1 complete student portfolio contents dec 2013 v2

39
STUDENT PORTFOLIO CONTENTS: (1) FACULTY’S VISION & MISSION (2) PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (PEO) (3) PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (PO) (4) PROGRAMME OUTCOME MATRIX ! Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) Mechanical – EM220 (Structure D) ! Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Manufacturing) (Honours) – EM221/241 (5) PROGRAMME OUTCOME RUBRICS (PO1 – PO12) (6) PROGRAMME OUTCOME - BASED ASSESSMENT FORM

Upload: loxman-zahari

Post on 25-Sep-2015

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

port

TRANSCRIPT

  • STUDENT PORTFOLIO

    CONTENTS: (1) FACULTYS VISION & MISSION

    (2) PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

    (PEO)

    (3) PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (PO)

    (4) PROGRAMME OUTCOME MATRIX

    ! Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) Mechanical EM220 (Structure D)

    ! Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Manufacturing) (Honours) EM221/241

    (5) PROGRAMME OUTCOME RUBRICS

    (PO1 PO12)

    (6) PROGRAMME OUTCOME - BASED ASSESSMENT

    FORM

  • STUDENT PORTFOLIO

    (1) FACULTYS VISION & MISSION

  • UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    VISION

    A leader in the mechanical engineering

    discipline towards global excellence

    through world class education and

    research.

    MISSION

    To produce graduates with strong

    mechanical engineering fundamentals,

    analytical and leadership skills,

    competitive, creative, innovative and

    professional ethics.

  • STUDENT PORTFOLIO

    (2) PROGRAMME

    EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (PEO)

  • UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (PEO)

    Specific goals consistent with the mission and vision of the Institute of Higher Learning (IHL) are responsive to the expressed interest of programme stakeholders, describing expected achievements of graduates in their career and professional life.

    PEO 1 - Engineers adapt and transform the acquired knowledge in public and private sectors with respect to related professional fields. (KPI: 70% employers satisfaction on alumni career progression; 25% of alumni holding leadership position having authority and subordinates) PEO 2 - Engineers are expert and competent in their professional fields.

  • (KPI: 5% of alumni are registered professional engineers or engineering experts or equivalent after five (5) years of employment; 70% of alumni work in related engineering job functions)

    PEO 3 - Engineers are globally competitive and professionally employed in multinational/international organizations. (KPI: 30% of alumni work in multinational/international companies or equivalent international levels) PEO 4 - Engineers practice ethical and professional values in their respective fields. (KPI: 90% of stakeholders/respondents are satisfied with alumni ethical and professional values)

  • STUDENT PORTFOLIO

    (3) PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (PO)

  • UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    PROGRAMME OUTCOMES (PO)

    PO DESCRIPTION EDUCATIONAL DOMAIN

    PO1 Able to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering specialisation to the solution of complex engineering problems

    C

    PO2 Able to identify, formulate, research literature and analyse complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences

    C

    PO3

    Able to design solutions for complex engineering problems and design systems, components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal, and environmental considerations

    C

    PO4

    Able to conduct investigation into complex problems using research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information to provide valid conclusions

    C

    PO5 Able to create, select and apply appropriate techniques resources, and modern engineering and IT tools, including prediction and modelling, to complex engineering activities, with an understanding of the limitations

    P

    PO6 Able to apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice

    A

    PO7 Able to understand the impact of professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts and demonstrate knowledge of and need for sustainable development

    A

    PO8 Able to apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of engineering practice A

    PO9

    Able to communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions

    A

    PO10 Able to function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings P

    PO11 Able to recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change

    P

    PO12

    Able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work (including as an entrepreneur), as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments

    P

    NOTE :

    C - Cognitive

    P Psychomotor

    A - Affective

  • STUDENT PORTFOLIO

    (4) PROGRAMME OUTCOME Matrix

  • UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    ! Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) Mechanical EM220 ! Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Manufacturing) (Honours) EM221/EM241

    PEO Description

    Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal PO-PEO MAPPING Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) Mechanical - EM220 Bachelor of Mech. Engineering (Manufacturing) (Hons.) - EM221 E

    ngin

    eers

    ada

    pt a

    nd t

    rans

    form

    th

    e ac

    quir

    ed k

    now

    ledg

    e in

    pub

    lic

    and

    priv

    ate

    sect

    ors

    wit

    h re

    spec

    t to

    rel

    ated

    pro

    fess

    iona

    l fie

    lds.

    (K

    PI:

    70%

    em

    ploy

    ers

    sat

    isfa

    ctio

    n on

    alu

    mni

    car

    eer

    prog

    ress

    ion

    (Ada

    pt);

    25%

    of a

    lum

    ni h

    oldi

    ng

    lead

    ersh

    ip p

    osit

    ion

    havi

    ng

    auth

    orit

    y an

    d su

    bord

    inat

    es)

    Eng

    inee

    rs a

    re e

    xper

    t an

    d co

    mpe

    tent

    in t

    heir

    pro

    fess

    iona

    l fie

    lds.

