Ca se 2 :02- cr-2 0 449 -SH M D oc um e nt 1 296 R Ied 0 3/ 13 /1 2 Pag e 1 o f 6 Pa gelD 409 7 TN TH E U NIT ED S T A TE S DIS TR I CT CO URT FO R T HE WE STE RN DIS RTI C T OF TE N N E SS E E W ES T ER N D IVIS ION UN ITE D S T AT E S O F AM ER ICA , P l ain ti ff, v. N o . 02- 2 044 9 -M a CL INT O N L E W IS A ND M AR TIN L EW IS, D e fen d an ts . A DD I TIO NA L S UPP LEM EN TAL ME MO R AN DU M O F LA W I N S UPP OR T O F MO TIO N FO R MIS TRI AL PUR SUA NT TO B RA DY VIO LA T IO N C OM ES NOW th e De fend ant, Cl in ton L ew i s, by and thro ugh co unse l of r ec or d, C. Ann e Tip ton an d Ho w ard B . Ma n is, a nd res p ect f ully sup plem ents hi s prev ious me m or a ndu m o f law in su p por t of M otio n fo r M istr ial purs uant t o Brad y vio l atio n . T n s u ppo r t, Def e nda n t wo u ld s ta te a s fo llo w : 1 . Jen cks Ac t d oe s n o t e xcu s e ta rdy d i sclo sure o f Brad y m ate r ial. T h e go ver n men t ha s re p rese nted to the C o urt reli ance on th e Je nck s Ac t as a b a sis f or it s ta r dy d iscl o sur e o f th e p re-t rial ex c ulp a tor y sta tem e nts by w itn e ss Te M ar c us Ca rtwr ight . Ac cord ing to M r. Cart wrig ht h e wa s in terv iewe d by the go vern men t on t hre e s epa ra te o cca sion s , in 20 0 8, Dec emb er 20 11 an d Feb ruar y 2 , 20 1 2. Du r ing Cou r t pr ocee ding s o n M ar ch 1 2, 2 0 12 t h e go vern men t rep rese n ted to th e C ou r t th at n o a ud io re c ord i ngs exi s ted rega rdin g any of th e th r ee inte r view s wit h thi s w itne s s. T h e on ly m emo rial o f the s e inte r view s w ith t he w itne ss w as
