akiyoshi matsumurai) and morihiko okada2)
TRANSCRIPT
J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon 98(4): 451-470 (1990)
Effects of Erect Bipedal Standing on the
Cross-sectional Geometry of the Rat Femur
Akiyoshi MATSUMURAI) and Morihiko OKADA2)
1) Department of Biology, National Defense Medical College 2) Institute of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba
Abstract Effects of erect bipedal standing exercise on the skeletal morphology were
investigated in seventeen growing male rats divided into control and exercise group.
Using the newly devised 'bipedal training box', in which rats achieved a fully upright
stance through positively reinforced operant conditioning, the exercise group was
burdened with the bipedal standing exercise from 64 days to 140 days of age, totally
in 136-138 sessions. At the age of 140 days, the left femur was dissected out, ten
serial cross sections of the femoral diaphysis were cut from proximal to distal and
cross-sectional properties were calculated from the photographs of the sections. The
bipedal standing exercise had the following effects on the femoral diaphysis; an
increase in the cross-sectional area, area moments of inertia in the proximal half of
the shaft, i.e. the strength of the femoral diaphysis increased against axial compressive,
antero-posterior bending and medio-lateral bending, respectively; an increase in the
polar moment of inertia and an external rotation of the principal axis in the vicinity of mid-shaft, i.e. the strength against the torsional load increased and the direction
to resist the maximum bending load more or less approached the antero-posterior
direction. These observations were discussed in comparison with the effects of
quadrupedal running exercise on the femoral cross section previously observed by us.
Keywords Rat, Bipedal standing exercise, Femur, Cross-sectional properties
Introduction
If morphology of a bone is closely related to
the external forces and produced by remodeling
the compact bone under the rule of WOLFF's
Law (WOLFF, 1870, 1892; cited from ROESLER,
1987), existence of a certain bone forms that
correspond to the mode of exercise or locomotion
is expected. To understand how human lower
limb bones adapt to the bipedal walking,
therefore, studies on the relationships between the mechanical environment and the morphology of
hind limb bones is considered to be relevant.
From this viewpoint, analyses have been made
on the relationships between the cross-sectional
geometry of human or primate lower limb bones and external stress factors such as muscle con-
tractions or joint reaction forces induced by their
locomotor behavior (KIMURA,1971; RYBICKI et
a!.,1972; LOVEJOY et al., 1976; MARTIN and
Article No. 9021 Received July 14, 1990
452 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
ATKINSON, 1977; LOVEJOY and TRINKAUS,
1980; PIZIALI et al., 1980; BURR et al., 1981,
1982; TAKAHASHI, 1982a; RUFF and HAYES,
1983). Some investigators have burdened an
actual dynamic exercise on the quadrupedal
animals and attempted to observe the change
in cross-sectional morphology of limb
bones (LANYON et al., 1982; MATSUMURA et
al., 1983; MATSUMURA and OKADA, 1987). To
investigate the effects of bipedalism, however, it
will be useful to burden the experimental animals
with a static as well as dynamic mode of exercise
as occuring in the human bipedal posture, and
to compare the effects of the different modes of
exercises on the bone. When any morphological features are found in the bone corresponding to
certain mode of exercise, relationships will
become clearer between the bone shape and the
external forces acting on the bone, and, in turn,
the locomotor behavior causing them. In the previous studies, as an experimental
animal model for bipedal walking and upright
posture, the rat forelimb-amputated at their early neonatal stage, designated as 'bipedal rat', has
been extensively used (COLTON,1929; GOFF and
LANDMESSER, 1957). The other bipedal model
is the rat forcibly placed in an upright cylinder
and cared for a long time (JINNAKA, 1929;
RIESENFELD, 1966). Many investigators have
used these animal models for examining the
effects of bipedal behavior on the morphology
or strength of hindlimb and vertebral bones
(COLTON, 1929; JINNAKA, 1929; GOFF and LANDMESSER, 1957; SAKAMOTO, 1959;
USHIKUBO, 1959; SAVILL and SMITH, 1966;
KAY and CONDON, 1987; CASSIDY et al., 1988).
Though a few of the cross-sectional properties
have been examined in the femur shaft of the
'bipedal rat' or the rat placed in an upright cylinder (RIESENFELD, 1966; SMITH and
SAVILLE, 1966), the number of studies concerned with the cross-sectional morphology of the
hindlimb bone is scarce. Further, the hindlimb
bone alignment as revealed by X-ray photographs during the bipedal posture (USHIKUBO, 1959;
RIESENFELD, 1966) and measurements of the
duration in which an upright posture was main-
tained (MORAVEC and CLEALL, 1987) suggest
that hindlimbs in these bipedal animals are not
sufficiently loaded by the bipedal standing (KAY and CONDON, 1987). These bipedal animals also
have a handicap because they are physically
injured or constrained, and the stresses given on
the animals are much severer than in the control
animals.
In the present experiment, using the newly
developed 'bipedal training box' (MATSUMURA,
1986), we burdened the normal rats with erect
bipedal standing exercise by means of positively
reinforced operant conditioning. The animals
were loaded under the strictly controlled experi-
mental condition, and morphological changes of
the cross-sections along the femoral diaphysis
were examined.
