Staff has worked with the applicant to refine several outstanding issues relating to urban design, transportation and parks and proposes the following change (added wording is underlined, deleted wording is struck through or deleted) to a condition of approval-

PROJECT ANYALSIS

Transportation (Pg.4) Consistent with the PD the development plan shows the construction of “Road A” (now designated as Street D) from Young Pine Rd. to Lee Vista Blvd. It also shows two streets from Site F (Phase 3) connecting to Lee Vista Blvd. The PD requires the completion of the Lee Vista Blvd extension prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for any build-ings on Sites D, E or F (Phases 2 & 3). The PD also requires the completion of the western segment of Road A (Lee Vista Blvd. to Site C) concurrently with development on Site C. However, it states the eastern segment of Road A (Young Pine Rd. to Site C) will be determined at the time of SPMP for Site C. Staff is requiring the full construction of Road A with the development of Site C (phase 1). Phase 1 consists of the development of 182 residential units and can not be limited to one vehicular access point when a viable option exists. Staff will allow an interim condition, a stabilized access, prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, however a permeant access will be required prior to com-pletion of Phase 1 or June 2024, whichever occurs first. Open Space (Pg 5) The proposed 3 phase SPMP includes 3.27 acres of park acreage, comprised of 3 parks, one in each phase. Per the PD, parks require MPB SPMP review and must be constructed concurrently with the infrastructure for each phase. The applicant has satisfied this requirement but additional details on structures, fencing and materials are still needed and will require a Letter of Determination to finalize. The PD also requires that 50% of the perimeter of any park must be bound by public streets or building frontages to allow ample views into the park for security reasons. As submitted the parks are not in compliance with said requirement and require additional design refinement. The applicant is working with staff on alternative locations and a Letter of Determination for final site plan review is required to ensure compli-ance.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

Urban Design 3. Per phone and email correspondence, all elevations for the front loaded SF home and townhome developments will be revised per initial comments dated May 2018. Elevations will be available no later than September 5, 2018. Per the approved PD Ordinance for Beltway Commerce Center the following pertinent conditions: Corner Jots must be 10 feet wider than the rest of the lots on the block to accommodate the street side yard set-

back. The architectural details and exterior finish materials for units on corner lots, alley corner lots or open space facing

lots must be similar to the front fa9ade on the entire street-side, alley side, or open space facing elevations. Building foundations for the front fa9ade must be elevated at least 18 inches above the crown of the road by incor-

porating either a raised concrete pad, a raised wood joist floor with perimeter foundation, grading, or a combination of the above.

Staf f Report to the Munic ipal P lanning Board September 18 , 2018

PINEWOOD RESERVE SPMP

M P L 2 0 1 8 - 1 00 4 8 I t e m # 4 AD D E N D U M

Canopy Model Elevation FM1A Front door must be moved forward to be located 12” behind the flex room wall façade The garage projects 8’ per the PD the garage can only project a maximum of 5’. Revised floor plan to meet PD re-

quirements. Add architectural element above the garage Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Elevation FM2A Enlarge decorative louver at garage Add windows to the garage door Add 1.5-2” raised trim around windows Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Elevation FM2C will not be offered Elevation C2B Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Oasis Model Elevation FM1A Add an architectural element above the garage Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Elevation FM2A Enlarge decorative louver at garage Add windows to the garage door Add 1.5-2” raised trim around windows Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Elevation FM2C will not be offered Elevation C2B Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Add a cedar shake material in both gables Citrus Grove Model Elevation FM1A Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Increase the width of the horizontal band between the first and second floor. The increased band width can help

mask the shear wall appearance. Add a window on the second floor above front door Elevation FM2A Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Add stone at the base of the front façade to match the stone on the front porch entry Wrap stone at the top on both sides of the front porch Add a window on the second floor above front door Elevation FM2C will not be offered Elevation C2B

Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Add a window on the second floor above front door Sandhill Model Elevation FM1A Add a window on the second floor above front door Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Elevation FM2A Add a window on the second floor above front door Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Elevation FM2C will not be offered Elevation C2B Add a window on the second floor above front door Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Boardwalk Model Elevation FM1A not approved as submitted —Facades are not articulated Elevation FM2A not approved as submitted —Facades are not articulated Elevation C2B Add windows to the garage door Provide a 8’ tall door with full lite Rear Loaded Townhomes Additional transparency must be provided on the 1st and 2nd floor, on the left and right elevations Transparency must be added to end unit garages on the left and right elevations

Transportation 7. Per the amended and restated PD Ordinance, “A date certain for the completion of the eastern segment of Road A (Young Pine Road to Site C) will be determined during SPMP review of proposed development within Site C.” This street, now designated as “Street D”, shall be constructed and completed by the developer prior to June 1, 2020. If this street is not delivered to the City by this date, no additional building permits will be issued for Phases 1, 2, or 3 until Street D is accepted by the City. As such the following is required:

•A full access from Lee Vista Blvd to Phase 1 will be provided prior to the first certificate of occupancy. • A stabilized access from Phase 1 to Young Pine Road (eastern portion of Road A) will be provided prior to the first certificate of occupancy as a secondary emergency access only. • The above stabilized access (eastern portion of Road A) will be brought up to city standards to provide a full sec-ond access for Phase 1 to Young Pines Road prior to the 140th certificate of occupancy of Phase 1 OR June 1st of 2024 (whichever event happens first).

If this street is not delivered to the City by this date, no additional building permits will be issued for Phases 1, 2, or 3 until Street D is accepted by the City.

Parks 4. Each park shall undergo Letter of Determination to finalize all park details to include details on locations, structures, fencing and materials are still needed. 11. Parks (not to include the cabana building and the pool) shall be open to the public and shall not be fenced or gated or otherwise restricted in who has use of them. Portions of parks may be fenced and gated, upon approval by City Plan-ning Official, if deemed necessary for maintenance or safety requirements. This gating requirement is not applicable to the pool, though the pool is still subject to standard gating requirements of the Florida Building Code.

Property Location: 31-23-17-0000-00-012 ; north of Leevista Rd., west of Young Pine Rd., east of SR 417 and south of Wa-terside Point Cir. (±237.8 acres, District 1). Applicant’s Request: The applicant is requesting Master Plan ap-proval for a Specific Parcel Master Plan (SPMP) for development of 465 townhomes and single family residential units in three phases. This development is part of the Beltway Commerce Center Planned Devel-opment (PD).

S U M M A R Y

Location Map Subject Site

Owner

Beltway Commerce Cen-ter CD93

Applicant

Cliff Torres

Project Planner

Michaëlle Petion, AICP

Staf f Report to the Munic ipal P lanning Board September 18 , 2018

PINEWOOD RESERVE SPMP

M P L 2 0 1 8 - 1 00 4 8 I t e m # 4

Staff’s Recommendation: Approval of the request, subject to the condi-tions in this report. Public Comment Courtesy notices were mailed to property owners within 300 ft. of the subject property during the week of September 4, 2018. As of the published date of this report, staff has received no comments from the public con-cerning this request.

Updated: Sept. 10, 2018

Page 2

Future Land Use Map

Zoning Map

Page 3

Project Analys is Project Description The +237.8 acre subject property is located north of Leevista Rd., west of Young Pine Rd., east of SR 417 and south of Waterside Point Cir. The applicant is requesting SPMP approval for development of 465 residential units (230 town-homes and 235 single family) in three phases. This development is part of the Beltway Commerce Center Planned De-velopment (PD). Phase 1 contemplates the commencement of construction in December 2018 with phase 2 to start in December 2020 and phase 3 in September 2022. The site has Future Land Use designations of Office Low Intensity and Conservation and a zoning designation of PD/AN (Planned Development/Aircraft Noise overlay) and PD. The proposal is consistent with the Zoning and Future Land Use designations. Previous Actions: 1991- Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order (DO) for Beltway Commerce Center was adopted

by Orange County (O.R. Book 4366, Page 3658) 1998- +/-74 acre portion of the DRI was annexed into the City and provided with an initial zoning of PD. (doc#:

