wit.0028.0004.0037 annexure j'k -6 - royal … · estimate of risk of adolescent sexual...

WIT.0028.0004.0037

()

ANNEXURE J'K - 6

e DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

NORTHERN TERRITORY YOUTH DETENTION CENTRES

APPENDIX A: DIRECTIVE 3.4.4 CASE MANAGEMENT AND THROUGHCARE SERVICES MANUAL

CASE MANAGEMENT AND THROUGHCARE SERVICES MANUAL

VERSION NUMBER: 2 ISSUE DATE: September 2016

TRM REF:. DCSOOC16/8536 REVIEW DATE: Mai:ch 2017

This manual is to be read in conjunction with :

,,

DIRECTIVE 3.4.4 CASE MANAGEMENT AND THROUGHCARE SERVICES MANUAL

Appendix A: Directive 3.4.4 Case Management and Throughcare Services Manual 1

WIT.0028.0004.0038

Table of Contents

Overview ... ......... ...... ......... ..... ... ...... .. .. .... .... ... .. ..... .... .... ..... .... .. .... .. .... ... ........ .... .... .... ........... . 4

Admission Process .......................... ..... ........ ... ... ...... .. .... .. .. ... .. ... ........ .. ....... .. ............ .. ....... .. 4

Youth Justice Officer responsibility ........ .... ..... ............. ........ ....... ...... ... ........ ... ...... ..... ... ..... 4

CMATS responsibility ................... ................. .......... ................. ... .......................... .... ........ 5

Within three days of admission: ...... .... ................... ... .............. .... ......... .. .... .... ...... .. ... ..... 5

Within seven days of admission: ... ........... ................. .............. ..... ........... ..... .. ...... .... .... .. 5

Assessment ................................................. .... ... ..... .. ... .. .. ............... ... ........ .. ........... .. .. ......... 6

Risk, Needs, Responsivity (RNR) ...................................... ........... ....... ....... ... .. .................. 7

YLS-CMI ........................................ .... ... .... .... .. .. ....... ....... ................... ..... ...... ..... .. ..... ........ . 7

Initial Assessment ..................................................... ............. ... ... ..... ............. .. ........... ...... 8

Procedure .................................. ......................... .. ............... ........ ... ... ......... ....... ..... .. .... . 8

Specialised assessments ........................................ .. ............. ........ ............. ... ..... ... ...... .. ... 9

Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) ................ ...... ..... ... ... .......... 9

Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR) .. ... ........ ...... .... 10

Case Plan ............................................................................................................ ........ ....... 11

Procedure ........................... ...... .................................................................................. . 11

Treatment and Programs .................... ............................................................................ .... 12

CHART program ................................................ ................... ... ....................... ................. 13

Link with Community Corrections .............................................................. ... ................ 13

Eligibility ..................................................................................................... .... ..... ...... ... 13

Delivery procedure ...................................................................................... .. .... ... ........ 14

Step Up program ............................................................................................. ........ .. ... ... 14

Relapse prevention/Maintaining Change program ................................................... .. ...... 15

Reporting and Recording ................................................................................. .. ...... .......... . 15

Monthly Statistics Reporting .................................................................................... ........ 15

Institutional Reports .......................................................................................... .. .. ........... 15 ) Client Information Filing System .................................................................... ..... ... .......... 16

IOMS procedure ...................................................................................... .... ............ .. .. . 16

Detainee Request Form (Blue Form) ........................ ........................ .... ..... .... ........... ....... 16

Detainee Telephone System ...................................................................... .... ......... .. ...... 17

Communications .............................. .. ........ ... ...... .......... ... .. .... ..... .......... ..... ......... ...... .......... 17

Detainee classification review meetings .................. .. ... .. .. ...................... ............ ............. 17

CMATS Team Meeting ................................ .... ....... ............ ................ ..... .... .. .................. 17

Communications meetings ......... .. .. ... ........... .. .... .. ....... ... ........ ... .................. .. ....... ........... 17

Senior management meeting .......................... ...... .......... ............................ ... ... .. ......... .. .. 18

Meeting attendance breakdown ................... ... .......... .. .......... ...... ........ .................... .. ....... 18

2 Appendix A: Directive 3.4.4 Case Management and Throughcare Services Manual

WIT.0028.0004.0039

Appendices ..... ................................ .......... ............... ...... ........ ............................................. 19

Appendix 1 .. .............. ... ......... ...... .. .. ..... .. .... ..... ..... .. .......... ...... ........... .......................... .... 19

Appendix 2 .. ..................................................................... ................. ... ......... ... .. ...... ....... 20

Appendix 3 ..... ........ ............. ....... .......... ..... ... ..... .. ...... ............. .......... ........ .................. ..... 22

Appendix 4 .......... ............ .......... ... ........ ... .. ... ........... ... ........ ...... ........................... ... ..... .... 23

Appendix 5 .. ....... .... .................................. .......... ..... ... ............. ................................... ..... 24

Appendix 6 .. .. ................ .. ............ ....... .. .. ... ......... ...... .. .. ....... ... ... .... ............................ ...... 26

Appendix 7 .................... ......................................................................... ......... ... ........ ..... 32

Appendix 8 .. ......... .......... .... ........... .................. ........ .......... .................................... ...... .... 34

Appendix 9 ........................ ........ ..... .......... ...... .. ....... ....... .. ........ ... .. ... .... .. ........... ... ... ... ..... 42

Appendix 1 O ... ......... ................................................................... ................... .... .. ......... ... 44

Appendix 11 ..... .... .. ..... ........ .. ....... ........ ........... ...... ... ... .... ........... ... .................................. 45

Appendix 12 ... ....................................................................................................... ...... .... 49

Appendix 13 .... ................................................................................................... ... ....... ... 50


WIT.0028.0004.0040

Overview The Case Management Assessment and Throughcare Services (CMATS) team is comprised of the Principal Psychologist, the CMATS Team Leader, the Case Managers, the Indigenous Support Officer, Sport and Recreation Officer and the Case Management Support Officer.

The CMATS unit is collectively responsible for the following :

• ensuring detainees are provided with a planned and integrated case management process;

• ensuring a process of ongoing planning, assessment and review is in place;

• providing opportunities for the detainee, their parent/s/carer/s and other people significant to the detainee to be actively engaged with case planning and decision making processes;

• incorporating cultural considerations into case planning and program development and delivery;

• collaborating with and seeking input from internal and external stakeholders into case and reintegration plans;

• providing focused interventions that address the needs and risks identified in assessments and case planning; and

• assisting the detainee to address their offending behaviour through participation in interventions that target their assessed criminogenic needs.

Admission Process

Youth Justice Officer responsibility

When a detainee is admitted to a youth detention centre they are immediately received by the Youth Justice Officers responsible for the Admissions process in accordance with Directive 3.2.14 Admissions and Discharges. During the admissions process, the detainee receives :

• an Initial Risk/Needs Assessment (IRNA);

• an Admissions pack; and

• a Health Admission Screen. This is to be conducted by a health practitioner or a medical practitioner within 24 hours of the admission. Where the Health Admission Screen is completed by a health practitioner, the detainee must be referred to the medical practitioner for a full examination as soon as practicable.

The Admissions Officer will provide a file for the new admission to the Case Management Support Officer. If a detainee has been in the detention centre previously the file will be located in the CMATS office. If the detainee was previously in a different youth detention centre to their current admission, the file is to be sent from the previous location to the current to the CMATS team. The detainee file is to be recorded in and managed through the Territory Records Management (TRM) system.


. )

WIT.0028.0004.0041

CMATS responsibility

Within three days of admission:

The following is to occur as soon as possible following admission (best practice is within three days):

• The detainee is to be assigned a Case Manager by the CMATS Team Leader.

• The detainee is to be assigned a classification. This is known as a Security Classification Assessment Transfer Eligibly assessment (SCA TE).

• The initial SCATE is completed by the Case Management Support Officer using information obtained through the Integrated Offender Management System (IOMS). This is to be in accordance with the procedure outlined in Directive 3.4.5 Detainee Classification manual.

• The tool to complete the SCA TE is the Initial Classification Instrument found at Attachment 1.

• The case manager is to conduct an introductory session with the detainee including:

o introducing the detainee to different meetings they might attend;

o introducing the detainee to other youth detention staff members that will be involved in their care,

o providing the detainee with the opportunity to ask any questions they have about their detention period.

• A regular meeting is to be scheduled between the case manager and the detainee on a weekly basis. These client meetings are to be scheduled through the Visits Booking Officer in accordance with Directive 3.3.4 Personal and Professional Visits.

Within seven days of admission:

Collateral information

• All collateral information for the detainee is to be collected. This may include (where applicable):

o precis/sentencing remarks;

o family information;

o education/work history;

o Involvement with child protective services (i. e. Department of Children and Families);

o any information relating to mental health issues;

o any relevant information relating to their physical health;

o any information relating to substance misuse; and/or

o any information relating to involvement with other agencies.

• This information is to be recorded in on the detainee's TRM file and in IOMS.

Criminal history • It is necessary to ensure that the information regarding the detainee's criminal

history is up to date. 5

Appendix A: Directive 3.4.4 Case Management and Throughcare Services Manual

WIT.0028.0004.0042

a If a criminal history report is older than three months, a new one must be ordered using the criminal history record template found at Appendix 1 ) .

a The electronic copy of this form is saved under 'intake' in the CMATS folder on your computer (G drive).

o The most recent criminal history record is to be saved to IOMS as attachment type: NTPS Crim History.

Screening

• The following screening tools must be completed during a meeting between the Case Manager and the detainee:

o an alcohol screen using the AUDIT tool (found at Appendix 2);

o a drug screen using the DUDIT tool (found at Appendix 3)

o a measure of psychological distress using the K1 O tool (found at Appendix 4)

• The completed screening tools and any associated case notes are to be placed on the hard copy TAM file and entered into IOMS.

• Any acute issues (Le. high scores on the screening tools) generated from the screening needs to be emailed to and discussed with the Case Management Team Leader and actioned immediately.

• Electronic copies of these screening tools are saved under 'assessment' in the CMATS folder on your computer (G drive).

Scheduling client sessions

• Weekly re-occurring client sessions are scheduled through Visitor Reception Officer.

• The Case Manager should send an email to the Visitor Reception Officer outlining proposed dates/times for sessions.

Offender Management Plan

• An IOMS Offender Management Plan (OMP) must be completed for all sentenced youth within seven days of sentencing.

• For detainees with long remand periods (approximately eight weeks or longer), the IOMS OMP must be completed within six weeks in line with the Report of Government Services reporting timeframes.

