16th appeal order - ncte : national council for teacher...

ORDER

S~. '.1~~<~'..u:~'''eTC

F.NO.89-412/E-5128/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

Date \ l,I\t1\)WHEREAS the appeal of R.I.E.T. Vidyapeeth, Pohli, Sardhana Road, Sardhana, Uttar

Pradesh dated 18.05.2017 is against the Order No.,.NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201615480IDiploma in Elementary Education [D.EI.Ed.]lUP/2017-:-18/2;

dated 29/03/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting

D.EI.Ed. course on the grounds that "The institution has yet not submitted the latest Non-

Encumbrance certificate issued by the Competent Authority indicating that the land is free

from all encumbrances. The submitted NEC is only up to the year 2011. Hence, the

Committee decided that the application is rejected and recognition/permission is refused u/s

1,4/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution."

'i'; AND WHEREAS Sh. Ankur Agarwal, Adm. Officer and Sh. Sandeep Nagar,

Accountant, R.I.E.T. Vidyapeeth, Pohli, Sardhana Road, Sardhana, Uttar Pradesh presented

the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal

presentation it was submitted that ''The appellant is a renowned Educational Trust popularly

~nbwn as Shri Tirupati Educational Welfare Trust, Meerut and has an appreciable contribution

in the promotion of general Professional Education in the District. The Trust is basically

~triving hard to start an additional Course in D.EI.Ed. in its existing College for the benefit of

the students in and around the area and imparting quality Education for which all the

~.ecessary infrastructure and facilities as required under the NCTE Norms was constructed

",sing all the Financial Resources that were contributed by the Society/Trust Members. That

the Shri Tirupati Educational Welfare Trust, Meerut has already sent the reply of SCN issued

dated 02/03/2017 on 07.03.2017 by speed post along with the relevant documents as desired

p'y the members of the NRC, NCTE, Jaipur. That the latest Non-Encumbrance Certificate is1

again being submitted for your kin'a consideration. In the light of the facts explained along

w.ith the supporting documents above by the appellant. Impugned order of the NRC in its.., ~,'

S:rnergency Meeting cannot form any bona-fide and prima face ground for the closure of

~9urse file of RIET Vidyapeeth, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, thus needs to be quashed.",.",'~:~"

f=:'

\ Y"lto,.,-'

-';~.,.•l1. ~'.,:.-

,..•.tf

AND WHE I,EAS Appeal Committee noted that applicant institution already stands

recognised for con~ucting B.Ed. & D.EI.Ed. programme with an annual intake of 100 seats

each since the years 2009 and 2016 respectively. After submission of online application dateS

31.05.2016 seekinb recognition for additional intake of D.EI.Ed programme, a Show Caus~

Notice (SCN) dat~d 02,03.2017 was issued to appellant institution on grounds of 'non

submission of Lat,.t Non Encumbrance Certificate (NEC) for Khasra No. 1687.' Appellant il1

reply to SCN agai

1submitted NEC dated 06.03.2011 which he understood to be the latest

. .~,...one as possessed by him. Appellant after noting the decision, taken by NRC to reject th~

application, in the 66th Meeting held from 21 5t to 24th March, 2017 sent another letter to NR;2

dated 04.04.20171 enclosing therewith a certificate issued by Sub Registrar, Sardhana

(Meerut) intimatind that there is no encumbrance found on Khasara No. 1687. The appellaot

also submitted co~y of this NEC before Appeal Committee otherwise found to be availabl~I

on the regulatory file. Appeal Committee, therefore, decided to remand back the case to NRCI :

for further processing of the applications. .H'

AND WHEkEAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documents

available on recorbs an~ considering the oral a~guments advanced during the hearing, th~

Committee conclu~ed that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC for further processing

the case.:.,i

NOW TH8REFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of R.I.E.T.I

Vidyapeeth, Pohli, Sar'dhana Road, Sardhana, Uttar Pradesh to the N~C, NCTE, fornecessary action! as indicated above.

(Sanjay AwasthiMember Secretary

1. The Secre ary, R.I.E.T. Vidyapeeth, Pohli, Sardhana Road, Sardhana - 250341,Uttar Prad

jsh

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolI

Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.3. Regional director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II, L1C

Building, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar

Pradesh, Liuckno,w

./

ORDER

~~ .....",erEF.No.89-413/E-5201/2017Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan,Wing II, 1, BahadurshahZafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

Date: If:>' '6f , }WHEREAS the appeal of Edify Institute of BTC, Shahzadpur, Pauri, Mathura, Uttar

Pradesh dated 22.05.2017 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-15198/266th

Meeting (Part-2)/2017/170182 dated 03/04/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee,

refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds that "V.T. visited the

institution on 11.05.2016. The institution refused for inspection. Accordingly, the institution

was given SCN dated 09.09.2016. reply submitted by the institution dated 15.02.2017 is

pot accepted."

AND WHEREAS Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta, Director, Edify Institute of BTC,

Shahzadpur, Pauri, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution

on 25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that Sh.

Harsh Bhaskar, Chairperson of the society met with an accident on 10.05.2016 and was

~amitted in a Hospital. The mobile phone was also lost and so due to non communication

with the Inspection Team, Inspection could not be conducted."

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that the Visiting Team Members had

recorded an observation dated 19.05.2016 stating that "Chairman of Edify College Mr.

Harsh Bhaskar was informed on his Telephone No. 9412255438 that his college will be

inspected between 16th May, 2016 to 18th May 2016 but he disagreed for the Inspection."(:

AND WHEREAS since V'T. was able to communicate with Sh. Harsh Bhaskar and

~ould not get a positive response for inspection, the refusal order on the ground that\"";',Ipstitution refused for Inspection' is justified. Clause 7(7) of the NCTE Regulations, 2014

stipulates that inspection shall not be subject to the consent of the institution. Appeal

~ommittee, therefore, decided to confirm the impugned refusal order dated 3.4.2017

issued by NRC, Jaipur.

I.

\.',

".

~!.~.

'.

~.,

AND WH,REAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, th~

documents available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the

hearing, the c~mrittee concluded that the NRC was justified in refusing recognition an:~

therefore, the ap1eal deserved to be rejected and the order of the NRC is confirmed. ,;,!.

NOW THE~EFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.,

(Sanjay Awasthi)Member Secretary

1. The Principal, Edify Institute of BTC, Shahzadpur, Pauri, Mathura - 282211,I

Uttar Pradesh,.'I

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation 1& Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. ' !

3. Regional IDirector, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II;L1C Buildirlg, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of UttarPradesh, Uucknow. .

..,. /'

"

gNCTE

F.No.89-415/E-5368/2017Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION


ORDERDate: \ 611 0 1 ,~

(i)I"~

e':'. (ii)

(iii)

(iv)

WHEREAS the appeal of Pandit Mahaveer Prasad Tripathi Mahavidyalaya,

Vijapur, Sadar, Uttar Pradesh dated 24.05.2017 is against the decision taken in 267th

Meeting by the Northern Regional Committee, to refuse recognition for conducting

D.EI.Ed. course on the grounds that "The applicant institution has not submitted the reply

of the SCN issued by the NRC on 02.03.2017 within the stipulated time. Hence, the

Committee decided that the application is rejected and recognition/permission is refused

u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution."

"AND WHEREAS Sh. M. Chaturvedi, President and Sh. Sanjay Srivastava,

Representative, Pandit Mahaveer Prasad Tripathi Mahavidyalaya, Vijapur, Sadar, Uttar

'\pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal

and during personal presentation following documents were submitted:

Nac dated 04.01.2017 issued by Mahatama Gandhi Kashi Vidya Peeth,

Varanasi.

Affiliation letter dated 15.09.2014 to prove composite status.

Certified copy of land documents.

Building plan.

'; AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated

02.03.2017 was issued to appellant institution seeking written representation within 21

days and the decision taken by NRC in its 267th Meeting held between 5th to 7th Appeal,

2017 to refuse recognition on the ground of non submission of reply by the appellant

institution was in haste. But never the less the appellant had submitted online application

on 27.05.2016 seeking recognition for B.EI.Ed. programme without obtaining Nac from

the affiliating body. Clause 5(3) of NCTE Regulation, 2014 provide that application shall

be submitted alongwith NaC issued by concerned affiliating body and clause 7(1) of the,',

~.,, .

II

Regulation stipul .te that lin case an application is not complete, or requisite documents

are not en~lose,dllvith application, it shall be treated as incomplete, and rejected. ;~

I';'":AND WH REAS in the instant case NOC was issued by affiliating body on

. 4.1.2017 which in no way could have been enclosed with the application dated 27.5.2016.

Appeal committej' therefore, decided to confirm the impugned decision taken by NRC in

its 267th meeting held from 5th to 7th April, 2017. ".

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, the

documents availJble on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during th~

hearing, the Com1mittee concluded that the NRC was justified in refusing recognition and

therefore, the apJeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the NRC is confirmed. ":.I ~

NOW THBREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.

( anjay Awasthi .Member Secretary

1. The Manager, Pandit Mahaveer Prasad Tripathi Mahavidyalaya, Vijapur,Sadar - 231001, Uttar Pradesh

2. The secre',tary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. . '

3. Regional !Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1C BUildifg, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan,.:

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of UttarPradesh, ~ucknow.

. r:,

.j

.!

..

R" • • .• ~fo':II't.~, ~:.rr*'t

HCere

F.No.89-416/E-5442/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Shawan, Wing II, 1, Sahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

ORDER

WHEREAS the appeal of Tagore Teachers Training College, Kekri, Tagore Nagar,'.Ajmer Road, Kekri, Rajasthan dated 25.05.2017 is against the Order No.

NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201616328/B.A.B.Ed./B.Sc.B.Ed. - 4 Year Integrated/RJ/2017-

18/2 dated 29/03/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for. .

conducting B.A. B.Ed./B.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds that "The institution has not

submitted the following documents. (i) The certified registered land documents issued by

the Registering Authority or civil authority concerned. (ii) Land Use Certificate issued by

tre Competent Authority to use the land for educational purpose. (iii) Non-Encumbrance

~ertificate issued by the Competent Authority indicating that the land is free from all't.

~ncumbrances. Hence, the Committee decided that the application is rejected and

recognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any,

be returned to the institution."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Govind Acharya, Secretary and Dr. Ved Prakash Sharma,

Principal, Tagore Teachers Training College, Kekri, Tagore Nagar, Ajmer Road, Kekri,

H'Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal

c~md during personal presentation it was submitted that "NRC had not objectively

4:onsidered and appreciated the detailed reply submitted by appellant in response to

i\he show cause notice. The impugned decision is not sustainable for the reason that

appellant had submitted the Non-encumbrance certificate with its reply, however, for

''''ready reference and perusal of the appellate authority a copy of Non-Encumbrance

certificate issued by competent authority is enclosed, Similarly, the conversion of land

use i.e. conversion of land for educational purposes issued by competent Authority is

.'enclosed. Institution again places on record copy of registered land document issued('..,by competent authority. In view of the reply to show cause notice as well as in view of

.....'8ocuments placed on record with present appeal, it is apparent that no deficiency exists(,

. r

'T'Hits application deserves to be processed further an~;~

': ~.,Jr-'

'.i~

.:-:

with appellant i I stitution and

recognition be granted to it."

I ,AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that appellant institution submitted

online apPlicatio~ dated 13.06.2016 seeking recognition for grant of 4 year Integrate~

programme of B.A. B.Ed.! B.Sc. B.Ed. Appeal Committee noted that in the onlin~

application the najme of parent society i.e. 'Tagore Bal Niketan Samiti Kekri' has no whe~~,

been mentioned whereas the documents enclosed with the online application such asm....•. ,

certificate of Registration of Society and (ii) Land documents do mention the name 'of.if:,

Society. The appellant institution is already conducting B.Ed. and D.EI.Ed. programme~I .

recognised by the NCTE.

I . ~AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noting that a reply to SCN was submitted by

appellant institutibn on,21.03.2017 has reason to believe that a SCN was issued which

otherwise could ~ot be located on the relevant regulatory file. The documents sUbmitte~

by the appellant ih reply to SCN were not considered to be satisfactory. Appellant duri~~

the course of apJeal presentation on 25.08.2017 submitted copies of Non Encumbran~~,.}

Certificate (NEC) and Land Use Certificate both dated 21.04.2017 issued by Tehsildar'

Kekri. The institution is already recognised for B.Ed. & D.EI.Ed. programmes and is

situated within t1e jurisdiction of Nagar Palika, Kekri. supports these documents. A,~regards certified G:0PYof land documents, the applicant IStime and agam enclOSing zerox

copy of the certifibd land documents instead of original certified land documents. Appe':l.l

Committee is of Jhe opinion that submission of zerox copy and not the original certifi~9

copy of land docJments alone in respect of an existing institution should not be held as,~I :.l\.

valid ground for refusal. .

AND WHJREAS Since the appellant institution has applied for 4 year Integrate:

course of B.A. BlEd.! B.Sc. B.Ed., it would have been more important for the Regional

Committee to hate verified whether the appellant institution is well equipped to fulfil the

condition laid doJn in para 1.1 of Appendix 13 of the Norms and Standards for the 4 year,

programme. If tht appellant institution can satisfy integrating general studies comprisin~.,

Science (B.Sc., B.Ed.) and Social Sciences or Humanities (B.A, B.Ed.) and profession?I,;

studies compriSi~9 foundation of education, pedagogy of school subjects and maintain?,

balance between theory and practice, the application may be processed further. With the

above observation the case is remanded back to NRC. Appellant institution is required to

submit to NRC, Jaipur original certified copy of land documents within 15days of the issue

of appeal orders.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documents

available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC for further

processing of the application. Appellant institution is required to submit to NRC, Jaipur

original certified copy of land documents within 15 days of the issue of appeal orders.

The Secretary, Tagore Teachers Training College, Kekri, Tagore Nagar,Ajmer Road, Kekri - 305404, Rajasthan.The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofRajasthan, Jaipur.

,r~

-:r"1.

" ..::2.,.

!

3.

~1

4.


NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of TagoreTeachers Training College, Kekri, Tagore Nagar, Ajmer Road, Kekri - 305404,Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

f.'

~.I.

I.

S~• "~IO'Jl"'I.~'\ .:.r~

HeTE


Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

'1" ORDERDate: 'b\ \ t>]1 i-

"':. WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Ramprasad Bohara College, Buhana, Rajasthan

dated 23.05.2017 is against the Order No.

NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201616551/B.A.REd.lB.Sc.B.Ed, - 4 Year Integrated/RJ/2017-

18/2 dated 29/03/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for"

conducting B.A. B.Ed.lB.Sc, REd. course on the grounds that "The institution has

submitted two LUCs regarding Khasra no. 2480/2171 and 2479/2171 which show that

converted land is only 2500 sq. mtr. It is not sufficient for existing as well as proposed.<courses. Hence, the Committee decided that the application is rejected and

~ecognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any,


,'AND WHEREAS Sh. Manoj Kumar, Lecturer and Sh. Jitendra Yadav, Secretary, Shri

'Ramprasad Bohara College, Buhana, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant

institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was

C'submittedthat "We have applied LUCs regarding Khasra no. 2480/2171 and 2479/2171

:~'6ftotal land area 5000 sq. mtrs. but at the time of reply of show cause notice we had

(received LUC of 2500 sq. mtr. only which we submitted. LUC of another 2500 sq. mtr.

'was pending at that time. we will show the LUC for total 5000 sq. mtr. land at the time

of hearing. we have got 5000 sq. mtrs. of land converted with us."

AND WHEREAS Appe~1 Committee noted submission made by appellant with

regard to the institution conducting degree course (B.A., B.Sc., B.Com) since 2003 and

80st Graduate Courses since 2006. The appellant during the course of appeal

p.~~sentationalso submitted Land Use Certificate dated 04.08.2017 issued by Tehsildar,

B;ahana, Dist. Jhunjhunu. According to the CLU, land measuring 5000 Sq. Meters owned

by the applicant society has been converted for being used for educational purpose., I

aT':~

AND WHE1

,EAS Appeal Committee noting the development, decided to rema~?

back the caseto NRC, Jaipurforfurther processing of the application. Appellant institution

is requ;r~d to "maJe available a copy of land use certificate to NRC, Jaipur within 15 day1of the issue of ap~eal orders.

AND WHElEAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documen::

available on reco~ds 'and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,

the Committee cdncluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC for further~: ?

processing of the application. Appellant institution is required to submit a copy of Lang: ,

Use Certificate to NRC within 15 days of the issue of Appeal Orders..n

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of ShriRamprasad Bohbra College, Buhana - 333502, Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, fQfnecessary actio~ as indicated above. '


1. The Secretary, Shri Ramprasad Bohara College, Buhana - 333502, Rajasthan2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School

Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.I

3. Regional [i)irector, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1CBuildin1g,Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The SecrJtary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofRajasthan, Jaipur.