29646-1 and 31382, respectively) 2007- PD boundaries were amended and extended along the east to encompass the remaining +/-452 acres of the

DRI. (doc#: 0711121006) 2013- DRI Development Order was rescinded (Ord. No. 2013-11), 290 multifamily units were added to the develop-

ment program and Subarea Policy S.39.4. In addition, PD and PD/AN zoning were amended to reflect new residen-tial development (doc#: 1303251202).

Jan. 2018- The MPB approved a future land use amendment from industrial to office low intensity for the subject property. Also, Subarea Policy S.39.4 and the PD were revised to allow up to 500 dwelling units (townhomes & sin-gle-family) overall (GMP2017-10019, GMP2017-10020, ZON2017-00014)

Project Context The surrounding future land use and zoning designations are provided in Table 1 below. The Villages at Waterside resi-dential development is the Planned Development located to the north. Three separate residences are located to the east.

Conformance with the GMP The proposed residential use is allowed under the approved Beltway Commerce Center Planned Development (PD). Office Low Intensity future land use sets a maximum density of 21 dwelling units per acre (du/ac); the proposed density (about 4.55 du/ac) is consistent with that designation. The site is located within Aircraft Noise Control Zone E, for which the LDC requires notification for residential uses. The site is within the Vista East subarea (No. 39) and is subject to GMP Future Land Use Subarea Policy S.39.4. That policy was amended to include a maximum of 500 dwelling units on the subject property. As submitted, the applicant indicates impacts to 6.80 ac of wetlands, and the release of 4.85 ac of conservation easement. This impact will require approval from the St. John Management District as well as a GMP

Table 1—Project Context

Future Land Use Zoning Surrounding Use

North Medium Density Residential & Indus-trial (Orange County Jurisdiction)

P-D & IND-1 (Orange County

Jurisdiction)

Residential and vacant land

East Office Low Intensity & Conservation A-2 & IND-1 (Orange County

Jurisdiction)

Residential

South Urban Activity, Industrial & Conserva-tion

PD (Beltway Com-merce Center)

Vacant Land

West N/A N/A Central Florida Greenway (SR 417)

Page 4

amendment to accurately reflect the change on the City’s future land use maps. This amendment may be approved ad-ministratively, if compensatory open space is provided on site that results in no net change in conservation acreage. If net loss of conservation easement will occur, the amendment must be approved by the MPB. Conformance with the LDC The development site has an existing zoning designation of PD. The PD process is intended to facilitate unique, individu-ally planned developments which are not otherwise permitted. The standards and procedures of this district are intended to promote flexibility of design and permit planned diversification and integration of uses and structures, while at the same time retaining in the City Council the absolute authority to establish such limitations and regulations as it deems necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. The initial PD was adopted in 1998 and last amended earlier this year. The proposed project is within the Beltway Commerce Center PD which is permitted a maximum of 500 residential units. Proposed is a total of 465 units comprised of 230 townhomes and 235 single family houses. Housing types may vary by lot size and form. These criteria are intended to insure that homes integrate well with each other and share designs which make neighborhood streets safe and enjoyable to walk along. According to the Residential Standards of the PD, lot sizes and patterns within a neighborhood shall be varied to a diverse range of housing types. Development Standards: The SPMP process is intended to establish the actual dimensions for each lot and product type. Below is the table, as provided in the PD, that outlines the typical development standards for townhomes and single family front-loaded and rear-loaded lots. See the PD ordinance for the full table, to include table notes.

