weirs classification

30
WEIRS Classification of Weirs: Design of Weirs:  Hydraulic Design  Structural Design  Floor Design  Detailed Drawings Solved Example WEIRS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm of 30 1 16:29 23-01-2016

Upload: dishku

Post on 26-Feb-2018

245 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 1/30

WEIRS 

Classification of Weirs:

Design of Weirs:

 Hydraulic Design

  Structural Design

  Floor Design

  Detailed Drawings

Solved Example

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 1 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 2/30

Objectives of Weirs in Irrigation Canals

Proper distribution of water carried by a main canal among the branchcanals depending upon it

Reducing the hydraulic slope (gradient) in a canal (if canal water slope is

greater than the allowable water slope)

Reducing head on existing structures

Collecting sediments at US of structures (sand strap)

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 2 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 3/30

Weirs for reducing water slope in steep lands

Distance between weirs

ac = L * Slope (before)

ab = L * Slope (after)

rise (R) = ac – ab

  = L {Slope (before) – slope (after)}

L = distance between weirs

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 3 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 4/30

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 5/30

Classification According to Position in Plan

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 5 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 6/30

Classification According to Dimensions of Cross Section

Classification According to Position of Down-Stream Water Level 

a)  Free- Overfall Weir (Clear-Overfall)

Q = 2/3 Cd B (2g) 0.5 H1.5

· DSWL is lower than crest level

· Q is independent of DSWL

· Q α H

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 6 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 7/30

b)  Submerged Weir 

Q = 2/3 Cd B (2g) 0.5 H1.5 + Cd B h1 (2gh2)0.5

· DSWL is higher than weir crest

Q α H, h , h

Classification According to Crest Length (B)

Design of Weirs

Design of Weirs is divided to 3 parts:

1 2

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 7 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 8/30

I. Hydraulic Design (determination of crest level and weir length according to head(

II. Structural Design (Empirical Dimensioning – check of 

stability(

III – Detailed Drawings

For proper Design of Water Structures:

Velocity of Flow:

Must cause minimum Loss in Head

Or minimum Heading Up

Flow of Water in a Channel is controlled either by:

§ A Weir or 

§ A Regulator 

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 8 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 9/30

Weirs: For lands having steep slopes

Regulators: For lands having mild slopes or flat lands

 I- Hydraulic Design of Weirs

1- Clear Over fall Weir 

Q = 2/3 Cd B (2g) 0.5 H 1.5

2 – Submerged Weir 

  Q = 2/3 Cd B (2g) 0.5 h21.5 + Cd B h1 (2*g*h2) 0.5

3 – Broad–Crested Weir 

  Q = 1.71 Cd B H 1.5

4 – Fayum Type Weir 

Q = 1.65 B H 1.5

5 – Standing Wave Weir 

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 9 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 10/30

Q = 2.05 B H 1.5

II Structural Design

1  The super structure

Theoretical Weir Profile

 Scour Length of Weir Floor 

Scour may be defined as deepening and widening of water channel under the

influence of the flowing water with high velocities.

The scour continues until the energy of the flowing water reaches the normal

channel energy.

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 10 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 11/30

Velocity distribution through scour hole

 Precautions against scour 

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 11 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 12/30

Floor of Heading Up Structures

 A weir on solid rock (impervious foundation) does not need long apron (Floor), butneeds sufficient width “b” to resist soil stresses.

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 12 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 13/30

 A weir on pervious soil needs length “L” to:

a) Cover percolation length,

b) Resist scour from falling water 

Definitions

Percolation is the flow of water under the ground surface due to an applied

differential head

Percolation length (creep length) is the length to dissipate the total

hydraulic pressure on the structure

 Undermining (Piping) is to carry away (wash) soil particles with flowing water 

below the ground surface causing collapse or failure of the above structure

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 13 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 14/30

 Determination of Percolation Length

To determine the critical head: (after which undermining  occurs)

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 14 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 15/30

1- Measure Q for different heads

2- H1 ----- Q1, v1= Q1 / A

H2 ------Q2, v2………. (k determined)

3- H……..Hn varies until Hcritical (soil particles begin to move)

Vcritical = Qcritical / A vcr 

vcr = k Hcr  / L = K icr L = K Hcr  / vcr 

k = vcr  L / Hcr   = Qcr  L / A Hcr 

Soil K (cm / min) Type of flow

Clean gravel 5000 – 50 Turbulent

Clean sand 50 – 0.05 Turbulent or laminar  

Fine sand + silt 0.05 – 0.00005 Laminar  

Clay < 0.00005 Always laminar  

Permeability : (hydr. Conductivity)

