america's forsaken promise
Post on 24-Oct-2014
Embed Size (px)
AMERICAS FORSAKEN PROMISE by Tinsley Grey Sammons
AMERICAS FORSAKEN PROMISE is the intellectual property of Tinsley Grey Sammons (1936 ). email: bastlaw@ yahoo.com Tinsley Grey Sammons 13519 Chase St. Gonzales, LA 70737
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Tinsley Grey Sammons, 1936 is a self-educated Geezer with an abiding passion for liberty and justice. He served as an enlisted man in the Naval Reserve, the Coast Guard, and the Air Force during the Cold War and later retired from his automobile service and repair business in 1998. He describes himself as a very angry, blue-collarto-the-marrow unapologetic curmudgeon. It has allegedly been said by drunken sailors, prostitutes, and at least one muleskinner that his ability to meld the vilest profanity with impressive scholarly opinion punctuated by irreverent flatulence is unsurpassed. Perhaps regrettably, readers of this collection will be spared what is surely some of the most colorful and passionately sincere profanity imaginable. Following a rather harrowing yearlong readjustment after the destruction of our home in St. Bernard Parish by Hurricane Katrina in 2005 we settled comfortably in Gonzales Louisiana. I have intimately shared my life with this interestingly complex man since the mid-1970s. Kathleen Thriffiley Sammons MY FERVENT HOPE The studies, analyses and opinions compiled in this work were developed and edited many times in the years since 1992. When I was finally able to proofread the entire work without making any changes I knew that against all odds I had to offer my conclusions to my fellow Citizens. Hopefully my nagging conclusions will eventually play at least a small part in the salvaging of the American Ideal so eloquently expressed by Thomas Jefferson in 1776. I fervently hope that my laboriously-arrived-at-conclusions will somehow seep through the powerful Establishment Curtain and assist those who read them in disabusing themselves of the mind-numbing effect of the structured misinformation, half-truths, deception and bald-faced lies produced by their own government and disseminated by an unpardonably lapdog media. WE hold these Truths Tinsley Grey Sammons Gonzales, Louisiana November 2011 3
ACETAMINOPHEN (Real Drug-related Crime) So-called drug-related crime is in reality prohibition-related crime. Absent prohibition and the prohibition inflated cost of doing illicit business, those now trafficking wouldnt bother with trying to compete with your local drugstore for customer satisfaction. It is in the best interest of the long suffering, statute-plagued American People to become aware of who the real criminals are in the so-called War on Drugs. De facto Drug Prohibition is the Alpha Precedent that continues to nullify Constitutional Restraint and pave the way for the States utter domination of the Individual. Deception and Dollars It is in the immediate financial interest of the statists to continue with the present institutionalized deception as its operatives seek new ways to Plunder by Law. Read on to discover just how criminally low the statist parasites will go: HYDROCODONE The purpose of the non-controlled drugs in combination is often twofold: 1) To provide increased analgesia via drug synergy. 2) To limit the intake of hydrocodone by causing unpleasant and often unsafe side effects at higher-than-prescribed doses. Wikipedia ACETAMINOPHEN (TYLENOL). . . acute overdoses of paracetamol can cause potentially fatal liver damage and, in rare individuals, a normal dose can do the same; the risk is heightened by alcohol consumption. Paracetamol toxicity is the foremost cause of acute liver failure in the Western world, and accounts for most drug overdoses in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand Wikipedia Opioids are effective analgesics that need no mixing with other substances to control pain. Contaminating an opioid with Tylenol is a potential violence committed against persons seeking relief from pain. It is in fact intrinsically criminal and those responsible should be brought to justice. Capitalizing on state and media generated opiophobia to justify its unlawful interference in the lawful practice of medicine, unnecessary government inspired meddling in pain control is morally equivalent to inflicting the suffering. Interfering with an innocent Individuals unalienable right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness is a fundamentally criminal act. 4
How can an Individual possibly pursue Happiness when he is denied or simply cannot afford the cost involved in acquiring written permission to purchase the means to relieve his pain? Even worse, how can he pursue Happiness when he is experiencing the consequences of having been systematically poisoned. As the consequences of the Drug War accumulate consequences that include imprisonment and in some cases, collateral damage that includes the death of innocents the War on Drugs surely has standing as an ongoing crime against humanity that merits a reaction based on the powerful Precedent set by the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials. (There was also a lesser known but perhaps more interesting Trial of the Judges* that immediately followed the War Crimes Trials.)*The movie Judgment at Nuremberg is a keeper and well worth studying.