Transportation Consistent with the PD the development plan shows the construction of “Road A” (now designated as Street D) from Young Pine Rd. to Lee Vista Blvd. It also shows two streets from Site F (Phase 3) connecting to Lee Vista Blvd. The PD requires the completion of the Lee Vista Blvd extension prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for any build-ings on Sites D, E or F (Phases 2 & 3). The PD also requires the completion of the western segment of Road A (Lee Vista Blvd. to Site C) concurrently with development on Site C. However, it states the eastern segment of Road A (Young Pine Rd. to Site C) will be determined at the time of SPMP for Site C. Staff is requiring the full construction of Road A with the development of Site C (phase 1). Phase 1 consists of the development of 182 residential units and can not be limited to one vehicular access point when a viable option exists. The applicant has submitted typical road cross-sections for its collector/local roads and alleys, some of which are incon-sistent with those of the PD. Conformance is required.

Table 3—Residential Development Standards*

Product

Type

Minimum

Lot Width

Minimum

Lot Depth

Minimum

Street

Frontage

Front

Yard

Setback

Rear Yard

Setback

Side Yard

Setback

Street

Side Yard

Setback

Maximum

Building

Height

Maximum

ISR

Single

Family

Front

Loaded

50 feet

100 feet

25 feet

16 feet

15 feet

5 feet

15 feet

3 stories

70%

Single

Family

Rear

Loaded

30 feet

100 feet

25 feet

16 feet

5 feet or

greater than

16 feet

5 feet

15 feet

3 stories

70%

Town-

home

Rear

Loaded

18 feet

80 feet

18 feet

16 feet

5 feet or

greater than

16 feet

0 feet

15 feet

3 stories

90%

*See PD for additional table notes.

Page 5 Page 5

Open Space The proposed 3 phase SPMP includes 3.27 acres of park acreage, comprised of 3 parks, one in each phase. Per the PD, parks require MPB SPMP review and must be constructed concurrently with the infrastructure for each phase. The applicant has satisfied this requirement but additional details on structures, fencing and materials are still needed and will require a Letter of Determination to finalize. The PD also requires that 50% of the perimeter of any park must be bound by public streets or building frontages to allow ample views into the park for security reasons. As submitted the parks are not in compliance with said requirement and require additional design refinement. School Impact On July 7, 2008, the City adopted a Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) and the Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Concurrency which requires all residential developments be sub-ject to school concurrency review. The agreement was amended and restated on March 9, 2011. Under the terms of the agreement, the City will advise OCPS of comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments, and development pro-posals that may have the effect of increasing existing density. For this master plan request concurrency approval is re-quired.

Page 6 Page 6

Aerial Photo

Subject Site

Page 7

P D E x h i b i t C

SPMP boundary

Site E (Phase 2)

Site C (Phase 1)

Site F (Phase 3)

Site D (Phase 2)

“Road A”

Page 8

Proposed Si te Plan

“Road A” (now designated as Street D)

SPMP boundary

Page 9

Survey

Page 10

Typical Sect ions

Page 11

Typical Sect ions

Page 12

Landscape Plan (Park Detai ls)

PK-3, located in Site F of Phase 3.

Page 13

Landscape Plan (Park Detai ls)

PK-1, located in Site C of Phase 1.

Page 14

Landscape Plan (Park Detai ls)

PK-2, located in Site E of Phase 2.

Page 15

Sample Archi tecture

A front-loaded model

A townhome model

Page 16

Site Photos

Subject site as viewed from Young Pine Rd.

Townhome development north of the subject property as viewed from Young Pine Rd.