Materials and Methods
Animals and rearing condition
Seventeen male Sprague-Dawley rats (21 days
old), weighing 45-54 g (Jcl:SD, CLEA JAPAN
Inc.) were divided into control group of 8 and
exercise group of 9 and each animal was housed
separately in a plastic cage of 275 (w) x 165 (d) x 130 (h) mm. The animals were reared under
14-10 LD cycles (the light was on from 5:00 am
to 7:00 pm) and room temperature was controlled
to keep 22 ± 2*. From 21 days till 27 days of
age, the rats were freely fed solid food MF
(ORIENTAL YEAST Co.: Calcium 11.0 g/kg; Phosphorus 8.3 g/kg; Ca:P ratio 1:0.75). From
28 days of age, both groups were routinely fed
the food twice a day (75 min. between
8:00-10:30 am and 75 mini between 7:00-10:00
pm). The total feeding time a day was 150 minutes.
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 453
Apparatus for exercise
The apparatus used in this study for exercise
was an experimental chamber, "bipedal training
box" (remodeled type of GT-8010 SKINNER'S
Box, O'HARA & Co. Ltd.), which had been
developed for burdening the small sized animals with erect bipedal standing exercise (MATSU-
MURA, 1986). In the apparatus, a food reward
(100 mg Precision Pellets of O'HARA & Co. Ltd. which is made of the MF, ORIENTAL
YEAST Co.) is given when a bipedal standing
animal pushes a high-positioned lever upward from beneath by the nose (Fig. 1).
Each box is 275(w) x 190(d) x 370(h) mm (300 mm high from the top to the floor) walled with
acrylfiber and alminium panels. One of the 190
mm panels of the box has a food tray approxi-
mately 20 mm above the floor. A stainless steel
lever, 35 mm wide, 12 mm long, and 1.2 mm thick is located on the right side of the panel.
When a rat pushes up the lever certain times
according to the fixed ratio (FR) schedule, a pellet
food is transferred to the food tray from the
pellet dispenser, which is controlled by FR Feed Unit CF-R5 (O'HARA & Co. Ltd.). Height of the
lever can be adjusted at every 10 mm from 40
mm to 290 mm high, to adapt to the animal size.
Weight of the lever can be regulated in a range
between 35 g and over 500 g by a spring in the
loading unit. Five experimental chambers were
connected to the FR Feed Unit for programming
the FR schedules.
Exercise program
After 31 days of age, the rats of the exercise
group were trained erect bipedal standing and
Fig. 1. The 'bipedal training box': A relatively statical load is
given to the hindlimb when a bipedal standing animal pushes
a lever upward from beneath by the nose to obtain a food reward.
Arrow: lever; PD: pellet dispenser; FT: food tray; FU: FR
feeding unit; LU: loading unit.
454 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
lever pushing by using the procedure of "shaping" (REYNOLDS, 1975). In the period between 31 days and 57 days of age, the shaping was performed during the night feeding time for
30 minutes a day for a rat, with an interval of 1-3 days. In this period, when a rat pushes up
lever once, one pellet food was obtained (FR 1).
Lever height was set at 100-120% of the tail
length and lever weight was initially set to 35 g.
The rats took 3-9 times of shaping to learn the
erect bipedal standing and lever pushing up
behavior. After learning the behavior, the rats
were trained for additional 5-19 sessions under
the same FR schedule till 63 days of age. From
64 days to 140 days of age, the rats of the exercise
group were seriously burdened with the erect bipedal standing exercise.
In the bipedal training, burdening condition was determined by four factors, i.e., 1) times of
response to get one pellet food for reinforcement,
2) total standing duration, 3) lever weight and 4)
lever height. The times of lever pushing response
to get one pellet was increased step by step; one
time (FR1) from 31 to 63 days of age, 5 times
(FR5) from 64 to 75 days of age and 10 times
(FR10) from 76 to 140 days of age (Fig. 2A). In FR1, 50-100 lever pushings were performed
within a session of 30-60 minutes. In FR5 and
FR10, 100-200 pushings occured in a session
(Fig. 2A) which took 5-30 minutes. During the exercise, continuous white noise was given to
mask any extraneous sound. After the training,
the rats were returned to the plastic cage and
freely fed till their total feeding time became 75 minutes.
Weight of the lever, 35-50 g during the
shaping, was increased step by step and finally reached 440 g (Fig. 2B). When increasing the
weight, a new weight was selected which all the
rats of the exercise group could push up
continuously.
The lever height was determined in relation to
the height at which the rats were able to touch
their nose from beneath and push up the lever.
During the experiment, the lever height was
increased step by step from 140 to 280 mm
according to the growth of animals. These heights
were 116-125% of the tail length after 64 days
of age (Figs. 2C, 8).
The rats of the exercise group were burdened
totally 136-138 sessions of the erect bipedal
standing exercise during the period from 64-140
days of age. No erect bipedal standing exercise
was imposed on the control rats.
Preservation of experimental materials At the age of 140 days, rats were sacrificed
under ether anesthesia. The left femur was
quickly removed and the fresh weight was weighed to 1/100 mg using a chemical balance
(SHIMADZU Co.) and the maximum length was measured to 1/20 mm with a micrometer. The
femur was air dried for seven days and the dry
weight was weighed and the maximum length was
measured in the same manner as the fresh
samples.