Assessment The Department of Correctional Services (the Department) has adopted the best practice principles of risk, needs and responsivity in managing detainees in the youth justice system. A universal assessment tool, the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory 2.0 (YLS/CMI) has been adopted by the Department for use within youth detention centres and for detainees under the supervision of community corrections.


)

WIT.0028.0004.0043

Risk, Needs, Responsivity CRNR)

The RNR (best practice) principles provide the rationale for structured risk assessment with detainees:

1. Risk principle: the level of service should vary with level of risk.

• Match level of services to level of risk.

• Prioritise supervision and treatment resources for higher-risk offenders.

• Lower risk cases do as well or better with minimal service.

2. Need principle: appropriate targets of service are matched with criminogenic needs

• Match interventions to criminogenic needs (these are dynamic factors).

• Prioritise treatment to highest scoring criminogenic needs.

• In the case of a tie in scores, treat the intrinsic need first.

3. Responsivity principle: modes of service are matched to the learning styles and abilities of the detainee

• Specific - match intervention and strategies to learning styles, motivation, and demographics of the individual.

• General - use social learning and cognitive behavioural strategies.

4. Professional Override principle: of case classification states that having considered the risks, needs, and responsivity; decisions are made as appropriate under the prevailing conditions. The YLS/CMI is designed to assist the worker in the collection and analysis of risk, need, and responsivity (linking that information with case planning). It is NOT designed to replace professional judgments or to dictate decisions.

VLS-CMI

The YLS/CMI provides an assessment of the "Central 8" criminogenic risk/needs, as well as responsivity and case management planning to guide the targets of intervention and management of detainees.

YLS/CMITM Section 1 The "Central Eight" Subcomponents Criminogenic Needs

Prior & Current Offences History of Antisocial Behavior

Family Circumst<tnces/Parenting -- Family/Marital

Education/Employment Education/Employment

Peer Relations Antisocial Associates

Substance Abuse Substance Abuse

Leisure/Recreation Leisure/Recreation

Personality/Behaviour Antisocial Personality Pattern

Attitudes/Orientation Antisocial Attitudes


WIT.0028.0004.0044

Initial Assessment

Procedure

• All detainees are to receive an assessment by their Case Manager, with the YLS/CMI within the first two weeks of admission. There may be consideration to using a previous YLS/CMI for a detainee and this decision is reserved for the CMATS Team Leader or the Principal Psychologist.

• A YLS-CMI risk assessment, or other specialised risk assessment, MUST occur prior to any program placement.

• Prior to the assessment taking place, the Case Manager must obtain informed consent from the detainee to participate in the assessment. This is the detainee consenting to provide information for the assessment. Where a detainee does not provide consent, the Case Manager will attempt to gather the relevant required information from other internal and external sources. The informed consent form is found at Appendix 5 and the electronic copy is saved in the CMATS folder on the G drive.

• At present Case Managers must complete the following steps:

o complete the paper-based YLS-CMI with the detainee (A copy of the YLS-CMI is located at Appendix 6);

o enter the responses in the IOMS YLS-CMI in the Offender Management tab under "Assessments"; then

o the CMATS Team Leader is to verify the YLS/CMI assessment in IOMS;

o enter a case note in IOMS and on the paper YLS-CMI noting the risk/need outcome (noting that the result has been forwarded to the Team Leader (via email) if moderate or high outcome result) ; and

o file the paper-based YLS/CMI in the detainee's TRM file, allocating the document a TRM number in accordance with the Departmental recordkeeping processes.

• If a detainee has been charged with sexual or violent offences, the Case Manager must alert the Principal Psychologist, who will decide if a specialised assessment is required in addition to the YLS-CMI.

o The Offender Management Plan (OMP) is to be completed prior to the outcome of any specialised assessment deemed applicable. The OMP must be updated once the specialised assessment has been completed.

• If there are concerns during the assessment that the detainee has an intellectual impairment; the Case Manager must send an email to the Principal Psychologist outlining the concerns or information that has led to an intellectual impairment query.

• Information that may warrant an intellectual impairment referral includes:

o a prior diagnosis of intellectual disability;

o prior neuropsychological testing that has identified a cognitive deficit;


WIT.0028.0004.0045

)

o presence or likelihood of Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD); and/or

o any comment in the detainee's file information that suggests a low functioning status.

• If a detainee with an intellectual impairment query has otherwise been found suitable for group programs, and there is sufficient information to warrant it, the Principal Psychologist or Case Management Team Leader will conduct a cognitive assessment for the purposes of program suitability.

Specialised assessments

Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY)

The SAVRY is used for the assessment and management of risk for violence and other serious antisocial behaviour in adolescent males and females age 12-18 years. SAVRY is based on the structured professional judgement model of risk assessment and a review of the scientific literature on adolescent development and youth violence. SAVRY contains 24 risk and 6 protective factors. SAVRY risk items are grouped into three domains: historical, social/contextual and individual. All risk factors are scored low, medium/moderate or high. The protective factors are scored absent or present.

The practitioner/clinician arrives at a final risk summary: low, moderate or high risk of serious antisocial behaviour within a specified timeframe. The final risk rating takes the number of risk/needs factors into account, the specific constellation and possible case-specific factors not included among the 24 + 6 SAVRY items.

The aim of SAVRY is to guide the clinician to a better informed assessment of the level of risk that could aid interventions, including support, treatment and management. Assessing violence risk with detainees is less problematic ethically when one also tries to reduce the assessed risk by targeted case-specific interventions.

In NT youth detention centres, the SAVRY assessments may only occur for sentenced youth and remanded detainees where the youth has previous convictions for violent offences. Only sentenced youth will be eligible for individual treatment options.

Youth detention implementation

Outcome Status Action

Low Risk Remand and Sentenced No further action , use YLS-CMI outcome to determine treatment pathway

Moderate Risk Remand Step Up Program -detainee's name will be placed on waitl ist by the Team Leader, for entry into the program.

Moderate Risk Sentenced Step Up Program -detainee's name will be placed on waitlist by the Team Leader, for entry into


WIT.0028.0004.0046

the program.

High Risk Remand or Sentenced (with Step Up Program -less than three months on detainee's name will be sentence) placed on waitlist by the

Team Leader, for entry into the program.

High Risk Sentenced (with three or more Individual treatment with months left on sentence) Principal Psychologist.

If a high-risk detainee on remand status is sentenced while participating in the Step Up Program, and receives three or more months in detention on their sentence, the detainee will be removed from the program and will commence treatment with the Principal Psychologist.

The Principal Psychologist will adapt the individual program to ensure credit is given for work done during the program, in addition to any CHART sessions.

The CHART Program may commence AFTER individual treatment has been completed, if time permits.

Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism CERASOR}

The ERASOR is an empirically-guided checklist to assist evaluators to estimate the short-term risk of a sexual re-offense for youth aged 12-18. The ERASOR was designed as a single-scale instrument, and the 25 risk factors that are evaluated fall under 5 headings: Sexual Interests, Attitudes, and Behaviors, Historical Sexual Assaults, Psychosocial Functioning, Family/Environmental Functioning, and Treatment. All risk factors are coded as either Present Possibly/Present, Present, Not Present, or Unknown, and the coding manual outlines the specific coding criteria - in addition to the research/clinical support - for each factor.

In NT youth detention centres, the ERASOR assessments may only occur for sentenced youth and remanded detainees where the youth has previous convictions for sexual offences. Only sentenced youth will be eligible for individual treatment options.

Youth detention implementation

Outcome Status Action

Low Risk Remand and Sentenced No further action, use YLS-CMI outcome to determine treatment pathway

Moderate to Remand or Sentenced (with Principal Psychologist to work High Risk less than three months on closely with Case Manager to

sentence) monitor risk and behaviour of the detainee, and to ensure case plan is progressing. If at any time a high-risk detainee on remand status is sentenced, and receives three or more months left on sentence, the detainee to commence treatment with


WIT.0028.0004.0047

Principal Psychologist. This can also be carried over into the community, if the detainee receives enough time on a combined detention and community-based order.

Moderate to Sentenced (with three or more Individual treatment with High Risk months left on sentence) Principal Psychologist.

Case Plan Procedure

• Following the assessment, a case plan is to be developed. Case conferencing is to occur in the formation of and/or implementation of the case plans. The Case conference can include relevant internal and external stakeholders including Community Corrections, Department of Children and Families, NAAJA throughcare, Department of Education, Department of Health etc.

o A copy of the case plan template is provided under Appendix 7 and electronic copy is saved under 'case planning' in the CMATS folder on the G drive computer.

• When the case plan has been completed, this plan must be discussed with the detainee.

• The detainee should then sign the case plan to demonstrate their acceptance of the case plan.

• The signed copy of case plan is to be saved in IOMS under "Attachments".

• The Case Manager must liaise with the relevant Probation and Parole Officer (PPO) that has had previous or future identified involvement with the detainee, regarding the Case Plan.

o This liaison should particularly discuss any commencement and/or continuation of the Changing Habits And Reaching Targets (CHART) program where it has been identified as an intervention pathway.

o To identify the appropriate PPO (where relevant) , the Case Manager should go into !OMS/File contents/Caseload history and identify Probation and Parole Officer (PPO) (if there is one allocated).

o If this information is not readily available from IOMS, please check the Daily Census 'P&P Office/Place of Residence', and contact the Community Corrections Team at that location in order to identify whether there is a PPO involved with the detainee.

• Any communication regarding the case plan should be documented as a case note in !OMS and on the detainee's hardcopy TRM file.

" Case plans are to be reviewed every time a detainee is re-classified. The reviewed case plan should be discussed with the detainee and then signed by them.

o All case plans that are reviewed due to re-classification should be attached in the IOMS SCA TE assessment as a supporting document.


WIT.0028.0004.0048

Treatment and Programs Following the assessment process and once the case plans are developed, detainees should commence participation in the relevant treatment and/or other programs or interventions that have been identified in their case plan.

Most of the programs and treatment services are facilitated by the CMATS unit with a small number that are externally sourced and provided. The summaries of psychoeducational and treatment programs that may be available within the youth detention centres are found at Appendix 8.

The following table provides an indication of the types of treatment and intervention that may be applicable to detainees depending on their risk/needs identified by the YLS/CMI assessment:

YLS/CMI outcome Treatment Low Risk • Case Management sessions that focus on case planning for

Remand and Sentenced non-criminogenic need areas.

• Cultural Programs as identified by the Indigenous Support Officer.

Moderate and High Risk • CHART Program where deemed suitable in liaison with the

Remand CMATS Team Leader.

• Step Up Program (if prior history of aggression and violence)

• Guiding Circles (if education/ employment are assessed as high need).

