what does the future hold for csp s?

What Does the Future Hold for CSP s?

Martin DavisDirector - Community Safety Information

© 2013

Overview

‘Localisation’/Democratisation of public safety management by the delegation of powers and duties.

What has changed and what hasn’t? Challenges/Opportunities including

Regional co-ordination of crime and disorder reduction

Regional allocation of community safety funding

Potential linkages between local and regional strategic planning

Creation of a CS hierarchy View from the Coal Face

© 2013

The Future is with us!

The most elements of public safety have changed.

CSPs – no longer the heart of public safety partnerships?

PCC as a regional power with strategic duties and functions

© 2013

The Construction of Public Safety

Emergency Planning

CivilEnforcement

Community Services

PoliceService

JusticeServices

Voluntary & Commercial

Providers

Main Stream &Targeted

Funds

Partnership Working

Community Engagement

Strategic & Business Planning

Crime Related Projects &

ProgrammesPrevention

Offender Management

CriminalEnforcement

Public Safety

Direction

Work Areas

Service Providers

© 2013

Where Do CSPs Fit In?

Local PoliceSupport from force Senior Command Team for local crime and disorder priorities

Active involvement of BCU Command Team in partnership

Local Authority Active championing of local crime and disorder priorities

Political support crucial to mainstreaming: usually, support from Council leader and dedicated ‘portfolio lead’

CSP

Shared local public safety agenda (CS Partnership

Action Plan)

Health services

Education services

Probation & YOTs

NGOs & local business

Criminal Justice

partners

Fire services & authority

Police and Crime Commissioner

© 2013

PCCs Key Regional Functions

Aim to cut crime and deliver an effective and efficient police service within the force area by:

1. Holding the chief constable to account for the delivery of the force

2. Setting and updating a police and crime plan

3. Setting the force budget and precept

4. Regularly engaging with the public and communities

5. Appointing, and where necessary dismissing, the chief constable

6. Cooperating with the criminal justice system in their area

7. Working with partners and fund community safety activity to tackle crime and disorder.

And contribute to the national and international policing capabilities set out by the home secretary in the strategic policing requirement

© 2013

PCCs and (CSPs)

Reciprocal duty for PCCs and responsible authorities to co-operate with each other for the purposes of reducing crime and disorder.

PCCs have the following powers and duties relating to community safety

Power to bring a representative of any or all CSPs in their area together to discuss priority issues.

Power to require reports from CSPs about issues of concern.

Power to approve mergers of CSPs on application of the CSPs concerned.

Power to commission community safety work from a range of local partners including, but not limited to, CSPs.

1

2

3

4

5

© 2013

Elemental Changes

The London Model – state of things to come?

The Funding Pie – direction and strategic management?

Local Partnership Action Plans – how will they change?

Community Engagement – whose community (Scarman and Lawrence)

© 2013

London Police Strategic Management(Model)

Mayor’s Office for Policing & Crime

MOPAC Mission

1. Crime Prevention

2. Police Accountability

3. Justice and re-entry

Key success factors are to:

1. Hold the MPS to account and deliver the Mayor’s manifesto commitments and expectations.

2. Challenge the MPS and other criminal justice agencies to deliver value for money for the London taxpayer and address the challenge of fewer resources in the years ahead.

3. Ensure that all of London’s public service agencies work together to prevent crime, seek swift and sure justice for victims, and reduce re-offending.

London Crime Reduction Delivery Board

Purpose The London Crime Reduction Board (LCRB) meets

quarterly with the aim to improve accountability between regional partners through the delivery of an agreed partnership strategic plan.

LCRB priorities July 2012

The LCRB has identified three issues where joint planning and delivery are currently key to London:

- tackling gangs- tackling anti-social behaviour- reducing re-offending (NOMS)

Members Mayor of London: Boris Johnson Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime:

Stephen Greenhalgh London Councils: Mayor Jules Pipe London Councils: Cllr. Claire Kober London Councils: Cllr. Philippa Roe

London Councils: Cllr. Nick Walkley Police Commissioner: Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe

© 2013

2013/14

The Funding Pie

10

2012/13

Local authorities

and to Welsh CSPs

Funding for DIP, community engagement,

crime prevention etc

Continued with 2011/12 NTA

arrangements

PCCs

Police Funding streams

Community Safety Funds

PCCsPCCs

Policing Budget

Substance Misuse

Treatment Budget

H.O. CSP Grants

……but how will the pie be cut from April

2013?

Budget transferred to

Local Authority

Directors of Public Health

© 2013

Local Community Engagement

Section 96 of the Police Act 2006 (as amended by Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011). This requires PCCs to make arrangements for:

i) Obtaining the views of the community on policing of the area.ii) Gaining community co-operation with the police in preventing crime and anti social

behaviour in that area.iii) Obtaining the views of victims of crime in that area about matters concerning the

policing of the area.iv) Obtaining, before a police and crime plan is issued under section 5 or 6 of the Police

Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, the views of the people in that police area, and the views of the victims of crime in that area, on that plan.

v) Those arrangements must include, in the case of a police area listed in Schedule 1, arrangements for obtaining, before the first precept for a financial year is issued by the police and crime commissioner under section 40 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, the views of —

(a) the people in that police area, and (b) the relevant ratepayers' representatives, on the proposals of the PCC for

expenditure (including capital expenditure) in that financial year.

what does the future hold for csp s?

Documents