Photographing of femoral cross sections
For the purpose of strengthening the diaphysis
against cutting and of determining the reference
plane with respect to the diaphysis, the left femur was placed on a flat glass board and embedded in bone cement (ZIMMER Inc.) so that the ventral
(posterior) ends of three parts, i, e., medial condyle, lateral condyle and lesser trochanter, are
contained in a horizontal reference plane of the
glass board. Then the cross sections of the femur were cut perpendicularly to the bony long axis
and to the reference plane, along the diaphysis
from proximal to distal at 5% intervals, between
the point of 30% and 75% level of the total length
(Fig. 3). The proximal aspects of the cross section was photographed under an eyepiece micrometer
using a 55 mm lens (Micro Nikkor, NIKON Co.)
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 455
Fig. 2. Data of behavioral responses, growth curve, loading condition, and food intake. A: Mean number of lever
pushing for the exercise group per session. Periods of fixed ratio (FR) schedules are indicated. B: Mean growth curve of the body weight in each group and lever weight in the exercise group. C: Mean growth curve of the
tail length in each group and lever height in the exercise group. D: Mean food intake per rat per day in each
group. One g of the solid food MF corresponds to 3.599 Cal.
456 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
Fig. 3. Location of the examined cross sections along the femoral diaphysis and typical examples of the cross section (30%, 40%, 50%, 60% and 70% level) in each group.
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 457
and printed on the photographic paper
(Hishicopy CH, MITSUBISHI Co.) by 20 hold magnification.
Calculation of cross-sectional properties Geometrical properties of the femur cross
sections (ENDO and TAKAHASHI, 1982; TAKAHASHI, 1982b) were calculated from the
photographs with the aid of the digitizer
(KD4030A, GRAPHTEC Co.; possible reading range is up to 0.1 mm) and microcomputer
(PC-9801F, NEC). The program developed by TAKAHASHI and ADACHI (1982) was rearranged
and used in this study. The calculated properties
are as follows:
1) Area moment of inertia about the x axis:
Here, x and y are the distances measured in
the M-L and in the A-P directions, respectively,
from the centroid to the differentiated area (dA),
2) Area moment of inertia about the y axis:
3) Principal moment of inertia (maximum):
4) Principal moment of inertia (minimum):
5) Polar moment of inertia:
6) Circumference: C
7) Cross-sectional area (area of the compact
bone):
8) Inclination of the principal axis:
9) Section index:
For details about the measurement of the
cross-sectional properties of rat femur, see MATSUMURA, et al. (1983) and MATSUMURA
and OKADA (1987).
Results
Food intake
The amount of food intake during the experi-
mental period was 8,567 Cal in the control group
and 8,440 Cal in the exercise group. After 60 days
of age, each rat of the control group and the
exercise group ate in average 78.2 Cal and 78.0
Cal per day, respectively (Fig. 2D).
Observation of the bipedal standing posture and
behavior
The photographs in Fig. 4 show a cycle of the
lever pushing up behavior. A sitting rat started
to rise with the hindlimbs plantigrade, then the
hindlimbs gradually became digitigrade and the rat assumed a fully upright posture during the
lever pushing. When pushing up the lever in the
fully upright position, the rat touched the vertical
wall in front of his neck or face to balance
himself (Fig. 4: 4-7). When assuming this
posture, however, forelimbs of the rat appeared not loaded with significant forces.
During the loading period (64-140 days of
age), the number of standing times in each
exercise session in each rat was 17.7 in FR 5 and 12.8 in FR 10 in average (Fig. 2A). In preliminary
experiments using three rats different from those
examined in the present study, we observed that
in the schedule of FR 5 and FR 10, each rat of
the exercise group spent about 3.5 and 6 sec
respectively, in average, holding the erect bipedal
standing to obtain a pellet by lever pushing (Fig.
5). Hence, the total standing duration per exercise
session in the present study might be estimated
to be about 62 sec (FR 5) or 77 sec (FR 10). In
a rat performing 136 exercise sessions, then, total
bipedal standing duration might amount to 171
min through the experimental period (the dura-
458 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
Fig. 4. A cycle of bipedal standing and lever pushing behavior of a rat. The photographs flow from left to right.
An arrow head and a small arrow show the lever and food tray, respectively. In a schedule of FR 10, when the
rat has pushed the lever ten times, a pellet is given in the food tray.
tion including half rising becames 203 min).
Body weight and tail length
Growth curve of the body weight and that of
the tail length are shown in Figs. 2B and 2C,
respectively. In either value, there was no
statistically significant difference between the two
groups during the experimental period. The final values are compared in Table 1.
Weight and length of the femur
The weight and the maximum length of the
fresh and dry femur are shown in Table 1. In the
dry weight, the exercise group had a tendency to
show larger values compared to the control
group.
Cross-sectional properties
Results of the calculation of cross-sectional
properties are shown in Tables 2, 3 and Figs. 6, 7. The change of the values along the femoral
diaphysis from proximal to distal and the
differences between the two groups are as
follows.
1. Area moments of inertia (Ix. Iy) and principal
moments of inertia (I1, I2)
The moments of inertia were larger in the
distal and proximal portions. IX and Il marked
the smallest at around the central 50-60% level.
Mean values of the exercise group were higher
than those of the control group at all sections.
