weaver et al-2016-journal of biogeography evolution of livebearing fishes of the genus limia...
TRANSCRIPT
ORIGINALARTICLE
Colonizing the Caribbean: biogeographyand evolution of livebearing fishes ofthe genus Limia (Poeciliidae)Pablo F. Weaver1,2*, Alexander Cruz2, Steven Johnson1, Julia Dupin2 andKathleen F. Weaver1
1Department of Biology, University of La
Verne, 1950 3rd St., La Verne, CA 91750,
USA, 2Department of Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado,
Boulder, CO 80309-0334, USA
*Correspondence: Pablo Weaver, BiologyDepartment, 1950 3rd St., La Verne, CA 91750,USA.E-mails: [email protected];[email protected]
ABSTRACT
Aim We investigate the origin and colonization of the West Indian endemicfreshwater fish group Limia. We evaluate the leading hypotheses for the origins
of West Indian life, including trans-oceanic dispersal, late Cretaceous vicari-
ance, and the GAARlandia land bridge at the Eocene/Oligocene boundary.
Location Greater Antilles, with extensive sampling in the Dominican Republic.
Methods We obtained DNA from wild sampling and the aquarium trade. We
sequenced three mitochondrial (12S, ND2 and Cytb) and two nuclear genes
(Rh, MYH6) for a combined molecular phylogenetic analysis to evaluate spe-cies relationships and the timing of divergence events between islands and the
mainland. We used Bayesian and likelihood approaches to build phylogenies, a
BEAST analysis to establish the timing of colonization, and R package BioGeo-BEARS to perform a historical biogeographical reconstruction.
Results Relaxed molecular clock results show that the ancestor to the WestIndian clade, which includes the Limia and Hispaniolan Poecilia, diverged from
a South American ancestor at the Eocene/Oligocene boundary. The basal
Jamaican species, L. melanogaster, split from the rest of Limia at the Oligocene/Miocene boundary. Cuban and Cayman taxa are sister to a diverse species
group from Hispaniola. Historical biogeographical reconstruction supported
the GAARlandia DEC+j model as the best fitting model for colonization.
Main conclusions Our results support a colonization model for Limia that is
concordant with the timing of GAARlandia and climate change during theEocene/Oligocene boundary. Limia colonization was most likely a result of
facilitated dispersal during a period of lower sea levels and shorter passage
along the Aves Ridge. These results are also consistent with other recent molec-ular clock studies of dispersal limited cichlids, toads and frogs, indicating a
growing body of support for the significance of Eocene/Oligocene climate
change for the historical biogeography of West Indian life.
Keywordscolonization, GAARlandia, Hispaniola, historical biogeographical reconstruc-
tion, Limia, relaxed molecular clocks, vicariance, West Indian biogeography
INTRODUCTION
After nearly two centuries of debate, biogeographical recon-
struction in the West Indies continues to be a contentious
issue, with wide disagreement over the relative importance of
dispersal–vicariance. The islands of the West Indies exhibit
exceptional biodiversity and are ranked in the top five of the
world’s most important biodiversity hotspots, with endemism
reaching over 90% in some groups (Hedges, 1996; Myers et al.,
2000). However, the island ecosystems are relatively depauper-
ate and some major mainland groups, including marsupials,
carnivores, lagomorphs, salamanders and most families of
frogs, turtles, and snakes are missing (Hedges, 1996, 2001).
These patterns are typical of isolated oceanic islands, in which
a few successful dispersers radiate in situ. Molecular clock
analyses across taxa, including some reptiles, amphibians, and
ª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jbi 1doi:10.1111/jbi.12798
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016)
mammals, show a pattern of random and recent divergences
from mainland sources (mostly from South America), concor-
dant with a dispersal model of colonization (see Hedges, 1996,
2001 for figure showcasing random colonization patterns).
The primary mechanism of dispersal for these groups is
thought to be a combination of large flooding events in South
America, floating mats of debris, and the prevailing north-wes-
terly oceanic currents (King, 1962; Vonhof et al., 1998;
Hedges, 2001; Glor et al., 2005). Dispersal continues in the
present day, as evidenced by a colony of iguanas (Iguana
iguana) arriving to the island of Anguilla from nearby Guada-
lupe in the wake of Hurricane Luis in 1995 (Lawrence, 1998).
Alternatively, the vicariance argument highlights the pres-
ence of organisms with poor dispersal abilities and relies on
the correlation between evolutionary patterns and geological
reconstructions. Advocates of West Indian vicariance bio-
geography envision entire ecosystems, trapped on drifting
island fragments, splitting from a proto-Central America in
the late Cretaceous (65 Ma) through plate tectonics (Rosen,
1975, 1985; Nelson & Platnick, 1981; Guyer & Savage, 1986;
Page & Lydeard, 1994). The presence of freshwater fish on
the islands of the West Indies has sparked much interest over
the years because of their diversity and endemism, as well as
their presumed limited dispersal abilities (Rosen & Bailey,
1963; Rosen, 1975; Rivas, 1986; Poeser, 2003), and they were
instrumental in the development of vicariance biogeography
as a discipline (Rosen, 1975). Previous taxonomic studies of
West Indian freshwater fish show that species on Hispaniola
and Cuba are polyphyletic; northern Hispaniolan species are
more closely related to eastern Cuban and Cayman island
species than they are to southern Hispaniolan species
(Rauchenberger, 1988; Burgess & Franz, 1989; Rodriguez,
1997; Hamilton, 2001). These patterns seemed concordant
with proposed geological models of island formation and a
late Cretaceous connection with the mainland (Pitman et al.,
1993; Pindell, 1994). However, the late Cretaceous vicariance
model has received much criticism, mainly because of a lack
of molecular clock support and the unlikely survival of life
in this region during and shortly after the late Cretaceous
bolide impact near the Yucatan peninsula (Hildebrand &
Boynton, 1990).