Page 17 Page 17

Condit ions of Approval

Growth Management 1) Concurrency approval by Orange County Public Schools is required. 2) Approval from the St. Johns River Water Management District is required for the potential wetland impacts. 3) Please provide a Future Land Use map, showing FLU boundaries overlaid with the development plan. This map will clearly indicate desired conservation boundary changes; any compensatory open space provided; and acreage meas-urements, including overall net change in conservation acreage. A GMP amendment to change the boundaries of the conservation easements is required. Land Development 1. Subject To Codes. Except as provided herein, the development is subject to all codes and ordinances of the State of Florida, City of Orlando, and all other applicable regulatory agencies. The residential sites have a default zoning of R-3A. 2. Development Requirements. Except as modified herein, the project shall be developed in accordance with the require-ments of the Growth Management Plan, and any other pertinent provisions of the Conventional LDC, and the Beltway Commerce Center PD. 3. Approval. Approval of the Specific Parcel Master Plan by City Council shall grant the applicant authority to submit an application for site plan/master plan review for a building permit. The application must be submitted within twenty-four (24) months of approval of the Specific Parcel Master Plan (by the City Council) or the Master Plan shall expire. Howev-er, upon written application filed 30 days prior to the expiration date, the Planning Official may renew the Master Plan for one period of up to 12 months providing good cause is shown. 4. Development Permits. As provided by subsection 166.033(5), Florida Statutes, issuance of a development permit by a municipality does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. In accordance with subsection 166.033(5), Florida Statutes, it is hereby made a con-dition of this permit that all other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the develop-ment. 5. Consistency. Unless amended by any conditions found herein or any modifications recommended by the MPB and

Findings Subject to the conditions contained herein, the proposal is consistent with the requirements for approval of Master Plan applications contained in Section 65.331 of the Land Development Code (LDC): 1. The proposed use is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the PD zoning district and all other requirements of

the LDC. 3. The proposed use will be compatible with surrounding land uses and the general character of the area. 4. The necessary public facilities will be adequate to serve the proposed use, or will be provided by the applicant as a

condition of this approval. Staff recommends approval of MPL2018-10048 subject to the conditions below:

Page 18 Page 18

approved by City Council, this project shall operate and be developed only as described and conditioned within this re-port and in accordance with the attached site plan and any other plans or commitments provided in the application pack-age. Any changes in the use of the site, the operation of the project, or the site plan as provided herein may require an amendment to the project and review by the MPB and City Council (see "Minor Modifications" condition below.) This ap-proval is not transferable to another property. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before com-mencing development. 6. Minor Modifications. Minor modifications to the project, including changes to the design and site plan reviewed by the Municipal Planning Board or City Council may be approved by the Planning Official without further review by the Munici-pal Planning Board. Major changes shall require additional review by the Municipal Planning Board. 7. Fencing. A uniform, architecturally detailed wall must be provided along Young Pine Rd. and Lee Vista Blvd. to screen the residential uses. Height is limited to 6 ft. maximum. 8. Entry Signage. The neighborhood signs are limited to 6 ft. in height and up to 20 sq. ft. in area. 9. Park. Common property lines shared by single-family residences and neighborhoods parks are limited to CPTED fenc-ing to enhance visibility in the park. 10. Phasing. Each phase must function independently. Urban Design 1. Landscape parkway strips for street trees must be at a minimum of 7.5ft wide. 2. Architectural elevations must be submitted for Appearance Review prior to application for building permits. Architectur-al elevations for each building are subject to review and approval for consistency with comments and PD ordinance. 3. Per phone and email correspondence, all elevations for the front loaded SF home and townhome developments will be revised per initial comments dated May 2018. Elevations will be available no later than September 5, 2018. 4. Corner lots must be 10 feet wider than the rest of the lots on the block to accommodate the street side yard setback. 5. Landscaping of single family must comply with Section 60.223 of the Orlando City Code. Landscaping themes should be consistent within each residential neighborhood site 6. Architectural comments for the rear loaded SF homes are :

• Floor plans are needed • The side façade elevations are needed • The rear elevations are needed • Provide transparency calculations for each model • Foundations for the front facade must be elevated at least 18 inches above the crown of the road by incorpo-rating either a raised concrete pad, a raised wood joist floor with perimeter foundation, grading, or a combination of the above • Trim for all windows on all models must be raised apprx. 1.5-2” • The purpose of the sidewalk is unclear along the sides of each home. Remove sidewalk Angelou Model • Introduce a second material at the base on the front porch columns • Provide 1 step up into the front porch • Provide side lights on both sides of front door Chauser Model • Add shutters to all windows on the front façade • Provide 1 step up into the front porch • Introduce a second material at the base on the front porch columns • Introduce a second material in the gable