This tendency was more pronounced in the
proximal half (30-55% level) of the femur shaft
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 459
Fig. 5. Frequency and duration of the bipedal standing behavior recorded in a rat for 30 minutes under the schedule of FR 10. Time passes from left to right. Each row represents 3 minutes and the behavioral record
is serially presented from top to bottom for the 30 minutes. H: half rising position (photographs 2 and 3 in Fig. 4), F: fully upright position (photographs 4-7 in Fig. 4),
R: reinforcement by a pellet food.
in Ix and I2, and in the proximal half (30-55%
level) and distal sections (70-75% level) in I,
and II. The differences of the mean values
between the two groups were significant at 30%,
40% and 50% levels of the shaft for Ix, and at
30% and 45% levels for 12.
2. Polar moment of inertia (Ia)
Because the polar moment of inertia was
calculated as the sum of Ix and Iy or I1 and I2,
this parameter became larger at the distal and
proximal sections and the smallest in the center at 50-65% level. In all the sections, mean values
of the exercise group were larger than those of
the control group and this tendency was con-
spicuous in the proximal portion (30-55% level), difference between the groups being signifi-
cant at 50% level.
460 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
Table 1. Physical measurements compared between the groups
wt.: weight B.W.: body weight
3. Circumference (C)
Circumference was larger in the distal and
proximal sections and was the smallest at around the 50-65% level. In all the sections, mean
values of the exercise group were slightly larger
compared to that of the control group although no significant difference existed between the two
groups. 4. Cross-sectional area (A)
Cross-sectional area maximized at 30% level,
gradually decreasing to the minimum at 60-75% level. In all the sections, mean values
of the exercise group were larger than those of
the control group and this tendency was con-
spicuous in the proximal half of the femur shaft
with a significant difference at 30%, 40% and
50% levels.
5. Inclination of the principal axis (*p)
Inclination of the principal axis corresponds
to the direction of the maximum area moment
of inertia. Between 30% and 40% level, the in-
clination increased, i.e., the axis rotated clockwise
viewed from distal. Reaching the maximum at
40% level, the inclination reduced to the
minimum at 60% or 65% level, but increased
again from 70% to 75% level. The mean values
of the exercise group were larger than those of
the control group from 30% to 60% level, with
a significant difference at the 50% level. The rela-
tion of the two groups reversed between 60% and
65% level, and in the portion between 65% and
75% level; the mean value of the exercise group
became smaller than that of the control group.
6. Section index (SI) Section index minimized at 35% and 70%
levels and maximized at 50% level (Fig. 7). In all
the sections, there was no significant difference
between the exercise and the control group. At
30-35% and 55% levels, however, the exercise
group tended to surpass the control group, sug-
gesting a rounding effect on the cross-sectional
geometry. At 75% level, on the contrary, the exercise group showed a decreasing tendency,
suggesting a flattening effect in the medio-lateral
direction.
Discussion
Forelimb-amputated "bipedal rat" has been
frequently used as an experimental model for the
erect bipedal walking. In these cases, however,
the body weight of the bipedal rats was relatively
small compared to that of the controls
(SAKAMOTO, 1959; SAVILL and SMITH, 1966; MORAVEC and CLEALL, 1987). In the present
study, no statistically significant difference was
found between the bipedal standing group and
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 461
462 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
Fig. 6. Variation in area moment of inertia about x axis (Ix), area moment of inertia about y axis (Iy,), maximum principal moment of inertia (I 1), minimum principal moment of inertia (I2) and polar moment of inertia (Ip)
along the femoral diaphysis. At each cross section, statistical difference between the two groups is shown with an asterisk (p <0.05). Vertical bars represent standard deviation of means (± SD).
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 463
Fig. 7. Variation in circumference (C), cross-sectional area (A), inclination of the principal axis (*p) and section index (SI) along the femoral diaphysis. Other legends are the same as in Fig. 6 except two asterisks showing
the between-group difference at the 1% level of significance.
464 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
the control group in the body weight, tail length
and amount of food intake during the experi-
mental period. In view of the growth process, the
subject animals in our experiment are considered
to be suitable for examining the effects of bipedal standing exercise on the bone.
There are only a few studies on the cross-
sectional morphology of the femur in the bipedal
rat. USHIKUBO (1959) indicated that the medio-
lateral diameter in the distal portion of the femur
became larger in the forelimb-amputated rats
than in the controls and the results of our calcula-
tion using the published data of USHIKUBO's
male rats showed a statistically significant
difference between the two groups. SMITH and
SAVILL (1966) found that during the growth of
the rat, cross-sectional area of the femur between
the third trochanter and the condyles, which
seems to be equivalent to 50-75% levels in the
present experiment, increased faster in the forelimb-amputated than in the controls.
RIESENFELD (1966) showed that in rats forelimb-
amputated or reared in an upright cylinder, the index between the medio-lateral and antero-
posterior diameter taken at the mid-point of the femur shaft increased, i.e., the rounding effect
of the cross section occured.
