a study on quality worklife of employees in kumadam publications pvt
TRANSCRIPT
A STUDY ON QUALITY WORKLIFE OF
EMPLOYEES IN KUMADAM
PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD.
CHENNAI.
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
DHINESHKUMAR. D
(Reg. No.098001604009)
In partial fulfillment for the award of the degree
Of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
IN
GNANAMANI COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
PACHAL, NAMAKKAL – 637 018
MAY - JUNE - 2011
GNANAMANI COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
PACHAL, NAMAKKAL – 637 018
Department of Management studies
PROJECT WORK
MAY - JUNE - 2011
This is to certify that the project entitled
A STUDY ON QUALITY WORKLIFE OF EMPLOYEES
IN KUMADAM PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD.
AT CHENNAI.
is the bonafide record of project work done by
DHINESHKUMAR. D
Register no: 098001604009
Of MBA (Master of Business Administration) during the year 2010 - 2011
---------------------- ---------------------------- Project Guide Head of the Department
Submitted for the Project Viva- Voce examination held on
---------------------- --------------------------
Internal Examiner External Examiner
DECLARATION
I affirm that the Project work titled ‘ A Study on Quality
worklife of employees in Kumudam Publications at chennai’ being
submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of Master of Business
Administration (MBA) is the original work carried out by me. It has not
formed the part of any other project work submitted for award of any
degree, either in this or any other university.
---------------------------------
Signature of the student (DHINESHKUMAR. D)
(098001604009)
I certify that the declaration made above by the student is true
---------------------------------
Signature of the guide (R. NIRMALA RANI) Head, Department of MBA
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my heartful gratitude and thanks to Dr. T. ARANGANNAL,
Chairman, and Smt. P. MALALEENA chairperson of GNANAMANI
COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, Namakkal who provide all the facilities
and necessary encouragement during the course of the study.
I ever remain our PRINCIPAL DR.V.BASKARAN GNANAMANI
COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, Namakkal for granting me the permission
to carry out my project work.
I wish to convey my sincere and Heartful thanks to my Head of the
Department and Guide R. NIRMALA RANI, GNANAMANI COLLEGE
OF TECHNOLOGY, Namakkal for her constant encouragement and
valuable support through out the study.
Above all expresses my sincere thanks to my parents who provide all
the necessities in ensuring my successful completion of the project.
----------------------------
(DHINESHKUMAR. D)
CONTENTS
Chapter No. TITLE Page No.
I INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY 1-21
1.1 Stress 1
1.2 Scope of the study 17
1.3 Objective of the study 18
1.4 Research Methodology 19-20
1.5 Limitations of the study 21
II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 22-24
III INDUSTRY PROFILE 25-28
COMPANY PROFILE 29-32
3.1Functions of various departments 30
3.2 Organization Chart 32
IV DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 33-58
V FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS 59-63
VI CONCLUSION 64
VII BIBLIOGRAPHY 65
VIII ANNEXURE 66-68
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF TABLES
SL.NOTITLE
PAGE.NO.
1 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 33
2 Distribution of the respondents according to marital status
34
3 Distribution of respondents according to their educational qualification
35
4 Distribution of the respondents according to experience 36
5 Distribution of respondents according to their work before office time
37
6 Distribution of respondents according to their work after office time
38
7 Distribution of respondents according to their office work at home
39
8 Distribution of respondents according to their work during lunch break
40
9 Distribution of respondents according to their wake up 41
10 Distribution of respondents according to their resting time
42
11 Distribution of respondents according to solve the problems related to work without anybodies help
43
12 Distribution of respondents according to lie awake at night thinking of the next days work
44
13 Distribution of respondents according to always insist on perfection in the quality of work done
45
14 Distribution of respondents according to feel that organization problems are your own
46
15 Distribution of respondents according to training and expertise are utilized in your present role
47
16 Distribution of respondents according to enjoy their role very much
48
17 Distribution of respondents according to the power to take decisions in their role
49
18 Distribution of respondents according to communicate frankly with their immediate supervisor
50
19 Distribution of respondents according to meet the expectations of their boss
51
20 Distribution of respondents according to employees who don’t spend much time with their family
52
21 Distribution of respondents according to employees who have heavy work load
53
22 Distribution of respondents according to employees who are not clear about the expectations of their role
54
LIST OF CHARTS
LIST OF CHARTS
SL.NOTITLE
PAGE.NO.
1 Distribution of the respondents according to gender 33
2 Distribution of the respondents according to marital status
34
3 Distribution of respondents according to their educational qualification
35
4 Distribution of the respondents according to experience 36
5 Distribution of respondents according to their work before office time
37
6 Distribution of respondents according to their work after office time
38
7 Distribution of respondents according to their office work at home
39
8 Distribution of respondents according to their work during lunch break
40
9 Distribution of respondents according to their wake up 41
10 Distribution of respondents according to their resting time
42
11 Distribution of respondents according to solve the problems related to work without anybodies help
43
12 Distribution of respondents according to lie awake at night thinking of the next days work
44
13 Distribution of respondents according to always insist on perfection in the quality of work done
45
14 Distribution of respondents according to feel that organization problems are your own
46
15 Distribution of respondents according to training and 47
expertise are utilized in your present role
16 Distribution of respondents according to enjoy their role very much
48
17 Distribution of respondents according to the power to take decisions in their role
49
18 Distribution of respondents according to communicate frankly with their immediate supervisor
50
19 Distribution of respondents according to meet the expectations of their boss
51
20 Distribution of respondents according to employees who don’t spend much time with their family
52
21 Distribution of respondents according to employees who have heavy work load
53
22 Distribution of respondents according to employees who are not clear about the expectations of their role
54
CHAPTER-I
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER-I
INTRODUCTION
What is stress?
Stress can be defined as the physiological and psychological reaction
which occurs as consequence of perception of an imbalance between the level
of demand placed upon individuals and their capabilities to meet those
demands. Stress relates to the causes and consequences of less than optimum
performance which is attributable to motivation. Such level of motivation by its
nature or its intensity is inappropriate to the work being performed and
personality and abilities of the individual concerned.
Stress is basically the impact of one object on another. Industrialization
increase in the scale of operations in the society is causing increasing stresses.
Stress is a person’s adaptive response to a stimulus that places excessive
psychological or physical demand on the person. It can be caused by many
factors. Major organizational stressors are task demand, physical demand and
role demand. Stress can affect performance and attitudes or cause withdrawal.
It is anything that changes our physical, emotional or mental state encountering
various stimuli in the environment. Two important individuals differences
related to stress are hardiness and optimism. Hardiness is s person’s ability to
cope with stress. People with hardly personalities have an internal locus of
control, are strongly conceited to the activities in their lives, and view change
as an opportunity for advancement and growth.
People with low hardiness may have more difficulties in coping with
pressure to stress. Optimism is the extent to which a person sees life in positive
or negative terraces. Optimistic people handle stress better. They will be able to
see the positive side of the situation and recognize that things may eventually
improve.
1
Less optimistic people may focus more on the negative side of the
situation and expect things to get worse and not better. Many things can cause
stress. The two important categories are Organizational stressors and Life
stressors. Organizational stressors are factors in the work place that can cause
stress. Four general sets of organizational stressors are task demand, physical
demand, role demand and interpersonal demand.
