LI-z- M A - /iv

The World Bank

FOR OFFIClAL USE ONLY

Repmo No. P-6239-IN

MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE

PRESIDENT OF THE

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION

TO THE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

ON A

PROPOSED CREDIT

IN THE AMOUNT EQUIVALENT TO SDR 33.8 MILLION

TO INDIA

FOR A

FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT

FEBRUARY 1, 1994

MICROGRAPHICS

Report No: P- 6239 INType: MOP

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used bv recipients only in the performance oftheir official duties. Its cor.ents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

Currency Unit = Rupee

US$1.00 = Rs. 30

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

The metric system is used throughout the report

FISCAL YEAR

GOI: April 1 - March 31

ABBREVIATIONS

GHNP Great Himalayan National ParkGNP Gross National ProductGOHP Government of Hiiachal PradeshGOTN Government of Tamil NaduKMTR Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger ReserveICEFRE Indian Council for Forestry Research and EducationMOEF Ministry of Environment and ForestsNGO Non-Governmental OrganizationPA Protected AreaSDR Special Drawing RightsSFD State Forest Department

FOR OMCIAL USE ONLY

INDIA

FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT

CREDIT AND PROJECT SUMMARY

Borrower: India, Acting by its President

Executing Agendes: The Indian Council for Forestry Research and Education(ICFRE), the Ministry of Environment and Forests(MOEF) and the States of Hichal Pradesh and TamilNadu

Amount: IDA Credit of SDR 33.8 million (US$47.0 millionequivalent)

Terms: Standard with 35 years maturity

Financing Plan:

Foreig Local Total.................. .US$ miiion

IDA 22.8 24.2 47.0GOI 0.0 9.4 9.4 v/

Total 33.6 56.4

I/ Includes duties and taxes of US$3.4 milion

Economic Rate of Return: Not applicable

Poverty Category: Not applicable

Staff Appraisal Report: No.12176-IN

Maps: IMRD No. 24927IBRD No. 24928

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performanceof their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.

MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENTOF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION

TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORSON A PROPOSED CREDIT TO INDIA

FOR A FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT

1. I submit for your approval the following report and recommendation on aproposed development credit to India for SDR 33.8 million, the equivalent of US$47.0million, on standard IDA terms with a maturity of 35 years, to help finance a ForestryResearch Education and Extension Project.

2. Background. About 19 percent of the land area of India, or about 64 millionhectares, is covered by forests which play an important role in the conservation ofenvironmental quality. The contribution of the forestry sector to GNP has been estimated atless than two percent, but this does not take into account non-market and external benefits,illegally-harvested fuelwood and timber, nor the importance of the forests to supporting thecatde population. Most of India's forests are degraded and productivity is poor. Forestdegradation is increasing with the rising population and over-exploitation of grazing resourcesin forested areas. Government is addressing the problems of the forestry sector throughpolicy reforms, legislation and afforestaton. The National Forest Policy, revised in 1988,teats forests: first as an ecological necessity; second as a source of goods for use by localpopuladons, with particular emphasis on non-timber forest products; and third as a source ofwood and other products for industries and other non-local uses. The policy encouragesindusties to obtain raw materials from farm forestry. The Eighth Five Year Plan (1992-97)further emphasizes investments for rehabilitation of degraded forests and fann forestry.

3. Forestry research has an important contribution to make to the successfulimplementation of this policy, through the development of forest management systems andtechnologies to improve productivity and the utilization of forest products. The IndianCouncil of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE), established in 1986, is responsible for6 Institutes and a number of research centers, undertaking research in various ecologicalzones. ICRE research supports the sector as a whole, and provides an important source ofthe improved technology required for successful implementation of IDA supported stateforestry projects. There is a well qualified cadre of research staff in India, and the StateForest Deparments, Forest Development Corporations, and the private sector, provide astrucure for the application of research results. However, forestry research is constained bythe lack of a systematic method for determining research priorities and a lack of coordinationamong the various agencies involved in research, which has sometimes meant that researchresults have not been of immediate practical application. In addition, analysis of the socialand economic implications of policies is sometimes incomplete, or has not been kept up-to-date. Other constraints have included frequent rotation of staff, inadequate investment infacilities, equipment, and library and information services, and inadequate operational researchfunding.

4. There are formal forestry education programs in a number of state agiculturaland general universities. The Forest Research Institute in Dehra Dun was recently grantedDeemed Forest University status. The major constraints to formal forestry education relate to

2

curricula that do not adequately reflect the requirements of the new forest policy, the need fora cadre of professional trainers, and a requirement for adequate facilities for post-graduateresearch. Forestry extension is primarily the responsibility of State For:stry Departments(SEDs), though some commercial companies and NGOs run successful extension programs.The focus of ICFRE's activity in extension is, therefore, the development of researchextension linkages. The main constraints to improved forestry extension services include thelack of linkages between the research institutions, the state forest services and the privatesector, lack of resources to mount effective extension campaigns, and the lack of experienceof many staff in research institutes and SFDs.