In the above studies, however, the forelimb-
amputated rats usually assumed a half sitting
posture, tucking their hindlimbs under the body to hold a dorsal kyphotic stance (PRATT, 1943;
GOFF and LANDMESSER, 1957; USHIKUBO,
1959; YAMADA, 1962; MORAVEC and CLEALL,
1987). The X-ray photographs of the rat reared
in the upright cylinder also showed hindlimbs
seemingly tucked under the body (RIESENFELD,
1966). When the forelimb-amputated rat stood
with hindlimbs and maintained proper balance,
their posture was very similar to that of a man
lifting a heavy object (USHIKUBO, 1959;
YAMADA, 1962), i, e., they flexed slightly forward in the mid-thoracic region (CASSIDY et
a!.,1988). Also, the feet of the bipedal rats were
evidently farther apart than those of the controls
(COLTON, 1929). KAY and CONDON (1987) concluded that the
bipedal rats did not achieve true bipedalism, or they produced no increased hindlimb loading
because of the following reasons; 1) the result of
comparative analysis of the posture showed no
statistically significant difference in the amount of the time spent in the upright stance between
the bipedal and control groups (MORAVEC and
CLEALL,1987); 2) many past experiments on the
skeletal changes observed in the femur relied on
the indices or the ratios, not on the direct bone
measurements, to determine the differences
between the bipedal and control groups
(COLTON,1929; USHIKUBO,1959; SAKAMOTO, 1959; RIESENFELD, 1966); 3) in the direct bone
measurements, almost no significant difference
was found in the bony parameters of the
hindlimbs.
According to the direct measurements shown
in KAY and CONDON (1987), however, antero-
posterior diameter of the proximal femur is larger in the bipedal rats compared to the controls and
the difference is statistically significant, suggesting that hindlimb loading was actually
increased in the bipeds.
In view of the foregoing observations as well
as the three problems pointed out by KAY and
CONDON (1987), it seems more suitable to con-
clude that cross-sectional changes observed in the
femur of the bipedal rat mainly refrects the
habitual posture and locomotor behavior induced
by the amputation or forcible standing in the
cylinder rather than the effects of the load given
while the rat takes an upright stance. Our rats
burdened with the lever pushing up exercise didn't
show the peculiar postural habit as observed in
the bipedal rats, and showed a more stable and
constant erect bipedal standing posture during the
lever pushing behavior than in the bipedal rats.
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 465
Fig. 8. Lateral skeletal view of erect bipedal standing rat in the 'bipedal training box'. The two figures (A and B) were traced from X-ray photographs of the same animal. Lever height is set at 116% of the tail length in A and 125% in B. From 64 days to 140 days of age, the lever height for each rat was set approximately in the
range from 116% to 125%. In both A and B, the vertebral kyphosis is observed around Th 13 portion (an arrow head) and slight lordosis is noticed around L5 portion (double arrow heads). Arrow: femur, L: lever.
When a rat fully stood upright in the bipedal
training box, extension of the hip and knee joints
were remarkable (Fig. 8), and the vertebral
column had a tendency to show a kyphosis in the thoracic portion and a lordosis in the lumbar
portion. The stance of the feet in the erect bipedal standing rat is the same as when they are
crouching and eating food (Fig. 4). In the lever
pushing behavior, the height reached by the nose tip, the weight of the lever, and the times and
duration of the lever pushing could be exactly
recorded (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2C and 5). Since both
exercise and control groups were reared in the
cage 130 mm high which was lower than the
lowest set lever, only the experimental group
regularly practiced a certain amount of bipedal
standing during the exercise period.
In the present experiment, bipedal standing
exercise more or less increased the area moments
of inertia, polar moment of inertia, and cross-
466 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
sectional area along the femoral shaft. Con-
spicuous effects, however were noted in the
proximal 30%-50% levels. The increase in the cross-sectional area in this portion is considered to be an adaptation to the axial compressive load.
In the above portion, at the same time, the area
moment of inertia in the antero-posterior direc-
tion became larger in the exercise group than in
the control group. The area moment of inertia
in the medio-lateral direction also showed a
similar tendency. Thus, from the viewpoint of
structural strength, the resistance against both
antero-posterior and medio-lateral bending seems
to have increased in the middle and proximal
shaft of the femur due to the bipedal standing
exercise.
The polar moment of inertia increased in the
exercise group in the proximal half of the femur,
especially in the vicinity of the mid-shaft, sug-
gesting an increase in resistance against the tor-sional load. Further, also near the mid-shaft, the
principal direction of the cross section rotated and became close to the antero-posterior direc-
tion. These changes in the polar moment of
inertia and in the direction of the principal axis
in response to the bipedal standing and lever
pushing exercise suggest the possibility that tor-sions in the external direction were generated in
the middle of the shaft. The rotation of the
principal direction may also indicate an increased registance against the antero-posterior bending
load. Though no significant changes were found,
the section index of the exercise group tended to
become larger in the most proximal portion and
near the center of the shaft, suggesting a rounding
effect.
The authors previously examined the cross-
sectional properties of the femur shaft when the
rats were loaded with forced running exercise
(MATSUMURA and OKADA, 1987). The prop-erties varied with characteristic patterns along the femoral diaphysis from proximal to distal,
which are basically in agreement with those observed in the present experiment. Comparing
the effects of quadrupedal running exercise with
those of the bipedal standing, it becomes evident
in both experiments that the possible effects of
loading are recognized in the cross-sectional prop-
erties of the femur proximal to the mid-shaft.
Especially, an increase in the cross-sectional area
from mid-shaft to the proximal 30% level and
in the area moment of inertia in antero-posterior
direction in the vicinity of the lesser trochanter
is in common to both exercises.