    (K

    PI:

    5%

    of a

    lum

    ni a

    re r

    egis

    tere

    d pr

    ofes

    sion

    al e

    ngin

    eers

    or

    engi

    neer

    ing

    expe

    rts

    or e

    quiv

    alen

    t af

    ter

    five

    (5) y

    ears

    em

    ploy

    men

    t; 70

    % o

    f alu

    mni

    wor

    k in

    rel

    ated

    en

    gine

    erin

    g jo

    b fu

    ncti

    ons)

    E

    ngin

    eers

    are

    glo

    bally

    co

    mpe

    titi

    ve a

    nd p

    rofe

    ssio

    nally

    em

    ploy

    ed in

    m

    ulti

    nati

    onal

    /int

    erna

    tion

    al

    orga

    niza

    tion

    s.

    (KP

    I: 3

    0% o

    f alu

    mni

    wor

    k in

    m

    ulti

    nati

    onal

    /in

    tern

    atio

    nal

    com

    pani

    es o

    r eq

    uiva

    lent

    in

    tern

    atio

    nal l

    evel

    s)

    Eng

    inee

    rs p

    ract

    ice

    ethi

    cal a

    nd

    prof

    essi

    onal

    val

    ues

    in t

    heir

    re

    spec

    tive

    fiel

    ds.

    (KP

    I: 9

    0% o

    f sta

    keho

    lder

    s /r

    espo

    nden

    ts a

    re s

    atis

    fied

    wit

    h al

    umni

    eth

    ical

    and

    pro

    fess

    iona

    l va

    lues

    )

    PO Description PEO1 PEO2 PEO3 PEO4

    PO1 Able to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems;

  • PO2 Able to identify, formulate, research literature and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences;

    PO3 Able to design solutions for complex engineering problems and design systems, components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal, and environmental considerations

    PO4 Able to conduct investigation into complex problems using research based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information to provide valid conclusions

    PO5 Able to create, select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools, including prediction and modeling, to complex engineering activities, with an understanding of the limitations

    PO6 Able to apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice.

    PO7 Able to understand the impact of professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts and demonstrate knowledge of and need for sustainable development

    PO8 Able to apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of engineering practice.

    PO9 Able to communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions

    PO10 Able to function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings.

    PO11 Able to recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.

    PO12 Able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work (including as an entrepreneur), as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.

  • STUDENT PORTFOLIO

    (5) PROGRAMME OUTCOME Rubric (PO1 PO12)

  • UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 1: Able to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering specialisation to the solution of

    complex engineering problems

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Demonstrates specific engineering knowledge of course area.

    Minimally understands and tries to apply mathematical and scientific principles toward solving engineering problems.

    Shows effort to evaluate and analyze process(es) and/or data.

    Adequately understands and applies mathematical and scientific principles toward solving engineering problems.

    Adequately evaluates and analyzes process(es) and/or data.

    Understands and applies mathematical and scientific principles toward solving engineering problems.

    Skilled at evaluating and analyzing process(es) and/or data.

  • PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    ii. Demonstrates analysis and judgment.

    Tries to identify and understand issues or problems.

    Demonstrates deficiencies with integrating information from other sources to determine cause and effect relationships.

    Struggles to choose a course of action or develop an appropriate solution.

    Frequently identifies and understands issues or problems.

    Demonstrates potential to integrate information from other sources to determine cause and effects relationships.

    Chooses a reasonable course of action or develops an appropriate solution.

    Always identifies and understands issues or problems.

    Integrates information from many sources to determine cause and effects relationships.

    Effectively chooses a course of action or develops an appropriate solution.

    iii. Demonstrates knowledge of mathematics.

    Minimally understands the mathematical and scientific principles involved.

    Adequately understands and applies appropriate mathematics.

    Handles algebra, trigonometry and calculus with minor errors.

    Understands and applies appropriate mathematics.

    Handles algebra, trigonometry and calculus with minimal errors.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 2: Able to identify, formulate, research literature and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences;

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Writes, observes, and listens with comprehension and critical perception.

    Misunderstands basic meaning of the

    concepts presented. Fails to follow basic themes or

    arguments and is not able to connect them to existing knowledge.

    Fails to recognize the credibility of sources.

    Understands basic meaning of the concepts presented.

    Follows themes and arguments, and connects them to existing knowledge.

    Fairly recognize the credibility of sources.

    Understands fully the concepts presented.

    Expands on or evaluates themes and arguments, and connects them to existing knowledge.

    Consistently recognize the credibility of sources.

  • PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    ii. Communicates clearly, precisely, and in a well-organized manner.

    Unclear objectives, controlling ideas, main points or argument.

    Fails to use structure appropriate to the discipline.

    Each section is unrelated to other paragraphs or sub-points and offer inadequate or inappropriate examples and evidence.

    Poorly organized and structured communication.

    Fails to employ transition between ideas

    Fails to use or violates standards for academic communication.

    Fairly clear objectives, controlling

    ideas, main point or argument. Uses structure appropriate to the

    discipline. Each section develops a main idea,

    offers examples and evidence, and suggests some relationship to other paragraphs and sub-points.