5. India has a broad range of ecosystems within ten biogeographic zones thatsupport a wide range of flora and fauna. Many species are endemic and some areendangered. A growing appreciation within India of the importance of the conservation ofbiodiversity has led to the establishment of a large number of Protectd Areas (PAs),including 75 national parks and over 400 sanctuaries. Although they are widely distributedthoughout India, they represent less than 4 percent of the total land area. Rapidly growinghuman and livestock populations impose considerable pressures on the PAs, resulting indegradation of vegetative cover and a loss of biodiversity. Past PA management, based onexclusion and policing, has not been effective in arresting degradation. Attempts are nowbeing made to involve local communities in the planning and implementation ofecodevelopment prgrams to generate altenative incomes for those dependent on PAresources and to create an awareness of the benefits of preserving the PAs.

6. Rationale for IDA Involvement and Country Assstance Strategy.Development of the forestry research system is part of a long-term stategy to improve theproductivity and sustainable use of forests. The project should be seen as part of such a long-term strategy and the Bank is one of the few institutions that could provide the necessarycontinuity of support. The Bank is also well plaed to assist in developing inks withinternational forestry research initiatives. In addition, the success of other GOI and Bankinitiatives in the forestry sector in Idia is at least partially dependent on the continuing

development of improved technologies. The Bank's support for research and development ofeffective methods for conservation of biodiversity in India, including ecodevelopmentactivities, is mandated by its strong commitment to improving environmental management.The proposed project would be consistent with the overall country assistance strategy,including the strategy for Bank assistance to the agricultural seo in India, which seeks topromote increased productivity through better selection of investments and more efficientpublic sector management. It is also consistent with the objectives of the Bank's new forestrypolicy and the Asia Region's strategy for forestry lending which link policy dialogue withmajor investments m the forest sector. Finally, the recently completed Expenditure Reviewconcluded that further investment it forestry research deserves priority,

7. Project Objectives The main objectives of the project are to strengthen thecapacity of national and state institutions to plan and underauke prinoity research programs, toimprove the system of forestry education in research and academic institutions, and toimprove the extension of research findings. Supplementary objectives are to improve thepolicy analysis and project prparation capabilities within MOEF, and develop a supportngforestry statistical service. The project would also aim to develop and test, on a pilot bads,

3

methods for conservation of biological resources in protected areas through ecodevelopment.

8. Project Description. The project would be implemented over five years andwould have five main components: (i) Research Management (US$5.8 million) based on thedevelopment of ICFRE to improve the management and coordination of forestry research andextension, through staff training, studies and 4;onsultancies to develop priority settingmethodologies and a management information system, the establishment of an extensionsupport fund, and provision of a headquarters building and equipment; (ii) Research ProgramSupport (US$37.8 million) providing necessary infrastructure, equipment and operatingexpenses for selected research programs in ICFRE institutes, the establishment of a researchgrant fund to commission research by public and private sector agencies, measures to mprovethe quality of plantng stock, human resource development through staff training, scientificreview of institutes and programs, and improvement of library and information systems andstadstical services; (iii) Foresby Educaton (US$1.8 million) involving the development andvaidation of forestry cumcula in formal education through provision of funds for review andrevision work, and development of the Deemed Forestry Univursity at Dehra Dun, primarilyby financing post-graduate research and teaching awards; (iv) Forestry Policy ndPrearation (US$2.2 million) which would strengthen capabilities within MOEF for theanalysis of forest policies and preparation of future forestry projects, through staff trainingand provision for studies and consultancies; (v) Conservaon of Blodiversil (US$5.3 million)which would support development and implementation of programs for ecodevelopment andresource management around two protected areas, the Great Hmaayan National Park(GHNP) in the State of Himachal Pradesh and the Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve(KMTR) in the State of Tamil Nadu. Ecodevelopment would involve communities in theplanning and implementation of programs for alternative natual or soci resource creation orincome generation. Improved planning and management within the PAs, and associatedresearch and monitoring programs would also be financed.

9. The total cost of the project is estimated at US$56.4 million, with a foreignexchange component of US$22.8 million (40 percent of total project costs). The IDA creditwould be for US$47.0 milion, or 88 percent of project costs, excluding duties and taxes. Thebreakdown of costs and financing is shown in Schedule A. The proposed p ntarrangements and the disbursement schedule are given in Schedule B. A timetable of keyproject processing events and the status of Bank Group operations are given in Schedules Cand D, respectively. Maps are also attached. The Staff Appraisal Report No. 12176-IN datedFebruary 1, 1994, is being distributed separately.

