wt wp-26 herrmann exaugural reinventing
DESCRIPTION
lecture on the occasion of retiring from University College of Cork, relfecting on challenges for academia todayTRANSCRIPT
William Thompson Working Papers, 26ISSN: 1649-9743i
provided by
Institute for Independent Research
Dr. Peter Herrmann, The Jasnaja Poljana, Aghabullogue, Clonmoyle, Co. CorkPh. +353.(0)87.2303335, Secretariat: +353.(0)86.3454589, e-mail: [email protected], skype: peteresosc URL:
http://www.esosc.eu
for
College of Arts, Celtic Studies and Social Sciences
Applied Social Studieshttp://william-thompson.ucc.ie;
Ph. +353.(0)21.490.3398; FAX: +353.(0)21.4903443
Peter Herrmann: REINVENTING THE WHEEL OR SQUARING THE CIRCLE – SUSTAINABLE SOCIAL QUALITY VS SOCIAL POLICY
2013
Peter Herrmann1
Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy2
1 Dr. phil (Bremen, Germany). Studies in Sociology (Bielefeld, Germany), Economics (Hamburg, Germany), Political
Science (Leipzig, Germany) and Social Policy and Philosophy (Bremen, Germany). Had been teaching at several Third
Level Institutions across the EU; currently correspondent to the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Social
Law (Munich, Germany). He holds position as for instance that of a senior advisor to the European Foundation on Social
Quality (The Hague, Netherlands), member of the Advisory Board of EURISPES – Instituto di Studi Politici, Economici e
Sociali, Rome, member of the Scientific Board and its coordination committee of ATTAC – Association pour la taxation
des transactions financières pour l’aide aux citoyens, Associate Member of the Eurasian Center for Big History and System
Forecasting, Lomonosow Moscow State University, Russia. He is currently adjunct professor at the University of Eastern
Finland (UEF), Department of Social Sciences (Kuopio, Finland). He held various positions as visiting professor and is
currently in this position at the Corvinus University in Budapest (Faculty of Economics, Department of World Economy;
there since 2012 appointed as ass. prof.). He also had been research fellow at National Taiwan University, Taipei; The
Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Australia; Visiting Scholar at Orta Dogu Teknik Üniversitesi (ODTU), Ankara,
Turkey; Visiting Scholar at the Max-Planck-Institute für Sozialrecht und Sozialpolitik, Munich, Germany
He started his work in researching European Social Policy and in particular the role of NGOs. His main interest shifted
over the last years towards developing the Social Quality Approach further, looking in particular into the meaning of
economic questions and questions of law. He linked this with questions on the development of state analysis and the
question of social services. On both topics he published widely.
Member of several editorial and advisory boards; editor of the book series Applied Social Studies – Recent Developments,
International and Comparative Perspectives (New York, USA) and Studies in Comparative Pedagogies and International
Social Work and Social Policy (Bremen, Germany); peer-reviewing for several journals in the social area and book series.2 Presentation on Occasion of Retiring from University College Cork, School of Applied Social Studies
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
2
Abstract:
Social policy arrives frequently at junctures, being a non-discipline, bordering
and combining elements from various other disciplines. The presentation will
look at two major challenges:
(1) Academic work frequently overlooks that division of labour, i.e. the
establishment of subjects in research and teaching is also about
disciplining. But is the notion of Spinoza's time, suggesting that Omne ens
habet aliquod esse proprium – every entity has a singular essence is true?
Who and what is setting the references?
(2) Part of the process of (self-)disciplining is about defining points of
references. The ongoing challenge is not least about balancing politics and
policies. Sustainable Social Quality is an attempt to integrate these
dimensions.
(3) To arrive at the trinity, that we have to look for a definite point of
reference in societal practice not (only) as matter of analysis but also by
way of taking the role of "organic intellectuals" (Gramsci)
It is another attempt - after many predecessors, and competing with other
paradigms. So are we then just reinventing the wheel or squaring the circle?
