 -57.14% 8 20 -60.00%
Osage 4 4 0.00% 5 5 0.00%
Pike 7 9 -22.22% 10 11 -9.09%
Ralls 1 2 -50.00% 1 2 -50.00%
Randolph 21 28 -25.00% 27 42 -35.71%
Schuyler 3 3 0.00% 4 5 -20.00%
Scotland 2 3 -33.33% 3 5 -40.00%
Shelby 4 4 0.00% 10 6 66.67%
St Charles 103 126 -18.25% 146 175 -16.57%
Warren 16 30 -46.67% 24 38 -36.84%
* Region Total * 521 625 -16.64% 744 881 -15.55%
Southeast Bollinger 5 8 -37.50% 5 13 -61.54%
Butler 34 44 -22.73% 45 65 -30.77%
Cape Girardeau 46 31 48.39% 64 48 33.33%
Carter 5 4 25.00% 7 7 0.00%
Crawford 15 28 -46.43% 22 38 -42.11%
Dent 11 10 10.00% 17 12 41.67%
2Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During June 2020
Compared to Those Reported During June 2019
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Southeast Dunklin 16 32 -50.00% 29 56 -48.21%
Howell 33 50 -34.00% 50 73 -31.51%
Iron 7 8 -12.50% 11 11 0.00%
Jefferson 77 129 -40.31% 100 178 -43.82%
Madison 5 9 -44.44% 7 11 -36.36%
Maries 4 6 -33.33% 5 8 -37.50%
Mississippi 12 9 33.33% 16 11 45.45%
New Madrid 11 16 -31.25% 15 26 -42.31%
Oregon 6 13 -53.85% 6 21 -71.43%
Pemiscot 14 15 -6.67% 17 28 -39.29%
Perry 12 12 0.00% 17 22 -22.73%
Phelps 31 29 6.90% 40 38 5.26%
Pulaski 31 31 0.00% 48 45 6.67%
Reynolds 7 11 -36.36% 10 16 -37.50%
Ripley 13 12 8.33% 19 16 18.75%
Scott 30 37 -18.92% 38 59 -35.59%
Shannon 8 9 -11.11% 13 14 -7.14%
St Francois 65 53 22.64% 82 72 13.89%
Ste Genevieve 16 5 220.00% 22 7 214.29%
Stoddard 19 39 -51.28% 29 56 -48.21%
Texas 14 21 -33.33% 14 33 -57.58%
Washington 13 21 -38.10% 19 31 -38.71%
Wayne 10 13 -23.08% 17 16 6.25%
* Region Total * 570 705 -19.15% 784 1,031 -23.96%
Southwest Barry 37 19 94.74% 56 28 100.00%
Barton 7 6 16.67% 7 6 16.67%
Bates 8 11 -27.27% 14 19 -26.32%
Benton 7 10 -30.00% 10 19 -47.37%
Camden 26 34 -23.53% 39 58 -32.76%
Cedar 21 7 200.00% 34 10 240.00%
Christian 55 49 12.24% 82 75 9.33%
Dade 2 4 -50.00% 2 5 -60.00%
Dallas 13 10 30.00% 21 13 61.54%
Douglas 4 9 -55.56% 5 13 -61.54%
Greene 280 289 -3.11% 376 407 -7.62%
Henry 26 21 23.81% 41 27 51.85%
Hickory 5 6 -16.67% 6 7 -14.29%
Jasper 110 109 0.92% 145 155 -6.45%
Laclede 40 42 -4.76% 52 59 -11.86%
Lawrence 30 36 -16.67% 45 48 -6.25%
McDonald 16 16 0.00% 25 30 -16.67%
Miller 21 26 -19.23% 31 47 -34.04%
Moniteau 8 11 -27.27% 10 12 -16.67%
Morgan 16 17 -5.88% 29 24 20.83%
Newton 36 32 12.50% 45 42 7.14%
Ozark 6 9 -33.33% 13 17 -23.53%
Polk 29 33 -12.12% 43 41 4.88%
St Clair 8 4 100.00% 11 5 120.00%
Stone 23 23 0.00% 26 31 -16.13%
Taney 42 51 -17.65% 54 70 -22.86%
Vernon 20 15 33.33% 32 23 39.13%
Webster 25 25 0.00% 33 35 -5.71%
Wright 17 26 -34.62% 20 39 -48.72%
* Region Total * 938 950 -1.26% 1,307 1,365 -4.25%
Kansas City Jackson 468 526 -11.03% 681 731 -6.84%
* Region Total * 468 526 -11.03% 681 731 -6.84%
St. Louis St Louis City 178 207 -14.01% 261 307 -14.98%
St Louis County 318 335 -5.07% 448 493 -9.13%
* Region Total * 496 542 -8.49% 709 800 -11.38%
Other Out Home Inv 90 125 -28.00% 143 163 -12.27%
Out Of State 15 9 66.67% 21 13 61.54%
Stat Unit 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%
* Region Total * 105 134 -21.64% 164 176 -6.82%
State Total 3,610 4,020 -10.20% 5,123 5,680 -9.81%
3Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During June 2020
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Northwest Andrew 1 0 1 8 0 10 0.24 2.40
Atchison 1 0 0 3 0 4 0.85 3.38
Buchanan 8 2 33 59 2 104 0.38 4.96
Caldwell 1 1 0 2 0 4 0.42 1.66
Carroll 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00 2.28
Cass 4 1 12 46 0 63 0.15 2.39
Chariton 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.57
Clay 1 6 19 60 1 87 0.02 1.52
Clinton 1 1 3 3 0 8 0.20 1.57
Cooper 0 0 3 14 0 17 0.00 4.27
Daviess 0 0 0 7 0 7 0.00 3.11
De Kalb 0 0 1 1 2 4 0.00 1.73
Gentry 1 0 1 0 0 2 0.60 1.21
Grundy 1 0 2 2 0 5 0.41 2.03
Harrison 0 0 0 8 1 9 0.00 4.05
Holt 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 1.03
Johnson 0 1 12 25 0 38 0.00 3.16
Lafayette 3 0 0 3 0 6 0.37 0.73
Linn 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.32
Livingston 0 0 3 2 1 6 0.00 1.80
Mercer 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 2.08
Nodaway 0 0 3 7 0 10 0.00 2.35
Pettis 9 0 9 25 0 43 0.83 3.99
Platte 1 0 5 32 2 40 0.05 1.82
Putnam 1 0 0 8 0 9 0.86 7.76
Ray 2 0 3 12 0 17 0.34 2.90
Saline 0 3 10 9 0 22 0.00 4.08
Sullivan 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.62
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 1 2.25 2.25
* Region Total * 36 16 121 345 9 527 0.17 2.43
Northeast Adair 4 4 0 13 0 21 0.80 4.22
Audrain 0 1 4 9 1 15 0.00 2.36
Boone 13 2 34 79 8 136 0.38 3.97
Callaway 4 1 13 25 0 43 0.40 4.30
Clark 1 0 0 4 0 5 0.58 2.91
Cole 5 1 8 29 0 43 0.28 2.40
Franklin 10 2 16 61 6 95 0.40 3.78
Gasconade 1 0 4 10 0 15 0.30 4.46
Howard 0 0 1 9 0 10 0.00 4.59
Knox 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 2.91
Lewis 0 2 1 4 0 7 0.00 2.92
Lincoln 15 1 19 39 0 74 1.02 5.03
Macon 5 0 0 5 0 10 1.32 2.65
Marion 6 4 0 18 2 30 0.87 4.36
Monroe 0 1 2 2 1 6 0.00 2.91
Montgomery 3 0 3 11 0 17 1.05 5.96
Osage 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 0.58
Pike 7 0 4 18 0 29 1.70 7.06
Ralls 1 0 0 2 0 3 0.42 1.26
Randolph 1 1 7 11 1 21 0.17 3.57
Schuyler 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.00 1.75
Scotland 2 0 3 0 0 5 1.47 3.67
Shelby 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.00 1.88
St Charles 28 3 32 65 2 130 0.30 1.40
Warren 3 2 10 14 2 31 0.37 3.81
* Region Total * 109 27 163 434 23 756 0.42 2.90
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 14 0 14 0.00 4.80
Butler 5 4 27 40 2 78 0.50 7.82
Cape Girardeau 7 1 2 17 0 27 0.42 1.63
Carter 1 0 1 3 0 5 0.66 3.30
Crawford 1 1 1 13 0 16 0.17 2.67
Dent 0 0 8 19 3 30 0.00 8.21
4Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During June 2020
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Southeast Dunklin 0 0 7 25 0 32 0.00 3.96
Howell 3 2 11 33 2 51 0.30 5.07
Iron 3 0 2 9 0 14 1.25 5.83
Jefferson 10 6 19 140 4 179 0.18 3.26
Madison 2 0 7 4 0 13 0.68 4.44
Maries 1 0 1 6 0 8 0.46 3.71
Mississippi 1 0 3 8 0 12 0.31 3.76
New Madrid 1 0 4 8 0 13 0.22 2.88
Oregon 4 0 4 10 4 22 1.65 9.07
Pemiscot 4 0 5 7 0 16 0.79 3.18
Perry 0 0 0 6 0 6 0.00 1.26
Phelps 1 1 6 18 5 31 0.10 3.17
Pulaski 1 5 5 22 0 33 0.08 2.63
Reynolds 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 1.96
Ripley 0 0 2 14 1 17 0.00 5.14
Scott 3 2 0 19 0 24 0.30 2.44
Shannon 1 0 1 4 0 6 0.51 3.04
St Francois 4 1 15 48 0 68 0.28 4.72
Ste Genevieve 0 0 6 14 1 21 0.00 4.98
Stoddard 4 0 2 16 2 24 0.59 3.51
Texas 3 5 6 3 0 17 0.52 2.97
Washington 5 2 3 17 0 27 0.82 4.45
Wayne 0 1 1 6 0 8 0.00 2.85
* Region Total * 65 31 149 546 24 815 0.30 3.70
Southwest Barry 2 3 13 37 5 60 0.23 6.94
Barton 4 0 0 7 0 11 1.24 3.42
Bates 3 7 0 13 0 23 0.71 5.41
Benton 4 0 0 12 1 17 1.16 4.95
Camden 1 0 3 17 0 21 0.12 2.50
Cedar 2 0 2 10 2 16 0.60 4.84
Christian 1 0 13 24 0 38 0.05 1.79
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 1 0 6 6 1 14 0.24 3.36
Douglas 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.00 0.98
Greene 23 1 97 249 4 374 0.39 6.41
Henry 0 0 4 7 0 11 0.00 2.22
Hickory 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 1.80
Jasper 4 1 24 65 6 100 0.13 3.30
Laclede 6 5 15 29 0 55 0.67 6.17
Lawrence 2 0 17 35 0 54 0.20 5.31
McDonald 0 7 5 14 0 26 0.00 4.02
Miller 4 1 2 6 0 13 0.65 2.12
Moniteau 1 0 2 9 0 12 0.25 3.06
Morgan 0 1 4 10 0 15 0.00 3.31
Newton 0 3 7 15 1 26 0.00 1.76
Ozark 0 2 1 6 0 9 0.00 4.62
Polk 0 1 8 31 1 41 0.00 5.35
St Clair 1 0 1 3 0 5 0.51 2.55
Stone 1 0 9 18 0 28 0.17 4.64
Taney 3 1 10 37 2 53 0.26 4.64
Vernon 7 0 7 16 5 35 1.33 6.65
Webster 2 3 7 47 2 61 0.20 6.08
Wright 2 0 13 14 0 29 0.41 5.95
* Region Total * 74 36 271 742 30 1,153 0.28 4.42
Kansas City Jackson 33 14 137 311 34 529 0.20 3.19
* Region Total * 33 14 137 311 34 529 0.20 3.19
St. Louis St Louis City 13 5 52 76 13 159 0.19 2.35
St Louis County 45 16 248 632 73 1,014 0.19 4.33
* Region Total * 58 21 300 708 86 1,173 0.19 3.89
Other Out Home Inv 11 0 79 21 6 117 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 11 0 79 21 6 117 0.00 0.00
State Total 386 145 1,220 3,107 212 5,070 0.27 3.56
5Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During June 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8
Atchison 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Buchanan 3 4.84% 1 1.61% 21 33.87% 37 59.68% 0 0.00% 62
Caldwell 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cass 2 4.35% 1 2.17% 12 26.09% 31 67.39% 0 0.00% 46
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clay 1 1.49% 4 5.97% 15 22.39% 46 68.66% 1 1.49% 67
Clinton 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 8 80.00% 0 0.00% 10
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
Gentry 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Grundy 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Johnson 0 0.00% 1 4.55% 6 27.27% 15 68.18% 0 0.00% 22
Lafayette 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
Pettis 7 24.14% 0 0.00% 7 24.14% 15 51.72% 0 0.00% 29
Platte 1 3.23% 0 0.00% 5 16.13% 24 77.42% 1 3.23% 31
Putnam 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ray 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 3 23.08% 8 61.54% 0 0.00% 13
Saline 0 0.00% 1 6.67% 7 46.67% 7 46.67% 0 0.00% 15
Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 27 7.48% 10 2.77% 91 25.21% 228 63.16% 5 1.39% 361
Northeast Adair 1 9.09% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11
Audrain 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 3 27.27% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11
Boone 10 9.17% 2 1.84% 29 26.61% 62 56.88% 6 5.51% 109
Callaway 4 12.12% 1 3.03% 11 33.33% 17 51.52% 0 0.00% 33
Clark 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Cole 5 13.89% 1 2.78% 6 16.67% 24 66.67% 0 0.00% 36
Franklin 6 9.52% 1 1.59% 15 23.81% 39 61.91% 2 3.18% 63
Gasconade 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 7 87.50% 0 0.00% 8
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lewis 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6
Lincoln 12 22.22% 1 1.85% 13 24.07% 28 51.85% 0 0.00% 54
Macon 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 6
Marion 4 22.22% 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 10 55.56% 1 5.56% 18
Monroe 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Montgomery 3 23.08% 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 8 61.54% 0 0.00% 13
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pike 4 26.67% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 15
Ralls 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Randolph 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 8 50.00% 1 6.25% 16
Schuyler 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 16 16.50% 3 3.09% 21 21.65% 55 56.70% 2 2.06% 97
Warren 3 15.00% 1 5.00% 5 25.00% 10 50.00% 1 5.00% 20
* Region Total * 74 13.60% 21 3.86% 122 22.43% 314 57.72% 13 2.39% 544
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7
Butler 4 8.00% 3 6.00% 15 30.00% 26 52.00% 2 4.00% 50
Cape Girardeau 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 11.11% 13 72.22% 0 0.00% 18
Carter 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Crawford 1 8.33% 1 8.33% 1 8.33% 9 75.00% 0 0.00% 12
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 33.33% 12 66.67% 0 0.00% 18
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment
6Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During June 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 28.57% 15 71.43% 0 0.00% 21
Howell 3 8.82% 1 2.94% 6 17.65% 22 64.71% 2 5.88% 34
Iron 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6
Jefferson 6 4.58% 4 3.05% 16 12.21% 102 77.86% 3 2.29% 131
Madison 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8
Maries 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Mississippi 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8
New Madrid 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 10
Oregon 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 1 9.09% 11
Pemiscot 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 10
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Phelps 1 4.76% 1 4.76% 3 14.29% 13 61.91% 3 14.29% 21
Pulaski 1 4.55% 4 18.18% 4 18.18% 13 59.09% 0 0.00% 22
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 11 78.57% 1 7.14% 14
Scott 3 18.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 12 75.00% 0 0.00% 16
Shannon 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
St Francois 4 8.33% 1 2.08% 11 22.92% 32 66.67% 0 0.00% 48
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 45.46% 6 54.55% 0 0.00% 11
Stoddard 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 12.50% 10 62.50% 2 12.50% 16
Texas 2 13.33% 4 26.67% 6 40.00% 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 15
Washington 3 18.75% 2 12.50% 2 12.50% 9 56.25% 0 0.00% 16
Wayne 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7
* Region Total * 44 8.02% 23 4.19% 107 19.49% 361 65.76% 14 2.55% 549
Southwest Barry 1 2.78% 2 5.56% 10 27.78% 21 58.33% 2 5.56% 36
Barton 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Bates 2 12.50% 4 25.00% 0 0.00% 10 62.50% 0 0.00% 16
Benton 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 76.92% 1 7.69% 13
Camden 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 3 15.79% 15 78.95% 0 0.00% 19
Cedar 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 8 61.54% 1 7.69% 13
Christian 1 3.13% 0 0.00% 12 37.50% 19 59.38% 0 0.00% 32
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 6 46.15% 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 13
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Greene 18 6.79% 1 0.38% 67 25.28% 175 66.04% 4 1.51% 265
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jasper 4 4.94% 1 1.24% 22 27.16% 49 60.49% 5 6.17% 81
Laclede 5 14.71% 2 5.88% 9 26.47% 18 52.94% 0 0.00% 34
Lawrence 1 2.86% 0 0.00% 12 34.29% 22 62.86% 0 0.00% 35
McDonald 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 4 26.67% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 15
Miller 4 33.33% 1 8.33% 2 16.67% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 12
Moniteau 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8
Morgan 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Newton 0 0.00% 1 4.35% 7 30.44% 14 60.87% 1 4.35% 23
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
Polk 0 0.00% 1 5.00% 5 25.00% 13 65.00% 1 5.00% 20
St Clair 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Stone 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 4 18.18% 17 77.27% 0 0.00% 22
Taney 3 7.50% 1 2.50% 6 15.00% 29 72.50% 1 2.50% 40
Vernon 5 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 20.00% 9 45.00% 2 10.00% 20
Webster 2 5.41% 2 5.41% 4 10.81% 27 72.97% 2 5.41% 37
Wright 2 10.53% 0 0.00% 10 52.63% 7 36.84% 0 0.00% 19
* Region Total * 60 7.40% 20 2.47% 197 24.29% 514 63.38% 20 2.47% 811
Kansas City Jackson 24 6.70% 9 2.51% 99 27.65% 207 57.82% 19 5.31% 358
* Region Total * 24 6.70% 9 2.51% 99 27.65% 207 57.82% 19 5.31% 358
St. Louis St Louis City 11 9.24% 4 3.36% 35 29.41% 58 48.74% 11 9.24% 119
St Louis County 37 4.88% 10 1.32% 193 25.43% 474 62.45% 45 5.93% 759
* Region Total * 48 5.47% 14 1.60% 228 25.97% 532 60.59% 56 6.38% 878
Other Out Home Inv 6 8.45% 0 0.00% 52 73.24% 13 18.31% 0 0.00% 71
* Region Total * 6 8.45% 0 0.00% 52 73.24% 13 18.31% 0 0.00% 71
State Total 283 7.92% 97 2.72% 896 25.08% 2,169 60.72% 127 3.56% 3,572
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment Other
7Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During June 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Atchison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Buchanan 58 93.55% 4 6.45% 0 0.00% 62
Caldwell 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Carroll 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cass 44 95.65% 2 4.35% 0 0.00% 46
Chariton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clay 63 95.46% 1 1.52% 2 3.03% 66
Clinton 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Cooper 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Daviess 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
De Kalb 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Gentry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Grundy 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Harrison 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Holt 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Johnson 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22
Lafayette 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Livingston 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Mercer 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Nodaway 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Pettis 29 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 29
Platte 27 90.00% 3 10.00% 0 0.00% 30
Putnam 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ray 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13
Saline 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15
Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 341 95.79% 13 3.65% 2 0.56% 356
Northeast Adair 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Audrain 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11
Boone 75 72.82% 28 27.18% 0 0.00% 103
Callaway 31 93.94% 2 6.06% 0 0.00% 33
Clark 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cole 34 94.44% 2 5.56% 0 0.00% 36
Franklin 46 75.41% 13 21.31% 2 3.28% 61
Gasconade 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lewis 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Lincoln 49 90.74% 5 9.26% 0 0.00% 54
Macon 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Marion 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17
Monroe 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Montgomery 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13
Osage 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pike 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15
Ralls 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Randolph 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Shelby 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 85 89.47% 7 7.37% 3 3.16% 95
Warren 14 73.68% 5 26.32% 0 0.00% 19
* Region Total * 453 85.31% 73 13.75% 5 0.94% 531
Southeast Bollinger 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Butler 44 91.67% 4 8.33% 0 0.00% 48
Cape Girardeau 15 83.33% 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 18
Carter 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Crawford 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Dent 13 72.22% 5 27.78% 0 0.00% 18
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
8Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During June 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 20 95.24% 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 21
Howell 30 93.75% 2 6.25% 0 0.00% 32
Iron 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Jefferson 103 80.47% 24 18.75% 1 0.78% 128
Madison 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Maries 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Mississippi 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
New Madrid 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Oregon 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10
Pemiscot 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10
Perry 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Phelps 14 77.78% 4 22.22% 0 0.00% 18
Pulaski 18 81.82% 3 13.64% 1 4.55% 22
Reynolds 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ripley 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13
Scott 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16
Shannon 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
St Francois 46 95.83% 2 4.17% 0 0.00% 48
Ste Genevieve 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Stoddard 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14