Some of the consequences of stress have been identified as:
Reduced productivity
Lack of creativity
Job dissatisfaction
Increased sick leave
Premature retirement
Absenteeism
Accidents
Organizational breakdown
There are many ways in which organizational culture will manifest itself
in a dysfunctional way. For example, the unhelpful and dysfunctional division
between 'us' and ‘them’, this may be perpetuated, by both senior managers and
employees. A division which results in a lack of proper communication and a
sort of 'blaming' culture.
Addressing these matters is difficult work, work that cannot be
adequately dealt with by employees or internal consultants because they are
part of the culture; part of the hierarchy, and subject to the authority structure
of the organization.
2
Such a strategy would address the following sort of issues:
Level Aims Responsibility
1 Treat casualties Occupational Health Professionals
2 Detect other cases Employees/Occupational Health Professionals
3 Increase awareness Employees, Training, Occupational Health
4 Teach Skills Training, Occupational Health
5 Improve Culture Senior Management Team
The first four actions are as essential as the last. These can all be
developed by internal staffs that have the knowledge, skills and ability to
ensure that what is provided is as good as anywhere else. There may be benefit
from employing outside assistance to consult to the process but basically the
experts in the field are in the organization.
Stress Management for Organizations
Stress can be an issue for anyone, and at any time. It can be painful and
performance limiting to the most junior recruit to the most experienced senior
executive. Stress is defined by the Brown “as occurring when pressures exceed
the resources of an individual to cope effectively”.
Stress is now the largest single cause of sickness absence in the UK. It
has become a modern epidemic. If unmanaged in can lead to long-term
absence, industrial tribunals and personal injury claims. There is a strong
financial driver for any organization to better manage stress, along with the
added incentive of protecting its reputation.
3
Organizational Stress Management
Organizational Stress Management aims at preventing and reducing
stress for both the individual employee and the organization or company. The
Training Package offers you eight detailed sessions for stress management
training groups in your workplace. These include eight relaxation exercises on
audiocassette tapes, together with training in relaxation, breathing and
cognitive-behavioral techniques. We also provide practical training in the
management of many workplace stressors. The Stress Management sessions
provide employees with the opportunity to tackle major stressors using
techniques from Problem Solving Therapy. We also provide research notes
with each session giving you in-depth background information on the problems
of work-pace stress, together with step-by-step presentations of related
therapies of particular value in the treatment of stress at work.
If you have a look at the typical symptoms of stressed people within a
working organization it is not difficult to see why high performance relates
closely to a low stress, happy atmosphere. Removing stress has to be a priority
if you really want your organization to succeed.
Organizational stressors may be due to any of the following causes:
Intrasender conflict: This occurs when the same person sends
conflicting messages.
Intrarole conflict: This occurs when different people have different
expectations about what a role incumbent should do. This type of
conflict is also known as role expectations conflict.
Interrole conflict: This occurs when two roles held by one person are in
conflict. It is also known as interrole distance stress.
Person role conflict: This occurs when the personal attitudes or values
of the individual conflict with what is required from him in a particular
role. It is also known as self-role distance.
4
Role ambiguity: This may occur due to any of the following reasons:
1. Because the individual does not understand what is expected of
him/her.
2. Because the individual understands what is expected, but is
unclear as to how he/she will meet those expectations.
3. Because the individual’s perception of what he/she is being
expected to do by members of the role set.
Role overload: This occurs when the expectations and demands of the
job exceeds the ability or the perceived ability of the role incumbent.
Role overload can be either quantitative or qualitative. When a person is
required to do more work than is possible within the time allotted for the
job, it is known as quantitative overload. When a person thinks that
he/she does not have the abilities or skills to perform a particular job, is
known as qualitative overload or personal inadequacy.
Role underload: This occurs when the expectations and demands of the
jobs under utilize the ability of the role incumbent. Role under load like
role overload can be qualitative or quantitative. Qualitative role under
load occurs when the jobs that have to be done are not mentally
stimulating or challenging. Quantitative role under load occurs when a
person has little to do in the job.
Relationships at work: Relationship with colleagues (subordinates,
boss and peers) may be a source of occupational stress.
Roles stagnation: When a person wants to hold a role with a higher
responsibility but is stuck in the same role, this kind of stress results.
Organizational structure and climate: Organizational structure and
climate may sometimes acts as sources of work stress.
Home-office interface: Home-office interface can develop as a source
of stress for certain individuals.
5
Resource inadequacy: When the role occupant feels that he is not
provided with adequate resources such as material, man, money,
information etc needed for performing the functions assigned to him/
her.
Individual difference: Stress is not inheriting in a situation. Stress is
determined by whether the person perceives or interprets what is
happening as threatening.
Stress and delegation: When proper delegation is not done stress may
develop. The reasons why a employee fails to delegate may be the
following:
1. The employee would delegate more work, but the task he/she
delegate never seem to get done the way he/she wants them to be
done.
2. The employee feels that if he/she delegates he/she loses control.
3. He/she does not delegate much as his/her subordinates lack the
necessary experience.
4. He/she feels that he/she can do the task better than the person to
whom he/she may delegate.
Stressed and unproductive behavior that damages organizations
Stressed organizations are inflicted with a whole range of unproductive
behaviors including many of the following:
Unnecessary interpersonal conflicts that lead to obstruction and wasteful
turf wars,
Attachments to the current ways of doing things and therefore resistance
to change,
Prevarication that clouds issues and confuses priorities,
Procrastination in decision-making and implementation,
Chaotic activity and disorganizations, lack of focus
6
Absenteeism, now rife in the public sector and manufacturing,
Days off for genuine sickness
High staff turnover
Lethargy and slow working,
Resentments,
Disloyalty,
Secrecy,
Hidden agendas,
Hostility or resentfulness to the organization
Negativity towards both customers and fellow colleagues
Negativity or cynicism towards planning outcomes and management
Poor judgment with respect to both working relationships and planning
Clumsiness and accidents
Loss of focus and absent mindedness
Forgetfulness
High level of mistakes and consequent costly reworking
understand the situation, including causes and possible solutions;
provide support to the individual;
develop a plan to tackle the stressors/pressures (the causes of stress) that
is acceptable to all, particularly to the individual and their line
employees; and
Assess whether anyone else is experiencing problems and if a broader
organizational intervention is required.
The more stressed your organization is, the more of these sort of
behaviors and attitudes will be prevalent. As you can see, organizational stress
has an insidious effect on every significant personal transaction between staff
and management or staff and your clients and customers.
7
As a consequence, the above symptoms of stress directly influence
efficient operational functioning, high performance and productivity. This is
why good management is also good stress management pure and simple. In a
low-stress environment you can quite simply get a lot more done and in less
time.
10 Tips for employees to reduce organisational stress
Stress can prove a major headache for firms, leading to misunderstandings and
getting in the way of productivity. Dr Rosemary Anderson, chair of
International Stress Management Association UK gives some advice on how to
cut stress at work
Adopt the attitude that stress is not a weakness, and develop this
culture within your department.
Nobody’s perfect, we all have too much pressure from time to time, and stress
can affect anyone given an accumulation of circumstances. Foster the mindset
that it isn’t a weakness to seek help if you are not coping – it’s strength to
admit it and do something about it. Promote this as a developmental issue.
Handling stress is a proactive intervention to prevent ill health in your
employees and your organisation.
Ensure you are not suffering from stress yourself.
A stressed manager has a ‘knock-on effect’ throughout the organisation.
Dealing with your own stress will prevent your staff from suffering, and results
in a more relaxed and productive atmosphere.
Analyse your management style and behaviour.
Ask yourself (honestly) if this is causing any stress. Good management is the
best proactive way of reducing organisational stress.