The presentation will, of course, not provide the answers - but it may be able to
put forward some questions that need attention and demand us as collective to
thoroughly think about.
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
3
Language matters – and it is also important to look at from where language
actually comes – easily seen by Norbert, being asked for a power point
presentation. Well, yes, here it is …
3
In general and for the purpose of this presentation we should not establish too
high expectations: take things as they are said – and be aware of the fact that
they are stated in a very specific socio-historical context. In order to understand
this, the presentation will occasionally make some inspiring detours – hopefully
allowing also enjoying some beauties of life that carry historical messages about
structure and change – be aware: exploring the beauty of history and the
meaning of society takes time, requires patience …
Although we may say that it goes without saying, we are frequently forgetting the
deep meaning of exactly this fact: In any scientific work we are dealing with both,
structure and process.
*****
We may usefully start from Aristotle’s zoon politicon, the human being seen as
social being. This does not simply look at the interaction between human beings
– surely an important factor. There are already difficulties as it is not clear in
which way the politicon has to be interpreted. There is both, the reference to the
state, to politics and to a very general understanding of togetherness, interaction.
3 from xyz
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
4
Importantly it is clear that with all this we are not least acting beings – only our
own action, i.e. societal practice actually defines our very existence. Thus
includes the ability not to act. Now, we may think of Friedrich Schiller who sees
the highest form of existence, as
man only plays when in the full meaning of the word he is a man,
and he is only completely a man when he plays.
(Schiller, letters, XV/9)
Here we surely find a complex understanding dealing with regaining power over
the will not only by way of control, i.e. oppression, but by way of developed
forms of free play.
– What do we commonly think when it comes to these terms: play, freedom …?
Children, unhindered in their naïveté is in may cases likely the first connotation.
And the second connotation may be the artful play of … – for instance the
reasonably uncontested beauty of a harmonious dance.
4
It is the beauty of clarity, order and balance. It seems to be a self-explanatory
approach, allowing us to accept without asking, looking at something that has its
own order, being independent. Probably this is part of our tendency to
perversely celebrate power: the monuments of past and present oppression –
yes, I had been in the German Reichstag not only due to business, and part of the
study trips I did with the students here from Cork had always been the
4 Swan Lake http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Arts/Arts_/Pictures/2009/3/26/1238081417847/Swan-Lake-by-American-
Bal-001.jpg - 27/02/2013
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
5
admiration of some of these ‘monuments’, the last one the most impressive town
hall in Paris.
It is the admiration of something able to stand without support. Supposedly in
sculpturing Michelangelo’s statue David is a very early example for such order:
the first free-standing statue, the young man standing on his own. As such,
standing upright, the statue had been sending a strong – and actually hugely
contested – message.
5
As the Florentine chronicler Luca Landucci noted in his diary,
stones were thrown at the collossal sculpture even if it was being
transported from the Office of Works, so that a guard had to be
mounted to protect it.
Importantly
The stone-throwing youth’s came from pro-Medici families for
whom the prospect of a figure with republican connotations being
installed in front of the seat of the Florentine government must
have been thorougly unpalatable.
5 http://www.arte.it/foto/orig/6e/2897-David_Miguel_Angel.jpg - 27/02/2013
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
6
(Zoellner, Frank/Thoenes, Christoph, 2007: Michelangelo. 1475-
1564. Life and Work; Koeln:Taschen, 2007/2010: 46)
Giorgio Vasari chronicled in this context a little story that has some metaphorical
meaning.