• DAISY/ADSCA Program (if substance use assessed as high need).

• Love Bites (if youth aged between 15-17 years) .

• Cultural Programs as identified by Aboriginal Cultural Liaison Officer.

• Any other program deemed appropriate by Case Manager in conjunction with Team Leader.

Moderate and High Risk • CHART Program for sentenced youth (Case Manager to utilise

Sentenced CHART Program in client sessions)

• Step Up Program (if prior history of aggression and violence)

• Guiding Circles (if education/ employment are assessed as high need).

• DAISY/ADSCA Program (if substance use assessed as high need).



• Any other program deemed appropriate by Case Manager in conjunction with T earn Leader.

Moderate and High Risk • CHART Program (Case Manager to liaise with Principal (Low functioning) Psychologist regarding suitability of CHART Program tor low


)

WIT.0028.0004.0049

)

YLS/CMI outcome Treatment

Sentenced and Remand functioning offenders).

• Step Up Youth Violence Program (if prior history of aggression and violence). CMATS Team Leader to be informed of Moderate/High Risk outcome, type/nature of offending, low functioning status, and the detainee's name will be placed on waitlist for entry into the program if suitable

• Guiding Circles (if education/ employment assessed as high need). This program should be adapted by clinician to suit the needs of the detainee. Principal Psychologist to be informed to ensure program suitability.

• DAISY/ADSCA Program (if substance use assessed as high need). This program should be adapted by clinician to suit the needs of the detainee. Principal Psychologist should be informed to ensure program suitability.



• Any other program deemed appropriate by Case Manager in conjunction with CMATS Team Leader.

CHART program

The Changing Habits And Reaching Targets program (CHART) is run in the youth detention centres and also in Community Corrections. This means there are a high number of detainees that will commence the program in one part of the correctional system and potentially complete it in the other.

Link with Community Corrections

In order to ensure consistency and collaboration across the Department in delivering CHART, the Case Managers must liaise with the relevant PPOs regarding the Offender Management Plan, and in particular, discuss commencement and continuation of CHART if it has been identified as an intervention pathway.

The responsible Case Managers and PPOs both need to consider the following:

• Is the detainee eligible for CHART based on YLS-CMI outcome?;

• Is there enough time to complete CHART core modules?; and

• Consider where the detainee will be released to and if they will be under Community Corrections supervision. This will assist with throughcare planning for continuation of CHART.

Eligibility

In most cases, the CHART program will not be used with youth who have been convicted of sexual offences.


WIT.0028.0004.0050

Sentenced detainees

To be eligible for CHART, a detainee must have at least three months on a detention order, or on a combined detention order and period of community supervision. Comprehensive case notes on IOMS and on file need to be maintained to ensure the program transfers appropriately.

Remanded detainees

The CHART Remand program is available for certain detainees who, due to their charges or known court dates, will be in detention for a significant period of time.

Case Managers should discuss the use of the CHART Remand program with the Team Leader to ensure it is an appropriate intervention. As CHART is a framework for working with youth, it is important that it is considered in all eligible cases.

Delivery procedure

• Please be advised of the following process that needs to be followed after every CHART session:

a A case note must be entered in IOMS and the TRM paper file containing a review of the session.

a Ensure that the first line of the case note identifies which module was worked on in the session, and which handouts were completed.

a Ensure that information is included detailing:

• how the detainee presented in the session;

• what content was covered;

• what activities were used to cover the content;

• whether the detainee engaged (e.g. demonstrated selfawareness/understanding etc. of the content covered); and

• any challenges that they experienced.

Step Up program

The Step Up program was developed by the Department's Offender Programs and Services unit in 2015. This is a program specifically for youth, which has been modified for delivery for use with detained youth (addressing general anger and violence) and for youth on community based orders, the latter being able to incorporate the youth's family members in the provision of the program. The program is delivered in a closed format and it is structured to be delivered over a 4-6 week period in detention or 5 full days in the community. Assessment for the program (pre and post testing) using the VRS-YV tool.

For detainees referred to the Step Up Program, the Violence Risk Scale: Youth Version Scale (VRS:YVS) forms the pre and post-test measure. The VRS:YVS looks at motivation for change on a range of risk factors. This scale should be completed prior to, and following, program engagement (refer to Appendix 9) .

Case notes for the Step Up Program are to be completed within !OMS.


WIT.0028.0004.0051

)

Relapse prevention/Maintaining Change program

For high-risk detainees that have successfully completed an individual treatment program with the Principal Psychologist, and who are released on an order under the supervision of Community Corrections, the detainee may be eligible for the Relapse Prevention/Maintaining Change Program.

This program aims to assist detainees with the transition from detention to the community, to maintain the changes they have made during intensive treatment. The Principal Psychologist will alert the Case Manager and the relevant PPO whether a detainee is eligible for this program, following treatment completion.

Reporting and Recording

Monthly Statistics Reporting

Key Performance Indicators (KPls) must be completed for each month. KPls include the number of:

• YLS-CMI assessments;

• Offender Management Plans;

• CHART Program delivery;

• Group Program Facilitation; and

• Attendance at meetings.

KPls for Case Managers and Team Leader need to be documented on the statistics form, and sent to the Principal Psychologist at the end of each month and saved on the computer in the G drive under ST AFF/CMU/Program Statistics

A copy of the template that is required to be completed each month is provided under Appendix 1 O and electronic copy is saved under 'program statistics' in the CMA TS folder on the G drive on the computer.

Institutional Reports

The Court or Parole Board can request an institutional report for a detainee.

For court requests, these will usually come through a Community Corrections Team Leader but sometimes directly from the Court, as part of a Pre-Sentence Report request. These documents need to be completed within the specified time frame.

Institutional reports for the Court are currently to be completed as a paper based report, which is then forwarded to the appropriate contact at Community Corrections. Once completed by the Case Manager, institutional reports are to be sent to the CMATS Team Leader at least two days prior to due date for sign off . They are then signed off by ttle Superintendent.

A copy of the institutional report template is provided under Appendix 11 and the electronic copy of the template is saved under 'institutional reports' in the CMATS folder on the G drive. Completed institutional reports are to be saved in the same drive.


WIT.0028.0004.0052

Parole Board Institutional Report requests are to be completed on IOMS with the following instructions:

• locate the report under File Contents/Offender Management/Boards and Committees;

• select the report identified as 'Awaiting Information' and click on this;

• click "Institution Report", Open for Editing, and complete the required fields; and

• print a copy of this report and save it to the paper file.

Client Information Filing System

There are two file sources for client files within youth detention:

• a hardcopy TRM file; and

• an electronic IOMS record.

Where a detainee has not previously entered the NT youth detention system, a new file is provided to the CMATS team as part of the Admissions process for the detainee. This will either be a new file where the detainee has not entered the youth detention system previously; or.

For detainees who have had a previous admission, a continued file from the detainee's previous detention period is to be used. The hardcopy file can be located through a TRM search. The Case Manager will need to order an updated criminal history report for a detainee returning to the youth detention system if the previous report is more than three months old.

Any contact with a detainee or about a detainee, by any CMATS staff member needs to be recorded as a case note. All case notes need to be recorded in IOMS.

IOMS procedure

On IOMS the correct section to place your case notes are as follows:

• File Contents/Offender Management/Case File;

• select Case Notes tab;

• select Add new case note;

• add comments as required; and

• click save.

A copy of the required template for hardcopy case notes is provided under Appendix 12; and for individual treatment content that is sensitive and unable to be modified for IOMS without losing important information; the electronic copy is saved under 'Case Planning' in the CMATS folder on the G drive on the computer.

Detainee Request Form {Blue Form)

The detainee request forms are printed when received and taken to Admissions and placed in a tray for CMATS to collect. The CMATS Team Leader reviews all request forms prior to distributing them to the Case Managers and the Case Management


)

WIT.0028.0004.0053

Support Officer. The blue forms are actioned by the Case Management Support Officer unless directly relating to an issue needing Case Manager involvement.

The Case Management Support Officer will alert the Case Manager if a detainee request requires their attention.

Detainee Telephone System Each detainee has a telephone list. Allocated detainee telephone lists are processed and regulated through the Prisoner Telephone System (PTS) process in accordance with the allowances specified in Directive 3.4.5 Detainee Classification Manual.

Telephone lists are activated on admission, or shortly thereafter, by the Case Management Support Officer. Detainees may request a telephone number to be added to their list, and this request will be considered and actioned by the Case Management Support Officer. At times, a Case Manager may be asked to provide input into the suitability of a particular number being added to the telephone list.

Communications

Detainee classification review meetings

The detainee classification review meetings occur weekly with the following attendees. Representatives from the CMATS team must attend these meetings. Other membership requirements and the procedures for assessing detainee classification are contained in Directive 3.4.5 Detainee Classification Manual.

CMATS Team Meeting The CMATS team meetings are to occur fortnightly and all CMA TS staff from the Don Dale Youth Detention Centre and the Alice Springs Youth Detention Centre are to attend.

The CMATS team meetings are for discussion about clinical issues and CMATS operational matters. There is also opportunity for team members to present a case presentation on one of their clients.

If applicable, Case Managers should identify a client they are having some issues with in terms of assessment, treatment or throughcare planning, and discuss in the group format to identify strategies that might assist with staff learning.

The Case Presentation template is provided at Appendix 13 and is to be used to guide case discussions. This template can be found in the CMA TS folder on the computer on the G drive.

Communications meetings

The communications meetings are to occur fortnightly and the CMATS Team Leader, Case Managers and, where required, the Principal Psychologist are to attend. These meetings are also attended by staff from Community Corrections and relevant external stakeholders.


WIT.0028.0004.0054

Senior management meeting

This meeting occurs weekly within the Don Dale Youth Detention Centre. The CMATS Team Leader and the Principal Psychologist attend along with a range of other staff members including the Superintendent, Deputy General Manager and the Principal of Tivendale School (the DDYDC school).

