2012 dia emrs for clinical research
DESCRIPTION
EMR functionality for clinical research has long been dreamed about, but how close to reality is it actually? This presentation lays out some basic facts about the viability (or lack thereof) of using EMRs for Phase 1-3 clinical trials.TRANSCRIPT
EMRs for Clinical Research: Hype versus Reality
Edward S. SeguineCEOClinical Ink
Disclaimer
• The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug Information Association, Inc. (“DIA”), its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils, Special Interest Area Communities or affiliates, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated.
• These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenter and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Drug Information Association, Drug Information Association Inc., DIA and DIA logo are registered trademarks. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
2
Discussion Points• Industry Metrics
• BMS Operational Perspective
• FDA Regulatory Viewpoint
• Novartis Experience
• Recent Industry Activity
Audience Participation REQUIRED
Principle #1
“Everyone is entitled to their own opinions; but they are not
entitled to their own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynihan4 term US Senator from New York
Poll: EDC has DEFINITELY reduced the total cos...
Principle #2
“All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in
logic and argument than others.”
Douglas AdamsAuthor – “Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy”
Poll: EDC has DEFINITELY reduced the total cos...
EMRs for Clinical Research?
Vote via Texting
22333
22333
176644
Poll: My primary work role is:
Practice Poll
Poll: How much was spent on Phase 1-3 Clinical...
Poll #1
Poll #1
How much was spent on Phase 1-3 clinical trials last year?
$40 BILLION$1,200,000 for EVERY employee
involved in clinical trials
Poll: What is the most expensive activity in a...
Poll #2
Source: Medidata CRO Contractor Fact Sheet; June 2012
Total Clinical Trial Costs
29%
26%
18%
12%
6%5% 4%
Monitoring Spend
R&D Spend Monitoring
Phase 1 $5.6B $1.2B
Phase 2 $8.8B $2.7B
Phase 3 $25.4B $7.9B
TOTAL $39.8B $11.8BSource: 2012 PhRMA Industry Report
UNSUSTAINABLE!
Poll: EMRs will replace EDC for eSource in:
Poll #3
EMRs for “Research”
• Applied Clinical Trials Survey:
71% EHR/EDC will merge within 5 years
February 1, 2007
“The possibility of performing a clinical trial with data extracted directly from EHRs was highly impractical and would not likely enter routine use for 15 to 20 years. I now recognize that I significantly underestimated the difficulties.”
Paul Bleicher, DIA Global Forum, Dec 2010
16
EMR CertificationCertification Commission for Health
Information Technology (www.cchit.org)
Published EMR functionality standards for clinical research in 2011
80 Certified EMRs
Poll: What % of EMRs are certified for Clinica...
Poll #3
EMR CertificationCertification Commission for Health
Information Technology (www.cchit.org)
Published EMR functionality standards for clinical research in 2011
80 Certified EMRs
0 for Clinical Research
EMR FunctionalityElectronic Health Records for Clinical
Research (www.ehrcr.org)
Practical Considerations for Sites using EHRs Certified for Clinical Research
74 Pages
User Requirements
Functional Profile (IHE, HL7)
EMR FunctionalityCDASH
Demog, AE, MedHx, ConMed, Physical Exam, VitalsUse of RFD Profile to exchange data with EDC
Capture Audit Trail
Generate PDFs
Password and LogIn Rules
Backup and Recovery
EMR NON-Functionality
HITSP RFD Profile (CAP135)20 of 37 Requirements DO NOT EXIST
CCHIT Certification19 or 35 Requirements DO NOT EXIST
HUGE GAPS
EMR Data QualityComprehensive Literature Review (35 studies)
- Disparity in granularity, format, optional locations, and structure of data
- Accuracy and Completeness differ for Acute versus Chronic conditions
- Medication lists particularly error-prone due to discontinuations
- Lab data the most accurate and complete
- Focus on large academic institutions
1“Electronic Health Records and the Reliability and Validity of Quality Measures”, Medical Care Research and Review, February 2010
EMR Data AvailabilityUniversity of Colorado – Childrens Hospital
1,093 CRF data elements; 47% in the EMR
1“Electronic Health Records and the Reliability and Validity of Quality Measures”, Medical Care Research and Review, February 2010
Data Type % Available in EMR
% of Total Study
Laboratory Tests 100% 18%
Demographics 98% 8%
Medications 74% 9%
Medical History 54% 18%
Trial Diagnostics 21% 19%
Questionairres 0% 28%
Myth of EMR as eSource
EMRs can’t be “ultimate” eSource goal– Viable when trial data is standard of care
– Limited data (demographics, labs, MedHx)
– Unaware of protocol specific requirements
– Inflexible systems – access, audit trail
– Discrepancy between CODING and DISEASE
– Twenty years of experience in the UK?
– Business value is reduced monitoring not data exchange
– 65% of sites are stand-alone practices
Secondary Use of EMRs• Preliminary site identification based on patient
pools
• Reporting of Adverse Events
• Impact of inclusion/exclusion criteria on trial enrollment
BUT, these benefits only accrue IF the EHR data is captured consistently across institutions.
EMRs for Clinical Research?