On the other hand, the flattening of the cross-
sections along the femoral diaphysis proximal to
the mid-shaft induced by running exercise was not
observed in the bipedal standing exercise. Possible
reason for such commoness and difference could
be that in the running exercise, the femoral
cross sections adapts exclusively to the medio-
lateral bending and axial compressive load in the
proximal diaphysis, while in the bipedal standing exercise, they adapt to both medio-lateral and
antero-posterior bending or axial compressive
load in the proximal diaphysis and, at the same
time, also to torsional load at the mid-shaft.
Such a difference in adaptation of the cross-
sectional properties. between the quadrupedal running and bipedal standing exercises appears to
provide an experimental evidence for the different morphological change related to different mode
of loading. Our observation adds support to the
points of RUFF (1989) that intra- and interspecific differences in locomotor behavior can be identi-fied through the cross-sectional characteristics.
Comparing the cross-sectional geometry of the
femur in three species of macaques, BURR et al.
(1989) concluded that 'barrel-shaped' femur may be associated with leaping behavior and that the
structural rigidity of the femur per unit body weight is larger in the species spending longer
time in terrestrial environments.
When the mode of exercise is different,
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 467
participating muscles, timing of muscle contrac-tions, gravitational force, and joint reaction
forces would be different, which may yield a
different mechanical environment for the bone.
In the quadrupedal running exercise, those
muscles which insert or arise from the third
trochanter, i.e., m. pectineus, mm. adductor
longus et brevis, m. gluteus maximus, and m.
vastus lateralis are very instrumental
(NICOLOPOULOS-STOURNARAS and ILES,1984), and thus are thought to be responsible for the
cross-sectional geometry (MATSUMURA and
OKADA, 1987). On the other hand, in the rats loaded with the bipedal standing exercise, the
relative weight of individual muscle groups of the
hindlimb and hip tended to increase excluding the
intra-pelvic muscles. Among the thigh muscles,
relative weight of m. biceps femoris (anterior head) increased and that of m. gracilis posticus
also tended to increase (MATSUMURA and
OKADA, 1990). In the bipedal standing, therefore, muscle groups or timing of contrac-
tions different from those functioning or
occurring in the running exercise are supposed to
be related to the femur cross-sectional geometry.
To identify the relations, however, closer
examinations of the muscle tissue as well as
electromyographic observation will be necessary.
A femur with flattened and pilastered cross
section has been well-documented for the femur of the prehistoric and modern hunter-
gatherers, and one reason for such morphology has been claimed to be vigorous muscular
actions in the lower extremity (BUXTON, 1938;
YAMAGUCHI, 1982; KIMURA and TAKAHASHI,
1982). Identification of the muscular contribu-
tions in different mode of exercise, using
hereditary homogenous rats, may throw light on the above discussion of the human femur.
Since the cross-sectional area in the proximal
shaft of the femur increased in the bipedal
standing exercise, suggesting an increase in the
axial compressive strength, it appears that
gravitational effects as well as muscular forces
play an important role in the morphological
adaptation of the femur. A closer examination
from this viewpoint is also needed.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their
gratitude to Prof. S. INOKUCHI of Showa University for providing experimental facilities
and encouragements. They are also grateful to
Prof. B. ENDO of the University of Tokyo for
helpful suggestions. Thanks are also due to Mr.
H. ISONO, Mr. M. MORIMOTO, and Mr. K.
NAKAI for their technical assistance.
Part of this paper was presented at the 12th
International Congress of Anthropological and
Ethnological Sciences in Zagreb, Yugoslavia.
抄 録
二足起立運動負荷がラット大腿骨の断面形態に及ぼ
す影響
松村秋芳・岡田守彦
ヒ トの下肢が二足 行動 にどのよ うに適 応 して いる
かを理解 す るため に,力 学的 な環境 と骨 形態 の関連
性を研究 す る ことは重要 であ る.こ の観 点 か らこれ
まで ヒ トや サル類の下肢骨 を材料 と して,骨 体 横断
面の 力学 的特性値 や骨 に生ず る応力 と骨 に作用 す る
筋収縮 力 との関連 性,あ るいは ロコモー シ ョン様式
との関 係が調 べ られて きた.特 定 の様式 の運動 負荷
が骨 の形態 に及 ぼす影響 を詳 しく調 べ るた めに は,
同一 の遺 伝的背 景を もち,生 活 環境 と負荷 の条 件 を
コ ン トロール した実験動物 を用 いることが望 ま しい.
すで に著者 らは ラッ トを用 いて強制走行運 動負 荷が
大腿骨 の骨幹 に沿 った断面特性 値 に及 ぼす影響 につ
いて報告 した.
今回 は Sprague-Dawley 系 の雄 ラ ッ ト17匹 を実 験
群 と対 照 群 に分 け,二 足 起 立運 動 負荷 が 成長 期 の
ラ ッ ト大腿骨骨 幹に沿 った部位 ごとの断面形態 に及
ぼす影響を しらべ た.装 置は,オ ペ ラン ト条件付 けに
よる レバ ー押 しを利用 して小 型実験動物 に二足起 立
468 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
運動 を負荷 で きる"バ イペ ダル ・トレーニ ングボ ッ
ク ス"を 用 いた.負 荷 は1日2セ ッシ ョン,朝 と夜 の
摂 食時間帯 に定 率給餌 の条件 下で セ ッシ ョンあた り
の レバ ー押 し反応数 に して平均125回 与 えた.動 物
の体 重 に は実 験 期間 を通 して両 群間 で有 意 差が な
か った.大 腿骨 は近位側 か ら最大長 の30%-75%の
区間を5%お きに10箇 所切断 し,拡 大写真か ら断面
特性値 を計算 した.そ の結 果,二 足起立運動負荷 は大
腿 骨骨幹 に沿 った部位 ごとの断面形態 に対 して次 の
よ うな効果 を示 した.