    Fairly organized and structured communication.

    Generally employs some form of transition between ideas.

    Generally follows standards for academic communication.

    Clear objectives, controlling ideas,

    main points or argument. Demonstrates creative and/or

    effective command of discipline-appropriate structure.

    Each section develops a main idea carefully, makes thorough use of appropriate examples and evidence, and has a logical relationship to other paragraphs and sub-points.

    Very organized and structured communication

    Consistently employs effective transitions between ideas.

    Consistently follows standards for academic communications; shows creativity in application of these standards.

    iii. Demonstrate a large and varied vocabulary.

    Poor selection of words and specific

    terminology to explain the meaning of context.

    Incorrectly identifies the correct meaning of many words within the context.

    Relies on repetition or limited diction

    Fairly good selection of words and

    specific terminology to explain the meaning of context.

    Generally identifies the correct meaning of words within the context.

    Uses a varied vocabulary to convey ideas, using little ineffective repetition

    Very good selection of words and

    specific terminology to explain the meaning of context.

    Consistently identifies the correct meaning of words within the context.

    Consistently uses a rich and varied

  • PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    to convey ideas. Misuses discipline-specific terminology

    or basic vocabulary.

    or limited diction. Generally uses correct/appropriate

    word choice and discipline-specific terminology.

    vocabulary to convey ideas. Consistently uses

    correct/appropriate word choice and discipline-specific terminology.

    iv. Recognizes and use a variety of communication forms and styles.

    Inappropriate rhetoric form. Does not understand the concept of

    non-literal expression.

    Fairly appropriate rhetoric form. Recognizes non-literal expression, but

    use may not always be appropriate.

    Very appropriate rhetoric form. Recognizes and uses non-literal

    expression appropriately and effectively.

    v. Use computer technologies or other technologies for communications.

    Poor selection of software for communicating informations or is unable to use a computer to communicate or compile information.

    Unable to communicate information using web pages and/or presentation software.

    Does not use basic email for communication or fails to follow basic email etiquette (netiquette) in communications.

    Fairly good selection of software for communicating informations or is unable to use a computer to communicate or compile information

    Communicates information using basic features of web pages and/or presentation software

    Successfully uses email for communication and follows basic rules of email etiquette (netiquette) in communications.

    Very good selection of software

    for communicating informations or is unable to use a computer to communicate or compile information.

    Communicates information using advanced features of web pages and/or presentation software.

    Successfully uses some of the non-basic features of email programs (such as sending and receiving attachments, setting up group email lists, or organizing mailboxes).

    vi. Accommodate ideas from members or

    Poor justification of ideas. Poor rationalization of ideas.

    Fairly good justification of ideas. Fairly good rationalization of ideas.

    Very good justification of ideas

  • PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    others. Very good rationalization of ideas.

    vii. Multi-culture communication.

    Unable to present multi-culture relation.

    Able to present multi-culture relation. Successfully present multi-culture relation.

    viii. Non verbal communication.

    Unable to use proper nonverbal

    communication such as eye contacts, body language and gesture.

    Able to use nonverbal communication. Successfully use nonverbal communication.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 3: Able to design solutions for complex engineering problems and design systems, components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal, and environmental considerations

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Chooses appropriate analytic and design tools and models for engineering problems.

    Some evidence of the use analytical tools and modeling for the problem.

    Shows reasonable familiarity and use of analytic tools and modeling.

    Analysis and design tools used in the

    problem are well-suited for the problem.

    ii. Demonstrates effective practical and analytic techniques in solving

    engineering problems.

    Uses some engineering skills to determine problem solution.

    Good use of engineering skills to

    analyze and design a solution to the problem.

    Excellent ability to mix solid

    engineering analysis with practical design and implementation considerations.

    iii. Shows depth of knowledge in using fundamental and advanced engineering

    approaches to problems.

    Identifies most of the major issues and attempts to solve in an analytic manner.

    Good ability to isolate the problem and formulate a solution. Uses engineering

    approach to solve problems.

    Demonstrates clear, sound reasoning

    in identifying the underlying engineering issues and formulating a plan for solution.

    Uses the appropriate engineering analysis for each part of the problem.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 4: Able to conduct investigation into complex problems using research based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information to provide valid conclusions

    CTPS : CRITICAL THINKING , PROBLEM SOLVING

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Demonstrates specific engineering knowledge of subject area.

    Attempts to apply mathematical and scientific principles to solution of open ended engineering problems.

    Assumptions are weak and the problem to be solved is poorly laid out.

    The solution methodology is unclear and incorrect.

    Can apply mathematical and scientific principles to solution of open ended engineering problems.

    Can make assumptions and reasonably identify the problem to be solved.

    The solution methodology is clear with minor errors.

    Can readily apply mathematical and scientific principles to solution of open ended engineering problems.

    Can make appropriate assumptions and clearly identify the problem to be solved.

    The solution methodology is clear and correct.

    ii. Critical thinking. Kim (CTPS 1)

    Seldom identifies and understands issues, problems and opportunities.

