academic planning benchmarks and metrics december 10, 2013 and january 14, 2014

29
Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Upload: donald-chapman

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics

December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Page 2: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Total Enrollment

Fall 2001

Fall 2002

Fall 2003

Fall 2004

Fall 2005

Fall 2006

Fall 2007

Fall 2008

Fall 2009

Fall 2010

Fall 2011

Fall 2012

Fall 2013

15,000

16,000

17,000

18,000

19,000

20,000

21,000

22,000

23,000

24,000

25,000

19,091

20,044 20,03320,339 20,394 20,388 20,376

21,507

22,386

23,389

24,447 24,591 24,548

Office of Institutional Research, January 13, 2014

Page 3: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Enrollment – New Entering Freshmen

Fall 2000

Fall 2001

Fall 2002

Fall 2003

Fall 2004

Fall 2005

Fall 2006

Fall 2007

Fall 2008

Fall 2009

Fall 2010

Fall 2011

Fall 2012

Fall 2013

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

2,78

3 2,99

8 3,24

8

2,81

9 3,09

3

3,06

2 3,29

8

3,39

8

4,21

7

3,77

7

3,90

7 4,08

6

3,94

6

3,88

1

UO Office of Enrollment Management, January 13, 2014

Page 4: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Enrollment – New Entering Transfers

Fall 2000

Fall 2001

Fall 2002

Fall 2003

Fall 2004

Fall 2005

Fall 2006

Fall 2007

Fall 2008

Fall 2009

Fall 2010

Fall 2011

Fall 2012

Fall 2013

800

900

1,000

1,100

1,200

1,300

1,400

1,500

1,33

1 1,39

7

1,28

8

1,37

3 1,44

1

1,43

6

1,29

4

1,25

9

1,09

5

1,29

4

1,43

3

1,38

1

1,47

5

1,358

UO Office of Enrollment Management, January 13, 2014

Page 5: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Average High School GPAEntering Freshmen

Fall 2000

Fall 2001

Fall 2002

Fall 2003

Fall 2004

Fall 2005

Fall 2006

Fall 2007

Fall 2008

Fall 2009

Fall 2010

Fall 2011

Fall 2012

Fall 2013

3.20

3.25

3.30

3.35

3.40

3.45

3.50

3.55

3.60

3.65

3.70

3.40

3.43

3.47

3.54

3.493.51 3.50 3.49 3.48

3.543.52

3.593.57

3.60

UO Office of Enrollment Management, October 25, 2013

Page 6: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

New Entering FreshmenBy Residency Status

Fall 2000

Fall 2001

Fall 2002

Fall 2003

Fall 2004

Fall 2005

Fall 2006

Fall 2007

Fall 2008

Fall 2009

Fall 2010

Fall 2011

Fall 2012

Fall 2013

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

71% 72% 69% 71% 68% 70% 66% 63%57% 58%

51% 53% 50% 51%

26% 25% 28% 26% 30% 27% 31% 32% 41% 37%44% 41%

40% 39%

3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 2% 5% 5% 6% 10% 10% International

Domestic Nonresident

Resident

UO Office of Enrollment Management, January 13, 2014

Page 7: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Admitted UndergraduatesBy Residency Status

Fall 2001

Fall 2002

Fall 2003

Fall 2004

Fall 2005

Fall 2006

Fall 2007

Fall 2008

Fall 2009

Fall 2010

Fall 2011

Fall 2012

Fall 2013

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

75% 75% 76% 76% 76% 74% 72% 69% 66% 63% 60% 58% 56%

19% 19% 19% 20% 20% 21% 23% 27% 28% 30% 32% 32% 32%

6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 6% 7% 8% 10% 12% International

Domestic Nonresident

Resident

Office of Institutional Research, January 13, 2014

Page 8: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Growth in Student Credit Hours2006-07 to 2012-13

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-130

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

CASLCBAAACOESOJCSOMDLawCHC

Office of Institutional Research, December 23, 2013

Page 9: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Ratio of tenure-related faculty to non-tenured

Oregon

Virginia

North Carolina

Michigan

Iowa

Indiana

Colorado

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.80.59

0.95

missing data

0.64

1.05

1.05

missing data

1.05

0.62

2007-082008-092009-102010-112011-12

Office of Institutional Research, January 9, 2014

Page 10: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Student / Instructional Faculty Ratio

Oregon

Washington

Virginia

UC Santa Barbara

Michigan

North Carolina

Iowa

Indiana

Colorado

0 5 10 15 20 2519

13

16

17

16

14

16

18

19

2008-092009-102010-112011-122012-13

Office of Institutional Research, December 9, 2013

Page 11: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Growth in Staff: Faculty, Classified and Unclassified

