a comparison of omi no 2 vtc with in- situ measurements in switzerland dominik brunner, brigitte...
TRANSCRIPT
Materials Science &Technology
A comparison of OMI NO2 VTC with in-situ measurements in Switzerland
Dominik Brunner, Brigitte Buchmann,Thomas Seitz, and Martin Steinbacher
Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research Laboratory for Air Pollution and Environmental Technology
8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
Thanks to Folkert Boersma and Ruud Dirksen (KNMI)for creating the post-analysis near-real time (PA-NRT) OMI data
and providing it through TEMIS
2Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
Motivation The NABEL air quality monitoring network in Switzerland NOx and NO2 trends since 1980s
Measurements with conventional NOx sensors Lessons from parallel operation of molybdenum &
photolytic converters
Comparison with in situ NO2 measurements NO2(m) = NOx (molybdenum) - NO NO2(c ) = NO2(m) corrected for interferences
Comparison with ground-based NO2 columns Measurement stations and method used for computation
of columns Direct comparison with columns integrated over profile Comparison with averaging kernel weighted columns
Conclusions and outlook
Outline
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
3Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
Urban, near street Rural < 1000 m amslUrban, in park Rural > 1000 m amslMotorway Prealpine, forestAgglomeration Alpine
Swiss Air Pollution Monitoring Network (NABEL)
Air Pollution/Environmental Technology
50kmN
Basel
Bern
Chaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
PayerneRigi
Sion
Tänikon
Zürich
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
4Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
Assessment of Swiss Air Pollution Policy Swiss National Air Pollution Monitoring Network (NABEL)
sulphur dioxide (SO2)
nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
µg
/m3 Limit value
NABEL measurement station Zurich downtowncity background
Additional reduction
measures needed
Air Pollution reduction measures successful
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
5Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
6Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
NO2 measurements using conventional NOx sensors with Molybdenum converters
PAN
Mean annual NOMean annual NO22 cycles cycles
rural pre-alpine
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
7Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
SC
IA
OM
I
~60% high inspring/summer
~20% high inautumn/winter
rural
pre-alpine
NO2 measurements using conventional NOx sensors with Molybdenum converters
Mean diurnal cyclesMean diurnal cycles
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
8Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
OMI NO2 VTCs vs. ground-based NO2Selection of OMI pixels for given NABEL measurement stationsSelection of OMI pixels for given NABEL measurement stations
Payerne (rural)
Tänikon (rural)
Dübendorf (sub-urban)
Swiss high-resolution NOx inventory
Zurich
Bern
Basel
Geneva
Swiss alps
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
9Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
OMI NO2 VTCs vs. ground-based NO2
Daily hourly mean 12-13 UTC (13-14 LT) values at Tänikon Daily hourly mean 12-13 UTC (13-14 LT) values at Tänikon used for comparison with OMIused for comparison with OMI
NO2(m), molybdenum converter
NO2(c), corrected (Steinbacher et al., 2007)
Clear sky according to both OMI and ground
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
10Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
OMI NO2 VTCs vs. ground-based NO2
Fractional cloud cover of OMI pixels over TänikonFractional cloud cover of OMI pixels over Tänikon
Fractional cloud cover
Temperature at Tänikon
Points identified as clear sky basedon global radiation sensor at Tänikon
Snow cover
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
11Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
NO2(m)
Direct comparison with volume mixing ratios Direct comparison with volume mixing ratios measured in-situ at Tänikonmeasured in-situ at Tänikon
OMI NO2 VTCs vs. ground-based NO2
Corrected NO2(c)
NO2(c) [ppb]NO2(m) [ppb]
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
12Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
Construction of vertical profiles and VTCs at Tänikon and PayerneConstruction of vertical profiles and VTCs at Tänikon and Payernefrom ground based observations at different altitudesfrom ground based observations at different altitudes
OMI NO2 VTCs vs. ground-based NO2 VTCs
50km
Chaumont
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
PayerneRigi
TänikonCombination of measurements atTänikon 539 m amslLägeren 689 mRigi 1013 mChaumont 1137 mJungfraujoch 3650 m
NO2(m) at Tänikon vs. Lägeren NO2(m) at Chaumont vs. Rigi
r=0.89 r=0.75
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
13Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
Selected NOSelected NO22 profiles above Tänikon reconstructed profiles above Tänikon reconstructed
from ground-based corrected NOfrom ground-based corrected NO22(c) measurements(c) measurements
OMI NO2 VTCs vs. ground-based NO2 VTCs
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
Winter (28. Jan 2006) Summer (18. Aug 2006)
TänikonLägeren
Rigi and Chaumont
Jungfraujoch
14Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
Direct comparison without using averaging kernelsDirect comparison without using averaging kernels
OMI NO2 VTCs vs. ground-based NO2 VTCs
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
15Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
Ground-based columns using averaging kernelsGround-based columns using averaging kernels(see Schaub et al., 2006)(see Schaub et al., 2006)
OMI NO2 VTCs vs. ground-based NO2 VTCs
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook
16Materials Science&Technology
50km N
Basel
BernChaumont
Davos
DübendorfHärkingen
Jungfraujoch
Lägeren
Lausanne
Lugano
Magadino
Payerne Rigi
Sion
TänikonZürich
NABEL in situ measurements from different stations at different elevations combined to construct vertical profiles
Conventional NOx measurements need correction
Comparison of OMI VTCs with in situ NO2 VMR shows reasonable to good agreement except for summer
No improvement when using corrected NO2(c)
Comparison of OMI VTCs with ground-based reconstructed VTCs shows better agreement than comparison with NO2 VMR
Using averaging kernels significantly improves agreementbetween OMI VTCs and reconstructed VTCs
Future: Use photolytic converter measurements at Payerne andRigi, extend data set to 2007, new OMI data version, try toassess uncertainty of ground-based columns
Summary and outlook
Outline
Motivation NABEL NOx trends
NOx sensors
Comparisonin-situ NO2
NO2(m) NO2(c)
Comparisonto columns Method Direct Avg. kernel
Conclusions& Outlook