1 dara bass, ksba director of policy servicesjodie zeller, kde integrated design team
Post on 19-Jan-2016
222 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
All policies of the Board are binding on employees of the District. . .
Employees who fail to comply with Board policies may be subject to disciplinary action.
3
Supervisors shall :Endeavor to establish an atmosphere of cooperation and professional courtesy.Direct employees under their supervision in keeping with Board policies, administrative procedures and other legal requirements.Assist employees in solving problems that arise in the workplace in a timely and supportive manner. Monitor employee performance to document training needs and share this information with the Superintendent/designee.
4
Any employee who participates in or encourages activities that disrupt the educational process, whether on school property or at school-sponsored events and activities, may be subject to disciplinary action . . . including conduct that:Threatens the health, safety, or welfare of others;May damage public or private property, including the property of students or staff;Is an illegal activity;Interferes with a student's access to educational opportunities or programs, including ability to attend, participate in, and benefit from instructional and extracurricular activities; orDisrupts delivery of instructional services or interferes with the orderly administration of the school / school-related activities /operations.
5
All employees are expected to use sound judgment in the performance of their duties and to take reasonable measures to protect the health, safety, and well-being of others, as well as District property.
6
Development of SystemThe Superintendent shall recommend for approval of the Board and the Kentucky Department of Education an evaluation system, developed by an evaluation committee, for all certified employees below the level of District Superintendent, which is in compliance with applicable statute and regulation.(KRS 156.557, 704 KAR 3:345)
7
8
PurposesThe purposes of the evaluation system shall be to:•improve instruction,•provide a measure of performance accountability to citizens,•foster professional growth, and•support individual personnel decisions.
9
10
11
12
13
Only 1-2 classes per year (minor % of performance)Classroom responsibilities onlyInsufficient emphasis on formative evaluation and resulting assistance provided Subject to evaluator biasFocus on process versus outcomesInspector model
Source: James H. Stronge, 2011
14
15
16
17
October, 2011 Defining Multiple Measures Content Validity Process Selection Criteria for Teachers in the Field Test MET Tools
November, 2011 Content Validity results reported to steering
committees Volunteer district training Tool developed and framework alignment to
support defined multiple measures Teacher & Leader Effectiveness components
recommended by steering committees Inter-rater Reliability training (MET videos & tools)
17
18
December, 2011 Inter-rater reliability training continuedField test training developed
January, 2012Field test training implementedFinal preparation for field test
February – April, 2012Field testing with volunteer districtsField test process evaluation
May, 2012Field test evaluation report Identify needs for Fall 2012 pilot
implementation June/July, 2012
Correlation studies with multiple measures
June KBE Meeting
Approve regulation for
evaluation system
18
19
20
Which teacher Which teacher a a student happens to get student happens to get within a school within a school matters matters more more than which school than which school the student happens to the student happens to
attend.attend.
Source: Nye, Konstantopoulos, & Hedges, 2004
Change how teachers and principals are evaluated.Change how they are supported to:Continuously improve their professional practice;Enhance their effectiveness; andDrive increasingly high levels of student achievement.
21
22
Implications?
Re-examine the purpose and focus of the formative phase.
During the post-formative conference, evaluator should work with employee to clarify expectations:What is to occur during the year –
including planning and systematic collection of data.
What the supervisor will look for during the subsequent observations.
23
24
DOMAIN STANDARD PERFORMANCE LEVELS
KY TEACHER STANDARDS/
ISLLC (PRINCIPAL)
EVIDENCE &ARTIFACTS
DESCRIPTORS
25
Multiple-measures of teacher/ principal evaluation, including student growth, will be part of the future of K-12 education.
Implications?26
27
28
Videos Lesson/Unit PlansStudent Work ProductsLearning Logs
Video/Audio Tapes Office Referral DataStudent FeedbackAttendance DataParent Communication
Mentoring/Coaching PD Logs SBDM Committee
Work PD Presentations
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
“We’ve never had a meaningful evaluation system that identifies the dimensions of great teachers so we can transfer the skills to others.”Key predictors of how much kids will learn:Does the teacher use class time well?When students are confused, does the teacher help get them straightened out?
36
37
top related