Page 19 Page 19

• Provide side lights on both sides of front door Sinclair Model • Second floor window to the right must align with the center columns below • Introduce a second material on the second floor façade • Provide side lights on both sides of front door Whitman Model • The area located on the second floor front façade below the windows have an unusually large blank gap. In-crease the windows apprx. 18-24” in depth to fill/fit the façade • Introduce a second material at the base on the front porch columns • Provide trim around the front door • Provide 1 step up into the front porch • Provide side lights on both sides of front door Tennyson Model • Provide side lights on both sides of front door • Second floor façade appears vastly disproportionate to the first floor. Increase the windows apprx. 18-24” in depth to fill/fit the façade • Windows on the second floor must align with the windows and doors on the first floor • Introduce a second material at the base on the front porch columns • Provide 1 step up into the front porch • Trim underneath the roofline, on the second floor must wrap both side facades the entire length of the wall Fences

7. On a corner lot a 6’ tall privacy fence cannot extend beyond the corner of the house towards the side street. This shall also apply to homes with their side property line adjacent to a private alleyway. 8. On a corner lot a 4’ tall aluminum picket fence or a 3’ tall PVC picket fence can extend from the rear corner of the home towards the side street and sidewalk. A 2’ setback from the sidewalk is required so as to provide room for a re-quired landscape buffer between the fence and sidewalk. If the lot is bordered by a private alleyway than the required setback and landscape buffer shall be measured from the property corner. 9. Rear yard fences cannot extend more than 10’ from the rear corner of a home towards the front of the home. Howev-er, if there is an existing fence on the adjacent lot the fence corner needs to be shown on the fencing plan and an effort should be made to make the fencing corners match. 10. Rear loaded homes may request the use of a 3’ PVC picket fence to close in their front and or year yards. A 2’ set-back will be required from the front and rear property corners so as to provide room for additional landscaping. 11. Rear loaded homes may request the use of a 6’ tall PVC privacy fence or 4’ tall aluminum picket fence in their rear yard. However, additional landscape will be required to buffer the fence from the alleyway. Transportation 1. All aspects of the site plan are required to conform to all applicable minimum standards set forth in the Belt Commerce Center amended and restated Planned Development Ordinance as well as the editions of the City Code and the City Engineering Standards Manual that are in force at the time of any construction of this project. 2. Support of this submittal by the Transportation Dept. does not constitute final engineering approval of this concept for development. Materials and designs for transportation related elements of the project must meet or exceed standards in the versions of the City Code and Engineering Standards Manual in effect at the time of submittal to Permitting Services. 3. Proper sightlines must be maintained at all driveways and parking areas. Site plans and landscaping plans submitted to Permitting Services should include sightline triangles. AutoTurn analysis for emergency vehicles and solid waste col-lection should be attached to plans to prevent delays in processing. 4. All Street Cross Sections must conform to the cross sections approved in the amended and restated Beltway Com-merce Center Planned Development Ordinance. Specifically, the cross section for the extension of Lee Vista Bvld. to

Page 20 Page 20

Young Pine Rd. must include bike facilities beyond the curbs on both sides of the street. Additionally, accommodation for turn lanes must be provided at the Young Pine Rd intersection and at project entrances as warranted. 5. The intersection of Street A and Street D may be constructed as a roundabout or as a 4-way STOP condition with raised crosswalks meeting City of Orlando design standards. 6. Raised crosswalks built to City standards must be constructed at the following locations to provide traffic calming and discourage cut-through traffic.

a. On Street A at the crossing of the drainage easement b. On Street A at the intersection with Street B c. On Street D at Courtyard Tract CY-3 d. On Street D at Park Tract PK-2 e. On Street D at the eastern intersection with Street E

