€¦ · web viewpov – editorial, christian science monitor – massachusetts –1918. why...
TRANSCRIPT
The Question:Using the following documents, analyze responses to the spread of influenza in the early twentieth century.
Historical Background: The influenza pandemic of 1918–1919 killed an estimated 50 million people, many more than the total fatalities of the First World War. Approximately 20%–40% of the global population became ill.
Did you read the question carefully and underline the words that will help ensure that you fully answer the question?
The Main Ideas: Document 1 - POV – Medical Doctor’s Letter to Friend – 1918
- 100 deaths per day in U.S. Army base [Massachusetts]
- Worse than even battles in France
Document 2 - POV – Volunteer Nurse in Washington, D.C. – Letter
– 1918 - Many sick- Long hours to care for sick- Shortage of Nurses- Government encouraged people to stay home
Document 3 - POV – British Colonial Government Report for
Leone – 1918 - Most unfortunate were from out of town- Suffered from want of attention- Too many sick in a house- Or deserted by other residents
Document 4 - POV – Sanitary Commissioner’s Report – Madras,
British India – 1918- People from interior feared medical treatment- Believed epidemic was a visitation of the Hindu
Goddess Amman- Believed no treatment should be attempted
Document 5 - POV – Editorial, Christian Science Monitor –
Massachusetts –1918- Why should churches be shut down?- Church can fill people with peace- God can contend with microbes- And if God sends pestilence [disease] for the good of
the world, then why fight it
Document 6 - POV – Editorial – Brazil – 1918- Lamenting the ignorance of the Public Health
Agency- Not understanding the disease- Letting ships enter the ports
Document 7 - Two women recalling childhood in1918/1919 in New
Zealand - Radio Show – 1967.- Take food to people too sick to warm their own food- But not allowed to enter their homes – on doorstep- Most too weak to pick up soup on doorsteps- Fire to fumigate children to prevent spread of germs- Kept away from crowds- Never too books from libraries
Document 8 - British soldier served in East Africa – 1919- Natives made coffins - Rumor spread that it was The End- God determined to wipe humanity off the world by
means of a plague more fatal than man’s destructiveness
Document 9 - American resident of British Samoa - published in
The Evening Post, a New Zealand newspaper – 1919 - Paper says 8,000 have died but underestimated- Ship brought the sickness- Within four days it spread all over - People died everywhere- But kept out of American Samoa- Prevented boat from British Samoa from entering- Five days quarantine for boat
Grouping: Responses to InfluenzaFirst Group Second Group Third GroupTrying to deal with the sheer numbers of dead and dying from the epidemic
Government policies that aided the spread of disease or hindered it
Religious responses to the catastrophe
Document 1 –Doctor at army base – 100 a day
Document 2 –Nurse – long hours – caring for the sick
Document 7 –Children bringing soup to the sick
Document 6 –Ignorance of Public Health Agency in Brazil: letting ships enter the harbors
Document 9: American Samoa preventing ship from entering port
Document 3: Died from want of attention
Document 4:A visitation from the Goddess Amman
Document 5: If God sends pestilence, don’t fight it
Document 8: The End of Days
Thesis Statement:There were a variety of responses to the spread of influenza in the early twentieth century such as government policies that aided or hindered the spread of the disease, religious understandings and justifications for the epidemic, and health care professionals and individuals who simply tried to care for the sick and dying.
Missing Document:
Who is not present?- An African voice - The document describing East Africa is from a
British colonial report- Does this report adequately convey the experiences
of the colonial subjects?- Might they not have a different understanding of the
situation?
And do not forget Point of View Analysis:Who said it and why it matters that such an individual said it?