wound assessment and documentation
DESCRIPTION
Wound Assessment and DocumentationTRANSCRIPT
22/1/2013
1
HK ENTERSTOMALTHERAPIST ASSOCIATION
CONTEMPORARY WOUND COURSE 2013
WOUND ASSESSMENT & DOCUMENTATION
APN Lam Ming ChuNTEC FM & GOPC
26th Jan 2013
Wound care management
•Not only treat the wound, treat
the patient as a whole.
Phases of Wound Healing
� The entire wound healing process is a complex series of events that begins at the moment of injury and can
continue for months to years.
� Usually follow well-defined process
• Inflammation (3 - 4 days)
• Proliferation (2 days – 3 weeks)
• Remodeling (3 weeks to 1 year)
Factors that impede healing
�Systemic factor
�Systemic diseases(e.g. diabetic, cardiac, renal and
respiratory)
�Insufficient oxygen & perfusion
�Malnutrition
�Medication (corticosteroids, chemotherapy,
immunosuppressant)
�Age
�Local factors:
�Infection
�Foreign body
�Pressure
Wound assessment
• Purpose
• Examine the severity of the wound
• Determine the status of wound healing
• Establish a baseline for the wound
• Assess and plan the wound management
• Facilitate the continuity of care
General Assessment
�Age / sex
�Physical including: level of mobility, degree of dependence, nutritional status, the presence or absence of concurrent illness, medication, treatment
(RT / chemotherapy)
�Social background: martial stage, family support,
financial support
�Education level: illiterate / primary/ secondary / tertiary
�Personal habit: Smoking, drinking, soft drug abuser
22/1/2013
2
General Assessment
�Systemic disease processes / medication / treatment that adversely affect metabolism, perfusion and are
likely to delay wound healing.
�Psychological status.
�Healing is dependent on the delivery of adequate supplies of nutrients and oxygen to the injured area
for cell metabolism and effective waste product removal.
�Investigation: e.g. blood test / ABI
General Assessment
• Skin assessment
• All patients require a routine and systemic skin
assessment, which includes daily evaluation of the integrity, temperature, texture and presence of lesion on
the skin.
Wound Assessment
• Etiology / type of skin damage
• Duration of wound
• Wound condition
Wound Classification System
• Classification by depth of tissue injury
• Classification of Burn Depth
• Pressure ulcer staging system (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel)
• Wagner staging for grading severity of dysvascular ulcer
Classification of tissue injuryThickness of skin
loss
Definition Clinical example /
healing process
Superficial wound epidermis Sunburn, stage 1 pressure
sore / heal by inflammation
Partial-thickness skin loss Extends through the epidermis
but not through the dermis
Skin tear, abrasion, tape
damage, blister / heal by
epithelialization
Full-thickness skin loss Epidermis, dermis and
subcutaneous fat and deeper
structure
Donor sites, venous ulcer,
surgical wound / heal by
granulation tissue formation
and contraction
Subcutaneous tissue
wound
Extend into or beyond
subcutaneous
Surgical wound, arterial
wound / heal by granulation
tissue formational and
contraction
Classification Burn Depth
Thickness of skin
involved
Definition Clinical example
Superficial
(1st degree burn)
epidermis Sunburn
Partial-thickness
(2nd degree burn)- i) Superficial- ii) Deep
i) Involve epidermis
and upper layers of dermis
ii) Destruction of
epidermis and most of dermis
i) Blister
ii) Blister but most appear slightly moist to dry and are dark
red to pale in color
Full-thickness
(3rd degree burn)
Destroy all layer of the
skin
Dry and leathery and
firm
22/1/2013
3
Pressure ulcer staging system (NPUAP 2007)
Suspected deep tissues injury Purple or maroon localized area of discolor
intact skin or blood. Filled-blister due to
damage of underlying soft tissue from
pressure and or shear.
Stage Ⅰ Non-blanchable redness of intact skin
over bony prominence
Stage Ⅱ Partial thickness loss of dermis
presenting s a shallow open ulcer with red pink wound bed, without slough
Pressure sore – Staging system
StageⅢ Subcutaneous tissue / fat exposed (slough
/ undermining / tunneling but not obscure
the depth of tissue loss)
StageⅣ Full thickness tissue loss with exposed
bone / tendon / muscle / fascia
Unstageable Full thickness skin loss, the base is
cover by slough / eschar
DM foot ulcer – Wagner grading system
Grade 0 Intact skin, may have body deformity.
Grade 1 Superficial skin loss, not involving subcutaneous
tissue.
Grade 2 Full thickness skin loss, involving subcutaneous
tissue, may expose bone, tendon and joint.
Grade 3 Presence of deep ulcer with abscess, osteomyelitis
or joint abscess.
Grade 4 Gangrene localized to the forefoot or heel.
Grade 5 Extensive gangrene
Wound Assessment
�Wound Type
�Site
�Size
�Wound bed (tissue status)
�Exudate
�Periwound skin
�Odor
�Pain
Wound Type
�Wound type
�Arterial ulcer
�Burn / scald
�Cancerous
�Diabetic foot ulcer (Neuropathic)
�Skin tear
�Surgical
�Pressure ulcer
�Traumatic
�Venous leg ulcer
�Fistula
22/1/2013
4
Wound location
• Description: head, face, chest, abdominal, sacral, lower limbs, upper limbs
• Body chart
Wound Size
�Two-dimensional measurement techniques
�Wound photography
�Wound tracings
�Linear measurement – paper or plastic ruler (does not acknowledge wound depth)
Wound SizeThree –dimensional measurement
• Length x Width x Depth
• Length = from head to toe
• Width = cross section
• Depth = deepest
w
L
Undermining
Pt’s head
Pt’s toes
DHead
4.5x4.2 x 1 cm and
undermining4cm deepest at 5 o’clock
Tissue Status
�Classification of tissue injury
�Pressure Ulcer Staging system (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel 2007)
�Wagner grading system for Diabetic foot ulcer
�Wound base tissue
Wound Base Tissue
Wound base Description Color %
Granulating tissue - Inflammation /
proliferative phase- Pale pink to beefy red
25%
50%75%100%
Slough - Non-viable tissue,
yellowish- Loose / hard
Necrotic tissue - Dead tissue
- Dry eschar
Exudate
• Color & texture:
• serous / haemoserous / purulent (pus) /greenish
• abnormal drainage e.g. bile, urine, fecal matter, ascites
etc.
