52049510 power plant design part iii

Upload: karthi-keyan

Post on 03-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    1/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Location

    Guinsiliban, Camiguin

    Camiguin, the smallest province in Northern Mindanao (Region X), had a total population of74,232 persons based on the results of the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. It wasthe second to the smallest in the Philippines in terms of population. It registered an annualgrowth rate of 1.88 percent from 1995 to 2000, higher than the 1.08 percent growth rateduring the 1990 to 1995 period. If the current rate continues, the population of Camiguin was

    expected to double in 37 years.

    The number of households rose to 14,826, higher by 1,352 households from the 1995 figure.The average household size was 5.0 persons (same as the national average), which waslower than the 1995 average of 5.04 persons.

    Of the five municipalities in Camiguin, its capital Mambajao, which comprised 42 percent ofthe total provincial population, was the largest in terms of population size. Catarman,Mahinog, and Sagay followed with 21 percent, 17 percent and 14 percent, respectively. Of thetotal population, Guinsiliban had the least share (seven percent).

    Camiguin had the least population in Northern Mindanao (Region X), contributing only 2.70

    percent to the 2.7 million population of the region. At the national level, Camiguin shared 0.10percent to the total Philippine population of 76.5 million as recorded in the Census 2000.

    Of the total household population five years old and over, about two out of five persons hadattended or completed elementary education. Thirty one percent had either attended orfinished high school while 12 percent had attended college. Only four percent were academicdegree holders. More than half of those who had attended or finished elementary education(53.1 percent) and post secondary (54.7 percent) were males. On the other hand, those whohad attended or finished college, academic degree holders and post baccalaureate werepredominantly females.

    About 45 percent of the total population in Camiguin classified themselves as Cebuano.

    Kamigin/Kinamiging followed with 36 percent and the Boholanos, with 11 percent. Theremaining three percent were either Binisaya or belonged to other ethnic groups.

    There were 15,449 housing units in Camiguin, of which 14,735 were occupied. This registeredan increase of 23.3 percentage points from 1990, a ratio of 1.01 household per occupiedhousing unit, and 5.03 persons per occupied housing unit. Almost all (98.6 percent) occupiedhousing units were single houses, an increase of 22 percentage points from the 1990 figure.

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    2/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Guinsiliban is 6.9% of total population of Camiguin therefore we can assume that out of

    14,735 Occupied Housing Unit there are 1002 single houses which represents the majority of

    the building structures on Guinsiliban and a household population of 1023.

    Demographic Data:

    Total No. of Population: 5,092

    Household Population: 1023

    Structures:

    (Group A)

    Single House: 1002

    Duplex: 6

    (Group B)

    Multi-Unit Residential: 3

    Commercial/Industrial/Agricultural: 1

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    3/40

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    LoadinkW

    Load Per Hour

    Load Per Hour

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Graphical Representation of Load

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    4/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Load Table (GROUP A)

    Load Table (GROUP B)

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    5/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Total Power Consumption Table

    25449.08kW-hr/day

    Design Overview

    Peak Load = 2357.16 kW, 2.35716mW

    Plant Capacity: 3200 kW, 3.2mW

    No. of Engines: 5

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    6/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Engine Capacity Number of Hours of Operation/day

    Unit 1 800 kW 18 hours/day

    Unit 2 800 kW 18 hours/day

    Unit 3 800 kW 18 hours/day

    Unit 4 800 kW 18 hours/day

    Unit 5 800 kW Reserve

    Schedule of Engine Operation

    Time ofOperation

    EngineOperating

    TimeInterval

    12AM - 6AM UNIT 1,2 & 3 6 hours

    6AM -12NN UNIT 2,3 & 4 6 hours

    12NN - 6PM UNIT 4,1 & 2 6 hours6PM - 12AM UNIT 3,4 & 1 6 hours

    Each Unit has a 6 straight hours break.