7. Per the amended and restated PD Ordinance, “A date certain for the completion of the eastern segment of Road A (Young Pine Road to Site C) will be determined during SPMP review of proposed development within Site C.” This street, now designated as “Street D”, shall be constructed and completed by the developer prior to June 1, 2020. If this street is not delivered to the City by this date, no additional building permits will be issued for Phases 1, 2, or 3 until Street D is accepted by the City. Parks 1. All acreage requirements for parks according the City’s Level of Service Standards shall be met or exceeded. Park and recreation facility amenities shall be provided per the Recreation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Each park should have amenities to allow both active and passive use of the space. Passive uses include seating areas, shade, picnic facilities. Active uses include basketball, tennis or other sports courts, community gardens, playgrounds and similar uses. 2. Parks shall be prominent within their neighborhoods and easily accessible. All residential units shall be within .25 miles of a public park. 3. At least 50% of the perimeter of any park or recreation facility shall be bound by public streets. The submitted design does not meet this requirement and must be redesigned. Private alleys are not public streets. 4. Each park shall undergo Letter of Determination to finalize all park details to include details on structures, fencing and materials are still needed. 5. Neighborhood parks for each phase must be completely constructed before 25% of the residential units in each neigh-borhood have been constructed. 6. Park land shall have well-drained soils suitable for building and development. 7. Land used for stormwater retention, drainage structures or wetlands will not be counted towards park land require-ments. 8. All parks and recreation facilities shall incorporate the principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). 9. Parks shall be designed and constructed to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements and guide-lines. 10. A playground with equipment suitable for ages 2 through 12 should be included in parks located in neighborhoods with more than 50 units. All playground equipment must comply with U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission Public Playground Safety Handbook guidelines, latest edition. 11. Parks shall be open to the public and shall not be fenced or gated or otherwise restricted in who has use of them. Portions of parks may be fenced and gated, upon approval by City Planning Official, if deemed necessary for mainte-

Page 21 Page 21

nance or safety requirements. Public Works 1. Per Section 7.01 of the City's ESM, any proposed project to be built in the City of Orlando which alters the existing topographic characteristics will be required to provide stormwater treatment. Alterations of surface drainage (with the exception of resurfacing and landscaping elements only) is defined as: changing the flow patterns within the redevelop-ment area; changing the mode of transport from overland flow or open channel to a closed conduit, etc.; changing an impervious surface’s character (from building to parking, wet bottom pond or a new building or vice versa); changing the character of a parking surface (from shell base to asphalt, etc.); or remodeling of an existing building which changes its footprint or number of floors. When applying for an Engineering Permit, please submit the Drainage Report, Geotech Report, Stormwater Tabulations, and all necessary docs needed in order to verify the City's and Water Manager District standards are met. 2. This site appears to be over 1 acre. Construction activities including clearing, grading and excavating activities shall obtain a FDEP NPDES NOI. A copy of the NPDES NOI Acknowledgement letter must be received in the Office of Per-mitting Services prior to permit approval. 3. Provide a certification signed by the Engineer, licensed in the State of Florida, responsible for the stormwater design which reads as follows: "I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the design of the Stormwater Man-agement System for the project known as: (Project Name) meets all of the requirements and has been designed sub-stantially in accordance with the City of Orlando Stormwater Management Criteria." 4. All proposed sidewalk will need to be updated to the newest ADA requirement. 5. Water quality recovery shall be recovered per the requirement of the Water Manager District. Please provide model demonstrating the recovery analysis. A Water Manager District water treatment permit may be required. 6. Please submit a signed and dated private/public improvements cost sheet. Cost sheet forms and instructions are available at our website at www.cityoforlando.net/permits. 7. A performance guarantee for public improvements is needed in the amount of 110% of the public improvements cost. Cost sheet forms and instructions are available at our website at www.cityoforlando.net/permits. Performance Guarantee is required before the issuance of the permit. The original needs to be hand delivered to the receptionist at Permitting Services with the referenced case number. In addition, attach a copy of this in the resubmittal package. Please allow approximately 1 week after the Performance Guarantee is submitted to allow for the City’s Legal Office to review. 8. For new building, please provide grading plan which includes existing and proposed elevations, corners and relevant elevations to be able to determine run-off flow pattern. 9. The survey need be signed and sealed with datum and official benchmark in the NAVD88 vertical datum. 10. Please note that the stormwater management system must be designed to meet the requirements of Chapter 7 of the Engineering Standards Manual. The project will be required to provide pollution abatement and flood protection. Pol-lution Abatement shall be provided per Water Management District. Flow attenuation for the 25-yr, 24-hr storm will be required. As such, please provide a pre-post volume analysis that shows the post development volume of runoff does not exceed the pre development volume of runoff. Please include recovery calculations per the requirements of Water Manager District.. 11. Other comments may arise depending on the contents submitted to permitting. 12. Section 7.04.02 Flood Prone Areas of the City of Orlando Engineering Standards Manual states that generally com-pensating storage must be calculated between the existing 100-year flood elevation and the wet season water table ele-vation. 13. Since the site is located with a flood zone A, please provide base (100-year) flood elevation (BFE) determination analysis.