1) 全 般 的 に断 面2次 モ ー メ ン ト,主 断 面2次
モー メ ン ト,断 面2次 極 モーメ ン トおよび断面積 を
大 きくす る傾 向がある.
2) と くに骨幹 の中央 部 ない し近 位部 にお いて,
前後方 向,左 右方向 の断 面2次 モ ーメ ン トおよび断
面積を大 きくす る.す なわち,こ れ らの部位で は前後
方向,左 右方 向の曲 げ強度 と骨幹 の長軸方 向の圧縮
強度が増 加す る.
3) と くに骨幹 中央部近辺 にお いて,断 面2次 極
モ ー メン トを大 きく し,主 軸 を外旋 させ る.す なわ
ち,こ れ らの部位で は擬 りに対 す る抵抗 が増加す る
が,こ の と きの振 りの加 わ る方 向は外旋方 向 と考 え
られ る.
4) これ らの結果 と,さ きに報告 した四足走 行負
荷 ラッ ト(MATSUMURA and OKADA,1987)の 大腿骨
断面形態 の比較 か ら,以 下の よ うな共通点 およ び相
違点が認め られた.
a) 両負荷 様式 と もに,中 央部周辺 な い し近 位部
で断面積 と左右方 向断面2次 モーメ ン ト,ま た近 位
部で前後方 向断面2次 モーメ ントが増加す る.
b) 二足起 立負荷 ラッ トでは,前 後方 向断面2次
モ ーメ ン トの増加 が,中 央 部周辺 か らやや近位 部 に
か けて も生 ず るが,こ の部 位にお け る同様 の変 化 は
走行負 荷 ラッ トには認 め られな い.
c)二 足起立負荷 ラ ットは,中 央部周辺 において,
走 行負荷 ラッ トで は認 め られな い断面2次 極 モーメ
ン トの増加 と主軸方向の外旋を示す.
d) 走行負 荷 ラ ッ トでは,中 央部周辺 か ら近位 側
で断面形態 の主軸方向 への扁平化 が観 察 されたが,
二足起立負荷 ラッ トで は このよ うな変化 はみ られ な
い.
以上 の結果 よ り,運 動負荷 はその様式 にかか わ ら
ず,ラ ッ ト大腿骨 の中央 部周 辺か ら近 位側 において
断面 形態 の変 化を もた らす一方,特 定 の部位 におい
て,運 動 様式 の違 いに対応 す る変化 を生 じさぜ る こ
とが 明 らか とな った.
References
BURR, D.B., G. PIOTROWSKI, R.B. MARTIN and P.N. COOK, 1982: Femoral mechanics in the lesser
bushbaby (Galago senegalensis): Structural adapta- tion to leaping in primates. Anat. Rec., 202: 419-429.
BURR, D.B., G. PIOTROWSKI and G.J. MILLER, 1981: Structural strength of the macaque femur. Am. J.
Phys. Anthropol., 54: 305-319. BURR, D.B., C.B. RUFF and C. JOHNSON, 1989:
Structural adaptations of the femur and humerus to arboreal and terrestrial environments in three species
of macaque. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 79: 357-367. BUXTON, L.H.D., 1938: Platymeria and platycnemia.
J. Anat. Lond., 73: 31-36. CASSIDY, J.D., K. YONG-RING, W.H. KIRKALDY-
WILLIS and A. A. WILKINSON, 1988: A study of the effects of bipedism and upright posture on the lumbosacral spine and paravertebral muscles of the Wister rat. Spine, 13: 301-308.
COLTON, H.S., 1929: How bipedal habit affects the bones of the hind legs of the albino rat. J. Exp. Zool.,
53: 1-11. ENDO, B. and H. TAKAHASHI, 1982: Various methods
for measuring the geometrical properties of the long bone cross section with respect to mechanics. J.
Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 90: 1-16. GOFF, C.W. and W. LANDMESSER, 1957: Bipedal rats
and mice. Laboratory animals for orthopaedic research. J. Bone Jt. Surg., 39-A: 616-622.
JINNAKA, S., 1929: On the deformity of the vertebrae. J. Jpn. Orthop. Assoc., 4: 1-41. (In Japanese)
[~Jj -,, 1929: ~1 fUJfJ. 4:1-41.] KAY, ED. and K. CONDON, 1987: Skeletal changes in
the hindlimbs of bipedal rats. Anat. Rec., 218: 1-4. KIMURA, T., 1971: Cross section of human lower limb
bones viewed from strength of materials. J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 79: 323-336.
KIMURA, T. and H. TAKAHASHI, 1982: Mechanical properties of cross-section of lower limb bones in
Jomon man. J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 90(Suppl.): 105-118.
LOVEJOY, C.O., A.H. BURSTEIN and K.G. HEIPLE, 1976: The biomechanical analysis of bone strength: A method and its application on platycnemia. Am.
J. Phys. Anthropol., 44: 489-506. LOVEJOY, C.O. and E. TRINKAUS, 1980: Strength and
robusticity of the Neanderthal tibia. Am. J. Phys. AnthropoL, 53: 465-470.