'J

S~',.~~",,\, ,.:.n.• 't

Here:


Hans Shawan,Wing II, 1, Sahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

ORDER

WHEREAS the appeal of Yaduvanshi College of Education, Sohali, Buhana -

Mahendergarh Road, Buhana, Rajasthan dated 23.05.2017 is agains"t the Order No.

NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201616378/B.A.B.Ed./B.Sc.B.Ed. - 4 Year Integrated/RJ/2017-

18/2; dated 11/04/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for. "

conducting B.A. B.Ed./B.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds that "The institution has

submitted photo copy of certified land documents issued by registering authority, but

original copy not submitted. The institution has not submitted the approved Building plan

signed by the Competent Govt. Authority indicating the name of the course, name of the

institution, Khasra No./Plot No., total land area, total built-up area and the measurements

df the Multi-purpose Hall as well as the other infrastructural facilities such as class rooms

etc. Hence, the Committee decided that the application is rejected and, (


6e returned to the institution."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Satish Kumar, Secretary and Sh. Karmveer, Lecturer,

Yaduvanshi College of Education, Sohali, Buhana - Mahendergarh Road, Buhana,

Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal

ahd during personal presentation it was submitted that "By mistake our institution have

hOt submitted the original copy of certified land documents issued by the registering

giJthority because we were under the impression that the photocopy is to be submitted,. (nowever the original copy is with us and we will show the same during hearing. The

institution has already got the approved building plan signed by the government authority

indicating the name of the course, name of the institution, Khasara No. Plot No. total~. "

land area, total build-up area and the measurements of the Multipurpose hall as well as

the other infrastructural facilities such as classroom etc as the institution is already"'Hinning bachelor of education 4units since 2008 the institution have submitted the/.,n~:

(:-

....

certificate of the same certified by the competent authority. we will submit the original

building plan at the time of hearing." :1

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that impugned refusal order dated,

11.04.2017 was issued on two grounds namely: ;!li) Non submission of original certified land documents. i~

u,1;;:

ii) Non submission of approved building plan signed by competent authority')to"

indicating the name of course, Khasra No. / Plot number, total proposed"

built up area, measurement of multipurpose hall and other infrastructural

facilities. :$

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committed noted that appellant institution is already

conducting B.Ed. & D.EI.Ed. programme since 2007. Appellant during the course of''1

appeal presentation on 25.08.2017 showed copy of original certified copy of la;'~!.:.\

documents and a building plan containing necessary details. Appellant was advised "fbsubmit these documents to NRC as and when required. ~;'

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee, however, noted that appellant institution i.s

not affiliated for conducting degree course and thus apparently does not fulfil the

requirement of para 1.1. of Appendix 13 of the Norms and Standards for 4 year Integrated

programme which aims at integrating general studies comprising science (B.Sc. B.Ed)'ty

and social sciences or humanities (B.A. B.Ed.), and professional studies comprisingt-s:

foundation of education.I~

7'1

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee after noting the facts of the case, decided to

remand back the case to NRC for revisiting the matter after the appellant submits original

certified copy of land documents and copy of approved building plan within 15 days of the

issue of appeal orders. NRC should, however, keep in view Para 1.1 of Appendix 13 of

the Norms and Standards for 4 year Integrated programme.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documenis~

available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,!

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC for revisiting

the matter after the appellant submits original certified copy of land documents and copy

.,!_'.

of approved building plan within 15 days of the issue of appeal orders. NRC should,

however, keep in view Para 1.1 of Appendix 13 of the. Norms and Standards for 4 year

Integrated programme.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case ofYaduvanshi College of Education, Sohali, Buhana - Mahendergarh Road, Buhana- 333515, Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

t: (Sanjay Awasthi)Member Secretary

1. The Manager, Yaduvanshi College of Education, Sohali, Buhana -Mahendergarh Road, Buhana - 333515, Rajasthan

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolY Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofRajasthan, Jaipur.

"',."I

S~-<.J,..-.f~-.ot\' ,~••.,.'""IHeTE



ORDERDate: ,<::., \ t>ll q-

WHEREAS the appeal of Indian Institute of Education, Naul, Shyampur, West Bengal

dated 25.05.2017 is against the Order No. ER/7-208.8.11/ERCAPP3237/(B.Ed.)/2016/44862

dated 22/03/2016 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed .

. course on the grounds that "(i) The land documents (Registered land deed) is in the name of S.K.

Golam Ehiya i.e. in the name of individual which is not acceptable as per NCTE Regulation 2014.

In view the above, the committee decided as under: The committee is of the opinion that

application bearing code No. ERCAPP3237 of the institution regarding recognition for B.Ed. is

refused under section 14(3)(b) of NCTE Act, 1993."

AND WHEREAS Sh. S.K. Golam Ehiya, Secretary and Sh. Rafik Ali Khan,U:.

Representative, Indian Institute of Education, Naul, Shyampur, West Bengal presented the case0~of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was(;{

submitted that "The applicant Trust, submitted its online application for grant of recognition forI,'

the academic session 2016-17 on 30/05/2015 for D.EI.Ed. programme (ERCAPP3235) with an

annual intake for 50 (one basic unit) and for B.Ed. programme (ERCAPP3237) with annual intake:::.,of 100 (two basic units) as a composite institute in the name of "Indian Institute of Education"

under "Ankur Educational and Welfare Trust". Relevant documents and an application fee of

R,s.3,00,000/- (Rs. 1, 50,000/- each programme) by local courier. The application trust obtained

NOC from West Bengal Board of Primary Education and the University of Calcutta in the nameq(qf[the Institution" besides, all other relevant documents including building plan in favour of the(~; .i(:lstitution/trust. The applicant trust, in its reply dated 11/02/2016 against show cause notice

vide proceedings of 202nd Meeting held on 18th_23rd January 2016 by ERC, NCTE,

Bhubaneswar, submitted in its written submission alongwith relevant documents with a prayer

Q.~ consideration for both the applications, which was unfortunately not considered by ERC,c'"NCTE. The applicant trust, at the time of submitting online application was in possession of

3723.08 sq. mts. (92.734 decimal) of Land and 3553.75 sq. mts. of Built-up area in the name of

the institute "Indian Institute of Education" which satisfied the norms for composite institution as~"",prr NCTE Regulation, 2014. The applicant Trust, before its online application, having all('!:

~ignificant documents (Land Position Certificate, Land Mutation Certificate, Non-Encumbrance~:f.

,.c.

(

Certificate, etc. issued by concerned BL & LRO, Govt. of West Bengal) in the name of the "Indian

Institute of Educatibn" to establish its land position/ownership in favour of the institution. Hence

such a" point ~an't de ground of rejection. The applicant Trust found an order passed by Hon'ble .

Appeal Committee vide F.No. 89-168/2016 Appeal/7th Meeting-2016, dated 04/07/2016 filed by

one Dr. Grahams H1omes,Kalimpong, Darjeeling, West Bengal, wherein the case was remanded

back to ERC, NCTE with undermentioned observation/facts/ground: "... Committee further noted

the submission mabe by the appellant stating that land was allotted to the founder member o}.,

the society during +rlY years of last century. The appellant institution has furnished copy of lan~

title certificate issued by paying fee to District Sub-Registrar, Darjeeling, Certificates issued byI

Dist. Land & Land reforms officer and Non-Encumbrance Certificate issued by Block Land and

Land Reforms Officer, Kalimpong also support the fact that land is recorded in the name of

Kalimpong also suJport the fact that land is recorded in the name of Dr. Graham's Homes Board'

of Management. ~ppeal Committee is of the opinion that registered land documents does not

necessarily mean CIOpyof sale deed of land documents registered in the office of Registrar/Sub-

Registrar. Legal oJnershiP and possession of land can also be through land allotment or som~

other certificates isbued by competent authority .... ". ERC, NCTE without consideration of th~"

facts and docume~ts including affidavit/undertaking rejected both the applications of D.EI.Ed~

(ERCAPP3235) I Programme vide order No. ER/7~

208.8.12/ERCAPP3235/(D. EI.Ed. )/2016/44868, dated 22/03/2016 and B.Ed. (ERCAPP3237)

Programme vide orber No. ER/7-208.8.11/ERCAPP3237/(B.Ed.)/2016/44862, dated 22/03/2016I

applied for the academic session 2016-17 with liberty to file an appeal to the Applicant InstitutionI

as per NCTE Act, 1993. ERC, NCTE, after passing of 9 month 10 days (approx.) from the receipt

of the hard cOPiesl of the online application (12/06/2015) to issuance of rejection order/(s)

(22/03/2016) ultimJtelY refused both the applications for D.EI.Ed. (ERCAPP3235) programm~,I . }.and B.Ed. (ERCAP.P3237) Programme. The applicant trust submitted the facts that NCTE

issued public noticl dated 9th March 2016 inviting online application for the academic sessionI

2017-18, however it was also noted on the NCTE Public Notice that "In case of Tamil Nadu and

West Bengal the d~cision about restriction on the TE courses shall be taken on receipt of theI '

input of the respective State Govt." it is to be observed that the Government of West Bengal did

, not provide any relommendation to NCTE regarding ban for the academic session 2017-18.I

Hence, the applicaht Trust/Institute has lost the opportunity to file a fresh application for theI .

academic session 2017-18. The applicant Trust also submitted the facts that NCTE issuedI .

public notice deciding not to invite/accept applications for the academic session 2018-19 for'

grant of teacher tr~ining institutions/programmes, published in the NCTE website http://ncte-

india.org. Thus, thelAPPlicant Trust/Institute has lost all the opportunity to file a fresh application

for the academic se~sion 2018-19. The applicant trust affirms that "Indian Institute of Education"I

- ,~II

has diligently portrayed its true position of the land and building on the aforementioned address.

Hence the applicant trust submitted its prayer for condoning the delay and allows/reconsiders." ". ' ~. :.

the Appeal Application. The applicant trust found proceedings from internet (NCTE website),

where the Hon'ble Appeal Committee considered many cases and reverted back the matter to

the ERC, NCTE for reconsideration, analogous to the Applicant Trust/Institution. The Applicant).;

,Trust/Institute had no other alternative but to file an Appeal under Section 18 of the NCTE Act

1'993, with clean hand before the Hon'ble Appeal Committee to save the future of the institute.

The applicant trust/institute thus seeks for reconsideration of the case with the provision for

remanding back to the ERC, NCTE for further processing of the applications."h

AND WHEREAS appellant requested for condoning the delay in preferring appeal as

secretary of the institution was seriously ill during the period. Appeal Committee decided to

dondone the delay an~ take up the appeal on its merits.

~:' AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that rejection order is only on the ground that

'Cand documents are in the name of SK Golam Ehiya i.e. in the name of individual which is not

acceptable.' Appeal Committee noted that the name of Sh. Golam Ehiya is mentioned as

Secretary of the Indian Institute of Education in all the sale deed documents including the Memo

bf consideration. To support the possession and ownership of land by the 'Indian Institute of

Education', the applicant had furnished following documents:

i) Non Encumbrance Certificate dated 13.11.2013 issued by Block Land and Land

Reforms Officer, Howrah.:1>,',' ii)--:

;'l-;'

iii)

r iv)u-

v)

Change of Land Use Certificate dated 29.10.2013 issued by office of Sub Divisional

Land and Land Reforms Officer, Uluberia, Howrah.

Land Possession Certificate dated 28.05.2015 issued by Block Land and Land

Reforms Officer, Shymapur-II, Howrah.

Building Plan in the name of India Institute of Education approved on 22.05.2015 by

Nirman Sahayak, Nakole Gram Panchayat.

Building Completion Certificate dated 19.01.2016 issued by Asstt. Enginner, Howrah

Zila Parishad.

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee after going through the details of case does not have

any iota of doubt about the ownership of land which rests with the 'Indian Institute of Education'.

Appeal Committee, therefore, decided to set aside the impugned refusal order dated 22.3.2016

and remand back the case to ERC, Bhubaneshwar for further processing of the case .. -,." .."

,I

r-, ..

"


available on reco+s and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, t~',

Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to ERC for further processing~~f.

the case. lQI

NOW THE~EFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Indian Institute ofEducation, Naul, Shyampur - 711312, West Bengal to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary actionas indicated abov'e. '. r--

( anjay Awasthi)Member Secreta~y

1. The Secretflry, Iridian Institute of Education, Naul, Shyampur- 711312, West Beng~l.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School'

Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.i ,

3. Regional ~irector, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli,Bhubaneshi""ar - 751 012. .

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal,Koltaka. ~

.~I"

S~'":.:.4;:;C~E•.lI'C"'l:: J •


Hans Bhawan,Wing II, 1, BahadurshahZafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

ORDERDate: t b1 'Dll 1-

~',; WHEREAS the appeal of Vinayak P.G. Degree College, Shivsinghpura,

Nawalgarh Road, Sikar, Rajasthan dated 24.05.2017 is against the Order No... 'NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201615121/B.A.B.Ed./B.Sc.B.Ed. - 4 Year Integrated/RJ/2017-

:\'" .

18/2; dated 11/04/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for

conducting B.A. B.Ed./B.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds that "The institution has not

submitted following documents. LUC of Khasra No. 645/1 as mentioned in online

application not submitted. The institution has submitted LUC of Khasra No. 719/1. The

institution has not submitted the Non-Encumbrance certificate issued by the Competent.•. :.~Authority indicating that the land is free from all encumbrances. Hence, the Committee

~ecided that the application is rejected and recognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15

(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution.""

"

AND WHEREAS Sh. Abhishek Sharma and Sh. Hemant Jangir, Representative,

~5Vinayak P.G. Degree College, Shivsinghpura, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar, Rajasthan

presented the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal and during

'personal presentation it was submitted that "Application has already forwarded to NRC

~therequired documents."

l..? AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that appellant institution in reply to the

Show Cause Notice (SCN) as well as during appeal presentation has submitted copies

of i) Land Use Certificate dated 03.02.2014 for Khasra No. 645/1 and Non Encumbrance

Certificate dated 03.02.2014 issued by office of SDM, Sikar.

AND WHEREAS the Non Encumbrance Certificate (NEC) dates back to year 2014

ahd appellant ought to have submitted a latest copy of the NEC. Appeal Committeel..

~.ecided to remand back the case to NRC for giving the appellant another chance to

~.~bmit latest NEC which shall be ,subjected to due verification. Also as the applicant has...-'

....•~~.

x;applied for 4 year Integrated programme of B.A. B.Ed.! B.Sc. B.Ed. due care shall ~~etaken to ensure. that the applicant institution fulfils condition laid down in para 1.1. of

Appendix 13 'of the Norms and Standards of the NCTE Regulations, 2014.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, document,SI'

available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing:!

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC for giviri~

appellant another opportunity to submit latest Non Encumbrance Certificate and evidenceII

of fulfilling requirement of para 1.1. of Appendix 13 of the Norms and Standards pertaining

to 4 year Integrate9 programme i.e. B.A. B.Ed.! B.Sc. B.Ed.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of VinayakP.G. Degree College, Shivsinghpura, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar - 332001, Rajasthapto the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

(Sa jay Awasthl)Member Secretary

1. The Secretary, Vinayak P.G. Degree College, Shivsinghpura, NawalgarhRoad, Sikar - 332001, Rajasthan

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II:L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan:'

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofRajasthan, Jaipur. ' I

'.

:.1

.', .

S~', •.:.~~"",l ~.•t:'""l:NeTE

F.NO.89-423/E-5502/2017Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan,Wing II, 1, BahadurshahZafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

ORDERDate: \ ~\ \Dl \'1-

"

WHEREAS the appeal of Sardar Patel Teacher Training College, Losal,

Dantaramgarh, Rajasthan dated 24.05.2017 is against the Order No.

NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP201615187IB.AB.Ed./B.Sc.B.Ed. - 4 Year Integrated/RJ/2017-

18/2 dated 11/04/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for,-

conducting B.A. B.Ed./B.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds that "i) Society bye-laws not

submitted. ii) Submitted affiliation order is not readable. iii) The institution has not• # •• ~.

~.ubmitted the certified registered land documents issued by the Registering Authority or

civil authority concerned. iv) The institution has not submitted the Land Use Certificate

issued by the Competent Authority to use the land for educational purpose. v) The

Institution has not submitted the Non-Encumbrance Certificate issued by the Competent

Authority indicating that the land is free from all encumbrances. Hence, the Committee

decided that the application is rejected and recognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15

(-3)(b)of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution."~~:,.'\

AND WHEREAS Sh. Vinod Kumar Lamba, L.D.C, Sardar Patel Teacher Training

College, Losal, Dantaramgarh, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution

<:in25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that,.."NRC, NCTE issued a Show Cause Notice in which certain deficiencies were mentioned.