Texas 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Washington 14 87.50% 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 16
Wayne 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
* Region Total * 468 87.48% 64 11.96% 3 0.56% 535
Southwest Barry 32 94.12% 2 5.88% 0 0.00% 34
Barton 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Bates 13 81.25% 1 6.25% 2 12.50% 16
Benton 9 75.00% 2 16.67% 1 8.33% 12
Camden 15 78.95% 4 21.05% 0 0.00% 19
Cedar 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Christian 29 90.63% 3 9.38% 0 0.00% 32
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 12 92.31% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13
Douglas 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Greene 225 86.21% 34 13.03% 2 0.77% 261
Henry 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Hickory 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jasper 71 93.42% 5 6.58% 0 0.00% 76
Laclede 27 79.41% 7 20.59% 0 0.00% 34
Lawrence 32 91.43% 3 8.57% 0 0.00% 35
McDonald 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Miller 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12
Moniteau 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Morgan 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Newton 22 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22
Ozark 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Polk 14 73.68% 5 26.32% 0 0.00% 19
St Clair 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Stone 21 95.46% 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 22
Taney 38 97.44% 1 2.56% 0 0.00% 39
Vernon 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18
Webster 30 85.71% 5 14.29% 0 0.00% 35
Wright 18 94.74% 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 19
* Region Total * 707 89.38% 78 9.86% 6 0.76% 791
Kansas City Jackson 276 81.42% 50 14.75% 13 3.84% 339
* Region Total * 276 81.42% 50 14.75% 13 3.84% 339
St. Louis St Louis City 61 56.48% 47 43.52% 0 0.00% 108
St Louis County 417 61.14% 232 34.02% 33 4.84% 682
* Region Total * 478 60.51% 279 35.32% 33 4.18% 790
Other Out Home Inv 68 95.78% 3 4.23% 0 0.00% 71
* Region Total * 68 95.78% 3 4.23% 0 0.00% 71
State Total 2,791 81.78% 560 16.41% 62 1.82% 3,413
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
9Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During June 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Atchison 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Buchanan 18 31.03% 7 12.07% 33 56.90% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 58
Caldwell 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cass 12 27.91% 3 6.98% 28 65.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 43
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clay 20 31.25% 1 1.56% 43 67.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 64
Clinton 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Cooper 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 5 50.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 10
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
De Kalb 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Gentry 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Grundy 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Harrison 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Johnson 6 31.58% 1 5.26% 12 63.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19
Lafayette 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Livingston 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Mercer 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Nodaway 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Pettis 8 28.57% 6 21.43% 6 21.43% 6 21.43% 2 7.14% 28
Platte 5 16.67% 1 3.33% 24 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 30
Putnam 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Ray 5 38.46% 0 0.00% 8 61.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13
Saline 6 40.00% 2 13.33% 6 40.00% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15
Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 102 29.65% 29 8.43% 200 58.14% 10 2.91% 3 0.87% 344
Northeast Adair 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Audrain 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Boone 18 18.18% 24 24.24% 35 35.35% 4 4.04% 18 18.18% 99
Callaway 9 29.03% 7 22.58% 15 48.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 31
Clark 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cole 7 21.21% 5 15.15% 21 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33
Franklin 13 22.03% 9 15.25% 36 61.02% 1 1.70% 0 0.00% 59
Gasconade 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Howard 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 6 85.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lewis 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Lincoln 20 38.46% 6 11.54% 24 46.15% 0 0.00% 2 3.85% 52
Macon 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Marion 6 33.33% 1 5.56% 11 61.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18
Monroe 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Montgomery 3 25.00% 2 16.67% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Osage 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pike 5 33.33% 1 6.67% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15
Ralls 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Randolph 6 37.50% 2 12.50% 8 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Shelby 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 32 33.68% 9 9.47% 54 56.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 95
Warren 8 40.00% 1 5.00% 11 55.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20
* Region Total * 150 28.96% 70 13.51% 272 52.51% 6 1.16% 20 3.86% 518
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Butler 12 25.53% 11 23.40% 15 31.92% 8 17.02% 1 2.13% 47
Cape Girardeau 4 22.22% 1 5.56% 11 61.11% 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 18
Carter 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Crawford 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 3 27.27% 3 27.27% 2 18.18% 11
Dent 4 25.00% 2 12.50% 8 50.00% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 16
Investigations Assessments
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days
Note: Investigations and Assessments reported
separately beginning July 2016. 10Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During June 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 3 15.00% 3 15.00% 10 50.00% 4 20.00% 0 0.00% 20
Howell 8 24.24% 2 6.06% 23 69.70% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33
Iron 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Jefferson 8 6.25% 18 14.06% 45 35.16% 41 32.03% 16 12.50% 128
Madison 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Maries 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Mississippi 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
New Madrid 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Oregon 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Pemiscot 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Phelps 3 15.00% 3 15.00% 9 45.00% 3 15.00% 2 10.00% 20
Pulaski 8 40.00% 1 5.00% 10 50.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 20
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ripley 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 6 46.15% 4 30.77% 1 7.69% 13
Scott 3 21.43% 1 7.14% 10 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14
Shannon 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
St Francois 16 35.56% 0 0.00% 29 64.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 45
Ste Genevieve 3 27.27% 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Stoddard 5 33.33% 1 6.67% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15
Texas 11 78.57% 1 7.14% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14
Washington 4 30.77% 3 23.08% 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13
Wayne 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7
* Region Total * 120 23.12% 59 11.37% 244 47.01% 74 14.26% 22 4.24% 519
Southwest Barry 12 34.29% 2 5.71% 20 57.14% 1 2.86% 0 0.00% 35
Barton 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Bates 6 37.50% 0 0.00% 10 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16
Benton 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 10 76.92% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13
Camden 4 23.53% 0 0.00% 11 64.71% 1 5.88% 1 5.88% 17
Cedar 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 9 69.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13
Christian 12 40.00% 1 3.33% 17 56.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 30
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 6 50.00% 1 8.33% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Douglas 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Greene 67 27.13% 20 8.10% 147 59.51% 13 5.26% 0 0.00% 247
Henry 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jasper 27 35.07% 2 2.60% 47 61.04% 1 1.30% 0 0.00% 77
Laclede 14 43.75% 2 6.25% 13 40.63% 0 0.00% 3 9.38% 32
Lawrence 12 34.29% 1 2.86% 22 62.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 35
McDonald 6 42.86% 0 0.00% 8 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14
Miller 5 45.46% 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Moniteau 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Morgan 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Newton 8 36.36% 0 0.00% 14 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22
Ozark 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Polk 5 26.32% 2 10.53% 12 63.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19
St Clair 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Stone 5 23.81% 0 0.00% 16 76.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21
Taney 10 26.32% 0 0.00% 28 73.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 38
Vernon 11 55.00% 0 0.00% 9 45.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20
Webster 9 25.71% 1 2.86% 25 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 35
Wright 12 63.16% 0 0.00% 7 36.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19
* Region Total * 251 32.60% 35 4.55% 462 60.00% 18 2.34% 4 0.52% 770
Kansas City Jackson 110 32.16% 28 8.19% 184 53.80% 18 5.26% 2 0.59% 342
* Region Total * 110 32.16% 28 8.19% 184 53.80% 18 5.26% 2 0.59% 342
St. Louis St Louis City 46 40.00% 11 9.57% 52 45.22% 6 5.22% 0 0.00% 115
St Louis County 91 12.40% 159 21.66% 141 19.21% 36 4.91% 307 41.83% 734
* Region Total * 137 16.14% 170 20.02% 193 22.73% 42 4.95% 307 36.16% 849
Other Out Home Inv 48 67.61% 10 14.09% 13 18.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 71
* Region Total * 48 67.61% 10 14.09% 13 18.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 71
State Total 918 26.90% 401 11.75% 1,568 45.94% 168 4.92% 358 10.49% 3,413
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days
Investigations Assessments
Note: Investigations and Assessments reported
separately beginning July 2016. 11Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During June 2020
CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Northwest Andrew 2 4 0 0 0 3 0 9
Atchison 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 4
Buchanan 35 46 4 9 9 28 0 131
Caldwell 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 6
Carroll 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 4
Cass 27 26 3 7 4 15 0 82
Chariton 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 4
Clay 42 59 2 20 12 36 0 171
Clinton 2 10 0 3 0 4 0 19
Cooper 2 6 2 1 1 1 0 13
Daviess 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 6
De Kalb 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 6
Gentry 0 5 1 0 1 3 0 10
Grundy 2 5 0 0 2 1 0 10
Harrison 6 3 0 1 0 3 0 13
Holt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Johnson 12 16 0 5 3 16 0 52
Lafayette 5 10 0 0 4 3 0 22
Linn 4 6 0 0 0 4 0 14
Livingston 8 5 2 1 0 7 0 23
Mercer 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3
Nodaway 2 9 0 2 0 2 0 15
Pettis 8 21 3 0 2 6 0 40
Platte 13 25 2 2 4 14 0 60
Putnam 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 4
Ray 4 9 2 3 1 6 0 25
Saline 7 14 2 0 3 11 0 37
Sullivan 3 4 0 0 0 2 0 9
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 195 294 23 55 48 178 0 793
Northeast Adair 6 9 3 0 0 7 0 25
Audrain 12 11 2 2 3 5 0 35
Boone 21 52 1 14 5 27 0 120
Callaway 7 19 1 3 2 13 0 45
Clark 5 3 0 0 3 2 0 13
Cole 19 20 0 5 2 7 0 53
Franklin 20 32 3 8 4 18 0 85
Gasconade 4 7 1 1 0 4 0 17
Howard 4 4 0 0 0 2 0 10
Knox 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lewis 4 7 0 1 0 4 0 16
Lincoln 16 27 3 2 6 17 0 71
Macon 1 6 0 0 1 1 0 9
Marion 5 12 1 2 0 9 0 29
Monroe 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 6
Montgomery 2 3 1 1 1 4 0 12
Osage 1 3 0 2 0 1 0 7
Pike 3 4 0 3 0 2 0 12
Ralls 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 5
Randolph 9 9 3 2 1 11 0 35
Schuyler 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
Scotland 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 4
Shelby 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 5
St Charles 45 56 2 11 9 41 0 164
Warren 4 11 1 2 4 12 0 34
* Region Total * 195 304 22 63 42 190 0 816
Southeast Bollinger 1 4 0 1 1 3 0 10
Butler 16 17 1 1 5 14 0 54
Cape Girardeau 16 27 3 3 4 11 0 64
Carter 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 6
Crawford 8 6 1 5 0 4 0 24
Dent 5 5 1 1 2 4 0 18
12Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During June 2020
CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Southeast Dunklin 4 10 2 1 4 8 0 29
Howell 10 21 2 2 1 22 0 58
Iron 2 4 1 1 1 4 0 13
Jefferson 23 52 2 20 9 43 0 149
Madison 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 7
Maries 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4
Mississippi 5 5 2 0 2 6 0 20
New Madrid 3 8 0 2 0 5 0 18
Oregon 2 4 0 1 0 2 0 9
Pemiscot 5 7 2 2 2 2 0 20
Perry 5 7 0 1 1 2 0 16
Phelps 7 22 2 5 2 11 0 49
Pulaski 16 13 2 3 6 18 0 58
Reynolds 1 6 0 0 1 5 0 13
Ripley 5 8 0 2 1 3 0 19
Scott 13 16 1 3 4 11 0 48
Shannon 4 4 0 1 0 4 0 13
St Francois 29 33 3 9 6 24 0 104
Ste Genevieve 4 12 0 0 0 4 0 20
Stoddard 8 11 0 2 0 8 0 29
Texas 8 5 1 2 1 8 0 25
Washington 3 7 3 6 1 10 0 30
Wayne 5 5 0 1 0 3 0 14
* Region Total * 214 326 30 77 54 240 0 941
Southwest Barry 16 21 0 4 5 6 0 52
Barton 4 3 0 2 2 2 0 13
Bates 2 6 0 1 1 4 0 14
Benton 3 3 1 0 0 3 0 10
Camden 9 17 0 1 2 7 0 36
Cedar 10 10 1 0 0 6 0 27
Christian 17 35 3 3 8 20 0 86
Dade 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3
Dallas 4 9 0 2 0 13 0 28
Douglas 1 2 1 1 0 5 0 10
Greene 86 185 9 42 22 102 0 446
Henry 11 12 3 5 0 9 0 40
Hickory 2 3 0 1 0 2 0 8
Jasper 31 73 6 9 9 39 0 167
Laclede 15 24 1 2 6 12 0 60
Lawrence 9 21 0 4 2 15 0 51
McDonald 4 11 1 2 3 12 0 33
Miller 8 9 4 4 0 11 0 36
Moniteau 6 2 0 2 0 2 0 12
Morgan 7 8 1 1 3 9 0 29
Newton 14 20 2 4 2 13 0 55
Ozark 2 4 0 0 0 4 0 10
Polk 12 17 0 5 6 15 0 55
St Clair 5 3 0 0 0 4 0 12
Stone 5 18 0 3 3 7 0 36
Taney 14 26 2 7 4 27 0 80
Vernon 8 12 0 3 1 6 0 30
Webster 7 16 2 1 1 12 0 39
Wright 6 10 1 2 3 10 0 32
* Region Total * 318 581 39 111 83 378 0 1,510
Kansas City Jackson 194 241 33 114 60 183 0 825
* Region Total * 194 241 33 114 60 183 0 825
St. Louis St Louis City 78 94 6 48 17 52 0 295
St Louis County 127 166 25 62 25 86 0 491
* Region Total * 205 260 31 110 42 138 0 786
Other Out Home Inv 88 2 0 0 5 27 0 122
Out Of State 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 15
Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 56
* Region Total * 95 10 0 0 5 27 56 193
State Total 1,416 2,016 178 530 334 1,334 56 5,864
13Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500Ju
n-1
6
Sep
-16
De
c-1
6
Mar
-17
Jun
-17
Sep
-17
De
c-1
7
Mar
-18
Jun
-18
Sep
-18
De
c-1
8
Mar
-19
Jun
-19
Sep
-19
De
c-1
9
Mar
-20
Jun
-20
Figure 2.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
June 2016 Through June 2020
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
De
c
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May Jun
Figure 3.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
July 2018 Through June 2020
Jul 2018 to Jun 2019 Jul 2019 to Jun 2020
14Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 4.
Percentage Change in CA/N Reports
Made Twelve Months ApartJune 2019 and June 2020
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 5.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During June 2020 by Conclusion
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other
15Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
Substantiated8%
Unsubstantiated P S I3%
Unsubstantiated24%
Family Assessment61%
Other4%
Figure 6.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During June 2020 by Conclusion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 7.
Time Between Report and Child Contact
For Investigations/Assessments Completed in June 2020
Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact
16Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8a.
CA/N Investigations Completed
During June 2020
Within 45 Days More Than 45 Days
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8b.
CA/N Assessments Completed
During June 2020
Within 45 Days Within 46-90 Days More Than 90 Days
17Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 18 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures
Table 1.
• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents
during any given month).
Table 2.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents
during any given month).
• Conclusions are as follows:
Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence, Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-
Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe,
Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,
Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation),
Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
Table 3.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,
Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-
cooperative/Child Safe, Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days,
Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,
Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed
Children’s Services Management Report 19 Research and Data Analysis
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,
Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School
Investigation)
Table 4.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include
information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-
Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.
Table 5.
• Based upon incidents concluded during the month.
Table 6.
• Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.
• Administrative referrals are not included.
Figure 2. and Figure 3.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month.
Figure 4.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same month of the previous year.
Figure 5. and Figure 6.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,
Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-
cooperative/Child Safe,
Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,
Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed
Children’s Services Management Report 20 Research and Data Analysis
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,
Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School
Investigation)
• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.
• Figures do not include information on expunged reports and reports where the only
alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already
Investigated.
Figure 7.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include
information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-
Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.
Figure 8a. and Figure 8b.
• Based upon investigations and assessments completed during the month.