1999-00

2012-13

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

843

1,3251,196

1,6251,391

2,077

Officers of Administration ClassifiedFaculty

Office of Institutional Research, December 9, 2013

Page 12: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Square Feet of Classroom Space per Student FTE

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

2

4

6

8

10

12

1412.6

12.0

Office of Institutional Research, January 8, 2014

Page 13: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Square Feet of Office Space per Faculty FTE

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

168.5

145.0

144.5

131.9

Instructional FTE & Space Total FTE & Space

Office of Institutional Research, January 8, 2014

Page 14: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Undergraduate Class Size: SCH Earned in Courseswith Enrollment of <25 and >60

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

18.6% 20.0%

49.5% 49.1%

Percent of UG SCH Earned in Courses with Enrollment >60

Percent of UG SCH Earned in Courses with Enrollment <25

Office of Institutional Research, December 9, 2013

Page 15: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Graduate Student Credit Hours by Course Number

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-130%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

20.2% 19.7% 21.0% 20.7% 20.6%

75.3% 76.0% 74.7% 75.3% 75.4%

4.5% 4.3% 4.4% 4.0% 4.0%

500-level 600-level 700-level

Office of Institutional Research, December 9, 2013

Page 16: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

UNIVERSITY OF OREGONNRC Ranking of Research Doctorate Programs 2010

Page 17: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

AAU Comparison MetricsExamples:• Student selectivity measures • Student success measures• Research expenditures• Faculty productivity measures• Student-Faculty Ratios• Numbers of highly ranked programs• Total expenditures per student FTE• Philanthropy

Page 18: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

25th percentile and 75th percentile SAT scores for incoming freshman

We see that the middle band of UO SAT scores, generally between about 985 and 1224, lags our AAU peers. Moreover, we are slowly falling behind.

990970 988 990 991

1102 1104 1109 1110 1115

800

900

1,000

1,100

1,200

1,300

1,400

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

UO AAU Public Average

1220

1328

1210

1333

1219

1336

1230

1344

1218

1350

Page 19: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

65.3%

75.2%

65.9%

83.4%

70.0%

83.4%

67.8%

84.4%

65.8%

84.9%

63.4%

74.8%

Oregon 6-Year Rate AAU Public 6-Year Rate

Oregon 4-Year Rate AAU Public 4-Year Rate

4-year and 6-year graduation rates.

Page 20: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

6-year graduation rates again.

Six-Year Graduation Rate 2010-111University of Virginia-Main Campus 93.9%2University of California-Berkeley 90.5%3University of California-Los Angeles 90.0%4University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 89.5%5University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 89.0%6Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus 86.7%7University of California-San Diego 85.3%8University of California-Irvine 84.6%9University of Florida 83.7%

10University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 82.5%11University of Wisconsin-Madison 82.0%12University of Maryland-College Park 81.8%13University of California-Davis 81.7%14The University of Texas at Austin 80.9%15Texas A & M University 80.7%16Ohio State University-Main Campus 79.9%17University of California-Santa Barbara 79.8%18University of Washington-Seattle Campus 79.6%19Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus 78.9%20University of Pittsburgh-Main Campus 78.7%21Rutgers University-New Brunswick/Piscataway 77.4%22Michigan State University 77.3%23Indiana University-Bloomington 72.0%24SUNY at Buffalo 71.1%25University of Iowa 70.8%26University of Minnesota-Twin Cities 70.2%27University of Missouri-Columbia 68.9%28University of Colorado at Boulder 68.1%29Purdue University-Main Campus 68.1%30Iowa State University 67.5%31Stony Brook University 67.0%32University of Oregon 65.8%33University of Arizona 61.4%34University of Kansas Main Campus 60.7%

UO

OUS Peers

Page 21: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011$K

$50K

$100K

$150K

$200K

$250K

$83$91

$100$114 $118

$172 $178 $185$200

$211

University of Oregon AAU Public Average

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011$K

$50K

$100K

$150K

$200K

$250K

$300K

Research Expenditures per Faculty Member

In absolute dollars, UO spends less on research than any other AAU public. But in terms of dollars per faculty UO looks much better and is making important strides forward.

AAU Percentiles for research expenditures per faculty= Oregon

Page 22: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Books Books normed x 10000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

University of Oregon AAU Publics

Citations Citations normed x 10000

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

University of Oregon AAU Publics

Awards Awards normed x 10000

100

200

300

400

500

600

University of Oregon AAU Publics

Faculty Research Impact

Books: UO faculty, on the average, produce more scholarly books than their average AAU peers.