That this institution has submitted reply of SCN through E-mail on 28.03.2017. along withI

all required documents and the same has been despatched to NRC, NCTE office. That

tHis institution has again submitted the copy of reply letter along with required documents

to NRC, NCTE on 18.04.2017. That NRC, NCTE has rejected the application of this

ihstitution vide letter No. NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201615187/BA.B.Ed./B.Sc.B.Ed.-4Years

Integrated/RJ/2017-2018/2 dated 11.04.2017. That this institution has already submitted

~bciety registration certificate and bye laws with hard copy of application. Copy of

registration certificate and bye "laws are again submitted. That affiliation order for U.G.

'....':.~

and P.G. courses for session 2015-16 has already been subm,tted along with reply of

SCN to NRC, NCTE. Now affiliation order for 2015-16 and 2016-17 is annexed. That'i'

certificate copy of registration land documents has already submitted along wit~1

application. Now certified copy of Registered Land Documents are annexed. That th&&,

Land Use Certificate for educational purpose has been submitted along with reply letter;~

That the copy of Non-Encumbrance certificate has been submitted along with reply letter.

Now the Non-Encumbrance certificate is annexed. It is prayed that the rejection order,.j't!:tissued by NRC, NCTE be set aside."

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that none of three hard copies of

application submitted by applicant contains copy of land documents. The Registratidr)

Certificate of the society are found to be enclosed with the application. Appeal Committe:~,

further noticed from the application form that appellant institution is already recognise'~.,

for conducting 4 year Integrated B.A. B.Ed.! B.Sc. B.Ed. programme with an intake of 200

seats since 17.05.2016 and the present application is for a proposed additional intake cif

50 seats. %

AND WHEREAS the appellant in the reply to the decision of NRC taken in its 265~.~

Meeting to issue a Show Cause Notice, has submitted replies dated 28.03.2017 ar),q..,"!;:

18.04.2017. The second reply dated 18.04.2017 which was of course after the issue f2t.1,..",

impugned order 11.04.2017 contains copies of certified land document, Land US~

Certificate, Non Encumbrance Certificate and approved building plan.

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that affiliating University ha~

issued NOC dated 17.05.2016 for 4 year Integrated Course B.A. B.Ed. /B.Sc. B.Ed. only

to the existing Colleges as a matter of policy adopted by the state government. NRG>

Jaipur should have examined the case in view of the policy of the state and also keeping~

in view the fact that 4 units (200 seats) of the BA B.Ed.!B.Sc B.Ed programme hav;~:

already been recognised for the appellant institution. ,"..:;';'"

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee finally decided to remand back the case to

NRC for revisiting the case in light of the facts that NOC for the programme was issued:

by affiliating body as per policy of the State Government of Rajasthan and the appellant

"--

'institution is already recognised for conducting 4 units(200 seats) of the programme since. " .17.5.2016.


available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC for: revisiting

the case in light of the facts that NOC for the programme was issued by affiliating body

as per policy of the State Government of Rajasthan and the appellant institution is already

rf9cognised for conducting 4 units (200 seats) of the programme since 17.5.2016.

NOW THEREFORE; the Council hereby remands back the case of SardarPatel Teacher Training College, Losal Dhod Road, Losal, Dantaramgarh - 332025,Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

L'

~,:.:~"

.~!,::.

1

2.

R 3.

4.

,to:

,t:..

;10'


The Secretary, Sardar Patel Teacher Training College, Losal Dhod Road,Losal, Dantaramgarh - 332025, RajasthanThe Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofRajasthan, Jaipur. •..

"

'.::'

S~".,~~'""," .••.ott •• "

NCTE



"

.." ~~,.. ORDERDate: ,~, \ t)\ 1'1-

WHEREAS the appeal of S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya, Yaduvansh Nagar, Talgram, Uttar

Pradesh dated 31.5.2017 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/UP-3219/266th (Part-4)

Meeting/2017/171215 dated 13/04/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, withdrawing

recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds that "letter from the District Magistrate,

Kannauj dated 28.09.2016 reveals that the CLU No. 578 dated 02.06.2005 submitted by the

institution is fake. The Committee, therefore, decided to withdraw the recognition of the institution

(or B.Ed. course under Section -17 of the NCTE Act, 1993 for the next academic session."

."., .AND WHEREAS Sh. Ajay Pal Singh, Chairman, S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya, Yaduvansh

~agar, Talgram, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In:.~

the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that "The Letter no 578 dated

02.06.2005 stated to be CLU is not a CLU and it has never been claimed to be. We had applied"S'eeking recognition of B.Ed. Course to the NRC NCTE Jaipur on 24.10.2008 The application

was rejected on the following grounds (i) Resolution of Panchayat regarding approving of

building plan not submitted (ii) CLU not submitted Consequently, we had approached to thef",fAppeal Committee vide Appeal dated 18.08.2009 at that point of time. The appeal committee

was shown the CLU issued by UP Sanchalak Chakbandi Kannauj on 15.05.2009. There after

~he appeal committee justifying the validity of the CLU dated 15.05.2009 remanded the case to ."NRC vide order dated 08.10.2009. In the appeal order the CLU was categorically discussed and

accepted. A copy of the same is again enclosed which is a verifiable fact. The Letter No, 578

dated 02.06.2005 was got issued by an employee working with us through his relative (who was,",,..."working) in ADM Office at that point of time. When we realized that the employee has cheated

us in the form of taking money and arranging fraud document we have sacked him. Infect the

~etter no 578 dated 02.06.2005 was not meant for B.Ed course at all, but due to my sickness

the same was attached with file submitted to the NRC NCTE Jaipur which consequently resultedVi:into rejection of our application and could be reconsidered only after the issuance of CLU datedt, "~'5.05.2009 submitted to the Appeal Committee. It is important to mention here that after"remanding our case to NRC an inspection was carried out and at that time also our file was

r~jected due to certain deficiencies ncluding the one on CLU. We had appealed at that point of

:..i:'

:r'1(,.,

.d ~'.,,(

time also at the second time. The Appeal Committee again having observed the CLU is genuin~1

document, remanded to the NRC-NCTE Jaipur and thereafter due consideration of the said CLU~• I • .~ .

recognition was granted. Therefore, the reason/ ground of withdrawal of recognition is neither-c.

based on fact nor justified as the CLU is not the document stated in the Complaint letter nor

recognition was granted on the basis of the so-called CLU dated 02.06.2005. The above •.(,

explanation may please be considered and recognition be restored which is the demand of the>

justice."

AND WHEREAS Clause 7(3) of the NCTE Regulations, 2014 reads as follows: w"Furnishing any false information or concealment of facts in the application which m~¥

have a bearing on the decision making process or the decision pertaining to grant of recognitio~:

shall result in refusal of recognition of the institution beside other legal action against it~

management".

dAND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that impugned order of withdrawal dated

13.4.2017 was issued after giving the appellant due opportunity to submit a written representation

on the grounds on which it was proposed to withdraw recognition. Appellant institution submitted

its reply dated 20.3,2017. Appeal Committee further noted that whereas appellant has admitted

submitting to NRC a letter no. 578 dated 2.6.2005 purported to have been issued by the office 'of{:~

D.M. Kannauj as a change of land use certificate, the appellant has also stated that the letter was~.,~

obtained by an ex-employee of the institution through one of his relatives. The letter dated

2.6.2005 was admitted to be a forged document but it was not reckoned to be a valid document

for grant of recognition as the appellant had subsequently submitted another CLU date.?

15.5.2009 issued by Dy. Director, Chakbandi, Kannauj. Appeal Committee noted that the

appellant did not derive any benefit on account of a bogus CLU dated 2.6.2005 and has admitted.V

its mistake.

\i1AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that recognition for B.Ed. programme

was granted to appellant institution vide its order dated 18.2.2011 and the above order also makes

a mention in para 2 and 6 thereof that appellant institution has not submitted the change of land

use certificate initially. The CLU dated 20.6.2005 which was subsequently alleged to be bogus.and was also accepted by the appellant to be bogus was submitted by appellant institutio'ri

alongwith application dated 12.11.2008 by the appellant seeking recognition. Had this CLU dated

2.6.2005 been accepted by the NRC, recognition would not have been refused on this ground by

an order of NRC dated 25.7.2009. Appeal Committee further noted that after the case was

remanded vide NCTE order dated 8.10.2009, inspection of the institution was conducted orr

~~ 1.

2.

3.,"!l;.

(Yo .• 4.

..

,, I

9.2.2010 and copies of documents enclosed with the inspection report include the CLU dated

15.5.2009 which is found to be valid document relied on for the purpose of grant of recognition .•

AND WHEREAS there is no doubt that there was a misconduct on part of the appellant

institution, but it is still felt that the disputed document was not made use of for grant of recognition

and appellant has apologised for the lapse on its part. The institution was recognised for

conducting B.Ed. programme in February, 2011 and the penalty to withdraw recognition by issue

of impugned refusal order 13.4.2017 is not proportionate to the admitted misconduct moreso

when the alleged document was not 'made use of for granting recognition.Gv

"j; AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee, therefore, decided to reverse the impugned

withdrawal order dated 13.4.2017.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the Memoranda of Appeal, affidavit, documents on

record and oral arguments advanced during the hearing, Appeal Committee concluded to reverse<-

the impugned refusal order dated 13.4.2017.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby reverse the case of S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya,Yaduvansh Nagar, Talgram, Talgram Road, Talgram - 209731, Uttar Prades 0 the NRC,NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

I

"('


The Manager, S.G.R. Mahavidyalaya, Yaduvansh Nagar, Talgram, Talgram Road,Talgram - 209731, Uttar PradeshThe Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II, L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar Pradesh,Lucknow.

'"ii" I

~~'~~l....,NeTt:

F.NO.89-425/E-5509/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Shawan, Wing II, 1, Sahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

ORDER

WHEREAS the appeal of Smt. Kasturi Dwivedi Adarsh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya,

Jalaun, U.P. dated 22.05.2017 is against the Order No.

!'JCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201615415/Bachelor of Elementary Education [B.EI.Ed.]/UP/2017-

18/2 dated 28/03/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition forl:,~~nducting B.EI.Ed. course on the grounds that 'The applicant institution has not, .submitted the reply of the SCN within the stipulated time. Hence, the Committee decided

'1, I

that the application is rejected and recognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of

the NCTE Act, 2003. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution."~<

AND WHEREAS Dr. S.B. Dwivedi, Principal, Smt. Kasturi Dwivedi Adarsh

Sihiksha Mahavidyalaya, Jalaun, U.P. presented the case of the appellant institution on

25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that Show"C:ause Notice was not received by post. Of late we came to know that NRC is now

sorresponding online and by that time it was already late to have submitted reply to SCN

facts are now explained in the appeal."

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that impugned refusal order dated

28.03.2017 is some what contradictory so far it says that reply to SCN dated 28.03.2017

'&.asconsidered and then it says that applicant institution has not submitted the reply of

t~:eSCN within the stipulated time.,~.co:AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that SCN dated 30.01.2017 was on

..;

three grounds namely:

i) Copy of recognition order of B.Ed. course not submitted.

ii) Copy of affiliation letter for B.A., B..Sc., B.Com not submitted.

iii) Name of the course not mentioned on building plan.

(~:. f

,.

AND WHEREAS Appellant submitted copies of all three documents at the time dfappeal hearing onI25.0B.2017. Appeal Committee is of the view that approval of building

plan i~ a o~e tiri,e event unless there is some additional construction added to it:

Wherever an eXiJting institution seeks recognition for an additional course, it is more

logical if the instit~tion is asked to establish adequacy of built up area and earmarking ~f1 ~ t-t

built up area for the proposed course rather than asking it to get the name of programmeI R

on the already approved building plan. .;

. IAND WHEREAS Appeal Committee decided to remand back the case to NRC for

I

revisiting the matter after the appellant institute submits to it copies of requiredI

documents. Appellant is required to submit to NRC copies of recognition order for B.Ed.,

affiliation letter fO~B.A. B.Sc., B.Com and approval building plan within 15 days of th~. i :j)

Issue of appeal orders.

I;il',:.::..

AND WHEfEAS after perusal of the Memoranda of Appeal, affidavit, documen~s

on record and orallarguments advanced during the hearing, Appeal Committee concludedI

to remand back thb matter to NRC for revisiting the case. Appellant institution is requireq

to submit to NRC within 15 days of the issue of Appeal order copies of i) Recognition

order for B.Ed., ii) affiliation letter for B.A., B.Sc, B.Com and iii) Copy of approved building. ~plan.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Smt!Kasturi Dwivedi Adarsh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Paharpura, Jalaun Road, Jalaun":::'285123, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

i,.,


1. The Mana'ger, Smt. Kasturi Dwivedi Adarsh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya,Paharpura) Jalaun Road, Jalaun - 285123, Uttar Pradesh,.f

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation ~ Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.


4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of UttarPradesh, L~cknow. . i

, -

Date: \ b\ \()\ \ r.:rORDER

S~".l~ •• l .•.•1.""(NeTEF.NO.89-428/E-5708/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1~Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

1

"

WHEREAS the appeal of Bhagwant Singh Mahavidyalaya, Thakurdwara, Uttar Pradesh

dated 30,05.2017 is against the Minutes recorded against serial no, 162 of 267th Meeting of NRC

held from 5th to 7th April, 2017 deciding to refuse recognition for conducting B.EI.Ed. course on

the grounds that "The applicant institution has not submitted the reply of the SCN issued by the.NRC on 02.03.2017 within the stipulated time. Hence, the Committee decided that the applicationf

is rejected and recognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs,

if any, be returned to the institution."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Balra'm Singh, President, Bhagwant Singh Mahavidyalaya,I

Thakurdwara, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In

the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that "The above statement of NRC

is not correct as the reply to the Show Cause Notice was submitted to NRC vide our letter datediG .10th March 2017 copy attached through Courier. For the perusal of Appellate Authority, the(oJparawise reply to the points of Show Cause Notice are narrated below ours institution is a'S 'recognised institution running B.Ed. since 2004. The copy of recognition order No. 5104 dated-\.

05th August 2004 issued by NRC, Jaipur is attached. The copy of permanent affiliation issued

by the MJP Rohilkahnd University is attached. The certified copy of registered land documents

was submitted to NRC, however, the same is also attached with the appeal for perusal ofI

Appellate Authority. The building plan duly mentioning the proposed c.0urse was submitted,

however, the same is submitted before the Appellate Authority.

Certified copy of land documents were not submitted.,I

ICopies of reCOgnitio~ order for B.Ed. and affiliation order for B.Sc. course not

submitted.I

i)I'

ii)..'

~'.,."

g'..-r~:'

(~.t

tf-

~I. AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that appellant institution submitted online

a'pplication dated 31.05.2016 seeking recognition for one unit of B.EI.Ed. programme. Appeal.~~~bmmittee noted that a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 02.03.2017 was issued to appellant

on following grounds:

fr.".r,.

iii) Latest Non Encumbrance Certificate for Khasra No. 297, 299 & 300 not

submitted.

iv) Name of proposed course is not mentioned in the Building Plan.

. ~AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that to SCN was required to be submittea:.:

~twithin 21 days. The decision to refuse recognition was taken by NRC in its meeting held from

5th to 7th April, 20170n the ground that reply to SCN was not received. Committee noted further

that appellant during the course of appeal presentation submitted the reply to SCN was sent tor.,,'~,.,NRC vide its letter dated 11.03.2016 (By Courier). The track report and courier receipt were

also found submitted by the appellant. However, the above reply and enclosed documents are

not found available on the regulatory file. J~":J,

r~AND WHEREAS Appeal. Committee noted from the aforesaid reply that appellant h~~

, ..enclosed copies of required documents which more or less meet the requirement except thN

instead original certified copy of land document, zerox of certified copy of land document was

enclosed. Appeal Committee decided to remand back the case to NRC for considering the reply~dated 11.3.2017 a copy of which appellant should submit within 15 days of the issue of Appeal

Orders.,.~.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the Memoranda of Appeal, affidavit, documents ~.ryrecords and oral arguments advanced during the hearing, Appeal Committee concluded foremand back the case to NRC for consideration of the reply dated 11.3.2017 a copy of whi<;;Q

should be sent by the appellant to NRC within 15 days of the issue of appeal orders. Pc

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Bhagwant SinghMahavidyalaya, 2167.95, Thakurdwara Seohara Road, Thakurdwara - 244601, UttarPradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above. .~

( anjay Awasthi)Member Secretary

.• ,'1

1. The Manager, Bhagwant Singh Mahavidyalaya, 2167.95, Thakurdwara Seoha~~lRoad, Thakurdwara - 244601, Uttar Pradesh Ii


3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II, L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan. ,,;

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Rajasthan,Jaipur.