    Has difficulty gathering information and drawing conclusions.

    Often identifies and understands issues, problems and opportunities.

    Gathers and thinks about information and offers responsible interpretations; provides enough information to support conclusions.

    Always identifies and understands issues, problems and opportunities.

    Gathers and evaluates information, chooses a clear interpretation, and provides enough information (quality and quantity) to support conclusions.

  • iii. Evaluate situation and attempt to get point of view. (CTPS 2)

    Needs assistance in evaluating situations. Does not seek different points of view to

    identify the root cause of a problem.

    Can assess situations and arrive at objective evaluations.

    Seeks different points of view and makes evaluations, based on facts, to identify the root cause of a problem.

    Generates criteria needed to assess situations and arrive at objective evaluations.

    Seeks different points of view and makes evaluations, based on facts, to identify the root cause of a problem; verifies whether a solution works; and acts on opportunities for improvement.

    iv. Problem solving.

    Sometimes uses effective approaches to develop solutions.

    Occasionally takes action inconsistent with facts, constraints or probable consequences.

    With assistance, partially able to explain a problem.

    Usually uses effective approaches to develop solutions.

    Normally takes action consistent with facts, constraints and probably consequences.

    Independently able to explain a problem.

    Repeatedly uses effective approaches to develop solutions.

    Unfailingly takes action consistent with facts, constraints and probable consequences.

    Able to provide explanation of problem, develop evaluated solutions, and make recommendations.

    v. Assess own creativity.

    (CTPS 3)

    Usually relies on others to generate suggestions.

    Uses the same strategy most of the time.

    Suggests effective ways for getting a job done.

    Identifies a variety of strategies, chooses an appropriate one, and applies the strategy(ies) singly or in combination.

    Suggests and evaluates effective solutions for getting a job done.

    Compares a variety of strategies, chooses the most effective, and applies the strategy(ies) to improve the situation.

    vi. Effective communication in identifying, formulating and solving engineering problems.

    Usually stresses major points and follows a logical sequence.

    Sometimes makes effective use of modern presentation tools.

    Occasionally uses terms, examples, and graphs that is not meaningful to audience.

    Frequently stresses major points and follows a logical sequence.

    Often makes effective use of modern presentation tools. Usually uses terms, examples, and graphs that is meaningful to audience.

    Always stresses major points and follows a logical sequence.

    Frequently makes effective use of modern presentation tools.

    Repeatedly uses terms, examples, and graphs that is meaningful to audience.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 5: Able to create, select and apply appropriate techniques resources, and modern engineering and IT tools, including prediction and modelling, to complex engineering activities, with an understanding of the limitations

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Identify Design Problem and Constraints.

    Evidence of some understanding of the problem, deficiencies will impact the quality of the solution.

    Basically sound understanding of the

    problem and constraints, has missed some key points.

    Clear and complete identification of the design goal and the constraints.

    ii. Explores Alternative Designs.

    Single design presented or unreasonable alternative presented.

    Alternative approaches explored to a limited depth.

    Reasonable alternatives explored to arrive at final design.

    iii. Uses analytic tools to aid in design process and support final design.

    Minimal application and use of appropriate tools.

    Uses some analytic tools with moderate effectiveness.

    Selects appropriate tools and uses

    them effectively in developing design.

    iv. Evaluate the sustainable aspect (environmental issues, safety & health and cost).

    Contain substantial error in sustainable analysis or analysis.

    Reasonable sustainable analysis is performed.

    Adequately fulfill the sustainable analysis requirement or constraint.

    Effective usage of sustainable analysis.

    Fulfill exactly the sustainable analysis requirement or constraint imposed.

    v. Documented Final Design.

    Missing major calculations or design justification.

    Incomplete-missing important documentation or calculations.

    Complete, well documented, referenced final design.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 6: Able to apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice.

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Ability to communicate and interact within group member.

    Unable to communicate and interact with other member.

    Shows willingness to participate but shows moderate communication skills.

    Shows strong interest and

    communicate effectively with group member.

    ii. Ability to understand and take role as group member and leader.

    Unable to take role either as leader and group member.

    Occasionally demonstrates the capability of taking different role.

    Successfully shows the capability in of taking role as leader and member.

    iii. Ability to respect the opinion and trust of other group members.

    Show intolerance of individual difference and unwilling to accept responsibility.

    Recognizes, accept and tolerates

    individual differences in group.

    Willing to accept and tolerate

    diversity of ideas and take responsibility.

    iv. Active participation passive in group decision making and interactive.

    Makes decisions hastily. Needs encouragement to contribute

    ideas.

    Occasionally participate in group

    decision making.

    Very active and provide encouragement of group members.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 7: Able to understand the impact of professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts and demonstrate knowledge of and need for sustainable development

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Understand the implication of economics, environment and culture to the professional practice.

    Has been exposed to a code of ethics, including professional behavior for interaction with co-workers, superiors, and clients, as well as the general public.

    Has been exposed to a code of ethics, including professional behavior for interaction with co-workers, superiors, and clients, as well as the general public.