8
A good employee:
- Ensures a realistic understanding of the workload and time it should take
- Sets individual work objectives and targets, and consult and discusses before
setting these
- Gives clear, effective instructions
- Makes sure he/she defines roles and tasks adequately – and discusses
priorities
- In times of high workload, prepares employees ahead
- Varies work where possible, and provides opportunities for individuals to
influence the way they do their jobs
- Delegates effectively, and not just the boring bits
- Which of these could you improve upon?
Ensure the working environment is suitable
They should make sure that there is not too much noise or overcrowding, for
example.
A poor working environment can cause employees a great deal of stress. While
this is sometimes impossible to change completely, many small things can be
done to improve the situation.
9
Help your staff to cope with change – no matter how big or how
small.
Before introducing a change, listen to the views of your staff. How will it be
for them?
Where possible, update employees on any changes taking place, and explain
the reasons for them.
Identify those who resist change and help them to accept it. Listen to doubts
and fears; explain, coach, boost self-esteem. Check how things are progressing
during and after change.
Improve communication.
Where possible, keep employees informed of all changes and major decisions.
Listen to your staff and hear what they are saying.
Talk to your staff informally and regularly. It will be easier for them to come to
you or for you to approach them if there’s a problem.
Observe your staff –you’ll learn a lot from watching.
Organizational stressors
An organization is composed of individuals and group and stressors may
also exist in organization at contact. There are macro level dimensions of
organizational functioning which may work as a stressor.
Organizational polices
Organizational policies, guidelines for actions unfavorable and
ambiguous polices may affect the functioning of the individual adversely and
they may experience stress.
10
The unfair and arbitrary performance evaluation, un realistic, job
description, frequent reallocation of activities, rotating work shifts, ambiguous
procedure, inflexible rule, inequality of incentives etc, work as stressors.
Organizational structure
It provides formal relationship among individuals in an organization.
The defect in organization structure like lack of opportunity of participation in
decision making, lack of opportunity for advancement, high degree of
specialization, excessive inter-dependence of various departments could lead to
staff conflict.
Organizational processors
It is also affects individuals behavior at work. Faculty organizational
process like poor communication, poor and inadequate feedback of work
performance and conflicting role, unfair control system cause stress for people
in the organization. Inadequate job stress is as condition arising from the
interaction of people and their jobs characterized by change within people that
force them to deviate from their normal functioning.
Physical condition
Organizational physical condition affects work performance. The poor
physical conditions like crowding and lack of privacy excessive notice,
excessive heat/cold, use of toxic chemicals and radiation, air pollution, safety
hazards, poor lighting etc., produce stress.
Interpersonal demand
A set of organizational stressors consist of three interpersonal demand
group pressure, leadership and interpersonal conflict. Group pressure may
include pressure to restrict output, pressure to conform to the group norms.
11
Organizational Consequences
PppPersonal Stressors
High achievement expectation
High organizational expectation
Level of job involvement
Organizational Stressors
Role Conflict
Role overload
Intensity of interpersonal interaction
Emotional exhaustion
Depersonalization
Feeling a lack of personal accomplishment
Behavioral Impact
Negative attitude
Fatigue
Frustration
Helplessness
Withdrawal from friends and social circles
Consequences of the Stress
The individual consequence of stress also affects the organization. The
adverse consequences in organization include low performance and
productivity and high rates of absenteeism and turnover. The stressors
experienced by employees who take on critical role and responsibilities could
result in faculty decision making which could in turn result in disruptions in
working relationship.
12
The twentieth century is often known as the “Age of stress” Incessant
wars have become the order of the day. Economic fluctuations and inflation
have taken this toll in unemployment, poverty and socio-political chaos. Urban
society with its high mobility disrupts friendships, weakens extended family
bonds, places increasing stocks on the home, Excessive competition and
impersonalization has resulted in dehumanization of values and ideas.
Executives from the level of managers are above all the people who
have much of the responsibility and authority to shape the organization
according to the marketing policies and procedures. It takes much effort to run
the show smoothly because human resources are complex in nature, to get
work done and to convince them of the importance of completing assignments
in time is no easy task and in this process tension and stress would be the
resultants. Once if the executives realize the factors that cause stress in their
work environment, they can prepare themselves to face them with much
confidence. So that they would be able to cope with it and make the
organizational environment a better place to work.
Industrial conflict is an endogenous component of the employer-
employee relationship. It may be defined as a situation in which the conditions,
practices or goals of the different parties are incompatible and the parties are
aware of this incompatibility. Public sector is the very basis of modern
civilization and is in fact the big employer of “Organized labour force” in the
country. The study of “stress” in the public sector becomes all the more
important because of the following reason.
The level of stress among executives and the factors contributing to
stress in the work environment was assessed during the organizational stress
questionnaire designed by the investigator.
13
The data was analyzed in view of different dimensions to get a better
understanding about the variable “stress”. To draw definite conclusions from
the collected data, the statistical tools such as mean, correlation and simple
percentage analysis have been used. Based on the results obtained, conclusion
regarding the level of stress and dominant factor contributing to stress in the
case of executives rule arrived at. A few recommendations are also given to
reduce the impact of organizational stress on the executives.
Man has made significant strides in the application of science and
technology. Unfortunately, advances in our understanding of human nature and
behavior have lagged far behind our advances in the physical and biological
sciences. We know much about the atom and the gene but not nearly enough
about love or the values needed for a meaningful and fulfilling life.
The stresses of modern life are indicated by the incredible amount of
tranquilizers and hot beverages consumed everyday in the society. The growing
number of heart attacks, suicide among youth, crime rate and increase in
prostitution are the obvious indices of contemporary stress. The incidence of
stress is also reflected in the widespread preoccupation with altered states of
consciousness as well as the ample literature on dehumanization and alienation.
Despite the stress of modern life most people manage through but for
many stresses prove detrimental. It is startling to note that emotional
disturbances incapacitate more people than all other health problems combined.
Emotional conflict and tension aggravates many kinds of organic illness.
In the initial, alarm stage, the body responds to the stressors by
mobilizing its defenses to deal with the threat. The state of resistance begins as
the body fights back. In the stage of exhaustion, the body no longer can stand
up and fight. Different people spend varied time in these stages.
14
Work stress may affect any employee, whether the employee is a
manager, or a worker, young or old. Almost any job condition can cause stress,
depending upon an employee’s reaction to it. There are, however, a number of
job conditions that frequently cause stress for employees.
The term “stress” is used in every day speech to refer broadly to the
process of copying with life’s pressures, problems and the negative feelings. In
today’s turbulent business environment, all ambitious and hard working
persons face constant problems and stress in their jobs and also in their
personal lives. Stress is an individual’s reaction to a disturbing factor in the
environment. The stress is said to be positive when the opportunity for one to
gain something. Stress is negative it can result in feelings of distrust, rejection,
anger and depression. In fact, excellence in any sphere of life is essentially
accompanied by stress. ‘Stress is a very bad master but a very good servant’.
“Stress” is defined as a non specific response of the body to any demand
upon it which result in symptoms such as rise in the blood pressures, release of
hormones, quickness of breathe, lightening of muscles, perspiration and
increased cardiac activity. Stress is not necessarily negative. Some stress keeps
as motivated and alert, while too little stress can create problems with mental
and physical health particularly over a prolonged period of time
Organizational stress has become a widely discussed problem in today’s
business world. In any organization and in any situation the employee
experiences stress in various forms. Stress can either help or hinder one’s
effectiveness depending upon the stress level.
