absorção co²
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
1/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Absorption of CO2by AqueousDiethanolamine Solutions in aVortex Tube Gas-LiquidContactor and Separator
Participants:
INEEL: Daniel S. Wendt,
(208-526-3996, [email protected])
Michael G. Mc Kellar(208-526-1346, [email protected])
Anna K. Podgorney
Douglas E. Stacey
Terry D. TurnerConocoPhillips Canada:
Kevin T. Raterman
May 6, 2003Supported by U.S. DOE (DESupported by U.S. DOE (DE--AC07AC07--99ID13727)99ID13727)
ParticipantsPoster PresentationsPlenary SessionsTechnical SessionsMain Menu
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
2/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Project Objectives: Low capital cost due to compact, simple design
High CO2capture efficiency high efficiency mass transfer
reduced solvent regeneration requirements
Operationally flexible
turn-down & scale-up with parallel design
easily accommodates variable flow rates and gas
compositions
low maintenance/portable configuration Works equally well for physical / chemical absorbents
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
3/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Jet type absorbers highly efficientReactor Type kl a ( s-1 x 100)
Packed tower 7
Sieve plate 40
Venturi reactor 25
Bubble column 24
Impinging jet 122
(Herskowits et. al.)
High Shear Jet Absorber
highly turbulent... large interfacial
area for mass transfer
multiple jets impingement zonecreates secondary drop breakup / greater area for mass transfer
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
4/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
High Efficiency Absorption. acid gas separation Co-inject chemical or physical absorbent
COCO22 + 2R+ 2R22NHNH RR22NCOONCOO-- + R+ R22NHNH22++
RR22NCOONCOO-- + H+ H22OO RR22NH + HCONH + HCO33
--
R designatesR designatesCC22HH44--OHOH
Mass transfer rate ~ f(interfacial area, film thickness) Vortex tube
high differential gas-liquid acceleration - small drops
high turbulence - small film thickness GOAL achieve near equilibrium acid gas loading
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
5/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Vortex Tube with Liquid Separator
Lorey, et. al., 1998
Cool
Gas
Outlet
8 atm2 C
Gas Inlet
12.6 atm
9 CHot Gas Outlet
8.6 atm
7 C
Liquid
Outlet
J-T Temperature = 5 C
Joule-Thomson expansion
near sonic to supersonic velocity
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
6/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Scaled Contactor Process-wellhead (~Mscfd) to full gas plant (~MMscfd)-distributed engine (~Mscfd) to centralized power plant (~MMscfd)
Flash
Feed CO2 MixCO2
CO2
StripperAbsorbent
Clean Gas
Parallel VortexContactors
(Heat Regeneration if needed)Simple Process Schematic
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
7/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Vortex Contactor
Separator TubeSeparator TubeNozzleNozzle
Boroscope / Throttle
Vortex ContactorVortex Contactor
Gas Exit
Liquid inlet
Gas Inlet
Liquid Exit
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
8/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Contactor Prototype
60 SLPM @ 100 psia inlet
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
9/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Gas - Liquid Loading Tests
Achieve >95% gas-liquid separation for
stoichiometric loading of a 15% volume CO2mixture
Design parameters
vortex inlet
tube design
tapered & slotted stepped with holes
tube length
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
10/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Stepped tube design exceedsgas/liquid separation target
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm3/minute)
Gas/Liq
uidSeparationEfficiency
(%)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Liqui
d/GasRatio(massbasis)
Separation Efficiency
Liquid/Gas Ratio
Inlet Pressure @ 100 psia
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
11/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Stepped tube design exceedsgas/liquid separation target
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm3/minute)
Liqu
idOutletFlow
(cm3/min)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Liquid/GasRatio(ma
ssbasis)
liquid side
gas side
L/G
Inlet Pressure @ 100 psia
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
12/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
CO2/DEA Baseline Test Apparatus
CO2supply
N2supply
Reg Reg
CO2 FlowController
N2 FlowController
P
T
T P
Gas
Chromato-graph
P
P
Flowmeter
Liquid
T
Exit HighFlow
Exit LowFlow
TescomCheck Valve
Tescom
Liquid Pump
LiquidCollect-
ionVessel
LiquidCoalescer
VacuumPump
Hood
Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Vortex Tube
Air InletPress.
Air Inlet
Temp.
Hot AirOutletTemp.
Hot ExitPress.
LiquidOutletTemp
LiquidInlet
Press.
ExitPress.
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
13/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
CO2/DEA Baseline Testing Operation
Operating Parameters
100-500 cm3
/min liquid flow rate 15-50 wt% liquid DEA composition
80-200 psig inlet gas pressure
5-15 mol% inlet gas CO2composition
25-75 slpm inlet gas flow rate (dependent variable)
Solvent loading and CO2capture efficiency unsatisfactory in
baseline testing
Diagnostic testing indicated increased residence time required process modifications necessary
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
14/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Process Modifications Modifications to process hardware
increase gas-liquid contact time capacity to adjust the gas-liquid contactor geometric configuration
maintain ability to control the inlet gas pressure and CO2 : DEA
feed stream mole ratio
Modifications to process operating parameters
75-350 cm3/min liquid flow rate
30 wt% liquid DEA composition
70 slpm inlet gas flow rate 10 mol% inlet gas CO2composition
170-250 psig inlet gas pressure (dependent variable)
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
15/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Baseline and Modified Process
Configurations
CO2supply
N2supply
Reg Reg
CO2 FlowController
N2 FlowController
P
T
T P
Gas
Chromato-graph
P
P
Flowmeter
Liquid
T
Exit HighFlow
Exit LowFlow
TescomCheck Valve
Tescom
Liquid Pump
LiquidCollect-
ionVessel
LiquidCoalescer
VacuumPump
Hood
Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Vortex Tube
Air InletPress.