Family-Centered Services
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of June 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 2 1 0 3
Atchison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Buchanan 11 3 1 11 14 1 41
Caldwell 1 0 0 0 2 0 3
Carroll 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Cass 0 6 8 0 2 3 19
Chariton 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Clay 1 10 4 3 8 0 26
Clinton 0 2 1 0 2 0 5
Cooper 0 1 0 1 2 0 4
Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Grundy 0 3 0 0 7 0 10
Harrison 1 3 0 0 3 0 7
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
Lafayette 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Linn 0 0 1 0 3 0 4
Livingston 0 1 0 1 3 0 5
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 1 0 0 2 1 4
Pettis 2 2 1 1 10 0 16
Platte 0 2 0 0 4 0 6
Putnam 0 1 1 0 2 0 4
Ray 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Saline 0 3 1 2 1 0 7
Sullivan 0 1 1 0 2 0 4
Worth 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
* Region Total * 16 44 20 21 78 5 184
Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 5 0 6
Audrain 1 1 1 2 6 1 12
Boone 9 6 0 3 26 7 51
Callaway 2 0 1 0 21 4 28
Clark 0 2 0 0 5 0 7
Cole 0 1 1 0 11 0 13
Franklin 0 8 0 5 19 0 32
Gasconade 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Howard 0 1 0 1 5 0 7
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Lincoln 0 2 4 1 20 0 27
Macon 0 2 1 0 1 0 4
Marion 1 1 3 0 8 0 13
Monroe 0 3 0 0 1 0 4
Montgomery 1 0 0 0 5 0 6
Osage 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Pike 2 2 1 2 4 0 11
Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Randolph 0 5 2 3 13 0 23
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
St Charles 0 1 2 4 22 0 29
Warren 0 5 0 1 12 0 18
* Region Total * 17 44 16 22 192 12 303
Southeast Bollinger 1 0 0 1 5 0 7
Butler 2 27 2 3 17 0 51
Cape Girardeau 2 5 1 4 44 2 58
Carter 2 0 0 1 2 0 5
Crawford 0 3 0 1 6 0 10
Dent 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
22Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of June 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 2 1 2 8 0 13
Howell 5 6 1 7 18 1 38
Iron 0 0 1 1 1 0 3
Jefferson 0 5 1 2 28 2 38
Madison 0 0 0 1 5 0 6
Maries 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Mississippi 0 0 0 2 3 0 5
New Madrid 0 1 0 2 13 0 16
Oregon 1 3 0 0 4 0 8
Pemiscot 0 3 0 2 12 0 17
Perry 0 2 0 0 8 0 10
Phelps 0 5 5 3 23 0 36
Pulaski 0 3 2 0 20 0 25
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 7 0 7
Ripley 0 1 1 1 3 1 7
Scott 2 1 0 7 23 0 33
Shannon 0 3 0 1 2 1 7
St Francois 0 9 0 1 20 0 30
Ste Genevieve 0 3 0 0 3 0 6
Stoddard 0 0 0 1 24 1 26
Texas 0 0 1 0 8 0 9
Washington 0 1 0 0 4 1 6
Wayne 0 2 0 2 11 0 15
* Region Total * 15 87 16 45 325 9 497
Southwest Barry 0 4 0 0 6 0 10
Barton 0 0 0 1 2 0 3
Bates 0 1 2 0 5 0 8
Benton 0 2 0 2 2 0 6
Camden 0 3 0 0 8 1 12
Cedar 0 2 1 0 2 0 5
Christian 0 6 1 3 15 0 25
Dade 0 2 0 0 1 0 3
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 1 0 5 0 6
Greene 1 2 0 0 75 1 79
Henry 0 3 0 1 12 0 16
Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Jasper 0 15 3 2 78 0 98
Laclede 1 5 3 2 16 0 27
Lawrence 0 2 0 0 4 0 6
McDonald 0 1 0 0 11 0 12
Miller 1 2 0 0 18 0 21
Moniteau 1 0 0 0 5 0 6
Morgan 0 2 0 0 7 0 9
Newton 0 3 0 0 8 1 12
Ozark 0 0 1 0 2 0 3
Polk 0 1 1 0 3 0 5
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 1 0 0 6 0 7
Taney 0 4 2 3 44 1 54
Vernon 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Webster 4 0 1 2 9 0 16
Wright 0 1 2 0 12 0 15
* Region Total * 8 63 18 16 358 4 467
Kansas City Jackson 0 5 13 16 132 42 208
* Region Total * 0 5 13 16 132 42 208
St. Louis St Louis City 1 2 1 2 52 1 59
St Louis County 8 8 18 1 23 5 63
* Region Total * 9 10 19 3 75 6 122
State Total 65 253 102 123 1,160 78 1,781
23Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 3 1 0 4
Atchison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Buchanan 12 4 1 11 17 1 46
Caldwell 1 0 0 0 3 0 4
Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Cass 0 8 9 0 4 3 24
Chariton 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
Clay 1 10 5 3 8 0 27
Clinton 0 2 1 0 3 0 6
Cooper 0 2 0 1 3 0 6
Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Grundy 0 3 0 0 7 0 10
Harrison 1 4 1 0 4 0 10
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
Lafayette 0 2 0 0 2 0 4
Linn 0 1 1 0 3 0 5
Livingston 0 3 0 1 3 0 7
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 1 0 1 6 1 9
Pettis 2 2 1 1 10 0 16
Platte 0 2 0 0 4 0 6
Putnam 1 2 1 0 2 0 6
Ray 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Saline 0 4 1 2 4 0 11
Sullivan 0 1 2 0 2 0 5
Worth 0 0 1 0 2 0 3
* Region Total * 18 55 24 23 99 5 224
Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 5 0 6
Audrain 1 2 1 2 7 1 14
Boone 9 7 0 3 32 8 59
Callaway 2 0 1 0 21 4 28
Clark 0 2 0 0 5 0 7
Cole 1 1 1 1 12 1 17
Franklin 0 9 0 5 21 0 35
Gasconade 0 2 0 0 3 0 5
Howard 0 1 0 1 5 0 7
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Lincoln 0 3 4 1 25 0 33
Macon 0 2 1 0 1 0 4
Marion 1 1 3 0 8 0 13
Monroe 0 3 0 0 1 0 4
Montgomery 1 0 0 0 5 0 6
Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Pike 2 2 1 3 4 0 12
Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Randolph 0 5 2 3 13 0 23
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
St Charles 0 3 2 4 27 0 36
Warren 0 6 0 1 13 0 20
* Region Total * 18 52 16 24 215 14 339
Southeast Bollinger 1 0 1 1 7 0 10
Butler 2 28 2 3 19 0 54
Cape Girardeau 2 5 1 4 48 2 62
Carter 2 0 0 1 4 0 7
Crawford 0 3 1 1 6 0 11
Dent 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
24Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 2 1 3 14 0 20
Howell 5 7 1 8 25 1 47
Iron 0 0 1 1 1 0 3
Jefferson 0 5 1 3 40 2 51
Madison 0 1 0 1 7 0 9
Maries 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Mississippi 0 0 0 2 5 0 7
New Madrid 0 1 0 2 14 0 17
Oregon 1 3 0 0 4 0 8
Pemiscot 0 3 0 2 14 0 19
Perry 0 2 0 0 10 0 12
Phelps 0 6 6 3 24 0 39
Pulaski 0 4 2 0 23 0 29
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 7 0 7
Ripley 0 2 1 1 3 1 8
Scott 2 1 0 7 25 0 35
Shannon 0 4 0 1 4 1 10
St Francois 0 11 0 1 24 0 36
Ste Genevieve 0 3 0 0 4 0 7
Stoddard 0 0 0 1 27 1 29
Texas 0 0 1 0 14 0 15
Washington 0 1 0 0 9 1 11
Wayne 0 2 0 2 12 0 16
* Region Total * 15 96 19 48 398 9 585
Southwest Barry 0 4 0 0 7 0 11
Barton 0 0 0 1 2 0 3
Bates 0 1 2 0 5 0 8
Benton 0 2 0 2 2 0 6
Camden 0 4 0 0 10 1 15
Cedar 0 3 1 0 3 0 7
Christian 0 7 1 3 16 0 27
Dade 0 2 0 0 1 0 3
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 1 0 5 0 6
Greene 2 4 0 0 80 1 87
Henry 0 3 0 1 13 0 17
Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Jasper 0 18 3 3 85 0 109
Laclede 1 6 3 2 16 0 28
Lawrence 0 2 0 0 6 0 8
McDonald 0 1 0 0 12 0 13
Miller 1 2 0 0 19 0 22
Moniteau 1 0 0 0 5 0 6
Morgan 0 2 0 0 9 0 11
Newton 0 3 0 0 9 1 13
Ozark 0 0 1 0 3 0 4
Polk 0 1 1 0 4 0 6
St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Stone 0 1 0 0 6 0 7
Taney 0 5 2 3 44 1 55
Vernon 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Webster 4 0 1 2 9 0 16
Wright 0 2 2 0 14 0 18
* Region Total * 9 74 18 17 388 4 510
Kansas City Jackson 0 5 14 22 156 48 245
* Region Total * 0 5 14 22 156 48 245
St. Louis St Louis City 1 2 2 2 65 1 73
St Louis County 8 8 21 2 27 5 71
* Region Total * 9 10 23 4 92 6 144
State Total 69 292 114 138 1,348 86 2,047
25Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During June 2020
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Northwest Andrew 8 6 0 14 0
Atchison 6 3 0 9 3
Buchanan 100 97 0 197 9
Caldwell 11 13 0 24 0
Carroll 5 3 0 8 0
Cass 45 42 0 87 23
Chariton 9 11 1 21 2
Clay 71 59 0 130 6
Clinton 10 11 0 21 3
Cooper 14 10 0 24 1
Daviess 1 3 0 4 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 2 6 0 8 0
Grundy 23 23 0 46 9
Harrison 14 31 0 45 9
Holt 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 10 13 0 23 1
Lafayette 6 12 0 18 1
Linn 8 14 0 22 2
Livingston 19 13 0 32 2
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 14 17 0 31 6
Pettis 30 37 0 67 8
Platte 17 16 0 33 5
Putnam 13 13 0 26 6
Ray 2 1 0 3 0
Saline 23 20 0 43 3
Sullivan 9 10 0 19 1
Worth 6 4 0 10 2
* Region Total * 476 488 1 965 102
Northeast Adair 8 14 0 22 2
Audrain 34 32 0 66 8
Boone 99 110 1 210 52
Callaway 62 59 0 121 18
Clark 19 21 0 40 3
Cole 42 43 0 85 22
Franklin 102 81 0 183 23
Gasconade 11 15 0 26 3
Howard 13 11 0 24 4
Knox 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 5 6 0 11 0
Lincoln 51 80 0 131 21
Macon 6 11 0 17 8
Marion 22 35 1 58 6
Monroe 8 10 0 18 1
Montgomery 14 13 0 27 1
Osage 6 5 0 11 2
Pike 22 26 0 48 11
Ralls 1 2 0 3 0
Randolph 41 49 0 90 20
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 7 8 0 15 4
Shelby 1 2 0 3 2
St Charles 77 55 0 132 11
Warren 44 42 0 86 4
* Region Total * 695 730 2 1,427 226
Southeast Bollinger 17 26 0 43 8
Butler 92 112 0 204 22
Cape Girardeau 111 122 0 233 28
Carter 15 14 0 29 0
Crawford 19 28 0 47 10
Dent 10 17 0 27 3
26Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During June 2020
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Southeast Dunklin 33 47 0 80 12
Howell 99 98 0 197 6
Iron 7 7 0 14 2
Jefferson 118 110 1 229 34
Madison 17 21 0 38 3
Maries 4 3 0 7 3
Mississippi 15 25 0 40 10
New Madrid 25 29 0 54 2
Oregon 18 23 0 41 5
Pemiscot 30 44 0 74 7
Perry 22 32 0 54 8
Phelps 75 78 0 153 16
Pulaski 57 73 0 130 11
Reynolds 19 11 0 30 6
Ripley 15 19 0 34 5
Scott 61 75 0 136 11
Shannon 22 18 0 40 3
St Francois 68 81 0 149 10
Ste Genevieve 12 15 0 27 3
Stoddard 57 59 0 116 17
Texas 34 30 0 64 2
Washington 23 24 1 48 4
Wayne 43 35 0 78 11
* Region Total * 1,138 1,276 2 2,416 262
Southwest Barry 18 24 0 42 9
Barton 6 7 0 13 3
Bates 15 19 0 34 5
Benton 10 13 0 23 0
Camden 24 36 0 60 10
Cedar 11 16 0 27 7
Christian 55 62 0 117 17
Dade 5 5 0 10 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 13 15 0 28 5
Greene 186 180 3 369 41
Henry 28 36 3 67 6
Hickory 1 1 0 2 0
Jasper 203 232 0 435 54
Laclede 63 67 0 130 12
Lawrence 16 21 0 37 4
McDonald 30 35 0 65 4
Miller 56 48 0 104 3
Moniteau 14 16 0 30 0
Morgan 23 25 0 48 0
Newton 26 34 0 60 12
Ozark 7 9 0 16 4
Polk 11 14 0 25 4
St Clair 3 3 0 6 2
Stone 11 13 0 24 0
Taney 102 107 0 209 20
Vernon 3 3 0 6 0
Webster 30 29 0 59 3
Wright 36 41 0 77 13
* Region Total * 1,006 1,111 6 2,123 238
Kansas City Jackson 471 510 0 981 201
* Region Total * 471 510 0 981 201
St. Louis St Louis City 145 189 1 335 29
St Louis County 134 155 0 289 46
* Region Total * 279 344 1 624 75
State Total 4,065 4,459 12 8,536 1,104
27Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During June 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 2 0 3 5 0 10
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
Clinton 0 2 1 0 2 0 5
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Grundy 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Harrison 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lafayette 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Linn 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Livingston 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
Pettis 1 0 0 0 6 0 7
Platte 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Putnam 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
* Region Total * 1 16 2 4 28 1 52
Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Audrain 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Boone 3 2 0 1 3 1 10
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 2 0 0 3 0 5
Cole 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Franklin 0 1 0 1 2 0 4
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Lincoln 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Monroe 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Montgomery 1 0 0 0 3 0 4
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Randolph 0 0 1 1 0 0 2
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
St Charles 0 1 0 1 4 0 6
Warren 0 2 0 1 1 0 4
* Region Total * 6 10 1 5 29 1 52
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 5 0 1 5 0 11
Cape Girardeau 0 2 1 2 8 0 13
Carter 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Crawford 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During June 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Howell 0 3 0 1 0 1 5
Iron 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Jefferson 0 1 0 0 6 0 7
Madison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Maries 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Oregon 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Pemiscot 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Perry 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Phelps 0 0 1 1 3 0 5
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Scott 1 0 0 0 3 0 4
Shannon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
St Francois 0 2 0 1 4 0 7
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
Texas 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Washington 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Wayne 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 1 17 3 10 51 1 83
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Camden 0 0 0 0 2 1 3
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 1 1 1 0 3
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Greene 0 0 0 0 8 0 8
Henry 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 0 1 1 0 10 0 12
Laclede 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
Lawrence 0 2 0 0 1 0 3
McDonald 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Miller 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 0 0 0 4 1 5
Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Polk 0 1 1 0 1 0 3
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Taney 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 1 0 2 0 3
Wright 0 1 1 0 3 0 5
* Region Total * 0 8 6 2 52 2 70
Kansas City Jackson 0 2 0 1 17 1 21
* Region Total * 0 2 0 1 17 1 21
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 0 10 0 10
St Louis County 0 1 1 0 3 0 5
* Region Total * 0 1 1 0 13 0 15
State Total 8 54 13 22 190 6 293
29Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During June 2020
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Northwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Caldwell 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Carroll 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cass 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5
Chariton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clay 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Cooper 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Livingston 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5
Pettis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
* Region Total * 28 65.12% 15 34.88% 43
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Boone 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8
Callaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4
Franklin 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Gasconade 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pike 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7
Warren 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
* Region Total * 24 60.00% 16 40.00% 40
Southeast Bollinger 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Butler 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Cape Girardeau 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Carter 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Crawford 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Dent 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Goal Achieved Other
30Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During June 2020
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Southeast Dunklin 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7
Howell 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 13
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 13
Madison 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
New Madrid 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Perry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Phelps 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Pulaski 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scott 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Shannon 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
St Francois 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 7
Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stoddard 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Texas 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6
Washington 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5
Wayne 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 55 59.14% 38 40.86% 93
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Cedar 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Christian 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8
Henry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 4 36.36% 7 63.64% 11
Laclede 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lawrence 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
McDonald 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Polk 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
* Region Total * 20 46.51% 23 53.49% 43
Kansas City Jackson 34 87.18% 5 12.82% 39
* Region Total * 34 87.18% 5 12.82% 39
St. Louis St Louis City 4 23.53% 13 76.47% 17
St Louis County 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 8
* Region Total * 6 24.00% 19 76.00% 25
State Total 167 59.01% 116 40.99% 283
Goal Achieved Other
31Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Buchanan 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 2 14.29% 6 42.86% 3 21.43% 3 21.43% 14
Chariton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clay 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Clinton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cooper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Harrison 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Livingston 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Pettis 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Platte 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Putnam 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
* Region Total * 36 55.39% 20 30.77% 4 6.15% 5 7.69% 65
Northeast Adair 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Audrain 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5
Boone 13 43.33% 5 16.67% 7 23.33% 5 16.67% 30
Callaway 1 9.09% 5 45.46% 1 9.09% 4 36.36% 11
Clark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cole 3 33.33% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Franklin 3 37.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 8
Gasconade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 11
Macon 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Marion 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 4
Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pike 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 6
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 9
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Shelby 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Charles 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 7
Warren 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
* Region Total * 44 37.29% 32 27.12% 12 10.17% 30 25.42% 118
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Butler 5 38.46% 6 46.15% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13
Cape Girardeau 11 57.90% 4 21.05% 3 15.79% 1 5.26% 19
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Crawford 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Dent 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
32Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Howell 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4
Iron 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jefferson 5 23.81% 6 28.57% 1 4.76% 9 42.86% 21
Madison 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Maries 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
New Madrid 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pemiscot 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Perry 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Phelps 6 60.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 10
Pulaski 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 7
Reynolds 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Ripley 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Scott 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6
Shannon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Francois 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ste Genevieve 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Stoddard 6 54.55% 5 45.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Texas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Washington 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Wayne 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
* Region Total * 71 49.65% 34 23.78% 20 13.99% 18 12.59% 143
Southwest Barry 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
Barton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Bates 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Cedar 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Christian 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 7
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Greene 7 29.17% 3 12.50% 11 45.83% 3 12.50% 24
Henry 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 9 28.13% 13 40.63% 4 12.50% 6 18.75% 32
Laclede 2 28.57% 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Lawrence 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
McDonald 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Miller 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Ozark 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Polk 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 4 30.77% 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 5 38.46% 13
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wright 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 6
* Region Total * 46 37.10% 35 28.23% 20 16.13% 23 18.55% 124
Kansas City Jackson 30 23.81% 35 27.78% 18 14.29% 43 34.13% 126
* Region Total * 30 23.81% 35 27.78% 18 14.29% 43 34.13% 126
St. Louis St Louis City 5 33.33% 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 4 26.67% 15
St Louis County 9 30.00% 11 36.67% 4 13.33% 6 20.00% 30
* Region Total * 14 31.11% 14 31.11% 7 15.56% 10 22.22% 45
State Total 241 38.81% 170 27.38% 81 13.04% 129 20.77% 621
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
33Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 34 79.07% 7 16.28% 0 0.00% 2 4.65% 43
Caldwell 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Carroll 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cass 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Chariton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clay 14 58.33% 8 33.33% 1 4.17% 1 4.17% 24
Clinton 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cooper 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 5
Daviess 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Grundy 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Harrison 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Lafayette 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Linn 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Livingston 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Pettis 7 58.33% 2 16.67% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12
Platte 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Putnam 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ray 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Saline 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Sullivan 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 110 67.90% 34 20.99% 13 8.03% 5 3.09% 162
Northeast Adair 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Audrain 4 44.44% 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9
Boone 22 75.86% 4 13.79% 1 3.45% 2 6.90% 29
Callaway 8 47.06% 5 29.41% 2 11.77% 2 11.77% 17
Clark 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Cole 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Franklin 10 37.04% 14 51.85% 1 3.70% 2 7.41% 27
Gasconade 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Howard 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Lincoln 12 54.55% 6 27.27% 2 9.09% 2 9.09% 22
Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Marion 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Monroe 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Montgomery 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Osage 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pike 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 6
Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Randolph 5 33.33% 6 40.00% 3 20.00% 1 6.67% 15
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 24 82.76% 4 13.79% 1 3.45% 0 0.00% 29
Warren 14 77.78% 4 22.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18
* Region Total * 140 62.50% 58 25.89% 16 7.14% 10 4.46% 224
Southeast Bollinger 2 25.00% 3 37.50% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 8
Butler 19 46.34% 10 24.39% 5 12.20% 7 17.07% 41
Cape Girardeau 22 51.16% 13 30.23% 4 9.30% 4 9.30% 43
Carter 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 7
Crawford 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Dent 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
34Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 8 61.54% 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13
Howell 17 39.54% 14 32.56% 6 13.95% 6 13.95% 43
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jefferson 16 53.33% 10 33.33% 3 10.00% 1 3.33% 30
Madison 5 71.43% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
New Madrid 6 37.50% 4 25.00% 4 25.00% 2 12.50% 16
Oregon 4 57.14% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 7
Pemiscot 8 47.06% 5 29.41% 2 11.77% 2 11.77% 17
Perry 5 50.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 10
Phelps 13 44.83% 10 34.48% 2 6.90% 4 13.79% 29
Pulaski 12 54.55% 6 27.27% 2 9.09% 2 9.09% 22
Reynolds 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Ripley 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 6
Scott 14 48.28% 11 37.93% 1 3.45% 3 10.35% 29
Shannon 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 9
St Francois 15 48.39% 12 38.71% 2 6.45% 2 6.45% 31
Ste Genevieve 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Stoddard 14 77.78% 2 11.11% 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 18
Texas 6 42.86% 5 35.71% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 14
Washington 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Wayne 1 9.09% 5 45.46% 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 11
* Region Total * 211 47.74% 136 30.77% 52 11.77% 43 9.73% 442
Southwest Barry 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8
Barton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Bates 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Benton 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Camden 6 60.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
Cedar 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Christian 12 60.00% 3 15.00% 5 25.00% 0 0.00% 20
Dade 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
Greene 31 49.21% 19 30.16% 9 14.29% 4 6.35% 63
Henry 8 61.54% 2 15.39% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 13
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Jasper 33 42.86% 33 42.86% 9 11.69% 2 2.60% 77
Laclede 9 42.86% 8 38.10% 3 14.29% 1 4.76% 21
Lawrence 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
McDonald 5 45.46% 5 45.46% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11
Miller 14 73.68% 3 15.79% 1 5.26% 1 5.26% 19
Moniteau 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6
Morgan 6 54.55% 3 27.27% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 11
Newton 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Ozark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Polk 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 7
Taney 18 42.86% 8 19.05% 8 19.05% 8 19.05% 42
Vernon 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Webster 8 53.33% 4 26.67% 2 13.33% 1 6.67% 15
Wright 7 58.33% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
* Region Total * 203 52.59% 112 29.02% 46 11.92% 25 6.48% 386
Kansas City Jackson 81 66.94% 28 23.14% 4 3.31% 8 6.61% 121
* Region Total * 81 66.94% 28 23.14% 4 3.31% 8 6.61% 121
St. Louis St Louis City 32 55.17% 23 39.66% 3 5.17% 0 0.00% 58
St Louis County 20 48.78% 11 26.83% 4 9.76% 6 14.63% 41
* Region Total * 52 52.53% 34 34.34% 7 7.07% 6 6.06% 99
State Total 797 55.58% 402 28.03% 138 9.62% 97 6.76% 1,434
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
35Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Note: FCS cases with associated AC functions opened were automatically closed March 1, 2017 due to a policy change.