..••.• t,:0. •••••

:~.\

~s~• ,.,M"1!"ll"t....,'t .•• ~t .•'t

HeTS

F.No.89-429/E:-5714/2017Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan,Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

ORDER

WHEREAS the appeal of Bhagwan Jambheshwar Mahavidyalaya, Dhorimana,

Rajasthan dated 19.05.2017 is against the Order No. NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP

201616181/B.Ed.lRJ/2017-18/2 dated 19.04.2017 of the Northern Regional Committee,

refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds that "The applicant

institution has not submitted the reply of the SCN issued by the NRC on 02.03.2017 within

the stipulated time. Hence, the Committee decided that the application is rejected and

~ecognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any,


AND WHEREAS Sh. Kishan Lal, President,Bhagwan Jambheshwar

Mahavidyalaya, Dhorimana, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on

25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that

l~r.equireddocuments are now submitted with the Memoranda of Appeal".j ~~~:l\ .

c~ND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that appellant institution was issued a Showf"

;-.CauseNotice (SCN) dated 02.03.2017 for non submission of

i) Bye laws of society

ii) Affiliation order for B.A.

;~iii) Certified copy of land documents

iv) Non Encumbrance Certificate

)(.) Approved building plan with details of infrastructure.

~~'.'i Written representation in. reply to SCN dated 02.03.2017 was required to be

$6bmitted within 21 days from the date of receipt of SCN dated 02.03.2017. Appeal

dommittee noted that NRC in its 267th Meeting held on 05.04.2017 decided to refuse

recognition on ground of non receipt of reply to SCN.

,I!

I j

AND WHEREAS appellant during the course of appeal presentation submitted thab

copies of r~qUir+ documents were submitted with the Appeal Memoranda as sUfficien~

time was not gi,en to appellant institution to submit a reply to SCN. Original of 'an~~i

documents were also presented before Appeal Committee for perusal. Appeal

Committee howlver, noted that certified copy of land documents were not submitted

, alongwith APpeJI Memoranda. ,Y

AND WHElEAS Appeal Committee having noted that appellant institution i,s

already conducti1g degree level course in the institution, decided to remand back th~

case to NRC for further processing of the case. The appellant institution is required t~submit a comPlet6 and comprehensive reply of Show cause notice enclosing therewit'~

copy of all reqUirJd documents including original certified copy of the land documents.,:~

, 'IAND WHEREAS after perusal of the Memoranda of Appeal, affidavit, documents 01]

records and oral1rguments advanced during the hearing, Appeal Committee conclude~

to remand back rhe case to NRC for further processing of the case, The appellant

institution is requ1ired to submit a complete and comprehensive reply of Show caus~.,

notice enclosing therewith copy of all required documents including original certified copj1%of the land documents. ,..~

I " ~:NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Bhagwan

Jambheshwar M~havidyalaya, Dhorimana - 344704, Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, fornecessary action ~s indicated above. '

(Sanjay Awa thi)Member Secretary.

1. The Principal, Bhagwan Jambheshwar Mahavidyalaya, Dhorimana - 344704;iRajasthan I :::'

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Schoo,!,Education 81 Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. , ',;1

I

3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II, L1CBuilding, B~awani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The Secret~ry, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Rajasthan; ,Jaipur. ' ,

~~<'.I •••••t~ ••,. •..•.t""'I!

NCTEF.No.89-430/E-5781/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION


ORDERDate: 1b11 ())11-

WHEREAS the appeal of Indian Institute of Education, Naul, Shyampur, West Bengal

dated 25.05.2017 is against the Order No. ER/7-208.8.12/ERCAPP3235/(D.ELEd.)/2016/44868

dated 22/03/2016 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting

D.ELEd. course on the grounds that "(i) The land documents (Registered land deed) is in the

name of S.K. Golam Ehiya i.e. in the name of individual which is not acceptable as per NCTE

Regulation 2014. In view the above, the committee decided as under: The committee is of the

o'pinion that application bearing code No. ERCAPP3237 of the institution regarding recognition

for B.Ed. is refused under section 14(3)(b) of NCTE Act, 1993."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Rafik Ali Khan, Representative and Sh. S.K. Golam Ehiya,

Secretary, Indian Institute of Education, Naul, Shyampur, West Bengal presented the case of.-'the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was

submitted that 'The applicant Trust, submitted its online application for grant of recognition for

the academic session 2016-17 on 30/05/2015 for D.ELEd. programme (ERCAPP3235) with an

annual intake for 50 (one basic unit) and for B.Ed. programme (ERCAPP3237) with annual intake.j~of 100 (two basic units) as a composite institute in the name of "Indian Institute of Education"f!" ,-under "Ankur Educational and Welfare Trust". Relevant documents and an application fee of

Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rs. 1, 50,000/- each programme) by local courier. The application trust obtained

NOC from West Bengal Board of Primary Education and the University of Calcutta in the name

of the Institution" besides, all other relevant documents including building plan in favour of the

institution/trust. The applicant trust, in its reply dated 11/02/2016 against show cause notice

v.ide proceedings of 202nd Meeting held on 18th_23rd January 2016 by ERC, NCTE,';j .

Bhubaneswar, submitted in its written submission alongwith relevant documents with a prayero~of consideration for both the applications, which was unfortunately not considered by ERC,,,-'-,

NCTE. The applicant trust, at the time of submitting online application was in possession of

3723.08 sq. mts. (92.734 decimal) of Land and 3553.75 sq. mts. of Built-up area in the name of

the institute "Indian Institute of Education" which satisfied the norms for composite institution as

per NCTE Regulation, 2014. The applicant Trust, before its online application, having all(" .

significant documents (Land Position Certificate, Land Mutation Certificate, Non-Encumbrance

• I

;.

j,

Certificate, etc. issued by concerned BL & LRO, Govt. of West Bengal) in the name of the "Indian','

Institute .of Ed.ucation" to establish its land position/ownership in favour of the institution. Henc~.'

such a point can't be ground of rejection. The applicant Trust found an order passed by Hon'bl~, '.!

Appeal Committee vide F.No. 89-168/2016 Appeal/7th Meeting-2016, dated 04/07/2016 filed by

one Dr. Grahams Homes, Kalimpong, Darjeeling, West Bengal, wherein the case was remanded

back to ERC, NCTE with undermentioned observation/facts/ground: n ••. Committee further noted

the submission made by the appellant stating that land was allotted to the founder member of

the society during early years of last century. The appellant institution has furnished copy of land.

title certificate issued by paying fee to District Sub-Registrar, Darjeeling, Certificates issued by"J •.... .Dist. Land & Land Reforms officer and Non-Encumbrance Certificate issued by Block Land anq"

Land Reforms Officer, Kalimpong also support the fact that land is recorded in the name o(Kalimpong also support the fact that land is recorded in the name of Dr. Graham's Homes Board

of Management. Appeal Committee is of the opinion that registered land documents does not

necessarily mean copy of sale deed of land documents registered in the office of Registrar/Sub-

Registrar. Legal ownership and possession of land can also be through land allotment or some

other certificates issued by competent authority .... n, ERC, NCTE without consideration of the

facts and documents including affidavit/undertaking rejected both the applications of D.EI.Ed.,',

(ERCAPP3235) Programme vide order No. ER/7:"

208.8. 12/ERCAPP3235/(D.EI.Ed.)/2016/44868, dated 22/03/2016 and B.Ed. (ERCAPP3237}V

Programme vide order No; ER/7-208.8.11/ERCAPP3237/(B.Ed.)/2016/44862, dated 22/03/2016"

applied for the academic session 2016-17 with liberty to file an appeal to the Applicant Institution

as per NCTE Act, 1993. ERC, NCTE, after passing of 9 month 10 days (approx.) from the receipt

of the hard copies of the online application (12/06/2015) to issuance of rejection order/(s),

(22/03/2016) ultimately refused both the applications for D.EI.Ed. (ERCAPP3235) Programme'

and B.Ed. (ERCAPP3237) Programme. The applicant trust submitted the facts that NCTE.

issued public notice dated 9th March 2016 inviting online application for the academic session,;,~'oI.i .(.

2017-18, however it was also noted on the NCTE Public Notice that "In case of Tamil Nadu anq'lI

West Bengal the decision about restriction on the TE courses shall be taken on receipt of the

input of the respective State Govt." it is to be observed that the Government of West Bengal did

not provide any recommendation to NCTE regarding ban for the academic session 2017-18.

Hence, the applicant Trust/Institute has lost the opportunity to file a fresh application for the

academic session 2017-18. The applicant Trust also submitted the facts that NCTE issued'

public notice deciding not to invite/accept applications for the academic session 2018-19 for

grant of teacher training institutions/programmes, published in the NCTE website http://ncte-'.1.,india.org. Thus, the Applicant Trust/Institute has lost all the opportunity to file a fresh application''!'

for the academic session 2018-19, The applicant trust affirms that "Indian Institute of Education';'V

i)

.,' ii)

..-:iv)

has diligently portrayed its true position of the land and building on the aforementioned address.

Hence the applicant trust submitted ,its prayer for condoning the delay and allows/reconsiders

the Appeal Application. The applicant trust found proceedings from internet (NCTE website),

where the Hon'ble Appeal Committee considered many cases and reverted back the matter to

the ERC, NCTE for reconsideration, analogous to the Applicant Trust/Institution. The Applicant

Jrust/I nstitute had no other alternative but to file an Appeal under Section 18 of the NCTE Act

1993, with clean hand before the Hon'ble Appeal Committee to save the future of the institute.

The applicant trust/institute thus seeks for reconsideration of the case with the provision for

remanding back to the ERC, NCTE for further processing of the applications."

AND WHEREAS Appellant requested for condoning the delay in preferring appeal as

secretary of the institution was seriously ill during the period. Appeal Committee decided to

condone the delay and take up the appeal on its merits.

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that rejection order is only on the ground that• i ~

\and documents are in the name of SK Golam Ehiya Le. in the name of individual which is not

~cceptable.' Appeal Committee noted that the name of Sh. Golam Ehiya is mentioned as

~.ecretary of the Indian Institute of Education in all the sale deed documents including the Memo

of consideration. To support the possession and ownership of land by the 'Indian Institute of

Education', the applicant had furnished following documents:

Non Encumbrance Certificate dated 13.11.2013 issued by Block Land and Land

Reforms Officer, Howrah.

Change of Land Use Certificate dated 29.10.2013 issued by office of Sub Divisional

Land and Land Reforms Officer, Uluberia, Howrah.

Land Possession Certificate dated 28.05.2015 issued by Block Land and Land

Reforms Officer, Shymapur-II, Howrah .

Building Plan in the name of India Institute of Education approved on 22.05.2015 by

Nirman Sahayak, Nakole Gram Panchayat.

Building Completion Certificate dated 19.01.2016 issued by Asstt. Enginner, Howrah Zila

Parishad .

...AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee after going through the details of case does not have

any iota of doubt about the ownership of land which rests with the 'Indian Institute of Education'.

p}ppeal Committee, therefore, decided to set aside the impugned refusal order dated 22.3.2016

and remand back the case to ERC, Bhubaneshwar for further processing of the case.

II

...

,)..'


available on recorbs and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, th~,I

Committee conclud~d that the appeal deserves to be remanded to ERC for further processing ofI

the case. II

INOW THE~EFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Indian Institute of

Education, Naul, ~hyampur - 711312, West Bengal to the ERC, NCTE, for necessary actio~as indicated above. .r-

~..-G

1. The Secretary, Indian Institute of Education, Naul, Shyampur - 711312, West Bengal2. The Secre~ary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Departm'ent of Schoql

Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli,

Bhubaneshwar - 751 012.4. The Secret~ry, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West Bengal;

Kolkata. I ;.,:I ~j

,'"

,,

,. ,

..~,.~

t".}.'

..:t-i

...,",. ' R. "r-"":f~..,' ,.•:.tr~

NeTt:


Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - .110002

ORDERDate: , bl '~111-

WHEREAS the appeal of Sorabh College of Physical Teacher Training, Kheda,

Hindauncity, Rajasthan. dated 31.05.2017 is against the Order No. NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP

.201616453/B.P.Ed.lRJ/2017-2018/2 dated 11.02.2017 of the Northern Regional

Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.P.Ed. course on the grounds that "The

institution has not submitted any proof 1 evidence to prove that it is a composite institution

as per clause 2(b) of NCTE Regulations, 2014. A major portion of the land in the

possession of the applicant institution was not in the name of the society 1 institution at

the time of the submission of the application for the proposed course.? Non-Encumbrance

Certificate is not related to the concerned land. Hence, the Committee decided that the

~~plication is rejected and recognition 1permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE

Act, 1993. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Surendra Sharma and Sh. Vishnu Sharma, Representatives,

Sorabh College of Physical Teacher Training, Kheda, Hindauncity, Rajasthan presented

the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal

presentation it was submitted that Appellant had applied for grant of recognition of

B.P.Ed. course vide its application dated 29.06.2016 while making necessary

a~rangements with regard to physical infrastructure and 'facilities. In the reply of Show

ekuse Notice, appellant had submitted relevant documents which would clearly show

that the observations made by NRC in its 262nd Meeting had been removed by appellant.

So far as observation with regard to proof / evidence of "composite institution" under

Clause 2(b) of NCTE Regulations, 2014 is concerned, it is stated that appellant is already

running M.Ed., B.Ed. and STC courses and thus it is running multiple Teacher Training

courses and it satisfies the eligibility of being a composite institution. Appellant had.-c~'

submitted Non-Encumbrance Certificate pertaining to land of institution which is/was,,: .ffisued by the competent authority. Thus, a wholly non-existent ground has been taken

'ij~. .ft. ;.~

;~..

,",

i)

ii)

iii)

iv)

v)

vi)

by NRC while rejecting the application. A wholly invalid and unwarranted ground ofi '

refusal with rega'rd to land in possession of institution being in name of society /

institu~i~n h~s beln tak~n. It i~ stated that the aforesaid ground was never mentioned in

the show cause notice and nor was any opportunity. of hearing given to appellant

previously. Thus, fhe d~cision taken by NRC in its 263rd Meeting with regard to aforesaid, ..

ground clearly violates principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was give!"!.I . :h,

to appellant on this very aspect. Therefore, same is liable to be quashed and set aside ....I "(Because appellant had submitted a representation dated 04.05.2017 to NRC for

considering case objectively but same has not been considered by NRC. A copy of.

representation dated 04.05.2017 is enclosed. Appellant prays indulgence of appellate.

body to ProducJ rele~ant documents and pronouncements during the course of.

arguments. Becluse various other institutions were exactly placed like appellant had'

been granted recbgnition. Because other appropriate ground and submissions would

be made by apbellant after seeking prior permission from the learned appellat~.;~:.I

.N--.r.'

authority." I"AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that appellant institution in its online.

application dated! 29.06.2016 applied for seeking recognition for conducting B.P.Ed.

programme. As ~er d~tails filed in the application form, the appellant .institution was

proposed to be locat~d at Survey No. 951, 953/2 village Kheda, District Karavli,

Rajasthan. The land area was mentioned as 32500 Sq. Meters.

AND WHEtEAS Appeal Committee noted that NRC in its 262" Meeting (Part 9):;/

dated 24.01.~01.1 decided t~ issue a Show Cause NotiC~ (.SC~) to appellant institution,'r-

for non submISSion of follOWIng documents and a few defiCienCIes such as :I .

Non submission of :I

Renew~d society Registration Certificate.I

Evidenbe to prove that it is a composite Inst.

Certifieb copy of Land documentsI

Name 0f courses being run on khasra no. 951 and 953/2I .

Non EMcumbrance Certificate .,Approved building plan with all infrastructural details.

Further in the minutes of NRC Meeting it was pointed out that land at Khasra no.

- 951 measured 4700 Sq. Meters' and at Khasra No..953/2, 2700 Sq. Meters total land

. was not adequate for proposed course and also did not tally with the land area declared

. in the affidavit and application form.

'"AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that appellant institution had

~ubmitted a reply dated 20.02.2017 on the points of deficiencies mentioned in the 262nd

Meeting of NRC. Appellant enclosed copies of certified land documents with this reply

as follows:

i)

ii)

iii)

iv)

v)

Khasra No. 947Khasra No. 950Khasra No. 951Khasra No. 954Khasra No. 953/2

Khasra No. 978/2Khasra No. 979

Khasra No. 940

Khasra No. 942

Khasra No. 939

Area 2.01 Hec.Registered on 08.12.2005

0.62 Hec.0.21 Hec.Registered on 03.08.2016.

0.37 HecRegistered on 27.09.2016

0.29 Hec.Registered on 18.11.2009

0.33 Hec. Registered on 27.09.2016

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that appellant institution also

submitted copy of a building plan approved by Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat at Kheda,

Jamalpur, Hindon City, Rajasthan. This building plan mentions only two khasra number

i.e. 951 and 953/2, Karavli Road, Kheda. Online application also has only these Khasra,"

numbers on record. Appeal Committee is of the view that land located at other khasra

number which were not mentioned in the application and also the land purchased by the

appellant society after submission of the online application have no relevance. Clause.",

8(4) of the NCTE Regulations says that 'No institution shall be granted recognition unless

the institutions or society sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land on

the date of application.' Obiviously the ownership of land is required to be checked with

'i 1:;~" .

reference to the identification of land given in the application form. Para 6.2 of Norms anti'

standards (Appendix 7) for B.P.Ed. Degree programme require thus an institution must

have 5-8 acres of land and Physical education' course are not to be run with other teacher

education courses.