10. Project Implementation. The organization of the project would be fulyintegrated with the coordination and management of forestry research, education andextension systems at national, state, research institute and program levels. ICFRE would haveoverall responsibility for management of forestry research, and the ICFRE headquarters staffwould provide project administration, procurement and disbursement services. Detailedresearch program management would be the responsibility of the Diectors of Institutes, andother agencies undertaing the research. Mass extension programs are primarily theresponsibility of the State Forestry Departments, but ICFRE institutes would provide supportand advice. ICFRE also has a role in forestry educadon, directly through the DeemedForestry University, and indirecdy through its role in curriculum development and validaton

4

of forestry degrees in universities. Policy analysis and the oganization of forestry projectprepartion would be undertaken by MOEF. Responsibility for ecodevelopment activideswould lie with MOEF and the SFDs of GOHP and GOIN. Project Steering Committees forForestry Research Education and Extension and for Conservation of Biodiversity would beestablished to ensure coordination of activities amongst the implementing agencies and thatobligatons and assurances agreed during project negotiations are met.

11. Project Sustainability. The sustainability of the project is dependent on thelong-term GOI commitment to forestry research and the conservation of biodiversity. This isevidenced by the clear recognition in the new forest policy of the role of research inimproving forest management and productivity. GO0 commitment is further reflected in theincreased budget for forestry research in 1991 and 1992. The growing awareness in India ofthe importance of biodiversity conservation is evident in government policy statements andamendments to the Wild Life Protection Act. In addition, there would be a phased increasein the GOI contribution to incremental recurrent expenditure during the project.

12. Lessons from Previous BankJIDA Involvement. There has been no Banklending specifically for forestry research in India, but there is a portfolio of projects in theforestry sector, some of which have components to support research and technologydevelopment. These components have seldom been successfully implemented, partly becausestates have not assigned priority to research within the wide range of responsibilities that theycary. For GOI and the states, this lack of commitment to research has pointed to the needfor a project with a specific focus on forestry research. A review of experienc' gained duringthe implementaton of Bank-funded forestry projects indicates the need to movw towards acomprehensive approach to the sector on a national or state-wide basis '. The reviewhighlights the need to raise the productivity of the sector, dtrough improved planting materialsand practices, a strengthened research system, and an effective forestry extension service.Experience in India with Bank support for agricultural research is also relevant and shows theneed for research policy to reflect national priorites for the sector, for improved managementof the research system and associated human resources, based on an effective managementinformation system and a sectoral human resource development plan.

13. Nor has there been Bank or IDA lending specifically for ecodevelopmentactivities in India. Recent forestry projects have included funds for the conservation ofbiodiversity, but there is litde implementation experience, as the projects have been effedvefor only a short period of time. There is experience with ecodevelopment in IltegratedConservation-Development Projects supported by the Bank and IDA in other countries. Arecent review of this experience shows that to be successful, they must form part of a largerframework that includes political support, enabling legislation, realistic insdtutionalanrangements, and compatibility with regional development. These lessons have been takeninto account in the design of the proposed project.

I India. Forest Sector Review. World Bank Report No. 10965 - IN. 1992.

5

14. Agreed Actions. During negotiations with Government, the following assurancesand agreements were obtained:

Conditon of Project Effetiveness: An institution, acceptable to IDA, to providetechnical specialists would be identified and a contract for the provision of their servicesagreed.

Conditon of Disbursement: Disbursement of funds under the Research GrantFund, the Extension Support Fund and the Ecodevelopment Support Fund would depend onthe agreement with IDA on criteria for assessing proposals for funding.

Other Asswunces. These relate to actions to ensure dmely implementation ofproject activides and amongst others include: (a) A methodology for setdng research priorideswould be developed by ICFRE, discussed with IDA and approved by the ICFRE Board ofGovernors by June 30, 1995. Drafts of the National Forestry Research Plan and associatedHuman Resources Development Plan would be completed by June 30, 1996, and agreed withIDA as part of the mid-term review no aer than February 28, 1997; (b) The fomat of theIndian Forestry Research Information System would be agreed with IDA by December 31,1994, and udlized to introduce program budgeting during FY 195-96, for prepartion of the1996-97 budget to the extent pruaicable and fully utilized for the preparadon of the FY 1997-98 budget; (c) The first three proposals for funding under the Extension Support Fund, theResearch Grant Fund, and the Ecodevelopment Support Fund would be submited to IDA forapproval; (d) Annual taining plans, acceptable to IDA, for project-financed training wouldbe prepared not later than September 30, 1994, for the first year of the project and not laterthan April 30 of each subsequent year, (e) Review of the sciendfic activities of at least twoICFRE institutes would be undertken during each year of the project based on Terms ofReference to be agreed with IDA and the recommendations of the reviews would thereafter beimplemented; (f) In consultation with IDA, the review of the curicula for forestry educationin Indian universities would be completed by June 30, 1996; (g) The posts of PA Director inboth GHNP and KMTR would be filled and staff of the Ecodevelopment Planning teams inboth PAs appointed, and responsibility for Forest Rangers and Forest Guards in theecodevelopment areas transferred to the PA Director by September 30, 1994.