22/1/2013
5
Exudate�Amount depend on wound status and dressing used:
Description Amount
Minimal 5 ml / 24hrs(inner dressing soaked through < 2 cm)
Moderate 5 – 10 ml ml/24hrs (inner dressing soaked through > 2 cm not to outer dressing)
Excessive >10 ml / 24hrs(inner dressing soaked through >2 cm and
also to outer dressing)
Periwound skin
Intact
Erythema
Maceration
Periwound skin
Edema
Hyperpigmentation
Scaling
Cellulites
Odor
• Foul smell e.g. infected wound / fungated wound
• Some occlusive dressing may have a smell on removal & disappear when dressing discard
Pain
• Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
• Descriptive pain intensity scale
No pain Mild pain moderate pain Severe Pain
Wound documentation
22/1/2013
6
Documentation
�Past history / allergy history:
�Social background:
�Occupation:
�Education level:
�Smoker / non-smoker / drinker / non-drinker
�ADL: dependent / partial dependent / dependent
�Mobility: walked unaided / with stick/ frame/ one assistance
�Wound occurred:
�Wound type : Surgical / Burn & scald / Skin tear / Traumatic
/ Leg ulcer / Pressure sore / Cancerous / Other: Dog
bite
�Investigation: e.g. blood test, ABI
Documentation
�Wound condition
�Site:
�Size : (L) x (W) x (D) cm
�Exudate : minimal / moderate / excessive
�Wound bed : pink / red / yellow / black (%)
�Periwound skin : intact / maceration / erythema /
hyperpigmentation / hypo pigmentation / oedema / scaling
/ cellulites
�Odor : nil / mild / offense
�Pain (VAS) :
Treatment
�Cleansing lotion : NS / Hibitane / Betadine
�Primary dressing : Medipore / Jelonet / melolin/ Mesalt/ Hydrocolloid / Foam / Alginate
�Secondary dressing : gauze / combine
�Outer dressing : bandage / surgifix
�Frequency of dressing : QD / Alt day / Q 2-3 days / Q 3-4 days / Q 1W
Treatment
�Other:
�Wound care
�Diet advices : high protein / vit C / low purine / low
salt / fluid restriction, DM diet with even CHO distribution
�Skin care : apply moisturizer / emollient daily
�Minimize edema by elevating the legs / put on
tubigrip
�Improve venous return by putting on pressure garment / calf cuff exercise
Documentation
�Past history / allergy history:
�DM, HT, End stage renal failure on HD three days/ week
�No allergy history
�Social background : lived with wife with good family support
�Financial support : Pension self
�Occupation : retired GS
�Education level : F.3
�Non-somker / non-drinker
�ADL: independent
�Mobility: walk unaided
�Investigation: HbA1c 8% on 31/12/12, afrebrile
Documentation
�Wound occurred :scald by hot pack few days ago and treated by A/B
�Wound type : scald
�Site: left heel
�Size : 7x5.3cm
�Exudate : moderate
�Wound bed : 100% necrotic
�Periwound skin : maceration and erythema and edema
�Odor : mild
�Pain (VAS) : 5, treatment: oral analgesic
22/1/2013
7
Treatment
�Cleansing lotion: NS
�Primary dressing: Bactigras (antimicrobial agent)
�Secondary dressing : gauze
�Outer dressing: bandage
�Frequency of dressing : QD
�Other:
�Wound condition and care plan explained, Mr. X and his wife
showed understand
�Elevated the heel by pillow and avoid pressure
�Nutrition: DM diet with even CHO distribution
�Skin care educated
Follow up documentation
�Push Tool 3.0
�Other wound assessment form
�puBWAT
Reference� Baranoski, S & Ayrllo, EA (2008). Wound Care Essentials Practice Principles 2nd ed., Lippincott,
U.S.A.
� Barnard, AR & Allison, K (2009). The classification and principles of management of wounds in
trauma. Trauma. 11: 163-176
� Benhow, M (2007). Patient assessment and wounds. Journal of Community Nursing. Sutton,
Vol. 21, lss. 7, p.18.20.22 (3 pp.)
� Murphy F (2006). Assessment and management of patients with surgical cavity wounds.
Nursing Standard. Vol 20, lss. 45, p57-8, 60, 62.
� Push Tool Version 3.0 : 9/15/98, National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.
� Saunders, K. & Rowley, J. (2006). Implementing a wound assessment and management system. Australia Nursing Journal : May, 13, 10: 31-33
� Sussman. C & Jensen, B.B., (2007). Wound Care – A Collaborative Practice Manual for Health Professional , 3rd ed., Chap 1 – 5, Lippincott, U.S.A.
� White R (2008) Delayed wound healing: in whom, what, when and why?
Primary Health Care, 18, 2, 40-46.
� Wiebelhaus, P. & Hansen, SL. (2001). Nursing management: July; 32, 7, 31-35.