x-ray emission shape/size analysis at lle f. j. marshall, lle · 2016-03-16 · x-ray emission...

27
X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE Outline of talk: Instruments used to image cryogenic target implosion cores: Time integrated: GMXI, KB3 Time resolved: KBFRAMED, SFC3 w/pinhole array Method of determining core size Comparison of sizes from different directions: Time integrated: GMXI, KB3, KBFRAMED(unframed mode) Time resolved: KBFRAMED, SFC3 Direct comparison of core size along common perpendicular lines of sight: NISP Workshop March 2016

Upload: others

Post on 03-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLEF. J. Marshall, LLE

Outline of talk:

• Instruments used to image cryogenic targetimplosion cores:

Time integrated: GMXI, KB3Time resolved: KBFRAMED, SFC3 w/pinhole array

• Method of determining core size

• Comparison of sizes from different directions:Time integrated: GMXI, KB3, KBFRAMED(unframed mode)Time resolved: KBFRAMED, SFC3

• Direct comparison of core size along common perpendicularlines of sight:

NISP Workshop March 2016

Page 2: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 3: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 4: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 5: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 6: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

KBFRAMED has a known response to soft x rays

KBFRAMED (unframed) has the following sensitivity:

f = s(E) * εKB (E) * ∆Ω / M2

where f is the flux density at the image plane in keV/keV/cm2/sand s = surface flux density in keV/keV/cm2/s/sr

εKB = KB microscope efficiency (reflectivity * filter transmission)∆Ω = solid angle of the microscopeM = magnification.

For KBFRAMED:∆Ω = 9 x 10-8 srM = 12.0

The counts seen in a particular image are given by:

C = ⌠ dE * s(E) * εKB(E) * ∆Ω / M2

where εKB is the reflection efficiency times the filter transmission.

Page 7: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

Energy (keV)

Effic

ienc

ywith 1 mil Be filter(6.5 mils Be total)

Ir reflectivity

KBFRAMED (unframed response)

Note: Blast shield = 4 mils Be, vacuum Be window = 1 mil Besecondary debris shield = 0.5 mils Be

(total filtration = 5.5 mils Be + filter at image plane, 6.5 mils Be in example above)

+1 mil Al

+2 mils Al

Page 8: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 9: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

The GMXI has a resolution of ~8 µm at best focus when images are recorded by CID cameras

Backlit 500 mesh Cu gridimage corrected to target plane

Magnification: 13.64 ave14.01 horizontal13.28 verticalverified to better than 1%

300 µm 8 µm

OMEGA shot 80301

Position (microns)

Sign

al (k

ADU

s)

8 um fwhmgaussian

F. J. Marshall and J. A. Oertel, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68 (1), January 1997

Page 10: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

Image-to-image timing is precisely determined from positionand the use of measured cables (±2 ps).

Page 11: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 12: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

(SFC3 PSF ≈ 12 µm)

Page 13: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

PSF smoothed image Super-Gaussian Fit Image-Fit

Inferred fitRo (microns):maximum:exponent:

17.24+/- 0.00 0.196+/- 0.000 2.66+/- 0.00

a/b:phi (deg):background:

200. by 200. micron region psf(fwhm) = 6.0 microns

1.144+/- 0.000 98.1+/- 0.0 0.002+/- 0.000

OMEGA shot 77064: KBF image 7

Lineout indicated by dotted line

Output of aq_gaussfit1.pro

03/04/2016

6.5 mils Be, 2 mils Al

Image, Fit(dots), Inferred(red)

0 50 100 150Position (microns)

-0.050.000.050.100.150.200.25

kAD

Us

R17=21.4±0.3

Page 14: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

PSF smoothed image Super-Gaussian Fit Image-Fit

Inferred fitRo (microns):maximum:exponent:

17.23+/- 0.13 0.948+/- 0.032 2.30+/- 0.17

a/b:phi (deg):background:

200 by 200 micron region psf(fwhm) = 12.0 microns

1.029+/- 0.001 120.0+/- 0.9 0.001+/- 0.008

OMEGA shot 77064: SFC3T5, IMAGE 35

Lineout indicated by dotted line

Output of aq_gaussfit1.pro

05/06/2015

1 mils Be, 1.5 mils Al

Image, Fit(dots), Inferred(red)

0 50 100 150Position (microns)

0.00.20.40.60.81.01.2

inten

sity(

a.u.) R17=22.1±0.3

Page 15: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 16: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 17: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 18: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

y = 1.027x

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0

KB3C

R17

%(c

orr)

GMXIC R17%(corr)

KB3c vs GMXIc image sizes on cryo shots

KB3C vs GMXIC

x = y

Linear (KB3C vs GMXIC)

The cryogenic target implosion cores have been measuredwith two KB microscopes in time integrated mode

The two measurements infer a core size that agree within a fewpercent of each other from quasi-orthogonal views

Page 19: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

Cryogenic target implosion cores have been measured withKBFRAMED, a framed pinhole array, and a time integrated KB

The larger time integrated core sizes place an upper limit on “emission-region-size” evolution of ~ 5 µm

VGMXI

VKB3

VSFC3

x y

z

Page 20: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

, where is the common axis| |

In coordinates of image:

, , arctan , ,| | | |

Flux along common

a bab ab

a b

i i i ab ii i i

i i i ab i

i a bα

×=

×

= = =

v vv vv v

z × v v ×q v pq = pz × v v ×q v q

( )

( ) ( )

line of sight:

' ( ' , ' ) ' , where ' '

Assuming omnidirectional, optically-thin emission ' '

ab

i i i i i ab a b

a a b b

F p f q p dq

F p F p

= = =

=

∫v

v q q

The flux along common perpendicular lines of sightcan be compared exactly by rotation and integration

VGMXI

VKB3

V⊥

x y

z

Page 21: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

KB3 d image

GMXI d image

Rotated to commonperpendicular view

100 µm

OMEGA cryogenic target shot 75010

Rotated images are summed in vertical direction to compare core shape

88.9°

104.5°

p'

p'

VGMXI

VKB3

V⊥

V

Page 22: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

Summations along common perpendicularlines of sight

Nor

mal

ized

sign

al

Distance (microns)

OMEGA cryogenic target shot 75010

GMXI d-image

KB3 d-image

GMXI d

KB3 d

Page 23: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

Summations along common perpendicularlines of sight

Nor

mal

ized

sign

al

Distance (microns)

OMEGA cryogenic target shot 80552

GMXI c imageKBF 5

GMXI c

Flux at image plane (KBF)was ~4000 photons/res elat peak of image from calibrated Biomax response assuming 5 keV

KBFRAMED (unframed)Image 5

Page 24: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLEF. J. Marshall, LLE

The size and shape of the cryogenic target implosion cores arebeing measured by multiple x-ray imaging diagnostics on OMEGA

Simultaneous time-integrated images shown agreement within ~3%on average with large directional deviations on individual shots

Time-resolved images at the peak of the stagnation agree closelyas to the size of the core (within ~5%)

Comparison of images along mutually perpendicular lines-of-sightconfirm that only directional differences affect the measurements

NISP Workshop March 2016

CONCLUSIONS

Page 25: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 26: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used
Page 27: X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE F. J. Marshall, LLE · 2016-03-16 · X-ray emission shape/size analysis at LLE. F. J. Marshall, LLE. Outline of talk: • Instruments used

F. J. Marshall, et al., POP vol.4, 1118 (1998).

withLANLframing camera