welfare implications of waste management

Upload: medha-malviya

Post on 09-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    1/27

    Welfare Implications of Waste

    Management

    Medha Malviya

    MSc Economics

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    2/27

    Objective of the study

    1) To make an appraisal of the various existingviewpoints on the need and importance on wastemanagement in India

    2) To focus on the relationship between wastemanagement and its impact on welfare of society

    3) To establish that the welfare implications may need

    not necessarily be uniform and that it can differ acrosscountries depending on the level of development

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    3/27

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    4/27

    Methodology

    Review of available literature- Reviewing the ongoing

    waste management practices along with relevant case

    study.

    Analyzing the waste management policies and their

    implications

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    5/27

    Literature Review

    L. Padma et al (2007)

    Rural waste management options are limited.

    The policies recommended:(i) village and settlement-based rural waste management strategies andinitiatives, and (ii) village bylaws.

    Thomas C. Kinnaman and Don Fullerton (1999)

    Incineration has been most successful where land is

    scarce for countries like Sweden, Germany, etc.

    A deposit or advanced disposal fee- at production orpurchase whereas a refund or subsidy to recycling for

    households that recycle or to firms that purchase

    recycled materials.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    6/27

    Chongwoo Choe and Iain Fraser (1997)

    Model for household waste management policy When household waste reduction effort (not significant)

    the first-best optimum can be achieved by using variouscombinations of an environmental tax on the firm and awaste collection charge.

    In the presence of household waste reduction effort asecond best-optimum is achieved because due to thehigher the waste collection charge leads to moreincentives for the household for waste reduction as wellas for illegal waste disposal.

    Community involvement is required for monitoring andenforcement of the policies.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    7/27

    R. Kerry Turner, J. Powell and A. Craighill

    (1998)

    Focus on role, efficiency and implementationof Green Taxes.

    Economic instruments can provide efficiencygains but in a political economy settings the

    efficiency gains might reduce due to multiple

    and conflicting policy objectives.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    8/27

    Case Study- Kampala City

    Objective of the study- To determine the economic

    value of an improvement in environmental qualitydue to an alternative household garbage collection

    and selection system for the households of Bugoloobi

    flats a suburb of Kampala City.

    Methodology- Contingent Valuation Method

    Results- Consistent with economic theory

    a) Kampala City Council (KCC) is inefficient

    b) Private service providers- Relatively Efficient

    c) HighWTP, improvement in welfare, increase in

    income

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    9/27

    Analysis ofWaste Management polices

    European Union (EU)

    Approach to waste management is based onthree principles:

    Waste prevention

    Recycling and reuse

    Improving final disposal and monitoring

    The Landfill Directive (April 1999) (Directive

    1999/31/EC )- Prevent or reduce as far as possiblenegative effects on the environment from theland-filling of waste, by introducing stringenttechnical requirements for waste and landfills.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    10/27

    In April 2006, Directive 2006/12/EC - ensure that

    waste is recovered or disposed of without

    endangering human health and without usingprocesses or methods which could harm the

    environment and shall take appropriate measures to

    encourage prevention and recovery- re-appealed by

    Directive 2008/98/EC with effect from 12 December2010

    Strategies focusing on:

    Prevention and recycling of waste

    Limit waste production

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    11/27

    480

    485

    490

    495

    500

    505

    510

    515

    520

    525

    530

    1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Municipal Waste Generated (kg per capita) EU-27

    Municipal Waste Generated (kg per

    capita)

    Source: Euro Stat

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    12/27

    Municipal solid waste (MSW) generation per capita

    in the EU had been increasing until

    recently, but now seems to have stabilised

    Slight increase in 2002, due to increase in the

    population size

    Stabilization- Due to either change in consumptionpatterns or improved waste management techniques

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    13/27

    Source: Eurostat

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    14/27

    Focus on minimising waste

    Recycling- Some countries have very high or high

    recycling levels on all waste streams. Relation between Economic Growth andWaste

    Generation

    Waste generation is still increasing proportionally with

    income, and economic and environmental costsassociated to land-filling are also increasing.

    EU has on its agenda that waste generation shoulddecouple (no waste growth) from economic growthwithin the EU in the future.

    Decoupling- linked to the main driving forces behindwaste generation: technical change, economic growthand household consumption.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    15/27

    Policies undertaken by member states-

    Germany

    United Kingdom-Waste Strategy 2007

    Emphasis is on recycling and reduction of waste at the

    source level

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    16/27

    Brazil

    Population is roughly the same number as the

    combined populations of France, the UnitedKingdom, and Italy.

    Relatively poor country, with an average annual

    income of only $3,570 per year and a poverty rate of

    22%.