An alternative geological reconstruction that shows a more
recent land connection between the mainland and the West
Indies, is the GAARlandia model (Greater Antilles Aves
Ridge) (Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee, 1999; Iturralde-Vinent,
2006). In this reconstruction, any late Cretaceous land for-
mations in the Caribbean would have been inundated by
subsequent sea level change, and permanent land was only
present after the Middle Eocene (< 40 Ma). During the
Eocene/Oligocene transition (30–35 Ma), a rapidly cooling
planet caused global declines in sea level upwards of 60 m
(Haq et al., 1987; Miller et al., 2008). Coupled with general
tectonic uplift in the region, this may have allowed for
potential overland colonization of the West Indies from
South America across the Aves Ridge (Iturralde-Vinent &
MacPhee, 1999; Iturralde-Vinent, 2006).
One of the groups for which colonization routes is still
unknown is Limia (family Poeciliidae), a genus of livebearing
freshwater fishes endemic to the islands of the West Indies
(Rauchenberger, 1988; Burgess & Franz, 1989; Rodriguez,
1997; Hamilton, 2001). With 17 described endemic species
on Hispaniola and one endemic species on each of the
islands of Cuba, Jamaica and Grand Cayman, Limia is the
dominant freshwater fish group in the Greater Antilles (Bur-
gess & Franz, 1989). However, the historical biogeography of
Limia has not been critically assessed using molecular tech-
niques and the timing and mechanism of colonization for
Limia remains unresolved. Our hope is that by reconstruct-
ing the colonization of Limia, we will gain a vital piece in
the ever-evolving debate on the origins of West Indian life
and gain insight into other organisms with limited long-dis-
tance dispersal abilities.
Freshwater fish in the Limia genus provide an ideal oppor-
tunity to evaluate colonization hypotheses because of their
diversity and presence on multiple islands. Using Limia spe-
cies from Hispaniola (Dominican Republic and Haiti),
Jamaica, Cuba, as well as poeciliid species from the main-
land, evaluation of multiple divergence events is possible:
West Indies from the mainland (all Limia), Jamaica from
Cuba/Hispaniola (L. melanogaster split) and Cuba from His-
paniola (L. vittata split). We test the above colonization sce-
narios using a combined gene molecular phylogenetic
approach with a robust sampling of poeciliids from the
islands and the mainland, together with a relaxed molecular
clock analysis and historical biogeographical reconstruction.
The goal for this study was to test biogeographical hypothe-
ses of the West Indies through an updated multigene phy-
logeny of Limia. We examine three alternative scenarios, with
regard to Limia colonization. First, long-distance transoceanic
dispersal models, which predict colonization across the Carib-
bean sea by salt tolerant taxa from diverse mainland sources,
with subsequent evolution of the fresh-water clades (Myers,
1966; Briggs, 1984, 1987; Hedges, 1996, 2001, 2006). Second,
late Cretaceous vicariance models, which predict colonization
during the late Cretaceous (65–85 Ma) and persistence of
biota on incipient island fragments (Rosen, 1975, 1985; Nelson
& Platnick, 1981; Guyer & Savage, 1986; Rauchenberger, 1988;
Page & Lydeard, 1994). Finally, the GAARlandia model, which
postulates inundation of the incipient island fragments after
the late Cretaceous and until the Middle Eocene (< 40 Ma),
with range expansion of South American groups along a short-
lived, exposed Aves Ridge, which was created by sea level
decline and Caribbean plate uplift during the Eocene/Oligo-
cene boundary (33–35 Ma) (Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee,
1999; Iturralde-Vinent, 2006).
METHODS
Sampling
For an analysis of Limia diversity within the West Indies, we
sampled poeciliids from across the region, including wild
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2
P. F. Weaver et al.
collections and species we could obtain through the aquar-
ium trade. Wild collections were focused on the island of
Hispaniola to sample from the greatest diversity of poeciliids
and to ensure that each of the major clades of Limia was
included. A total of 30 Dominican populations were sampled
using seine and dip nets during trips in 2000, 2003, 2004,
2010, 2012 and 2013 (Fig. 1, see Appendix S1 in Supporting
Information). All appropriate permits for collection and
transport were obtained through local wildlife agencies. In
addition, we included the Haitian species (L. nigrofasciata),
the Jamaican species (L. melanogaster), the Cuban species
(L. vittata) and the Grand Cayman species (L. caymanensis),
which were obtained through aquarium stock at the Univer-
sity of Colorado (see Appendix S1). All specimens were pre-
served in 80% ethanol prior to DNA extraction, in
accordance with IACUC approval at the University of La
Verne. DNA sequences from additional outgroup taxa from
the mainland genera of Pamphorichthys, Micropoecilia, Poecil-
ia and Xiphophorus were obtained through Genbank (see
Appendix S1).