15. Environmental Aspects. The project would support research programs aimed atincreasing the sustainability of the use of forest resources within different ecological zones.Project support for research into the management and conservation of these resources, throughinvolvement of communities and tribal peoples would reduce degradation, whilstimprovements to the productivity of plantings on farms, plantations and natural forests wouldreduce exploitation. Proje't support for conservation of biodiversity would have directbenefits for the selected PAs and suroundings and wider benefits, in the long term, for otherprotected areas. The project would, therefore, have beneficial effects on the envirnment.Ecodevelopment planning and implementation would be based on a participatory, micro-levelprocess. Programs would be small and site specific and it is not envisaged that they wouldinvolve resettlement or impact on tibals. They would inmorporate local communitesenvironmental concerns and agreement on the criteria for udizaion of the EcodevelopmentSupport Fund would be a condition of disbursement. The criteria would include the need forproposals to take into account Bank policies on the environment, involuntary resetdement andindigenous people.

6

16. Project Benefits. The project would support a key element of the Government'sstategy for the forestry sector as articulated in the Nadonal Forest Policy. Improvements tothe researh management system would lead to the identification of research priorities thatreflect the tequirements of that policy and the needs of the users of forest resources. Betterresearch/extension linkages and infomation flows would further wprove the relevance andquality of on-going and planmed research programs. In addition, project support for forestryeducation would lead to a cadre of forestry staff with improved capabilities to apply reseawchresults and manage forests in a sustainable manner with the active pardcipation ofcommunities. Project support for the conservation of biodiversity on a pilot basis would havelong-term future benefits by developing effective methods for involving communites in theplanning and implementaton of progams that reduce the pressures on PA resources.Associated research programs would have important benefits for the management of protectedareas as they would provide basic information on the balance between resource use andhabitat preservation. No economic rate of return has been calculated for the project as thenature of research achieven ents and rate and extent of their adoption is impossible to predictand will vary from one agro-ecological zone to another

17. Risks. The main risks affecting the project, as with many reseach projects, are:(i) that resewch findings generated may be irrelevant to the needs of users, either becausetheir needs have not been properly identified, or because changes in economic policies rendernew technologies unsuitable, that is, not economically viable; (ii) that coordination betweenresearch agencies and between those agencies and the users of rch results may not beefective and; (iii) that goverment commitment to funding research may not be sustained.The project is designed to mininize these risks through providing suprort for an improvedmethodology for settng research priorities that explicidy takes into account socio-economicfactors and involves state and private sector ganiions in deciding on priorities. There area number of ris associated with any program for the conservation of biodiversity throughecodevelopment activities as the process is not well developed and is likely to need adaptationfor specific sites. The pilot nature of project support for ecodevelopment minimizs theserisks.

18. Reconmendation. I am satisfied that the proposed credit would comply with theArticles of Agreement of the Association and recommend that the Executive Directosapprove it.

Lewis T. PrestonPresident

AttachmentsWashington, D.C.Febra 1, 1994

Schedule APa,e 1 of 1

INDIA

FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT

Estimated Cosb and Financing Plan

Estmted CostsForeign Local Toal FE

......... (US$ million) ....... %

Research ManagementA. Development of ICFRE 0.9 3.4 4.3 21B. Extension 0.3 1.2 1.5 17

Research Program SupportA. Institute Progrm Support 6.4 8.7 15.1 43B. Planting Stock Improvement 1.1 3.5 4.6 25C. Research System Support 6.7 5.7 12.4 54D. Libry and Infomation Systems 2.7 2.6 5.3 52E. Forestry Statistics 0.1 03 0.4 24

Fostry Education 0.2 1.6 1.8 13

ForesryPoLicy ad Prpation OA 1.8 2.2 16

Consevaion of BiodiversiayA. Ecodevelopment 0.3 3.0 33 10B. PA M gement 0.3 0.8 1.1 30C. Research, Monitoring and Evaluaton 0.2 0.7 0.9 21

Total Baseline Costs 19.6 33.3 52.9 37

Physica Contingencies 1.6 2.6 42 38Price Contingencies 1.6 -23 -0.7 0

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 1/ 22.8 33.6 5 40

Fincing Plan

Foreien Local Total..................... iln)..................

IDA 22.8 242 47.0001 0.0 9.4 I/ 9A

Total 22.8 33.6 56.4

U Includes duties and axes of US$3.4 million

Schedule BPa2e 1 of 2

INDIA

FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT

Procurement Arrangements and Disbursements

Amounts and Methods of Procurement

Project Element Pro cuemert MeAtod. TotalICB LCB Oths Cost.............................. .US$ Mlion.

WorksBuildings 10.0 1.0 11.0

(7.5) (0.8) (8.3)Goods

Equipment/Supplies 7.6 1.0 1.0 9.6(6.1) (0.8) (0.8) (7.7)

Vehicles 1.1 1.1(0.9) (0.9)

Constcies, Sudies and TrainingCapacity Building 3.1 3.1

(3.1) (3.1)Studios and Consulancies 4.3 4.3

(4.3) (4.3)Training 8.5 8.5

(8.5) (8.5)Mlaceaeous

Research Grant, Extension andEcodevelopment Support Funds 2.0 6.7 8.7

(1.8) (6.0) (7.8)Plant Establishment 2.6 2.6

(1.9) (1.9)

Operating Costs 7.5 7.5(4.5) (4.5)

Total 7.6 13.0 S 56A(6-1) (10.1) (30.8) (47.0)

Note. 1. Figs in paess are the respective amounts financed by the IDA CrdL2. Ote methods include force account, shopping, engagement of consult and

training.