!,t'.

AND WHEREAS considering that appellant institution did not have adequate lan~,.on Khasra no. 951 and 953/2, as on the date of application, Appeal Committee decided'

to confirm the impugned refusal order dated 11.02.2017 issued by NRC Jaipur.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the Memoranda of Appeal affidavit, documents on

record and oral arguments advanced during the hearing, Appeal Committee concluded,'.

to confirm the impugned order dated 11.02.2017. ;':1'.~

~~J'

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against

0/\' /~njay Awast if

Member Secretary

1. The Secretary, Sorabh College of Physical Teacher Training, Kheda, KarauljiRoad, Hindauncity - 322234, Rajasthan .1 ';

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. tt

3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,~L1C Building, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthari~

4. The Secretary., Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofRajasthan, Jaipur.

_. ~•.:

I" "~~

. '.1'-t~~\ ~,..rp<!I Hen:


Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002I

ORDERDate: 1b 1 \ b )1-1--

~WHEREAS the appeal of iSorabh College of Teacher Training, Gudasi Road,

Sawaimadhopur, SawaimadhopLir, Rajasthan dated 31.05.2017 is against the Order No.I

NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-12422/257.th (Part-3) Meeting/2016/158462 dated 21/09/2016 ofI

the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.EI.Ed. course on

the grounds that "The institution was given show cause notice vide letter dt. 03.12.2015

with direction to submit the reply within 30 days. The institution did not submit any reply

of show cause notice within stipulated time."

,AND WHEREAS Sh. Surendra Sharma and Sh. Vishnu Sharma, Representatives,

Sorabh College of Teacher Training, Gudasi Road, Sawaimadhopur, Sawaimadhopur,

Rajasthan presented the case ofthe appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal

and during personal presentation it was submitted that the order of rejection has been

passed behind the back of appellant without giving any opportunity of hearing. The order

0f refusal dated 21.09.2016 as also the very show cause notice dated 3.12.2015 is bad

a'ild without jurisdiction for the reason that the affiliating body for D.EI.Ed. Course, Le.

Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner had already conveyed its policy to respondent

NRC vide letter dated 21.08.2016. Thus, there was no occasion for NRC to reject

~~pplication of petitioner on the ground that NOC of affiliating body had not been

submitted. It is stated that while passing the refusal order dated 21.09.2016, NRC has

overlooked the communication dated 21.08.2016 and has thus passed an order in a veryi.'casual and unwarranted way and that too on a non-existent reason. It is stated that the

Mlow cause notice had never been received by the appellant and therefore it could not

f5~replied. The respondent-NRC must be put to strict proof regarding dispatch of show,."cause notice to appellant. The Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court as well as the appellate

I

body in similar facts and circumstances have given relief to the institutions once such-""-order had been passed by appel,late body on 18.04.2017 in an ~ppeal which had been

II

.-"...•._.t,_

"

, '

'"

"d

I

filed by Kamakaha Education College Sagwara, Dungerpur, Rajasthan. The humble,

appellant 'shall refer and rely upon relevant pronouncements during the course of• .• ~ I

• . I

arguments/heanng. "

I ' ','AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that appeal made by appellant'

institution is delaybd by more than 6 months and no reason was given by the appellan~':!I

for this delay. Sim!ilarily, the appellant had not replied to the Show Cause Notice (SCN)I ,).

dated 03.12.2015Iand in the appeal Memoranda it is stated that SCN was not received\tI

by appellant institution. Appeal Committee does not find on the regulatory file anyI

communication from the appellant institution ever since it submitted online application

daled 30.05.201 5 ilililhe dale of appea I, seeking any slalus enq uiry of lhe case. ..,'

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that appellant institution'.,I ,~<

submitted online application on 30.05.2015 and applied for NOC from the affiliating body, '

30.06.2015. There was no NOC from affiliating body till the issue of letter dated,

15.04.2016 in whi'ch the State Government (Deptt. Of Primary Education) conveyed aM

list of 12 Districts ~here NOC was deemed to have been given to new private institution

for starting D.EI.E~. programme. Swai Madhopur is one of the twelve districts where theI

Department of Pri!mary Education, Govt. of Rajasthan has no objection to the openingl k"

of new D.EI.Ed. in,stitutes. :'),1 ...fl

I ~AND WHEREAS in the above circumstance, Appeal Committee decided to

remand back thel case to NRC for revisiting the matter in light of the letter dated

15.4.2016 of Stat~ Government. NRC should, however, keep in view that the appelianPi'I

was a standalone institution as on the date of application which are not permissibleI

under clause 3(a):of the NCTE Regulations, 2014.,I

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documentsI '

available on recofds and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing;,'I ",

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC for revisiting'I

the matter in ligHt of the letter dated 15.4.2016 of State Government. NRC should,,, .

however, keep in view that the appellant was a standalone institution as on the date of

application which are not permissible under clause 3(a) of the NCTE Regulations, 2014.

, \

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of SorabhCollege of Teacher Training, Gudasi Road, Sawaimadhopur, Sourabh Campus,Sawaimadhopur - 322001, Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action asindicated above.

(Sanjay Awasthi).Member Secretary

1. The Secretary, Sorabh College of Teacher Training, Gudasi Road,Sawaimadhopur, Sourabh Campus, Sawaimadhopur - 322001, Rajasthan


-=. 3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofRajasthan, Jaipur.

,-

r

"

~~'_~,.n.,NC;TEF.No.89-433/E-5857/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Shawan, Wing II, 1, SahadurshahZafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

ORDERDate: 1b \ I ()11 1-

WHEREAS the appeal of Sorabh College of Teacher Training, Gudasi Road,

Sawaimadhopur, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan dated 31.05.2017 is against the Order No.

NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-15112/257th (Part-3) Meeting/2016/160316 dated 14/10/2016 of

the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.EI.Ed. course on

the grounds that "The institution was given show cause notice vide letter dt. 03.12.2015

with direction to submit the reply within 30 days. The institution did not submit any reply

of show cause notice within stipulated time."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Surendra Sharma and Sh. Vishnu Sharma, Representatives,

S'orabh College of Teacher Training, Gudasi Road, Sawaimadhopur, Sawaimadhopur,

Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on 25/08/2017. In the appeal

and during personal presentation it was submitted that the order of rejection has been

passed behind the back of appellant without giving any opportunity of hearing. The order

of refusal dated 21.09.2016 as also the very show cause notice dated 3.12.2015 is bad

ahd without jurisdiction for the reason that the affiliating body for D.EI.Ed. Course, i.e.

Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner had already conveyed its policy to respondent

NRC vide letter dated 21.08.2016. Thus, there was no occasion for NRC to reject

~'pplication of petitioner on the ground that NOC of affiliating body had not been

submitted. It is stated that while passing the refusal order dated 21.09.2016, NRC has

overlooked the communication dated 21.08.2016 and has thus passed an order in a very...casual and unwarranted way and that too on a non-existent reason. It is stated that the

show cause notice had never been received by the appellant and therefore it could not

fJe replied. The respondent-NRC must be put to strict proof regarding dispatch of show

cause notice to appellant. The Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court as well as the appellate

8bdy in similar facts and circumstances have given relief to the institutions once such~~order had been passed by appellate body on 18.04.2017 in an appeal which had been

,.

..•\.

•J'

filed by Kamakaha Education College Sagwara, Dungerpur, Rajasthan. The humble

appellant 'shall r.efer and rely upon relevant pronouncements during the course of

arguments/hearing. "I

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that appeal made by appellant'I .

institution is delayed by more than 6 months and no reason was given by the appellantI

for this delay. Similarily, the appellant had not replied to the Show Cause Notice (SCN)~

dated 03.12.2015 ,and in the appeal Memoranda it is stated that SCN was not received'j ,

by appellant institution. Appeal Committee does not find on the regulatory file any

communication from the appellant institution ever since it submitted online applicationII

dated 30.05.2015 till the date of appeal, seeking any status enquiry of the case.I

IAND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that appellant institution ..

submitted online alpPlication on 30.05.2015 and applied for NOC from the affiliating bodyI

30.06.2015. Ther~ was no NOC from affiliating body till the issue of letter datedI

15.04.2016 in which the State Government (Deptt. Of Primary Education) conveyed a}

list of 12 Districts where NOC was deemed to have been given to new private institutio'1I

for starting D.EI.Ed. programme. Swai Madhopur is one of the twelve districts where the.I

Department of Primary Education, Govt. of Rajasthan has no objection to the opening

of new D.EI.Ed. in1stitutes.II "

AND WHEREAS in the above circumstance, Appeal Committee decided to

remand back the case to NRC for revisiting the matter in light of the letter datedI .

15.4.2016 of State Government. NRC should, however, keep in view that the appellant')

was a standalon~ institution as on the date of application which are not permissible'I

under clause 3(a)iof the NCTE Regulations, 2014.

IAND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documents

Iavailable on reco~ds and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,

the Committee corcluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC for revisitingI

the matter in light of the letter dated 15.4.2016 of State Government. NRC should,I

however, keep in Iview that the appellant was a standalone institution as on the date of

application which [are not permissible under clause 3(a) of the NCTE Regulations, 2014.IIiI1

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Sorabh'College of Teacher Training, Kharli, NH11, Dausa - 303303, Rajasthan to the NRC,NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

anJay Awasthi)Member Secretary

1.

2.

(', 3...'1\1.. 4.

The Secretary, Sorabh Col.lege of Teacher Training, Kharli, NH11, Dausa - 303303,RajasthanThe Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II, L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Rajasthan,Jaipur.

R• '.I~""" ,~;rr~'!NeTE



ORDERDate: \ b\l t) 1 1"1-

WHEREAS the appeal of Bhavnath Chaudhary College of Education, Maganpur,

Durgapur (Diwanganj) P.O. - Koora, Pindrajora, Chas, Jharkhand dated 30.05.2017 is

against the Order No. ERC/239.8.3/(part-1) 1.0. No. 8176/D.EI.Ed.l2017/52750 dated

02.05.2017 of the Eastern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting

D.EI.Ed. course on the grounds that "Show Cause Notice was issued on 03.04.2017 on

the following grounds: NOC for the applied D.EI.Ed. course issued on 09.08.2016 i.e.

after the stipulated date of 15th, July, 2016 which is not accepted. In response, the

institution submitted reply vide letter dated 28.03.2017 with copy of No. Objection

Certificate issued by Director, Directorate of Primary Education, Jharkhand, Ranchi on

69.08.2016 i.e. after 15th July, 2016 as per Regulation, 2014 which is not accepted by the

Committee. In view the above, the Committee decided as under: The Committee is of

the opinion that application bearing No. ERCAPP201646386 of the institution regarding

recognition of D.EI.Ed. Programme is hereby refused under section 14(3)(b) of NCTE Act .

1993."

AND WHEREAS Sh. A. Kumar Chaudhary, Director, Bhavnath Chaudhary College

of Education, Maganpur, Durgapur (Diwanganj) P.O. - Koora, Pindrajora, Chas,r.jharkhand presented the case of the appellant institution on 26/08/2017. In the appeal

&lhd during personal presentation it was submitted that "they had applied to Director(:

Primary Education Department of Human Resource Development of Jharkhand

Government to issue no objection certificate for opening D.EI.Ed. course vide their letter

dated 18.05.2016. It was mentioned that the last date of online application to NCTE is

31.05.2016. Though they had applied for NOC to the Jharkhand Government well in

advance but the NOC was issued by them vide letter 09.08.2016. So, this is not fault

from their side. The delay in issuance of NOC is not attributable to them which wasi'

b'eyond their control. It has come to their knowledge that institutions having submitted

,..

I'.,.

.1,'I

,'j

::{

against.

..r~.• ~. "fo

..:'-'

their NOC even after them have got the opportunity for Visiting Team. Therefore, it isI

their submission that they should also get a chance on the same ground. As per NCTE'

Regulations 2014!, it has been mentioned that those organizations who conduct B.Ed

course can condubt D.EI.Ed course which is the mandatory requirement. Their Institution

has the required infrastructure to conduct the two composite courses.". I

IAND WHEREAS the Committee noted that according to the provisions of Clause i

5(3) of the NCTE Regulations, 2014 a No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued by the'"I

concerned affiliating body shall be submitted along with the copy of the on-line

application. Sincei the appellant institution obtained the NOC only on 9.8.2016 i.e. after.'

the last date of 15.7.2016 for submission of hard copies of the on-line application, the,

Committee concluded that the ERC was justified in refusing recognition and therefore,II .

the appealdeserv'ed to be rejected and the order of the ERC confirmed.I,

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, the.I 'tl/l

documents available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during\!I

the hearing, the Committee concluded that the ERC was justified in refusing recognitionI

and therefore, the 'appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the ERC is confirmed. ;.j,•,

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealedI .: ~


1. The Diredtor, Bhavnath Chaudhary College of Education, Maganpur,Durgapur (Diwanganj) P.O. - Koora, P.S. - Pindrajora, NH 32 (Near ChasCollege Chas), Chas - 827013, Jharkhand


3. Regional D,.irector,Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli,Bhubanesh'war - 751 012.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofJharkhand.:

,.',

- .\ ..

iR• '•.l-f,"<~l ~4t:~

HeTt:

F.No.89-435/E:-5853/2017Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan, Wing II, ~, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

ORDERDate:\~ 11 \)1 1'"t-

WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Krishan Co-Education College, Harsoli, Mundawar

~oad, Kotkasim, Rajasthan dated 28.04.2017 is against the Order No.

NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201615182/B.A. B.Ed.! B.Sc. B.Ed.-4 year Integrated/RJ/2017-2018/2;

dated 17.04.2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting

B~A.B.Ed.!B.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds that "The applicant institution has not submitted

the reply of the SCN issued by the NRC on 21.01.2017 till date. Hence, the Committee

decided that the application is rejected and recognition / permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b)

of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution."

.\ AND WHEREAS Sh. Rajendra Prasad Yadav, Chairman, Shri Krishan Co-Education

~ollege, Harsoli, Mundawar Road, Kotkasim, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant

i,l},stitutionon 26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation the appellant

~ubmitted that he had sent a letter dt. 17.04.2017 to the NRC enclosing some documents.

A copy of this letter has been enclosed to the appeal.

AND WHEREAS the Committee noted that the NRC issued a show cause notice on;)

21.01.2017 pointing out the various documents which the appellant did not submit. While

there is no reply to this show cause notice as such, the file contains a letter dt. 17.04.2017

s~nt by the appellant enclosing some documents. The appellant, in this letter made af,.lreference to the NRC's communication dt. 26.03.2017, which is not available in the file.!!i::

~:r AND WHEREAS the Committee also noted from the file of the NRC that the

gppellant sent a communication to the NRC on a Rs. 500/- stamp paper and attested by a

Notary, which was received in the NRC on 21.04.2017. In this communication, the appellant

s:ubmitted that their institution never received any show cause notice from the NRC and

while they visited the NRC office, they were verbally directed to deposit CLU, certified copy

of land, blue print of map, building completion certificate, not for profit certificate and non-t;{encumbrance certificate. The appellant submitted that in consonance of the verbalrc

.~-'.

SJ.

r'.)

directions of the officers of the NRC, they submitted the required documents with their letter

dt. 17.04.2017. Thk appellant further submitted that without considering their letter dt.~~. . '. '

17.04.2017 their file was rejected, which is unjustified.I! ~I

AND WHER,EAS the Committee noted that the documents sent by the appellant with:;'! ~~

their letter dt. 17.4.2017 do not cover all the documents/information found wanting and';:.,.....

mentioned in the show cause notice dt. 21.1.2017, which the appellant denied having(;~I b

received. In these circumstances, the Committee concluded that the matter deserved to beI

remanded to the NRC with a direction to re-issue their show cause notice dt. 21.1.2017I

which appears to nave been sent bye-mail, to the appellant by registered/speed post, tOj-I •

enable him to send a reply in respect of all the points mentioned therein, and take furtherI

action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. ;."I ~

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documentsI ~~

available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the'I .T''''

Committee concluc;ledthat the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with a direction t,o'

re-issue their show cause notice dt. 21.1.2017 which appears to have been sent bye-mail toI

the appellant by registered/speed post, to enable him to send a reply in respect of all the: I.

points mentioned therein, and take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. -,I,

(S njay Awasth" ,Member Secretary

,I

i1. The Secretary, Shri Krishan Co-Education College, Harsoli, Mundawar Road;

Kotkasim + 301403, Rajast~an2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School

Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.3. Regional D'irector, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II, L1C

Building, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan. !;~;4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of.

Rajasthan, :Jaipur. ".

IINOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Shri Krishan

Co-Education Coilege, Harsoli, Mundawar Road, Kotkasim - 301403, Rajasthan to theNRC, NCTE, for n'ecessary action as indicated above. !.!