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Jun-1
6
Aug-1
6
Oct
-16
Dec-
16
Feb-1
7
Apr-
17
Jun-1
7
Aug-1
7
Oct
-17
Dec-
17
Feb-1
8
Apr-
18
Jun-1
8
Aug-1
8
Oct
-18
Dec-
18
Feb-1
9
Apr-
19
Jun-1
9
Aug-1
9
Oct
-19
Dec-
19
Feb-2
0
Apr-
20
Jun-2
0
Figure 9.
FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month
June 2016 Through June 2020
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 10.
Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active
as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months ApartJune 2019 and June 2020
36Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 11.
FCS Cases Opened During June 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered
Newborn Crisis Assessment Family Assessment AC Closed/FCS Reopen
Court Ordered4%
Preponderance of Evidence
3%
Newborn Crisis Assessment
8%
Family Assessment65%
AC Closed/FCS Reopen2%
Preventive Services18%
Figure 12.
FCS Cases Opened During June 2020
by Reason for Opening
37Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 13.
FCS Cases Closed During June 2020
by Reason for Closing
Goal Achieved Other Reason
0 to 3 Months39%
4 to 7 Months27%
8 to 11 Months13%
12+ Months21%
Figure 14.
FCS Cases Active During June 2020
With Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open
38Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0 to 3 Months55%
4 to 7 Months28%
8 to 11 Months10%
12+ Months7%
Figure 15.
FCS Cases Active During June 2020
With No Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open
39Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 40 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures
Table 9.
Counts of persons are unduplicated.
Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.
Table 11.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;
all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;
services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources;
no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;
client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;
referred to other appropriate resource;
other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;
family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Table 12.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Figure 9.
On March 1, 2017, memorandum CD17-16 was issued and informed staff they will no longer
open FCS functions on families when children are placed in alternative care. When the change
was implemented on March 1, 2017, all FCS cases with associated AC functions opened wereautomatically closed. The closure of the FCS cases associated with AC functions explains the
large decline in the number of FCS cases.
Children’s Services Management Report 41 Research and Data Analysis
Figure 13.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;
all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;
services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and
family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;
client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;
referred to other appropriate resource;
other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;
family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made;
resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Figure 14.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During June 2020
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.24 17.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.82 8.25
Cass 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.11 11.67
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clay 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.02 0.00
Clinton 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.39 1.00
Cooper 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 9.00
Daviess 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.44 2.00
De Kalb 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.43 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Harrison 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.90 16.00
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.33 2.00
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 1 4 0 0 5 1.17 9.40
Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Putnam 0 0 2 0 0 2 1.72 5.00
Ray 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.17 0.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.19 15.00
Sullivan 0 1 3 0 0 4 2.46 11.50
Worth 0 0 1 0 0 1 2.25 11.00
* Region Total * 0 5 27 1 1 34 0.16 7.85
Northeast Adair 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.40 14.00
Audrain 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.16 11.00
Boone 0 0 8 1 0 9 0.26 4.44
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cole 0 4 2 1 0 7 0.39 6.14
Franklin 0 3 2 0 1 6 0.24 6.00
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howard 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.46 13.00
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lincoln 0 3 3 0 0 6 0.41 3.33
Macon 0 2 0 1 0 3 0.79 6.33
Marion 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.29 11.50
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Osage 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.29 0.00
Pike 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.24 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 4 0 0 1 5 0.85 1.80
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 2 3 0 0 5 0.05 5.60
Warren 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.49 5.75
* Region Total * 0 18 28 3 4 53 0.20 5.53
Southeast Bollinger 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.69 7.50
Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.12 15.50
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
44Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During June 2020
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 1 7 0 0 8 1.33 3.00
Dent 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.82 12.00
Dunklin 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.12 0.00
Howell 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.50 7.00
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 2 7 0 0 9 0.16 4.33
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mississippi 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.31 16.00
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pemiscot 0 1 3 2 1 7 1.39 3.14
Perry 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.42 5.00
Phelps 0 3 2 0 1 6 0.61 1.83
Pulaski 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.24 6.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 0 6 0 0 6 1.81 3.33
Scott 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.10 0.00
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 3 1 1 0 5 0.35 5.40
Ste Genevieve 0 2 0 1 0 3 0.71 13.67
Stoddard 0 2 7 0 1 10 1.46 5.70
Texas 0 0 0 4 0 4 0.70 10.00
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 18 45 11 4 78 0.35 5.67
Southwest Barry 0 3 1 0 2 6 0.69 3.17
Barton 0 4 0 0 0 4 1.24 6.25
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Camden 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.48 10.50
Cedar 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.60 7.00
Christian 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.24 6.60
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.24 3.00
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Greene 0 2 5 7 3 17 0.29 5.18
Henry 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.61 2.00
Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.60 4.00
Jasper 0 2 3 0 0 5 0.17 4.20
Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lawrence 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 16.00
McDonald 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.62 4.00
Miller 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.16 1.00
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Morgan 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.22 6.00
Newton 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.27 7.00
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Polk 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.13 0.00
St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.51 10.00
Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Taney 0 3 8 1 0 12 1.05 5.00
Vernon 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.19 16.00
Webster 0 4 5 0 1 10 1.00 7.40
Wright 0 4 0 1 0 5 1.03 5.60
* Region Total * 0 27 44 10 8 89 0.34 5.73
Kansas City Jackson 0 10 32 8 6 56 0.34 5.55
* Region Total * 0 10 32 8 6 56 0.34 5.55
St. Louis St Louis City 0 7 3 0 1 11 0.16 6.73
St Louis County 0 8 16 1 3 28 0.12 7.00
* Region Total * 0 15 19 1 4 39 0.13 6.92
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
State Total 0 93 195 34 27 349 0.24 6.00
45Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During June 2020
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.10 13.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 3 0 0 1 4 0.15 7.75
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.17 16.50
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.47 8.50
Pettis 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.09 14.00
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ray 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.17 2.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 6 4 0 2 12 0.06 10.25
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Boone 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.09 6.33
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Franklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Marion 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.15 14.00
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 2 0 2 0 0 4 0.68 10.00
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.02 9.00
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 2 1 7 0 0 10 0.04 9.10
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Butler 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 7.00
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carter 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.66 16.00
46Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During June 2020
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howell 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 4.00
Iron 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.83 2.50
Jefferson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Maries 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.46 10.00
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pemiscot 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.40 7.00
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Phelps 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 15.00
Pulaski 0 1 0 2 0 3 0.24 13.33
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scott 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 16.00
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 4 4 5 0 13 0.06 9.77
Southwest Barry 0 2 0 2 0 4 0.46 9.50
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Christian 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.09 5.00
Dade 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.56 14.00
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Greene 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.05 5.33
Henry 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.20 16.00
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.07 9.50
Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Newton 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.14 6.50
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Clair 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.51 15.00
Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Taney 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Webster 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.10 4.00
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 11 3 3 0 17 0.07 8.53
Kansas City Jackson 0 1 12 2 2 17 0.10 11.47
* Region Total * 0 1 12 2 2 17 0.10 11.47
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Louis County 0 0 6 1 0 7 0.03 14.29
* Region Total * 0 0 6 1 0 7 0.02 14.29
State Total 2 23 36 11 4 76 0.05 10.28
47Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
June 2018 Through May 2020
Total
Month/Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries
Jun-2018 480 74 554
Jul-2018 404 73 477
Aug-2018 557 118 675
Sep-2018 487 83 570
Oct-2018 489 78 567
Nov-2018 428 78 506
Dec-2018 451 82 533
Jan-2019 498 98 596
Feb-2019 396 92 488
Mar-2019 456 86 542
Apr-2019 625 85 710
May-2019 492 100 592
Jun-2019 408 88 496
Jul-2019 474 91 565
Aug-2019 583 133 716
Sep-2019 554 111 665
Oct-2019 583 110 693
Nov-2019 455 66 521
Dec-2019 490 78 568
Jan-2020 563 108 671
Feb-2020 515 103 618
Mar-2020 474 96 570
Apr-2020 326 49 375
May-2020 424 58 482
Total 11,612 2,138 13,750
48Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 17.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During June 2020
by Length of Stay and Region
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest 11 27.50% 9 22.50% 20 50.00% 40 29.85 10.00
Northeast 23 34.85% 24 36.36% 19 28.79% 66 25.83 9.55
Southeast 33 22.60% 57 39.04% 56 38.36% 146 24.57 9.38
Southwest 21 19.44% 52 48.15% 35 32.41% 108 25.12 9.38
Kansas City 14 40.00% 8 22.86% 13 37.14% 35 22.60 7.63
St. Louis 14 31.82% 7 15.91% 23 52.27% 44 29.64 9.32
Other 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00
State Total 116 26.42% 157 35.76% 166 37.81% 439 25.73 9.32
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
49Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 3.00 0.00
Atchison 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 7 21.57 5.71
Buchanan 37 40.66% 31 34.07% 23 25.28% 91 17.96 8.30
Caldwell 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 9 12.89 9.33
Carroll 8 57.14% 3 21.43% 3 21.43% 14 13.14 10.79
Cass 71 38.17% 59 31.72% 56 30.11% 186 21.82 10.28
Chariton 4 28.57% 0 0.00% 10 71.43% 14 51.14 13.79
Clay 55 36.18% 44 28.95% 53 34.87% 152 23.25 7.99
Clinton 12 26.09% 13 28.26% 21 45.65% 46 31.78 8.30
Cooper 8 47.06% 2 11.77% 7 41.18% 17 20.00 11.47
Daviess 7 46.67% 4 26.67% 4 26.67% 15 29.73 9.13
De Kalb 6 25.00% 17 70.83% 1 4.17% 24 19.25 6.29
Gentry 9 56.25% 1 6.25% 6 37.50% 16 18.56 6.56
Grundy 19 57.58% 11 33.33% 3 9.09% 33 14.24 6.09
Harrison 17 54.84% 6 19.36% 8 25.81% 31 16.81 9.42
Holt 7 33.33% 5 23.81% 9 42.86% 21 22.90 9.57
Johnson 52 42.62% 44 36.07% 26 21.31% 122 19.24 7.60
Lafayette 19 40.43% 13 27.66% 15 31.92% 47 20.70 8.64
Linn 20 25.32% 30 37.98% 29 36.71% 79 27.52 10.58
Livingston 23 39.66% 23 39.66% 12 20.69% 58 19.74 8.43
Mercer 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 9.00 2.33
Nodaway 32 53.33% 8 13.33% 20 33.33% 60 18.15 8.33
Pettis 25 32.90% 27 35.53% 24 31.58% 76 25.92 9.61
Platte 23 63.89% 7 19.44% 6 16.67% 36 16.06 8.89
Putnam 6 28.57% 8 38.10% 7 33.33% 21 25.38 10.10
Ray 10 66.67% 3 20.00% 2 13.33% 15 11.47 6.93
Saline 19 38.00% 19 38.00% 12 24.00% 50 22.76 7.34
Sullivan 12 37.50% 10 31.25% 10 31.25% 32 19.00 10.59
Worth 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 3.29 3.57
* Region Total * 520 40.53% 391 30.48% 372 29.00% 1,283 21.55 8.79
Northeast Adair 42 44.68% 32 34.04% 20 21.28% 94 17.74 8.70
Audrain 13 29.55% 7 15.91% 24 54.55% 44 31.45 9.93
Boone 121 39.29% 79 25.65% 108 35.07% 308 23.79 9.94
Callaway 58 34.12% 46 27.06% 66 38.82% 170 22.06 9.00
Clark 12 37.50% 10 31.25% 10 31.25% 32 19.66 7.81
Cole 76 48.41% 43 27.39% 38 24.20% 157 17.91 7.90
Franklin 122 39.10% 61 19.55% 129 41.35% 312 25.86 8.44
Gasconade 12 40.00% 6 20.00% 12 40.00% 30 20.27 9.07
Howard 23 51.11% 13 28.89% 9 20.00% 45 17.91 10.82
Knox 4 30.77% 8 61.54% 1 7.69% 13 15.46 9.15
Lewis 10 66.67% 2 13.33% 3 20.00% 15 29.33 8.20
Lincoln 59 40.14% 37 25.17% 51 34.69% 147 19.10 8.42
Macon 47 51.65% 24 26.37% 20 21.98% 91 15.03 8.87
Marion 47 24.61% 56 29.32% 88 46.07% 191 26.43 9.31
Monroe 9 28.13% 13 40.63% 10 31.25% 32 18.81 8.38
Montgomery 15 33.33% 10 22.22% 20 44.44% 45 27.44 8.24
Osage 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 7 17.00 4.86
Pike 26 61.91% 6 14.29% 10 23.81% 42 18.19 9.24
Ralls 2 10.53% 9 47.37% 8 42.11% 19 35.11 10.95
Randolph 63 46.67% 42 31.11% 30 22.22% 135 15.45 9.21
Schuyler 5 38.46% 4 30.77% 4 30.77% 13 22.00 9.46
Scotland 3 23.08% 8 61.54% 2 15.39% 13 18.54 10.77
Shelby 7 41.18% 5 29.41% 5 29.41% 17 24.00 11.24
St Charles 97 38.49% 80 31.75% 75 29.76% 252 23.85 9.26
Warren 44 50.00% 17 19.32% 27 30.68% 88 18.49 9.10
* Region Total * 919 39.75% 621 26.86% 772 33.39% 2,312 22.04 9.04
Southeast Bollinger 41 55.41% 18 24.32% 15 20.27% 74 14.95 7.47
Butler 74 35.07% 75 35.55% 62 29.38% 211 23.06 8.39
Cape Girardeau 91 40.81% 82 36.77% 50 22.42% 223 18.22 7.99
Carter 8 66.67% 3 25.00% 1 8.33% 12 14.67 6.08
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
50Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Southeast Crawford 84 66.14% 22 17.32% 21 16.54% 127 15.17 8.56
Dent 28 45.16% 11 17.74% 23 37.10% 62 21.71 8.44
Dunklin 67 58.26% 32 27.83% 16 13.91% 115 16.31 7.61
Howell 57 44.19% 42 32.56% 30 23.26% 129 20.39 9.05
Iron 16 51.61% 11 35.48% 4 12.90% 31 15.13 7.13
Jefferson 194 31.14% 250 40.13% 179 28.73% 623 21.09 7.67
Madison 7 17.07% 19 46.34% 15 36.59% 41 27.37 8.71
Maries 9 47.37% 9 47.37% 1 5.26% 19 11.32 10.68
Mississippi 26 50.98% 19 37.26% 6 11.77% 51 16.16 8.04
New Madrid 38 29.46% 41 31.78% 50 38.76% 129 23.36 9.05
Oregon 23 44.23% 15 28.85% 14 26.92% 52 21.92 9.52
Pemiscot 79 61.72% 18 14.06% 31 24.22% 128 21.25 9.50
Perry 18 33.96% 25 47.17% 10 18.87% 53 16.34 7.34
Phelps 105 46.67% 56 24.89% 64 28.44% 225 18.64 8.80
Pulaski 89 54.27% 35 21.34% 40 24.39% 164 18.10 8.37
Reynolds 13 44.83% 11 37.93% 5 17.24% 29 19.00 7.59
Ripley 19 39.58% 12 25.00% 17 35.42% 48 29.27 9.38
Scott 58 43.28% 45 33.58% 31 23.13% 134 17.20 7.35
Shannon 2 14.29% 3 21.43% 9 64.29% 14 22.00 11.29
St Francois 91 35.00% 93 35.77% 76 29.23% 260 21.60 8.25
Ste Genevieve 12 36.36% 9 27.27% 12 36.36% 33 22.09 9.15
Stoddard 100 71.43% 23 16.43% 17 12.14% 140 12.68 8.64
Texas 34 36.17% 29 30.85% 31 32.98% 94 18.43 8.04
Washington 37 23.42% 53 33.54% 68 43.04% 158 26.25 8.98
Wayne 27 37.50% 27 37.50% 18 25.00% 72 22.53 9.88
* Region Total * 1,447 41.93% 1,088 31.53% 916 26.54% 3,451 19.95 8.34
Southwest Barry 66 36.67% 56 31.11% 58 32.22% 180 20.73 8.01
Barton 12 38.71% 6 19.36% 13 41.94% 31 27.26 10.48
Bates 11 44.00% 3 12.00% 11 44.00% 25 25.92 9.48
Benton 9 37.50% 8 33.33% 7 29.17% 24 22.63 10.58
Camden 44 47.31% 28 30.11% 21 22.58% 93 19.37 9.32
Cedar 12 38.71% 11 35.48% 8 25.81% 31 20.61 11.10
Christian 77 48.43% 43 27.04% 39 24.53% 159 17.12 8.26
Dade 5 50.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 10 9.50 9.60
Dallas 28 60.87% 7 15.22% 11 23.91% 46 18.41 7.96
Douglas 16 50.00% 13 40.63% 3 9.38% 32 13.22 10.00
Greene 386 54.83% 175 24.86% 143 20.31% 704 19.00 7.90
Henry 44 61.11% 9 12.50% 19 26.39% 72 18.10 8.42
Hickory 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 7 87.50% 8 49.75 8.00
Jasper 207 42.51% 137 28.13% 143 29.36% 487 20.66 9.02
Laclede 56 35.90% 38 24.36% 62 39.74% 156 23.42 7.67