Page 22 Page 22

Impact Fees 1. For informational purposes: The City has implemented a Parks Impact Fee on all residential housing units to help meet the recreation needs of Orlando’s residents. All new housing units are subject to the fee. Any new construction, change in use, addition or redevelopment of a site or structure shall be subject to a review for Parks Impact Fees. Applicable fees will be due at the time of building permit issuance, subject to change upon final per-mit plan review. A Parks Impact Fee credit may be given on residential units that were or are going to be demolished if eligibility require-ments are met. For questions and information regarding Parks Impact Fee rates you may contact Nancy Ottini at (407) 246-3529 or nancy.jurus-ottini@cityoforlando.net Any exemptions or credits against the Parks Impact Fee must be reviewed prior to permit issuance. All Parks Impact Fee Credits shall be reviewed and processed by the Parks Impact Fee Coordinator, if applicable, upon request by applicant.

Page 23 Page 23

Contact Informat ion Growth Management For questions regarding Growth Management plan review, please contact Megan Barrow at 407.246.3363 or megan.barrow@cityoforlando.net. Land Development For questions regarding Land Development review, please contact Michaëlle Petion at 407.246.3837 or michaelle.petion@cityoforlando.net. Urban Design For questions regarding Urban Design plan review, please contact Terrence Miller at 407.246.3292 or Terrence.miller@cityoforlando.net. Transportation For questions regarding Transportation review, please contact John Rhoades at 407.246.2293 or john.rhoades@cityoforlando.net Engineering/Zoning For questions regarding Development Review contact Keith Grayson at 407.246.3234 or keith.grayson@cityoforlando.net. Public Works For questions regarding Engineering Site review, please contact Liuliu Wu at 407.246.3758 or liuliu.wu@cityoforlando.net. Police For questions regarding Police plan review, please contact Audra Rigby at 407.246.2454 or audra.rigby@cityoforlando.net. Fire For any questions regarding fire issues, please contact Chip Howard at 407.246.2143 or at Charles.howard@cityoforlando.net. Building For questions regarding Building Plan Review issues contact Don Fields at 407.246.2654 or don.fields@cityoforlando.net. Parks For questions regarding Parks Plan Review issues contact Denise Riccio at 407.246.4249 or denise.riccio@cityoforlando.net. For questions regarding Tree Review issues contact Justin Garber at 407.246.4047 or Justin.garber@cityoforlando.net. Water Reclamation For questions regarding Parks Plan Review issues contact David Breitrick at 407.246.3525 or David.breitrick@cityoforlando.net.

Review/Approval Process—Next Steps

1. MPB minutes scheduled for review and approval by City Council 2. Plat 3. Planning Official Determination for building elevations and parks 4. Apply for building permits