agricultural development economics division (esa) food and agriculture organization of the united...

21
Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect domestic economies and food security during the world food crisis? David Dawe, FAO World Bank, 29 September 2011

Upload: jaydon-bun

Post on 31-Mar-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

How did international price movements affect domestic

economies and food security during the world

food crisis?

David Dawe, FAO

World Bank, 29 September 2011

Page 2: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 2Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Rapid growth in emerging economies.

Population continues to increase.

Possible biofuels expansion.

Increasingly scarce natural resources in some regions.

Declining rates of yield growth for some commodities.

Stronger linkages between agricultural and energy markets

Increased frequency of weather shocks.

High and volatile prices are likely to continue

Page 3: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 3Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Household surveys seem to indicate that the poorest quintile are net food buyers in most countries, although there are exceptions.

Benefits of high prices tend to accrue to farmers with ample land and water.

More research should be done in estimating the magnitude of labor market effects.

Higher food prices represent an opportunity to reduce poverty, but only if they induce investment that shifts out the supply curve.

High food prices generally hurt the poor

Page 4: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 4Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Staple food prices are analyzed because the basket used to calculate food price inflation is not representative of the expenditure patterns of the poor.

All prices are adjusted for inflation.

All analysis is done in local currency terms so as to understand trends from the domestic point of view

Methods used

Page 5: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 5Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Rice prices in the Philippines, Jan 2005 to Dec 2007

The choice of currency matters

Page 6: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 6Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Only one dataset for any given country for each commodity.

Level of the marketing system (retail chosen before wholesale).

Quality (lowest quality was chosen).

Location (National average whenever possible).

There were 42, 27 and 34 datasets for rice, wheat and maize respectively.

Data selection

Page 7: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 7Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Domestic staple food prices, Jan 2007 to Dec 2010

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

Ind

ex

(Jan

uar

y 2

00

7 =

10

0)

Rice Wheat Maize

The level of domestic prices increased substantially

Page 8: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 8Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Domestic staple food price volatility

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

Rice Maize Wheat

Domestic price volatility increased as well

Page 9: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 9Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Domestic and world rice prices, China, 2005-2008

Policies matter (1)

Page 10: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 10Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Domestic and world soybean prices, China, 2005-2008

Policies matter (2)

Page 11: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 11Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Domestic and world maize prices, Zambia, 2004-2006

Policies matter (3)

Page 12: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 12Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Domestic & world rice prices, Jan 2007 to Dec 2010

Prices increased less in large countries (1)

Page 13: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 13Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Domestic & world wheat prices, Jan 2007 to Dec 2010

Prices increased less in large countries (2)

Page 14: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 14Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Domestic & world maize prices, Jan 2007 to Dec 2010

Prices increased less in large countries (3)

Page 15: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 15Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Analyzed 32 commodity pairs in 11 African countries (one major cereal and one traditional staple in the same country)

The price ratio of major cereal to traditional staple increased an average of 21% between 2006 and 2008. The average price ratio increased in all 11 countries.

Over the period 2005-2010, domestic rice or wheat prices were always the least volatile.

Major cereals & traditional staples (sorghum, millet, cassava)

Page 16: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 16Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Percentage increase in real prices, 2003-2008

Farm prices generally increased as retail prices increased

Page 17: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 17Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Producer and consumer white maize prices, Burkina Faso, 2003-2010

Farm prices generally increased as retail prices increased

Page 18: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 18Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Item 2007 2008 Percent increase

Seed 484 936 93

Fertilizer 3269 6691 105

Labor 3116 4765 53

Other costs 2928 2941 0

Yield (kg/hectare) 6100 5792 -5

Price (VND/kg) 2350 3700 57

Profit 4538 6097 34

VND is Vietnamese dong. Costs and profits are in thousand VND per hectare.

Higher output prices generally more than compensated for higher input costs

Input costs & profits for winter-spring paddy, An Giang, Viet Nam

Page 19: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 19Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Increase in cereal production by country groups

Country group Percent increase, 2007-

2008

OECD 6.2

BRICS 8.2

All others 7.2

Source of raw data: FAOStat (2011)

Supply response was strong

Page 20: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 20Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Price transmission was far from complete, but it was rapid and substantial…

… except in some countries that were not too dependent on imports and used trade policy to block transmission.

Generally speaking, farm prices seemed to increase whenever retail prices increased, and supply response was strong as a result (even though input costs rose).

The price increases were bad for food security and poverty in the short-term, but if they provide the spark to increased long-term investment in agriculture, they may turn out to be positive.

Summary

Page 21: Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations How did international price movements affect

Washington DC, 29 September 2011 21Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Agricultural Development Economics Division

Thank you for your kind attention