3.7 foundation engineering.pptx
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
1/110
FoundationEngineering
Lateral Earth Pressure
Theories and RetainingWalls
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
2/110
3.7 Trial Wedge Method for EarthPressure
Step 1- a mass of soil behind the wail is considered as afree body. The force P, which must exist between the free
body and the wall, is found by writing the equation ofequilibrium for the free body as a whole.
Step 2 a dierent free body is considered, having adierent boundary through the soil. nce again therequired force between the wall and the free body is found.
Step 3 the actual force against the !all will be thelargest value of P found as the result of considering all"ossible free bodies.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
3/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
4/110
Deriation of E!uation "# TrialWedge Method for $%tie &ase
#igure below shows the a""lication of the trial !edgemethod to the "roblem of sim"le retaining wall without wallfriction. $ "lanar failure wedge %&' is considered. There aredistributed normal stresses along %& and &' and distributedshear stress along &'. The resultants of these stresses arecarried out in the analysis. The forces acting at the freebody %&' are(
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
5/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
6/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
7/110
Deriation of E!uation "# TrialWedge Method for Passie &ase
The equation is derived as follows. $ "lanarfailure wedge %&' is considered. There aredistributed normal stresses along %& and &' anddistributed along &'. The resultants of these
stresses are carried out in the analysis. %n thiscase, the force # acts above the normal and theangle between the force # and weight ! will be )* +.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
8/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
9/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
10/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
11/110
Most %o,,on ,aterials used forretaining -alls are
- !ood sheets0- teel and "lastic interlocing sheets0
- einforced concrete sheets0
- Precast concrete elements 1crib walls and blocwalls20
- 3losely s"aced in-situ soil-cement "iles0
- !ire-mesh boxes 1gabions20
- $nchors into the soil or roc mass 1soil nailing2.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
12/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
13/110
Rigid Retaining Walls
4nder this category, the wall may be subdividedto four categories.
They are(
5. 6ravity retaining walls7. emi-gravity retaining walls
8. 3antilever retaining walls
9. 3ounterfort retaining walls
:. ;uttressed retaining walls
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
14/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
15/110
&lassi/%ation of Retaining Walls
They can be divided into two ma>or categories(
0a&onentional Retaining Walls
1i2 6ravity etaining !alls Masonry (brick or stone) orPlain concrete
1ii2 emi-gravity etaining !alls - Masonry or Plainconcrete or RCC
1iii23antilever etaining !alls - RCC (Inverted T and L)
1iv23ounterfort etaining !alls - RCC
1v2 ;uttress etaining !alls - RCC
1vi23rib !alls, etc.
0" Me%hani%all# Sta"ilied Earth 0MSE Walls
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
16/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
17/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
18/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
19/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
20/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
21/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
22/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
23/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
24/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
25/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
26/110
2. Se,igrait# Wallso @ot as heavy as gravity walls.
o $ small amount of reinforcement is used forreducing the mass of concrete.
o $ s"ecialiDed form of gravity walls is a semi-gravity retaining wall.
o These have some tension reinforcing steelincluded so as to minimiDe the thicness of thewall without requiring extensive reinforcement.
o They are a blend of the gravity wall and the
cantilever wall designs.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
27/110
3. &antileer Retaining Wallso 3onsist of a relatively thin stemand a base slab.
o
;ase slab is the cantilever "ortion.o ;ase is also divided into two "arts, the heeland toe.
o /eel is the "art of the base under the bac?ll.
o Toe is the other "art of the base.
o esists "ressure due to its bending action.
o 4sually made of reinforced cement concrete 1332.
4se much less concrete than monolithic gravity walls,but require more design and careful construction.
6enerally economical u" to about Em 17: ft.2 to 5Bm
187 ft.2 in height. 3an be "recast in a factory or formed on site.
'ore convenient and relatively economical for design.
anineFs and 3oulombFs theories can be used to ?nd
active earth "ressure on the wall.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
28/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
29/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
30/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
31/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
32/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
33/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
34/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
35/110
5. 'uttressed Wallso imilar to counterfort walls exce"t the bracets or
buttress walls are "rovided on the o""osite sideof the bac?ll.
imilar to 3antilever retaining walls, but thin slabstems may be used at some interval to tie the
base slab and stem in order to reduce the shearforce and bending moment for more economicaldesign
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
36/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
37/110
6. &ri" Walls 3rib walls are made u" of interlocing individual
boxes made from timber or "re-cast concrete. The boxes are then ?lled with crushed stone or
other coarse granular materials to create a freedraining structure.