    Has been exposed to a code of ethics, including professional behavior for interaction with co-workers, superiors, and clients, as well as the general public.

    ii. Practice a professional code of ethics for engineers.

    Unable to practice professional code of practice.

    Demonstrates this understanding

    through acceptable behavior on a professional level activity.

    Practice professional code of ethics

    through exemplary conduct on a professional level activity.

    iii. The handling of proprietary information, licensed software, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, citation of sources, quotations, and copyright.

    Indicates that the students believe that the impacts on society are worth investigating but does not stress their importance.

    Clearly indicates the importance of the impacts of technology on society.

    Clearly indicates and stresses the importance of the impacts of technology on society and our need to be concerned about them or explicitly acknowledges the responsibility borne by technologies for the effect of their professional work on society.

  • PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    iv. The extent to which discussion of the impact of technology on society reflected recognition of the social responsibilities of scientists and engineers.

    Indicates that the students believe that the impacts on society are worth investigating but does not stress their importance.

    Clearly indicates the importance of the impacts of technology on society.

    Clearly indicates and stresses the importance of the impacts of technology on society and our need to be concerned about them or explicitly acknowledges the responsibility borne by technologies for the effect of their professional work on society.

    v. Safety and health issue Needs considerable assistance with

    safety practices and procedures; is not aware of the acts that govern these.

    Needs no assistance with using safety practices and procedures.

    Needs no assistance with using safety

    practices and procedures; knows the acts that govern these.

    vi. Environmental aspects Not stated any appreciation towards

    the importance of environmental concern.

    Mostly effective in addressing environmental issues.

    Effective in addressing environmental issues leading to a better result.

    vii. Healthy, safety and risk management

    Demonstrate very little knowledge and relationship in health, safety and risk issues to design.

    Partial or limited coverage of the subject matter.

    Demonstrate adequate knowledge and relationship in health, safety and risk issues to design.

    Adequate and effective coverage of the subject matter.

    Demonstrated comprehensive knowledge and relationship in health, safety and risk issues to design.

    Extensive and detailed coverage of the subject matter.

    viii. Evaluate solution for sustainable development

    Show no concern towards sustainable development.

    Sustainable development is well mention.

    Successfully address the importance of

    sustainable development with supporting result and discussion.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 8: Able to apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of engineering practice

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Acquired and applied knowledge not learned from previous course work.

    The project makes use of very little background knowledge or methodologies not likely to learned coursework from previous.

    The project contains an acceptable review of the literature on a topic and/or makes moderate use of suitable

    methodologies not likely learned in the coursework.

    The project contains critical review of the literature on a topic and/or makes extensive and effective use of recognized and suitable methodologies not likely learned in the students coursework.

    ii. Posses personal growth.

    Requires considerable assistance to realize the need for personal growth.

    Able to assess areas in need of personal growth.

    Responsible for planning and creating own growth experiences.

    iii. Shows the capability to develop lifelong learning.

    Has difficulty assessing personal strengths and areas for development.

    Able to set learning goals; creates a

    process for planning and achieving them.

    Ability to identify and accesses own learning sources and opportunities.

    iv. Demonstrate curiosity towards new knowledge.

    Lack of interest and curiosity in acquiring new knowledge.

    Show interest and curiosity in

    acquiring new knowledge and expanding it.

    Show strong interest and curiosity in

    acquiring new knowledge and expanding it.

    v. Information management.

    Able to search for information using only one information system (e.g., library, bookstore).

    Able to locate and organize information using at least two types of appropriate technologies or information systems.

    Able to locate relevant information using more than two appropriate technologies and information systems.

    Independently organizes information using appropriate technology and a recognized system of organization (e.g., alphabet, subject, topic).

    vi. Accessing, analyzing, and applying knowledge and Needs assistance to find information Finds information independently. Independently and efficiently finds

  • PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    skills. when needed. Needs considerable assistance in

    determining how information applies to and is relevant to a task or subject area.

    Needs considerable assistance in this area (e.g., writing a report, acquiring or refining a skill, making a presentation).

    Independently determines how information applies to and is relevant to a task or subject area.

    Able to apply knowledge and skills.

    information and assists those who need help.

    Critically analyzes how information applies to and is relevant to a task or subject area in any discipline.

    Able to apply knowledge and skills and include criteria for evaluation of the product.

    vii. Able to develop and take entrepreneurship opportunity.

    Needs assistance develop and take business opportunity.

    Develops and takes the business opportunity independently.

    Able to use appropriate strategy to

    develop, explore and take the business opportunity.

    viii. Plan (set-up) and setup own business.

    Able to plan and set-up own business with considerable assistance.

    Able to plan and set-up own business independently.

    Successfully plan and set-up own business independently.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 9: Able to communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Shows skill in carrying out experiments.

    Unable to carry out experiment without assistance.

    Students capable of carrying out experiment.

    Student capable of carrying

    out experiments smoothly with minimum assistance.

    ii. Shows skill in developing goals and procedure (design & project).

    Lacking or incorrect theoretical approach, test plan will produce experimental data that may or may not be suitable.

