5 things i learnt while building #rsrsrc
TRANSCRIPT
things I learnt while building #rsrsrc... ...one of the best sourcing centres in Europe Balazs Paroczay
5
45,644 identified candidates
66 clients
74 trained Recruiters
53,450 files in 7,024 folders
28 languages, 18 nationalities
candidate relationship management –
job boards – matching technology -
resume building - college recruiting –
job marketing & distribution -
professional & social networking –
social sourcing - referral platforms
so what makes you different?
of course, tech is important but...
1. spend ten times more efforts and money on maximizing the power of your ATS (or CRM)
2. teach your sourcers the very bottom but the most profound basics of searching and they will become highly productive even with free tools, too
3. educate your sourcers that boring and old-school technology and search methods can simply be amazing and it is the quickest who wins the searching game
4. prove your sourcers that tools are basically nothing but the maximized usage of a tool is everything
5. if you provide a wide-ranged toolkit to your sourcers make sure they first get the right mindset and fully understand only when and for what purpose to use the tool
„you do not shoot with cannon to catch a single sparrow”
11
business case
standard production requires standard procedures
need for high quality control over each production step
production is automatized and repeatable and owned by the sourcer
injected by LEAN waste reduction
continuous process improvement
12
Creating sourcing microsteps 8 sourcing microsteps grouped into 4 action items Candidate Identification
1. Pipeline 2. To Be Contacted
Candidate Connection 3. Contacted
Candidate Engagement 4. Requested More Info 5. Candidate Not Interested 6. Application Received 7. Rejected by Sourcer
Screening & Submissions 8. Candidate Submitted
I
C
E
S
14
I C E S
If C/I is lower... Too many non-contacted candidates
Building pipeline? Conduct talent mapping? Realized late mismatched profiles? Unsure about candidate profile? Misunderstanding/lack of clarity of the job profile? Need to recap on Vacancy Intake?
>95%
15
I C E S
If E/C is lower... Too many non-replied/non-engaged candidates
Contacted non-relevant profiles? Using not good enough email/phone content? Lack of call to action? Overdose? Credibility issue? Country specific? Other reasons (e.g. holiday season)?
>66%
16
I C E S
If S/E is lower... Too many non-submitted candidates
Can sell the position? Can close the deal (call)? Overqualify? Too many unknown info for the candidate? Was not precise enough in searching?
>15%
I C E S
standardized sourcing production control time spend and motion/activity made predict cost spend plan and forecast productivity
channels countries clients
bring in continuous delivery improvement
18
97% Pretty significant profile results Easy-to-connect
71% Good reply rate Common communication channel High no interest ratio (62% of all
engaged) 11% Very low submission rate Hard to sell Hard to close
13 1
I C E S
19
96% Pretty significant profile results* * Based on 60+ different sourcing channels
73% Exceptional reply rate
15% Standard submission rate
9 1
I C E S
20
94% Just OK 1st conversion rate Could find better quality
candidates
81% Excellent reply rate because
contact details are added
21% Semi-active candidates
6 1
I C E S
21
I
C
E
S
client 1 client 2 client 3
70% 99%
46%
35%
98%
82%
23%
The same technician job in 4 countries. A lot of talent pool building, strong employee referral channel. Similar, four Nordics countries.
New client, quite attractive brand but a rather special one. Only Luxembourg-based jobs but the sourcing scope is international.
Mature RPO client, serving some 20+ countries in EMEA. Widely diverse jobs (Engineering, R&D, IT, Sales etc.). Almost unknown brand.
72%
56%
L x
T = SP
# of qualified candidate leads
Quality C/I x E/C x S/E
(conversion rate)
Time spend SOURCING PRODUCTIVITY
Q
24
implementation Training, training, training, training, training, traini..... Give ownership to Sourcers on production Steering on output rather than input Bi-weekly sourcing performance reports Piñata Day
25
piñataday Boost the last conversion rate (S/E) No new leads, no new reqs –> calling only! S/E: 9,6% 15,6% over 10 weeks
28
digital connection/„geek”
<3 social media
somewhere to start...