(',

('

S~~:"""'{~~l ,.•.ltt"~

iNCTe



Date: \~l \\), 1'=TORDER

WHEREAS the appeal of Aravali College of Teachers Training, Eklingpura, Girva,I

Rajasthan dated 29.05.2017 is against the decision of the Northern Regional Committee,

c'ontained in the minutes of their 267th meeting held from 5th to 7th April, 2017, to refuse

recognition for conducting B.A B.Ed./B.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds that "The

il)stitution has not submitted the approved building plan signed by the competent Govt.

Authority indicating the name of the course, name of the institution, khasra No./Plot No.

total land area, total built-up area and the measurements of the Multi-purpose Hall as well

as the other infrastructure facilities such as class rooms etc. The institution has not

submitted the Non-Encumbrance Certificate issued by the Competent Authority indicating

that the land is free from all encumbrances. Hence, the Committee decided that the,

application is rejected and recognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE

Act, 1993. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution." The file of the NRC does not

eontain a copy of the refusal order.

AND WHEREAS Sh. Mahesh, Director, Aravali College of Teachers Training,

Eklingpura, Girva, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on

26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that the

Institute has already submitted the approved Building plan signed by the Govt. Engineer

thdicating the name of the course B.A. B.Ed. / B.Sc. B.Ed. Khasra no. 2880, 2905,

3450/2905, totallan'd area 1.6 acres 6747 sqm. total build-up area 3184.34 s.q.m. and

frldicating the measurement of the multi-purpose hall as well as the other infrastructure

facilities such as class rooms etc. The institute has already submitted the non-

Encumbrance Certificate Issued by the Sub. Registrar, Tehsil Girva, Udaipur and

i'ridicating that the land is free form all encumbrances. The appellant with the appeal,

enclosed a copy of the Non-Encumbrance certificate dt. 07.04.2017 issued by the Sub-

Registrar, Girva, Udaipur and a blue print of the building plan approved by the Executivej

.j-

.r

'.\ '

'.f.~")..'

Engineer, PWD Di~ision, Kherwara, indicating the Khasra numbers, name of the courses,.I f';.

land area, built-up area etc.

AND WHEREAS the Committee, noting that the appellant has submitted the'-, .

documents mentioned in the decision of the NRC, concluded that the matter deserved.]i

to be remanded to the NRC with a direction to consider the documents to be submitted.:'I 'j,.:'"

by the appellant tc;>them and take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014:::,The appellant is directed to forward the documents submitted in appeal to the NRC within

I

15 days of receipt 'of the orders on the appeal.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit,

documents available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during';

. the hearing, the C<;>mmitteeconcluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC,'.I ~t

with a direction to consider the documents to be submitted by the appellant to them and';,

take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is directed to~~.'

forward the documents submitted in appeal to the NRC within 15 days of receipt of theF

'

orders on the appeal.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of AravaliCollege of Teachers Training, Eklingpura, Jhamer Kotdra Road, Girva - 313003,Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

"( anjay AwasthifMember Secretary

I1. The Manager, Aravali College of Teachers Training, Eklingpura, Jhamer Kotdr~.,

Road, GiNa - 313003, Rajasthan2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School

Education ~ Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.3. The Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,

L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan. r',.4. The Secr$tary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government Qt

Rajasthan, Jaipur. :;;",:,c"'

.-..:

'S~.~~ .•.•, ~:.n""",

Hen;:



.'

ORDERDate: ,~\ \Ol 1'1-

WHEREAS the appeal of Nandkishore Singh' Patel Memorial Education Training:;;

Institute, Tikari, Betul, Madhya Pradesh dated 29.05.2017 is against the Order No.

~RC/NCTE/APP1951/272nd/D.EI.Ed/{M.P.}/2017/184150 dated 24/04/2017 of the Western

Regional Committee, granting recognition for conducting D.EI.Ed. course with an annual

i~take of 50 students (one basic unit) from the academic session 2017-18. The appellant

wants recognition for two units .• J

AND WHEREAS Sh. Abhay Kr. Chaubey, Lecturer, Nandkishore Singh Patel

~emorial Education Training Institute, Tikari, Betul, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of

the appellant institution on 26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was

submitted that "the Appellant had already applied for two Units vide Letter Dated 23 02 2017"

and thereafter vide Letter Dated 15032017. The Appellant had also applied to the Member

{:?~cretary,Delhi Vide Letter Dated 03042017. Ignoring the same the NCTE vide order dated

?fl 04 2017 has given recognition to one unit only which was not actually prayed for. Since

c;lcademic session 2017-18 has ended, therefore, recognition for two units for academic

session 2018-19 should be awarded. It should be noted that all facilities of infrastructural and

i~l)structionalfacilities, Library, accommodation, financial, resources, laboratory, etc. for two

units i.e for 100 students is already made out. The V.T. has already recommended for 100seats."

,~

, AND WHEREAS the Committee noted that the appellant, in the affidavit enclosed to~1~.

their on-line application dated 10.01.2011 for grant of recognition for D.EI.Ed. course, has~;(r~quested an intake of 50 seats. The Visiting Team that inspected the appellant institution on

1:a.02.2017, while observing that some of the facilities are not available but the management

is ready to fulfil after getting permission letter from the NCTE, suggested that NCTE should

6~bnsiderthe proposal positively. The Visiting Team did not make any recommendation about

the intake. Thereafter, the WRC issued the Letter of Intent on 27.02.2017 for an annual intake

of 50 students (one basic unit). On receipt of a reply dt. 02.03.2017 to the Letter of Intent from

..,t'r'

, , ethe appellant, the WRC, in their 272nd meeting held on April 6-8, 2017, noting that the

institution has submitted a list of one HOD and seven faculty members, decided to grant

recognition for one unit of D.EI.Ed. In these circumstances, the Committee concluded that the. ~

WRC was justified in granting recognition for one unit of D.EI.Ed. with an intake of 50 student~

and therefore, the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the WRC confirmed. ~""~;-'

AND WHEREAS the Committee noted that the appellant, with their reply to the Letter

of Intent enclosed minutes of the Section Committee for the teaching staff, in which the

Principal of Institute of Advanced Study in Education, Bhopal was a representative of th~

SCERT. The Committee also noted that the same representative has signed the statement

of staff profile. There is no formal approval of the concerned affiliating body to the faculty,recommended by the Selection Committee. In these circumstances, the Committee\:concluded that the WRC should immediately obtain from the appellant, the approval of ttie

'.:~selected faculty from the concerned affiliating body, which is a requirement as per th~

provisions of Clause 7(13) of the NCTE Regulations, 2014. ~.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, document~

available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, th'e

Committee concluded that the WRC was justified in granting recognition for one unit ofj

D.EI.Ed. with an intake of 50 students and therefore, the appeal deserved to be rejected and,t.;the order of the WRC confirmed. -,I~),

,:..,

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed against.

, '


1. The Manager, Nandkishore Singh Patel Memorial Education Training Institute;Betul, NH-69, Itarsi Road, Tikari, Betul - 460001, Madhya Pradesh :':

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Scho~.1Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. ' ~..:

3. The Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, NCTE Manas Bhawan',:Shayamala Hills, Bhopal- 462002 ~.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of MadhyaPradesh, Bhopal.

,'1

R• '~l-ft;f~ .••), .•"'l" •.•.NeTt


Hans Bhawan, Wing 11,1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

Date: '\b\ \D\' 1-ORDER

WHEREAS the appeal of Amman 1.1. College, Dholakhera, Udaipurwati,

Rajasthan dated 01.06.2017 is against the Order No. NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-12836/265th

Meeting/2017/170312 dated 04/04/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing

recognition for conducting B.A. B.Ed.lB.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds that "the

institution was given show cause notice dated 15/09/2016. Reply of the institution dated

25/10/2016 was considered in the meeting and following deficiencies are found:- As per

CLU total converted land is only 2500 sq. mts. which is not sufficient for the existing B.Ed.

(2 units) and proposed B.A. B.Ed. / B.Sc. B.Ed. course .. Total land area and name of

proposed course is not mentioned in the building plan. Khasra No. in NEC is not matching'"with Khasra No. in application as well as land documents."

,t AND WHEREAS Sh. Vidhya Dhar Singh, President, Amman 1.1. College,

Dholakhera, Udaipurwati, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on

~6/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation and in a letter dt.

2'5.08.2017, it was submitted that there are two conversion orders-' order no 25/2007

khasara no. 986/604 Rakba for 2500 sq. Mtr. and order no 25/2007 khasara no. 986/604

Rakba 2500 sq. Mtr. Total converted Land Area is 5000 sq. Mtr. Copy submitted. In the

hew building plan, course name has been added and total Land area is shown. In the

application form the khasara no. is 986/604 and now in NEC also the khasara no. is

9"'86/604. The appellant submitted copies of the conversion order, blue print of the

bDilding plan and NEe.~f

.J•• '

,:: AND WHEREAS the Committee, noting the conversion orders, blue print of

building plan and the NEC submitted by the appellant, concluded that the matter

deserved to be remanded to the NRC with a direction to take further action as per the

NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is directed to forward the documents submitted

in the appeal to the NRC within 15 days of receipt of orders on the appeal.,.d

(S njay AwasthiMember Secretary;

i!IIII

AND WHER'EAS the Committee noted that while the on-line application is dated.I (>

30.05.2015, 'the appellant submitted on 15.03.2016 the No Objection Certificate (NOC)/ •.. I, ~-;:-issued by Pandit Deendayal Upadhaya Shekawati University, Sikar on 14.03.2016;;~

According to the iprovisions of clause 5(3) of the NCTE Regulations, 2014, a N~~(I - ~

Objection Certificate (NOC) issued by the concerned affiliating body shall be submitted" .

along with the pri~t out of the on-line application. The Council, for the academic yearj :

2016-17, extended, the last date of submission of hard copies of the applications, alongr

with the NOC upto: 15.07.2015. NRC, while taking further action as suggested in para 3

above, should takk into account the fact that the appellant did not submit the NOe in IiI ~.

time as per the NqTE Regulations. FI '~..{I ~.\(

AND WHE~EAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, document~L

available on recoras and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,'

the Committee cdncluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with aI .~,direction to take fjurther action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is'

directed to forward the documents submitted in the appeal to the NRC within 15 days ofI

receipt of orders ~n the appeal. While taking further action suggested in para 3 above','

the NRC should dke into account the observations contained in para 4 above. (;'I '1

I ~NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Amman T.T•.

College, Dholakh~ra, S.H.-37, Udaipurwati - 333307, Rajasthan to th NRC, NCTE, fdr'I

necessary action :as indicated above., I

II

IiIiI ~

1. The Manag;er, Amman T.T. College, Dholakhera, S.H.-37, Udaipurwati - 333307:;:Rajasthan' . ',:,

2. The Secret~ry, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchodlEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. ,

3. The Region:al Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The Secre~ary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofRajasthan, ~aipur..

;'

R• '.,I-t~~) ,"jn-.~

HCTE


Hans Bhawan,Wing II, 1"Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

ORDERDate: \b\ \ \)1 t ~

WHEREAS the appeal of J.B. Shah Girls (P.G.) College, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan dated

01.07.2017 is against the Order No. NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201615406/B.A. B.Ed.l B.Sc.•B.Ed.-4 year integrated/RJ/2017-2018/2 dated 18.04.20170f the Northern Regional

Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.A. B.Ed.lB.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds

that "the institution has not submitted the certified registered land documents issued by the

Registering Authority or civil authority concerned. The institution has not submitted the

~pproved building plan signed by the Competent Govt. Authority indicating the name of the

course, name of the institution, Khasra No.lPlot No., total land area, total built-up area and

the measurements of the Multi-purpose hall as well as the other infrastructural facilities such

a,sclass rooms etc. The institution has not submitted the Non-Encumbrance Certificate issued

by the Competent Authority indicating that the land is free from all encumbrances. Hence, the

Committee decided that the application is rejected and recognition/permission is refused u/s

1i4/15(3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993. FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution."

~( AND WHEREAS Sh. Mukesh Krishnia, lecturer and Sh. Anil Mishra, Staff, J.B. Shah

Girls (P.G.) College, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on

26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that "this college

i.~running U.G. & P.G. courses since 1982. This institution has applied for grant of recognition

. for B.A.B.Ed.lB.Sc. B.Ed. course online on 30.05.2016 and the hard copy of application was

submitted to NRC, NCTE on 10.06.2016. The NRC, NCTE has issued a show cause notice

i.pdicatingcertain deficiencies on 03.03.2017. This institution has submitted a reply of SCN

along with all required documents to NRC, NCTE on 17.03.2017. The NRC, NCTE hasI',

~~jectedthe application of this institution without considering the documents submitted by this

institution. 36700 sqm. of land of khasra No. 4381/1543 and 4382/1544 situated in village

Jhunjhunu is in the name of "Shri Madan lal Shah Education Society, Jhunjhunu." For proof

~.fownership of land in the name of Society, following documents are annexed:- (i) Copy of

~easeof land for 99 years issued by Distt. Collector, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) and duly registered in

the office of Sub-Registrar, Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (ii) Copy of allotment letter and letter for

'';'

~','

,),

extension of perioq of Lease deed issued by Distt. Collector, Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (iii) Copy of

Zamabandi (Khat?~ni) issued by Revenue Deptt., Govt. of Rajasthan. (iv) Copy of approved

building map from: Nagar Parishad, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) and (v) copy of Non-Encumbranci~n;Certificate issued b'yTehsildar, Jhunjhunu. Thus NRC, NCTE has rejected the application ofthis institute for grant of recognition of B.A. B.Ed./B.Sc. B.Ed. course on arbitrary, ana

unjustified basis. Tiherefore, it is prayed that the rejection order issued by NRC, NCTE be set

aside and directions be issued to NRC, NCTE for further process of application of this institut,e,, ,~'

for grant of recoQnition of B.A. B.Ed./B.Sc. B.Ed. course. In the course of person~1,

presentation, the $ppellant submitted a copy of the land documents certified by the Dy.

Registrar, Jhunjhunu and a NEC dt. 2.5.2017 issued by the Tahsildar, Jhunjhunu.;,c,. ~

AND WHEREAS the Committee, noting that the appellant has submitted the releva~t, ~

documents mentiored in the order dt. 18.4.2017, concluded that the matter deserved to b~I ~:~

remanded to the N!RCwith a direction to consider the documents to be submitted to them by

the appellant and take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is

directed to forwarq all the documents submitted in the appeal to the NRC within 15 days of

receipt of the orders on the appeal.

,AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documents

available on recor~s and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, th~I ~

Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with a direction {d'I

consider the docur,nents to be submitted to them by the appellant and take further action as

per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is directed to forward all the documents

submitted in the appeal to the NRC within 15 days of receipt of the orders on the appeal. "','NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of J.B. Shah Girls

(P.G.) College, Jhunjhunu - 333001, Rajasthan to the NRC, NCTE, r necessary actionas indicated above.

Sanjay AwasthiMember Secretary

1. The Secre~ary, J.B. Shah Girls (P.G.) College, Jhunjhunu - 333001, Rajasthan :'2. The Secre'ary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School

Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.3. The Regio:nal Director, Western Regional Committee, NCTE Manas Bhawan;'

Shayamala' Hills, Bhopal- 4620024. The Secret~ry, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Madhya

Pradesh, Bhopal.II j

II ',.

j •.

,',S~, .:-t~"'" ."""'t

HCTE


Hans Shawan, Wing II, 1, Sahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002,,II ORDER

Date: "b\ \ 0111-

WHEREAS the appeal of Tirhut College of Physical Education, Jhaphan,

Bochahan, Bihar dated' 02.06.2017 is against the Order No.

ERC/233.7.1/APP2362/D.P.Ed./2017/52283 dated 13/04/2017 of the Eastern Regional

~ommittee, refusing recognition for conducting D.P.Ed. course on the grounds that "(a)

Show Cause Notice was issued on 01.03.2016 on the following grounds: (i) As per VT

Report, built-up area is only 2150 sq~ mts. which is less than requirement for B.P.Ed. +

D.P.Ed. as per NCTE Regulations. (b) In reply to SCN, the institution submitted its reply

vide letter dated 02.12.2016 received in ERC, NCTE on 09/12/2016. The ERC considered

the reply of the institution and obserVed that the institution is still deficient on the following

grounds:- (i) As per VT Report, the total built-up area was only 2150 sq. mts. (ii) Now,

the institution submitted photocopy of building plan of existing hostel building (Block-C),.,mentioning total built-up area 1368.26 sq. mts. out of which Ground floor having 684.13

~. mts. built-up area which was constructed after the inspection and the same is not

~:ccepted by the Committee. (iii) As per NCTE Regulation 2014, there is no provision for

re-inspection of the institution. In view the above, the Committee decided as under: The

Committee is of the opinion that application bearing code No. ERCAPP2362 of the

~~stitution regarding permission of D.P.Ed. Programme is refused under section 15(3)(b)

of NCTE Act 1993."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Manish Kumar, Jt. Secretary, Tirhut College of Physical

E;ducation, Jhaphan, Bochahan, Bihar presented the case of the appellant institution onr'

2:()/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation and in a letter dt.