Molecular methods
Genomic DNA was extracted from ethanol-preserved caudal
peduncle muscle tissue following the manufacturer’s protocol
for the DNeasy Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). To
provide resolution at both the shallower and deeper
divergence nodes, we amplified both mitochondrial and
nuclear loci (Hrbek et al., 2007). Five gene fragments, three
mitochondrial (12S, ND2 and Cytb) and two nuclear (Rh,
MYH6), were amplified and sequenced for the 68 ingroup
individuals. Primer sequences for polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) are listed in Appendix S1.
Amplifications were performed in an Eppendorf Mastercy-
cler (Eppendorf, Westbury, NY, USA) under the thermal
conditions listed in Appendix S1. PCR products were puri-
fied using ExoSAP enzymes (USB Corp., Cleveland, OH,
USA). Purified PCR products were cycle sequenced using Big
Dye chemistry v.3.1 (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City,
CA, USA) and visualized on an ABI 377XL (Life Technolo-
gies, Grand Island, NY, USA). DNA sequences were edited
with Geneious Pro 5.6.6 and alignments were performed
with Clustal W (Thompson et al., 1997).
Phylogenetic analyses
Phylogenetic analyses were performed using both Bayesian
analyses (BA) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. Sub-
stantial discussion has revolved around the contrasting
approaches of multigene concatenated data sets versus con-
sensus gene trees (see Gadagkar et al., 2005; Degnan &
Rosenberg, 2009). To evaluate the utility of combining the
(a)
(b)
Figure 1 Locality map for populations sampled for this study. Limia is endemic to the West Indies, with one species occurring on eachof the islands of Cuba, Grand Cayman and Jamaica; the majority of the species (possibly 17) are found on Hispaniola. We sampledheavily from the south-west and central Dominican Republic where biodiversity is high. Additional species were obtained from Cuba,Jamaica, and Grand Cayman thru aquarium stock.
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
3
Biogeography of Limia (Poeciliidae)
nuclear and mitochondrial data sets, we ran preliminary
analyses on the mitochondrial and nuclear data sets indepen-
dently using Mr. Bayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck,
2003). Doubts about the utility of incongruence length dif-
ference tests (Barker & Lutzoni, 2002; Darlu & Lecointre,
2002; Alonso et al., 2012) lead us to visually inspect the
mitochondrial and nuclear trees for congruence. The mito-
chondrial and nuclear trees were overall similar in their
topologies, with the mitochondrial tree showing better reso-
lution near the tips and the nuclear tree showing better reso-
lution at deeper nodes (see Appendix S2).
We used PartitionFinder (Lanfear et al., 2012) to evalu-
ate the appropriate nucleotide substitution models and parti-
tion scheme on our combined data set. PartitionFinder
allowed us to evaluate various partition schemes, including
the fragment of 12S rDNA and each codon position indepen-
dently in all of the protein coding genes (ND2, Cytb, Rh and
MYH6). The optimal partition scheme for the data, as out-
lined by PartitionFinder, was a 7-way partition strategy
with the following models: subset 1 = K80+I for 12S and
MYH6 pos 2, subset 2 = GTR+I+G for Cytb pos 1, ND2
pos 1, subset 3 = HKY+G for Cytb pos 2 and ND2 pos 2,
subset 4 = HKY + I for Cytb pos 3, ND2 pos 3 and Rh
pos 1, subset 5 = JC+I for Rh pos 2, subset 6 = F81 for Rh
pos 3, subset 7 = HKY+I for MYH6 pos 1 and MYH6 pos 3.
Bayesian analyses were then performed on the combined
data set, using the seven partition scheme provided by Par-
titionFinder. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)
simulation was performed utilizing two independent runs,
using eight chains and 10 million generations, sampling
every 1000 generations. Convergence and stability of the runs
was detected using Tracer 1.5. (Rambaut & Drummond,
2007). The first 25% of each run was established as burn-in
and discarded. The remaining trees were used to compute a
50% majority rule consensus tree. Maximum likelihood trees
were built using PhyML (Guindon & Gascuel, 2003) as
implemented in Geneious Pro 5.6.6 and paup 4.0 (Swofford,
2003). Support for nodes for both methods was established
with 1000 bootstrap replicates. For the PhyML analysis, we
employed a general GTR+I+G substitution model, optimizing
topology, length and rate, and used the BEST topology
search strategy. In the Paup analysis, we used the seven par-
tition scheme as outlined by PartitionFinder. Tree search-
ing was performed with a branch and bound strategy, using
the FURTHEST addition method and bootstrapping was per-
formed using a random seed and branch and bound search
type. Trees were rooted with the Central American livebear-
ing species Xiphophorus hellerii after Hrbek et al. (2007).