Schdule BPan 2 of 2

Summary Disbursement Schedule

Cateyorv Amount Allocated % To be Fmanced...US$millions.. orin Local

'WorksBuildings 83 100 75

GoodsEquipment 7.7 100 80Vehicles 0.9 100 80

ConsultanciesCpacity Building 3.1 100 100Studies and Consultancies 4.3 100 100Training 8.5 100 100

MiscellaneousResearch Grant, Extension andEcodevelopnent Support Funds 7.8 100 80Plant Establishment 1.9 100 80Operating Costs 4.5 100 60 1/

Total 47.0

1/ 85% during the first 30 months of the project period, 50% theafter.

Estimated IDA Disbursements

FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99.......................... US$ milkon

Annual 4.9 11.5 11.5 8.3 7.1 3.7Cumulative 4.9 16.4 27.9 36.2 43.3 47.0

Schedule CPlae I-of 1

INDIA

FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT

Timetable of Key Procesing Events

Time taken to prepare: 20 months

Project prepared by: Government of India with IDAassistance

Fi-st IDA Mission: October, 1992

Appraisal Mission February, May, 1993

Negotiations: December, 1993

Planned Date of Effectiveness July, 1994

List of Relevant PPARS and PCRs: None

1/ This report is based on the findings of an apprisal mission that vidtedIndia in March, 1993, with a follow-up mission in May, 1493. Themission compised L Hill (Mission Leder), N. Jones (FostrySpecialist), P. Guhathar (Forestry Specialist), A. Pritchard (ResearchManagement Specalist), MN Jansen (Environmental Spet) and 0.Campbell (Consultant Rural Sociologist). Ms N. Mattson (FinancialAnalyst) provided support to the mission.

SCHEDULE D.... __...._ .

PAGE . of S

THE STATUS OF BANK GROUP OPERATIONS IN INDIA

A. STATEMENT OF BAN LOANS AND IDA CREDITS

(As of December 31, 1993)

USS Million(net of cancellations)

Loan/ PY of ----------------------------------Credit * Approval Purpose IBRD IDA 1/ Undisbursed 2/

_--- _--------......._ .. .... _ ............. .................................................... --------- -------...... _-.---.......---------.........._

1/ 110 Loans/ 8506.01/ 168 Credits fully disbursed/cancelled 13098.3

1356-IN 1983 Upper Indravati Hydro Power - 170.00 18.202442-IN 1984 Farakka II Thermal Power 278.80 - 36.491496-IN 1984 Gujarat Medium Irrigation - 151.17 17.48SP-20-IN 1984 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric - 13.84 17.26SF-16-IN 1984 Periyar Vaigai II Irrigation - 17.50 3.841426-IN 1984 Popul.tion III - 70.00 1.051424-I'J 1984 Rainfed Areas Watershed Dev. - 22.35 5.86SP-12-IN 1984 Tamil Nadu Water Supply - 36.50 2.681454-IN 1984 Tamil Nadu Water Supply - 36.50 18.401483-IN 1984 Upper Ganga Irrigation - 105.43 21.581544-IN 1985 Bombay Urban Development - 93.70 5.562544-IN 1985 Chandrapur Thermal Power 280.00 - 80.601613-IN 1985 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric - 13.20 17.132582-IN 1985 Kerala Power 156.00 - 95.992534-IN 1985 National Highways 133.00 - 37.921665-IN 1986 Andhra Pradesh II Irrigation - 140.00 64.662660-IN 1986 Cement Industry 165.00 - 19.552674-IN 1986 Combined Cycle Power 485.00 - 15.251643-IN 1986 Gujarat Urban - 50.34 20.192661-IN 1986 ICICI - Cement Industry 35.00 - 3.901622-IN 1986 Kerala Water Supply and Sanitation - 21.80 5.441621-IN 1986 Maharashtra Composite Irrigation - 128.02 109.231631-IN 1986 Nattonal Agricultural Research II - 57.21 21.331619-IN 1986 West Bengal Minor Irrigation - 45.45 27.471623-IN 1986 West Bengal Population - 45.85 10.571737-IN 1987 Bihar Tubewells - 22.29 7.651750-IN 1987 Bombay Water Supply & Sewerage III - 145.00 68.932769-IN 1987 Bombay Water Supply & Sewerage III 30.00 - 30.002796-IN 1987 Coal Mining & Quality Improvement 323.06 - 73.481757-IN 1987 Gujarat Rural Roads - 96.75 45.902827-IN 1987 Karnataka Power 79.48 - 9.842846-IN 1987 Madras Water Supply 53.00 - 29.091754-IN 1987 National Agric. Extension III - 66.62 24.952844-IN 1987 National Capital Power 408.00 - 137.901770-IN 1987 National Water Management - 114.00 46.822785-IN 1987 Oil India Petroleum 140.00 - 9.382845-IN 1987 Talcher Thermal 367.00 - 20S.062813-IN 1987 Telecommunications IX 168.00 - 8.831780-IN 1987 Uttar Pradesh Urban Development - 120.95 58.711931-IN 1988 Bombay & Madras Population - 57.00 16.262928-IN 1988 Indus. Fin. & Tech. Asst. 360.00 - 43.212938-IN 1988 Karnataka Power II 41.69 - 17.692893-IN 1988 National Dairy II 200.00 - 173.142935-IN 1988 Railway Modernization III 270.00 - 33.64