Generally stress has negative consequence. However, stress which has
neutral connections: it is only the degree of stress, which produces positive or
negative consequence. Eustress denotes the presence of optimum level of stress
in an individual, which contribute positively to his performance.
15
Statement of the problem
Organizational stress has become a widely discussed problem in today’s
business world. In any organization and in any situation the employee
experiences stress in various forms. Stress can either help or hinder one’s
effectiveness depending upon the stress level. While analyzing the various
determinants of stress, it should be kept in mind that all employees do not get
the same degree of stress though they perform the same job in the same
environment and at the same time. An attempt has been made in this research
work to identify the organizational stress factors and its impact on job
performance of the employees.
Significance of the study
Generally, stress has negative consequences. However stress which has
neutral connection; it is only the degree of stress, which produces positive or
negative consequences. Eustress denote the presence of optimum level of stress
in an individual, which contribute positively to his performance. This may lead
working employees to view and better ways of doing their job. Distress denotes
the presence of high level of stress in an individual, which affects job
performance, is maximum, high level of stress causes physical, psychological
and behavioral problem. The employees may show dysfunctional behavior
because of stress of high level. In all these stress, organization is going to
suffer.
16
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
With the study, the researcher can bring about a clear picture about the
stress level among the employees in Kumudam Publications Pvt.ltd, Chennai.
The researcher can also state the areas in which the employees face lot of stress
and can also suggest the ways in which the employees can scope of stress in
those areas so that their day-to-day work is not disturbed.
17
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
General objective
To find out the strategies adopted by employees to manage stress.
Specific objectives
To identify the stressors in the area of work.
To examine whether there is any relation between age and stress.
To analyze whether there is any correlation between area of work and
stress.
Measures adopted by employees to counter stress.
To examine and analyze the ensuring factors influencing employees
stress.
18
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research
Research must be systematic and follow a series of steps and a rigid
standard protocol. These rules are broadly similar but may vary slightly
between the different fields of science.
Research Design
The research design used was Descriptive one. It narrates the whole
research in a simple manner.
Methodology
Field of study:
The study has been conducted at Aishweriya Rubber Products,
Coimbatore. The study seeks to find out the level of stress among
employees and the factors contributing to their stress.
Type of data:
Both primary and secondary data were used for the study.
Tools of data collection:
The methods used for collecting primary data were survey method
and interview method. Observation was not used for collecting data. Both
quantitative and qualitative data’s were collected. Secondary data were
collected from information gathered from the personnel’s working in the
company.
Sampling method:
Proportionate sampling method is used for choosing the sample size.
19
Sample size:
Total strength of the employees where 105. Out of 105 I had
collected 100 samples.
Tools for Data Analysis
The following stat ist ical tools were used for analysis of data:
Percentage Analysis Method
Chi-Square Test
Correlat ion Analysis
Percentage analysis method
With this method, i t is found out how much percentage is for
or against the part icular factor.
The formulae = Sample SizeX100 Total Sample Size
Chi-square
For large sample sizes, the sampling distribution of x2 can be
closely approximated by a continuous curve known as the chi – square
distribution
χ 2 = ∑ (O-E) 2
E
Correlation analysis
Correlation is a statistical device which helps us in analyzing the
co variation of two or more variables. The effect of correlation is to
reduce the range of uncertainty. The prediction based on correlation
analysis is likely to be more valuable and near to reality.
∑ xy r =
√∑x 2 * √∑y 2
20
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
LIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH
Focusing only on employees, assuming that stress is higher at
employee’s level.
The period of the study is limited to 13 days and based on this period
the functioning of the departments is assessed.
Since the findings are mostly based on the information given by the
participants, there is every possibility of lacking precision for the
findings of the study.
21
CHAPTER-II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
CHAPTER-II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Behaviour in Organisation (Page no: 245)
According to Baron (1983), define occupational stress as "A condition
arising from the interaction of people and their jobs and characterized by
changes within people that force them to deviate from their normal
functioning."
Stress Management (Page no: 142)
According to Miles and Perreault (1976) identify four different types
of role conflict: 1. Intra-sender role conflict 2. Inter sender role conflict. 3.
Person- role conflict; 4. Role over load. The use of role concepts suggests that
job related stress is associated with individual, interpersonal, and structural
variables (Katz and Kahn, 1978; Whetten, 1978). The presence of supportive
peer groups and supportive relationships with super visors are negatively
correlated with R.C. (Caplan et al., 1964)
Employee participation of occupational stress (Page no: 213)
According to Srivastava and Sehgal (1984), the study revealed that
employees who maintained high work motivation experienced significantly
lower occupational role stress. Such as overload, role ambiguity and conflict,
unreasonable group and political pressures, responsibility for persons, for peer
relations, strenuous working conditions and non-profitability as compared to
low in the employees.
22
Organizational stress (Page no: 139)
According to Vansell, Brief, and Schuler (1993) stress is often
developed when an individual is assigned a major responsibility without proper
authority and delegation of power. Interpersonal factors such as group
cohesiveness, functional dependence, communication frequency, relative
authority and organisational distance between the role sender and the focal
persons are important topics in organisational behavior.
A resource pack for management, training and development (Page no: 284)
According to Doherty, N. and Tyson, S. (1998) mental well-being in
the workplace describes the four main approaches that organisations can
adopt to deal with stress problems. Includes a self-assessment exercise to help
managers identify which of their behaviors are likely to cause pressure to their
team, a well-being improvement model and a checklist for organisational
well-being.
An introductory guide for managers, supervisors and employees (Page no: 75)
According to Janet Cahill, Ph.D., Department of psychology, Rowan
college of New Jersey, Paul A. Landsbergis, Ed.D., M.P.H., Hypertension
Center, Cornell University Medical College, Peter L. Schnall, M.D., M.P.H
Center for social Epidemiology – presented at the Work Stress and Health’95
Conference. September 1995, Washington D.C. Making Changes in your
workplace to reduce stress.
23
A survey of employees and workplace stress (Page no: 198)
According to Wheatley, R. (2000) taking the strain examines the
relationship between stress and pressure, highlights the observable signs of
stress that a manager should be aware of and describes the key causes of stress
at work, including organisational culture and organisational change.
Stress and its Management Vol. 47(Page no: 58)
According to Bhadrapada, (1922) stress pressure help to avoid error,
completion of task in limited time, work overload, demanding and insensitive
section commander and unplanned workers are a few examples of
organisational factors. Poor inter-personnel relationship and lack of support
from colleagues can cause considerable stress especially among persons with
high social need.
Organisational stressors and job stress among employees (Page no: 162)
According to Kumaresan, S. Nasurdin, Aizzat Mohd, Ramayah. T.
(July 1, 2005) Singapore Management Review: The purpose of this paper is to
determine the influence of organisational variables (conflict, blocked career,
alienation, work overload, and unfavorable work environment) on job stress
among managers and to examine whether this relationship varies according to
the individual's level of neuroticism. Analysis of responses using hierarchical
regression revealed that three of the five organisational variables (conflict,
blocked career, and alienation) had significant positive effects on job stress.
Neuroticism was found to moderate the effects of the three organisational
stressors (alienation, work overload, and unfavorable work environment) on
job stress.
24
CHAPTER-III
INDUSTRIAL PROFILE & COMPANY PROFILE
CHAPTER-III
HISTORY OF INDUSTRY
Early news publications of world
Before the advent of the newspaper, there were two major kinds of periodical
news publications: the handwritten news sheet, and single item news publications.