Citations: UO average number of citations per faculty lags the AAU average.

Honors and Awards – UO faculty, on the average, receive their fare share of honors and awards

Source: Academic Analytics, 2010

Page 23: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-110

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

32 3335 35 35

21 22 22 23 24

University of Oregon AAU Public Average

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-110

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,0006,243 6,013

5,6355,910 5,813

3,849 3,876 3,912 4,066 4,225

University of Oregon AAU Public Average

Student – Tenure Line Faculty ratios

UO faculty are serving 50% more students than their peers at AAU public institutions.

Bachelor Degrees awarded per Tenure Line Faculty

On the average, UO faculty are producing far more bachelors degrees than their peers at public AAU institutions.

Page 24: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Ph.D. ProductionNumber of PhD’s granted per tenure related faculty (x 1000)

Source: IPEDS

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-110

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

285

250

282255

226

336 347 342 334349

UO AAU Public Average

Axi

s Tit

le

Page 25: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Numbers of high-rank PhD programs.As of 2012, UO has 9 Ph.D. programs in the top 20% of all similar Ph.D. programs in high research universities, as determined by faculty research productivity:

Mathematics (N=166)Special Education (N=62)

0 25 50 75 100

UO Percentile Rank AAU Public Median Percentile Rank

Source: Academic Analytics

Page 26: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011$K

$10K

$20K

$30K

$40K

$50K

$60K

$70K

$25,017 $26,628 $28,341 $28,820 $29,400 $29,532

$54,541$57,589

$60,889 $60,541 $59,303 $61,344

University of Oregon AAU Public Average

FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011$K

$10K

$20K

$30K

$40K

$50K

$60K

$70K

$80K

$90K

Total Expenditures per Student

The UO spends less per student than any of the other 33 public AAU Universities, well less than half of the average, and we are falling behind.

Page 27: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Total Expenditures per Student

With 25,000 student FTE, the UO would need to spend an additional $44,500,000 to move to 31st place on this list.

Total Expenditures Excl. Hosp Svcs and Ind Ops per Stu FTE 2010-111University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill $86,337 2University of California-Los Angeles $86,231 3University of California-San Diego $70,710 4University of Washington-Seattle Campus $63,174 5University of Wisconsin-Madison $62,815 6University of Michigan-Ann Arbor $62,781 7University of California-Davis $60,547 8Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus $54,916 9University of Minnesota-Twin Cities $54,750

10University of California-Berkeley $54,551 11University of Iowa $51,512 12University of Virginia-Main Campus $50,590 13The University of Texas at Austin $50,036 14University of California-Irvine $49,744 15University of Florida $49,127 16Rutgers University-New Brunswick/Piscataway $46,767 17University of Maryland-College Park $44,363 18Texas A & M University $44,016 19University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign $42,861 20University of Arizona $42,750 21Stony Brook University $42,021 22Michigan State University $42,005 23Ohio State University-Main Campus $39,709 24University of Kansas Main Campus $39,090 25University of Missouri-Columbia $38,560 26Purdue University-Main Campus $37,792 27University of Colorado at Boulder $35,784 28University of California-Santa Barbara $34,296 29Iowa State University $33,627 30SUNY at Buffalo $32,459 31Indiana University-Bloomington $31,312 32University of Oregon $29,532

data for remaining schools unavailable

UO

OUS Peers

Page 28: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011$M

$20M$40M$60M$80M

$100M$120M$140M$160M$180M$200M

$71

$101$88

$100

$121

$93

$154$168

$190

$167 $166$177

University of Oregon AAU Public Average

FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY20110.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.14

0.20

0.16 0.160.19

0.14

0.10 0.10 0.110.09 0.08 0.09

University of Oregon AAU Public Average

Annual Giving

In most years, gifts to UO are close to half the average of our AAU peers.

But annual giving should be understood relative to the size of the institution – for example in terms of financial size. Considering annual giving as a percentage of total annual expenditures UO looks much better.

Source: Council for Aid to Education, Voluntary Support of Education Survey

Annual giving normalized by total annual expenditures

Page 29: Academic Planning Benchmarks and Metrics December 10, 2013 and January 14, 2014

Data Sources

• IPEDS – Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System• AAUDE – Association of American Universities Data Exchange• Academic Analytics – a benchmarking platform• Council for Aid to Education• Delaware Study of Costs and Productivity