    Design for Machine Foundation

    For 800 kW Generator Set (Per Unit 1,2,3,4 and 5)

    Mixture for Concrete Foundation:

    Use 1:3:5 concrete mixture ratio (from PPE by F.T. Morse, Table 4-1 p.90)

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    7/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Soil Bearing Pressure:

    Use 50-98 tones/m2 for compact clay (from PPE by F.T. Morse, Table 4-4 p.105)

    Soil Bearing Pressure (Sb)

    Weight of foundation

    Where:

    Wf= weight of the foundation, kgs

    We = weight of the engine, kgs

    e = empirical coefficient

    n = engine speed, RPM

    Use e = 0.11 (from PSME code, Table 2.4.2.3 (4), p.11)

    Volume of foundation

    Where:

    Vf= volume of foundation [m3]

    c = density of concrete = 2406 kg/m3

    Depth of Foundation

    Where:

    hf= depth of foundation [m]

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    8/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Lf= length of foundation [m]

    wf= width of the foundation [m]

    Length of the foundation:

    Where:

    Lb

    = length of bedplate [m]Le = length of engine [m]

    Width of the foundation:

    Where:

    wb = width of bedplate [m]

    we = width of the engine [m]

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    9/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Soil Stress

    Soil Stress

    Soil Stress

    Foundation Materials:

    Concrete Mixture Ratio = 1: 3: 5

    X + 3x + 5x = 15.32 m3

    9x = 15.32 m3

    X = 15.32 m3/ 9

    X = 1.70 m3

    For cement:1 x 6.2 x 1.70 m3 = 10.54 m3

    For sand:

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    10/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    3 x 0.52 x 1.70 m3 = 2.65 m3

    For gravel:

    5 x 0.86 x 1.70 m3 = 7.31 m3

    For Reinforcing Bar:

    Using 14 mm diam. rebars

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    11/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Flexure formula

    Eccentricity from mid-base

    Y1 = 1/2h = (1.25m) = 0.625m

    Y2 = 1/3h = 1/3(1.25m) = 0.42m

    A1 = Lf x h = (5 m)(1.25 m) = 6.25 m2

    A2 = Lfx b

    Where:

    b

    if b < wf, then wf= b; use b = wf= 2.5 m

    A2 = Lfx b = (5 m)(2.5 m) = 6.25 m2

    A = A1 + A2 = (6.25 + 6.25) m2 = 12.5 m2

    AY = A1Y1 + A2Y2 = [(6.25)(0.625) + (6.25)(0.42)] m3 = 6.53 m3

    C

    m =

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    12/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    For Bolts:

    Diameter = 1/8 x (bore) = 1/8 x (150mm) = 18.75 mm

    Length = 7/8 x (stroke) = 7/8 x (160 mm) = 140 mm

    Use L = 30D (from ASME code)

    L = 30 (18.75 mm) = 562.5 mm

    No. of boltsWhere:

    Tbolts

    From Table AT 7 DME by V.M. Faires

    Material: AISI 8630 (for connecting rods, bolts, shapes)

    Sy = 100 ksi = 100, 000 psi; Fy = 7 (max. for shock)

    Tbolts

    No. of bolts

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    13/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Design for Fuel Tank

    For 800 kW Generator Set (Per Unit 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 )

    Type of Oil: Diesel Fuel Oil

    Specific Gravity = 0.917 @ 60F

    (From Power Plant Theory and Design by P.J. Potter, Table 5-4, and p.187)

    Generator Output (EP) = 800 kW

    Specific Fuel Consumption

    Where:

    BP

    (For 1800 rpm & 494.73 kW Ave. Load)

    (From Power Plant Theory and Design by P.J. Potter, Figure 9-27, p.445)

    BP

    Specific Fuel Consumption

    Plant Operation = 24 hrs/day

    Engine Operating Hours/day = 18 hrs/day

    Expected Fuel Delivery Schedule = every 15 days

    % Rated Capacity

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    14/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    From PPE by F.T. Morse, Fig 6-15, p.164

    Max. fuel consumption = 0.25 kg/kW-hr

    Min. fuel consumption = 0.21 kg/kW-hr

    Volume of Day Tank

    Where:

    mF = daily fuel consumption [kg/day]F = density of fuel = 917 kg/m

    3

    mF = max. fuel consumption x BP x engine operating hours/day

    = (0.25 kg/kW-hr) (818 kW) (18 hrs/day)

    = 3681 kg / day

    Dimension of Day Tank

    (From the above equation)

    Assume:

    HDT = 2DDT = 2 (1.37 m) = 2.74 m

    Thickness of Fuel Day Tank

    Where:

    PT = pressure inside tank

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    15/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Where:

    fuel = 8.996 kN/m3

    PT = 2.74 m x 8.996 kN/m3 = 24.65 kN/m2 or kPa

    Sy = Tensile Yield = 35,000 psi (from DME by V.M. Faires, Table AT 4, p.568)

    F.S.y = Design factor of safety

    F.S.y = 3 (for stainless steel from DME by V.M. Faires Table 1.1, p.20)

    n = 75%

    Storage Tank for 30 days operation

    Dimension of Storage Tank

    (From the above equation)

    Assume:

    HST = 2DST = 2 (4.25 m) = 8.5 m

    Material for Fuel Tank: AISI No. 321 (stainless steel)

    Thickness of Fuel Storage Tank

    Where:

    PT = pressure inside tank

    Where:

    fuel = 8.996 kN/m3

    PT = 8.5 m x 8.996 kN/m3 = 76.46 kN/m2 or kPa

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    16/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Sy = Tensile Yield = 48,000 psi (from DME by V.M. Faires, Table AT 7, p.576)

    F.S.y = Design factor of safety

    F.S.y = 2 (for stainless steel from DME by V.M. Faires Table 1.1, p.20)

    n = 75%

    Transfer Pump from Fuel Storage Pump to Day Tank

    Assumption:

    Desired Operating Time for Fuel Pump = 1 hr/day

    p = 72%

    Power input for Unit 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Where:

    EPi = electrical power input [kW] or [hp]

    fuel = 8.996 kN/m3

    TDH = total dynamic head [m]

    Q = volume flow rate [m3/s

    Where:

    VDT = volume of fuel at day tank [m3/s]t = time of pump operation [sec]

    = 0.00111 m3/s

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    17/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    1 hp is used for unit 1 transfer pump

    Design for Heat Exchanger

    For 800 kW Generator Set (Per Unit 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5)

    Theoretical and Actual Limits of Cooling Water and Jacket Water

    (From PPE by F.T. Morse, p.178)

    tji = jacket water inlet temperature = 37.8 C

    tjo = jacket water outlet temperature = 65.6 C

    tcwi = cooling water inlet temperature = 32.2C

    tcwo = cooling water outlet temperature = 54.4 C

    LMTD

    tmax = (65.6 54.4) C = 11.2 C

    tmin = (37.8 32.2) C = 5.6 C

    LMTD

    Qj = mj x cpj x tj

    Where:

    Qj = heat rejected from jacket water = 358.9 kW (from catalog)

    mj = mass of jacket watertj = temp. Difference of jacket water= (65.6 37.8) C = 27.8 C

    Cpj = 4.187 kJ / kg-K (for water)

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    18/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    A

    Where:

    A = surface area of heat exchanger

    U = overall coefficient of heat transfer

    LMTD = log mean temp. Difference

    Solving for U (from PPT & D by P.J. Potter, Fig. 8-9, p.351 and p. 352)

    Where:

    = coefficient of heat transfer

    Ft = temp. Correction factor

    Fm = tube material and thickness correction factor

    Fc = cleanliness factor

    Fp = prime mover factor

    Tube Specifications:

    Material: Aluminum Brass 18 BWG

    Water Velocity = 9 ft/s

    Ft = 1.08

    Fm = 0.96

    Fc = 0.85

    Fp = 1.0

    C = 270

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    19/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Where:

    mcw = mj = 11,088 kg/hr

    = specific volume of circulating water @ t

    From steam table @ 51.7 C (by interpolation)

    = 1.01295 L/kg

    From PPT & D by P.J. Potter, p. 357

    For each No. 18 BWG tube will pass 1.042 GPM/1 fps

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    20/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Where:

    0.1963 ft2/lin. ft = outside surface area of tube (18 BWG)

    (From PPT & D by P.J. Potter, Table 8-1, p.353)

    Design for Cooling Tower

    For 800 kW Generator (Per Unit 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)

    BP = 818 kW = 1,096.51 hp

    Installation Data:

    t2 = engine water into heat exchanger (in) = 65.6 C

    t1 = engine water into heat exchanger (out) = 37.8 C

    tb = cooling water to heat exchanger = 32.2 C

    ta = cooling water to heat exchanger = 48.9 C (max. state of humidified air)

    Make-up water = 15.6 C ; 29.4 C DB & 21.1 C WB (@ atmospheric condition)

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    21/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Using the formula (from PPE by F.T Morse, eq. 6-16, p. 178)

    Where:

    W = cooling water [1 / hr)

    Bhp = rated brake horsepower

    t1 & t2 = inlet & outlet water temperatures [C]

    Let ww = water flow in the cooling tower circuit

    From PPE by F.T. Morse, p. 181

    The theoretical maximum humidified state of the air leaving is 48.9 C at 100 % humidity.