Meeting attendance breakdown

CMATS Team Leader


)

. )

WIT.0028.0004.0055

Appendices

Appendix 1

Nur n1ern Territory Police

REOUE81' FOR JNFORMATlON CRIMINAi. HISTORY & W/\RRMff UNIT

llMJ\IL: crlmlnaLhlalo..,[email protected] . .u · FACSIMILE: 08 8922 3258 - TELEPHONE: 08 8922 3721

..... . • · ·- ···"'"' ' 1tc! r .uw1 v ... 1 Rt~Uf::3TI I Jt PP'l.YI

URGENCY: D HIGH ci...a than 1 Hr) D MedNm (IH• than 8 hrs) 0 Low (~H than 3 d•v•l

Pl!AllE ACCESB NPfUI f, ADVISE REFl!JU!HCI! NUllBl!RS

0~1ice llt-n lnformllllon It.quired:

0 In Cu1tody 0 Employment

0 ln~ation P\Kpou1 O Fn•rm Ucen,;e

0 Other (Specify)

Type af lrdonn1llon R41<1ulnd: 0 Criminlll Conv~~on1 D Mis!llng Pllnllln

D Warrants D Raatraini1111 Oilier

0 Advmso Fwearme Mls!Dly 0 Provious Seit Harm in Custody

0 Photo (JPEG) 0 Other (apedfy)

Delal of Pol'Mln on Whom lnfonnallon ltaqulnid:

MDLHo:

0.11111 of Vehicle of 'Milch lnlonMtlon Requited: RegltlrllHon No: ~:

MakwMlldel ColoUJ.

VehJClt rype:

Pf\one Num~ar.

SlallonlAgency FAX lllumher:

F!NIR•t.- Numl!er

0 Third Plrly

Deourt 0 COARECTKlNS

D Treflic Conviction• OMDLDalllila

0 Molor Vehicle Demits

__ 1_1_

!moll phal;;,Nplr to "''l!U! <JL 1t1l~(l_s,,_,.,,_,,,,lllll'"-'""~u,.

'Tlu; W\JtmMUDn ~laiftYd ft<'* 811 ~ :,1zr be ~ilAdM11 ·~ 1fltltmmkln. ~mar J~ be 1"9 1u .. 14 or~ ~·.-,.. pijalc ....,_, 1rm10'9w t'I • ,:u.-.vrt .. : '1w.19919 !f v~ .- nol ttte ft11i'dlrl nt"'tte01. d"Y use •teeuia .;ir GOP'r!flQ at ,,,.,. dO<W'nMt g ..,a1Mtcl"90d.. I ~ ,...,,... raOlt!Wd tflil ~ ,,. 'ffl'Of p l.-•

.. ,..h_ Do.w•• oe .. az 1'80, ...-.. s,.n • .,.. °' ""' llllll.


WIT.0028.0004.0056

Appendix 2

Austrnlhm G1wrrnmcnl Alcohol Screen (AUDIT)

,........,,J:·..........

I lhcg111di! ,1bove conrmns exa r1¥J!Os of one standard drink. A full ~u~ can or stubbie contains one and a lwlf standard drinks.

lnlJoduction ll<!c.lllle alc:ohot 11Se coo alk.'ct l'eallh nd 1nll)ffere with certain mro1c:a1Jons and 1reatrnen11, 11 is l!llfXllt.lllt U\¥ Ill! ask yo11 1Vme qtJC51ions aboot your use d ,1icolnl YOU! Jl1Sl\l'IS Wlil ll!m.11nconfltmlal. so please be as auum1e .1s possible. fry to OflSMlf ihc1JJC5tion1 in trrrns al 'standard drinks' Plo.1!>1! ask for c1;r1ficalion if required.

AUDIT Questions Please lick the msponsc thal best fits your drinking

g

10,

/low often do you have a drink conlmmng alcohol?

How manySUl!'Glrd drinks do you have on a i'jp1col day Vde1 roo e d11nk1ng?

How alien do )'-OIJ have six or more standard drinks on one occ.1s1on 7

f1ow citro during the last year ha'll!)W found !hat you wue nol a ore to slop d1 inking 000! you hod Sta~('(!?

How often ciJn~ the last 'J!'ilf 1\1\'e you filllcd to do whilt was 11111111i1lly 1!Xpl'll"1 of you bo:au>c uf dr ntj7

How olrenciJlrgdte lasl )'Qlf hil\C~ had ii freling or gu111or1cmo1se aftL~ <!lloklng'

Have~ or someore ~lse been injured beciluse of Y'» 1n1Untj7

Has a fl!iatl'll!. fnl'fld. doctor. or OlhEr health caro v.akel bl'Ell CCl'Celflell .ibout )'lllU l111n1Cing (II 5UglJ!Sll'd )OJ OJI down 1

Supplementary ~lions

IJo )011 lhink you pmsenlly have a fKObk!m with dnnkmg?

In the ne•t 3 mont~s. how r@icult woul~ you find 1t lo cul down nr Slop drinking? I

D .. GolOO. 9 ~ IU

0

~ I -t

~ i 0 1

I/{)

D

0

D

]Vil

D leis /hJn n~ttd

0

D

0

0

D

0

I Ila Pro/J;iJty

NOJ

D I 0

Ve1y1my Fairfyoo.1y

D I

' D

:

I

D

l IJ6

D Mx'ihly

0

0

0

0

D

0

0 10 no[) JOcrmae

0 :Vootly

0

0

D

D

0 t-

0

t ~ ID lo I D_

I D y., wmqthl/"51

)'Oii

D I D -I- -

I 0

I 0

/Jns<P! f'ossibly De(lllJJl!iy

0 I D r 0 i Neitlw:ir

drlfiwll ocr fatfydlflQJ/l VrJy riifftwh rusy

D I

D ' D i I


I

Smo Sub tOlals

D

D

DD D

D

DD D D

D DD

IOIAl

D

00718 Ml) 111 r:J ?

20

WIT.0028.0004.0057

How to score and interpret die AUDIT

The World Health Organization's Alcohol Use Disorders ldenl1fic;iLion lest (AU DID is a very reliable and simple screening 1001 wllicn is seosiLive to early detectiOll of Ji sky and high risll (or hazardous and harmful] drinking It has Ull ee qLie$lions on alcohol consumplion (1 to 31. three questions on drinking behaviour and dependeflce (4 to 6) and four questions on the consequences or problems rela!ed to drinking (7 lo 10)

The Supplementary Questions do not belo119 to the AUDIT and are not SCOled fhey provide useful clinical infOlmation associated wilh the client's peiceplmn ol whe!hel !hey have an alconol prolllem am !heir confidence Iha! change is po5Slble in the short-term They oct as an 1ndicallon of the degree of 1n1eivention required and provicX? a link to counselling or briel intervention following fredback ol the AUOlf Slore to the client

Scoring Illa AOOIT The columns in the AUDIT arc scored from left to rigliL

Questions 1 to a are scored on a fore-point scale from o, 1, z, 3, and 4 Questions 9 6 1 O are scored on a three -point scale from o, 2 and 4.

Record tt-1! score lor each question in the "scora" column on llie riqhL including a iero for questions 2 to 8 if 'sllipped'

Record a total score m the "TOTAL· box at the bottom of the column. The maximum score 1s 40

eonsun.,uon score Add up questions 1 to 3 ¥1d p!llte this sub Sl:Ofe in the iMljilCl.'lll >ingle box in the far righl column (maximum score possible = 12). A scorn of 6 or l may tndw;aie 3 rlsll ol alcohOl -tel~tcd h.Jrm. Mil I lh1s is also tOO UJtal score IOI the AUDIT (e g. consumption could be over the recomrnern1ed weekly intake of 2B for men and 14 for females in lhe absence of scoring on any athl!I questions) . Drinking may also take place in dangerous sib.Jations (e g driving. fishing/boating) Scores or 6 to 7 may also indialle porential hal111 fll those g-Cllps roote susceptible to lhe effects of alcohol. soch as young JE>Ple, v.umen. lhe elderly, people with mental heallh problems and people on medication. Furthet inquiry may reveal the necessity for harm reduction advice

Dependence score Add up questions 4 lo 6 afld place !his sub-score 1n the adjacent single box in the far right column (f113Ximum score possible= 12). In addition lo the total AUDIT score. a socondary 'dependence' score of 4 or more as a subtotal ol questions 4 lo 6. suggests the possibility ol alcohol dependence (and lherefore lhe need for more intensiVl! intervention if further assessment conftrrns dependence).

Alcohol-ralatad problems score Any scoring on questions 7 to 10 warrants further investigatioo to derermine •Nhelher the problem 1s of currenl coni:ern and requires intervention

AIHJIT TOia/ score ~score Risk lewl

o -l below ~ Low-risk

B - 15 below 4 Risky oc haz•dous level. Mooo-1Jle risk of tarn May include some clients currently expEl'iencing harm (especially those who have minimised their fl'pU!lld irlllkc and problems).

4 Of more Assess for dependency

16 - 19 llelow 4 Hif!-risk or hannhll level.

20 or fllffe helow 4

4 01111ore

Drinking !hat will eventually result 1n harm. if not already doing so. May he dependent

As~ for depernEnce

Hi~sk IJl'finilc harm ~lso likely to :ic

alrohol rlepcndenl. Assess 'nr dependence

Almost catUinly dependent. Asses> fvr depernJenr.y

Possible lnfE£ventiorrs

Use 'Right Mix· rnaterialS lo reinf01ce low· risll drinking. particularly for those who previously had alcohol problems Of whose circumstances rn<1y change Harm reduction advice rn<1y be appropriate for those in susceptible CJ!OUps (see ·cons11mption Scorn' aboVl!J_

Brief tnl!!rvention - feedback of AUDIT and harm reduction ildvK:e may be

sufficient Ideally also:

setting goals and limits a mouvational interview

- self-monitoring of drinking use of "The Right Mii" self-help guide

Counsellill(I may Ile required

lliief lnle!wnlion (all cornpcoents) is a minimum requiremert Assessment for more inteosive interiention Crrnselling using CBT jlinciples m rnotivauonal ifllJ'liewlng in individual ses>1ons aml/or in !fOOps Follow-up an~ referral wt1ITT nec1?Ssary.

FUllher 1>Sessement prek'lably 1rx:IUding ram1ly .!fllJ Slgllilicar' othm. Mnrn !n1eos1ve counserl'ng and/or group progia111 C011S11Jer mterral lrl medical o- o;pec1allst sel'llCl!S for W1rt1dr;w,.~ rrnmgcmmt. Pharn'ilwheropy to lllilll<H;e cravinqs. Rclap'f.) prl'Vl~niun. ionqer 1crrn lo11ow-l1p ;n•J suppo~


WIT.0028.0004.0058

Appendix 3

ScrHnln1 Tool Dom•ln - DUDIT

Client - IJemuH drug UH can al/Kt your health and can interfere with certain med/cotton•

and t111atmenta, it i• important that we aak 11am• quntian• about yaur .,,. af drug•. Your

an.wen w/11 r.main confidential within th• Subatance MiauH Service, .a plea•• be honert. In •vent that then re111/t. nnd to u 1har.d.,. part of your cor. plan, we will dlscuu with you

why 1harlng /1 nKHsary, ttek your conHnt to 1har. and a1k you to a/gn a Releatt of

Information Fann. Yau mav 111/uH at anv tlm11 to h11ve then results 1har.d.