It happened at this time that Piero Soderini, having seen it (the
statue, P.H.) in place, was well pleased with it, but said to
Michelangelo, at a moment when he was retouching it in certain
parts, that it seemed to him that the nose of the figure was too
thick. Michelangelo noticed that the Gonfalonier was beneath the
Giant, and that his point of view prevented him from seeing it
properly; but in order to satisfy him he climbed upon the staging,
which was against the shoulders, and quickly took up a chisel in
his left hand, with a little of the marble-dust that lay upon the
planks of the staging, and then, beginning to strike lightly with the
chisel, let fall the dust little by little, nor changed the nose a whit
from the what it was before. Then, looking down at the
Gonfalonier, who stood watching him, he said, ‘Look at it now.’ ‘I
like it better,’ said the Gonfalonier, ‘you have given it life.’ And so
Michelangelo came down, laughing to himself at having satisfied
that lord, for he had compassion on those, who, in order to appear
full of knowledge, talk about things of which they know nothing.
(Vasari, Giorgio, 1568: Lives of Painters, sculptors and architects.
Vol 2: translated by Gaston du C. de Vere. With an Introduction
and Notes by David Ekserdjian; New York et altera: Alfred Knopf,
1996: 654 f.)
From here it takes some steps to the question of the disciplining effects of which
I promised to talk. But with a little bit of common sense, putting away the
cultural bias it will actually be soon clear.
* One of the fundamental demands put forward in science is concerned with the
discovery of structures that are characterising any given reality.
Methodologically this is a complex process – and speaking of methods it seems
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
7
to be a rather simple matter of the famous bean counting. And with the latter
we usually overlook that even the counting of beans isn’t as simple and
without presumptions as we like to see it. On the contrary – and I quote Joe
Finnerty
one of the most effective applications of indicators is not merely to
describe but also to analyse, thereby sometimes changing the
definition of a problem.
(Finnerty, Joseph, 2005: Social Indicators: Pitfalls ad Promise; in:
Herrmann, Peter (ed.): Utopia between Corrupted Public
Responsibility and Contested Modernisation. Globalisation and
Social Responsibility; New York: Nova Science Publ.; 61-76; here:
69)
* With this we arrive at the fact that paradoxically a second and simultaneous
fundamental rule of science is construction.
* The story of David and Michelangelo’s presentation captures both, the
determination of structure based on some form of de-construction and the
construction according to the interest that is standing behind research:
David stands in front of his colossal enemy, finding the small point of his
vulnerability: the gap through which he could throw the fatal stone
Michelangelo interpreted this: emphasising David’s beauty, virginity and
power: a firm independence. However, this translates into some inability to
move. It is correct to speak of structure; and it is equally correct to say that
this structure follows in some way a rule that is inherent in the person of
the David – later in history this is fully spelled out, the early modernity
suggesting
Omne ens habet aliquod esse proprium (every entity has a
singular essence)
(Johannes Duns Scotus, Opera Omina [1266 à Duns 1308] quoted
in: Suarez-Nani, Tiziana: Pietro Pomponazzi et Jenas Duns Scot
critiques de Thomas d'Aquin; in: Biard, Joel/Gontier, Thierry
(dir.): Pietro Pomponazzi entre traditions et innovations;
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
8
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: B.R. Gruener Publishing, 2009: 29-67;
here: 33)
And finally, the supposedly neutral viewer – the Gonfalonier – is getting lost
in all of this: being deceived by falling dust and taking it for change. It is the
lack of ability to understand the rigidity caused by looking at isolated ‘facts’.
We may take it as metaphor, seeing it as confirmation of Michael Hardt’s
and Antonio Negri’s stance:
The triple imperative of the Empire is incorporate, differentiate,
manage.
(Hardt, Michael/Negri, Antonio, 2000: Empire; Cambridge,
Mass./London,Engl.: Harvadd University Presee: 201)
Now it is not a major step anymore – David can be seen as anticipated
manifestation of modern understanding of Anglo-American social policy as
academic discipline: it is a discipline that defines itself by de-contextualising
the subject matter; it is a discipline that looks at social administration of the
good and the evil, the deserving and the non-deserving … .