    Assume 5.5 C differential and 90% RH

    From Psychometric Chart @ 29.4 C DB & 21.1 C WB:

    SH1 = 0.0123 kg

    h1 = 79.088 kJ/kg

    Using the formula (from PPE by F.T Morse, eq. 6-19 & 6-20, p. 182)

    Where:

    Td = dry bulb temperature [C] = (48.9 5.5) C = 43.4 C

    RH = percent relative humidity

    Ps = saturation pressure of water vapor @ td

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    22/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Pa = atmospheric pressure [kg/cm2]

    hg = enthalpy at td, dry and saturated [J/kg]

    From Steam Table @ 43.4 C:

    Ps = 0.0895 kg/cm2 (converted value)

    Hg = 2,580,140 J/kg

    Using the formula (from PPE by F.T Morse, eq. 6-17 & 6-18, p. 177)

    Mass balance for cooling tower:

    Heat balance for cooling tower

    Ww = 1.7 kg water / kg dry air (from above equation)

    From Psychometric Chart

    Since air@ 29.4 C & 21.1 C = 0.862 m3/kg

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    23/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    = 60 %

    From PPE by F.T. Morse, p. 182Recommended Type: Natural Draft Cooling Tower

    Cooling Tower Pipe

    ; QCTP = mcw (f @ 32.2 C)

    From Steam Table (by interpolation)

    f= 1.00506 L/kg = 0.0010506 m3/kg

    Velocity of water @ HX = Velocity of water at cooling tower

    9 ft/s = 2.74 m/s

    ;

    Material Specification (from PSME code, p.200)

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    24/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Size: 1 in. Inside Dia.: 1.5 in Wall thickness: 0.2 in

    Schedule: 80x Outside Dia.: 1.9 in

    Cooling Tower Pump

    PCT = (QCTP)(water)(TDH)

    Assume z = 2 m ; TDH = 2 m

    PCT = (0.00324 m3/s)(9.807 kN/m3)(2 m) = 0.064 kW = 0.085 hp

    Assume p = 75 %

    Fan Power of Cooling Tower

    Fan Capacity

    QA = mAA

    Where:

    mA = mass of air = 1.59 kg/sA = specific vol. of air

    A = density of air @ standard condition = 1.2 kg/m3

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    25/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Cooling Tower Floor Area

    Concentration of Water = 80 L/min-m2

    ;

    Variable Load Calculations

    (We use 3200kW from catalog 800kw X 4 genset)

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    26/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    27/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Catalogue

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    28/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    29/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    30/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Perspective View

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    31/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    32/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    33/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Side View

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    34/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Top View

    List of Materials

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    35/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Materials Quantity

    Cement 3675

    Gravel 435

    Anchor Bolts 1/8 x 7/8 3315

    Renforcing Bars 14mm x 20ft 65

    Aluminum Brass Tube 3/4" 120

    List of Equipments

    Equipment Quantity

    800kW Diesel Genset (IDLC 800-2M) 5

    Fuel Transfer Pump 1hp 5

    Cooling Tower Pump 0.11hp 10Cooling Water Fan 0.27hp 10

    Heat Exchanger

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    36/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    37/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Cooling Tower

    Fuel Tank

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    38/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Machine Foundation

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    39/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Rizal Technological University

    Boni Ave., Mandaluyong City

  • 7/29/2019 52049510 Power Plant Design PART III

    40/40

    RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    College of Engineering and Industrial Technology

    Mechanical Engineering Department

    In partial fulfillment

    Of the course requirements on

    ME 54L - Power Plant Design Lab

    Submitted by:

    Submitted to:

    Engr. Gerry Cabrera

    Submitted on:

    March 14, 2011