M•'-! I F•male( I 0 l 2 3 4 S<or11 Ale( l 1. How often do you Never Once a month 2-4 times 2-3 times 4 times a use drugs other than or less often a month A week week or more

alcohol? Oll}rdlwt Ft"'lffM'l I* ~

2. De you use more Never Once a month 2-4 times 2-3 times 4times a than one type of drug or l@i;s oftl!n a month A week week or more: on the same occasion? often Oll/«fltte: ---3. How many times do 0 1-2 3-4 5-6 7 or more

you take drugs on a

typical day when you 011/«lfw: use drugs? ~pn -4. How often are you Never Less often than Every month Every week Daily or

heavily Influenced by once a month almost daily drugs Oll/«tllte: --5. over the past year. Never Less often than Every month Every week Daily or

have you felt that your once a montli almost dally

longing for drugs was Oll/KflH: so strong that vou OIMaf could not re<lst It?

6. Has it happened, Never Less often than Everv month Every week Daity or over the past vear that once a month almost daily

you hall@ not been •ble 06#ftdw: to stop taking drugs &Ga of alllfrllf once you started? 7. How often o\ter the Never Less often than E11ery month EV<!ryweek Daily or

past year have you once a month almost daily taken drugs and then ~ not done something ,,,.,INfloa., vou should have done? --8. How often over the Never Less oft@n than Every month Every week Dally or

past year have you once a month almost daily

needed to take a drug -


WIT.0028.0004.0059

Appendix 4

FOi' II QUHllOM, plHH tll In the IP!)l'OPfll19 retpOnte cll'de. FHI in the cll'CIM ~ lhil: •

PIHH do not llclc or crou IM clrclH.

In Hie J.JJSl -t W\J uJ..s " Ill ,,, A. ~' '' r .. 11'1 •I \1M' ol ·''' 'th~ lh< liJT 1h>,. 111111 l lU•' If'> If\ !Ill>. •llh

Aoout haw often did you reel tired out for no !IQod reMOn? 0

2. About how often did you fell neNOu1? 0-0-0-0-0 3. About how often did you feel so nervous

that nothing could calm you down?

4. About haw often did you feel hopeless?

5. About hiJW often did you feel reallBl!s ar Rdgety? 0-0- 0-0

6. About how olllm did yoo fael ao rfl8tl98& you could not alt atlll? 0-0-0-0-0

7. About how oltlln did you f9al depressad?

8. About how often did you lael that e\18rything Wll6 an efftK1?

9. About how oltlln did you feel IC sad that nothing could chear you up?

10. About how often did you feel worthlna?

TOO.v'sda OJ rn I I I I I Veu

r._•1tet_....;•yt1•"-~·10llffl~ .11"1ct~~~.;.JndJl~11104..hor1gwamH1lotO..~nl Jt.1rlfurwl,.11>11r1lhill ~WJJe(llfllOOI :nt.m.i .. '1utJltitul8 kw priofe11ima• medic,. Jd>«a. d19Qm* G' WOllrn•iW NCC to btl u..i kit~ci.lll 1JUrpoc.M •"'d rial ICJ b• t1oUld ~cin~.-llde~thelllldD~l._~.,ellilile M'tlf.Jll •


WIT.0028.0004.0060

e Appendix 5

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

CONDITIONS OF CONTACT, ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAMS

INFORMED CONSENT FORM FOR DETAINEES

1. I un.-rstand that i111ues I diSGUu in the assessment, group program and/or individual S9S8ion will remain confidential wllt1 ltle fellowing exceptioo11:

a) If ii 11 determined ll'lat my life i& in danger or that I plan 1o hurt myself or others, staff have a duty to repon ltU to the appropriate authorities.

b) I understand that staff i1WOlved in asse56111en1, group programs, iooividual Se&6io111; or g.,,.rally providing support will consult witti other relevant stoff 81.lCh as Medical Servioe1, Forensic Mental Health Smiices, Commuriity Corrections Olloers, NT Police, AJcatiol and Drug Services, Edua!lloo statl', Ille Parole Board and Santenoo Management, regarding any issues affecting my treatment. Reports may atao be provided to the Parole Boerd and other relevant bodies such as the Courb.

c) I LJnderstBl'ld that, by law, the staff member may be required to report details of spec:Wic crimes. put or propoHcl. that .,.. dllclOMd by me dunng contact.

2. I understand that my sultabilltv for receiving trMtment or support m111'9quire me to undertake an assessment, which may Include psychometric testing. In line with profenlonll p111Ctice. all Identifiable nfonn.a!lon 'Nill rema n confidential wilhln lh• Umita of confidentiality ldenllfled.

3. If I am deemed 1uable for programa. individual seuiona or 1upport, I IX!denstand that participation la voluntMy. 111 chOOle to wittld111W from r.ceMng trNtment. I undentand lhat the Caae Management Aue98/Tlent and Throughcare Service (CMATSI v.411 need lo reauen my suitability l*ore treatment can be racommenced. I understand that If I decline to pilrtlclp.te in treatment leMc•. or withdraw from ll'Ntmen1 Hrvicea, tt111t this could impact on things such 111 my clessiflcalion status arid perole decisions.

4 If I am deemed aultable for programe, individual sesaiona or support, I understand that CMATS la 1'8qUlred lo maintain record& detailing any asuumenl/treatmenllsupp0f1 181Vice prollided.

s. I agree and underatand ttlat ~rams, individuill easiona or support encompilal a number of techniques and methods such• counHlling, practical exerciHa .,,d homework and lhat I will be expected lo undBl1ake thees.

6. I lgl'M that d•indentified pert0nal information from my asse66rnent. treatment and ,._ offending data may be llored and u11d for program evaluaticn and reaaarch purpa.ea.

------ -----------Detllnee (Print n.,,e) DelalnH (Slgnatura)

Witness (Print name) Witness (Slgn.iure) Date

lnterwirei.r Uud v .. No


24

)

WIT.0028.0004.0061

D!CUNI! FORM !'Oil DeTAINU.I

I, _______________________ lldvise

I do not wiah lo participate In the aaseaament for treatment programs

Reaaon gNen:

I do ncit wish to partlcipalll In the program ror whicti I Ml 1aheduled

) Ralon giwn:

Nlilme af Pnigram(1) __________________ _

Detainee (Print n1me) Dat.inee (Signmture} Date

_) 'Mtneaa (Print name) \MlnMs (Signature) Date

lnterprwtor Ueecl v .. No

25


WIT.0028.0004.0062

Appendix 6

YLS/CMI 2.0 "'ay Robert D. Hoge, Ph.D .. D. A. Andrews, Ph.D., & Alan W. Leschicd, Ph.D

Gund~r: D M 0 F

S!ll1iny: n <'.ommunity ncuslodinl

DAio or Blrito: I Today's Diiie: _/

Part I: Assessment of Risks and Needs Tho YLSICMI 2.0 • is <1 quanlltallvo sueenlny llurvuy or illtrlbutes ol juvenile ottendars and thoir silw1tiu111. rE1ievii11l lu d11c;1sion~ r1t1111rdiny lvvlll of Sllrvi,u. 5upervi5iun , and proyramminy. Wilh111 11ach subsi;al~ . UH •n "X" lo mark all l!ems that flpply lo the juvenile being 11s~essed If the s11h~c11lc I!! consfdcrcd to he nn 11ree af strength for tho ju~enllo .

indiwlte wilh a Gl1ed1mark I iri thu 'S4ron11ll1' bul\. The illtmi; aro 0xµl,;iinod in Appondix A of the Uiur·~ Manual. For any omllled Items, circle lhe ilem letler_

1. Prior and Current OffonGOO/Olcpoaltlane:

•· Thr9e or 111an1 11nor convlctlon1 b. Two or more failures to comply c. Pila f)(Ol)adon d PriOf CU SI Ody e. Thfc or more current oorwto ons

2. Family Clrcurnatance!l/Panintlno:

a. . lna<lequat aupervlllcn b. Diffic:ulty in conlrolling behavior

C. lnepprop~ate OJI~~

d. lnc:onal:1111111 p11r ntlng e. P rot Ilona (lnlfief-youlh) t. Poor relBlloml (mother-youth)

Stmiglh

3. Edtlcatlon/EmploW"rnent:

•· l;li""PIM b11h11vior b. 0111'\Jpl!W! behavior on llChOOI

~rly

c, I.Ow achievement d Problema wtltl peern

•• Probl81Ti&'Mlh'l8 rs f. Truancy O· Unemployed/not eaelllng ~t

f r I

Str'Mlglh 0 4. Peer Rel11tlone:

-a.: some d,lllnqutit'. n b. some delinquent friendll c. Nollow. po ll!Ye ~ d No/few po9itl\le friends

Soun;e(&) ol lnfvrmatlcm;

Comment• :

Soun:e(s) of Information:

Comment•:

Source(•I ol Information:

Comments:

Sourc1(1) of infomi1tion:


WIT.0028.0004.0063

)

YLS/CMI 2.0'" By Robert C. Hoge. Ph.D., C. A. Andrews, Ph.D .. & Alan W. Leschled, Ph.D.

Within eec:h sublcale. use In")(' IO m.rk 1111 i lurns lh• apply lo U.. JUVUniht ti.ing 11d. II the sub&eal9 ii IXllllllrl red ID be 1111 RraB ol str ngth for 1ne juvl!nlle. lndlctne with a checkmalk .t In the "Strength" boK For any omitted Items, drde the it11m letter.

Part I: Aaseument of Risks and Needs (Continued)

5. Substance -bUM: Comments:

onll rug uae

~ b. Ciwnie drug UH

c. ctl'Onlo 1l;uhcih• d. Substance ebuee interferea wiltl life louroe(a) of lnfommlon: .. Subltlnce u. lrUd lo olfef1M(1)

Siren~ n 8. L.Maur'1/Rocro tlon: Comn'Mmts:

II. IJmll9d orglnlzed ectJ11n1n 6 b Could make belter use at time 0. No pereonal lnlerMts Sourae(1) of information;

Strengttl D 7. Personallly/Behlvtor: Commelllle:

e. lnOOI IS BBlf.aatellln b Phy61Clllly aggreGl!lvo c. 'nlnlrums d. Short illtenlion span .. Poor fr"elnllion l*rancv ScJura(•J Of lnrormetkln: I. lnadequelll gult r..llngs g, V.m.ly agg ve, Impudent

S!Nnglh n 8. Attilud811f0rl9nt.elon; Commenta:

Anlleoei.llpro=rtmlnel ettlrud11

~ b Nat seeking help c. Actlwtly rejeCJt fng help d Del!Oll aulllorlty e. CelJou&. 11111e ccmcem ror others Sou~(•) of Information:

Strwngth LJ


WIT.0028.0004.0064

YLS/C:MI 2.Q"' By Rob9rt 0. Hoge, Ph.D., D. A. Andrews, Ph.D., &Alan W. Lesd11ed, Ph.D.