LANYON, L.E., A.E. GOODSHIP, C.J. PYE and J.H. MACFIE, 1982: Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling. J. Biomech., 15: 141-154.
Bipedal Standing and Rat Femur 469
MARTIN, R.B. and P.J. ATKINSON, 1977: Age and
sex-related changes in the structure and strength of
the human femoral shaft. J. Biomech., 10: 223-231.
MATSUMURA, A., 1986: Newly devised "bipedal training box" for the rats. Bull. Natl. Def. Med. Coll.,
9: 189-196. (In Japanese)
[松 村 秋 芳,1986:ラ ッ ト用 バ イ ペ ダ ル ・ト レー ニ
ング ボ ック ス(新 式 レバ ー押 し型 実 験 箱)の 開 発.
坊衛 医 科 大 学 校 進 学 課 程 研究 紀 要,9:189-196.]
MATSUMURA; A, and M. OKADA, 1987: Cross- sectional properties along the diaphysis of the rat
femur as influenced by forced running exercise. J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 95: 5-18.
MATSUMURA, A. and M. OKADA, 1990: Effects of erect bipedal standing on rat hindlimb muscles. J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 98: 213.
MATSUMURA, A., M. OKADA, A. TAKAHASHI and T. KIMURA, 1983: Cross-sectional properties of the rat femur as influenced by forced running exercise.
J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 91: 465-474. (In Japanese with English abstract)
MORAVEC, S.J. and J.F. CLEALL,1987: An assessment of posture in bipedal rats. Am. J. Anat., 180: 357-364.
NICOLOPOULOS-STOURNARAS, S. and J.F. ILES,1984: Hindlimb muscle activity during locomotion in the rat
(Rattus norvegicus) (Rodentia: Muridae). J. Zool. Lond., 203: 427-440.
PIZIALI, R.L., T.K. HIGH and D.A. NAGEL, 1980: Geometric properties of human leg bones. J.
Biomech., 13: 881-885. PRATT, L.W., 1943: Behavior of bipedal rats. Bull.
Johns Hopkins Hosp., 72: 265-273. REYNOLDS, G.S., 1975: A Primer of Operant Condi-
tioning. Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview. RIESENFELD, A., 1966: The effects of experimental
bipedalism and upright posture in the rat and their significance for the study of human evolution. Acta Anat., 65: 449-521.
ROESLER, H., 1987: The history of some fundamental concepts in bone biomechanics. J. Biomech., 20:
1025-1034. RUFF, C.B., 1989: New approaches to structural
evolution of limb bones in primates. Folia Primatol., 53: 142-159.
RUFF, C.B. and W.C. HAYES, 1983: Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae - A
biomechanical investigation: I. Method and general
patterns of variation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 60: 359-381.
RYBICKI, E.F., F.A. SIMONEN and E.B. WEIS, 1972: On the mathematical analysis of stress in the human
femur. J. Biomech., 5: 203-215. SAKAMOTO, K., 1959: Study of skeletal change in
"bipedal rat" . Shikoku Acta Medica, 14: 1149-1168. (In Japanese with English abstract)
SAVILLE, P.D, and RE. SMITH, 1966: Bone density, breaking force and leg muscle mass as functions of
weight in bipedal rats. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 25: 35-40.
SMITH, R.E. and PD. SAVILLE, 1966: Bone breaking stress as a function of weight bearing in bipedal rats.
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 25: 159-164. TAKAHASHI, H., 1982a: Perigraphic study of the
proximal half of the human femoral diaphysis. J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon, 90: 291-302.
TAKAHASHI, H., 1982b: Geometrical properties of the femur shaft. In: Biomechanism 6. Soc.
Biomechanism, Japan, ed., Univ. Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 17-25. (In Japanese with English abstract)
TAKAHASHI, H. and K. ADACHI, 1982: A program for analyzing two dimensional forms using a digitzer. Interface. 59: 200-214. (In Javanese)
[高橋 秀 雄 ・足 立 和 隆,1982:デ ジ タイ ザ に よ る2
次元 図形 解 析 プ ロ グ ラム.イ ンタ ー フ ェ ー ス,59:
200-214.]
USHIKUBO, S., 1959: Study of intervertebral disc herniation in "bipedal rat". Shikoku Acta
Medica, 15: 1757-1780. (In Japanese with English abstract)
WOLFF, J., 1870: Uber die innere Architektur der Knochen and ihre bedeutung fur die Frage vom
Knochenwachstum. Virchows Arch. Path. Anat. Physiol., 50: 389-453.
WOLFF, J., 1892: Das Gezetz der Transformation der Knochen. Hirschwald, Berlin.
YAMADA, K., 1962: The dynamics of experimental posture. Experimental study of intervertebral disc
herniation in bipedal animals. Clin. Orthoped., 25: 20-31.
YAMAGUCHI, B., 1982: A review of the osteological characteristics of the Jomon population in
prehistoric Japan. J. Anthrop. Soc. Nippon., 90(suppl.): 77-90.
470 A. MATSUMURA and M. OKADA
松 村 秋 芳
AkiyoShi MATSUMURA
防衛医科大学校生物学科
〒359所 沢市並木3-2
Department of Biology, National Defense Medical College
3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa 359, Japan