Divergence time estimation
We chose single representatives from each of the main lineages
(34 in total) to maximize coverage of available gene sequences
and calculated divergence time estimates using a relaxed-clock
method implemented in beast 1.7.4 (Drummond & Rambaut,
2007). The data set was partitioned with the same nucleotide
substitution model as the seven partition scheme we used for
the MrBayes analysis, except that base frequencies were esti-
mated for all partitions. We used the uncorrelated lognormal
distribution model on the partitioned data set to account for
lineage specific rate heterogeneity. We used the Yule speciation
process as the tree prior. Because no fossil records were avail-
able for our taxa, we calibrated the tree based on the opening
of the Windward Passage, which split Cuba from Hispaniola
(L. vittata from the Hispaniolan Limia clade) 14–17 Ma (Itur-
ralde-Vinent, 2006). Additional analyses were run using an
alternative uniform prior distribution of 20–25 Ma for the
Windward Passage (Pitman et al., 1993) to evaluate the influ-
ence of this parameter (see Appendix S2). The estimation of
14–17 Ma is supported by the geological reconstruction of
Iturralde-Vinent (2006) as well as independent molecular
clock estimates for toads (Alonso et al., 2012) and cichlids
(Chakrabarty, 2006; P!erez et al., 2007; "R!ı"can et al., 2012). This
calibration point has also been used successfully in examina-
tion of the Cuban Girardinus group (Doadrio et al., 2009), as
well as the Central American Poecilia sphenops (Alda et al.,
2013). The analyses were performed with two independent
runs for 30 million generations, with trees selected every
10,000 estimations. We checked for convergence diagnostics
with Tracer 1.5 (Rambaut & Drummond, 2007) and com-
bined runs using Log-Combiner 1.7 (part of the beast pack-
age). The data were summarized using TreeAnnotator 1.7.4.
(part of the beast package) and visualized using FigTree
1.4.2. (Rambaut, 2009).
Biogeographical analyses
To investigate the historical biogeography of Limia, ancestral
ranges were estimated using the R package BioGeoBEARS
(Matzke, 2013); this allowed direct tests of the fit of dispersal
and GAARlandia models. For all of the hypotheses listed, we
applied the Dispersal-Extinction-Cladogenesis (DEC; Ree &
Smith, 2008) model and its modified version, DEC+j, whichallows for founder event speciation. Additionally, analyses
included a time-stratified approach that represents different
dispersal rates across time slices (see Appendix S3). Finally,
the relative likelihood of all resulting models were compared
using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC; Burnham &
Anderson, 2002). The best model was then used to estimate
the biogeographical history of Limia.
On the basis of the dated chronogram for Limia, we
pruned the tree to remove outgroups, but kept the sister
group comprised of the Hispaniolan Poecilia species, as well
as the closest mainland relative Pamphorichthys. We defined
five geographical areas occupied by Limia and its closest rela-
tives, including South America (SA), Hispaniola (HI),
Jamaica (JA), Cuba (CU) and Cayman Islands (CA)
(Table 1). We evaluated the likelihood of a dispersal model
versus a GAARlandia model of colonization, using time slices
that correspond with the proposed colonization pathway
applied to each model (see Appendix S3). We did not test
the late Cretaceous vicariance hypothesis, as the timing was
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
4
P. F. Weaver et al.
not supported by the divergence time analysis. For the dis-
persal model, our probability matrices reflect no land con-
nection between the Greater Antilles and South America and
the emergence of Jamaica during the mid-Miocene (after
Robinson, 1994). For the GAARlandia model, time slices
reflect the reconstructions of Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee
(1999) and Iturralde-Vinent (2006) and include facilitated
dispersal via a land connection between South America and
the landmass that included the proto-island fragments of
Cuba, Hispaniola and the Jamaican Blue Mountain terranes
from 35 to 30 Ma, followed by flooding and separation of
the Greater Antilles from the mainland from 30 Ma to the
present. Both models assume the opening of the Windward
Passage separating Eastern Cuba from Hispaniola at 15 Ma
(Iturralde-Vinent, 2006), as well as the formation of the Cay-
man Islands during late Miocene uplift, with a short-lived
connection to Cuba from 5 to 3 Ma (Jones, 1994).
RESULTS
Phylogenetic analysis
Our combined and concatenated mitochondrial (12S, ND2,
Cytb) and nuclear (Rh, MYH6) data sets yielded 2661 charac-
ters (1133 mitochondrial, 1528 nuclear). The resulting gene
sequences are available in GenBank, accession #s KX023907-
KX024245. The 7-way partitioned data set, which included
both nuclear and mitochondrial data, provided good resolu-
tion at both the shallower and deeper nodes of our ingroup
taxa with Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) of 0.90–1.0 andmaximum likelihood bootstrap (MLB) support of 80–100%(Fig. 2, Appendix S2). Overall tree topologies of the Bayesian,
as well as ML reconstructions from both PhyML and PAUP
were similar at all nodes. Support for nodes was very similar
across ML methods. A discussion of Limia evolution and spe-
cies relationships within the genus are included in
Appendix S2.