These existed simultaneously.
The Roman Empire published Acta Diurna, or government announcement
bulletins, around 59 BC, as ordered by Julius Caesar. They were carved in metal or
stone and posted in public places.
In China, early government-produced news sheets, called tipao, circulated
among court officials during the late Han dynasty (second and third centuries AD).
Between 713 and 734, the Kaiyuan Za Bao ("Bulletin of the Court") of the Chinese
Tang Dynasty published government news; it was handwritten on silk and read by
government officials. In 1582 there was the first reference to privately published
newssheets in Beijing, during the late Ming Dynasty;
The increased cross-border interaction in early capitalist Europe created a
rising need for information which was met by concise handwritten newssheets. In
1556, the government of Venice first published the monthly Notizie scritte, which cost
one gazetta..
Single event news publications were printed in the broadsheet format, which
was often posted. These publications also appeared as pamphlets and small booklets
(for longer narratives, often written in a letter format), often containing woodcut
illustrations. Literacy rates were low in comparison to today, and these news
publications were often read aloud (literacy and oral culture were, in a sense, existing
side by side in this scenario).Sixteenth century Germany also saw subscription-based,
handwritten news. Those who subscribed to these publications were generally low-
level government officials and also merchants.
25
Newspapers
Title page of Carolus' Relation from 1609, the earliest newspaper
The term newspaper became common in the 17th century, however in
Germany, publications that we would today consider to be newspaper publications,
were appearing as early as the sixteenth century. They were discernibly newspapers
for the following reasons: they were printed, dated, appeared at regular and frequent
publication intervals, and included a variety of news items (unlike single item news
mentioned above). The first newspaper however was said to be the Strasbourg
Relation, in the early seventeenth century. German newspapers, like avisis, were
organized by the location from which they came, and by date. They differed from
avisis in the following manners: they employed a distinct and highly illustrated title
page, and they applied an overall date to each issue.
The German-language Relation aller Fürnemmen und gedenckwürdigen
Historien, printed from 1605 onwards by Johann Carolus in Strasbourg, is often
recognized as the first newspaper. At the time, Strasbourg was a free imperial city in
the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation; the first newspaper of modern
Germany was the Avisa, published in 1609 in Wolfenbüttel.
Other early papers include:
The first English-language newspaper, Corrant out of Italy, Germany, etc.,
was published in Amsterdam in 1620. A year and a half later, Corante, or weekely
newes from Italy, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Bohemia, France and the Low
Countreys. was published in England by an "N.B." (generally thought to be either
Nathaniel Butter or Nicholas Bourne) and Thomas Archer. The first newspaper in
France was published in 1631, La Gazette (originally published as Gazette de
France). Merkuriusz Polski Ordynaryjny was published in Kraków, Poland in 1661.
The first successful English daily, The Daily Courant, was published from 1702 to
1735.
26
News was frequently highly selective: rulers would often use them as ways to
publish accounts of battles or events that made those rulers look good to the public.
Sensationalist material was also printed, such as accounts of magic or of natural
disasters; this material did not pose a threat to the state, because it did not pose
criticism of the state. Printers readily printed sensationalist material, because they
faced a ready market, which proved lucrative for them. Material was selective, as
stated above, however printers found that there was a market for news about rulers
that did not cast those rulers in a favorable light, and printed this material.
British newspapers
Main article: History of British newspapers
The coranto form influenced British newspapers. On 7 November 1665, The
London Gazette (at first called The Oxford Gazette) began publication.[12] It is
considered to be the newspaper that decisively changed the look of English news
printing, echoing the coranto format of two columns, a clear title, and a clear date. It
was published twice a week.[13] Other English papers started to publish three times a
week, and later the first daily papers emerged. This was partly due to in the postal
system between Dover and London.
British magazines
The Gentleman's Magazine, first published in 1731, in London, is considered
to have been the first general-interest magazine. Edward Cave, who edited The
Gentleman's Magazine under the pen name "Sylvanus Urban", was the first to use the
term "magazine", on the analogy of a military storehouse of varied materiel,
originally derived from the Arabic makhazin "storehouses".
English Newspapers in Indian subcontinent
A British man William Bolts in 1766 offered the first ever paper to his fellow
countrymen in Calcutta and helped them establish a printing press. Since he was
against the East India Company Government.
27
Industrial Revolution
Newspapers of that time were in English and the news only related to British
activity in India. As the readers were also British, the local population was not the
target. But the Company feared that these Indian papers could get to England and may
defame the Company in England. English papers used to take 9 months to reach India.
By the early 19th century, many cities in Europe, as well as North and South
America, published newspaper-type publications though not all of them developed in
the same way; content was vastly shaped by regional and cultural preferences.
Advances in printing technology related to the Industrial Revolution enabled
newspapers to become an even more widely circulated means of communication. In
1814, The Times (London) acquired a printing press capable of making 1,100
impressions per minute.
Soon, it was adapted to print on both sides of a page at once. This innovation
made newspapers cheaper and thus available to a larger part of the population. In
1830, the first penny press newspaper came to the market: Lynde M. Walter's Boston
Transcript. Penny press papers cost about one sixth the price of other newspapers and
appealed to a wider audience.
2828
COMPANY PROFILE COMPANY PROFILE
Name : Kumudam Publications Pvt. Ltd.
Geographical location : Kumudam publications Pvt.Ltd,
Purasaiwakkam, Chennai.
Manufacturing product : Weekly magazines
Managing director : R.Sabareswar
Nature of the company : Medium scale industry
Number of workers : 150
Production : 3 metric ton/ week
Established in the Year : 1999
29
HISTORY OF COMPANY
KUMUDAM - A UNIQUE PROFESSIONALISM
Kumudam publication pvt.ltd. has over the years earned a
reputation that is rock-solid. While its reputation is reflected in the
edifices that it has built, the respect and trust that it continues to enjoy can
be gauged from the words of its coustomers.
To Kumudam, journalism is a combination of competence,
technology, skill and dedication, unified and strengthened by a code of
ethics. It is this special professionalism that has won for us many
prestigious awards in a variety of market and encourages us to aim for
greater challenges all the time.
CORPORATE OVERVIEW
Kumudam Magazine is an ISO-certified company with a turnover
of around Rs. 10Cr . It has a significant presence in India, with offices in
Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Delhi, Kolkata, Pune and Trivandrum.
Kumudam’s services encompass Politics, Cinema, Business,
interviews of Vip’s etc. It as the credit of its customers to satisfy them in
the part by giving them the interesting articles that they like to read by
this only even in this competition also kumudam is showing To
Kumudam good turnover prints everyweek. We have different
departments that which controls different kinds of activities in the office.
Departments follows Human Resources, Marketing & advertisement,
printing, designing, editing, Finance department.
30
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
R.Sabareswar - Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
S.Sivaramakrishnan – Managing Director
V.G.Janarthanam - Director Operations
DIRECTORS
Rajakumar KEC
Jayaram Rangan
K.Kannan
P.Venkatesh
P.K.Sridharan
Dr.P.K.Aravindan
31
ORGANISATION CHARTORGANISATION CHART
32
CHAPTER-IV
Managing Director
PurchaseDepartmen
t
SalesDepartmen
t
MarketingDepartmen
t
Accounts & FinanceDepartmen
t
General Manager
Purchase Manager
SalesManager
MarketingManager
Finance Manager
Chief Accountant
Supervisors
QualityDepartmen
t
Production Departmen
t
Quality Manager
Production Manager
Human Resource
Department
General Manager
Workers
Workers Workers Workers Workers Workers Workers Workers
DATA ANALISYS AND
INTERPRETATION CHAPTER-IV
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The term analysis refers to the computation of certain measures along
with searching for pattern of relationship that exist among the data groups. The
objective of the study is to determine the impact of organisational stress among
the employees in Kumudam Publications Pvt.Ltd., Chennai.