    Student able to perform an analysis in describing the problem and capable to plan an experimental procedure.

    Clear explanation and

    identification of important analytical problem features for investigation of laboratory experiments.

    Well prepared and execute plan of the experimental.

    iii. Demonstrates use of judgment and insight to design (formulate) and present experimental results.

    Data presented in an understandable manner and does not show relation to theoretical trends.

    Experimental trends are discovered and presented using charts, graphs, or other presentation format.

    Students have the capability

    to relate theoretical analysis and experimental result to come out a clear and understandable conclusion.

    Student is able to present experimental result using appropriate charts graphs and

  • PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Shows skill in carrying out experiments.

    Unable to carry out experiment without assistance.

    Students capable of carrying out experiment.

    Student capable of carrying

    out experiments smoothly with minimum assistance.

    others presentation format.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 10: Able to function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    i. Demonstrate communication and interaction.

    Some evidence of communication and interaction.

    Rarely has confidence to evaluate own work.

    Usually acts without considering personal ethics when dealing with people, problems, and situations.

    Useful technical communication among participants.

    Has confidence to make sure final products meet standards.

    Consistently uses honesty, integrity, and an acceptable code of ethics when dealing with people, problems, and situations.

    Solid evidence of effective technical interaction among participants, with good use of technical communication tools.

    Has confidence to make sure final products exceed standards.

    Shows initiative and effort in modeling honesty, integrity, and an acceptable code of ethics when dealing with people, problems, and situations.

    ii. Initiative. Limited contributions of team members. Contributions by all members of the team.

    Uses technical strengths of each team member to full advantage.

    Full participation and a appropriate technical contributions of each member.

  • PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    iii. Demonstrate professional responsibility and skills.

    Little evidence of leadership, cooperation, or interaction.

    Occasionally sets goals; does not have a process for achieving goals.

    May not fully appreciate the need to set and reach goals.

    Lacks motivation to set goals.

    Some planning and interaction is evident.

    Sets realistic, attainable goals; uses a process for achieving them.

    Sets and achieves goals on schedule. Sets new goals independently.

    Group work shows organization, planning, and productive interaction.

    Sets challenging goals with a step-by-step plan and time frame for achieving them.

    Sets goals, and achieves them ahead of schedule; offers to mentor others.

    Sets new and challenging goals independently.

    iv. Use of Diverse (Multi- disciplinary) Technology.

    Some integration of multiple technologies.

    Successful use of a variety of technologies in the project.

    Aggressive investigation and use of

    diverse technology by team members.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 11: Able to recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    POOR (1) (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3) (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    v. Indicate an understanding or appreciation of contemporary issues.

    The assignment not dealt with an aspect of contemporary issues and the report says non about the basic societal issues.

    The assignment dealt with a little aspect of contemporary issues and the report indicated that the students understood and appreciated the basic societal issues.

    The assignment dealt clearly with an aspect of contemporary issues and the report indicated that the students understood clearly the detailed scope and character of the larger societal issues.

    vi. Public interest and societal impact.

    No consideration of public interest and societal impact and no evaluation in engineering project/product.

    Effective evaluation of public interest and societal impact and little evaluation in engineering project/product.

    Effective assessment of public interest and societal impact and detailed evaluation in engineering project/product.

  • PROGRAM OUTCOME RUBRIC

    PROGRAM OUTCOME 12: Able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering and management principles and apply these to ones own work (including as an entrepreneur), as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments

  • STUDENT PORTFOLIO

    (6) PROGRAMME OUTCOME-Based Assessment Form

  • PROGRAMME OUTCOME-BASED ASSESSMENT FORM

    STUDENT NAME: PROGRAMME : EM220 / EM221 STUDENT ID : SEMESTER :

    Total average scale for all courses (1 to 5): Scale for PO Performance

    Criteria

    POOR (1)

    (2)

    ACCEPTABLE (3)

    (4)

    EXCELLENT (5)

    Students Action / Remark: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Academic Advisors Action / Remark: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    . .. Signature & Name of Academic Advisor Signature of Student Date

    No: Course Code Course Course Lecturer

    PO PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

    (Please refer to respective Programme Outcome Rubric.)

    Average scale for

    each course

    i ii iii iv v vi vii viii

    UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    PO1 / PO2 / PO3 / PO4 / PO5 / PO6 / PO7 / PO8 /

    PO9 / PO10 / PO11 (Circle where appropriate.

    Use separate sheet for each PO.)