Divergence time estimation
The West Indies clade of Limia and Poecilia is shown to split
from the South American Pamphorichthys group during the
Eocene/Oligocene transition approximately 32.9 Ma (95%
highest posterior densities (HPD) = 21.6–48.8) (Fig. 3, node
A). The Jamaican species L. melanogaster split from other
Limia species near the Oligocene/Miocene transition 22.8 Ma
(95% HPD = 17.2–32.0) (Fig. 3, node B). The tree was cali-
brated by the splitting of Cuban L. vittata and Grand Cay-
man L. caymanensis from the Hispaniolan Limia clade
(Fig. 3, node C), which corresponds with the opening of the
Windward Passage and separation of the proto-island land-
masses of eastern Cuba and northern Hispaniola 14–17 Ma.
The Grand Cayman species, L. caymanensis split from its sis-
ter taxon, the Cuban L. vittata at 3.64 Ma (95%
HPD = 1.28–7.85) (Fig. 3, node D). The large clade of His-
paniolan lineages, which include several putative L. perugiae
populations (see Appendix S2 for further discussion), as well
as a sympatric population of L. sulphurophila from La Zurza,
and several unidentified groups, is shown to be a recent
diversification event at 1.76 Ma (95% HPD = 0.69–3.10)(Fig. 3, node E). The correlation of our molecular clock
analyses with the GAARlandia model is shown in Fig. 4. The
timing of the West Indies clade divergence (A, Fig. 4), the
isolation of Blue Mountains terrane of Jamaica from south-
ern Hispaniola (B, Fig. 4) and the opening of the Windward
Passage separating eastern Cuba from Hispaniola (C, Fig. 4)
correlate with estimates from the Beast analysis.
Biogeographical analyses
The AIC model comparison (Table 2) supported the
GAARlandia DEC+j model as the best fitting model. This
model was 4.8 AIC units lower than the second best model,
no-GAARlandia DEC. This result shows that a model that
includes a land connection between South America and the
proto-island fragments during 35 to 30 Ma is better fitted for
the clade comprised of Limia, Poecilia and Pamphorichthys
than a model where the colonization of the Caribbean islands
happened only through dispersal. Moreover, the model with
the founder event parameter (j) shows a significant lower like-
lihood score than its simpler version, which suggests that range
expansions alone are not sufficient to explain movements to
new areas. For example, the results show that one jump disper-
sal (or, founder event) is estimated to explain the current
range of L. caymanensis (Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION
Biogeography of Limia
West Indian fauna likely colonized the islands during many
events and through multiple mechanisms. Here, we show
evidence that an ancestor to the West Indies clade of live-
bearing freshwater fishes (including all Limia and the
Table 1 Current species distributions used to reconstruct thebiogeographical history of Limia in the West Indies. The speciesincluded in this analysis were: Pamphorichthys hollandi, from theSouth America Biogeographic region, Limia dominicensis, Limiaperugiae, Limia nigrofasciata, Limia zonata, Limia versicolor,Poecilia elegans, Poecilia dominicensis and Poecilia hispaniolanafrom Hispaniola, Limia melanogaster from Jamaica, Limia vittatafrom Cuba and Limia caymanensis from Grand Cayman.
Biogeographicalregion Species occurrences
South America (SA) Pamphorichthys hollandiHispaniola (HI) L. dominicensis, L. perugiae, L. nigrofasciata,
L. zonata, L. versicolor, Poecilia elegans,Poecilia dominicensis, Poecilia hispaniolana
Jamaica (JA) L. melanogasterCuba (CU) L. vittata
Grand Cayman (CA) L. caymanensis
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
5
Biogeography of Limia (Poeciliidae)
Figure 2 Phylogenetic reconstruction based on a Bayesian analysis of a combined data set for 88 individuals and five genes (threemitochondrial: 12S, ND2, Cytb and two nuclear: MYH6, Rh) with seven data partitions. Numbers above nodes represent BayesianPosterior Probabilities and numbers below nodes represent maximum likelihood bootstrap estimates from ML analysis. A version of thisphylogeny with labelled terminal nodes is available in Appendix S2.
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
6
P. F. Weaver et al.
Hispaniolan Poecilia) diverged from mainland taxa at the
Eocene/Oligocene boundary (32.9 Ma) (Fig. 3). The timing
of the split between the West Indian clade and the mainland
precludes a late Cretaceous vicariant origin or recent transo-
ceanic dispersal. In addition, our historical biogeographical
reconstruction showed the most likely model for colonization
is a GAARlandia model, including the colonization of Jamai-
can and Cuban Limia species.
The GAARlandia model predicts a short-lived (~3 Myr)
subaerial land connection between South America and the
incipient landmasses of the West Indies across the Aves
Ridge during the Eocene/Oligocene transition (30–35 Ma)
(Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee, 1999; Iturralde-Vinent, 2006).