This portion consists of the individual profile of the respondents of the
organisation. For this percentage analysis was used. Independent variables like
gender, age, etc…. are chosen. The data collected on each of the above
variables using questionnaire is analyzed using percentage analysis. A five
point scale is used for each statement.
The survey was confined to Kumudam Publications Pvt.Ltd., Chennai.
33
TABLE NO: 1
Distribution of the respondents according to gender
Gender No. of Respondents PercentageMale 60 60Female 40 40Total 100 100
From the above table it can be seen that 60% of the respondents are
male and only 40% of the respondents are female. Therefore majority of the
respondents are male.
It is concluded that most of respondents (60) are male.
Figure no: 1
Distribution of the respondents according to gender
34TABLE NO: 2
Distribution of the respondents according to marital status
60%40%
Marital Status No. of samples PercentageSingle 25 25Married 75 75Total 100 100
From the above table it can be seen that 75% of the respondents are
married and only 25% of the respondents are single. Therefore majority of the
respondents are married.
Figure no: 2
Distribution of the respondents according to marital status
35TABLE NO: 3
Distribution of respondents according to their educational qualification
25%
75%
Qualification No. of samples PercentagePrimary 11 11HSC 24 24Graduate 49 49Post Graduate 16 16Total 100 100
From the above table it can be seen that according to their educational
qualification 16% of the respondents are post graduate, 24% of the respondents
are HSC, 49% of the respondents are graduate and 11% of the respondents are
primary. Therefore according to their qualification most of the respondents are
graduate.
Figure no: 3
Distribution of respondents according to their educational qualification
36TABLE NO: 4
Distribution of respondents according to experience
24%
11%
49%
16%
Tenure No. of samples PercentageBelow 5 years 31 315-10 years 38 3810-20 years 22 2220 & above 9 9Total 100 100
From the above table it can be seen that according to experience 38% of
the respondents are between 5-10 years, 22% of the respondents are between
10-20 years, 31% of the respondents are below 5 years and 9% of the
respondents are above 20 years. Therefore according to experience most of the
respondents are between 5-10 years.
Figure no: 4
Distribution of respondents according to experience
37TABLE NO: 5
Distribution of respondents according to their work before office time
31%
38%
22%
9%
Reason No. of samples PercentageYes 45 45No 55 55Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 45% of the respondents are working
before office time and only 55% of the respondents are not working before
office time. There fore we can understand that majority of them are doing their
job after office time.
Figure no: 5
Distribution of respondents according to their work before office time
38TABLE NO: 6
Distribution of respondents according to their work after office time
45%55%
Reason No. of samples PercentageYes 67 67
No 33 33Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 67% of the respondents are working
after office time and only 33% of the respondents are not working after office
time. Therefore we can understand that majority of them are doing their job
after office time.
Figure no: 6
Distribution of respondents according to their work after office time
39TABLE NO: 7
Distribution of respondents according to their office work at home
33%
67%
No. of samples PercentageYes 49 49No 51 51Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 49% of the respondents are working
are doing their work at home and 51% of the respondents are working are not
doing their work at home. Therefore we can understand that majority of them
are not doing their job at home.
Figure no: 7
Distribution of respondents according to their office work at home
40TABLE NO: 8
Distribution of respondents according to their work during lunch break
49%
51%
No. of samples PercentageYes 36 36No 64 64Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 36% of the respondents are working
during lunch break and 64% of the respondents are not working during lunch
break. Therefore we can understand that majority of them are not doing their
job during lunch break.
Figure no: 8
Distribution of respondents according to their work during lunch break
41TABLE NO: 9
Distribution of respondents according to their wake up
36%
64%
No. of samples PercentageBetween 4a.m & 5a.m 19 19Between 5a.m &6a.m 47 47Between 6a.m &7a.m 34 34Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 47% of the respondents wake up
between 5a.m & 6a.m, 34% of the respondents wake up between 6a.m &7a.m
and only 19% of the respondents wake up between 4a.m &5a.m. Therefore we
can understand that majority of the respondents wake up between 5a.m and
6a.m.
Figure no: 9
Distribution of respondents according to their wake up
42TABLE NO: 10
Distribution of respondents according to their resting time
19%
47%
34%
No. of samples PercentageBetween 9p.m &10p.m 18 18Between 10p.m &11p.m 50 50After 11p.m 32 32Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 50% of the respondents go to bed
between 10p.m & 11p.m, 32% of the respondents go to bed after 11p.m and
only 18% of the respondents go to bed between 9p.m &10p.m. Therefore we
can understand that majority of the respondents go to bed between 10p.m and
11p.m.
Figure no: 10
Distribution of respondents according to their resting time
43TABLE NO: 11
Distribution of respondents according to solve the problems related to work without anybodies help
32%18%
50%
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 20 20Rarely true 20 20Sometimes true 17 17Most of the time true 19 19Always true 24 24Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 20% of the respondents not at all
true, 20% of the respondents rarely true, 17% of the respondents sometimes
true, 19% of the respondents most of the time true and 24% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
always true.
Figure no: 11
Distribution of respondents according to solve the problems related to work without anybodies help
44TABLE NO: 12
Distribution of respondents according to lie awake at night thinking of the next days work
20% 20%17%
19%
24%
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 25 25Rarely true 32 32Sometimes true 29 29Most of the time true 4 4Always true 10 10Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 25% of the respondents not at all
true, 32% of the respondents rarely true, 29% of the respondents sometimes
true, 4% of the respondents most of the time true and 10% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
rarely true.
Figure no: 12
Distribution of respondents according to lie awake at night thinking of the next days work
45TABLE NO: 13
Distribution of respondents according to always insist on perfection in the quality of work done
25%
32%29%
4%10%
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 3 3Rarely true 23 23Sometimes true 21 21Most of the time true 17 17Always true 36 36Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 3% of the respondents not at all true,
23% of the respondents rarely true, 21% of the respondents sometimes true,
17% of the respondents most of the time true and 36% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
always true.
Figure no: 13
Distribution of respondents according to always insist on perfection in the quality of work done
46
TABLE NO: 14
Distribution of respondents according to feel that organization problems are your own
3%
23%21%
17%
36%
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 19 19Rarely true 22 22Sometimes true 18 18Most of the time true 14 14Always true 27 27Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 19% of the respondents not at all
true, 22% of the respondents rarely true, 18% of the respondents sometimes
true, 14% of the respondents most of the time true and 27% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
always true.
Figure no: 14
Distribution of respondents according to feel that organization problems are your own
47
TABLE NO: 15
Distribution of respondents according to training and expertise are utilized in your present role
19%22%
18%14%
27%
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 13 13Rarely true 35 35Sometimes true 21 21Most of the time true 15 15Always true 16 16Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 13% of the respondents not at all
true, 35% of the respondents rarely true, 21% of the respondents sometimes
true, 15% of the respondents most of the time true and 16% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
rarely true.