SCHEDULE D

PAGE 2 of S

USS Million(net of cancellations)

Loan/ FY of -------- -----------------------Credit # Approval Purpose IBRD IDA 1/ Undisbursed 2/

1923-IN 1988 Tamil Nadu Urban Dev. - 254.73 120.22

3093-IN 1989 Electronics Industry Dev. 8.00 - 7.50

3058-IN 1989 Export Development 120.00 - 16.18

3096-ZN 1989 Maharashtra Power 354.00 - 296.933024-IN 1989 Nathpa Jhakri Power 485.00 - 443.571952-ZN 1989 National Seeds III - 147.24 59.482022-IN 1989 National Sericulture - 133.35 80.062057-IN 1989 Nat'l. Family Welfare Trng. - 72.76 51.06

3044-IN 1989 Petroleum Transport 50.00 - 15.00

19S9-IN 1989 States Roads - 80.00 1.752994-2N 1989 States Roads 115.00 - 11S.002010-IN 1989 Upper Krishna Irrigation II - 160.00 85.023050-IN 1989 Upper Krishna Irrigation II 45.00 - 45.00

2008-IN 1989 Vocational Training - 163.8S 109.48

3196-IN 1990 Cement Industry Restructuring 300.00 - 193.172115-ZS 1990 Hyderabad Water Supply - 79.90 51.76

2064-IN 1990 industrial Technology Development - 55.00 47.933119-IN 1990 Industrial Technology Development 145.00 - 92.46

3237-IN 1990 Northern Region Transmission 485.00 - 448.592133-IN 1990 Population Training VII - 63.96 48.26

3239-IN 1990 Private Power Utilities I (TEC) 98.00 - 42.542076-IN 1990 Punjab Irrigation/Drainage - 145.28 115.56

2158-ZN 1990 Tamil Nadu Integrated Nutrition II - 67.52 52.69

2130-IN 1990 Technician Education I - 210.74 156.55

2100-IN 1990 Watershed Development (Hills) - 75.00 64.03

2131-ZN 1990 Watershed Development (Plains) - 55.00 51.64

3260-IN 1991 A.P. Cyclone Emergency Reconstruction 40.00 - 11.85

3325-IN 1991 Dam Safety 23.00 - 23.002241-ZN 1991 Dam Safety - 130.00 121.S63364-IN 1991 Gas Flaring Reduction 450.00 - 159.13

2173-ZN 1991 ICDS I (Orissa & Andhra Pradesh) - 74.35 57.02

3334-ZN 1991 Industrial Pollution Control 124.00 - 92.872252-ZN 1991 Industrial Pollution Control - 31.60 30.32

2234-ZN 1991 Maharashtra Rural Water Supply - 109.90 89.83

3258-IN 1991 Petrochemicals II 12.00 - 11.00

3259-IN 1991 Petrochemicals II 233.00 - 149.053344-ZN 1991 Private Power Utilities 2I (ESES) 200.00 - 107.58

2215-IN 1991 Tamil Nadu Agricultural Development - 92.80 71.32

3300-IN 1991 Tamil Nadu Agricultural Development 20.00 - 20.00

2223-IN 1991 Technician education I2 - 255.73 215.33

2300-IN 1992 Child Survival and Safe Motherhood - 214.50 174.92

2394-IN 1992 Family Welfare (Urban Slums) * - 79.00 79.69

2328-ZN 1992 Maharashtra Forestry - 124.00 114.74

2350-ZN 1992 National AIDS Control - 84.00 73.10

3436-IN 1992 Power Utilities Bfficiency 265.00 - 250.98

3498-IN 1992 Second Maharashtra Power 350.00 - 330.49

3470-IN 1992 Second National gighway 153.00 - 153.00

2365-IN 1992 Second National Nighway - 153.00 1SO.012329-IN 1992 Shrimp and Fish Culture ^ 85.00 82.31

2341-IN 1992 West Bengal Forestry ^ 34.00 24.67

2433-ZN 1993 Agricultural Development Rajasthan ^ 106.00 95.96

2439-ZN 1993 Bihar Plateau Development - 117.00 105.47

3627-IN 1993 External Sector & Znvestment 300.00 - 21.76

2450-IN 1993 jharna Mine Fire Control - 12.00 11.39

2483-IN 1993 Karnataka Rural Water Supply * ^ 92.00 91.56

2528-ZN 1993 National Leprosy Elimination * - 85.00 82.863632-IN 1993 NTPC Power Generation * 400.00 ^ 400.00