 Ability of fluid to move in the soil under certain head (dimensions of velocity)

v = k i

i = H / L

v α porosity + arrangement of grains

Seepage or percolation below weirs on previous soils:

- a weir may be subject to failure from under seepage

- water head will force (push) the water to percolate through the soil voids

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 15 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 16/30

- if water velocity at D.S. end is not safe (> v critical) then undermining occurs,i.e. water at exit will carry away soil particles

v = k I (Darcy,s law)

  = k dP / dl = k H / L

In practice: icr = vcr / k is unknown

Therefore we carry the 2nd experiment

e = voids ratio

e = vv/ vs

e = (1 – vs) / vs = (1 / vs) –1

Or 1+e = 1 / vs  or vs = 1 / (1+e)

Upward force = H * A

Downward force =

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 16 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 17/30

(net weight)

  = sp. Gr. Wt. Of soil under water 

  = ( -1) A L / (1+e)

for stability: H. A. = ( -1) A L / (1 + e)

H / L = icr  = ( - 1) / (1 + e) can be determined

Safe percolation length L = H / icr 

Or L = H / icr  (F.S.)

Values of i cr  & F.S.

Soil icr F.S.

Fine gravel 0.25 – 0.20 4 –5

Coarse sand 0.20 – 0.17 5 – 6

Fine sand 0.17 – 0.14 6 – 7

Silt & clay 0.14 – 0.12 7 – 8

If I > icr undermining (piping)

i.e. water has v >> to carry away soil particles

 Bligh Creep Theory

The length of the seepage path transversed by the water is known as the length of creep

(percolation length).

Bligh supposed that the dissipation of head per unit length of creep is constant

throughout the seepage path.

CB = Bligh coefficient of percolation C B = V/K

Percolation length is the path length from (a) to (b)

LBligh = CBligh . H

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 17 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 18/30

  L` = 2 t + L

If L` > LB  (Design is safe, no possibility of undermining)

If L` < LB  (Design is unsafe, undermining occurs, leads to failure)

L` = L + 2 t + 2 S1 + 2 S2

L` LB  (design is safe, no possibility of undermining)

L` < LB  (design is unsafe, undermining occurs, leads to failure)

Lane’s Weighted Creep Theory 

Lane suggested that a weight of three should be given to vertical creep and a weight of one to horizontal creep.

LL = CL H

Lane percolation length L` = 1/3 L (horizontal) + L (vertical)

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 18 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 19/30

L` = 1/3 L + 2 t + 2 S1 + 2 S2

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 19 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 20/30

 Distance between successive sheet piles

· Distance between sheet piles a-a and b-b d1 + d2

· Water percolation length takes the right path -----safe

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 20 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 21/30

Distance between sheet piles a-a & b-b < d1 + d2;

Water percolation length takes a short cut from a to b;

 Actual percolation length is smaller than designed

unsafe

 Design Head for Percolation

H = USHWL – DSHWL (1)

H = USLWL – DSLWL (2)

H = Crest level –DSBL (3)

Design head H is the biggest of (1), (2), and (3)

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 21 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 22/30

 Determination of Floor Dimensions

t1 = 0.5 – 1.0 m assumed

t2 is taken 2.0 m or t2 = 0.8 (H)0.5

t3 = t2 / 2 1 m

and l1 is assumed (1-2) H

L2 = is determined according to weir type (3-8) m

LScour  = Cs (Hs) 0.5

Or 

LScour  = 0.6 CB (Hs) 0.5

Hs = USHWL – DSBL – Yc

  = Scour head; Yc = critical depth

 & q = Q / B

where B is the weir length; q is the discharge per unit length

L` = l1 + l2 + ls + 2 t2

LB = CB . H if L` LB no need for sheet pile

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 22 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 23/30

If L` < LB unsafe; use sheet pile

Depth of sheet piles = (LB – L`) / 2

Sheet pile depth m

Determination of the uplift diagram

HD

h2 = H – t1/CB – l1 / CB

t2 = t / (γm) * Factor of safetyγ

t2 = F.S. [ h2 / (γm)] m.; γm = 2.2 t/m3

t2 = 1.3. [ h

2 / (γ

m)]

then t3 = t2/2 ≥ 1 m.

t3 = F.S. [ h3 / (γm)] m then the head h3 which corresponds to floor 

thickness t3

L3 = CB * h3 = x + t3 then get distance x

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 23 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 24/30

 Precautions Against Percolation

· The aprons are of plain concrete blocks of about 1.5 * 1 * 0.75 m deep

· For small structure blocks of about 1 * 0.75 * 0.5 m deep may be used

· The blocks are placed in rows with (70 – 100) mm open joints filled with broken

stone.