  • Submission to The Engineering Accreditation Council for Accreditation of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering

    (Manufacturing) (Honours), Universiti Teknologi MARA

    TABLE 1 Course to PO Matrix

    Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal COURSE- PO MAPPING Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Manufacturing) (Hons.) - EM241

    Able

    to A

    pply

    kno

    wle

    dge

    of m

    athe

    mat

    ics,

    sci

    ence

    , eng

    inee

    ring

    fund

    amen

    tals

    an

    d an

    eng

    inee

    ring

    spec

    ializ

    atio

    n to

    the

    solu

    tion

    of c

    ompl

    ex e

    ngin

    eerin

    g pr

    oble

    ms;

    Able

    to Id

    entif

    y, fo

    rmul

    ate,

    rese

    arch

    lite

    ratu

    re a

    nd a

    naly

    ze c

    ompl

    ex

    engi

    neer

    ing

    prob

    lem

    s re

    achi

    ng s

    ubst

    antia

    ted

    conc

    lusi

    ons

    usin

    g fir

    st p

    rinci

    ples

    of

    mat

    hem

    atic

    s, n

    atur

    al s

    cien

    ces

    and

    engi

    neer

    ing

    scie

    nces

    ;

    Able

    to D

    esig

    n so

    lutio

    ns fo

    r com

    plex

    eng

    inee

    ring

    prob

    lem

    s an

    d de

    sign

    sy

    stem

    s, c

    ompo

    nent

    s or

    pro

    cess

    es th

    at m

    eet s

    peci

    fied

    need

    s w

    ith a

    ppro

    pria

    te

    cons

    ider

    atio

    n fo

    r pub

    lic h

    ealth

    and

    saf

    ety,

    cul

    tura

    l, so

    ciet

    al, a

    nd e

    nviro

    nmen

    tal

    cons

    ider

    atio

    ns

    Able

    to C

    ondu

    ct in

    vest

    igat

    ion

    into

    com

    plex

    pro

    blem

    s us

    ing

    rese

    arch

    bas

    ed

    know

    ledg

    e an

    d re

    sear

    ch m

    etho

    ds in

    clud

    ing

    desi

    gn o

    f exp

    erim

    ents

    , ana

    lysi

    s an

    d in

    terp

    reta

    tion

    of d

    ata,

    and

    syn

    thes

    is o

    f inf

    orm

    atio

    n to

    pro

    vide

    val

    id

    conc

    lusi

    ons

    Able

    to C

    reat

    e, s

    elec

    t and

    app

    ly a

    ppro

    pria

    te te

    chni

    ques

    , res

    ourc

    es, a

    nd

    mod

    ern

    engi

    neer

    ing

    and

    IT to

    ols,

    incl

    udin

    g pr

    edic

    tion

    and

    mod

    elin

    g, to

    co

    mpl

    ex e

    ngin

    eerin

    g ac

    tiviti

    es, w

    ith a

    n un

    ders

    tand

    ing

    of th

    e lim

    itatio

    ns

    Able

    to A

    pply

    reas

    onin

    g in

    form

    ed b

    y co

    ntex

    tual

    kno

    wle

    dge

    to a

    sses

    s so

    ciet

    al,

    heal

    th, s

    afet

    y, le

    gal a

    nd c

    ultu

    ral i

    ssue

    s an

    d th

    e co

    nseq

    uent

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    ies

    rele

    vant

    to p

    rofe

    ssio

    nal e

    ngin

    eerin

    g pr

    actic

    e.

    Able

    to U

    nder

    stan

    d th

    e im

    pact

    of p

    rofe

    ssio

    nal e

    ngin

    eerin

    g so

    lutio

    ns in

    soc

    ieta

    l an

    d en

    viro

    nmen

    tal c

    onte

    xts

    and

    dem

    onst

    rate

    kno

    wle

    dge

    of a

    nd n

    eed

    for

    sust

    aina

    ble

    deve

    lopm

    ent

    Able

    to A

    pply

    eth

    ical

    prin

    cipl

    es a

    nd c

    omm

    it to

    pro

    fess

    iona

    l eth

    ics

    and

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    ies

    and

    norm

    s of

    eng

    inee

    ring

    prac

    tice.

    Able

    to C

    omm

    unic

    ate

    effe

    ctiv

    ely

    on c

    ompl

    ex e

    ngin

    eerin

    g ac

    tiviti

    es w

    ith th

    e en

    gine

    erin

    g co

    mm

    unity

    and

    with

    soc

    iety

    at l

    arge

    , suc

    h as

    bei

    ng a

    ble

    to

    com

    preh

    end

    and

    writ

    e ef

    fect

    ive

    repo

    rts a

    nd d

    esig

    n do

    cum

    enta

    tion,

    mak

    e ef

    fect

    ive

    pres

    enta

    tions

    , and

    giv

    e an

    d re

    ceiv

    e cl

    ear i

    nstru

    ctio

    ns

    Able

    to F

    unct

    ion

    effe

    ctiv

    ely

    as a

    n in

    divi

    dual

    , and

    as

    a m

    embe

    r or l

    eade

    r in

    dive

    rse

    team

    s an

    d in

    mul

    ti-di

    scip

    linar

    y se

    tting

    s.

    Able

    to R

    ecog

    nize

    the

    need

    for,

    and

    have

    the

    prep

    arat

    ion

    and

    abilit

    y to

    eng

    age

    in in

    depe

    nden

    t and

    life

    -long

    lear

    ning

    in th

    e br

    oade

    st c

    onte

    xt o

    f tec

    hnol

    ogic

    al

    chan

    ge.