24.08.2017, it was submitted that liThe applicant institution is running B.P.Ed. course

with the permission of ERC. As required under NCTE Regulations, 2014, with a view to

rliake the institution composite" they applied for D.P.Ed. course. The building of the

institute comprising of Block A, Band C sanctioned by the competent authority provides

,\ri.,

for the total built ~p area of 4867.28 Sq. Mts. The competent authority, sanctioned the

building plan in the year 2013 i.e. much prior to submission of application to ERC. The. l ~.

Competent Authority, which is Sub Divisional Officer issued the Building Completion~l,!,?A

Certificate dated 11.02.2014 in respect of total built up area of the building i.e'. 52391.~~1" ,

I

Sq. Ft. which is equivalent to 4867.28 Sq. Mts. Thus, the applicant has the built-up area,1, ~.I

of 4867.28 Sq. MtiS.from 11.02.2014 itself. A copy of the sanctioned building plan andI '

building completion certificate are attached. It is evident from the sanctioned building ..•.

plan and building completion certificate, that the applicant has more than sufficient built~

up area much prior to even submission of application seeking recognition for D.P.Ed.I

course. Thus, the iERe was neither justified in issuing show cause notice nor justified in.,r

refusing recognitidm on the grounds mentioned in para 4 b of the refusal order datedR;

13.04.2017. Further, it is submitted that the applicant institution has all the necessary~

infrastructure for the sports i.e. 400 mts. standard track, football, hockey, volleyballN

Kabaddi, Kho Kho, Basketball, badminton, table tennis, ground and equipment etc.I .

Thus, the applicant institution has all the physical and academic infrastructure for running,,,,i '

DP Ed. course. Thus, the Applicant is entitled for recognition for running D.P.Ed. course

and the order dated 13.04.2017 of ERC deserves to be set aside."

AND WHE~EAS the Committee noted that the Visiting Team, who were als.qI

supplied with a copy of the building completion certificate dt. 11.02.2014, to which .~

reference has been made in the appeal, in their report, recorded that after physicC!,1;

measurement, the total built up area was 2150 sq. mts. (Block 'A'-1150 sq. mts + Block

'B'-1000 sq. mts). :The VT also suggested that the building plan and building completiolJ,!

certificate are required to be analysed by the ERC for taking necessary decision., .

AND WHEREAS the Committee also noted that the appellant, in response to the

decision taken by the ERC in the 206th meeting held on 26-27 February, 2016 to issue. .~

a show cause on the ground that the built up area of 2150 sq. mts reported by the VT is ~I

. ,.. .

inadequate for B.P.Ed. and D.P.Ed. course as per NCTE Regulations, sent a letter dt. .:;I ~tl

29.02.2016 to the ERC. In this letter, the appellant submitted that the College decided

to allocate ground floor with a built up area of 684.13 sq. mts of the proposed hostel of";'.1

two floors, as no admitted students turned up for accommodation in the hostel. The",

appellant also suqmitted in this letter that building construction on full covered area of

1050 Sq. mts is in progress and it is expected to be completed with proper furnishing

before 15th May, 2016. The app~lIant, in the appeal, is claiming that they have a total

built-up area of 4867.28 sq. mts from 11.02.2014 itself i.e. the date of issue of building

completion certificate.

AND WHEREAS the Committee, noted that there are apparent contradictions

between the submissions made in the appellant letter dt. 29.02.2016 and the appeal dt.

02.06.2017 and the VT reported availability of only 2150 Sq. mts on physical

measurement. In these circumstances, the Committee concluded that to get a clear and

authentic picture about the availability of built up area for the existing B.P.Ed. and the

proposed D.P.Ed. courses, the matter deserved to be remanded to the ERC with a

direction to get the institution re-inspected on payment of the prescribed fee by the

appellant, and take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014.

~." AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documents

~vailable on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to ERC with a

qirection to get the institution re-inspected on payment of the prescribed fee by the

appellant, and take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of TirhutCollege of Physical Education, Jhaphan, Jhaphan Road, Bochahan - 842314, Biharto the ERC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

",1.

2.

1'"3.

te.

~:.' 4.

The Secretary, Tirhut College of Physical Education, Jhaphan, JhaphanRoad, Bochahan - 842314, Bihar .The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli,Bhubaneshwar - 751 012.The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Bihar,Patna .

."

"f',<

Date: 't,\\0\ 1"1-ORDER

gHeTC


Hans Bhawan, Wing II, ~, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

~l j'

...~' \," WHEREAS The appeal of Tarapada Dey Educational Institution, Srirampur,

Nabadwip, W.B. dated, 30.05.2017 is against the Order No.

ERC/236.8.5/ERCAPP2840/B.Ed./2016/52266 dated 12/04/2017 of the Eastern

Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. course on the grounds

that "a. Show cause notice was issued on 23.12.2016 on the following grounds:- (i)

Inspection to the institution as well as letter to VT experts was issued on 09.04.2016. (ii)~j

Dr. U.N. Singh, VT expert vide letter dated 22.04.2016 reported that in spite of their.'.."'"sincere efforts to get the inspection conducted, the institution did not agree to get thes""

inspection on the pretext of ongoing Assembly Election in the State of West Bengal. (iii)

the Committee noted that at the time of issuance of Inspection letter, the institution was

not ready for conducting the inspection. (iv) As per NCTE Regulations 2014, inspection

of the institution is not conducted as per the consent of the institution. b. In response, the

institution vide reply dated 26.12.2016 (one the basis of proceedings uploaded in ERC

vyebsite) has requested for inspection of the institution, which is not accepted by the

90mmittee. In view the above, the Committee decided as under: The Committee is of

f-Keopinion that application bearing Code No. ERCAPP2840 of the institution regarding,"

recognition of B.Ed. Programme is refused under Section 14(3)(b) of NCTE Act 1993."J'.

AND WHEREAS Sh. Nirbhik Dey, Secretary, Tarapada Dey Educational

fnstitution, Srirampur, Nabadwip, W.B. presented the case of the appellant institution on

26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that "the

if1lstitution was ready to conduct inspection but at that time, the on-going Assembly

Elections in West Bengal were held during that period. The State Election Commission

Highly alerted the area where their college is situated as sensitive. The agitated people

~Iosed the road on their political issues. So, the VT members did not agree to inspect

their college. Therefore, they requested the ERC NCTE office to conduct inspection."

""

1:AND WHEREAS The Committee noted from the file that while an inspection has nbt

• I~'"

been conducted * all, there have been allegations against the institution by the Vf.,members nominated for the inspection and counter allegations by the appellant institutiQ~

against the VT me,mbers, However, to get a clear picture about the preparedness of the

appellant institution to conduct the proposed course, the Committee concluded that the

matter deserved to be remanded to the ERC with a direction to get the institutio~

inspected by a freshly constituted team on payment of the prescribed fee by the appellant,

and take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014, "~ •.•••' J

;a

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documents;

available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,.••• 1

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to ERC with ar

.direction to get the institution inspected by a freshly constituted team on payment of th~

prescribed fee bYIthe appellant and take further action as per the NCTE Regulations';

2014.

: ' j:NOW THE~EFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Tarapada

Dey Educational Institution, Srirampur, Nabadwip - 741316, West Bengal to the.ERC, NCTE, for ?ecessary action as indicated above. '" ~

( anjay AwasthiMember Secretary

1. The Secr~tary,Ta.rapada Dey Educational Institution, Srirampur, Nabadwip-741316, \l\(est Bengal.

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation '& Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. '.

3. Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli;:Bhubaneshwar - 751 012.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of WestBengal, Kolkata.

..{~iI) :J~f • '.I."';t~~' ";n'~I Hcn;:

F.No.89-448/E~6401/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan, Wing 11,1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, N~w Delhi - 110002

,'.

ORiDERDate: \ b' 1~ , 11-

WHEREAS the appeal of Tarapada Dey Educational Institution, Srirampur,

Nabadwip, W.B. dated 30.05.2017 is against the Order No. ERC/236.8.6 (Part-

1I)/ERCAPP2855/D.EI.Ed./2016/52121 dated 05/04/2017 of the Eastern Regional

Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.EI.Ed. course on the grounds that "a.

Show cause notice was issued on 23.12.2016 on the following grounds:- (i) Inspection

to the institution as well as letter to VT experts was issued on 09.04.2016. (ii) Dr. U.N.

Singh, VT expert vide letter dated 22.04.2016 reported that in spite of their sincere efforts.1'

!o get the inspection conducted, the institution did not agree to get the inspection on the

pretext of ongoing Assembly Election in the State of West Bengal. (iii) The Committee

noted that at the time of issuance of Inspection letter, the institution was not ready for

,?,onducting the inspection. (iv) As per NCTE Regulations 2014, inspection of the

institution is not conducted as per the consent of the institution. b. In response, the

institution vide reply dated 26.12.2016 (one the basis of proceedings uploaded in ERC

website) has requested for inspection of the institution, which is not accepted by the

0;ommittee. In view the above, the Committee decided as under: The Committee is of

the opinion that application bearing Code No. ERCAPP2855 of the institution regarding

recognition of D.EI.Ed. Programme is refused under section 14(3)(b) of NCTE Act 1993."

e: AND WHEREAS Sh. Nirbhik Dey, Secretary, Tarapada Dey Educational

Institution, Srirampur, Nabadwip, W.B. presented the case of the appellant institution on

26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that "the

il')stitution was ready to conduct inspection but at that time, the pretext on going,.~ssembly Election in West Bengal were held during that period. The State Election

Cbmmission highly alerted area where their college is situated as sensitive. The agitated

p:eople closed the road on their political issues. So, the VT members did not agree to

,--J'

.,~:"Y'.

inspect their college. T,herefore, they requested the ERC NCTE office to condudj~fi ~~{;~~~

inspecti.on."

AND WHE~EAS the Committee noted from the file that while an inspection has not

been conducted [at all, there have been allegations against the institution by the VIimembers nominated for the inspection and counter allegations by the appellant institution

against the VT mbmbers. However, to get a clear picture about the preparedness of th~

appellant instituti~n to conduct the proposed course, the Committee concluded that th~. l:J"

matter deserved to be remanded to the ERC with a direction to get the institution.~~

inspected by a freshly constituted team on payment of the prescribed fee by the appellanl;I .

and take further dction as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. 171

AND WHElEAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, documents,

available on reC+ds and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to ERC with a

direction to get th1einstitution inspected by a freshly constituted team on payment of th~

prescribed fee bJ, the appellant and take further action as per the NCTE RegUlation~~~

2014~. ~

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of TarapadaI

Dey Educational Institution, Srirampur, Nabadwip - 741316, West Bengal to theERC, NCTE, for hecessary action as indicated above. ? ~-

.\.J.

1. The Secre~ary,Tarapada Dey Educational Institution, Srirampur, Nabadwip'~741316, V\'IestBengal iii


I3. Regional qirector, Eastern Regional Committee, 15, Neelkanth Nagar, Nayapalli",

Bhubanes~war - 751 012. .4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of West

Bengal, K1lkata. ..l:.I .',

I ;~:.:..;f:i~~:..

,'"1

Date: 'b1\t> \ lq-

S~• ,.~~ ..•••, ";jfr~'t

'NCTE


Hans Bhawan,Wing 11,1,Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

ORDER

WHEREAS the appeal of Sunder TT College, Mahapura, Jaipur, Sanganer.\=

Rajasthan dated 06.06.2017 is against the Order No. NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP

201615170/B.A. B.Ed/B.Sc.B.Ed.-4 year integrated/RJ/2017-18/2 dated 27.04.2017 of

the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting B.A. B.Ed.lB.Sc.

B'.Ed. course on the grounds that "Reply of SCN issued by NRC to the institution has notJ.

been received within stipulated time. Hence, the Committee decided that the application

is rejected and recognition/permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of the NCTE Act, 1993.

FDRs, if any, be returned to the institution."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Ramphool Choudhary, Secretary, Sunder TT College,

Mahapura, Jaipur, Sanganer Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant institution on

2'6/08/2017. In the letter dt. 06.06.2017 and during personal presentation it was submitted

t~at they submitted their on-line application on 27.05.2016 and thereafter they did not

feceive any information.

AND WHEREAS the Committee noted that the file of the NRC does not contain

any show cause notice issued to the appellant institution. Further, the reply dated

27.4.2017 stated to have been considered before reusing recognition (as mentioned in

the order) is also not to be found in the file. In these circumstances, the Committee

ooncluded that the matter deserved to be remanded to the NRC with a direction to re-

(~~ue the show cause notice to the appellant institution and take further action as per the

!,!CTE Regulations, 2014.


~vailable on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with a

I,'1

direction to re-issue the show cause notice to the appellant institution and take furtherj~ ")

action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014.r' '

( anjay Awast ifMember Secretary

•I,I

1. The Secretary, Sunder T.T. College, Mahapura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur;Sanganer;- 302026, Rajasthan


3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1C Building, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajastha~:.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government at'Rajasthan,' Jaipur

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Sunder T.T.;College, Mahapu~a, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Sanganer - 302026, Rajasthan to the NRO.,. /NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above. ;./'~!

I,"

S~'.~~"~, • .lI"f',-,,:NCTe

F.No,89-450/E-6405/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1j Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002

0.'\"~' ORDER

Date: ,to) \ 01\1--

WHEREAS the appeal of' Ram Tej Bhagauti Prasad Mahavidyalaya, Village -

Dharsawan, Distt, - Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh dated 30.05.2017 is against the Order No.

NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-15526/266th Meeting (Part-3)/2017/170188dated 03/04/2017 of the

Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.EI.Ed. course on the

grounds that "The SCN was issued on 23rd November 2016 followed by a letter on 12.12.2016

regarding not matching of land/plot number in Sale Deed with other documents i.e. Khatauni;.,"

and LUC, submitted by the institution. The institution had not earmarked teacher education'..~programme area on the building plan. The institution has not submitted its response within

stipulated period on the above points so for. The reply dated 24.11.2016 submitted by the

institution does not respond to the above queries."

,\' AND WHEREAS Sh. Ram Sunder Pandey, .Founder, Ram Tej Bhagauti Prasad

Mahavidyalaya, Village - Dharsawan, Distt. - Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh presented the case of

the appellant institution on 26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was? "submitted that "the SCN was not received by the institution till today. Therefore, no reply SCN

~?s been sent. It is impossible to reply SCN dated 12.12.2016 by the so-called reply letter

~?ted 24.11.2016 mentioned in refusal order. The letter dated 24.11.2016 sent by the

ipstitution is related with the registration and bye-laws of the institution, which was sent during

checking of file and giving oral direction/order by the section officer at NRC office Jaipur. The

grounds mentioned in refusal order regarding not matching of land/plot number are due to

ehakbandi process in village Dharsawan. Gata No. 114 etc, of sale deed are old numbers

before Chakbandi and Gata No. 1859, 1861/1862/2 of Khatauni are new number after

Chakabandi process. The certificate of Chakbandi officer regarding this concern and the

~farmarked building plan is already attached in the file in process at NRC, Jaipur. Thesel .~

~~cuments are also included with the memorandum of appeal."

AND WHEREAS the Committee noted that the file of the NRC contains the minutes

of their 260th meeting held from 21st to 23rd November, 2016, wherein the decision to issue a

'",..•.•.

"

lor"

.ilshow cause notice was taken. A show cause notice was actually issued on 2.12.2016. As

'd;!mentioned by the appellant they sent a letter dt. 8.11.2017 (the correct date should be

, I' "

8.11.2(16) suo-moto with which papers relating to registration of their society and bye-laWs

were sent to the NRC and which was received on 24.11.2016. This letter is not a reply to any

show cause notice.

AND WHEREAS the Committee also noted that the appellant with their appeal

furnished replies and documents vis-a-vis the grounds of refusal. In these circumstances, the~~)

Committee concluded that the matter deserved to be remanded to the NRC with a direction,:0

to consider the replies to the grounds of refusal to be submitted to them by the appellant anc!,'r:

take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is directed to forward.:'::

all the documents submitted in the appeal to the NRC within 15 days of receipt of the orders

on the appeal.


available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the

Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with a direction to".~':t

consider the replies to the grounds of refusal to be submitted to them by the appellant aqdJ"t

take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is directed to forward

all the documents submitted in the appeal to the NRC within 15 days of receipt of the order~'

on the appeal....}

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Ram TejBhagauti Prasad Mahavidyalaya, Plot No. 1859, 1861, 186 Kha, Village - Dharsawan,Distt. - Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh - 271835 to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action asindicated above. ;i~~

, I,~jay Awasth")

Member SecretarY

1. The Manager, Ram Tej Bhagauti Prasad Mahavidyalaya, Plot No. 1859, 1861, 186Kha, Village - Dharsawan, Distt. - Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh - 271835 .,'


3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II, L1CBuilding, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Uttar.Pradesh, Lucknow. 1~

';'

i~t~' .

