2009/2010 dstp/ayp review

2009/2010 DSTP/AYP Review

DSTP and AYP Review

• Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends

• AYP Status for Appoquinimink Schools

• Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus

2010 DSTP Results

Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends

• Graphs indicate percentage that meets or exceeds the standard in math and reading for grades 3,5,8, and 10.

• Two lines, one indicating Appoquinimink’s percentage of students who meet or exceed the standard, the other indicates the State of Delaware’s.

3rd Grade Reading DSTP

5th Grade Reading DSTP

8th Grade Reading DSTP

10th Grade Reading DSTP

Grade by Grade Reading Rankings (% Meets)

Reading    

Grade Rank Districts Above Appo

2 5 CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest

3 7 CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Woodbridge

4 3 IR, Milford

5 4 IR, Milford, Smyrna

6 5 CR, Cape, IR, Milford

7 3 IR, Milford

8 1  

9 5 IR, Milford, Polytech, Sussex Tech

10 3 Polytech, Sussex Tech

3rd Grade Math DSTP

5th Grade Math DSTP

8th Grade Math DSTP

10th Grade Math DSTP

Grade by Grade Math Rankings (% Meets)

Math    

Grade Rank Districts Above Appo

2 7 Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Smyrna, Woodbridge

3 8 CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Smyrna, Woodbridge

4 4 CR, IR, Milford

5 5 CR, IR, Milford

6 2 Milford

7 1  

8 1  

9 4 Delmar, Polytech, Sussex Tech

10 4 Polytech, Red Clay, Sussex Tech

Context is Important: 2009/2010 was a Unique Year

• Reading Accommodation Changes• Shorter Instructional Window due to

Unusual Winter Weather (one and a half weeks lost)

• Professional Development Days Eliminated• New Reading Curriculum for Grades 1-6• Higher Percentage of Low Income Students

Percentage of Low Income Students

Relationship between Poverty and DSTP Pass Rates

2010 AYP Determinations

2 Key Factors Impacting AYP

• Rising Performance Standards

• Cell Counts

Rising Performance Standards

75%

84%

School Performance

Rising Performance Standards

SuperiorAcademic

Review

Cell Counts

School “A”

% Meeting the

Standard

2010 Goal

All Students 85% 80%

White 85% 80%

Black 86% 80%

Special Education 77% 80%

Low Income 81% 80%

School “B”

% Meeting

the Standar

d

2010 Goal

All Students 85% 80%

White 85% 80%

Black 86% 80%

Special Education 45% 80%

Low Income 75% 80%

Which School Missed AYP?

MUST HAVE >40 STUDENTS TO COUNT

School “A”

% Meeting the

Standard

Number of

students

Result?

All Students

85% 400 GOOD

White 85% 240 GOOD

Black 86% 150 GOOD

Special Educatio

n77% 100 MISS

Low Income

81% 100 GOOD

School “B”

% Meeting the

Standard

Number of

students

Result?

All Students

85% 200 GOOD

White 85% 100 GOOD

Black 86% 50 GOOD

Special Educatio

n45% 25

DOES NOT

COUNT

Low Income

75% 38DOES NOT

COUNT

Statewide AYP-Meeting Schools by Type

Type # Meeting Total Percent

Elementary Schools 54 91 59%

Middle Schools 3 31 10%

High Schools 3 30 10%

School/Program Evaluation

Demographics

(Enrollment; Attendance; Grad.

Rate; Ethnicity; Gender; College

Attendance)Percepti

ons(Values, Beliefs,

Attitudes Regarding

the Learning Environm

ent)

School Process

es(Descripti

ons of School

Programs)

MHS: Commendable

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian N/A N/A

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. N/A N/A

LowIncome N/A N/A

AHS: Academic Review

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Below Below

Asian N/A N/A

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. N/A N/A

LowIncome N/A N/A

AGW: Superior

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian Meets Meets

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. Meets Meets

LowIncome Meets Meets

MMS: Academic Progress

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian N/A N/A

Hispanic Meets Meets

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. Below Below

LowIncome Meets Meets

RMS: Academic Progress

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian Meets Meets

Hispanic Meets Meets

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. Below Below

LowIncome Meets Meets

BHE: Superior

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian N/A N/A

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. N/A N/A

LowIncome Meets Meets

BME: Superior

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian N/A N/A

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. N/A N/A

LowIncome Meets Meets

CLE: Superior

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian N/A N/A

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. N/A N/A

LowIncome Meets Meets

OBL: Superior

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian Meets Meets

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. N/A N/A

LowIncome Meets Meets

SLE: Academic Watch

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Below Meets

Asian N/A N/A

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. N/A N/A

LowIncome Meets Meets

TES: Superior

SubgroupReading Result

Math Result

All Meets Meets

Nat. Amer. N/A N/A

Af. Amer. Meets Meets

Asian N/A N/A

Hispanic N/A N/A

White Meets Meets

ELL N/A N/A

Spec. Ed. N/A N/A

LowIncome Meets Meets

Percentage Low Income by Appo School

2010 Key Areas of Focus

Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus

• New Student Performance

• Elementary Special Education Performance

• High Performing Students

The Scope of the Number of New Students Entering

• For the 2010 DSTP testing session, 6363 students were tested.

• 661 were not enrolled in Appoquinimink School District last year.

• That’s roughly 1 in 10 students new to the District, or about 2 or 3 per class.

New Student Reading Performance

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Reading % Meets the Standard for New and Estab-lished Students

New to AppoAttended Appo last Year

Grade

% M

ee

ts

New Student Math Performance

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Math% Meets the Standard for New and Established Students

New to AppoAttended Appo last Year

Grade

% M

ee

ts

Special Education Percentage that Meets the Standard

Reading Appo % Meets State % Meets

Elementary 30% 42%

Middle 39% 33%

High 37% 21%

All 35% 34%

Math Appo % Meets State % Meets

Elementary 31% 44%

Middle 35% 27%

High 32% 17%

All 33% 31%

Reading National Percentile Ranks Spring 2010 from MAP Assessment

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 1000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Histogram

Normal Fit(Mean=59.5, SD=27.4)

Read %tile Spring

Fre

qu

en

cy

Math National Percentile Ranks Spring 2010 (from MAP Assessment)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 1000

100

200

300

400

500

600

Histogram

Normal Fit(Mean=54.6, SD=26.6)

Math %tile Spring

Fre

qu

en

cy

Thank You