This time frame marks an important transitional period in
the evolution of life on Earth, characterized by global climate
cooling and related changes in sea level. Transitioning from
the warm climate of the Eocene, the Earth experienced rapid
cooling of over 5 °C from the Eocene optimum to the start
of the Oligocene, accompanied by the formation of polar ice
caps and substantial sea level drops on the order of 60 m
(Haq et al., 1987; Miller et al., 2008). Supplemented by tec-
tonic uplift of the Caribbean plate, these conditions may
have resulted in either shallow banks or a land bridge con-
nection between proto-Antillean islands and the South
American mainland (Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee, 1999;
Iturralde-Vinent, 2006). During this time frame, much of the
Greater Antilles existed as a single landmass, with connec-
tions between eastern Cuba, north and south Hispaniola, the
Blue Mountains of Jamaica, Puerto Rico, and the Aves Ridge
south to mainland South America. The paleogeographical
model of Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee (1999) and Iturralde-
Vinent (2006) also predicts that after the lowest sea levels of
the Oligocene, the Aves Ridge land span was subsequently
inundated by rising sea levels before the Miocene (23.5 Ma),
severing the mainland connection and isolating several island
fragments, including the Blue Mountains of Jamaica (Fig. 4).
Further movement of Greater Antillean island fragments
acted to separate eastern Cuba from northern Hispaniola,
Figure 3 Chronogram of Limia and related groups derived from a relaxed molecular clock analysis of a combined data set (threemitochondrial: 12S, ND2, Cytb, and two nuclear: MYH6, Rh). Bars indicate the 95% highest posterior densities (HPD). Branch lengthsrepresent time since divergence and major nodes are indicated by lettered circles. Nodes A, B, and C represent significant splittingevents during the colonization of the West Indian livebearers and correspond with the geological timeline as illustrated in Fig. 4.
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
7
Biogeography of Limia (Poeciliidae)
opening the Windward Passage in the mid-Miocene
(14–17 Ma).
The results of our analyses follow rather closely several
events predicted by the GAARlandia model. Our best model
of colonization supports the split of the West Indian/South
American clade during the Eocene/Oligocene (32.9 Ma). We
also demonstrate support for the separation of Jamaica near
the early Miocene (22.8 Ma). Divergence of the Jamaican
L. melanogaster corresponds well with the proposed timing
of rising sea levels and the separation of the Blue Mountain
block of Jamaica from southern Hispaniola (Iturralde-Vinent
& MacPhee, 1999; Fig 4). This result is interesting in itself,
as many palaeogeographical models debate the independence
of the eastern Blue Mountain block from a large western
block (part of the Nicaraguan rise) (see Lewis et al., 1990;
Robinson, 1994). In addition, orthodox views of Jamaican
geology find little evidence for persistence of any aerial
Jamaican terranes prior to the mid-Miocene (Robinson,
1965, 1994). Other studies evaluating the relationships
between Jamaican and Hispaniolan taxa may help to solidify
this pattern and better explain the unique geological history
of the Jamaican terranes.
Implications and future directions
While our divergence timing results are concordant with the
predictions of the GAARlandia model, we do not believe
there is sufficient evidence to rule out alternative methods of
colonization, such as a combination of dispersal and vicari-
ant events, or short distance, stepping stone dispersal. As dis-
cussed by Ali (2012), there is little geological evidence to
support the notion of a contiguous land bridge from South
America into the West Indies during the Eocene/Oligocene
transition. Furthermore, rather than crossing a land bridge,
any of the taxa used for support of the GAARlandia model
could have also used short distance dispersal to colonize the
West Indies. In the case of West Indian freshwater fish fauna,
the ability of poeciliids and cichlids to tolerate, and even
thrive, in saltwater has been widely demonstrated both on
the islands and in mainland taxa (Myers, 1938; Burgess &
Franz, 1989). Other taxa that may have used the GAARlandia
land span for colonization, including megalonychid sloths
and other mammals, were also physically capable of crossing
over a saltwater barrier, especially with the potentially shorter
distances between landmasses that would have occurred dur-
ing the Eocene/Oligocene transition. Coupled with the
absence of less tolerant groups on the islands, including pri-
mary division freshwater fish and caecilians (Hedges, 1996,
2001), it is difficult to rule out ancient dispersal, as argued
by Heinicke et al. (2007) and their divergence time estimate
for West Indian Eleutherodactylus lineage at 29–47 Ma. The
alternative, in which fish were confined to the freshwater
connections of a GAARlandia land span seems less likely and
would not have restricted the colonization of primary divi-
sion freshwater fishes.
Whether GAARlandia was a true land bridge or not, the
predictions of the GAARlandia model as a corridor for dis-
persal should not be discounted. The main historical critique
of the GAARlandia model was the absence of a clustering of
divergence time estimates around 30 to 35 Ma. Until very
recently, DNA sequencing and molecular clock techniques
did not allow for fine scale resolution of divergence time
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 4 Inferred colonization by the West Indies (WI) clade(represented by Limia and the Hispaniolan Poecilia). Mostrecent common ancestor (MRCA) estimates correspond with keynodes from the molecular clock analysis in Fig. 3. Divergenceevents are in concordance with a three-part model of Caribbeanpalaeogeography presented by Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee(1999) and Iturralde-Vinent (2006). (a) The WI clade divergedfrom the South American Pamphorichthys group and reachedthe islands via the GAARlandia land span. (b) Rising sea levelsseparated southern Hispaniola from the Blue Mountains terraneof Jamaica, isolating the Jamaican species L. melanogaster. (c)Opening of the Windward Passage separated eastern Cuba fromthe Hispaniolan species.