Lawrence 73 44.51% 42 25.61% 49 29.88% 164 21.93 8.80
McDonald 47 68.12% 10 14.49% 12 17.39% 69 13.32 9.28
Miller 25 38.46% 10 15.39% 30 46.15% 65 25.18 7.95
Moniteau 10 40.00% 12 48.00% 3 12.00% 25 14.40 10.44
Morgan 29 42.65% 24 35.29% 15 22.06% 68 18.74 7.56
Newton 92 61.75% 32 21.48% 25 16.78% 149 14.31 8.62
Ozark 9 45.00% 5 25.00% 6 30.00% 20 16.80 11.35
Polk 21 36.84% 15 26.32% 21 36.84% 57 23.86 8.88
St Clair 17 65.39% 6 23.08% 3 11.54% 26 13.54 9.88
Stone 26 27.37% 28 29.47% 41 43.16% 95 23.21 9.19
Taney 140 44.03% 84 26.42% 94 29.56% 318 19.88 7.94
Vernon 8 38.10% 6 28.57% 7 33.33% 21 30.57 10.33
Webster 53 60.23% 14 15.91% 21 23.86% 88 16.11 8.64
Wright 48 46.60% 24 23.30% 31 30.10% 103 19.09 8.82
* Region Total * 1,572 47.26% 851 25.59% 903 27.15% 3,326 19.73 8.51
Kansas City Jackson 691 40.08% 512 29.70% 521 30.22% 1,724 21.69 8.34
* Region Total * 691 40.08% 512 29.70% 521 30.22% 1,724 21.69 8.34
St. Louis St Louis City 220 35.14% 167 26.68% 239 38.18% 626 27.38 8.22
St Louis County 416 36.02% 303 26.23% 436 37.75% 1,155 23.35 8.12
* Region Total * 636 35.71% 470 26.39% 675 37.90% 1,781 24.77 8.15
Other Icama 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 8 27.75 8.75
* Region Total * 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 8 27.75 8.75
State Total 5,788 41.69% 3,934 28.33% 4,163 29.98% 13,885 21.23 8.52
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
51Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.24 0.00
Atchison 0 0 7 0 0 7 5.92 5.71
Buchanan 0 42 29 16 4 91 4.34 8.30
Caldwell 0 2 7 0 0 9 3.74 9.33
Carroll 0 2 11 1 0 14 6.39 10.79
Cass 0 54 96 22 14 186 7.05 10.28
Chariton 0 5 1 7 1 14 7.91 13.79
Clay 0 37 87 20 8 152 2.65 7.99
Clinton 0 20 17 7 2 46 9.03 8.30
Cooper 0 4 7 5 1 17 4.27 11.47
Daviess 0 4 8 1 2 15 6.66 9.13
De Kalb 0 13 7 3 1 24 10.39 6.29
Gentry 0 4 11 1 0 16 9.67 6.56
Grundy 0 13 18 0 2 33 13.38 6.09
Harrison 0 8 18 4 1 31 13.96 9.42
Holt 0 3 15 3 0 21 21.63 9.57
Johnson 0 47 51 14 10 122 10.13 7.60
Lafayette 0 17 22 5 3 47 5.74 8.64
Linn 0 30 29 13 7 79 25.03 10.58
Livingston 0 17 33 5 3 58 17.42 8.43
Mercer 0 0 3 0 0 3 3.12 2.33
Nodaway 0 13 41 4 2 60 14.07 8.33
Pettis 0 37 28 5 6 76 7.05 9.61
Platte 0 13 13 10 0 36 1.64 8.89
Putnam 0 8 9 2 2 21 18.10 10.10
Ray 0 5 9 1 0 15 2.56 6.93
Saline 0 10 34 2 4 50 9.27 7.34
Sullivan 0 10 16 5 1 32 19.69 10.59
Worth 0 0 7 0 0 7 15.77 3.57
* Region Total * 0 419 634 156 74 1,283 5.93 8.79
Northeast Adair 0 33 42 15 4 94 18.91 8.70
Audrain 0 21 15 4 4 44 6.91 9.93
Boone 0 76 159 55 18 308 8.99 9.94
Callaway 0 56 93 12 9 170 16.99 9.00
Clark 0 9 19 3 1 32 18.64 7.81
Cole 0 47 79 21 10 157 8.75 7.90
Franklin 0 104 154 28 26 312 12.43 8.44
Gasconade 0 11 15 4 0 30 8.92 9.07
Howard 0 12 22 7 4 45 20.66 10.82
Knox 0 7 5 0 1 13 12.60 9.15
Lewis 0 4 8 0 3 15 6.26 8.20
Lincoln 0 50 83 9 5 147 9.98 8.42
Macon 0 39 37 10 5 91 24.08 8.87
Marion 0 68 97 20 6 191 27.73 9.31
Monroe 0 13 16 3 0 32 15.53 8.38
Montgomery 0 11 28 2 4 45 15.77 8.24
Osage 0 2 4 0 1 7 2.04 4.86
Pike 0 11 24 5 2 42 10.23 9.24
Ralls 0 10 6 2 1 19 7.99 10.95
Randolph 1 40 72 18 4 135 22.96 9.21
Schuyler 0 0 12 1 0 13 11.40 9.46
Scotland 0 3 6 3 1 13 9.54 10.77
Shelby 0 6 5 2 4 17 10.65 11.24
St Charles 2 67 140 24 19 252 2.71 9.26
Warren 0 31 45 9 3 88 10.83 9.10
* Region Total * 3 731 1,186 257 135 2,312 8.87 9.04
Southeast Bollinger 0 7 58 5 4 74 25.37 7.47
Butler 2 63 109 26 11 211 21.16 8.39
Cape Girardeau 0 60 119 33 11 223 13.43 7.99
Carter 0 6 4 2 0 12 7.92 6.08
52Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 1 44 54 22 6 127 21.16 8.56
Dent 0 21 25 9 7 62 16.98 8.44
Dunklin 0 23 68 19 5 115 14.23 7.61
Howell 0 43 51 20 15 129 12.82 9.05
Iron 0 11 16 2 2 31 12.90 7.13
Jefferson 0 171 403 33 16 623 11.33 7.67
Madison 1 11 21 6 2 41 13.99 8.71
Maries 0 4 13 2 0 19 8.82 10.68
Mississippi 0 18 27 6 0 51 16.00 8.04
New Madrid 0 19 92 16 2 129 28.58 9.05
Oregon 0 24 16 7 5 52 21.43 9.52
Pemiscot 0 29 66 19 14 128 25.43 9.50
Perry 0 14 32 6 1 53 11.13 7.34
Phelps 2 63 110 41 9 225 22.98 8.80
Pulaski 0 44 77 36 7 164 13.08 8.37
Reynolds 0 5 21 1 2 29 18.93 7.59
Ripley 0 8 25 8 7 48 14.51 9.38
Scott 0 18 102 11 3 134 13.60 7.35
Shannon 0 4 5 3 2 14 7.10 11.29
St Francois 3 74 134 30 19 260 18.05 8.25
Ste Genevieve 0 9 10 10 4 33 7.82 9.15
Stoddard 0 32 70 31 7 140 20.49 8.64
Texas 0 19 59 14 2 94 16.43 8.04
Washington 0 30 102 19 7 158 26.06 8.98
Wayne 0 24 34 11 3 72 25.66 9.88
* Region Total * 9 898 1,923 448 173 3,451 15.67 8.34
Southwest Barry 2 75 81 16 6 180 20.83 8.01
Barton 0 15 12 2 2 31 9.65 10.48
Bates 0 10 10 1 4 25 5.88 9.48
Benton 0 6 9 6 3 24 6.98 10.58
Camden 0 38 46 6 3 93 11.08 9.32
Cedar 0 5 19 2 5 31 9.37 11.10
Christian 0 50 86 18 5 159 7.51 8.26
Dade 0 7 2 0 1 10 5.60 9.60
Dallas 0 16 21 7 2 46 11.03 7.96
Douglas 0 5 21 2 4 32 10.45 10.00
Greene 4 245 338 69 48 704 12.06 7.90
Henry 0 32 29 5 6 72 14.53 8.42
Hickory 0 4 2 1 1 8 4.80 8.00
Jasper 3 137 249 73 25 487 16.08 9.02
Laclede 0 55 82 10 9 156 17.51 7.67
Lawrence 0 58 76 20 10 164 16.12 8.80
McDonald 0 18 42 6 3 69 10.66 9.28
Miller 0 30 23 8 4 65 10.58 7.95
Moniteau 0 2 20 3 0 25 6.37 10.44
Morgan 0 29 29 6 4 68 15.00 7.56
Newton 1 46 71 21 10 149 10.09 8.62
Ozark 1 6 9 3 1 20 10.26 11.35
Polk 0 26 25 2 4 57 7.44 8.88
St Clair 0 14 7 2 3 26 13.27 9.88
Stone 0 25 54 10 6 95 15.75 9.19
Taney 1 151 124 27 15 318 27.83 7.94
Vernon 0 4 10 4 3 21 3.99 10.33
Webster 0 43 29 11 5 88 8.77 8.64
Wright 1 41 50 6 5 103 21.14 8.82
* Region Total * 13 1,193 1,576 347 197 3,326 12.75 8.51
Kansas City Jackson 11 615 837 121 140 1,724 10.41 8.34
* Region Total * 11 615 837 121 140 1,724 10.41 8.34
St. Louis St Louis City 0 239 260 75 52 626 9.27 8.22
St Louis County 4 398 571 117 65 1,155 4.93 8.12
* Region Total * 4 637 831 192 117 1,781 5.90 8.16
Other Icama 1 5 1 0 1 8 0.00 8.75
* Region Total * 1 5 1 0 1 8 0.00 8.75
State Total 41 4,498 6,988 1,521 837 13,885 9.74 8.52
53Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Chariton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 38 9 0 0 0 0
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Audrain 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Boone 0 0 0 12 1 1 0 0 0
Callaway 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Franklin 0 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 0 0 13 1 0 2 0 0
Warren 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 0 0 72 9 3 2 0 0
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Butler 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
54Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Southeast Crawford 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 0 0 21 3 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 6 0 2 39 13 2 1 0 0
Southwest Barry 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 2 0 2 24 5 0 0 0 0
Henry 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 0 2 1 18 5 0 0 0 0
Laclede 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
McDonald 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0
Newton 1 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0
Taney 1 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Wright 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 5 2 6 87 19 6 0 0 0
Kansas City Jackson 6 0 5 116 13 1 0 0 0
* Region Total * 6 0 5 116 13 1 0 0 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 24 1 2 0 0 0
St Louis County 0 0 0 55 1 1 4 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 79 2 3 4 0 0
Other Icama 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 18 3 13 431 65 15 7 0 0
55Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 1 2 3 32 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 4 2 0 45 3 0 0 0
Chariton 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 1 0 3 31 1 0 0 0
Clinton 0 1 0 1 17 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 1 40 3 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 1 27 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 2 0 2 12 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 2 0 0 32 2 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 1 0 0 7 1 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 16 5 16 344 11 0 0 0
Northeast Adair 0 2 2 0 27 0 0 0 0
Audrain 0 2 0 1 15 1 0 0 0
Boone 0 4 0 1 59 4 0 0 0
Callaway 0 1 0 1 46 1 0 0 0
Clark 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 1 0 3 42 1 0 0 0
Franklin 0 3 1 9 84 9 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 1 0 3 42 3 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 4 2 4 57 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 10 2 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 1 0 2 6 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 2 0 1 5 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 1 0 1 35 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0
St Charles 0 5 0 2 47 4 0 0 0
Warren 0 0 4 1 23 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 31 11 30 587 26 0 0 0
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0
Butler 0 0 0 1 61 0 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0 1 7 51 2 0 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
56Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 1 43 1 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 2 20 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 2 0 0 41 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 11 2 4 133 4 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 0 2 9 1 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 2 0 0 16 1 0 0 0
Oregon 0 1 0 3 20 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 27 5 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 2 12 1 0 0 0
Phelps 0 3 0 1 57 1 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 1 3 0 40 1 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 1 2 2 69 9 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 8 1 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 3 5 21 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 3 1 25 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 1 23 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 21 15 35 788 28 0 0 0
Southwest Barry 0 4 0 4 65 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 2 0 0 36 0 0 0 0
Cedar 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 5 0 1 38 1 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0
Greene 0 25 0 15 181 6 0 0 0
Henry 0 1 0 2 28 3 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Jasper 0 6 0 11 102 4 0 0 0
Laclede 0 0 0 1 49 2 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 2 0 3 49 1 0 0 0
McDonald 0 1 0 1 15 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 1 0 1 27 2 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 1 0 1 26 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 0 0 1 42 1 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 3 1 4 5 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 3 0 1 19 0 0 0 0
Taney 0 6 1 12 120 3 0 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 3 0 3 35 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 0 0 6 33 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 66 5 69 966 25 0 0 0
Kansas City Jackson 0 52 6 52 389 23 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 52 6 52 389 23 0 0 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 27 0 20 168 6 0 0 0
St Louis County 0 35 4 40 264 6 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 62 4 60 432 12 0 0 0
Other Icama 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0
State Total 0 248 46 263 3,510 125 0 0 0
57Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1
Chariton 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 1 0
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Pettis 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 11 25 8 2 2
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Audrain 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
Boone 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0
Callaway 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Cole 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0
Franklin 0 0 0 2 1 6 4 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 1
Marion 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
St Charles 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 1
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 10 9 31 24 2 3
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 2 1 3 2 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
58Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 12 3 0 1
Iron 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
Jefferson 1 1 0 1 1 5 0 0 1
Madison 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0
Pulaski 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 5
Texas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 1
Wayne 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 1 4 13 12 70 10 7 9
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 1
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3
Dade 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1
Douglas 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 0 0 0 2 2 16 6 1 1
Henry 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Jasper 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 3 0
Laclede 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0
Lawrence 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 1
McDonald 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Newton 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 5
Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Taney 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 1
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 1
Wright 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 1 8 15 73 17 8 16
Kansas City Jackson 0 0 0 3 6 41 5 3 10
* Region Total * 0 0 0 3 6 41 5 3 10
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 9 2 2 0 1 3
St Louis County 0 0 0 6 2 9 1 2 3
* Region Total * 0 0 0 15 4 11 1 3 6
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
State Total 1 1 5 50 57 252 65 25 46
59Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 1 12 0 3 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 2 14 0 1 1 0 3 1
Chariton 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 1 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1
Gentry 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1
Johnson 0 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 2 0
Putnam 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Saline 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 2 18 110 2 5 2 0 6 3
Northeast Adair 1 1 7 0 2 0 0 2 0
Audrain 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Boone 0 7 29 1 13 1 0 0 1
Callaway 0 2 4 0 5 0 0 0 1
Clark 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 2 12 2 4 0 0 0 1
Franklin 0 5 19 0 4 0 0 0 2
Gasconade 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 1 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 1
Macon 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 2 0
Marion 0 2 17 0 1 0 0 0 2
Monroe 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
Montgomery 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 1 12 1 1 0 0 0 1
Schuyler 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 0 14 1 5 0 0 1 0
Warren 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 3 32 150 6 39 1 0 6 9
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 4 17 0 1 0 0 2 1
Cape Girardeau 0 18 13 1 0 0 0 1 0
Carter 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
60Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB
Southeast Crawford 0 5 8 1 6 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 1 4 0 3 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 4 12 1 1 0 0 0 0
Howell 1 6 4 4 3 0 0 0 3
Iron 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Jefferson 0 3 19 0 9 0 0 0 4
Madison 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Maries 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0
New Madrid 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 1 0
Oregon 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 3 7 5 3 0 0 1 0
Perry 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 12 15 3 8 0 0 2 0
Pulaski 0 8 9 3 6 0 0 2 0
Reynolds 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 14 11 1 1 0 0 3 0
Ste Genevieve 0 3 4 0 2 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 10 11 0 1 0 0 4 0
Texas 0 4 2 4 2 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 12 5 0 0 0 0 1 0
Wayne 0 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 129 185 28 51 0 0 20 8
Southwest Barry 0 3 7 2 1 0 0 2 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0
Cedar 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 3 8 0 3 0 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0
Douglas 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 0 5 35 4 15 0 3 3 7
Henry 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 0 10 39 3 15 0 0 1 3
Laclede 0 2 3 0 5 0 0 0 1
Lawrence 1 6 8 1 2 0 0 1 0
McDonald 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0
Miller 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 4 9 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ozark 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Stone 1 3 5 0 1 0 0 0 0
Taney 1 3 8 1 9 0 0 1 0
Vernon 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 4 56 162 14 55 0 3 11 11
Kansas City Jackson 1 19 47 14 11 2 5 3 11
* Region Total * 1 19 47 14 11 2 5 3 11
St. Louis St Louis City 0 4 42 1 21 0 0 2 4
St Louis County 1 11 62 1 32 2 0 1 5
* Region Total * 1 15 104 2 53 2 0 3 9
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 12 269 758 66 214 7 8 49 51
61Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Atchison 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Buchanan 0 23 6 1 0 0 0 0 91
Caldwell 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 9
Carroll 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 14
Cass 0 62 33 1 0 2 0 3 186
Chariton 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 14
Clay 4 57 26 1 0 0 1 0 152
Clinton 0 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 46
Cooper 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 17
Daviess 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 15
De Kalb 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 24
Gentry 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 16
Grundy 0 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 33
Harrison 0 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 31
Holt 0 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 21
Johnson 1 35 15 0 0 0 2 0 122
Lafayette 0 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 47
Linn 0 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 79
Livingston 1 23 9 0 0 0 1 0 58
Mercer 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Nodaway 0 25 16 0 0 0 0 0 60
Pettis 0 20 8 0 0 0 0 0 76
Platte 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 36
Putnam 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 21
Ray 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 15