* Of course, it is a long and winded road …, at the end of which structuralism
evolves. We may speak of Davidian social science and can easily see the fatal
development: ‘methodological individualism’. Social processes are dissolved,
deconstructed. And from here this social science – always being applied social
science – supports in real history the emergence of something new, namely the
modern individual, reflecting only him or herself. As we know from Descartes,
it is the individual that comes only with this reflection to its existence. It is this
reification of Narcissus that leads then Adam Smith to look for an invisible
hand – power and security standing outside, being seen as independent from
the dynamic processes.
* However, as much as we are dealing with ideal figures: imagined independent
structures, we should not forget that these constructions are not based on free
will. They are reflecting societal and eco-technical circumstances as they are
given in the social structures: the productive forces and the mode of
production – the pedestal on which Davidian thinking stands.
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
9
So much on David and the meaning for social science: established had been a
figure that expressed
compassion on those, who, in order to appear full of knowledge,
talk about things of which they know nothing.
The Gonfalonier, Michelangelo is facing is manifest in today’s office worker:
senior officials and the administrator depending on their instructions, immersed
in seemingly neutral rules; rules themselves presenting themselves as technical
whereas their essence is substantially about socio-political power: law and
administration as presented by Max Weber, speaking of
[s]pecialists without spirit, sensualists without heart; this nullity
imagines that it has attained a level of civilization never before
achieved.
(Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.
1905,Chapter V, Asceticism and the Spirit of
Capitalismhttp://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/weber/pr
otestant-ethic/ch05.htm)
Karl Marx refers to this in the famous statement from the 18th Brumaire.
Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they
please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by
themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given
and transmitted from the past.
(Marx, Karl, 1852: The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte; in: Karl
Marx/Frederick Engels: Collected Works; Colume 11: Marx and
Engels: 1851-53; London: Lawrence&Wishart, 1979: 99-197; here:
103)
The dream of freedom emerges turns into its opposite
The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on
the brain of the living.
(Marx, Karl, 1852: The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte; in: Karl
Marx/Frederick Engels: Collected Works; Colume 11: Marx and
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
10
Engels: 1851-53; London: Lawrence&Wishart, 1979: 99-197; here:
103)
And exactly this is Michelangelo’s paradox as much as it is the frequently re-
emerging paradox of history: the dwarf, the powerless gaining power and
establishing him/herself as giant. I am not talking about the tyrants, emerging for
usually brief periods in history. I am talking about the tyrannical systems for
which they are only mere backers.
Coming back then to Marx contending that
[m]en make their own history
we have to recognise that this claim stands fundamentally in opposition to
structuralism – be it as closed and disciplining scientific methodology or be it as
‘way of life’. It stands against the rigidity of oppression, against the abduction
and rape of the freedom of thought.
The most impressive statue I ever came across is Bernini’s Rato di Proserpina.
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
11
6
For me it is an amazing, most powerful expression in sculpturing or even in art
expressing the victory of process over structure. Sure, the title still focuses on the
old hegemony: abduction and rape. Nevertheless, it also suggests a different
focus. At the centre we find Prosperpina: fighting, resisting. Her rejection and
aversion is expressing a new beauty: the beauty of action, the beauty of a
revolutionary process.
According to Simon Schama in a BBC-feature, this statue, Bernini’s great work, is
the first piece in the history of art that dynamises sculpturing in a serious way
(Schama: passim). Behind this we find in very broad terms two inventions:
* the invention of the now ‘civilised individual’, distanced from nature and
distanced from the social
* and the invention of the economic sphere as distinct area – a ‘de-socialised
sphere of social action’, organised by stratified-functional segmentation.7
Of course, this meant not least that the process had been a matter of dialectical
development: clearly positioning structures as independent of each other, the
escape of the individual from the oppression of the political power had been
simultaneously the establishment of new structures. In methodological terms it
is what Karl Marx develops, contending that
proletarian revolutions, like those of the nineteenth century,
constantly criticise themselves constantly, interrupt themselves
continually in their own course, come back to the apparently
accomplished in order to begin afresh, deride with unmerciful
thoroughness the inadequacies, weaknesses and paltrinesses of
their first attempts …
(Marx, Karl, 1852: The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte; in: Karl
Marx/Frederick Engels: Collected Works; Colume 11: Marx and
6 http://www.arte.it/foto/orig/fe/255-Bernini_Proserpina.jpg - 27/02/20137 We can leave the further consideration aside, including the fact that actually globalisation is to a large extent a kind of
replication of stratificatory differentiation; see in this context already Herrmann,Peter, 1994: Die Organisation. Eine
Analyse der modernen Gesellschaft; Rheinfelden/Berlin: Schäuble
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
12
Engels: 1851-53; London: Lawrence&Wishart, 1979: 99-197; here:
106)
But importantly we find this as a process of a permanent restructuration and
reconstruction – this is only possible by way of fundamentally accepting the
‘blurring of boarders’. With this we arrive at a point not only of questioning given
border lines, but also as matter of establishing new points of reference.
