2010-2011 / building improvement update / may school board meeting

Download 2010-2011 / Building Improvement Update / May School Board Meeting

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: victor-scott

Post on 25-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • 2010-2011 / Building Improvement Update / May School Board Meeting
  • Slide 2
  • Indicator / Student will be able to: BenchmarksResults Assessme nt Kindergarten and 1 st grade readers are able to show evidence of deep thinking as related to the text, show how connections extend their comprehension, are able to explain how schema/connections enrich the understanding of text, and understand that connections extend far beyond the immediate text. 2 nd grade readers are able to show evidence of deep thinking based on background knowledge and authors clues and use predictions, interpretations, and/or conclusions to infer, and convey the process used to deepen their comprehension. Baseline Data Baseline Testing10/11-10/15 49/101 1 st Grade Students (49%) 19/111 2 nd Grade Students (17%) Total: 32% of students scored a 3 or above on the 1 st / 2 nd Grade Common Comp. Assessment K /1 st Grade / 2 nd Grade Common Comp. Assessment 70% Testing12/13-12/22 K 89/118 (75.4%) 1 st Grade 82/106 (77.3%) 2 nd Grade 96/111 (86%) Total Average: 79.5% 80% Testing 3/21-3/25 K- 92/110 83.6% 1 st 97/108 90% 2 nd 92/101 91% Total: 87% of students scored a 3 or 4 on our comprehension assessment 90% Testing May 16 th 20 th
  • Slide 3
  • Pathfinder Elementary Building Improvement Plan 2010-2011 (Reading Level) Measurable Building Goal: 75% of students at Pathfinder Elementary will be reading at an instructional grade level by the end of the school year as measured by either the DRA-2 Word Analysis (Kindergarten) or the DRA, Developmental Reading Assessment, (1 st and 2 nd Grade) benchmarks. Quarterly Targets Indicators: Teachers will be able to: Benchmarks ResultsAssessment / Indicator % Date % By October 15 th 75% of Pathfinder Elementary students will meet their grade level reading benchmark. (Kindergarten 62 / DRA-2 Word Analysis) (1 st Grade DRA Level 4) (2 nd Grade DRA Level 18) Kindergarten second grade teachers will test and then analyze the data to determine areas of concern for reading ability. Students will be placed into reading groups where their specific reading skills will be addressed. Teachers will also utilize the leveled library at Pathfinder to instruct students at their instructional levels. Running records will also be kept on students indicating progress made in their reading ability and to address any areas of weakness. Teachers will access various websites to gather information and lessons for addressing reading ability. Teachers will formulate SMART goals that are specific to students who are not meeting the yearly benchmarks. 75%10/15 K-98 out of 115 (85%) 1 st 85 out of 102 (83%) 2 nd 96 out of 110 (87%) DRA Benchmark By January 21 st 75% of Pathfinder Elementary students will meet their grade level reading benchmark. (Kindergarten -62 DRA-2 Word Analysis) (1 st Grade DRA Level 8) (2 nd Grade DRA Level 20) 75%1/21 K-112 out of 114 (98%) 1 st 73 out of 105 (69%) 2 nd 87 out of 110 (79%) By May 20 th 75% of Pathfinder Elementary students will meet their grade level reading benchmark. (Kindergarten 162 DRA-2 Word Analysis) (1 st Grade DRA Level 16) (2 nd Grade DRA Level 28) 75% Testing Week of: 5/9-5/20
  • Slide 4
  • Professional development on running records Pull data from running records to create intervention plans Tutoring Frequent regrouping of small reading groups Tier three reading intervention (one-on-one instruction) Ability grouping between grade level
  • Slide 5
  • StandardQuarter 1Quarter 2 Mid-TermQuarter 3 Concepts of Print78% 96% Identifies Letter Sounds15%50% 80% Recognition of Alphabet72%87% 98% Identifies High Frequency Words4% 71% Capitalization9% 70% Letter Formation19% 72% Writes Legibly15% 76% Count to 10036%38% 80% 1 to 1 Correspondence to 2078% 97% Identifies Numbers 0-3143%58% 90% Writes Number 0-3143% 90% Continue / Create Patterns91% 99% Applies Reading Strategies -- 81% Story Elements-- 93% Applies Comprehension Strategies-- 81% Comprehends Text-- 74% Follows Writing Process-- 71% Composes Text-- 74% Ideas Stays on Topic-- 84% Compare/Measure Objects-- 96% Shapes-- 87% Semi-Phonetic Spelling-- 83% Ending Punctuation-- 63% Addition-- - Subtraction-- - Identify Money-- - Value of Money-- - Time-- -
  • Slide 6
  • Standard1st Quarter2nd Quarter Mid-Term3 rd Quarter Applies Consonants, Digraphs, and Blend Sounds 66%67%78% Applies Vowel Sounds 64%62%76% Applies Phonetic Strategies 65%64%83% Automatically Reads High-Frequency Words 79%85%89% Correctly Uses Conventions 30%38%77% Writes Complete Sentences 39%47%87% Accurately Spells Words in a Variety of Settings 72%66%85% Uses Handwriting Skills to Write Legibly 85%84%85% Uses a Variety of Comprehension Strategies --77% Demonstrates Knowledge of a Variety of Test Features --79% Read, Write, Compare to 100 57%62%89% Addition 80%79%88% Continue/Create Patterns 94%95%94% Skip Counting -77%93% Problems Solving --86% Subtraction --84% Time --84% Money --66% Units of Measurement --- Graphs/Data --95% Shapes --95% Fractions --94%
  • Slide 7
  • StandardQuarter 1 Quarter 2 Mid- Term Quarter 3 Comprehends Fiction46% 86% Comprehends Nonfiction--87% Applies Phonetic Strategies71% 93% Reads with Fluency, Accuracy, and Expression52% 80% Composes a well-developed text--84% Uses Conventions Correctly37% 79% Spelling62% 88% Read, Write, and Compare to 1000--- Regrouping-Addition--96% Regrouping-Subtraction--93% Problem Solving--93% Continue/Create Patterns--94% Time--97% Addition27%35%69% Subtraction4%9%31% Money--91% Units of Measurement--- Graphs/Data--98% Shapes--96% Fractions---
  • Slide 8
  • Team meetings Focus on standards that fell below benchmark quarterly and mid-term Discuss progress monitoring Small group interventions (reading and math) Tutoring
  • Slide 9
  • Through the implementation of SW-PBIS Pathfinder Elementary will reduce buddy room referrals and office referrals by 10% each quarter for the 2010-11 school year BenchmarkResults 1 st Quarter: Baseline Data75 Office or Buddy Room Referrals 2 nd Quarter: Reduce By 10% (67.5 Referrals) 83 Office or Buddy Room Referrals 3 rd Quarter: Reduce By 10% (60.75 Referrals) 61 Office or Buddy Room Referrals 4 th Quarter: Reduce By 10% (54 Referrals) Currently As Of 5/10/11 = 31 Referrals
  • Slide 10
  • Triage Groups Pirate Time Daily Reinforcements Character BINGO PBIS Team Meetings Tier Two Interventions Behavior Contracts/Plans
  • Slide 11