    Able

    to D

    emon

    stra

    te k

    now

    ledg

    e an

    d un

    ders

    tand

    ing

    of e

    ngin

    eerin

    g an

    d m

    anag

    emen

    t prin

    cipl

    es a

    nd a

    pply

    thes

    e to

    one

    s o

    wn

    wor

    k (in

    clud

    ing

    as a

    n en

    trepr

    eneu

    r), a

    s a

    mem

    ber a

    nd le

    ader

    in a

    team

    , to

    man

    age

    proj

    ects

    and

    in

    mul

    tidis

    cipl

    inar

    y en

    viro

    nmen

    ts.

    UNIVERSITI COURSES

    Code Course Sem Credit PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

    HBU111 Co-Curriculum I 1 1 HBU121 Co-Curriculum II 2 1 HBU131 Co-Curriculum III 3 1 CTU551 Tamadun Islam dan Tamadun Asia 2 2 CTU553 Hubungan Etnik 3 2 BEL422 Report Writing 4 2

    BEL499 Communication and Interpersonal Skills 3 2

    BAB401 Third Language 1 3 2

  • Submission to The Engineering Accreditation Council for Accreditation of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering

    (Manufacturing) (Honours), Universiti Teknologi MARA

    BAB451 Third Language 2 4 2 BAB501 Third Language 3 5 2 ENT600 Technopreneurship 6 3

    Total 20 0 3 0 1 1 6 6 0 10 10 10 1

    PROGRAM SERVICE COURSES

    Code Course Sem Credit PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

    MAT435 Calculus for Engineers 1 3 CSC430 Computer Programming and Applications 2 3 MAT455 Further Calculus for Engineers 3 3 MAT565 Advanced Differential Equations 4 3 EPE491 Electrical Power and Machines 3 3

    Total 15 4 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

    PROGRAM CORE COURSES

    Code Course Sem Credit PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

    MEC400 Introduction To Engineering and Problem Solving

    1 3

    MEC412 Engineering Statics 1 3 MEC431 Engineering Drawing 1 3 MEM460 Engineering Workshop Practice 1 2 MEC441 Fluid Mechanics I 2 3 MEC451 Thermodynamics 2 3 MEC454 Thermofluids Lab 2 1 MEC481 Materials Science 2 3 MEC411 Mechanics of Materials 3 3 MEC420 Dynamics 3 3 MEC424 Applied Mechanics Lab 4 1 MEC435 Computer-Aided Design 4 3

  • Submission to The Engineering Accreditation Council for Accreditation of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering

    (Manufacturing) (Honours), Universiti Teknologi MARA

    MEC442 Fluid Mechanics II 4 3 MEC531 Mechanical Engineering Design I 5 4 MEC551 Thermal Engineering 5 3 MEC554 Thermalfluids Lab 5 1 MEC521 Vibrations 5 3 MEM560 Manufacturing Processes 5 3 MEM564 Manufacturing Processes Lab 5 1 MEC522 Control Engineering 6 4 MEC532 Mechanical Engineering Design II 6 3 MEC523 Applied Electronics and Microprocessor 6 3 MEM575 Industrial Management 6 3 MEM603 Occupational Safety and Health 7 3 MEC500 Numerical Methods with Applications 6 3 MEC600 Engineers in Society 7 3 MEC601 Final Year Project I 7 2 MEC699 Industrial Training 7 4 MEC602 Final Year Project II 8 4

    Total 81 23 20 7 8 8 4 4 3 15 18 1 4

    PROGRAM ELECTIVES COURSES

    Code Course Sem Credit PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

    MEX6YY Special Topic 1 7 3 MEX6YY Special Topic 2 8 3 MEX6YY Special Topic 3 8 3 MEX6YY Special Topic 4 8 3

    Total 12 3 3 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 TOTAL CREDIT 128

  • Submission to The Engineering Accreditation Council for Accreditation of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering

    (Manufacturing) (Honours), Universiti Teknologi MARA

    PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12

    UNIVERESITY ELECTIVE COURSES 0 3 0 1 1 6 6 0 10 10 10 1 PROGRAM SERVICE COURSES 4 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 PROGRAM COURSES 23 20 7 8 8 4 4 3 15 18 1 4 PROG ELECTIVE COURSES 3 3 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 1 0 TOTAL COURSES FOR EACH PO 30 31 10 14 15 10 11 3 27 30 13 5 % COURSES FOR EACH PO (OVERALL) /49 61.2 63.3 20.4 28.6 30.6 20.4 22.4 6.1 55.1 61.2 26.5 10.2 % COURSES FOR EACH PO (PC +4Es) /33 78.8 69.7 30.3 24.2 27.3 12.1 15.2 9.1 51.5 60.6 6.1 12.1 Nos Credit % TOTAL UEC 11 20 15.6 TOTAL PSC 5 15 11.7 TOTAL PC 29 81 63.3 4 ELECTIVES 4 12 9.4 TOTAL PC + 4 ELECTIVES 33 93 72.7 TOTAL UEC+ PSC+ PC + 4 ELECTIVES 49 128 100