Saline 7 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 50
Sullivan 1 4 11 0 0 0 1 0 32
Worth 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 7
* Region Total * 14 437 180 3 0 2 7 4 1,283
Northeast Adair 2 27 13 0 0 0 2 1 94
Audrain 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 44
Boone 4 103 51 3 0 0 4 3 308
Callaway 3 82 7 0 0 0 1 0 170
Clark 0 15 4 1 0 0 0 0 32
Cole 0 47 31 2 0 0 1 1 157
Franklin 2 112 38 0 0 0 0 0 312
Gasconade 1 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 30
Howard 0 5 17 0 0 0 0 0 45
Knox 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 13
Lewis 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 15
Lincoln 3 50 29 1 0 0 2 0 147
Macon 0 26 11 0 0 0 1 0 91
Marion 5 62 28 0 0 0 0 0 191
Monroe 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 32
Montgomery 0 23 5 0 0 0 0 0 45
Osage 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Pike 0 10 14 0 0 0 0 0 42
Ralls 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 19
Randolph 0 51 20 0 0 0 1 1 135
Schuyler 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 13
Scotland 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 13
Shelby 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 17
St Charles 2 94 44 4 0 0 2 3 252
Warren 1 34 10 1 0 0 1 0 88
* Region Total * 23 818 336 14 0 0 15 9 2,312
Southeast Bollinger 3 31 24 0 0 0 0 0 74
Butler 1 82 25 1 0 0 2 1 211
Cape Girardeau 7 68 44 0 0 0 0 0 223
Carter 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 12
62Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Southeast Crawford 0 41 13 0 0 0 0 1 127
Dent 1 17 7 0 0 0 0 1 62
Dunklin 1 38 29 0 0 0 1 1 115
Howell 0 30 18 0 0 0 1 0 129
Iron 1 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 31
Jefferson 9 263 125 2 0 0 1 0 623
Madison 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Maries 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 19
Mississippi 0 18 9 0 0 0 0 0 51
New Madrid 2 74 16 0 0 0 1 0 129
Oregon 0 10 6 1 0 0 0 1 52
Pemiscot 1 49 16 0 0 1 0 1 128
Perry 3 17 12 0 0 0 1 0 53
Phelps 0 79 31 0 0 0 1 1 225
Pulaski 1 45 31 1 0 0 6 1 164
Reynolds 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 29
Ripley 0 15 10 0 0 0 1 1 48
Scott 1 66 35 0 0 2 0 0 134
Shannon 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 14
St Francois 1 92 41 2 0 0 0 1 260
Ste Genevieve 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 33
Stoddard 0 35 35 0 0 1 0 2 140
Texas 1 48 10 0 0 0 2 1 94
Washington 2 82 16 0 0 0 0 1 158
Wayne 0 21 13 0 0 0 1 0 72
* Region Total * 37 1,294 578 7 0 4 18 14 3,451
Southwest Barry 2 60 19 0 0 0 0 0 180
Barton 0 6 6 0 0 0 1 0 31
Bates 0 8 2 0 0 1 0 1 25
Benton 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 24
Camden 1 30 15 0 0 0 0 1 93
Cedar 0 9 10 0 0 0 0 1 31
Christian 0 65 21 0 0 0 1 1 159
Dade 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10
Dallas 0 12 9 0 0 0 1 0 46
Douglas 1 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 32
Greene 9 244 78 0 0 0 2 11 704
Henry 0 6 23 0 0 0 0 0 72
Hickory 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8
Jasper 2 206 38 1 0 1 2 3 487
Laclede 3 63 15 0 0 0 0 2 156
Lawrence 0 48 28 0 0 1 0 0 164
McDonald 1 25 15 0 0 0 0 1 69
Miller 0 21 2 0 0 0 1 1 65
Moniteau 0 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 25
Morgan 1 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 68
Newton 0 44 27 1 0 0 1 0 149
Ozark 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 20
Polk 1 23 1 0 0 0 1 1 57
St Clair 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 26
Stone 2 44 8 0 0 0 0 0 95
Taney 0 83 41 1 0 0 3 1 318
Vernon 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 21
Webster 0 10 19 1 0 0 3 1 88
Wright 7 40 3 0 0 0 1 2 103
* Region Total * 31 1,124 409 4 0 3 18 27 3,326
Kansas City Jackson 12 377 437 34 1 0 6 13 1,724
* Region Total * 12 377 437 34 1 0 6 13 1,724
St. Louis St Louis City 3 149 104 19 0 0 1 11 626
St Louis County 15 326 225 18 0 0 2 21 1,155
* Region Total * 18 475 329 37 0 0 3 32 1,781
Other Icama 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
State Total 135 4,526 2,269 99 1 9 67 99 13,885
63Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 1
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 2 0 1 0 3
Caldwell 0 0 2 0 0 2
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 1 2 0 1 4
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 1 4 2 0 7
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 5 0 0 5
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 2 0 0 2
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 2 0 1 4
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 1 0 0 0 1
Livingston 0 0 1 0 0 1
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 1 3 0 0 4
Pettis 0 2 2 1 0 5
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 1 0 0 1
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 9 24 5 2 40
Northeast Adair 0 3 0 1 0 4
Audrain 0 1 0 0 0 1
Boone 0 1 1 0 1 3
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 0 2 0 0 2
Cole 0 1 0 0 0 1
Franklin 0 3 1 0 3 7
Gasconade 0 0 1 0 0 1
Howard 0 0 3 0 0 3
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 2 0 1 3
Macon 0 2 2 0 0 4
Marion 0 1 5 0 1 7
Monroe 0 1 0 0 0 1
Montgomery 0 2 0 0 0 2
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 2 0 0 2
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 1 1 3 0 1 6
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 4 0 1 5
St Charles 0 3 5 0 3 11
Warren 0 1 2 0 0 3
* Region Total * 1 20 33 1 11 66
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 1 0 0 1
Butler 0 0 9 2 1 12
Cape Girardeau 0 0 5 1 0 6
Carter 0 1 0 0 0 1
64Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During June 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Southeast Crawford 0 4 4 2 0 10
Dent 0 1 1 1 0 3
Dunklin 0 1 0 1 1 3
Howell 0 3 5 0 1 9
Iron 0 0 0 1 0 1
Jefferson 0 1 24 1 1 27
Madison 0 0 1 0 0 1
Maries 0 1 1 0 0 2
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 2 0 0 2
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 4 0 0 4
Perry 0 0 1 0 0 1
Phelps 0 2 6 2 0 10
Pulaski 0 4 11 1 0 16
Reynolds 0 0 4 0 0 4
Ripley 0 0 1 0 1 2
Scott 0 4 4 0 0 8
Shannon 0 1 0 0 0 1
St Francois 0 4 7 0 0 11
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 1 3 1 0 5
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 1 0 1 2
Wayne 0 0 4 0 0 4
* Region Total * 0 28 99 13 6 146
Southwest Barry 0 0 2 1 1 4
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 1 0 0 1
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 2 0 0 0 2
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 4 0 5 0 0 9
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 3 0 0 3
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 0 10 3 2 3 18
Henry 0 1 5 1 0 7
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 1 7 8 0 1 17
Laclede 0 1 1 1 0 3
Lawrence 0 2 0 1 1 4
McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 4 6 0 0 10
Ozark 0 0 1 1 0 2
Polk 0 0 2 0 0 2
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 2 1 1 0 4
Taney 0 5 3 0 0 8
Vernon 0 3 0 0 1 4
Webster 0 5 5 0 0 10
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 5 42 46 8 7 108
Kansas City Jackson 0 19 11 1 4 35
* Region Total * 0 19 11 1 4 35
St. Louis St Louis City 0 7 14 2 0 23
St Louis County 0 9 8 1 3 21
* Region Total * 0 16 22 3 3 44
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 6 134 235 31 33 439
65Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During June 2020
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 0 1
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 2 0 0 0 4 6
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 2
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 1 0 0 1 8 10
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 4 0 0 0 0 4
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 1 0 0 0 1 2
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 2 0 0 0 0 2
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 1 0 0 1 3 5
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 1 0 0 0 0 1
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 2 0 1 0 0 3
Pettis 3 0 0 0 0 3
Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 18 0 1 2 21 42
Northeast Adair 3 0 0 1 0 4
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0
Boone 0 0 0 1 0 1
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 2 0 0 0 0 2
Cole 1 0 0 0 3 4
Franklin 0 0 0 1 3 4
Gasconade 1 0 0 0 0 1
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 1 2 3
Macon 3 0 0 1 0 4
Marion 5 0 0 2 0 7
Monroe 1 0 0 0 0 1
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 2 0 0 0 0 2
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 1 3 0 0 0 4
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 5 0 0 0 0 5
St Charles 6 0 0 3 4 13
Warren 2 0 0 0 0 2
* Region Total * 32 3 0 10 12 57
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 4 0 0 1 0 5
Cape Girardeau 5 0 0 0 0 5
Carter 1 0 0 0 0 1
Crawford 7 0 0 1 0 8
66Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During June 2020
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Southeast Dent 1 0 0 0 1 2
Dunklin 3 0 0 0 0 3
Howell 4 0 3 0 0 7
Iron 1 0 0 0 0 1
Jefferson 7 0 0 0 4 11
Madison 1 0 0 0 0 1
Maries 1 0 0 0 0 1
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 0 1 0 1
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 3 0 0 0 1 4
Perry 1 0 0 0 0 1
Phelps 4 0 0 1 3 8
Pulaski 3 0 0 0 2 5
Reynolds 3 0 0 0 0 3
Ripley 0 0 0 1 0 1
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 1 0 0 0 7 8
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 3 0 0 0 0 3
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 0 1 1 2
Wayne 0 0 0 0 6 6
* Region Total * 53 0 3 6 25 87
Southwest Barry 1 0 0 1 0 2
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 1 0 0 0 0 1
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 2 0 0 0 0 2
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dade 3 0 0 0 0 3
Dallas 2 0 0 0 0 2
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 2 0 0 3 3 8
Henry 2 0 0 0 1 3
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 10 0 0 2 1 13
Laclede 2 0 0 0 3 5
Lawrence 2 0 0 1 2 5
McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 4 0 0 0 1 5
Ozark 2 0 0 0 0 2
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 2 0 0 1 2 5
Taney 0 0 0 0 1 1
Vernon 4 0 0 0 0 4
Webster 7 0 0 0 0 7
Wright 0 0 0 0 1 1
* Region Total * 46 0 0 8 15 69
Kansas City Jackson 17 0 1 3 1 22
* Region Total * 17 0 1 3 1 22
St. Louis St Louis City 8 0 0 2 5 15
St Louis County 14 0 0 3 3 20
* Region Total * 22 0 0 5 8 35
Other Icama 0 1 0 0 39 40
* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 39 40
State Total 188 4 5 34 121 352
67Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of June 2020
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions No Identified
Legal Status 1 Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 3 2 0 0 5 3
Buchanan 21 4 0 4 29 15
Caldwell 2 0 0 2 4 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 10 3 0 1 14 11
Chariton 2 1 0 0 3 2
Clay 2 3 0 1 6 1
Clinton 19 2 0 0 21 2
Cooper 2 0 0 0 2 0
Daviess 2 0 0 0 2 1
De Kalb 3 0 0 2 5 0
Gentry 3 2 0 0 5 5
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 1 1 0 0 2 1
Holt 4 4 0 0 8 2
Johnson 5 0 0 0 5 3
Lafayette 4 1 0 0 5 3
Linn 12 6 0 0 18 3
Livingston 6 2 0 0 8 1
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 6 0 0 1 7 6
Pettis 10 6 0 0 16 6
Platte 0 1 0 0 1 1
Putnam 4 1 0 0 5 1
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 8 2 0 0 10 2
Sullivan 6 0 0 0 6 2
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 135 41 0 11 187 71
Northeast Adair 7 1 0 0 8 6
Audrain 13 2 0 0 15 8
Boone 33 9 0 4 46 21
Callaway 17 4 0 0 21 13
Clark 4 1 0 0 5 2
Cole 37 3 1 1 42 17
Franklin 50 19 0 3 72 35
Gasconade 7 3 0 0 10 4
Howard 3 0 0 0 3 1
Knox 3 1 0 0 4 1
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 18 22 0 0 40 14
Macon 7 2 0 0 9 8
Marion 12 11 0 0 23 2
Monroe 11 0 0 0 11 5
Montgomery 18 0 0 2 20 4
Osage 1 1 0 0 2 1
Pike 5 1 0 0 6 4
Ralls 3 0 1 0 4 1
Randolph 28 0 0 2 30 21
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 37 14 0 1 52 18
Warren 15 2 0 0 17 5
* Region Total * 329 96 2 13 440 191
Southeast Bollinger 1 0 0 1 2 0
Butler 31 22 0 6 59 37
Cape Girardeau 7 3 0 0 10 7
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 12 2 0 0 14 9
Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 68
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of June 2020
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions No Identified
In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource
Southeast Dent 8 8 0 0 16 14
Dunklin 10 0 0 0 10 8
Howell 4 0 1 3 8 4
Iron 3 2 1 1 7 4
Jefferson 88 25 0 5 118 78
Madison 1 6 0 0 7 3
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 1 5 0 0 6 4
Oregon 0 1 0 0 1 1
Pemiscot 5 3 1 0 9 4
Perry 5 0 0 0 5 1
Phelps 12 4 0 2 18 12
Pulaski 16 4 0 0 20 17
Reynolds 3 4 0 0 7 4
Ripley 2 6 1 1 10 6
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 4 0 0 1 5 4
St Francois 15 29 0 7 51 24
Ste Genevieve 5 3 0 0 8 8
Stoddard 6 1 4 1 12 6
Texas 17 1 0 0 18 7
Washington 5 18 0 0 23 10
Wayne 10 10 0 0 20 17
* Region Total * 271 157 8 28 464 289
Southwest Barry 47 13 2 0 62 15
Barton 10 1 0 0 11 7
Bates 6 0 0 0 6 1
Benton 7 0 0 0 7 0
Camden 12 2 0 0 14 10
Cedar 10 0 0 0 10 2
Christian 17 9 0 4 30 12
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 10 2 0 0 12 8
Douglas 1 1 0 0 2 1
Greene 131 73 0 7 211 95
Henry 17 0 0 0 17 7
Hickory 5 1 0 0 6 1
Jasper 107 6 4 2 119 63
Laclede 19 6 1 0 26 18
Lawrence 25 22 0 1 48 14
McDonald 8 2 0 0 10 8
Miller 6 2 0 0 8 2
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 6 0 0 0 6 0
Newton 12 6 0 6 24 8
Ozark 5 1 0 0 6 5
Polk 13 0 0 0 13 7
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 18 5 0 1 24 7
Taney 49 23 0 5 77 27
Vernon 2 1 0 0 3 3
Webster 7 0 1 0 8 3
Wright 29 1 0 0 30 16
* Region Total * 579 177 8 26 790 340
Kansas City Jackson 259 139 1 12 411 288
* Region Total * 259 139 1 12 411 288
St. Louis St Louis City 121 18 0 4 143 111
St Louis County 194 39 0 4 237 196
* Region Total * 315 57 0 8 380 307
Other Icama 2 0 32 0 34 1
* Region Total * 2 0 32 0 34 1
State Total 1,890 667 51 98 2,706 1,487
Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 69
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of June 2020
by Vendor Type and County
Large Current Licensed
Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 15 1 1 12 13 14 -7.14%
Atchison 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 4 1 300.00%
Buchanan 4 0 0 40 24 0 43 57 52 9.62%
Caldwell 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 5 10 -50.00%
Carroll 0 0 0 2 4 0 5 6 2 200.00%
Cass 3 0 0 40 37 1 52 70 70 0.00%
Chariton 0 0 0 1 5 1 4 6 7 -14.29%
Clay 3 0 0 100 61 4 105 149 153 -2.61%
Clinton 0 0 0 16 4 1 10 17 17 0.00%
Cooper 1 0 0 5 7 1 9 9 7 28.57%
Daviess 0 0 0 3 4 0 7 7 9 -22.22%
De Kalb 1 0 0 6 3 1 6 9 10 -10.00%
Gentry 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 5 9 -44.44%
Grundy 0 0 0 3 7 0 6 10 9 11.11%
Harrison 0 0 0 2 9 2 9 11 12 -8.33%
Holt 0 0 0 3 9 0 10 10 7 42.86%
Johnson 1 1 0 24 25 4 36 48 43 11.63%
Lafayette 3 0 0 12 11 0 18 20 22 -9.09%
Linn 1 0 0 14 9 0 20 21 14 50.00%
Livingston 0 0 0 9 11 0 12 18 18 0.00%
Mercer 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0.00%
Nodaway 0 0 0 8 15 1 13 22 26 -15.39%
Pettis 2 0 0 18 12 1 21 24 32 -25.00%
Platte 1 0 0 27 22 0 32 47 36 30.56%
Putnam 0 0 0 4 5 0 6 9 8 12.50%
Ray 1 0 0 5 6 2 9 10 7 42.86%
Saline 2 0 0 5 11 0 13 14 13 7.69%
Sullivan 0 0 0 3 5 0 6 7 2 250.00%
Worth 1 0 0 2 5 0 5 6 3 100.00%
* Region Total * 24 1 0 373 324 20 485 637 616 3.41%
Northeast Adair 2 0 0 21 17 3 29 34 39 -12.82%
Audrain 0 0 0 13 14 1 19 25 33 -24.24%
Boone 4 0 0 37 37 5 51 69 72 -4.17%
Callaway 0 0 0 12 40 2 45 51 47 8.51%
Clark 0 0 0 2 10 1 7 12 10 20.00%
Cole 1 0 0 39 20 3 42 52 45 15.56%
Franklin 3 0 0 41 54 1 79 91 121 -24.79%
Gasconade 0 0 0 6 6 0 11 12 18 -33.33%
Howard 1 0 0 5 3 0 7 7 11 -36.36%
Knox 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 1 100.00%
Lewis 1 0 0 8 7 2 11 14 12 16.67%
Lincoln 5 0 0 41 26 1 47 60 60 0.00%
Macon 0 0 0 17 14 2 23 30 31 -3.23%
Marion 4 0 0 27 24 0 43 47 59 -20.34%
Monroe 1 0 0 12 7 0 15 18 16 12.50%
Montgomery 0 0 0 7 12 1 13 19 21 -9.52%
Osage 0 0 0 2 5 2 7 7 7 0.00%
Pike 0 0 0 8 11 0 16 19 17 11.77%
Ralls 0 0 0 10 12 0 19 21 28 -25.00%
Randolph 5 0 0 14 27 3 31 39 38 2.63%
Schuyler 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 6 7 -14.29%
Scotland 0 0 0 3 4 0 5 6 11 -45.46%
Shelby 0 0 0 6 6 0 6 11 10 10.00%
St Charles 14 0 0 93 56 2 103 137 145 -5.52%
Warren 1 0 0 20 17 0 26 36 44 -18.18%
* Region Total * 42 0 0 448 435 29 663 825 903 -8.64%
Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 2 20 0 21 23 19 21.05%
Butler 1 0 0 43 44 0 69 80 78 2.56%
Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 31 51 0 65 81 94 -13.83%
Carter 0 0 0 4 5 0 7 8 8 0.00%
70Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of June 2020
by Vendor Type and County
Large Current Licensed
Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 9 28 1 30 37 27 37.04%
Dent 1 0 0 10 12 0 16 22 23 -4.35%
Dunklin 0 0 0 19 22 0 37 41 42 -2.38%
Howell 0 0 0 21 22 0 33 41 53 -22.64%
Iron 0 0 0 8 10 2 15 18 22 -18.18%
Jefferson 4 0 0 56 96 6 126 147 144 2.08%
Madison 0 0 0 6 12 1 12 17 23 -26.09%
Maries 0 0 0 4 7 0 6 10 9 11.11%
Mississippi 0 0 0 7 16 0 21 23 19 21.05%
New Madrid 1 0 0 17 35 0 46 51 42 21.43%
Oregon 0 0 0 4 4 0 8 8 9 -11.11%
Pemiscot 1 0 0 15 19 0 28 34 41 -17.07%
Perry 0 0 0 7 15 0 22 22 27 -18.52%
Phelps 3 0 0 22 37 1 50 58 51 13.73%
Pulaski 0 0 0 18 15 1 29 33 41 -19.51%
Reynolds 0 0 0 5 13 0 14 18 14 28.57%
Ripley 0 0 0 16 16 0 24 28 30 -6.67%
Scott 0 0 0 17 43 0 51 59 63 -6.35%
Shannon 1 0 0 6 2 1 6 8 10 -20.00%
St Francois 1 0 0 42 45 5 73 84 90 -6.67%
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 5 9 1 10 14 16 -12.50%
Stoddard 0 0 0 16 17 1 27 33 42 -21.43%
Texas 0 0 0 14 18 1 28 32 32 0.00%
Washington 0 0 0 8 34 3 38 42 35 20.00%
Wayne 0 0 0 8 11 0 14 18 22 -18.18%
* Region Total * 14 1 0 440 678 24 926 1,090 1,126 -3.20%
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 17 23 0 32 38 43 -11.63%
Barton 0 0 0 14 6 0 15 18 24 -25.00%
Bates 1 0 0 13 9 2 14 20 24 -16.67%
Benton 0 0 0 8 6 0 12 14 15 -6.67%
Camden 1 0 0 11 17 0 24 27 30 -10.00%
Cedar 0 0 0 6 4 0 6 10 15 -33.33%
Christian 12 0 0 100 41 4 90 132 118 11.86%
Dade 1 0 0 4 2 0 5 5 7 -28.57%
Dallas 0 0 0 9 6 0 14 14 16 -12.50%
Douglas 0 0 0 18 10 1 17 26 26 0.00%
Greene 14 0 0 221 110 8 207 283 266 6.39%
Henry 1 0 0 18 5 0 14 21 36 -41.67%
Hickory 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 6 12 -50.00%
Jasper 11 0 0 79 107 10 145 170 156 8.97%
Laclede 2 0 0 22 23 3 33 42 45 -6.67%
Lawrence 2 0 0 33 25 0 42 49 58 -15.52%
McDonald 1 0 0 13 10 0 18 21 27 -22.22%
Miller 0 0 0 7 11 2 17 18 22 -18.18%
Moniteau 0 0 0 9 4 0 11 11 16 -31.25%
Morgan 0 0 0 7 11 0 18 18 22 -18.18%
Newton 5 0 0 35 42 2 64 73 72 1.39%
Ozark 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 8 7 14.29%
Polk 3 0 0 24 15 1 25 36 46 -21.74%
St Clair 1 0 0 5 3 0 6 8 11 -27.27%
Stone 4 0 0 29 19 1 30 38 37 2.70%
Taney 7 0 0 59 28 1 54 85 97 -12.37%
Vernon 0 0 0 15 3 1 8 18 20 -10.00%