There are two basic ty"es of crib wall(- Timber, and
- einforced "re-cast concrete.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
38/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
39/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
40/110
7. +a"ion -alls
6abions are multi-celled, welded wire or rectangularwire mesh boxes, which are then roc?lled, andused for construction of erosion control structuresand to stabiliDe stee" slo"es.
Their a""lications include,
- etaining walls,
- ;ridge abutments,
- !ing walls,
- 3ulvert headwalls,
- utlet a"rons,
- hore and beach "rotection walls, and
- Tem"orary chec dams.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
41/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
42/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
43/110
Me%hani%all# Sta"ilied Earth 0MSE Walls
These walls are among the most economical, and mostcommonly constructed.
3ontrary to other ty"es, the 'G walls are su""orted by thesoil, and not the other way around.
They are su""orted by selected ?lls 1granular2 and held
together by reinforcements, which can be either metallicstri"s or "lastic meshes.
The 'G 3ategories are
$2 Panel !alls,
;2 3oncrete ;loc !alls, and
32 Tem"orary Garth !alls
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
44/110
@owadays. The main com"onents of these ty"es ofwalls are
H BackllIwhich is granular soilH Reinforcement in the bac?ll
H $ cover 1or skin2 on the front face
The reinforcement can be thin galvaniDed steel stri"s,geogrid, or geotextile for descri"tions of geogrid and
geotextile2.
%n most cases, "recast concrete slabs are used as sin.The slabs are grooved to ?t into each other so that soilcannot Jow between the >oints.
Thin galvaniDed steel also can be used as sin when thereinforcements are metallic stri"s.
!hen metal sins are used, they are bolted together,and reinforcing stri"s are "laced between the sins.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
45/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
46/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
47/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
48/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
49/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
50/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
51/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
52/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
53/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
54/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
55/110
3. Proportioning of Retaining Walls
!hen designing retaining walls, an engineer mustassume some of the dimensions, calledproportioning, which allows the engineer tochec trial sections for stability.
%f the stability checs yield undesirable results,the sections can be changed and recheced.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
56/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
57/110
Source: BM. Das
$""roximate dimensions for various com"onentsofretaining wall for initial stability checs( 1a2gravity wall0
1b2 cantilever wall Knote( minimum dimension ofis 7 ft 1LB.< m2M
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
58/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
59/110
3.8 Sta"ilit# of Retaining Walls
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
60/110
Sta"ilit# $nal#sis of RWs
The stability of a gravity wall is due to the self weightof the wall and the "assive resistance develo"ed in frontof the wall.
The gravity walls are designed using 3oulombFs theory.
einforced concrete walls 1cantilever or counterfort ty"es2are more economical than the gravity walls because thebac?ll itself "rovides most of the required dead load.
anineFs theory is used to investigate the stability ofreinforced concrete walls 1cantilever or counterfortty"es2 .
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
61/110
T#pes of Sta"ilit# $nal#sis of RW
aE9ternal Sta"ilit# $nal#sis Tochec the safety against liding, verturningand ;earing 3a"acity failure. etaining wallsmust be designed to be stable with res"ect tofour "otential external failure modes(
) global stability,
) base sliding,
) overturning, and
)bearing ca"acity.
' Slidi
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
62/110
'ase Sliding refers to the outwardmovement of the bottom of the retaining wallas a result of the lateral forces generated by
earth "ressure and, if "resent, water "ressure.The force resisting base sliding is the frictionbetween the ?ll in the bottom of ! and thefoundation soil beneath the bottom layer.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
63/110
)erturning refers to the ti""ing over of theretaining wall as it rotates about the toe of the structure.