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
8
P. F. Weaver et al.
estimates. A poor fossil record and lack of reliable calibration
points lead to further inconsistency. As such, those estimates
that were available were often crude approximations relying
on percentage sequence divergence and seemed to show a
scattering of divergence events through time (Hedges, 2001).
However, many of these interpretations have changed with
recent phylogenetic work utilizing a combined mitochondrial
and nuclear DNA approach, in combination with broader
sampling, more accurate calibration and relaxed molecular
clock methods (see Hedges, 1996 and the updated study,
Heinicke et al., 2007).
Many recent re-evaluations of West Indian taxa give esti-
mates for colonization that are now consistent with Eocene/
Oligocene colonization, including cichlids (Hulsey et al.,
2011; "R!ı"can et al., 2012), bufonids of the Peltophryne genus
(Alonso et al., 2012), some frogs, for example, Syrrhophus
(Crawford & Smith, 2005) and Osteopilus (Moen & Wiens,
2009), Polistinae wasps (Silva & Noll, 2015), and dispersal
limited spiders (Crews & Gillespie, 2010) and butterflies
(Wahlberg, 2006). Additional earlier work using fossil and
phylogenetic evidence also support GAARlandia colonization,
including extinct primates (Horovitz & MacPhee, 1999;
Davalos, 2004) and megalonychid sloths (Macphee & Itur-
ralde-Vinent, 2000; White & MacPhee, 2001; Davalos, 2004),
several bat groups (Davalos, 2004), as well as hystricognath
rodents (Woods, 2001; MacPhee et al., 2003; Davalos, 2004;
but see Fabre et al. (2014) advocating mid-Miocene disper-
sal). Even without concrete evidence for a subaerial land
span, it seems clear that the time frame of the Eocene/Oligo-
cene transition and its associated climate and
Table 2 Biogeographical reconstruction inferred in BIOGEOBEARS and the relative probabilities of each model calculated from theAIC weights. Models include dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis (DEC) for both GAARlandia reconstruction and the overwater dispersalmodels, as well as complementary models that allow for founder event speciation (+J).
Model LnL No. of parameters d e j AIC D AIC AIC_weight Relative LL
GAARlandia DEC !15.1 2 0.0097 1E-12 0 34.297 6.574 0.032 0.037GAARlandia DEC+J !10.9 3 1E-12 1E-12 0.5534 27.723 0 0.862 1
No-GAARlandia DEC !15.3 2 1E-12 1E-12 0 34.605 6.881 0.028 0.032No-GAARlandia DEC+J !13.3 3 2.01E-10 2.1E-11 0.0751 32.514 4.791 0.079 0.091
LnL, log-likelihood; d, rate of dispersal; e, rate of extinction; j, relative probability of founder event speciation at cladogenesis; AIC, Akaike’sinformation criterion; D AIC, AIC-min(AIC); AIC weight, Normalized relative model likelihood; Relative LL, Model relative likelihood.
Figure 5 Maximum likelihood, ancestralrange estimations of historical biogeographyof Limia under the best model, GAARlandiaDEC+j. Geographical codes: SA: SouthAmerica, HI: Hispaniola. JA: Jamaica,CU: Cuba, CA: Grand Cayman.
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
9
Biogeography of Limia (Poeciliidae)
palaeogeography have played a major part in West Indian
colonization and in shaping the remarkable present-day bio-
diversity.
A note on the taxonomy of Limia
As expected, we find support for the monophyly of Limia as a
group. Interestingly, however, we also show the closest sister
group of Limia to be the clade represented by the three His-
paniolan Poecilia species. Earlier studies have demonstrated
the sister group relationship between Limia and the Pam-
phorichthys group (Hamilton, 2001; Hrbek et al., 2007; Mered-
ith et al., 2010, 2011) but did not include the Hispaniolan
Poecilia species (P. elegans, P. dominicensis and P. hispan-
iolana) in their analyses. One consequence of this new phylo-
genetic arrangement is to further add to the confusion in the
taxonomic designations of Poecilia. Several studies have advo-
cated generic rankings for the taxa Poecilia, Limia, Mollienesia,
Pamphorichthys, Acanthophacelus and Micropoecilia (Rodri-
guez, 1997; Hamilton, 2001; Poeser, 2003), while others use
them as subgenera within the genus Poecilia (Meredith et al.,
2010, 2011). In either case, the designation of the Hispaniolan
Poecilia (P. elegans, P. dominicensis and P. hispaniolana) and
South American Poecilia (P. vivipara) as a group does not
accurately reflect evolutionary history and needs revision.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We give special thanks to colleagues at both the University
of La Verne and the University of Colorado for their input
and guidance. In particular, we thank Jerome Garcia,
Vanessa Morales, Roshan Gamage, Andrew Martin, David
Stock, Robert Guralnick and Dena Smith for the helpful sug-
gestions and support. We also thank our Dominican col-
leagues, Carlos Rodriguez, Arlen Marmolejo, Miguel
Landestoy and Marcos Rodriguez for assistance in the field
and in the lab, as well as the Ministerio de Medio Ambiente
y Recursos Naturales for permits. Additional thanks to the
referees of this manuscript for their constructive insight and
suggestions. Funding for this project was made possible by
the CU EBIO departmental graduate student grant, the CU
Museum Research grant and the ULV Faculty Research
grant.