Webster 2 0 0 24 12 1 21 33 42 -21.43%
Wright 0 0 0 20 20 2 28 38 40 -5.00%
* Region Total * 68 0 0 824 582 39 980 1,280 1,350 -5.19%
Kansas City Jackson 50 0 0 361 207 18 361 474 534 -11.24%
* Region Total * 50 0 0 361 207 18 361 474 534 -11.24%
St. Louis St Louis City 15 0 0 62 53 4 81 107 137 -21.90%
St Louis County 51 3 0 192 183 7 255 329 409 -19.56%
* Region Total * 66 3 0 254 236 11 336 436 546 -20.15%
State Total 264 5 0 2,700 2,462 141 3,751 4,742 5,075 -6.56%
71Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4
Atchison 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 13
Buchanan 91 0 0 1 123 0 0 74 0 289
Caldwell 9 0 0 0 142 0 0 64 0 215
Carroll 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Cass 186 0 0 2 283 1 1 75 0 548
Chariton 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15
Clay 152 0 0 10 482 0 0 132 0 776
Clinton 46 0 0 0 8 0 0 16 0 70
Cooper 17 0 0 0 4 0 0 58 0 79
Daviess 15 0 0 0 13 0 0 6 0 34
De Kalb 24 0 0 0 177 0 0 79 0 280
Gentry 16 0 0 0 5 0 0 14 0 35
Grundy 33 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 34
Harrison 31 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 32
Holt 21 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 32
Johnson 122 0 0 3 143 1 1 56 0 326
Lafayette 47 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 55
Linn 79 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 87
Livingston 58 0 0 0 10 0 0 9 0 77
Mercer 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Nodaway 60 0 0 0 33 0 0 38 0 131
Pettis 76 0 0 0 148 0 0 20 0 244
Platte 36 0 0 6 154 0 0 28 0 224
Putnam 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Ray 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 16
Saline 50 0 0 3 144 0 2 45 0 244
Sullivan 32 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 37
Worth 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 18
* Region Total * 1,283 0 0 27 1,904 2 4 733 0 3,953
Northeast Adair 94 0 0 0 78 0 0 46 0 218
Audrain 44 0 0 1 69 1 0 44 0 159
Boone 308 0 1 3 373 0 0 260 0 945
Callaway 170 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 180
Clark 32 0 0 0 6 0 0 22 0 60
Cole 157 1 0 20 198 0 0 110 0 486
Franklin 312 0 0 0 394 0 0 137 0 843
Gasconade 30 0 0 0 16 0 0 4 0 50
Howard 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 64
Knox 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13
Lewis 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 18
Lincoln 147 0 0 3 138 2 2 81 0 373
Macon 91 0 0 0 49 0 0 33 0 173
Marion 191 0 0 0 110 0 0 59 0 360
Monroe 32 0 0 0 15 0 0 10 0 57
Montgomery 45 0 0 0 18 0 0 24 0 87
Osage 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 18
Pike 42 0 0 0 28 0 0 17 0 87
Ralls 19 1 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 32
Randolph 135 0 0 1 119 0 0 98 0 353
Schuyler 13 0 0 0 10 0 0 3 0 26
Scotland 13 0 0 0 5 0 0 12 0 30
Shelby 17 0 0 0 28 0 0 9 0 54
St Charles 252 0 0 8 485 0 0 184 0 929
Warren 88 0 0 2 106 0 0 55 0 251
* Region Total * 2,312 2 1 38 2,261 3 2 1,247 0 5,866
Southeast Bollinger 74 0 0 0 20 0 1 16 0 111
Butler 211 0 0 1 18 0 0 4 0 234
Cape Girardeau 223 0 0 3 164 0 1 207 0 598
Carter 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 18
Crawford 127 0 0 3 26 0 0 24 0 180
72Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Southeast Dent 62 0 0 0 13 0 2 3 0 80
Dunklin 115 0 0 0 10 0 0 14 0 139
Howell 129 1 0 4 134 0 0 39 0 307
Iron 31 1 0 1 113 0 0 70 0 216
Jefferson 623 0 0 6 530 3 0 523 0 1,685
Madison 41 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 46
Maries 19 0 0 0 22 0 1 15 0 57
Mississippi 51 0 0 0 9 0 0 48 0 108
New Madrid 129 0 0 0 5 0 0 38 0 172
Oregon 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 58
Pemiscot 128 1 0 0 96 0 0 141 0 366
Perry 53 0 0 0 36 0 0 14 0 103
Phelps 225 0 0 0 90 1 3 80 0 399
Pulaski 164 0 0 4 234 0 0 123 0 525
Reynolds 29 0 0 0 12 0 1 11 0 53
Ripley 48 1 0 0 267 0 0 190 0 506
Scott 134 0 0 1 76 0 0 205 0 416
Shannon 14 0 0 0 8 0 0 15 0 37
St Francois 260 0 0 0 518 0 1 146 0 925
Ste Genevieve 33 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 34
Stoddard 140 4 0 0 247 0 0 258 0 649
Texas 94 0 0 0 53 0 0 31 0 178
Washington 158 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 166
Wayne 72 0 0 4 110 0 0 67 0 253
* Region Total * 3,451 8 0 28 2,822 4 12 2,294 0 8,619
Southwest Barry 180 2 0 0 115 1 0 34 0 332
Barton 31 0 0 0 80 0 0 17 0 128
Bates 25 0 0 3 17 0 0 10 0 55
Benton 24 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 26
Camden 93 0 0 0 13 0 0 17 0 123
Cedar 31 0 0 0 37 0 0 9 0 77
Christian 159 0 0 1 402 0 0 52 0 614
Dade 10 0 0 2 27 0 0 3 0 42
Dallas 46 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 48
Douglas 32 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 35
Greene 704 0 0 10 1,278 4 3 182 0 2,181
Henry 72 0 0 0 138 1 1 75 0 287
Hickory 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Jasper 487 4 0 4 683 3 4 148 0 1,333
Laclede 156 1 0 0 428 1 0 119 0 705
Lawrence 164 0 0 0 35 0 1 9 0 209
McDonald 69 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 70
Miller 65 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 68
Moniteau 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26
Morgan 68 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 0 77
Newton 149 0 0 2 452 0 1 100 0 704
Ozark 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
Polk 57 0 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 71
St Clair 26 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 37
Stone 95 0 0 0 318 0 0 78 0 491
Taney 318 0 0 1 201 2 0 94 0 616
Vernon 21 0 0 0 35 0 0 4 0 60
Webster 88 1 0 0 437 0 0 140 0 666
Wright 103 0 0 0 146 1 0 85 0 335
* Region Total * 3,326 8 0 25 4,875 14 11 1,185 0 9,444
Kansas City Jackson 1,724 1 0 38 2,617 25 7 522 0 4,934
* Region Total * 1,724 1 0 38 2,617 25 7 522 0 4,934
St. Louis St Louis City 626 0 0 4 855 5 0 487 0 1,977
St Louis County 1,155 0 1 28 1,170 8 7 627 0 2,996
* Region Total * 1,781 0 1 32 2,025 13 7 1,114 0 4,973
Other Icama 8 32 0 30 2,021 0 0 40 0 2,131
* Region Total * 8 32 0 30 2,021 0 0 40 0 2,131
State Total 13,885 51 2 218 18,525 61 43 7,135 0 39,920
73Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Atchison 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 7
Buchanan 56 25 0 4 4 2 0 91
Caldwell 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 9
Carroll 8 0 0 0 2 0 4 14
Cass 138 13 0 14 13 1 7 186
Chariton 3 3 0 4 4 0 0 14
Clay 120 5 0 11 15 0 1 152
Clinton 16 21 0 3 5 0 1 46
Cooper 11 2 0 3 1 0 0 17
Daviess 10 2 0 2 1 0 0 15
De Kalb 15 3 0 1 4 0 1 24
Gentry 9 5 0 0 2 0 0 16
Grundy 31 0 0 0 1 1 0 33
Harrison 23 2 0 1 5 0 0 31
Holt 11 8 0 0 2 0 0 21
Johnson 104 5 0 6 3 0 4 122
Lafayette 37 5 0 4 1 0 0 47
Linn 48 18 0 4 9 0 0 79
Livingston 43 8 0 5 1 0 1 58
Mercer 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Nodaway 33 6 0 4 9 1 7 60
Pettis 46 16 0 4 8 2 0 76
Platte 32 1 0 2 0 0 1 36
Putnam 6 5 0 1 7 1 1 21
Ray 12 0 0 0 1 0 2 15
Saline 31 10 0 1 7 0 1 50
Sullivan 13 6 0 2 2 5 4 32
Worth 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 7
* Region Total * 873 176 0 76 107 13 38 1,283
Northeast Adair 68 8 0 6 6 1 5 94
Audrain 14 15 0 8 6 0 1 44
Boone 195 42 0 35 34 0 2 308
Callaway 128 21 0 7 14 0 0 170
Clark 19 5 0 3 4 1 0 32
Cole 83 40 0 9 10 3 12 157
Franklin 173 69 0 26 34 5 5 312
Gasconade 18 10 0 1 1 0 0 30
Howard 26 3 0 5 6 1 4 45
Knox 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 13
Lewis 11 0 0 3 1 0 0 15
Lincoln 77 40 0 15 15 0 0 147
Macon 70 9 0 7 1 1 3 91
Marion 122 23 0 11 24 2 9 191
Monroe 17 11 0 3 1 0 0 32
Montgomery 18 18 0 5 4 0 0 45
Osage 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 7
Pike 25 6 0 7 2 0 2 42
Ralls 8 3 0 5 3 0 0 19
Randolph 70 28 0 7 22 1 7 135
Schuyler 8 0 0 0 5 0 0 13
Scotland 8 0 0 1 4 0 0 13
Shelby 11 0 0 5 1 0 0 17
St Charles 141 51 0 32 23 0 5 252
Warren 43 17 0 8 14 3 3 88
* Region Total * 1,366 425 0 210 235 18 58 2,312
Southeast Bollinger 67 1 0 1 5 0 0 74
Butler 93 53 0 23 31 6 5 211
Cape Girardeau 185 10 0 10 15 0 3 223
Carter 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 12
74Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Southeast Crawford 67 14 0 9 26 9 2 127
Dent 29 16 0 4 10 0 3 62
Dunklin 82 10 0 5 13 5 0 115
Howell 89 4 0 16 13 4 3 129
Iron 13 5 0 0 8 0 5 31
Jefferson 334 113 0 40 113 17 6 623
Madison 30 7 0 4 0 0 0 41
Maries 14 0 0 2 3 0 0 19
Mississippi 37 0 0 3 11 0 0 51
New Madrid 92 6 0 3 21 7 0 129
Oregon 45 1 0 6 0 0 0 52
Pemiscot 67 8 0 15 36 0 2 128
Perry 43 5 0 3 1 0 1 53
Phelps 177 16 0 11 18 0 3 225
Pulaski 108 20 0 13 17 1 5 164
Reynolds 16 7 0 0 6 0 0 29
Ripley 19 8 0 10 10 1 0 48
Scott 95 0 0 2 37 0 0 134
Shannon 6 4 0 4 0 0 0 14
St Francois 170 44 0 28 11 3 4 260
Ste Genevieve 18 8 0 3 1 0 3 33
Stoddard 97 7 0 13 20 0 3 140
Texas 48 18 0 7 20 0 1 94
Washington 111 23 0 12 6 5 1 158
Wayne 41 20 0 4 4 0 3 72
* Region Total * 2,204 428 0 252 456 58 53 3,451
Southwest Barry 90 60 0 10 17 0 3 180
Barton 9 11 0 5 0 0 6 31
Bates 12 6 0 4 3 0 0 25
Benton 8 7 0 7 1 1 0 24
Camden 67 14 0 5 4 3 0 93
Cedar 10 10 0 2 9 0 0 31
Christian 104 26 0 8 15 1 5 159
Dade 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Dallas 29 12 0 3 1 1 0 46
Douglas 26 2 0 1 3 0 0 32
Greene 405 204 0 55 28 3 9 704
Henry 44 17 0 5 3 0 3 72
Hickory 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 8
Jasper 297 113 0 37 36 2 2 487
Laclede 111 25 0 16 3 0 1 156
Lawrence 83 47 0 16 15 0 3 164
McDonald 47 10 0 6 3 0 3 69
Miller 41 8 0 7 8 1 0 65
Moniteau 19 0 0 0 6 0 0 25
Morgan 60 6 0 1 0 0 1 68
Newton 105 18 0 11 12 0 3 149
Ozark 12 6 0 2 0 0 0 20
Polk 29 13 0 7 7 0 1 57
St Clair 21 0 0 3 1 0 1 26
Stone 52 23 0 3 17 0 0 95
Taney 195 72 0 20 23 3 5 318
Vernon 14 3 0 3 1 0 0 21
Webster 64 7 0 8 8 0 1 88
Wright 62 30 0 7 4 0 0 103
* Region Total * 2,027 756 0 253 228 15 47 3,326
Kansas City Jackson 1,007 398 0 116 113 21 69 1,724
* Region Total * 1,007 398 0 116 113 21 69 1,724
St. Louis St Louis City 322 139 0 58 71 22 14 626
St Louis County 654 233 0 90 113 30 35 1,155
* Region Total * 976 372 0 148 184 52 49 1,781
Other Icama 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 8
* Region Total * 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 8
State Total 8,455 2,557 0 1,056 1,325 177 315 13,885
75Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.00
Atchison 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 2.57
Buchanan 30 16 20 2 2 9 2 10 91 5.16
Caldwell 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 9 2.44
Carroll 5 2 5 1 0 0 1 0 14 2.79
Cass 45 58 30 10 11 19 5 7 186 4.38
Chariton 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 7 14 22.57
Clay 60 39 13 4 7 9 6 14 152 4.54
Clinton 12 13 8 4 0 5 0 4 46 4.37
Cooper 7 1 1 1 1 5 0 1 17 6.24
Daviess 6 4 1 1 0 2 1 0 15 3.27
De Kalb 5 12 0 0 2 4 1 0 24 3.21
Gentry 7 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 2.19
Grundy 11 10 10 0 0 2 0 0 33 2.33
Harrison 17 3 6 0 0 2 2 1 31 4.19
Holt 14 2 0 0 0 1 1 3 21 5.71
Johnson 42 27 12 8 8 15 5 3 122 3.57
Lafayette 12 18 3 3 0 7 0 4 47 5.32
Linn 16 22 11 9 4 6 7 4 79 5.32
Livingston 11 22 13 3 3 5 0 1 58 3.16
Mercer 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.00
Nodaway 34 6 3 3 7 4 2 1 60 3.13
Pettis 35 13 8 4 4 6 2 4 76 4.25
Platte 7 11 3 3 0 7 1 4 36 6.89
Putnam 5 5 4 2 3 1 1 0 21 3.24
Ray 3 7 4 0 0 0 0 1 15 3.13
Saline 21 16 3 1 4 1 0 3 50 3.70
Sullivan 16 5 3 1 0 5 0 2 32 3.94
Worth 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.00
* Region Total * 435 327 169 61 57 116 40 74 1,283 4.40
Northeast Adair 27 30 9 8 5 7 3 5 94 4.15
Audrain 8 3 9 0 1 11 3 8 44 10.75
Boone 90 69 33 20 13 41 19 23 308 5.65
Callaway 60 31 21 11 6 27 7 7 170 4.35
Clark 9 7 2 4 4 2 2 2 32 5.41
Cole 52 26 29 7 11 20 8 3 157 4.05
Franklin 122 48 35 24 23 35 11 13 312 3.95
Gasconade 8 8 3 1 2 4 2 2 30 4.80
Howard 13 4 7 5 2 9 2 3 45 6.04
Knox 0 5 4 2 1 1 0 0 13 3.15
Lewis 5 5 1 1 0 0 3 0 15 4.07
Lincoln 55 33 20 15 5 12 3 4 147 3.46
Macon 41 18 14 4 3 7 1 3 91 3.32
Marion 76 36 25 15 11 10 9 9 191 3.91
Monroe 12 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 32 4.53
Montgomery 16 8 9 7 2 2 0 1 45 3.49
Osage 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 1.71
Pike 23 11 2 0 0 3 1 2 42 3.02
Ralls 7 4 2 0 0 3 1 2 19 4.58
Randolph 46 25 15 11 9 15 5 8 135 4.24
Schuyler 7 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 13 5.31
Scotland 3 1 1 3 0 2 2 1 13 6.92
Shelby 4 4 1 2 1 1 1 3 17 9.06
St Charles 89 54 34 23 5 31 11 5 252 3.60
Warren 26 22 15 2 7 10 5 1 88 3.90
* Region Total * 801 462 295 169 114 258 101 107 2,312 4.38
Southeast Bollinger 28 20 8 5 6 2 1 3 74 3.49
Butler 85 40 30 15 5 16 9 11 211 4.27
Cape Girardeau 81 54 26 17 11 15 10 7 223 3.67
Carter 2 4 1 2 0 3 0 0 12 3.42
76Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Southeast Crawford 49 36 10 6 8 7 4 6 127 3.89
Dent 15 18 10 4 0 7 5 3 62 4.94
Dunklin 56 26 12 3 5 7 1 5 115 3.30
Howell 34 34 26 6 4 12 3 10 129 4.56
Iron 14 8 2 4 0 0 1 1 31 2.84
Jefferson 280 130 62 44 26 48 15 17 623 3.21
Madison 12 8 4 3 6 2 1 5 41 6.12
Maries 9 6 2 1 1 0 0 0 19 1.89
Mississippi 23 9 7 5 0 3 2 2 51 3.73
New Madrid 50 28 11 16 3 10 5 6 129 3.70
Oregon 15 12 8 2 2 8 3 2 52 4.08
Pemiscot 45 24 10 11 5 14 8 10 128 5.24
Perry 22 18 6 1 0 3 0 3 53 4.28
Phelps 89 56 24 13 7 20 7 8 225 3.57
Pulaski 56 39 19 8 9 20 7 4 164 3.57
Reynolds 14 7 3 3 0 0 2 0 29 2.69
Ripley 16 8 2 8 1 4 6 3 48 5.85
Scott 70 17 13 7 6 16 2 3 134 3.19
Shannon 2 3 3 1 0 4 0 1 14 5.21
St Francois 88 62 29 14 14 30 8 14 260 4.70
Ste Genevieve 7 9 8 0 1 4 1 3 33 4.97
Stoddard 34 50 21 6 6 13 4 5 140 3.48
Texas 46 15 3 9 3 13 2 2 94 3.35
Washington 40 34 20 24 3 14 9 14 158 5.70
Wayne 13 18 13 5 1 15 5 2 72 4.51
* Region Total * 1,295 793 393 243 133 310 121 150 3,451 3.94
Southwest Barry 67 42 34 12 6 8 4 5 180 3.24
Barton 19 2 0 4 1 2 1 2 31 5.77
Bates 7 8 4 3 1 1 1 0 25 2.80
Benton 4 10 2 2 1 2 2 1 24 4.46
Camden 39 19 13 7 1 7 0 7 93 3.94
Cedar 8 8 3 4 1 1 2 3 31 6.55
Christian 60 32 22 16 14 11 2 2 159 2.96
Dade 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 2.00
Dallas 16 11 6 2 1 5 2 3 46 4.78
Douglas 15 7 6 1 1 0 0 1 32 2.50
Greene 322 154 61 35 31 52 20 26 704 3.41
Henry 26 15 9 9 2 5 2 3 72 3.65
Hickory 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 8 11.25
Jasper 151 114 62 26 30 55 27 22 487 4.23
Laclede 56 37 16 10 10 19 3 5 156 3.70
Lawrence 69 24 18 12 11 12 10 8 164 4.24
McDonald 24 16 12 5 0 8 2 2 69 3.64
Miller 18 18 3 9 2 10 1 4 65 5.26
Moniteau 9 8 4 0 1 2 0 1 25 3.12
Morgan 28 13 7 8 5 6 1 0 68 2.78
Newton 53 37 27 7 5 14 2 4 149 3.17
Ozark 6 8 2 1 0 1 2 0 20 3.20
Polk 24 14 2 2 2 10 1 1 57 3.68
St Clair 13 1 4 2 1 1 2 1 26 4.27
Stone 37 20 11 6 7 7 2 5 95 3.78
Taney 134 65 32 26 21 24 4 12 318 3.63
Vernon 10 3 1 0 0 2 2 3 21 6.90
Webster 35 26 12 3 1 2 3 5 88 3.77
Wright 39 28 12 9 1 3 1 8 103 3.96
* Region Total * 1,293 746 389 221 159 270 99 136 3,326 3.76
Kansas City Jackson 676 339 197 113 98 153 66 72 1,724 3.77
* Region Total * 676 339 197 113 98 153 66 72 1,724 3.77
St. Louis St Louis City 205 135 63 43 40 69 30 36 626 4.72
St Louis County 427 271 145 75 68 99 33 33 1,155 3.58
* Region Total * 632 406 208 118 108 168 63 69 1,781 3.98
Other Icama 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 8.13
* Region Total * 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 8.13
State Total 5,135 3,076 1,651 925 669 1,275 490 610 13,885 4.00
77Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2020 Adoptions are Year to Date June 2020)
Total
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Adoptions
Northwest Andrew 0 0 2 0 0 1 3
Atchison 0 1 3 2 0 0 6
Buchanan 5 4 16 20 25 12 82
Caldwell 11 10 3 3 2 7 36
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 18 25 32 36 22 24 157
Chariton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Clay 43 41 46 59 53 33 275
Clinton 1 2 3 0 0 2 8
Cooper 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
Daviess 0 0 3 3 7 2 15
De Kalb 10 24 21 43 33 42 173
Gentry 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Holt 0 2 2 0 0 3 7
Johnson 12 7 15 12 16 23 85
Lafayette 0 0 1 0 0 2 3
Linn 0 0 0 0 3 3 6
Livingston 0 4 0 0 4 2 10
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 4 2 0 4 2 12
Pettis 8 5 7 20 15 12 67
Platte 17 12 21 17 13 10 90
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 20 6 20 11 17 6 80
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 1 4 5
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 145 150 198 227 216 191 1,127
Northeast Adair 10 6 15 8 6 9 54
Audrain 13 10 15 8 7 5 58
Boone 29 42 40 42 47 46 246
Callaway 0 1 2 1 5 2 11
Clark 0 3 1 0 2 1 7
Cole 10 33 24 19 19 17 122
Franklin 36 23 29 57 54 58 257
Gasconade 2 0 2 6 3 1 14
Howard 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 13 15 10 30 14 14 96
Macon 8 4 3 4 2 7 28
Marion 15 12 13 10 16 11 77
Monroe 2 1 0 2 8 1 14
Montgomery 0 1 0 2 2 6 11
Osage 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Pike 2 1 0 2 12 3 20
Ralls 2 1 3 1 1 1 9
Randolph 1 9 10 16 23 15 74
Schuyler 0 2 0 1 0 1 4
Scotland 0 2 1 0 1 0 4
Shelby 2 6 2 2 0 0 12
St Charles 35 42 42 48 51 58 276
Warren 3 3 15 12 9 11 53
* Region Total * 183 217 229 272 282 267 1,450
Southeast Bollinger 5 0 3 2 3 1 14
Butler 1 4 1 0 1 16 23
Cape Girardeau 3 16 24 22 32 33 130
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 0 0 0 10 11 4 25
78Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2020 Adoptions are Year to Date June 2020)
Total
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Adoptions
Southeast Dent 1 0 2 1 10 0 14
Dunklin 0 0 1 2 4 2 9
Howell 7 6 5 15 13 29 75
Iron 3 4 16 8 23 28 82
Jefferson 43 46 41 59 59 39 287
Madison 1 0 0 2 1 0 4
Maries 0 5 2 8 0 7 22
Mississippi 0 0 4 2 1 1 8
New Madrid 0 3 0 0 1 3 7
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 1 16 9 15 12 53
Perry 3 2 6 4 9 1 25
Phelps 9 16 17 9 18 17 86
Pulaski 13 24 14 19 16 22 108
Reynolds 0 0 5 4 4 0 13
Ripley 27 56 43 30 13 24 193
Scott 8 8 9 9 4 5 43
Shannon 0 0 1 0 0 8 9
St Francois 34 29 34 52 74 105 328
Ste Genevieve 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Stoddard 18 17 24 31 35 19 144
Texas 8 10 21 3 10 3 55
Washington 0 1 1 2 1 0 5
Wayne 1 14 14 8 8 2 47
* Region Total * 186 262 305 311 366 381 1,811
Southwest Barry 2 1 0 0 3 4 10
Barton 16 3 2 9 8 5 43
Bates 0 1 0 8 4 4 17
Benton 1 0 2 0 0 0 3
Camden 1 0 0 2 0 8 11
Cedar 8 1 5 0 7 2 23
Christian 23 39 48 42 40 49 241
Dade 2 3 2 6 6 0 19
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Douglas 2 0 0 0 0 2 4
Greene 84 133 136 117 137 91 698
Henry 13 14 9 20 8 10 74
Hickory 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Jasper 73 68 55 62 57 35 350
Laclede 43 29 45 59 59 13 248
Lawrence 2 6 11 4 5 13 41
McDonald 0 3 2 0 0 0 5
Miller 0 0 0 0 2 1 3
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 7 7
Newton 46 57 34 28 37 33 235
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 1 1 0 7 9
St Clair 0 0 1 0 2 2 5
Stone 36 43 41 39 36 11 206
Taney 16 20 25 29 22 26 138
Vernon 6 0 11 3 8 4 32
Webster 23 38 58 57 32 39 247
Wright 10 34 11 9 27 23 114
* Region Total * 408 493 499 495 500 390 2,785
Kansas City Jackson 241 274 241 281 296 258 1,591
* Region Total * 241 274 241 281 296 258 1,591