The overturning force is the sum of each destabiliDing
force times its moment arm. The stabiliDing force, orrighting moment, is the "roduct of the weight of theretaining wall and its moment arm, which is thehoriDontal distance from the toe to the center of gravityof the wall. %f calculations show that the righting moment
is less than required, one o"tion is to increase the front-to-bac dimension of the wall, thereby increasing itsoverall weight and the magnitude of its moment arm.
' i & i
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
64/110
'earing &apa%it# refers to the ability of thefoundation soil to su""ort the weight of the retaining wall"laced u"on it. The analysis is the same as for shallow
foundations. %t is necessary to increase the area of the baseif calculations show that the soil beneath the wall is toowea. This will decrease the "ressure 1force "er unit of area2on the foundation. $nother o"tion is to increase the de"thinto the ground of the retaining wall, thus increasing theability of the foundation soil to resist the im"osed weight.
"*nternal Sta"ilit# $nal#sis
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
65/110
"*nternal Sta"ilit# $nal#sis) To determine the required ! tensile strength,
and the minimum required length to ensure a
rigid behavior in the reinforced bloc.
) efers to the ability of the individual "arts of the
wall to act as a single unit. The wall must bedesigned so that the individual "ieces of the walldo not "ullout, se"arate, or slide a"art. %n amodular bloc wall, the designer must beconcerned with the "otential of the tiebac failing
under tension or "ulling out from the soil.
L l St "ilit $ l i
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
66/110
% Lo%al Sta"ilit# $nal#sis
This analysis is carried out for egmental etaining
!alls to ensure that the column of concrete blocunits remains intact without bulging0 local stabilityanalysis are( facing connection, bulging andmaximum unreinforced height.
d +l " l St "ilit $ l i
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
67/110
d +lo"al Sta"ilit# $nal#sisefers to the stability of the wall, the soil behind it, and
the soil below it. The design engineer must be certain
that the entire area including the wall does notcolla"se. $ thorough soil analysis must be "erformed toeliminate the "ossibility of global failure.
This analysis is "erformed on the overall structureincluding the retained bac?ll and the foundation soil.
This analysis should be "erformed according to theclassical slo"e stability "rocedures, such as ;isho"Fsmodi?ed method of slices.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
68/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
69/110
To design retaining -alls "ro"erly an engineer
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
70/110
To design retaining -alls "ro"erly, an engineermust now the basic soil "arameters-that is, theunit weight, angle of friction, and cohesion-for the
soil retained behind the wall and the soil belowthe base slab.
Nnowing the "ro"erties of the soil behind the wallenables the engineer to determine the lateral"ressure distribution that has to be designed for.
There are two "hases in the design ofconventional retaining walls.
#irst, with the lateral earth "ressure nown, thestructure as a whole is checed for stability.
That includes checing for "ossible overturning,sliding, and bearing ca"acity failures.
econd, each com"onent of the structure ischeced for ade!uate stren"th# and the steelreinforcement of each com onent is determined.
To Design a Retaining Wall We
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
71/110
To Design a Retaining Wall Weshould (no- the Follo-ing
5. #unction of etaining !all Aierent Ty"es #or Aierent
Pur"oses.7. oil Pro"erties
$nit %ei"ht
&n"le of 'riction
Cohesion# C8. Aetermine the tability of the .!.
lidin"
verturnin"
Bearin" Ca*acity verall tability
9. Aesign the etaining !all ections
Check the tren"th
teel Reinforcement or teel Cross section
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
72/110
For%es $%ting on Retaining Wall
5. !eight of ! 1!2
!eight of stem 1!52
!eight of footing or
base or base slab 1!72
7. !eight of soil above the base slab 1!s2
8. !eight of surcharge 1if any2 1!q2
9. $ctive earth "ressure force 1Pa2
:. Passive earth "ressure force 1P"2
1acting in front of wall is usually ignored because of the"ossibility of disturbance, erosion, etc.2
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
73/110
Failure of Retaining Wall
$ retaining wall may fail in any of the followingways(
%t may overturn about its toe. 1ee #ig. a2
%t may slide along its base. 1ee #ig. b2
%t may fail due to the loss of bearin" ca*acity ofthe soil su""orting the base. 1ee #ig. c2
%t may undergo dee"-seated shear failure. 1ee#ig. d.2
%t may go through excessive settlement.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
74/110
1a2by overturning
1b2by sliding
1c2 by bearingca"acity failure
1d2 by dee"-seatedshear failure
Failure of Retaining Wall
Fa%tor of Safet# 0F)S
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
75/110
Fa%tor of Safet# 0F)S
For sta"ilit#; a retaining -all should satisf# the
follo-ing %onditions The wall should be sta"le against sliding. The F)S against
sliding shall "e a ,ini,u, of 1.5.