Processes of change are of course again linked to real processes – at stake is not
an intellectual exercise of ‘reordering the world’. Instead we are dealing again
with the fact that processes and structures alike are reflecting societal and social
structures: the productive forces and the mode of production. Proserpina is, in
this interpretation, not just expressing her rejection but she is also expressing
part of another world, now being possible. And now also being necessary as
matter of developing independence.
The actual challenge for (social) science is to find a way that allows the
construction of an ongoing structured processualistion – in actual fact a rather
harsh process of open battles, reminding me of Pablo Picasso’s masterpiece.
8
Such quest may replace at least to some extent the dominant discussion of social
science that juxtaposes function and structure. Critical realism – for instance
being brought forward by Roy Baskar and Margaret Archer – can be an
important inspiration for this process. The social quality approach makes
importantly reference to this work. At the same time it emerges from the
analysis of concrete policy processes, in particular in the area of EUrope – and
8 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/academic/class/15463-f08/www/proj2/www/vramakri/images/artwork/
PicassoGuernica.jpg - 10/9/09 8:35 AM
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
13
looking back to art we come at this stage really back to dance – earlier reference
had been made already earlier to its beauty.
9
At the core this new approach in discussing social policy is about a more radical
version of dance, not limited top the disciplined form of an academic subject.
Even as somebody who had been not only teaching social policy but who had
been working for a quite a while in the lobbying industry for changes of social
policy I dare to say that the social quality approach is about rejecting the concept
of social policy at least in its mainstream understanding. This is not primarily
about a rejection by way of criticising certain measures or policy programs. Nor
is it about a rejection due to social policy being annexed to other areas of policy
making, in particular economics, captured as social investment, the productive
role of social policy, the increasing subordination under managerial, legal and
financial requirements and regulations. At the core of the critique stands
something else: the conceptual framework that is based in two fundamental
flaws – with this I come back to matters that had been mentioned already on
more general terms.
1)It is about the definition of social policy as something that is rooted in
processes and structures that are seemingly standing outside of society.
Although social policy is surely seen as something that deals with issued that
‘emerge from society’, social policy itself is considered to have somewhat
9 https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/541505_552791444755457_20375838_n.jpg - 28/02/2013
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
14
different roots: it is about intervention, activities ‘on behalf’ or ‘in the interest’
of certain groups, pursuing certain moral ideas and … – and predominantly at
the end society comes into play and social policy strives for a better society.
– In short, the social is by and large something imagined, not something real. It
is a ‘distinct state’ in some ways similar to Benedict Anderson’s Imagined
Communities.
To put it on its feet, we would need a clear and explicit understanding of
what the social actually is – the proposal by the social quality approach is to
understand it as
outcome of the interaction between people (constituted as actors)
and their constructed and natural environment. Its subject matter
refers to people’s interrelated productive and reproductive
relationships. In other words, the constitutive interdependency
between processes of self-realisation and processes governing the
formation of collective identities is a condition for the social and
its progress or decline.
(van der Maesen, Laurent J.G./Walker, Alan, 2012: Social Quality
and Sustainability; in: van der Maesen, Laurent J.G./Walker, Alan
(Eds.): Social quality: From Theory to indicators; Basingstoke:
Macmillan: 250-274: 260)
Furthermore, the real ground has to be seen in the production and
reproduction of daily lives. David Harvey asserts that
[a]t Marx’s conception of the world lies the notion of an
appropriation of nature by human beings in order to satisfy their
wants and needs.
(Harvey, David, 2006: Limits to Capital; London/Brooklyn, Verso
5)
This brings us immediately to the point Marx himself emphasises. Point of
departure is a simple relationality:
[i]ndividuals producing in a society
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
15
(Marx, Karl: Introduction (to the Economic Manuscripts of 1857-
1858 [First Version of Capital]); in: Karl Marx. Frederick Engels.
Collected Works; volume 28: Karl Marx: 1857-61; London:
Lawrence & Wishart, 1986: 17-48; here: 17)
And he ascertains:
The further back we go in history, the more does the individual,
and accordingly also the producing individual, appear to be
dependent and belonging to a larger whole. At first, he is still in a
quite natural manner part of the family, and of the family
expanded into the tribe; later he is part of a community, of one of
the different forms of community which arise from the conflict and
the merging of tribes.
(ibid.: 18)
Now it is important to emphasise that
[a]ll production is appropriation of nature by the individual
within and by means of a definite form of society. In this sense it is
a tautology to say that property (appropriation) is a condition of
production.
(ibid.: 25)
However, social policy in its mainstream thinking – including approaches
claiming radical changes – are lacking a proper reference in this respect.
Instead, arguments are brought forward from idealist perspectives. A
confirmation is that social policy, at least in its mainstream and especially in its
Anglo-American perspective, does look at the exclusion and oppression of the
working class – but it hardly recognises that it had been the working class and
the relevant movements that led to what we see as social policy today.
2)The other reason for rejecting mainstream views on social policy is a variation
of the first: although the dominance of economic interests is frequently
highlighted and criticised – and although it is even recognised as matter of
power relationships – the concept of economy is de-socialised. This could be
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
16
further elaborated; and it could also be elaborated by way of extending the
analytical alienation by showing a similar process of de-socialisation in
political thinking. In the same way in which Alfred Marshall deprived political
economy from the political dimension it can be said that Hobbes (to name just
one) the state from the political. The Leviathan is an anonymous institution,
bar of a political dimension, reduced on its instrumental and thus technical
character of controlling individuals. – And paradoxically we find in both cases
the emergence of superpowers that exist as a kind of cloud-castle.
Society is dissolved into three spheres: market, state and communities – and
politicians as well as academics fit easily into the role of secular priests,
celebrating the economy as father, confirming the state in the role of the
obedient son, and hoping for the community and family as emerging holy
spirit.
Of course, law plays a role too – presenting itself as a kind of Holy Scripture: a
skeleton, keeping things together by way of a seemingly neutral, formal
framework – claiming universalism, pertaining particularistic class interests.
On the one hand
[a]n understanding of law’s nature is hard to attain because, on
the face of things, law seems to possess characteristics that cannot
be combined within a single entity: law is an established social
institution, but also a guiding ideal for such institutions; an
apparatus of organized force, but also the antithesis of force; a
product of authority, but also the source of any such authority. It
is in this quality that has some theorists to conclude that
traditional ideas of law embody a belief in the ‘incarnation’ of the
ideal within the realm of the actual, or a belief that law is
‘brooding omnipresence in the sky’.
(Simmonds, Nigel, 2007: Law as a Moral Idea; Oxford: Oxford
University Press: 21)
On the other hand
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
17
[m]en and women create their moral identities and values as by-
product of interaction and mutual acknowledgement, just as they
create culture, language and the structures of thought. The
relationships in which we associate together can embody values
that structure our choices and decisions.
(ibid.: 7)
And in a society in which power is not distributed equally, the meaning is
clear: it is about the moral identities and values of the ruling classes.