St. Louis St Louis City 71 57 40 55 48 49 320
St Louis County 77 82 89 105 117 116 586
* Region Total * 148 139 129 160 165 165 906
Other Icama 5 1 1 2 1 0 10
* Region Total * 5 1 1 2 1 0 10
State Total 1,316 1,536 1,602 1,748 1,826 1,652 9,680
79Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
During June 2020
Total Entries Total Re Entries
13,000
13,200
13,400
13,600
13,800
14,000
14,200
14,400
14,600
14,800
15,000
Jun
-18
Jul-
18
Au
g-1
8
Sep
-18
Oct
-18
No
v-1
8
De
c-1
8
Jan
-19
Feb
-19
Mar
-19
Ap
r-1
9
May
-19
Jun
-19
Jul-
19
Au
g-1
9
Sep
-19
Oct
-19
No
v-1
9
De
c-1
9
Jan
-20
Feb
-20
Mar
-20
Ap
r-2
0
May
-20
Jun
-20
Figure 17.
Children Active in Children's Division Custody
on the Last day of the MonthJune 2018 Through June 2020
80Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 18.
Children Closing from Alternative Care During June 2020
by Reason for Case Closing and Region
Returned Home Other
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Jun
-18
Jul-
18
Au
g-1
8
Sep
-18
Oct
-18
No
v-1
8
De
c-1
8
Jan
-19
Feb
-19
Mar
-19
Ap
r-1
9
May
-19
Jun
-19
Jul-
19
Au
g-1
9
Sep
-19
Oct
-19
No
v-1
9
De
c-1
9
Jan
-20
Feb
-20
Mar
-20
Ap
r-2
0
May
-20
Jun
-20
Figure 19.
Adoptions Finalized by Month
June 2018 Through June 2020
81Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +
Figure 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody as of June 2020
by Age and Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Jun
-16
Au
g-1
6
Oct
-16
De
c-1
6
Feb
-17
Ap
r-1
7
Jun
-17
Au
g-1
7
Oct
-17
De
c-1
7
Feb
-18
Ap
r-1
8
Jun
-18
Au
g-1
8
Oct
-18
De
c-1
8
Feb
-19
Ap
r-1
9
Jun
-19
Au
g-1
9
Oct
-19
De
c-1
9
Feb
-20
Ap
r-2
0
Jun
-20
Figure 21.
Children in Children's Division Custody
as of the Last Day of the MonthJune 2016 Through June 2020 by Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home
82Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
20
15
-3
20
15
-4
20
16
-1
20
16
-2
20
16
-3
20
16
-4
20
17
-1
20
17
-2
20
17
-3
20
17
-4
20
18
-1
20
18
-2
20
18
-3
20
18
-4
20
19
-1
20
19
-2
20
19
-3
20
19
-4
20
20
-1
20
20
-2
Exit
s p
er
10
0 C
hild
ren
inFo
ste
r C
are
Po
pu
lati
on
Figure 22.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody
by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition3rd Quarter 2015 Through 2nd Quarter 2020
Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status Relative Home Other Closing Return Home
83Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 84 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures
Table 14.
• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH
Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 15.
• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home Placements.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH
Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 16.
• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.
Table 17. and Table 18.
• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the
month. Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.
Table 19.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
Children’s Services Management Report 85 Research and Data Analysis
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP
Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG
Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May
19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 20.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Placement Types are:
ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other)
ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent
CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention
FAH Foster Adoptive Home
FGB Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FGH Foster Family Group Home
FGM Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home
FHE Emergency Foster Home
FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home
ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home
KHB Kinship Behavioral Home
KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home
KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy
MMD Medical Facility MMF Mental Health Facility
MMH Mental Health Home
MMW Mental Health Medicaid Waiver RFA Residential Treatment Facility
RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2
RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3
RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency
RFH Residential Foster Home RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant
RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare
RHB Behavioral Relative Home
RHM Medical Relative Home
Children’s Services Management Report 86 Research and Data Analysis
Table 20 (contd).
RHO Relative Home
RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway
SCH School
TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group
TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site
Table 21.
• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP
Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Table 22.
Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.
• Closing categories include the following closing reasons:
Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to sending state)
Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative)
Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency
Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship and Other
Table 23.
• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative
and/or legal father).
• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been
completed (TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).
• Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal
Status 5.
• No Identified Adoptive Resource includes Legal Status 1 children with a Goal of 'AD' and no
pre-adoptive placement marked.
Children’s Services Management Report 87 Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, FH, LA, RH, and KH.
• Existing vendor types RH and KH were added to this table in October 2015 and are shown
under the heading Relative Home.
• Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have
either no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago.
• The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago” represent unduplicated vendor counts.
Table 25.
• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody)
LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents
LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency
LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care)
LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship
LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement
Table 26.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Goals are: 01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s)
AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child
06 - Child Independence/Independent Living
07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives
09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing
Table 27.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of
placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1.
• The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors.
• Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous
vendor.
Children’s Services Management Report 88 Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children
are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 18.
• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s)
Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated,
Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.
Figure 19.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children
are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal
Status 5.
Figure 20.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH
Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP
Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG
Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Figure 21.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH
Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Intensive In-Home Services
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Lafayette 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 14 87.50% 2 12.50% 16
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Audrain 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Boone 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clark 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cole 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Franklin 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Lincoln 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Warren 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 1 3.33% 19 63.33% 10 33.33% 30
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 100.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 1 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
for Screening
Referrals Accepted
Accepted
Referrals
Accepted
Referrals Not
90
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jefferson 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Pulaski 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Reynolds 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Stoddard 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wayne 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 1 3.23% 20 64.52% 10 32.26% 31
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Camden 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 0 0.00% 4 36.36% 7 63.64% 11
Henry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 8 72.73% 3 27.27% 11
Laclede 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Lawrence 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
McDonald 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Miller 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Taney 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
* Region Total * 1 1.85% 33 61.11% 20 37.04% 54
Kansas City Jackson 6 33.33% 12 66.67% 0 0.00% 18
* Region Total * 6 33.33% 12 66.67% 0 0.00% 18
St. Louis St Louis City 2 18.18% 5 45.45% 4 36.36% 11
St Louis County 3 17.65% 8 47.06% 6 35.29% 17
* Region Total * 5 17.86% 13 46.43% 10 35.71% 28
State Total 14 7.91% 111 62.71% 52 29.38% 177
Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not
for Screening Accepted Accepted
91
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # At-Risk Average # At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Buchanan 2 3 1.50 3 1.50
Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cass 2 4 2.00 4 2.00
Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Clay 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Clinton 1 3 3.00 1 1.00
Cooper 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Harrison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Johnson 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Lafayette 1 5 5.00 1 1.00
Linn 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Livingston 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pettis 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Platte 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Putnam 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Saline 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Sullivan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
* Region Total * 11 22 2.00 16 1.45
Northeast Adair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Audrain 3 6 2.00 5 1.67
Boone 3 10 3.33 7 2.33
Callaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Clark 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Cole 2 7 3.50 6 3.00
Franklin 2 3 1.50 2 1.00
Gasconade 1 4 4.00 1 1.00
Howard 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Knox 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Lewis 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Lincoln 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Macon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Marion 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Monroe 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Montgomery 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Osage 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pike 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Randolph 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Schuyler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Charles 4 11 2.75 10 2.50
Warren 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
* Region Total * 20 52 2.60 40 2.00
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Butler 3 15 5.00 9 3.00
Cape Girardeau 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
92
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # of At-Risk Average # of At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dent 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dunklin 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Howell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Iron 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Jefferson 4 14 3.50 10 2.50
Madison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
New Madrid 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pemiscot 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Perry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Phelps 2 4 2.00 3 1.50
Pulaski 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Reynolds 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Ripley 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Scott 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Francois 2 5 2.50 3 1.50
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Stoddard 3 9 3.00 9 3.00
Texas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Washington 2 3 1.50 2 1.00
Wayne 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
* Region Total * 21 57 2.71 42 2.00
Southwest Barry 1 4 4.00 1 1.00
Barton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Bates 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Benton 2 2 1.00 2 1.00
Camden 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Cedar 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Christian 1 7 7.00 1 1.00
Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dallas 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Douglas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Greene 3 5 1.67 5 1.67
Henry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Jasper 7 12 1.71 12 1.71
Laclede 3 7 2.33 7 2.33
Lawrence 2 7 3.50 3 1.50
McDonald 2 8 4.00 4 2.00
Miller 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Moniteau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Newton 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Ozark 1 5 5.00 5 5.00
Polk 1 3 3.00 1 1.00
St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Stone 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Taney 2 3 1.50 3 1.50
Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Webster 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Wright 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
* Region Total * 29 71 2.45 51 1.76
Kansas City Jackson 12 20 1.67 19 1.58
* Region Total * 12 20 1.67 19 1.58
St. Louis St Louis City 6 16 2.67 12 2.00
St Louis County 12 27 2.25 21 1.75
* Region Total * 18 43 2.39 33 1.83
State Total 111 265 2.39 201 1.81
93
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Audrain 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Boone 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Callaway 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
Franklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Macon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Warren 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 17 80.95% 3 14.29% 1 4.76% 21
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Family Intact Family Not Intact Other
94Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Southwest Barry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cedar 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Christian 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Laclede 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lawrence 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 17 73.91% 4 17.39% 2 8.70% 23
Kansas City Jackson 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
* Region Total * 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
St. Louis St Louis City 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6
St Louis County 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
* Region Total * 8 66.67% 4 33.33% 0 0.00% 12
State Total 62 79.49% 13 16.67% 3 3.85% 78
Family Not Intact Family Intact Other
95Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During December 2019
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clinton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Boone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Callaway 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Randolph 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 7 53.85% 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 13
Southeast Bollinger 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Butler 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
96Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During December 2019
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cedar 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dallas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Laclede 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
* Region Total * 13 76.47% 3 17.65% 1 5.88% 17
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
State Total 32 71.11% 12 26.67% 1 2.22% 45
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
97Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During June 2019
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
98Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During June 2019
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Laclede 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
State Total 7 58.33% 4 33.33% 1 8.33% 12
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
99Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 100 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables
Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.
• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question
and an exit status which is not missing.
• Exit status includes the following status codes:
Family Intact
10 Family Intact
Family Not Intact
12 Child Ran Away 13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed)
14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered) 15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered)
16 In Foster Home or Group Home
17 In Residential 18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services)
19 In Juvenile Justice 20 In In-Patient Psychiatric
Other
11 Can't Locate Family
21 Information Not Available 99 Other
Table 32. and Table 33.
Tables include only those families which responded to follow-up requests. These do not
equal the numbers for Table 31. for the corresponding table six or twelve months prior.
top related