a reanalysis of hurricane hazel (1954) scott weese, ron mctaggart-cowan and john r. gyakum...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
238 views
TRANSCRIPT
A Reanalysis of Hurricane Hazel (1954)
Scott Weese, Ron McTaggart-Cowan and John R. Gyakum
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
June 4th, 2003
Talk Outline
1 . Background
2 . Synoptic Overview
3 . MC2 Simulation Results
4 . Conclusions
Purpose: to study the thermodynamic and dynamic properties of one of the most deadly and costly weather disasters to strike southern Ontario
• Hazel struck Ontario on 15-16 October 1954
• rains led to flooding in Humber, Credit and Don River valleys situated near Toronto, and in the Holland Marsh north of Toronto
• over 80 fatalities, and $175 million damage was done by Hurricane Hazel in Ontario
Track of Hurricane Hazel
Reference: Mason, A.H., M.K. Thomas and D.W. Boyd. 1955. The October 15-16, 1954 Storm, “Hurricane Hazel” in Ontario.
Synoptic Overview
• Considering the time between October 15th at 00z to October 16th at 12z as this is the period of the most intense rainfall in southern Ontario
• Using the NCEP reanalysis data (Kalnay et al. 1996) to generate fields of interest
Figs. (a)-(d): SLP (hPa) and Thickness (dam)00 UTC 15 to 12 UTC 16 October
Dynamic Tropopause Maps
• The dynamic tropopause is defined as the 1.5 PVU surface
• 1 PVU = 10-6m2s-1K kg-1
• Ertel’s Potential Vorticity (PV) (Ertel 1942):
1
EPV
Figs. (a)-(d): DT Winds and and 850 hPa
00 UTC 15 to 12 UTC 16 October
Coupling Index, Equivalent Potential Temperature and Precipitable Water
• Coupling Index (CI) is a measure of bulk atmospheric stability (Bosart and Lackmann 1995)
• Values of CI < 10 suggest convective instability
• Precipitable water is the column integrated water vapour
)(CI sfcmaxeDT
2
1
p
pdpw
g
1PWTR
Figs. (a)-(d): Coupling Index and Precip. Water (mm)
00 UTC 15 October to 12 UTC 16 October
MC2 Simulation
• Using MC2 (Mesoscale Compressible Community Model) to simulate Hazel
• NCEP Reanalysis data utilized for the initial and boundary conditions
• following the work of Palmen (1958) and Anthes (1990)
• test sensitivity of Hazel to improved vortex structure using model by Kurihara (1993), and increased spatial resolution (36 km)
Tracks of Hurricane Hazel
Average Depth of Precipitation
0
5
10
15
20
0-3
3.-6
6.-9
9.-12
12.-1
5
15.-1
8
18.-2
1
21.-2
4.
24.-2
7
Time Period (hours)
Amou
nt (m
m)
Sea Level Pressure for Hurricane Hazel
960
970
980
990
1000
1010
15/00z
15/06z
15/12z
15/18z
16/00z
October 1954 Date
SLP
(mb)
AnthesNCEPBogusKnox
SLP Comparison 15 UTC 15
October
top: Palmen’s analysislower left: MC2lower right: Anthes
SLP Comparison3 UTC 16October
top: Palmen’s analysislower left: MC2 lower right: Anthes
Knox’s Jump
SLP for 21 UTC 15 October to 03 UTC 16 October
Precipitation Comparison, 15 October
Conclusions
• Successfully reproduced transformation of Hazel with accompanying frontogenesis and heavy precipitation over U.S.
• Improved vortex structure and increased spatial resolution necessary for successful mesoscale modeling of Hazel