3630-ZN 1993 Power Finance Corporation 20.00 ^ 20.00

3577-ZN 1993 Powergrid System Development 350.00 ^ 323.13

SCHEDULE D

PAGE 3 of S

USS Million(net of cancellations)

Loan/ FY ofCredit # Approval Purpose IBRD IDA 1/ Undisbursed 2/3___-IN 1993 Rene_abl _ Re_o-r-es Develo_p--t 75___ _ ......... ------- 57.73---------

3S44-IN 1993 Renewable Resources Development 75.00 - 17.73

2449-IN 1993 Renewable Resources Development -115.00 109.7S2409-IN 1993 Rubber * - 92.00 91.70

2470-IN 1993 Sepond Integrated Child Dev. - 194.00 195.56

2448-IN 1993 Social Safety Net Sector Adjustment - 296.20 244.942509-IN 1993 Uttar Pradesh Basic Education - 165.00 154.12

2510-IN 1993 Uttar Pradesh Sodic Lands Reclam. - 54.70 52.61

Total 17699.0 19501.7 9181.85

of which has been repaid 4243.8 1086.1

Total now outstanding 13455.2 18415.6Amount Sold 133.8of which has been repaid 133.8

Total now held by Bank and IDA 13455.15 18415.56

Total undisbursed (excluding ) 4508.5 3925.4

1/ IDA Credit amounts for SDR-denominated Credits are expressed in terms of their US dollarequivalents, as established at the time of Credit negotiations and as subsequentlypresented to the Board.

2/ Undisbursed amounts for SDR-denominated IDA Credits are derived as the undisbursed balanceexpressed in SDR equivalents (in turn derived as the difference between the original principalexpressed in SDRa (based on the exchange rate as established at the time of Credit negotiations)and the cumulative disbursements converted to SDR equivalents at the exchange rates prevailingat the respective dates of disbursements less cancellations expressed in SDR equivalents convertedto US dollar equivalents at the SDR/US dollar exchange rate in effect on Dec. 31, 1993.

e Not yet effective.

Source: Statement of Loans & Credits (LOALA) of December 31, 1993.

SCHEDULE D

PAGE 4 OF S

S. STATEMENT OF IFC INVESTMENTS

(As of December 31, 1993)

Amount (US$ million)

Fiscal Year Company Loan Equity Total

19S9 Repub.ic Forge Company Ltd. 1.50 _ 1.501959-92 Xirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. 0.85 _ 0.851960 Assam Sillimanite Ltd. 1.36 __ 1.361961 K.S.B. Pumps Ltd. 0.21 0.211963-66 Precision Bearings India Ltd. 0.65 0.38 1.031964 Fort Gloster Industries Ltd. 0.81 0.40 1.211964 Lakahmi Machine Works Ltd. 0.96 0.36 1.321964-75-79/90 Mahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. 11.81 2.84 14.651967 Indian Explosives Ltd. 8.60 2.86 11.461967 Jayshree Chemicals Ltd. 1.0S 0.10 1.1S1969-70 Zuari Agro-Chemicals Ltd. 15.15 3.76 18.911977-87 Escorts Limited 15.55 _ 15.551978-87/91/93 Housing Development Finance Corp. 106.29 4.05 110.341980/82/87/89 Deepak Fertilizer and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. 7.50 4.23 11.731981-82 Nagarjuna Coated Tubes Ltd. 1.50 0.24 1.741981-82 Nagarjuna Steels Limited 2.88 0.24 3.121981-86-89 Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. 72.14 24.49 96.631981-90/93 Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 29.71 9.30 39.011982 Ashok Leyland Limited 28.00 -- 28.001982 Coromandel Fertilizers Limited 15.88 _ 15.881982 The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 18.80 _ 18.801982-87/91-93 ITh Signode 2.99 1.01 4.001982-87 The Indian Rayon Corp. Ltd. 14.57 __ 14.571983 Bharat Forge Company Ltd. 15.90 _ 15.901984-86 The Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Weaving) Co. Ltd. 15.95 -_ 15.951985 Bajaj Auto Ltd. 23.93 -- 23.931985 Modi Cement 13.05 -- 13.051985-86/90-91 India Lease Development Ltd. 8.50 0.78 9.281985/91 Bihar Sponge 15.24 0.68 15.921986 Bajaj Tempo Limited 30.54 -- 30.541986/93 India Equipment Leasing Ltd. 5.50 0.30 5.801986 Larsen and Toubro Ltd. 21.78 -_ 21.781982-87-93/94 The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd. 68.00 13.89 81.891987 Export-Import Bank of India 15.45 IS 15.451987 Gujarat Fusion Glass Ltd. 7.52 1.70 9.221987 Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer 38.07 __ 38.071987 Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 7.74 -- 7.741987 Hindustan Motors Ltd. 39.14 __ 39.141987 The Gujarat Rural Housing Finance Corp. -- 0.19 0.191987 Wimco Limited 4.70 -- 4.701987-89/90 Titan Watches Limited 22.02 1.15 23.171988 Invel Transmissions Ltd. -- 1.07 1.071989 Ahmedabad Electricity Company, Ltd. 20.83 -- 20.831989 WTI Advanced Technology -- 0.20 0.201989-90/92 Keltron Telephone Instruments, Ltd. -- 0.56 0.561989-92 Gujarat State Fertilizer 40.46 -- 40.461990 JSB India Securities Firms -- 0.37 0.371990 UCAL Fuel Systems Ltd. -- 0.63 0.631990-91 Tata Electric 111.88 -- 111.881991 ATIC Industries Export Pinance 0.28 -- 0.281991 Bombay Electric 68.00 -- 68.001991-93 CESC Ltd. 82.S1 -- 82.511991 Export Finance - AFDC 0.35 -- 0.351991 Herdilla Oxides and Electronics Ltd. -- 0.29 0.291991 Indust. Credit & Investment Corp. of India -- 26.60 26.601991/93 Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services 15.00 4.92 19.921991 TDICI Development Finance Companies -- 2.05 2.051991/93 TRIVeNI -- 1.68 1.681991 Varun Transport, Storage & Communications 17.04 3.06 20.101992-93 Arvind Mills '22.13 19.16 41.29