.<

~ ,

S~, .1ft{'"'"~' .~t''''l:

NeTE



ORDERDate: '61' t>1 Vl-

WHEREAS the appeal of R.K.J.K. Barasia P.G. College, Chirawa Road, Surajgarh,

Rajasthan dated 01.06.2017 is against the Order No.

NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201615346/B.A.B.Ed.lB.Sc.B.Ed. - 4 Year Integrated/RJ/2017-

18/2; dated 11/04/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for

conducting B.A. B.Ed.lB.Sc. B.Ed. course on the grounds that "SCN was given in 264th

Meeting (Part-3) and reply received on 16.03.2017. As per land documents submitted by

the institution, the land is on private lease basis which is not acceptable as per NCTE

Regulations, 2014. Hence, the Committee decided that the application is rejected and



AND WHEREAS Sh. N.L. Arrawatia, Joint Secretary, R.K.J.K. Barasia P.G.

College, Chirawa Road, Surajgarh, Rajasthan presented the case of the appellant

institution on 26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted

tnat "this college is running U.G. & P.G. courses since 1994. This institution has applied

fOr grant of recognition for B.A. B.Ed.lB.Sc. B.Ed. course online on 30.05.2016 and the

hard copy of application was submitted to NRC, NCTE on 03.06.2016. The NRC, NCTE

has issued a show cause notice indicating certain deficiencies on 24.02.2017. That this

i'ristitution has submitted reply of SCN along with all required documents to NRC, NCTE

on 16.03.2017. The reply of SCN submitted by this institution was updated on NCTE

Portal on 21.03.2017, in which it is stated that as per land document Land is on private

lease basis which is not accepted as per Regulations 2014. Copy of status report of their

gpplication is annexed. This institution has submitted additional reply of SCN to NRC,:'':NCTE on 03.04.2017 along with ownership certificate issued by Nagar Palika, Surajgarh.,Distt. - Jhunjhunu (Raj.). copy of reply letter is annexed. The NRC, NCTE has rejected

t~e application of this institution without considering the documents submitted by this;~

institution vide lett~r dated 11.04.2017. 29294.15 sqm. Land of khasra No. 835, 1383/83:?) ':.. '

and 836 situated in village Surajgarh is in the name of "Ganpatrai Ram Kishan Baras.ia• f • • ~ •• ' :.. .. ~

Charitable Trust, Mumbai" for proof of ownership of land in the, name of trust, followiri~I

documents are arlmexed:- Copy of lease deed for 99 years issued by Nagar Palika,

Surajgarh and d~ly registered 'in the office of sub-registrar, Surajgarh, Jhunjhunu,I

Rajasthan; Copy lof certificate issued by Nagar Palika, Surajgarh, Jhunjhunu (Rap)

regarding owners~ip of Land in name of trust; Copy of Zamabandi (Khatauni) issued byI,

Tehsildar, Surajgath, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) regarding ownership of Land in the name of Trust;

Copy of Registere:d Gift Deed in the name of Trust duly registered in the office of Sub"

Registrar, Surajga1rh, Jhunjhunu (Raj.); Thus NRC, NCTE has rejected the application ofI '

this institute for g:rant of recognition of B.A.B.Ed./B.Sc.B.Ed. course on arbitrary andJI '

unjustified basis. :Therefore, it is prayed that the rejection order issued by NRC, NCTE

be set aside and ~irections be issued to NRC, NCTE for further process of application of

this institute for grlant of recognition of B.A. B.Ed./B.Sc. B.Ed. course." In the course ofI

personal presenta~ion, the appellant submitted a copy of registered correction deed dt.

25.08.2017 for the! land according to which the deed is now in favour of the Trust througn

their secretary.

AND WHE~EAS the Committee, noting that the appellant has met the objection 6fi ' .

the NRC regardin~ the title of the land by executing a registered correction deed dt.,

25.8.2017, concluided that the matter deserved to be remanded to the NRC with a

direction to consider the correction deed to be submitted to them by the appellant ana

take further actio~ as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is directed to

forward a copy of the correction deed to the NRC within 15 days of receipt of the orders

on the appeal.,


available on recor~s and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing,

the Committee cdncluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with aI

direction to consid:er the correction deed to be submitted to them by the appellant and

take further actio~ as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014. The appellant is directed to

forward a copy of the correction deed to the NRC within 15 days of receipt of the ordersI

on the appeal. !,:

.,

,I

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of R.K.J.K.Barasia P.G. College, Surajgarh, Chirawa Road, Surajgarh - 333029, Rajasthan tothe NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

1. The Joint Secretary, R.K.J.K. Barasia P.G. College, Surajgarh, Chirawa Road,Surajgarh - 333029, Rajasthan



4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of UttarPradesh, Lucknow.

'S~".I....,~<"t' .000VO't•• C~



ORDER

WHEREAS the appeal of Ram Naval Singh Smarak Mahavidyalay, Bhikhampur,

Mohammadabad Gohana, Mau, Uttar Pradesh dated 25.05.2017 is against the Order No.

NRC/NCTE/NRCAPP-13833/260th Meeting/2016/162564 dated 30/11/2016 of the

Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.EI.Ed. course" on the

grounds that "as per VT report the institution has 2395 sq. mts. only. The reply submitted

in response to the show cause notice of NRC, NCTE dt. 10.02.2016 is not acceptable."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Ajit Kumar Singh, Chairman, Ram Naval Singh Smarak

rylahavidyalay, Bhikhampur-'-.Mohammadabad Gohana, Mau, Uttar Pradesh presented the

case of the appellant institution on 26/08/2017. In the appeal and during personal

p+esentation and in a letter dt. 26.08.2017, it was submitted that "as per VT report the

i;Hstitution has 2395 sq. mts. only. NRC failed to observe that the appellant has also

s'ubmitted the separate building Completion Certificates for the B.A. & B.Ed. and D.EI.Ed.

course. The expert visit team conducted the visit of the Appellant institution for the

D.EI.Ed. course only and they have only taken the documents in respect of the D.EI.Ed.

course because impugned order is bad in law because the LOI could not had been issued

ifthe appellant had not satisfied because the SCERT also conducted its visit and granted

the affiliation to the petitioner institution after verifying the infrastructural facility. The

~~pellant, in their letter dt. 26.08.2017 submitted that in response to the show cause.\4

ri'otice decided upon by the NRC in their 250th meeting held on 26-27, February, 2016 on

the ground of inadequacy of built up area, he sent a reply on 01.03.2016, which was

received on 03.03.2016.

AND WHEREAS the Committee noted that the NRC in the first instance in their

lKrder dt. 2.5.2016 granted recognition to the appellant institution for conducting D.EI.Ed.

SQurse with an intake of 100 students. Subsequently, the NRC in their corrigendum dt.

~i;:6.2016 deleted the names of certain institutions, including that of the appellant\ ~"".

I ~i ~t

institution, from th1eirrecognition order dt. 2.5.2016 as they decided to issue show caus~I

notices to them. NRC issued a show cause notice to the appellant institution on 10.6.2016, '. ,

on the grounds th~t the total built-up area in the possession of the institution is only 2395;

Sq.mtrs. which i$ just sufficient to run the existing B.Ed. course of two units. TheI

Committee notedl from the file that the appellant sent replies to the show cause notice

twice, one dated 1.7.2016, which was received on 6.9.2016 and another of the same datei ' ,

which was received on 5.10.2016. The Committee noted that the file of the NRC does nat

indicate the consideration of the replies submitted by the appellant and the building, "

completion certificates enclosed by them. In these circumstances, the Committee

concluded that the matter deserved to be remanded to the NRC with a direction to

consider the repllies of the appellant to the show cause notice dt. 10.6.2016 and take

further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014.,II

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, document$I

available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing~

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with a, .] "

direction to consider the replies of the appellant to the show cause notice dt. 10.6.2016

and take further action as per the NCTE Regulations, 2014.I

NOW THeREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Ram NavalSingh Smarak Mahavidyalay, Bhikhampur, Mohammadabad Gohana, Mau -276129, Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

( anjay Awasthi 'Member Secretary

1. The Manager, Ram Naval Singh Smarak Mahavidyalay, Bhikhampur,Mohammadabad Gohana, Mau - 276129, Uttar Pradesh

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of SchoolEducation' & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

3. Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1C Buildirg, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of UttarPradesh, Lucknow.,

I,II'

S~( .•jfto( •••.••.•"•••"t ~ •••...-~

;/'tCTE

F.No.89-586/E;-19184/2017Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

Hans Shawan,Wing II, 1, Sahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002

. II, ORDER

Date: \ (;,110\ r:,-I

, WHEREAS the appeal of Swami Shivendrapuri Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Belauna

Kala, Mariyahu, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh dated 17.04.2017 is against the Order No.

NCTE/NRC/NRCAPP201616316/Bachelor of Elementary Education [B.EI.Ed.]/UP/2017-

18/2 dated 15/03/2017 of the Northern Regional Committee, refusing recognition for

conducting B.EI.Ed. course on the grounds that "SCN was issued to the institution on

~5.02.2017. The reply received on 21.02.2017 in the office of NRC was considered andc

the following observations were made:- A letter from the Registrar of the affiliating

University dated 22.05.2016, clearly states that land, building & other resources being

l:Jsedfor Shastri course shall not be used for the proposed B.EI.Ed. course. This implies

that the applicant institution is not a composite institution Hence, the Committee decided

(hat the application is rejected and recognition/ permission is refused u/s 14/15 (3)(b) of

the NCTE Act, 1993."

AND WHEREAS Sh. Ashim Duney, Secretary and Sourabh Dubey, Member,

Swami Shivendrapuri Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Belauna Kala, Mariyahu, Jaunpur, Uttar

Pradesh presented the case of th;e appellant institution on 26/08/2017. In the appeal and

during personal presentation it: was submitted that 'The applicant institute Swami.•..8hivendrapuri Sanskrit Mahavidyalay, Belauna kala, Jaunpur, U.P. has extra land andI>

Building for B.EI.Ed. course as per norms beside Shastri course infrastructure and

Governing trust has passed a resolution for same. In reference with same the Registrar,

Sampoornanand Sanskrit University Varanasi has issued a new letter no. G 1169/17 Dt.

19/03/2017 with approval of Vice- Chancellor stating the above mentioned fact that

proposed course may be conducted in the extra space available in the college premises

for which university has no objection. So kindly taking into notice the newly added fact

p1ease reconsider our application and grant us the recognition of proposed B.EI.Ed.~";

course.f~~

II

AND WHEREAS the Committee noted that the Sampurnand Sanskrit University,I •

Varanasi has giveh a new letter dt. 19.3.2017 conveying their No Objection for conductin"~,the proposed B.ELEd. course in the land and building available in the complex. Since the

objection raised by the NRC in their refusal order has been met, the Committee concluded

that the matter dekerved to be remanded to the NRC with a direction to consider the lett~t ,:.

of the university ~ated 19.3.2017 and take further action as per the NCTE Regulation~fI ••

2014. The appellant is directed to forward a copy of the university's letter dt. 19.3.201 V,,

submitted in appeal to the NRC within 15 days of receipt of the orders on appeal.II

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the memorandum of appeal, affidavit, document~

available on records and considering the oral arguments advanced during the hearing;

the Committee concluded that the appeal deserves to be remanded to NRC with a,

direction to consider the letter of the university dated 19.3.2017 and take further actio~h.:~as per the NCTE: Regulations, 2014. The appellant is directed to forward a copy of th.~'.••...university's letter'dt. 19.3.2017 submitted in appeal to the NRC within 15 days of receip},

of the orders on ~ppeal.I

J"~'

,NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Swam!

Shivendrapuri Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Belauna Kala, Mariyahu, Jaunpur - 222162,Uttar Pradesh to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

II

(Sanjay Awasthi:).Member Secretary"

1. Swami Shivendrapuri Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Belauna Kala, Mariyahu,IJaunpur -;-222162, Uttar Pradesh .

2. The Secre:tary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Schoo"1Educationi& Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

3. Regional Oirector, Northern Regional Committee, Fourth Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II,L1C Buildi~g, Bhawani Singh Marg, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur - 302005, Rajasthan.

4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of UttarPradesh, ~ucknow. );,

'. R" •.1~~' :"".t-~~NCTE

F.No.89-145/2017 Appeal/16th Meeting-2017NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION


Date: \ b110111-"-ORDER

IWHEREAS the appeal of Maa Rewathi College of Education , Mandla, Madhya, .

Pradesh dated 16.2.2017 agai~st the order no. WRC/NCTE/APP3118/254th/D.EI.Ed.

'(MP)/2016/169556 dated 20.6.2016 of the Western Regional Committee granting

.recognition for one unit of D.EI.Ed. programme whereas the application was for seeking

two units of D.EI.Ed. programme.

AND WHEREAS Sh. Abhishek Chobey, Representative, Maa Rewathi College of

Education, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh presented the case of appellant institution on

4.5.2017. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that "we have

sufficient built up area and given 1+15 staff profile for two units of D.EI.Ed. course".,

.r,~ AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that appeal made by appellant is for

9,rant of recognition for two units of D.EI.Ed. programme where as the impugned

recognition order is for granting recognition for one unit (50 seats).

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that inspection of the appellant institution wasr-conducted on 19.11.2015 with a proposed intake of one unit of D.EI.Ed programme.

Appeal Committee noted that the Visiting Team had made certain adverse observation's

fi1 the report such as:

tv i) The location of the buil?ing did not match with the description given in the land

document.

ii) The existing building did not match with the approved building plan which has

been submitted to WRC.

iii) The building shown to Visiting Team by the management has eight

classrooms, four labs, one seminar room, common room, one multipurpose

hall with tin roof.

iv) Furniture and equipment did not have identification mark as per stock register.. !

: .

'.f

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that appellant institution was" .,J

issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 23.12.2015 but the adverse remarks made by

V.T. were not Communicated to the appellant. Appeal Committee further noted that basec:l

on an order of Hon'ble High Court dated 23.11.2015, WRC opted to process thpt

applications and issued a Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 26.04.2016 to the appellaBt'...•..;.

institution for D.EI.Ed. programme with an annual intake of 50 students. It is doubtful;':'{,

whether the adverse findings of the Inspection Team were ever brought to notice of

Hon'ble Court. As location of land and building itself did not match with the submitted

documents, there was no sanctity to find out whether the infrastructure is suitable since

a part of the structure was having tin roof also.

AND WHEREAS appellant during the course of appeal presentation stated th~t:

appellant institution is at present recognised for conducting 2 units of B.Ed., one unit of'.~.

BA. B.Ed. and one unit of D.EI.Ed. programme and built up area of 4034 Sq. Meter~~:

Appeal Committee, before taking a decision on the appeal filed by appellant, decided to

get a composite inspection for all the teacher education programmes applied for and

being conducted by the appellant institution strictly restricting the inspection to the land

and building for which documents were submitted. Report of the composite inspection

report has now been made available to the Appeal Committee.. .

(\ ".

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee noted that the submission made by appellant\

seeking two units of D.EI.Ed. programme as against the one unit for which recognition'

was granted on 20.6.2016, is primality on two grounds i.e. it has sufficient built up area

and has given staff profile for two units". Appeal Committee further noted that impugned

recognition order dated 20.6.2016 does not specify any deficiency on the above grounds

and also does not mention any other reason for recognising only one unit and not two as

applied for by the appellant institution. :-~AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee further noted that the visiting team in iff

. ,inspection report dated 19-20 August, 2017 intimated that the institution is in possession ..'

of land measuring 4000 sq.mtrs. and a built up area of 4034 Sq.mtrs. The specifications

of land and built up area are the same as were mentioned in the affidavit submitted by

II

appellant at the time of applying 'for the programme. Appeal Committee further noted that

appellant institution on getting the LOI dated 26.4.2016 for one unit immediately wrote

back to WRC that it had applied for two units and LOI should accordingly be modified for

two units. WRC without intimating any reason for not giving two units, issued impugned

recognition order granting recognition for conducting one unit of D.EI.Ed. programme.

AND WHEREAS Appeal Committee considering that impugned recognition order

is devoid of any reason for not granting two units, decided to remand back the case to

WRC for issue of a speaking order disposing of the request made by appellant vide its

letter dated 26.4.2016 seeking modification in the LOI. The case is accordingly remanded

back to WRC for revisiting the case.

AND WHEREAS after perusal of the Memoranda of Appeal, affidavit, documentsfion record and oral arguments advanced during the hearing, Appeal Committee concluded

to remand back the case to WRC for revisiting its decision to grant only one unit of

D.EI.Ed. progamme.

NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Maa RewatiCollege of Education, Jantipur Road, Badi Khairi, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh -481661 to the NRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above.

( anjay Awasthi)Member Secretary

.,' 1. The Manager, Maa Rewati College of Education, Jantipur Road, Badi Khairi,Mandla, Madhya Pradesh - 481661


.\ 3. The Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, NCTE Manas Bhawan,Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002

. 4. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government ofMadhya Pradesh, Bhopal.