Air Inlet
Temp.
Hot AirOutletTemp.
Hot ExitPress.
LiquidOutletTemp
LiquidInlet
Press.
ExitPress.
CO2
supply
N2
supply
Reg Reg
CO2 Flow
Controller
N2 FlowController
P
T
T P
GasChromato-
graph
P
P
Flowmeter
LiquidSupply
T
Exit HighFlow
Exit LowFlow
Check Valve
Liquid Pump
LiquidCollect-
ionVessel
LiquidCoalescer
VacuumPump
Hood
Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Air InletPress.
Air InletTemp.
Hot Air
OutletTemp.
Hot Exit
Press.
LiquidOutlet
Temp
LiquidInlet
Press.
ExitPress.
Contactor
TescomBack Press.Regulator
TescomBack Press.
Regulator
Modified
Contactor/
Separator
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
16/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Inlet gas pressure as a function ofliquid flow rateFouling is caused by deposits accumulating in the vortex tube nozzles
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm3/minute)
InletGasPress
ure(psia)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm 3/minute)
InletGasPress
ure(psia)
No Nozzle Fouling Nozzle Fouling Present
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
17/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
CO2capture efficiency as functionof liquid flow rate
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm3/minute)
CO
2CaptureEfficien
cy(%)
Modified Configuration 1
Modified Configuration 2
Modified Configuration 3
Modified Configuration 4
Modified Configuration 5
Modified Configuration 6
Modified Configuration 7
Modified Configuration 8
Modified Configuration 9
Mo dified Co nfiguration 10
Mo dified Co nfiguration 11
Mo dified Co nfiguration 12
30 wt%DEA, 10%C O2, 90 p sig
15wt%DEA, 10%CO2, 90 psig
30 wt%DEA, 10%C O2, MAX p sig
50wt%DEA, 10%C O2, 100 ps ig
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
18/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
CO2capture efficiency as functionof liquid flow rate (no fouling)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm 3/minute )
CO
2CaptureEfficien
cy(%)
Modified Configuration 1
Modified Configuration 2
Modified Configuration 9
Mo dified Co nfiguration 10
Mo dified Co nfigurat ion 11
Mo dified Co nfigurat ion 12
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
19/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
CO2capture efficiency as functionof liquid flow rate (fouling present)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm3/minute)
CO
2CaptureEfficiency(%)
Mo dified C onfiguration 3
Mo dified C onfiguration 4
Mo dified Co nfiguration 5
Mo dified Co nfiguration 6
Mo dified Co nfiguration 7
Mo dified C onfiguration 8
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
20/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Solvent loading as function ofliquid flow rate
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm3/minute)
SolventLoading[moleCO
2/moleDEA] Modified Configurat ion 1
Modified Configurat ion 2
Modified Configurat ion 3
Modified Configurat ion 4
Modified Configurat ion 5
Modified Configurat ion 6
Modified Configurat ion 7
Modified Configurat ion 8
Modified Configurat ion 9
Modifie d Conf igura t ion 10
Modifie d Configura t ion 11
Modifie d Configura t ion 12
30wt % DEA, 10% CO2, 9 0 psig
15wt% DEA, 10% CO2, 90 psig
30wt % DEA, 10% CO2, MAX psig
50wt% DEA, 10% CO2, 100 psig
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
21/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Solvent loading as function ofliquid flow rate (no fouling)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm3/minute)
Solvent
Loading[moleCO
2/moleDEA]
Modified Configuration 1
Modified Configuration 2
Modified Configuration 9
Mo dified Co nfiguration 10
Mo dified Co nfiguration 11
Mo dified Co nfiguration 12
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
22/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Solvent loading as function ofliquid flow rate (fouling present)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Inlet Liquid Flow Rate (cm3/minute)
Solvent
Loading[moleCO
2/moleDEA]
Modified Configuration 3Modified Configuration 4
Modified Configuration 5
Modified Configuration 6
Modified Configuration 7
Modified Configuration 8
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
23/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Conclusions Gas/Liquid separation efficiencies in excess of 95%
Non-optimized vortex tube testing has resulted incarbon dioxide capture efficiencies of up to 86%
Solvent loading as high as 0.49 moles CO2/mole
DEA
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
24/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
Future Research/Applications Process hardware optimization
Scaled contactor and separator Additional solvents
Additional CO2applications
H2S
-
7/27/2019 Absoro CO
25/25
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory
References Herskowits,D.; Herskowits,V.; Stephan, K .; Tamir. A.: Characterization of a two-phase
impinging jet absorber. II. Absorption with chemical reaction of CO2 in NaOH solutions.
Chem. Eng. Science 45 (1990) 1281-1287
Lorey, M., Steinle, J., Thomas, K. 1998. Industrial Application of Vortex Tube Separation
Technology Utilizing the Ranque-Hilsch Effect, presented at the 1998 SPE European
Petroleum Conference, The Hague, Netherlands, October 20-22.
Chakma, A., Chornet, E., Overend, R. P., and Dawson, W. H., Absorption of CO2by
Aqueous Diethanolamine (DEA) Solutions in a High Shear Jet Absorber, The Canadian
Journal of Chemical Engineering, Volume 68, August 1990. Lee, J. I., Otto, F. D., and Mather, A. E., Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous
Diethanolamine Solutions at High Pressures, Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data,
Vol. 17, No. 4, 1972.