    Much of the population lacks standard amenities

    Sao Paolo- 35% of sewage is discharged

    untreated, 76% of municipal solid waste (MSW)waste is disposed off in open dumps, and 10% is

    disposed of in uncontrolled landfills. Only 13% is

    placed in controlled landfills, and less than 2% is

    treated by composting, recycling, or incineration.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    17/27

    The national solid waste policy (PNRS, in the

    Portuguese abbreviation) will be implemented-

    approved on March 10, 2010.

    Emphasis on recycling

    Become equal the EU in relation to legislation

    concerning the solid waste. Focus on PNRS- Protection of public health and

    environmental quality, as well as at the

    adoption, development and improvement of clean

    technologies to minimize environmental impacts, andat the reduction of the volume of hazardous

    waste, amongst other actions.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    18/27

    Waste-to-Energy options for Brazil

    Not considered as an option

    Political, Economical and Technical barriers

    Recommendations- Municipal SolidWaste requires

    extensive changes before being able to benefit from

    WTE technologies, starting by collecting, assessing andspreading of reliable data and information. Institutional

    and legal reforms, R&D, training and public education

    programs, financing and funding

    mechanisms, modernization of technical, managerialand operational structures are also in order.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    19/27

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    20/27

    India

    In 2000, the MoEF introduced its Municipal SolidWaste Management Rules

    The MNES initiated the National Programme on

    Energy Recovery from UrbanWastes in 1995 to

    develop the waste-to-energy market Major problem- High Costs

    Recycling- New concept

    Informal sector plays a large role Low income- High organic content in waste

    W-T-E options for India

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    21/27

    Rapid urbanisation leading to increase in waste

    generated

    Increase in income- Increase in standard of living

    Illegal dumping- a major practice

    Unhygienic conditions

    Health problems

    Increase in economic growth leading to rapid increase

    in waste generation

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    22/27

    Problems faced by developing countries:

    IPRs- Not properly defined

    High costs No reduction at source level

    Limited financial resources

    Technical constraints Legal Constraints

    Social Constraints

    Institutional Constraints

    Economic Constraints

    Environmentally unsound waste managementpractices

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    23/27

    Results:

    Capacity development, changing role of

    stakeholders, and appropriate institutional settings Capacity development from the perspective of enabling

    factors for governmental intervention and national andregional industrial development for recycling

    Need for possible policy responses and internationalpolicy harmonisation to prevent a loop-hole of domesticrecycling mechanisms due to the expandinginternational material flow

    Community-L

    evel participation Reduction in tarrifs

    Decentralisation

    Strengthening of legal framework

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    24/27

    Properly define PRs

    Role of private sector, ngos, etc.

    PPP

    Defining clear roles at each level

    Education and awareness at the local level

    Supporting Strategic Planning and Follow-upImplementation

    Developing Self-financing Schemes An alternative waste management policy that concentrates

    primarily on reducing hazardous wastes could be arguedfor, when focusing on the environmental costs of wastegeneration for (no waste growth)

    To reduce waste intensities linked to firms, the policyinstruments introduced must bring about an introductionof waste preventing production techniques.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    25/27

    House-to-house collection of MSW should be

    organized through methods like collection on regular

    pre-informed timing and scheduling.

    Organizing the informal sector and promoting micro-

    enterprises are an effective way of extending

    affordable services.

    Landfilling restricted to non-biodegradable, inert

    waste and other waste that are not suitable either for

    recycling or for biological processing.

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    26/27

    References http://europa.eu/ Accessed on 12th November, 2010

    http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/business/regulation/31867.aspx

    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31999L0031:EN:HTML

    www.bmu.de/english/waste_management/doc/3432.php-All accessed on 12th

    November, 2010

    ww2.defra.gov.uk - Accessed on 9th November, 2010

    Final Report to Directorate General Environment., European Commission

    Financing and Incentive Schemes for Municipal Waste Management. Eunomia

    Research& Consulting Ltd

    http://eur-lex.europa.euAccessed on 18th November, 2010

    www.bdlaw.com/news-834.html Accessed on 8th November, 2010

    Coehlo, S.T. et al., Barriers to Implementation ofWaste-to-Energy (WTE)

    Technologies in Brazil, Zuan, D. et al., Improving Municipal SolidWaste Management in India- A

    Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners., World Bank Institute

    B. Perinaz., 2005. Capacity-to-Act in Indias SolidWaste Management andWaste-

    to- Energy Industries

    Eurostat

  • 8/8/2019 Welfare Implications of Waste Management

    27/27

    Fisher, C., and. Davidson, C.; Europe as a Recycling Society: The

    EuropeanRecycling Map.; European Topic Centre on Sustainable

    Consumption and Production

    Hall, D.,Waste management in Europe: framework, trends and issues