Figure no: 15
Distribution of respondents according to training and expertise are utilized in your present role
48
TABLE NO: 16
Distribution of respondents according to enjoy their role very much
13%
35%
21%
15%16%
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 7 7Rarely true 17 17Sometimes true 15 15Most of the time true 24 24Always true 37 37Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 7% of the respondents not at all true,
17% of the respondents rarely true, 15% of the respondents sometimes true,
24% of the respondents most of the time true and 37% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
always true.
Figure no: 16
Distribution of respondents according to enjoy their role very much
49
TABLE NO: 17
7%
17%15%
24%
37%
Distribution of respondents according to the power to take decisions in their role
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 13 13Rarely true 15 15Sometimes true 31 31Most of the time true 26 26Always true 15 15Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 13% of the respondents not at all
true, 15% of the respondents rarely true, 31% of the respondents sometimes
true, 26% of the respondents most of the time true and 15% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
sometimes true.
Figure no: 17
Distribution of respondents according to the power to take decisions in their role
50TABLE NO: 18
15%13% 15%
31%26%
Distribution of respondents according to communicate frankly with their immediate supervisor
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 23 23Rarely true 24 24Sometimes true 22 22Most of the time true 17 17Always true 14 14Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 23% of the respondents not at all
true, 24% of the respondents rarely true, 22% of the respondents sometimes
true, 17% of the respondents most of the time true and 14% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
rarely true.
Figure no: 18
Distribution of respondents according to communicate frankly with their immediate supervisor
51TABLE NO: 19
23% 24%
22%
17% 14%
Distribution of respondents according to meet the expectations of their boss
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 12 12Rarely true 16 16Sometimes true 30 30Most of the time true 9 9Always true 33 33Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 12% of the respondents not at all
true, 16% of the respondents rarely true, 30% of the respondents sometimes
true, 9% of the respondents most of the time true and 33% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
always true.
Figure no: 19
Distribution of respondents according to meet the expectations of their boss
52
TABLE NO: 20
12%
16%
30%
9%
33%
Distribution of respondents according to employees who don’t spend much time with their family
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 22 22Rarely true 33 33Sometimes true 22 22Most of the time true 10 10Always true 13 13Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 22% of the respondents not at all
true, 33% of the respondents rarely true, 22% of the respondents sometimes
true, 10% of the respondents most of the time true and 13% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
rarely true.
Figure no: 20
Distribution of respondents according to employees who don’t spend much time with their family
53
TABLE NO: 21
13%
22%
33%
22%
10%
Distribution of respondents according to employees who have heavy work load
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 16 16Rarely true 23 23Sometimes true 35 35Most of the time true 13 13Always true 13 13Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 16% of the respondents not at all
true, 23% of the respondents rarely true, 35% of the respondents sometimes
true, 13% of the respondents most of the time true and 13% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents
sometimes true.
Figure no: 21
Distribution of respondents according to employees who have heavy work load
54
TABLE NO: 22
16%
23%
35%
13% 13%
Distribution of respondents according to employees who are not clear about the expectations of their role
No. of samples PercentageNot at all true 29 29Rarely true 26 26Sometimes true 24 24Most of the time true 9 9Always true 12 12Total 100 100
From the above table it is seen that 29% of the respondents not at all
true, 26% of the respondents rarely true, 24% of the respondents sometimes
true, 9% of the respondents most of the time true and 12% of the respondents
always true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents not
at all true.
Figure no: 22
Distribution of respondents according to employees who are not clear about the expectations of their role
55
CORRELATION
29%
26% 24%
9%12%
Relationship between organization problems are your own and enjoy their role very much
∑ xy r =
√∑x 2 * √∑y 2
X-20 Y-20X x x 2 Y Y y 2 xy19 -1 1 7 -13 169 1322 2 4 17 -3 9 -618 -2 4 15 -5 25 1014 -6 36 24 4 16 -2027 7 49 37 17 289 119100 0 94 100 0 508 116
∑x 2 =94 ∑y 2 =508 ∑xy=116
∑ xy r =
√∑x 2 * √∑y 2
116 =
9.69 * 22.53
116 =
218.52
= 0.5308
Interpretation:
There is a positive correlation between the employees consideration
towards this organizations problems as their own of the enjoyment of their own
role.
56CHI-SQUARE
Relationship between perfection in the quality of work done and employees who have heavy work load
Not at all true
Rarely true
Sometimes true
Most of the time true
Always true
Total
Not at all true
5 4 3 2 2 16
Rarely true
9 8 2 1 3 23
Sometimes true
10 9 7 5 4 35
Most of the time true
7 2 1 2 1 13
Always true
6 4 2 1 0 13
Total 37 27 15 11 10 100
H1= There is a true relationship between the perfection in the quality of
work done & heavy work done .
H0= There is no true relationship between the perfection in the quality of
work done & heavy work done.
X2 =∑ (O-E)2 / E
←57
O E O-E (O-E) 2 (O-E) 2 /E
5 5.92 -0.92 0.84 0.149 4.32 4.68 21.90 5.0610 2.4 7.6 57.76 24.067 1.76 5.24 27.45 15.596 1.6 4.4 19.36 12.14 8.51 -4.51 20.34 2.398 6.21 1.79 3.20 0519 3.45 5.55 30.80 8.922 2.53 -0.53 0.28 0.114 2.3 1.7 2.89 1.253 12.95 -9.95 99.00 7.642 9.45 -7.45 55.50 5.877 5.25 1.75 3.06 0.581 3.85 -2.85 8.122 2.102 3.5 -1.5 2.25 0.642 4.81 -2.81 7.89 1.641 3.51 -2.51 6.300 1.795 1.95 3.05 9.30 4.762 1.43 0.57 0.32 0.221 1.3 -0.3 0.09 0.062 4.81 -2.81 7.89 1.643 3.51 -0.51 0.26 0.074 1.95 2.05 4.20 2.151 1.43 -0.43 0.18 0.120 1.3 -1.3 1.69 1.3
100.72
100.72 -------> calculated26.3 -------> Table Value
V = (r-1)*(c-1) = (5-1)*(5-1) = (4)*(4) = 16
At 5% of significance at value 16. The table values 26.3
Interpretation:
As the calculated value is higher than the table value the project (Ho) is
rejected.
58
CHAPTER-V
FINDINGS
AND SUGGESSTIONS
CHAPTER- V
FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS
Findings
The study was conducted to find out the strategies adopted
to manage stress of the employees of Aishweriya Rubber Products,
Coimbatore.
According to gender 60% of the respondents are male and only 40% of
the respondents are female. Therefore majority of the respondents are
male.
According to marital status 75% of the respondents are married and only
25% of the respondents are single. Therefore majority of the respondents
are married.
According to their educational qualification 16% of the respondents are
post graduate, 24% of the respondents are HSC, 49% of the respondents
are graduate and 11% of the respondents are primary. Therefore
according to their qualification most of the respondents are graduate.
According to experience 38% of the respondents are between 5-10
years, 22% of the respondents are between 10-20 years, 31% of the
respondents are below 5 years and 9% of the respondents are above 20
years. Therefore according to experience most of the respondents are
between 5-10 years.
According to their work before office time 45% of the respondents are
working before office time and 55% of the respondents are not working
before office time. Therefore we can understand that majority of them
are doing their job after office time.
59.
According to their office work at home 49% of the respondents are
doing their work at home and 51% of the respondents are not doing their
work at home. Therefore we can understand that majority of them are
not doing their job at home.
According to their work during lunch break 36% of the respondents are
working during lunch break and 64% of the respondents are not working
during lunch break. Therefore we can understand that majority of them
are not doing their job during lunch break.