3)And to produce then myself such trinity, I come to the next point of rejecting
the stance of mainstream social policy: the externalisation of nature – actually
we are still dealing with more or less a variation or even the accumulation of
the first point, namely the dissociation and idealisation of individual action.
From here anthropocentrism is nearly unavoidable
Leaving detailed discussion aside, we find human beings loosing the ability to
act – or more precise: they are able to act but there is no space left for
developing practice.
For social policy it means that it is fundamentally characterised by especially two
flaws:
) α It is highly individualistic, even to such an extent that so-called social rights
are only conceptualised as rights of individuals;
β) furthermore social policy is systematically limited by being detached from the
socio-ecological causal and contextual foundation, i.e. the (re-)productive
existence.
Consequently – and wrongly – social policy as theory and practice – avoids
economy (and economics) like the plague. The celebration of noble ambitions,
the striving for values that are proclaimed as universal is not simply a quirk of
academic thinking – it is in actual fact a dangerous des-empowerment.
– It may be worth a nota bene that it is also undermining academic work: values
are stated, remain unquestionable and opposing them is similar to opposing god.
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
18
A new Alighieri may tell us if Benedict has to go through similar pain, as we know
from Pope St. Celestine V, left to ‘gran rifiuto’ – the great refusal (see Alighieri,
Dante, 1308-21: La Divina Commedia. Inferno; illustrata da Gustavo Doré, con
commenti di Eugenio Camerini; Roma: Fratelli Spada Editori, without date: 36).
And furthermore somebody else may show us how this kind of academic
dislocation will be end in vein – if we won’t see it already with our own eyes.
I do not want to delve into details of social quality as alternative approach.
Shortly, however, one point. I had been asked last week during a debate in Rome
as seemingly question: Why don’t you call it socialism?
* The initial answer had been straightforward: Personally I call it a socialist
strategy.
* Nevertheless, there is a more complex answer: we have to look for ways to
adapt socialism and the search for socialist policies to the changed conditions.
I.e. we have to find sound answers to the questions of the development of the
productive forces, the meaning of such development also in a global, not only a
national or regional perspective. Only from here we can understand the
meaning of these changes for needs and also for governance. Though this
surely means claiming socialist orientation it goes also further. It is a matter of
analysing contemporary conditions, it is a matter of social practice in a
conscious way. Taking the Marxist tradition, it means to use a permanently
critical approach.
Critique is the practice of exposing the social basis underlying an
argument. Marxist critique is generally immanent critique, that is,
critique springing from inside. …
… critique implicitly recognises that the argument it opposes is
right, but right in the context of a specific form of social practice
which may not be declared.
(Marxists Internet Archive: Encyclopedia. Critique;
http://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/c/r.htm#critique -
25/02/2013 15:56)
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
19
– Another nota bene: It is exactly this approach that is applied in some work by
the Centro de Investigaciones de Política Internatioal (CIPI) in Cuba in which I
am involved. It is also something that has important repercussions in countries
like Bolivia, Venezuela etc. I make this remark as it highlights that we can
expect in particular from peripheral countries and regions inspiring
theoretical challenges in this context.
Furthermore, the approach of Social Quality Policies instead of social policy is
also not simply socialist as it is an approach that still ask for small measures,
traditional policies and reforms that may be departure for further and more
radical developments.