The wall should be sta"le against oerturning.
#or granular bac?ll, the # against overturning shall be a
minimum of 5.:.#or cohesive bac?ll, the # against overturning shall be a
minimum of 7.
The base of the wall should be sta"le against "earing%apa%it# failure.
#or granular bac?ll, the # against bearing ca"acity failureshall be a minimum of 7.
#or cohesive bac?ll, the factor of safety against bearingca"acity failure shall be a minimum of 8.
The resultant of all the forces should fall within the middle third
of the base.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
76/110
#or each of these considerations, the resisting orsta"iliing or a%tuating for%es must exceed theforces that would cause failure by a "redetermined
# for each of these considerations.
The selected # should reJect the consequences offailure and the designerFs con?dence in the accuracy
of the in"ut "arameters.
The following # are normally used in the design ofgravity retaining walls(
6lobal tability, # O 5.8
;ase liding, # O 5.:
verturning, # O 7.B
;earing 3a"acity, # O 7.B
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
77/110
Sta"ilit# $nal#sis of +rait# RW %n 6ravity !s, the use of the anineFs earth "ressure
theory for stability checs involves drawing a vertical line &Bthrough "oint located at the edge of the heel of the baseslab.
The anineFs active condition is assumed to exist along thevertical "lane&B+
anineFs active earth "ressure equations may then be usedto calculate the lateral "ressure on the face&B of the wall.
%n the analysis of the wallFs stability, the force, Pa (Rankine) , the
weight of soil above the heel, and the weight 1c2 of the
concrete all should be taen into consideration.
The assum"tion for the develo"ment of anineFs active"ressure along the soil face &B is theoretically correct if theshear Done bounded by the line &C is not obstructed by thestem of the wall.
The angle , that the line&C maes with the vertical is
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
78/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
79/110
Deter,ination of LEP on +rait# RW
'
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
80/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
81/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
82/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
83/110
h = f i
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
84/110
&he%= for )erturning
For%es a%ting on a +rait# and a &antileerRW; "ased on the assu,ption that theRan=ine $%tie Pressure is acting along avertical "lane &B drawn through the heel of the
structure.
F)S against oerturning a"out the toe
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
85/110
g g0a"out point !)
)erturning Mo,ent;
To %al%ulate the resisting ,o,ent;0negle%ting ; Pp
The weight of the soil above the heel and the weightof
the concrete 1or masonry2 are both forces thatcontribute
to the resisting moment.
#orce, P$also contributes to the resisting moment.
P% Pa!os&
he moment of the force, Pvabout C is
!here, ; O width of !
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
86/110
+rait# RW
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
87/110
&antileer RW
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
88/110
The usual minimum desirable value of the factor ofsafety with res"ect to overturning is 5.: to 7.
&h = f Slidi l th '
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
89/110
&he%= for Sliding along the 'ase
hear strength of the soil immediately below the base
slab may be re"resented as
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
90/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
91/110
sive force, Ppis also a horiDontal resisting force. /ence
only horiDontal force that will tend to cause the wall to slideivin" force2 is the horiDontal com"onent of the active force,
Therefore,i.e.
'inimum factor of safety of 5.: against sliding is
generally required.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
92/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
93/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
94/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
95/110
The magnitudes of 'toe and 'eel can be
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
96/110
e ag udes o 'toe a d 'eel ca be
determined in the following manner(
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
97/110
#or maximum and minimum "ressures, the valueof # @ 'A2.
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
98/110
Cu,eri%al 1Tae q O :
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
99/110
Tae quO :
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
100/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
101/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
102/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
103/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
104/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
105/110
u,eri%al 2
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
106/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
107/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
108/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
109/110
-
7/25/2019 3.7 Foundation Engineering.pptx
110/110