Pari II: Sumn111ry of Rl•lw and Nnd9 Gtoedc tile nrsr llNo flll{)Cll ol the MIM!ssment for omlfled (elided~ ilelm II more than four (4) nom se omitted. Ille IHI llhould btt corl8idll<lld invdd, iind m1.1111 inlo111><1llo11 should be oblalned bttlora BCOling. Sum ltie total number of lt8m8 rrak8d wHh an "X" within each subscale and mark the risk/need leYel for ead'I. Then tum the number o1 Xs in Cokimn A and In Column El. Uae lh11 oombinlid total kl compl&ta lhe Ollerall Total Soor11 al the boltom ol lf'le pag11, whir.Ii is uRlld to rA>mplllt11 Iha Total Rl&lrJNeed Le11el box. Checkmerlul in lhe box!IS 181 led "S" fnd!Uta a siren~. The table below i;an ba used far 1 summary

-~ - - lub-. ~Iii.., Ptn....mit .... .., EllJMiian p- - fle<n B- orte-

-Strmplll

Column A Column B

1. Pr1lll" nnd Curre"' OfMnlMUllD1111114'llHiv1t1

LJ I. Subatanoe Abuae Total Ri.IU"-l Lr.I•

RllllllNead Level:

J Low(O) D RiahlNHd IAwl: Custodial Mele: Moderate (1·-2) r ·i Low(O) D 0 Low (l>-19) High (3-51 u Mod9rale (1-2) D 0 f\Aoderete (20 2 9)

~~ Higl'l {3-5) fl 0 H Jgh {3()-.36) ,,, .. n . ' 0 Very High (37 -42) ~~ n 2. FamllJ Clr"umal~ncn,,.amltl11g 8. Leleurelbcreatlon Cuslodlel FemBlu:

D 0 Lill!i (()..19)

Rt.klNaed l.llvel: RlaklNaed t..wl: 0 Moderale (20- 29) - 0 0 High (3r>-36} £1 Low (0-2) 0 LDW (0)

p Modelate (3-4) 0 Modenile (1J D 0 V«y High (37--42)

l-1 High (2·-3) u J Htgti (&-6) 0 Commuolly Mal&:

n 7. Per110nelltvlBehllYlor D LDw (Cl--9)

u 0 Modarete (1~21)

L LI R lekJ~d level: Cl High {22--31} .. " l w (Dl IJ LI l/efY Hlgl\ (32 .... 2)

~ ~ 3. EducmtlonlEmployment •'Al>d ""' (1--4) u

~~ Rt.It/Need l.9Y94: High(~ 7) 0 Community Fernele:

H LJ Cl LOW (0-8) H Low (0) 0 Moderate {9-19) o"9.i Mllderllte ( 1 ·3) O Cl lgh {20-28)

I# Higtl [4-7) D D 0 l/ery High (29__.2)

H 8. AttltudH/OrianlaUon ....

~~

LJ ~ ~ IUKklN9MI ln•I: -1 Low(O} 0 L D ~'

Modllrate (I 3) 0 ii 4. PMr Rwl.UOna High (4-5) n H RWl/Naed L•val:

il ~ low{()..1) [I 141'": Modurutu (2-3) O H Ht!Jh (4) LJ .~ D l... !

rl'J

= D+D I

~ I

Ill Column A CoMnnll YLS/CMI 2.0 Tlllml Tol81 Tc>lill ICI0'9


)

28

WIT.0028.0004.0065

YLS/CMI 2.Q"' By Robert D. Hoge, PhD., D. A. Andrews, Ph.D, & Alan W Leschied, Ph.D.

Part Ill: As9essment of Other Needs nd Speclal Consldenrtlons

1. Femlly/P•enta O Chro'11c Hl3cory al Often~11s 0 Em<>bonAI Ooolnn!l/Psychiel n( 0 DrugrAloohol Abl.15~

0 FiMnciallAcoammndllllOlll f>robl~ms 0 AhlJ:!lve Molh ftr

0 Unc~el..,. Parenho 0 CulbnllF.lhnic 1•$08$ 0 AbUliive Father

O!lryroficmnt Fam~ T••IA'll• (sp..,.~i ·

0 Oth"r [$pecily): 0 Marital Confkl

Cammon ts :

2. Youth 0 LHrrWi~ lily 0 Advef911 I. .Wig Con<i~~

u Anxilllls 0 Gang ln,olveU Gmdar I~~ 0 Law lnlelll!)lnCl!I IJAY<!iopl!IMW

0 Sejf.f.Aanagement 5kll• O SllyllMtMrnwn

0 Communication Prnbl.,ns O Cruelly lo Mmllll• 0 cunural/Ellnc Issue& 0 Oepreosed 0 Diagr-'s o/ Cond1."t Di'""*'

Oppoi;lllo11al 0Gflalll Dl8oruet 0 Oiagoollis ol Paycho6i& 0 Engogc11 In DenlAI 0 FOIOI Alcohol Spo!CUum o laomor

(FASO) 0 FiNwlcoaVAttommnM!inn

Problem&

0 fie811h Probi9m• 0 HKlmy al .........ii on A<Jlhoril\'

Fl~urK 0 Hialory of BuflySig 0 Hkilory CJf Escapu 0 HIGIOIY of FlrU Selling 0 Hlslory al RuMinQ Awny 0 History nl Se>lu~llPhy>ilcaf

Ae~llUll 0 1-ll!llory of WMpOM UM 0 lnRl'fl'optlAI• Se~IJAI Arlivoty

Delay 0 low s..tf-E.i-n 0 fv1slipuleli11e 0 Parnnllng l1111Uas 0 Poor& OuiGlde Auo Rango 0 PN)'81Clill DllBbllly 0 Poor Problem-Solving Sti Ho 0 Pl)QI' .~nclAI S kl• 0 Prcgnoncy lsoues 0 Proledlon !Mu~ 0 RAcist!Se-.il1 Allrlud~•

Comm«ll~ : (Nale any specoal cullU1aUethn ic or gendllf·relaled responsMty oonslderati006)

Part IV: Final RiskJNeed Level and Professional Override

0 Sulcidltl ld .. tionlAltampl•"' Seff-lnjUIJI

0 Third Par1y Ttireal 0 UnderllchMmlmenl O \llcllrn ol Bull)'Wi11 0 \llcllm ol NllljleCI 0 \llcti111 al Phy&lc31/Sexual l\buse 0 \MIMI!& ot Domusllr. Vlolenr.f! 0 OtNer Montd Heeltll l811uoe

(~ 1m'jry Ml<llN l O Oth8r 1!11'8CtlY below)

fakmg into acwut•I all avaRablo lntonnallon. provld0 you1 06lln1ale <Jf ltltJ rlsl<. lcuol tor lhls cci~e II your risk cstlrnntlon dllfers lroni lhlll o1 the Inventory. pie ~ prnvidn rn ~t'l n$ why.

P.irt II •

Ros k, N'l<l<l L•v~f

n low 0 Met1ora10 0 iliqh C 'Jory 1·1i!,itt

~MllS :.:· .... I 11 I •

' ~ ,, f . . ....

U'•" thr u1vll!l abl01to1 I i>vurncJu 7

\I ',. I \.' •I •

U Yes n No

'I •• •1 •" 1 I ...

h ...


F r n~I Vi 51C:M: 2 0 . RhiklNu11u L~v.,r •

U Low [l Mortfll(11fl u fl1l,lti i1 \Jnry High

,.. •1

'"' ' • a i. .. It

29

WIT.0028.0004.0066

y LS/CMI 2.0'"Case Management IZllll!lll!E:mllllllllCl:lll:lllmlD By Robert D. Hoge, Pti.D., D. A. Andrews, Ph.D., & Alan W. Leschiad, Ph.D.

r NMie of At"1Md:. _____ _

SetUng: D CClmmunily DCu too' I

Data of BirH1: __ 1 __ 1 __

Part V: ProgramlPlacament Decision Coint:ilet• V. 1 rot CUSIDdl., Voulh and V.2 for community youth.

V.1 Custodial

Reccmmendalion/Decislon

Roloa o R . commend d

Custodl I PW:einent

Commenhi:

V.2 Community

Recom"*ldallon/Dec:illlon

Prognim Plllcement

Comment&:

D AdminialraliYe/Paps D l\Alnlmt.m Supervision D M..:lium Supervi1ion D llAIXimum Supervision

DNo DY&.!

C Admini1trabve/Paper a MWmum Supel\'lslon a Mldkr'1 Supervision 0 Maximum Supervision

Probadon Offloer's SlgnatureJDale

Gender: 0 M Cl F Age: ___ _

Today's Date: __ / __ / __

Supervisor's Signature/Date


)

WIT.0028.0004.0067

)

)

YLS/CMI 2.(fCase Management By Robert 0. Hoge, Ph.D .. D.A.Andrewa, Ph.D., &Alan W. Leschlecl, Ph.D

Gender: 0 llil D F Ag11· .. --

Selling: o Commurntv OCusSOdilll

Dale crt B1r1h: ___ / __ I _____ _ Today's Oeti&: ___ I _ __ / __

Pert VI: C•• Management Pla11 A. CrlmlnOglNC ~ {rank ord.r)

1.

2.

3.

4.

S. Othef CU.nt Non-Cflmlf1011enlc Nt d:s "-quiring Altefltlon (tri orde'1

Orner Nt ('dt r GQat l ri tetvcntlon ! fin11 r r.imo

1.

2.

3.

4.


WIT.0028.0004.0068


Appendix 7

CASE PLAN

D!Ml.., lrlltl }IXlll1 pemin, e&e mMaget, llClnlllllNr CM8Cflans • respct1$11Jlo adlll/gulll'dltln CIAMll D9ar. DCF, ed!aHrln 01._ ~ mivldlJllVtigorcy • nomlnllfed !I)! lie )OUl111 paf!M.