* But having said this, at the end of the day it is a socialist approach to the extent
to which it focuses on the social as complex structure of power-based
interactions. Here we can briefly look at Antonio Gramsci’s discussion of
hegemony and the role of the organic intellectual. Important is to recognise
first of all that the core of Gramsci’s work is concerned with the structural
conflict in society and the need for addressing it as question of clashing class
interests – for those who don’t like the term: just refer to fundamental and
antagonist conflicts between different interests. Second, Antonio Gramsci
speaks of different forms of power – much later Michel Foucault comes up with
this as well, transposing it from the Gramscian view on class struggles into a
more generic context of different forms of power imbalances on the one side,
power struggles on the other side – culminating in the view on the indivisible
relationship between power and knowledge. The important point is that for
Gramsci power is only real when it is intermingled with knowledge – deep
knowledge leading to organic power reflected in and by the organic
intellectuals. Briefly quoting the Quaderni
The criterion on which we should base our analysis is this: that the
supremacy of a social group manifests itself in two ways, as
‘domination’ and as ‘intellectual and moral leadership’. A societal
group is dominant over opposing groups which it tends to
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
20
‘liquidate’ or which it even aims to subdue by armed force and it is
leading the allied groups and immediate allies.10
With this I am coming to the end by highlighting four points that are in my
opinion central for the development for taking responsibility in teaching
sustainable social quality.
First, I said in the beginning language matters. It does so in a twofold way: it is
about clarity of language and at the very same time about use of language to
substantially engage with what is going on around us. Engagement may be about
going with the stream of beauty; and it may also require taking up fundamental
challenges of disputes.
Second, it is also about the clarity of analysis: only posing an exact question will
allow us to find exactly the causalities – and of course the casualities of wrong
politics and policies. This is conditio sine qua non for finding therapies: answers
to the burning questions.
Third, it requires looking at the realities – not as they appear but as they are. If
we then say social policy – to use this term, though not the concept – is
predominantly about Social Justice (Equity), Solidarity, Equal Valuation, Human
Dignity (the four normative factors elaborated by the Social Quality Theory) and
if we see that these values are decomposing, it is because the reality that had
been behind them is decomposing. And without falling into relativism, we should
not forget that our understanding of Social Justice (Equity), Solidarity, Equal
Valuation, Human Dignity is always a historical one. Without this recognition –
and without taking firm responsibility for a clear analysis and open dispute, we
arrive indeed at reinventing the wheel or squaring the circle.
10 Il criterio su cui occorre fondare il proprio esame è questo: che la supremazia di un gruppo sociale si manifesta in due
modi, come ‘domino’ e come ‘direzione intellettuale e morale’. Un gruppo sociale è dominante dei gruppi avversari che
tende a ‘liquidare’ o a sottomettere anche con la forza armata ed è dirigente dei gruppi affini e alleati.
Gramsci, Antonio, 1934-35: Quaderni del Carcere. Vol 3: Quaderni 12-29; Edizione Critica dell’Istituto Gramsci. A Cura
di Valentino Gerratana; Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore, 1977: 2010
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
21
11
– Of course fourth: Have look, the little boy, stepping out.
If you ant, this kind of enlightenment is then leading to paradise – referring to
another time to Dante
Like sudden lightning scattering the spirits
of sight so that the eye is then too weak
to act on other things it would perceive,
such was the living light encircling me,
leaving me so enveloped by its veil
of radiance that I could see no thing.
The Love that calms this heaven always welcomes
into Itself with such a salutation,
to make the candle ready for its flame.12
11 "Seven Ages of Man" William Mulready, 1838 –
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Seven_ages_of_man.jpg. 27/02/201312 Dante Alighieri: Paradiso, Canto XXX, lines 46–54, Mandelbaum translation.
http://www.worldofdante.org/comedy/dante/paradise.xml/3.30 – 27/02/2013
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
22
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
23
Herrmann: Reinventing the Wheel or Squaring the Circle – Sustainable Social Quality vs. Social Policy
24
i The William-Thompson-Working-Paper-Series is edited by the European Social Organisational and Science Consultancy for University of Cork, Department of Applied Social Studies and meant to offer a space for publications of occasional documents. One aim amongst others is to offer a space for publication of work by colleagues of the Department of Applied Social Studies at University of Cork.The work is edited and supervised for publication by Peter Herrmann, ESOSC.The papers will only be published as PDF- or word-file on the website http://william-thompson.ucc.ie.Requests for publication can be sent to ESOSC at herrmann[at]esosc.eu and will be accepted for publication after collective assessment.The copyright is still with the authors so that the documents are free to further publication.