analytical skills
talking
qualifying
consulting
searching communication
hard working/resilience
sales in the blood
learning
openness/360
responsible
diversity
be very smart
out of the box thinking
social
problem solver
30
implementing into a sourcing world
1. Check what seems to be a general sourcing competency
2. Understand where the best of the best make a significant difference/peaks
3. Look for similarities in the bottom performers’ DNA
31
cognitive capabilities
learning index
verbal skill
verbal reasoning
numeric abality
numeric reasoning
32
12
34
56
78
910
entire Center (#rsrsrc)
top performers
bottom performers
learning index distribution
33
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
12
34
56
78
910
verbal skill (vocabulary)
Extraordinary great sourcers seem to speak less... colorful
34
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
12
34
56
78
910
verbal skill (vocabulary)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
12
34
56
78
910
numeric reasoning (analysis)
Extraordinary great sourcers seem to speak less... colorful
Bottom-end performers may struggle more with data-driven analysis
35
behaviour traits
energy level/multitasking assertiveness
sociability manageability attitude/trust decisiveness
accomodating independance
objective judgement
36
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
energy level
assertiveness
sociability
manageability
attitudedecisiveness
accomodating
independance
objective judgement
first look on the average of the nine behaviour traits – top vs. bottom
37
12
34
56
78
910
12
34
56
78
910
energy level (multitasking)
decisiveness
Extraordinary great sourcers are faster and can well multitask
Bottom-end performers may need more time and info to make a decision
38
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
energy level
assertiveness
sociability
manageability
attitudedecisiveness
accomodating
independance
objective judgement
first look on the average of the nine behaviour traits – all sourcers
39
skills where you are good to have a wide range – build diversity!
Manageability
Attitude
Accomodating
Independance
12
34
56
78
910
40
12
34
56
78
910
objective judgement – strong middle value is the best!
Most top sourcers have middle-value objective judgement skill
42
driver mix – all sourcers
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
enterprising
financial/administrative
people service
scientific/technical
mechanical
creative
43
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
enterprising
financial/administrative
people service
scientific/technical
mechanical
creativecreative
enterprising
people services
driver mix +top performers
44
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
enterprising
financial/administrative
people service
scientific/technical
mechanical
creativecreative
enterprising
people services
driver mix +bottom performers
45
High learning capabilities that both require continuous and quick learning. Top sourcers with high learning will always be on the move to get new ways to recruit
Okay vocabulary is more than perfect. You do not need Shakespeares in this role but the ones that can communicate and negotiate well by using powerful patterns and simpler expressions
Very strong data-analysis skill set, feeling comfortable with numbers and making decisions based on data
Higher energy level will simultaneously run every portion of the wheel in the same time and look for and make quick wins
Strong decisiveness to not be afraid of making quick (and less sure) decisions
Middle objectivity will help constantly balance between the candidates’ story and the HMs’ strict requirements
Most ideally your sourcer have a driver of creativity (approaching problems in a new and colorful way), enterprising (keeping your colleagues in the lead who build and request commitment and dedication to their projects) and people services
sourcer DNA
46
re-fining #rsrsrc recruitment
Testing built into the regular selection procedure (early stage)
Data gathered on 400+ applicants/ employees Attrition is <8% Helped us build and experience competency-
based graph theory
what is the ultimate contribution
of a sourcer?
hire
submission
lead identified
HM interview
recruiter interview
offer
51
I
C
E
S
client 1 client 2 client 3
95%
72%
56%
H 24% 13% 13%
4 8 7
1 hire
11 50 41
98%
82%
23%
99%
46%
35%
*
* in case of real (not talent pooling) positions
sourcer productivity calculator 200+ shares | 1.000+ visitors
thebalazs.com here!
be careful how you set the scene for sourcing!
1. avoid unclarity, avoid confusion!
2. set realistic expectations!
3. communicate, communicate, and communicate!
4. do not just source!
5. never get fulfilled!
try and explain everything what you do as simply and down-to-earth as possible
you may have a standard procedure on how you do things, maybe even SLAs in place – insist to them. you need time to deliver but also feedback once done. you are imperfect but will improve. and you and your client are both out there to make things happen – together
you are the one who gathers more intelligence about current markets, dynamics, candidate behaviors, interest or no-interest reasons and so forth. share it back!
sourcing is in constant change. it is ‘the’ change, itself. you cannot plan with long-term, well-established and robust wins but you can win every single day. a long chain of everyday small victories gives a happy life to a sourcer
sourcers tend to disappear. they often more enjoy their core job than the client-facing elements in that so be proactive in client communication, and always inform your stakeholders in advance, regularly, on where you are heading now and what you will do
to sum it up
managing a sourcing centre is a true business partner role
it’s still a hiring business
it’s all about technology! ...oh wait, it’s not!
sourcing is a standardized procedure...
...but only the very best can run that well!
#5
#4
#1
#2
#3