 An inverted filter of well graded gravel and sand is placed under the blocks in order 

to prevent the loss of soil through the joints

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 24 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 25/30

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 25 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 26/30

 EXAMPLE

 A canal (A) is divided into two branches (i & ii).The discharge of branch (i)=2Q of branch (ii) at all times. Two weirs have to be constructed at the entrance of each canal

.

Data :-

- Bed width of canals (i & ii ) = ( 23.0 & 8.0 ) m .

- Flood discharge of canal (A) = 105 cum/sec .

- Summer discharge of canal (A) = 45 cum/sec .

- DSHWL in the two canals = ( 11.00 )

- minimum water depth in the two canal branches = 4.0 m .

- Difference between H.W.L & L.W.L in canal(A) = .7 m .

- Submergence in canal (i) = 1/3

- Bligh coeff. of percolation = 16

- Bed level is constant in canal (A) and its branches .

- Q = 2 B H1.5

If a Board crested weir is constructed at the entrance of the two branches (i&ii) it isrequired to :-

1- Crest level of weirs ( i & ii ) .

2- Length of each weir .

3- HWL in canals (A) .

4- LWL in canal (A) & (i) .

5- Design of weir floor for canal (i) by applying Bligh method..

solution

Q A  = Qi  + Qii  & Qi  = 2 Qii

Q A  = 2 Qii + Qii

 At flood

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 26 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 27/30

Q A  = 105 = 3 Qii

Qii = 35 m3/s & Qi = 70 m3/s

 At summer

Q A  = 45 = 3 Qii

Qii  = 15 m3/s & Qi  = 30 m3/s

For branch ( i )

Qmax /Qmin = (2 B H11.5) / (2 B H2

1.5) = H12/H2

2

 H1/H2  = (Qmax /Qmin )2/3  = (70/30)2/3

H1/H2  = 1.527 & H1 = 1.76 H2  (1)

H1  - H2  = .7 (2)

From (1) & (2)

1.76 H2  - H2  = .7 H2  = .92 m

H1  = 1.62 m

h1/H1  = 1/3 h1 = 1.62/3

1- Crest level of weirs ( i & ii ) = 11 - .54 = ( 10.46 )

2- length of weir (i)

  Qmax = 70 = 2 B (1.62)1.5  B = 17 m

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 27 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 28/30

Qmin = 30 = 2 B (.92)1.5  B = 17 m

  B = 17 m

Length of weir (ii)

  Qmax = 35 = 2 B (1.62)1.5  B = 8.5 m

  Qmin = 15 = 2 B (.92)1.5  B = 8.5 m

  B = 8.5 m

3- HWL in canals (A) = 10.46 + 1.62 = (12.08)

4- LWL in canal (A) = 10.46 + .92 = (11.38)

h2/H2  = 1/3 & h2  = .92/3 = .3

 LWL in canal (i) = 10.46 + .3 = ( 10.76 )

Design of weir floor for canal (i) by applying Bligh method

BED LEVEL = 10.76 – 4 = 6.76

HD  = 12.08 - 11 = 1.08

HD  = 11.38 - 10.76 = .62

HD  = 10.46 - 6.76 = 3.7

  take HD  = 3.7 m

LB = CB * HD  = 16 * 3.7 = 59.2

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 28 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 29/30

 Assume L1  = 6 m L2  = 6 m

LS  = CS  (HS).5  CS  = .6 CB

HS  = 12.08 - 6.76 - Ycr   & HS  = 4.37 & LS  = 20 m

 Assume t2  = 2 m

L\  = 6 + 6 + 20 + 2 * 2 = 36

L\  < LB  unsafe use sheet pile d = (59.2 – 36) / 2 = 11.6

Use two sheet pile d =7 m & d = 5 m

h2  = 3.7 - .5/16 – 6/16- (2*7)/16 = 2.9

t2  = 2.9 * (1.3/1.2) = 3.1 m

t3  = t2/2 = 1.6 m > 1

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm

0 29 16:29 23-01-2016

7/25/2019 WEIRS classification

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/weirs-classification 30/30

1.6 = 1.3 * h3/1.2 h3 = 1.47

L3  = 16 * 1.47 = X + 2*5 + 1.6 & X = 11.92 m

RS http://osp.mans.edu.eg/tahany/weirs1.htm