mscoates20112012.files.wordpress.com file · web view: if the negative reactions elicited by...
TRANSCRIPT
1. A definition of deviance as a negative reaction to behaviours, ideas, attributes.
1. A definition of deviance as a negative reaction to behaviours, ideas, attributes.
1. A definition of deviance as a negative reaction to behaviours, ideas, attributes.
2. Informal and informal as well as external and internal reactions and their relationship to processes of social control.
2. Informal and informal as well as external and internal reactions and their relationship to processes of social control.
2. Informal and informal as well as external and internal reactions and their relationship to processes of social control.
3. Issues in the definition of deviance:a. The tension between objectivism and subjectivismb. Connections between deviance and rarityc. Links between deviance and crimed. Voluntary and involuntary deviance
3. Issues in the definition of deviance:a. The tension between objectivism and subjectivismb. Connections between deviance and rarityc. Links between deviance and crimed. Voluntary and involuntary deviance
4. The importance of social context- audiences, actors, and settings- in the definition of deviance and crime.
4.The importance of social context- audiences, actors, and settings- in the definition of deviance and crime.
4. The importance of social context- audiences, actors, and settings- in the definition of deviance and crime.
5. The nature of criminal law:a. Politicalityb. Specificityc. Uniformityd. Penal sanctions
5. The nature of criminal law:a. Politicalityb. Specificityc. Uniformityd. Penal sanctions
6. The elements of criminal law:a. Actus reusb. Mens reac. Motive
6.The elements of criminal law:a. Actus reusb. Mens reac. Motive
6.The elements of criminal law:a. Actus reusb. Mens reac. Motive
7. Criminal defenses:a. Mistake of lawb. Mistake of factc. Justificationd. Necessitye. Consentf. Duressg. Provocationh. Intoxicationi. Automatismj. Insanityk. Entrapment
7.Criminal defenses:a. Mistake of lawb. Mistake of factc. Justificationd. Necessitye. Consentf. Duressg. Provocationh. Intoxicationi. Automatismj. Insanityk. Entrapment
Chunk 1: Introduction Question 1: How clearly established is the ‘thin line’ (top of page 8) that separates the ordinary from the
deviant realms? What is/are the force(s) that maintain this thin line?
Question 2:
Chunk 2: Defining Deviance Question 1: If the negative reactions elicited by deviant behavior serve as a force of “social control” (midway
page 9), are these social controls more effective and/or desirable than overt/force-driven social control mechanisms? In what types of situations are the reactions as social control more effective as social control (think contemporary and historically)?
Question 2:
Chunk 3: Issues in the Definition: Objectivism/Subjectivism Question 1: On the top of page 11, the author quotes Erickson and Becker saying, “deviance from one vantage
point could well be conformity from another.” Rephrase this quote in your own words and give examples that support it.
Question 2:
Chunk 4: Issues in the Definition: Deviance/Rarity Question 1: On page 11, the author suggests there is a “certain intuitive appeal” in the connection of the rarity
of an act and labeling that act as deviant. Explain this intuitive appeal and what might be the source of it.
Question 2:
Chunk 5: Issues in the Definition: Deviance/Crime Question 1: What are the consequences (positive, negative, neutral) in adopting the approach of “a few” who
include “virtually any socially harmful activity” in their definition of crime, using as a foundation the idea that “human rights and human justice” are “socially and not legally defined”?
Question 2:
Chunk 6: Issues in the Definition: Voluntary/Involuntary Question 1: What are the consequences (positive, negative, neutral) of removing or limiting the responsibility
of someone for their actions? Does this compromise their agency, and thus worth, within the larger society and with respect to their value as an individual?
Question 2:
Chunk 7: Social Context Question 1: If there is such significant lack of consensus over certain issues in a country like Canada, how do we
negotiate the differences of interpretation of deviant/non-deviant actors and behaviours, both formally and informally?
Question 2:
Chunk 8: Criminal Law: Politicality Question 1: For our evolving society, which is the most appropriate- the consensus or the conflict approach to
the purpose of law?
Question 2:
Chunk 9: Criminal Law: Specificity Question 1:Is it your impression that the Canadian system of law favours the crime control purpose while the
American system favours due process? What evidence can you present that both confirms and challenges this contention. Note: Consider the year of the source supporting this statement.
Question 2:
Chunk 10: Criminal Law: Uniformity Question 1: Is it reasonable to operate under the idea that “decisions made by criminal-justice personnel” can
be made “solely on the basis of legal factors…” (top of page 22)? Present evidence that both challenges and confirms that this a) occurs and/or b) is reasonable.
Question 2:
Chunk 11: Criminal Law: Penal Sanctions Question 1: Why has restitution been separated from other elements of the punishment? What are the
consequences (positive, negative, neutral) of this?
Question 2:
Chunk 12: Elements of Criminal Law Question 1: Why are intent and motive different? Does this separation assist in clarifying decisions of
responsibility/degree of punishment or, does it muddy the waters?
Question 2:
Chunk 13: Defenses Question 1: Rank the available defenses on a scale/spectrum of your choosing. Explain the points of reference
used to establish position on the scale/spectrum and why each defense falls where it does.
Question 2:
Chunk 1: Introduction
Chunk 2: Defining Deviance
Chunk 3: Issues in the Definition: Objectivism/Subjectivism
Chunk 4: Issues in the Definition: Deviance/Rarity
Chunk 5: Issues in the Definition: Deviance/Crime
Chunk 6: Issues in the Definition: Voluntary/Involuntary
Chunk 7: Social Context
Chunk 8: Criminal Law: Politicality
Chunk 9: Criminal Law: Specificity
Chunk 10: Criminal Law: Uniformity
Chunk 11: Criminal Law: Penal Sanctions
Chunk 12: Elements of Criminal Law
Chunk 13: Defenses
Chunk Checklist: List major points of the chunk Assign related chapter objectives Organise major points in a diagram
or graphic organiser Answer Question 1 Generate Question 2
Names:
Chunk Checklist: List major points of the chunk Assign related chapter objectives Organise major points in a diagram
or graphic organiser Answer Question 1 Generate Question 2
Names: