a comparison of two license plate acquiring methods ubiquitous computing david filipovic

14
Speech vs. typing A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Upload: jeremy-jones

Post on 20-Jan-2016

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Speech vs. typingA comparison of two license plate acquiring

methods

Ubiquitous computingDavid Filipovic

Page 2: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Police officers -> always on the move

Acquiring license plate numbers while driving

What is better?

The problem

Page 3: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Police officers in charge of safety

We can also help to keep them safe

Why?

Page 4: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Assumed: typing has more adverse effects on driving performance

Possible explanation: More time spent looking off road

Assumptions – the hypothesis

Page 5: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Conduct a study using the driving simulator Have participants drive and perform under

tasks experimental conditions

Collect data

Approach (1)

Page 6: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Driving scenario: 2-lane highway Vehicles approached from their right

Primary task: driving Secondary task: collecting license plates

Approach (2)

Page 7: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Driving performance data◦ Lane position, steering wheel angle, PDT…

Physiological data◦ EKG, skin conductance, pupil diameter

Qualitative data◦ Participants’ opinions, NASA-TLX

Data collected

Page 8: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

A ruggedized keyboard for the typing task

Ambient speech recognition (100% accuracy)

The setup

Page 9: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Four male subjects

Aged 22-25, average: 23.75

Experienced drivers

Proficient QWERTY keyboard users

Participants

Page 10: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

The results (1)

Speech Typing0

10

20

30

40

50

60

NASA-TLX Workload rat-ing

Interaction type

NA

SA

-TLX

work

load r

ati

ng

Speech Typing0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Task completion time [s]

Interaction type

task c

om

ple

tion t

ime [

s]

Page 11: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

The results (2)

Speech Typing0

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.09

Mean lane position variance

Interaction type

mean lane p

osit

ion v

ari

ance

Speech Typing0

0.51

1.52

2.53

3.54

Mean steering wheel angle

variance

Interaction type

mean s

teeri

ng w

heel angle

vari

ance

ANOVA, p<0.022

Page 12: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

The results (3)

800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

speech typing

Steering wheel angle

Page 13: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Definitive presence of an effect

Future study with more participants

Conclusion

Page 14: A comparison of two license plate acquiring methods Ubiquitous computing David Filipovic

Questions?