Detainee Details

Name: Data of Birth: UIS: Case Manager: Location: The Don Dale Youth Detention Centre I Alice

Springs Yooth Detention Centre Data of Plan: Review Date: Leaal Sbltus: Remand/Sentenced Next Court/Parole ReviewlOiacharae Date: YLS..CMI outcome: ~

O\letvlew r:l Ille ainillogariic .relevn 111 ttw young Pll10l'I

LowJModerate/HlahNerv High

CASE PLAN Part A- Crlmlnoeenlc Needs

Be ipeCMll:-.. Lllttht lllllmMJon 1Mlo It mponeibl9 !Qr SMART goals recommended and how c.i~ tru

ll'lil wiil be ICiw..d Haw wll M be monl!ONd? Superviion, oamms mallltnga, e11e coor.r-•

""*' dldlwlll the l......,...on __

allll llow ID• wtl It go for?


)

WIT.0028.0004.0069

)

)


CASE PbAN Part B - Non-Crlmlnogen!c Needs

UllloNHaf~ -- Be-lfte-uae l.Jst,,,.l_llcn IMloi.-nlibler..r -.dlcUldllhe SMART~ rw<0mn.ndod ..a how dollwliny -ent lnt.,.tftllon -..monco

o...;.wo11ha crtmlnog•nlc noed -...ntlDl/\9young pal80n

du.will~~ --ID"llWfllltgofOr'I

e.g. ACCOllODATION

~AMI. Y CONNECTIONS

EDUCATIONI EMPLOYIENTI TRAINING

~TH

FINANCES

CULTURE AND IDENTITY

OTHER(e.g. I parentl ng etc)

WE UNDERSTAND .AND AaME Willi TtfC9 CAii! PL.AH; ! .......... Young P•nwn

.i~naturo

I '--

How wit ~ ... '""'*>red? &Jparvtolon, aim"" rneelllgo, CAM

contonncm *·

Aborigl,,... Cultu,_, ~ I Tnml..Nder

IS111n•u,.


WIT.0028.0004.0070


Appendix 8

Step-Up Program (for Youth)

The Step-Up Program is a psycho-educational program appropriate for young people on remand or short orders, as well as young people who are serving a sentence, who have been involved in violent or aggressive behaviour. The program gives participants opportunities to examine situations, thoughts and behaviours that have led to violent and aggressive behaviour, and to develop and practice strategies to deal with these issues in a pro-social manner. The program includes modules that address problem areas empirically related to violence and reducing violent behaviour. It utilises a range of methods that have been shown to reduce recidivism. The program is delivered in a closed format and it is structured to be delivered over a 4-6 week period in detention or 5 full days in the community. Assessment for the program (pre and post testing) using the VRS-YV tool.

Program Modules 1. Welcome, Introduction to the Program 2. Me. Mv familv!kin and Relationships 3. Understanding Violence and Making Change 4. Understanding warning signs and taking time out 5. Understanding Power & Understanding feelings

and Jealousy 6. Understanding Thoughts/Beliefs & Hurtful and

He/pf ul moves 7. Accountabilitv & Responsibilitv 8. Understanding Other People 's Feelings: Empathy 9. Making amends 10.Assertive communication & Respectful Communication when you have a conflict 11. Problem Solving 12. Moving Forward

34

)

WIT.0028.0004.0071

Safe Sober Strong Program (for Youth)

The Safe, Sober, Strong Program aims to provide clients who are on remand or serving short sentences an opportunity to participate in an intervention. Longer term sentenced clients can benefit from participation in the program because it provides an introduction to the therapeutic environment with the aim to facilitate readiness and motivation for change in clients prior to participation in more intensive programs. The Safe, Sober, Strong Program uses a Cognitive Behavioural approach to increase client awareness of offending behaviour, and to provide strategies that enhance pro social thinking and goal setting.

Program Modules: 1. Welcome 2. Understanding me 3. Getting ready to chance 4. Managing emotions: Anger 5. Managing emotions: Jealousy, Loneliness 6. Managing emotions: Stress 7. Problem Solving 8. Thinking about crime 9. Other people's feelings 10.My future 11. Me and my people 12. Me and my community: Safe from grog and drug sickness 13. Alcohol, drugs and me 14. Staying safe 15. Family fighting.

The program modules focus on specific problem areas that are related to recidivism. Each module is comprised of psycho educational information about the specific area of functioning, and specific strategies and skills to identify and address problems. Sessions provide information that will help the participant to learn Cognitive Behavioural Therapy methods for understanding their thoughts and behaviours in relation to specific problem areas and offending behaviour. It will also provide change skills and strategies based on basic Cognitive Behavioural techniques.


WIT.0028.0004.0072

Changing Habits and Reaching Targets (CHART) (for Youth)

The CHART Program is an offending behaviour change program designed to Change Habits and Reach Targets to reduce the risk of further offending. Chart is designed to increase a young person's understanding of the values and beliefs that underpin their offending behaviour. The aims of CHART include: providing an evidence-based practical resource for working one-to-one with young people, to provide a program that is directly relevant to key criminogenic needs, to use a problem-solving framework of assessment, objective setting, action and evaluation as a key change process, to provide a user-friendly program that recognises young people's rights and responsibilities, and to be a portable resource for use with young people when in the community and custody.

Program Modules: 1. Mapping my Offences 2. Motivation to Change

Q 3. Thinking and Behaviour 4. Problem-solving 5. Lifestyle Balance 6. Relapse Prevention 7. Healthy Relationships 8. Violence 9. Motor Vehicle Offending 10. Drugs and Alcohol 11. Living Independently 12. Education and Work


WIT.0028.0004.0073

Love Bites (for Youth)

19VE BiTES Love Bites is a well-established respectful relationships program that focuses on domestic and family violence, and sexual assault prevention for 15 to 17 year olds. Love Bites is based on best practice standards for educational programs as recommended by the Federal Government funded Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearing House and other leading academics in the area of violence against women. Love Bites consists of two interactive education workshops on Domestic and Family Violence and Sexual Assault followed by creative workshops and community campaigns. The program is delivered by trained facilitators within Northern Territory Department of Correctional Services and staff from external agencies such as the Police, who have been trained as Love Bites facilitators.

The Love Bites Program at Don Dale Youth Detention Centre covers nine core components:

1. Introduction and Exploring Relationships 2. Thinking about Relationships 3. Loves me Loves me not 4. Myths, Gender and Relationship Violence 5. Abusive Behaviour and Being a Bystander 6. Definitions of Sexual Assault 7. Consent 8. Sex and Relationships 9. Relationship Rights and Responsibilities

• Yov {JQ.!ol T ~ WW-'f' ltiE"~ ''.kl•·~~!


WIT.0028.0004.0074

Guiding Circles (for Youth)

"The Guiding Circles is a very interesting, extremely effective and unique technique in discovering the career goals for our Aboriginal youth" (John Marshall, Membertou First Nation)

Guiding Circles addresses three factors:

• Employment Gap

• Self-Awareness Gap

• Cultural Gap.

The program is developed in Canada and considered culturally appropriate for the high population of Indigenous youth in NTDCS detention centres. It is currently facilitated by the Aboriginal Cultural Advisor and Case Management Staff.


)

WIT.0028.0004.0075

DAISY Drug and Alcohol Program (for Youth)

The DAISY program is provided by CatholicCare NT and aims to support young people who are affected by drugs and alcohol and their families by providing information, counselling and case management. It also aims to reduce the incidence and uptake of substance use amongst young people in Darwin, Palmerston and the rural areas and to increase community knowledge of the issues for young people who use drugs and alcohol and increase the community's capacity to respond to these issues. DAISY operates within a harm minimisation model and believes that a respectful, supportive and empathic relationship is important for young people.

The DAISY program runs within the school day within Don Dale Youth Detention Centre for all youth, and on an individual basis for youth with more complex and high needs substance use issues.

CatholicCare NT


WIT.0028.0004.0076

Individual Violence Program (for Youth)

The Individual Violence Program (!VP) commenced in Youth Justice in February 2015. The IVP is an evidence-based intervention designed to target violent offending behaviour. It is provided to young people with a history of serious violent offending, and is delivered in an individual format. It is based on international best-practice principles and has the capacity to be individualised to the needs of each participant. The program aims to, reduce violence and aggression through increased selfawareness, improved mood management strategies and relapse prevention techniques.


)

)

WIT.0028.0004.0077

)

Individual Sexual Offending Program (for Youth)

The Youth Sexual Offending Program (YSOP) commenced in Youth Justice in June 2015. The YSOP is an evidence-based intervention designed to target sexual offending behaviour in youth. It is provided to young people with a history of sexual offending, and is delivered in an individual format. It is based on international bestpractice principles and has the capacity to be individualised to the needs of each participant.

The program offers practical ways of understanding sexual offending, including helping participants take responsibility for their offences, and assisting them with developing appropriate strategies to avoid re-offending.


WIT.0028.0004.0078

Appendix 9

Client#: -----------

Pre·Trl:lllme111 R.l•r: -------- Pre-Treatment Raring Date: ----

Poat- frc tmcnt Raline Olk: -----POii-Treatment Rater: ------

81

82

83

S4

VRS:YV Score Sheet Stable acton

Early Onm of Serious Antilccial Bdurvion Criminality

lmtability ofF1111ily Upbrinsins

lixpaliurw lo Antis~iaJ Behavicr in thu Family

Tolal Stable Fador San before Trma..all

Total tobJe Factor. core aftlr Trul eat:

(only if there ue chimps to SI or S5)

0

0 0

0

2 J

2 J

2 J

2 3

' /'fl/ II 11ffl'umy /D -11 ra11111aSta1Hr '"DynmrHc Fnmr. tfN ,.,,.. shoM/d indicir# .,Jwllwr tJw

lllllllulrm '8 liwC8N th- la ilul4/lkl- l orma1/ot1 (/) or ._ tlw llUI ~ llOf appl/roblt! (NJ.