A LEGAL OUTRAGE (Who are the REAL Criminals in This Endless Drama?) To control a particular pain that I will likely have for the remainder of my life, I am required by law to get permission from a licensed physician. In America today, doctors are virtually Agents of the State. In addition to my personal inconvenience, each quarterly thirty mile round trip visit involves testing and recording my blood pressure and pulse, both of which I can easily do at home for $0.00 at my convenience. But no visit, no prescription. No prescription, no pain relief. Chronic pain sufferers are probably familiar with that cute little Smiley Card displaying the facial expressions that are professional medicines best effort to actually measure the intensity of a sufferers pain. Not wanting to appear drug greedy or looking as though I wished to merely experience a chemically induced feelgood, I always absentmindedly point to the moderately unhappy face in the middle. Each quarterly visit costs about $260.00. THATS TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTY DOLLARS folks. Blue Cross pays all but $40.00 and Medicare pays the remainder. . . . And of course my wife and I pay Blue Cross . . . PLENTY! Is it any wonder that medical professionals wont join freedom lovers in an effort to repeal de facto Drug Prohibition? Yet isnt forcibly withholding the means to relieve suffering morally equivalent to inflicting the suffering. And is that not intrinsically criminal? 5
So then, for me to comply with the Draconian law, $1200 a year must be paid for permission to purchase a few bucks worth of needlessly acetaminophen-contaminated pain relief. Why are WE the People so unnecessarily fearful, and so unpardonably gullible? Surely we cannot all be that stupid. Are WE the People ever going to demand an end to this insane legal extortion? Hey my fellow Taxpayers, can you hear me . . . or do you need one of those NCIS attention getters that Special Agent Jethro Gibbs occasionally administers to his underlings? Or perhaps you need something much more violent to shock you out of your psychological torpor. Like a trip to jail for committing a non crime and the legal extortion of a considerable sum of your hard earned dollars.
ACQUIESCING IN UNLAWFUL POWER (*shrug* Well, its the law.) *shrug* Well, its the law. How many times have I heard that stupid expression of hopeless resignation when, to comfortably acquiesce in all laws it would be necessary for a person to assume that there are no bad ones. Why does a homo sapiens acquiesce in laws that stifle his very nature? Bad law should not be merely avoided thereby leaving the unwary and unlucky to be legally rendered by an insatiable faction made up of legal parasites it should be openly defied by more citizens than can possibly be arrested, jailed, impoverished or otherwise ruined by the unlawful Legal System that has supplanted the genuine Law of the Land. Know the Often Crucial Difference Lawful and legal are not synonyms. There is an ethical element in lawful that is often painfully absent from things that are legal. Encroaching Tyranny Unmistakable signs of legal tyranny have been increasingly visible in America for more than ninety years. For an opener, consider the Eighteenth Amendment along with lawyer Harrison's infamous Act1.1. Harrison Narcotics Tax Act 12/14/1914
Principles routinely Contravened Beginning with Power that obviously contravenes Unalienable Rights, all laws that are repugnant to the July 1776 Action of the Second Continental Congress should be systematically eliminated. Laws that are expected to be the most difficult to eliminate should be eliminated first. The non-amendable July 1776 Action of the Second Continental Congress clearly establishes the philosophical, i.e., lawful, limits to Governments Power to interfere with the peaceful exercise of the Individuals Rights. In the light of the Principles that inspired the Unanimous Declaration, Americans today have greater lawful cause for rebellion than did the Colonists in 1776. WE hold these Truths . . .
A PHILOSOPHICAL LITMUS TEST Where do you stand on Drug Prohibition? This simple, straightforward question quickly eliminates the half-hearted, the hopelessly ill-informed, and the Stealth Statists. Simple is best, so keep it simple by insisting upon an across the board repeal of de facto Drug Prohibition. Interfering with an adults efforts to relieve his personal suffering is morally equivalent to inflicting the suffering. Deliberately inflicting suffering is intrinsically criminal. The insane and intrinsically criminal Drug War has brought dreadful suffering to millio