william osler health system enterprise risk management an osler perspective our vision is ‘to...
TRANSCRIPT
WILLIAM OSLERHEALTHSYSTEM
Enterprise Risk ManagementAn Osler Perspective
Our vision is ‘to design health systems that serve the global community… driven by diversity’.
Rita vanOosterhout, Director Enterprise Risk & InsuranceSeptember 20, 2010
Background
Etobicoke General Hospital
• 269 beds• 2,607 births• 64,337 emergency visits
• 504 beds• 4,639 births• 85,017 emergency visits
Peel Memorial Hospital
Brampton Civic Hospital
• TBD
• Peel has the second highest volume of new immigrants in the country
• The top home languages include: English, Punjabi, Urdu, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Somali, Gujarati, Tamil, Hindi, and Chinese
• Peel … the child and youth population under 19 years of age is the second highest of any region in the province
Key Facts
ERM Framework
x
HEALTH SYSTEMS THAT SERVE THE
GLOBAL COMMUNITY
Preserve and enhance reputational equity with
internal and external stakeholders.
PATIENTFINANCIAL
PEOPLE
SAFEENVIRONMENT
INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY
LEGAL ®ULATORY
GOVERNANCE
IDENTIFYN
ICATE
RESPOND
MO
NIT
OR
& A
SSESS
& REPORT
CO
MM
U
How To Implement ERM?
Conduct Risk Reviews– To identify key processes, risks, weaknesses,
controls and tolerance– To promote accountability for the
management of key risks while fostering a risk aware culture
Approach– Involve appropriate personnel – Facilitate agreement of the priority of risks
as well as mitigating actions and accountabilities
– Formulate metrics to be used to identify trends/quantify risk
Deliverable & Outcome– Engagement and ownership – Quantification of risk
Other Ongoing ERM Initiatives
• Obstetrical Insured Claims analysis• Large Insurance losses to identify trends and
risk factors.• Critical Adverse Events• Other Serious Incidents
Planned Metrics
Risk Register – For Illustrative Purposes Only
RISK DESCRIPTION IMPACT LIKELIHOODRISK
SIGNIFICANCEPREVIOUS
STATUSCURRENT STATUS RESPONSE RESPONSIBILITY
1
Incorrect service delivery to patients (e.g. medication, specimen source entry)
Major Likely HIGH
FMEA to be performed Patient
2
Insufficient/inadequate capital funding/budget Moderate Remote LOW
Additional scrutiny and rigor applied to approval of capital projects.
Financial
3
Patients are experiencing delayed access to care. Minor Very Likely MEDIUM
Wait times are monitored and units experiencing excessive delays will implement an action plan that will then be monitored.
Patient
4
Catastrophic event at EGH impacting patient, staff and public safety. Major Unlikely MEDIUM
Facility is to be assessed by an independent engineer and an appropriate business case to be made.
Safe Environment