42

WIT.0028.0004.0079

)

FOR STAGI OF CHANGE: PJC '" P..un1tmplllllonlCun1tmpltdon t P .. Pr p111111l n

UH lllHf' IJ•ltl* ID lndir.UI tile Sf .tC:h 1~1 0 • l're-ll't"41m m x - Po«·lfaflnCM

ti _,SI• · dlllngeil: 11110-,e ~ 0 lafllF -.5

A ~l\Glion 2 ~· - 1.0 M•Mautcllll'ICC hi Q - 1.5

DYNAMIC FACTORS D TOTAL SCQRES

DI

m w D4

DS

06

D7

Vlclent UfeRyle

Callous llld Unemotional

Criminal Attituda

Attitudm tDMrcl P.dUQCion

AntillDCial Pan

hl&erpc.'fSOflol Aggnwaion

B!Mdonal COllllOI

RATINGS

Pre- Stage or "el Chan~e

0 2 3 P/C P A M

23 PICPAM

23 PfCPAM

0123 P!CPAM

0

0

0 1

0 I

0

23 PfCPAM

23 P/CPAM

23 P/CPAM

l.S

l.S

1.5

l.S

l.S

1.5

l.S

D8 Violcnu Dwina loi&l1utionaJi7;atioo 0 :Z P/C P A M 1.5

23 PICPAM U

0 .s 0

-' 0

.s 0

.5 0

.s 0

.s 0

.s 0

.s 0

.s 0

.s 0

.s 0

.s 0

.s 0

.s 0

.S 0

09 Weapon Use 0

DlO In ight into Violence 0 2 3 P/C P A M 1.S

Dt 1 Mental Disorder 0 2 J P/C P A M l.S

012 Substmec Abu11e

Dtl lmpulsMry

01" Cophive Diatortiona

Dl5 lmcmtion witb Careaivcn

D16 Family Sha

DI 1 Social l9Clation

Dll Community Stability

DI 9 Compliance with Supcrvisicn

lnA:au U' CIWeal <Mrrtde 1'1UUlllllh

v .. 0 No 0

0 l 3 P/C P A M l..S

0 2 3 P/C P A M 1.5

0 2 J P/C P A M 1.5

0 2 3 PJC P A M 1.5

0 2 3 PJC P A M l.S

0

0

0

2 P/C P A M l.S .5 0

3 P/C P A M l.S .5 0

M I. 0 E- TDlll Dynam.ic F1ctor ~

Score ~ Total Stable r~tor ~

re Fron1 Pre¥1nus P •c iE-- Tola.I Shible + T•11id _.

nm111lc FKtor o~

Fill n_pu,,_, ..,.:ti) ""1<111a111o ,lie,., is• " " .c..-,....,-..., ... 1. , 10> ... .-11x>• P u 't.".,... rw ptf · .-;d p;tJf • • '~ • \'

" I 1'1cto • Jloi<ft(lfllll <fwllllt "l lt/Wl'I. We ..., _ ill 111111:1llJ1le •1• - ilf N ~"'' D\'lllllllC ~.


WIT.0028.0004.0080


Slllff memb~r nem~:

Month:

VLS·Ct.11 ASSESSMENTS

CASI PlAl'G/OMPS

CHART PARTIOPANTS

OFRHDER PROGRAM$/GROUPS

INSTITUTIONAL REPORTS

F

CMATS STATIS11CS FORM

Appendix A: Direc:tive 3.4.4 Case Management and Throughcare Services Manual

Appendix 10

j

44

WIT.0028.0004.0081

)


NAME:

UIS:

D.O.B:

LOCATION:

REPORT DATE:

REPORT WRITIEN BY:

Institution I Report Yoatll JUltkc

(CONFIDENTIAL)

Appendix 11

Tlrtr r •port reflects opinilJllS lHlll rer:o111mt111datinns based on infermalifNI IJWJilablB at the dattt of writing. The report Is therefore 1fOI volfdjor aue '" tlTe nenJ of ubs qW111 re-offending.

Court Oate/s:

OtTcnces;

PURPOSE OF R.IPORT

e.a 29.03.2i>l6

e.g Aggrovuted Robbery Attempted Robbery Reck less Endangerment of Police Officer

Low/Medium/Hip

The lnstitutionlll Report is desipcd to deKribe X' (use deulinee·s ftNI name) 11-cnc I conduct and

behaviour during lhc current episode In dctcnlion.

GENT.RAJ. CONDUCT

Genmlll Attitude ·r~anl1 Detention

Inter ct n1 ft'ida Stan' 1111d Otlter Detalnea


WIT.0028.0004.0082

Self-Mau.i;emeat Skills (e.g. how youth deals wilh stress or problem& that ari~e - do they have

adequate coping strategics 10 deal with stress/problems? List these. If not, how do !hey r p nd to

slre - verbal abuse, violence, self-harm. witlldrawaJ liom others. Try and provide an example

here)

Complla•c:e wltb Centre Rulc1 and Dtrectloa1 from Stafl'

Gcneml stalcmcnt about compliance, and lhen:

Over the current custodial period the youth had a total of x incident reports . These

included:

Date Incident type

7 January 2016 Detainee showing hostile behaviour & threalening to smash TV

28 December 20 I 5 Paly fighting and l.hreatt.'fling to punch staff

24 December 201 S speaking lo staff in a bad manner and having bad attitude

towards staff and being non-compliant

22 December 2015 Swearing nt smfT

17 December 20 IS Possession r contraband a while board marker

3 December 2015 Refused to follow instructions and threatening staff

29 November 2015 Talk f escape multiple detainee involved

TREATMENT NEE.I).§ ASSESSMENTS

The YLS/CMI is a standardixd measure of factors I.bat cun be used to classify young offenders and

aid case manag m nt. Based on empirical predictors of general criminal conduct in youth, the

YLS/CMI includes eight domains or areas of '"need", in regard to treatment and manaacment The

YLS/CMI also identiflcs relative strengths and responsivlty considerations.

X's lo&al score on 1hc YLS/CMI W9S in the k>w/modcnte/high/very hiHb ni=eds range:. This

indicated thal X requin.'d o low/moderule/bi&}Vvery biih level of intervention, lo assist him/her with

reducing offending behuvi ur. # areas were considered to be of high need (priorlcummt offences,

family circumstances/parenting, cducatioo/employment, peer relations, and substance abU:IC), #

areas were considered to be of medium need (leisure/recreation., personality/behaviour. and

attitudClil'orientation) and # areas were considered lo be of low need. The areas of need listed above

constitute trcatmcnl and management considerations. Resp nsivity needs and special considerations

46 Appendix A: Direc:tive 3.4.4 Case Management and Throughc:are Services Manual

WIT.0028.0004.0083

)

)

Included X's e.g. family issues, low ~elf-esteem, poor pmblem solving skills, tendency to be shy or

withdrawn. and difficulties managing his emotions. II is r«ommende<i that these areas be lllkcn into

account when delivering trentmmt und intervention to X.

Nole if HY other 11uc11mnib complded such a1 SAVRY (for violence) or ERASOR (for

sexual offending).

Based on the level of need identified ebove, X was found suitable for participation in :

List interventions recommended:

CHA!tT

STEP UP

DAISY

lNDIVDUAL TREA lMENT FOR VlOLENT OFFENDING

INlllVDUAL TREATMt-:NT mR st-:XlJAL ()fl."f,NIJINO

COUNSELLING FOR XXX

GUlLDING CIRCLES

LOVE BITES

OTHER PROORAM

PROGRAM PARTlCIPATION

Offending Behaviour Programs

Provide overview of progrnm3 young penon is participating. Overviews cun be found in your

CMA TS procedure manual.

E.a. The CHART Program is an offending behaviour change program designed to Change Habits and

Reach Targets to reduce 1he risk of further offending. CHART is designed to increalie a yoWlg

person's undcrstandinw of the values and beliefs that underpin their otfendina behaviour.

Eltller X conm1c:nc1.'t1 the CHART proiiram on X (oult!). To dale helshe has attended ii number of

week.1)1 se!lSions. !hen describe engagem~nl.

OR X bas been placed on the waitlist to conunence (I IART ;md it is anticipated that this progrnm

wlll cc;mmcnc~ in Month :Wl6.

t:d1u:atio11aaliF.n1pklynu:11l Prn1r-.r'5

Describe school .:nsagcmcnt


WIT.0028.0004.0084

Other ProanmiJ (delete If not ttqulrcd):

Balanced Choice

Red Cross

Art

HEAL TH AND MEDICAL ISSUF.S

Mental Health · describe any mentaJ health osscssmcnts, n:ports. issues, treatment, at risk episodes

while in detention

J>hysical HcaJth - describe any psychical hcahh ·ssmcnts, reports, issues, treatment while in

detention

COMMUNICATION

Telephone calls - Identify who the youth contacts via telephone and how often

Visits - Report whetller the youth receives visits

Mail - Docs the youth regularly receive/write letters to others, have any letters been restricted

VLU infonnatk>n - who has tbe youth received/engaged in VUJs with

SUMMARY

X was dmittcd to DDYDC/ASYDC on xicx. Hc/!'ihe is currently on remand/sentenced for offences

includin; xxx. X's next court <lntc/upcomifl8 parole review date/release date is xxx. Since his

udmission lo OUYDC/ASYOC, X (describe generol conduct). X was assessed as requiring a

low/mockratc/biah/vcry hiah level of intervention to assist him/her with addrcssina his/her

offendins bchavio\D'. X was rccom.t'1'lCJ\dcd fer (insen interventions). He/She bas participatal in

(insert program) fmm x lox 1111'1 (de!«:ribe engagement). Fulure plam~ for X include (e.g. completion

of program, completing school/work, re-engaging with family etc.).

Report prepared by Case Manager Date:

Your Name

Approved by Director Youth Detention: Date:

Victor Williams


)

WIT.0028.0004.0085


Northern Territory Correctional Services Youth Detantion Centre Case Worbr- Cate Noln

DATE Name: ID.O.B:

---

-

- -

-

--

-- -..._

-

___ ._ __ Ensure Md! tntrv hu wortctn Mme identified

j IJIS:

Appendix A: Directive 3.4.4 Case Management and Throughc:are Services Manual

Appendix 12

-

--

49

WIT.0028.0004.0086

e Appendix 13 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

CASE PRESENTATION TEMPLATE

Pore oCD!nh: .Lll5i.

Nest ourt d•le: Pta'--e or r idcDCc: C1&11e M1111n2cr:

Curr nt Off.mCC1: Sp;urity Cla jfi 111ion;

Dem ru hies

P1mmt/G u11rd lam:

Include age, gender, etl'lnicity, living sillJation, circumstances or y()or involvement

Key nndlnp

AUDIT: DUDIT: KIO: Any olhcr assessments: YLS-CMI outcome: Criminogenic needs idenlified!

Baclw.rougd

Give relC\lant history. For example, events lhat happened years ago 11111y help clarify the current situation. or the shwttion may have arisen suddenly without obvious hisloric:al causes.

Forrnulafion

Desaibe your under.itanding of why things are as lhey are. Consider Predisposina factors, prccipicatina factors, pcrpctuatilia factors and protcdivc facton (the 4 P!I)


)

WIT.0028.0004.0087

)

hm

Describe what you hive done amJ what you plan to do about the situation.

Ru 011 Ii r Pr nbtfion

Explain why you selected lhis c:ase. Does it present a uniqtie challenge Ott 111

unusual problem? Docs it illustrate the cffcc:tivem:a of an intervention? Do~ need help with the case, or are you presenting it so others~ learn from your experience?


wit.0028.0004.0037 annexure j'k -6 - royal … · estimate of risk of adolescent sexual...

Documents