SCHEDULE D_ . _ _ _ _

PAGE 5 OF 5

Amount (USS million)

Fiscal Year Company Loan Equity Total

1992 Block KG-OS-IV -- 8.20 8.201992 INDUS VC Mgmt. Co. -- 0.01 0.011992 INDUS VCF -- 1.01 1.011992 Kot,k Mahindra 0.66 -- 0.661992 Nippon Denro 40.00 5.77 45.771992 SK? Bearings 11.50 -- 11.501993 Creditcapital VF -- 0.51 0.511993 PICCO-UCO 3.00 0.25 3.251993 20th CENTURY 16.00 -- 16.001994 Gujarat Ambuja 35.14 8.23 43.371994 Indo Rama Spinning & Weaving 35.00 9.94 44.941994 CRD Cap. Asset Management -- 0.32 0.321994 Information Technology Fund -- 0.64 0.641994 Taurus Strshr. -- 7.17 7.17

TOTAL GROSS COMMITMENTS 1230.52 175.48 1405.99

Less: Cancellation, Terminations, ExchangeAdjustments. Repayments, Writeoffs and Sales 649.30 33.85 683.15

Novw Held by IFC 581.14 141.63 722.77

Undisbursed 125.55 40.81 166.36Soe: Ju........ ........ .. .

Source: IPC, January 7, 1994.

IBRD 2492777-15 7l73 77-45' 78-00'

KANAWAR|L, g soe \ , WILDLIFE

SANCTUARY

PIN' VA;.LLYNAI ICON,Al. PARK

POSSIBLE EXTENSION OKANAWAR WILDLI FE

POSSIBLE EXTENSION OrGREAT HIMALAYAN

\0 / __ _ _ 568 vk > NIATIONAL PARK

X t : f; 0 0 {t wl l k '.' '~~~~~~~~~~~/, ' xh>

5 - %-s FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECT {-' HIMACHAL PRADESH GREAT HIMALAYAN NATIONAL PARK (9

_____ WIWLIPE SANCTUARIES SANCTUARYb *44on

Approximth \ HM_ PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY \ 5ofmrJp C J ju NATIONAL PARKS ~ RIVERS -31-30' 313N

N 2A IDIE ACURE SELECTED ELEVATIONS IMETERSI ¢^vPUNIAB > j3EECODEVELOLOMENT AREA 0 SELECTED CITiES AND TOWNS69

's K UTTAR t //lPOSSIBLE NATIONAL PARK EXTENSION STATE OR TERRITORY BOUNDARIES 7B3 OOI-IAPRDCSAV7777 POSSIBLE SANCTUARY EXTENSION - INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES 4so> RmpuJr JULY 1993;0

IBRD 24928

INDIA

FORESTRY RESEARCH EDUCATION AND EXTENSION PROJECTTOiR k snkosi A KALAKAD MUNDANTHURAI TIGER RESERVE

__ l/PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY

ECODEVELOPMENT AREA

Maniyckch L..........JTIGER RESERVE AREA

4 . . .. . .. RESERVE FOREST AREAS

WILDLIFE SANCTUARIES

Tirun 0~~~~~~~~~ SELECTED TOWNS AND CITIES

mudr- MAJOR ROADS

RAI ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~RAILROADS

/ - RIVERS

I N L E L I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~DISTRICT BOUNDARIES

STATE BOUNDARIES

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY

ee.,. . . . . .. . .. Nonguneori0 ,J J &0' iyodran

KIa.OMETE3S

Banolalore. J,

;Tisoyanviloi KARNATAKA f

X w >3hubpond; 9 \ 2 \~hutop'\ . Podmonobhopuromt\ if TAMIL NADU

KERAtA\

\ < !. .L. _ 4~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~rob,o1l,e g

Travand.6

- p Comorin |J Areo of map SRI LANKA0

JULY 1993