According to their wake up 47% of the respondents wake up between
5a.m & 6a.m, 34% of the respondents wake up between 6a.m &7a.m
and only 19% of the respondents wake up between 4a.m &5a.m.
Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents wake up
between 5a.m and 6a.m.
According to their resting time 50% of the respondents go to bed
between 10p.m & 11p.m, 32% of the respondents go to bed after 11p.m
and only 18% of the respondents go to bed between 9p.m &10p.m.
Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents go to bed
between 10p.m and 11p.m.
According to solve the problems related to work without anybodies help
20% of the respondents not at all true, 20% of the respondents rarely
true, 17% of the respondents sometimes true, 19% of the respondents
most of the time true and 24% of the respondents always true. Therefore
we can understand that majority of the respondents always true.
According to lie awake at night thinking of the next days work 25% of
the respondents not at all true, 32% of the respondents rarely true, 29%
of the respondents sometimes true, 4% of the respondents most of the
time true and 10% of the respondents always true. Therefore we can
understand that majority of the respondents rarely true.
60
According to always insist on perfection in the quality of work done 3%
of the respondents not at all true, 23% of the respondents rarely true,
21% of the respondents sometimes true, 17% of the respondents most of
the time true and 36% of the respondents always true. Therefore we can
understand that majority of the respondents always true.
According to feel that organization problems are your own 19% of the
respondents not at all true, 22% of the respondents rarely true, 18% of
the respondents sometimes true, 14% of the respondents most of the
time true and 27% of the respondents always true. Therefore we can
understand that majority of the respondents always true.
According to training and expertise are utilized in your present role 13%
of the respondents not at all true, 35% of the respondents rarely true,
21% of the respondents sometimes true, 15% of the respondents most of
the time true and 16% of the respondents always true. Therefore we can
understand that majority of the respondents rarely true.
According to enjoy their role very much 7% of the respondents not at all
true, 17% of the respondents rarely true, 15% of the respondents
sometimes true, 24% of the respondents most of the time true and 37%
of the respondents always true. Therefore we can understand that
majority of the respondents always true.
According to the power to take decisions in their role 13% of the
respondents not at all true, 15% of the respondents rarely true, 31% of
the respondents sometimes true, 26% of the respondents most of the
time true and 15% of the respondents always true. Therefore we can
understand that majority of the respondents sometimes true.
According to communicate frankly with their immediate supervisor 23%
of the respondents not at all true, 24% of the respondents rarely true,
22% of the respondents sometimes true, 17% of the respondents most of
the time true and 14% of the respondents always true
61
According to meet the expectations of their boss 12% of the respondents
not at all true, 16% of the respondents rarely true, 30% of the
respondents sometimes true, 9% of the respondents most of the time true
and 33% of the respondents always true. Therefore we can understand
that majority of the respondents always true.
According to employees who don’t spend much time with their family
22% of the respondents not at all true, 33% of the respondents rarely
true, 22% of the respondents sometimes true, 10% of the respondents
most of the time true and 13% of the respondents always true. Therefore
we can understand that majority of the respondents rarely true.
According to employees who have heavy work load 16% of the
respondents not at all true, 23% of the respondents rarely true, 35% of
the respondents sometimes true, 13% of the respondents most of the
time true and 13% of the respondents always true. Therefore we can
understand that majority of the respondents sometimes true.
According to employees who are not clear about the expectations of
their role 29% of the respondents not at all true, 26% of the respondents
rarely true, 24% of the respondents sometimes true, 9% of the
respondents most of the time true and 12% of the respondents always
true. Therefore we can understand that majority of the respondents not at
all true.
62
Suggestions
The following suggestions are made to improve the organizational
performance and for a sound organizational position.
The firm can increase the organizational strength by increasing the
number of workers.
The firm can use Collateral Stress Programs like Stress management
programs, Health promotion programs and Screening programs to detect
signs of stress.
Since team work is very important in the work place.
More entertainment program can be conducted for the employees to
reduce the work stress.
In order to reduce the heavy work load of the employees more
employees can be appointed.
More remuneration should be given to the employees doing more work.
63
CHAPTER-VI CONCLUSION
CHAPTER- VI
CONCLUSION
The present study concerned about organizational stress among
employees of Kumudam Publications Pvt, Ltd., on the basis of the results of
the study is able to find out the strategies adopted by the employees to manage
stress. .
Organizational stress measures show that the organizational position of
Kumudam Publications Pvt.Ltd.. In order to maintain a stress less satisfactory
organizational position and also to prevent chances of stress. Kumudam
Publications Pvt.Ltd. can use both institutional and collateral programs to
reduce stress.
64
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBILOGRAPHY
L.M, Prasad, Organizational Behaviour. 6th Edition. Sultan Chand and
Co. Ltd., New Delhi.
Moorhead / Giriffin, Organizational Behaviour. 5th Edition, A.I.T.B.S
Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi.
D.D. Sharma, Marketing Research, Sultan Chand and Co. Ltd., New
Delhi.
Baron A.R., Gerald , 1983, “Behaviour in Organization” Allyn
and Bacon publications
Brown 1991, “physical fitness, resistance to stress and personal help”
allyn and bacon publications
Charles Worth, E.A. and Nathan R.G, 1985, “stress management, a
comprehensive guide to your wellbeing”.
Coleman, Vernon, 1981 “Stress control”, Tata Mc Graw Hill
Publications
Cooper, L Cary 1982, “stress research” tata mc graw hill publications
Davis K, 1972 “ human behavior at work” ., organizational behavior,
tata mc graw hill publications
Bunham 1980, “hand book of industrial and organization psychology”
Mearlly college publishing co.
Hari gopal K, 1995, “organizational stress” sulthan chand sons
publications.
Holmes and Masuda, 1974, stress full life events, behavioral in
organization. Allyn and bacon publications.
65
ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE
A STUDY ON STRESS MANAGEMENT AMONG EMPLOYEES IN
KUMADAM PUBLICATION PVT LTD AT CHENNAI.
1. Name of the employee:
2. Age :
3. Gender : Male [ ] Female [ ]
4. Marital status : Single [ ] Married [ ]
5. Educational qualification
Primary [ ] HSC [ ] Graduate [ ] Post Graduate [ ]
6. Experience of the employee in the organization.
Below 5 years [ ] 5-10 years [ ]
10-20 years [ ] 20 & above [ ]
7. Whether you will do your work before office time?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
8. Whether you will do your work after office time?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
9. Whether you will do your office work at home?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
10. Whether you will do your work during lunch time?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
11. When will you woke up?
Between 4am & 5am [ ] Between 5am & 6am [ ]
Between 6am & 7am [ ]
12. When will you take rest?
Between 9pm & 10pm [ ] Between 10pm & 11pm [ ]
After 11pm [ ]
66
13. When you have a problem related to work, you like to solve it yourself,
without anybodies help?
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
14. You lie awake at night thinking of the next days work.
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
15. You always insist on perfection in the quality of work done.
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
16. You feel that the organizations problems are your own.
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
17. Your training and expertise are utilized in your present role
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
18. You enjoy your role very much
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
19. You have power to take decisions in your role
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
20. You communicate frankly with your immediate supervisor
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
21. You want to meet the expectations of your boss
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
67
22. You don’t spend much time with your family
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
23. You have too heavy work load
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
24. You are not clear about the expectations of your role
[ ] Not at all true [ ] Rarely true [ ] Some times true
[ ] Most of the time true [ ] Always true
25. Any suggestions to avoid stress among employees.
68