REFERENCES
Alda, F., Reina, R.G., Doadrio, I. & Bermingham, E. (2013)
Phylogeny and biogeography of the Poecilia sphenops species
complex (Actinopterygii, Poeciliidae) in Central America.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66, 1011–1026.Ali, J.R. (2012) Colonizing the Caribbean: is the GAARlandia
land-bridge hypothesis gaining a foothold? Journal of Bio-
geography, 39, 431–433.Alonso, R., Crawford, A.J. & Bermingham, E. (2012) Molec-
ular phylogeny of an endemic radiation of Cuban toads
(Bufonidae: Peltophryne) based on mitochondrial and
nuclear genes. Journal of Biogeography, 39, 434–451.Barker, F.K. & Lutzoni, F. (2002) The utility of the incongru-
ence length difference test. Systematic Biology, 51, 625–637.Briggs, J.C. (1984) Freshwater fishes and biogeography of
Central America and the Antilles. Systematic Zoology, 33,
428–435.Briggs, J.C. (1987) The Caribbean connection. Biogeography
and plate tectonics, pp. 33–44. Elsevier, London.Burgess, G.H. & Franz, R. (1989) Zoogeography of the Antil-
lean freshwater fish fauna. Biogeography of the West Indies:
past, present, and future (ed. by C.A. Woods), pp. 263–304. Sand Hill Crane Press, Gainesville, Florida.
Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D. R. (2002) Model selection and
multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic
approach. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
Chakrabarty, P. (2006) Systematics and historical biogeogra-
phy of Greater Antillean Cichlidae. Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution, 39, 619–627.Crawford, A.J. & Smith, E.N. (2005) Cenozoic biogeography
and evolution in direct-developing frogs of Central Amer-
ica (Leptodactylidae: Eleutherodactylus) as inferred from a
phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 35, 536–555.Crews, S.C. & Gillespie, R.G. (2010) Molecular systematics of
Selenops spiders (Araneae: Selenopidae) from North and
Central America: implications for Caribbean biogeography.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 101, 288–322.Darlu, P. & Lecointre, G. (2002) When does the incongru-
ence length difference test fail? Molecular Biology and Evo-
lution, 19, 432–437.Davalos, L.M. (2004) Phylogeny and biogeography of Carib-
bean mammals. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,
81, 373–394.Degnan, J.H. & Rosenberg, N.A. (2009) Gene tree discor-
dance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coales-
cent. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 332–340.Doadrio, I., Perea, S., Alcaraz, L. & Hernandez, N. (2009)
Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the Cuban
genus Girardinus (Poey, 1854) and relationships within the
tribe Girardinini (Actinopterygii, Poeciliidae). Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution, 50, 16–30.Drummond, A.J. & Rambaut, A. (2007) Beast: Bayesian
evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary
Biology, 7, 214.
Fabre, P.H., Vilstrup, J.T., Raghavan, M., Der Sarkissian, C.,
Willerslev, E., Douzery, E.J. & Orlando, L. (2014) Rodents
of the Caribbean: origin and diversification of hutias
unraveled by next-generation museomics. Biology letters,
10, 20140266.
Gadagkar, S.R., Rosenberg, M.S. & Kumar, S. (2005) Infer-
ring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated
sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. Journal of Experi-
mental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolu-
tion, 304, 64–74.
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
10
P. F. Weaver et al.
Glor, R.E., Losos, J.B. & Larson, A. (2005) Out of Cuba: over-
water dispersal and speciation among lizards in the Anolis
carolinensis subgroup. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2419–2432.Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. (2003) A simple, fast, and accu-
rate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum
likelihood. Systematic Biology, 52, 696–704.Guyer, C. & Savage, J.M. (1986) Cladistic relationships among
anoles (Sauria: Iguanidae). Systematic Biology, 35, 509–531.Hamilton, A. (2001) Phylogeny of Limia (Teleostei: Poecili-
idae) based on NADH Dehydrogenase Subunit 2 Sequences.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 19, 277–289.Haq, B.U., Hardenbol, J. & Vail, P.R. (1987) Chronology of
fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science, 235, 1156–1167.
Hedges, S.B. (1996) Historical biogeography of West Indian
vertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27,
163–196.Hedges, S.B. (2001) Biogeography of the West Indies: an
overview. Biogeography of the West Indies: patterns and per-
spectives (ed. by C.A. Woods and F.E. Sergile), pp. 15–33.CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Hedges, S.B. (2006) Paleogeography of the Antilles and ori-
gin of West Indian terrestrial vertebrates. Annals of the
Missouri Botanical Garden, 93, 231–244.Heinicke, M.P., Duellman, W.E. & Hedges, S.B. (2007)
Major Caribbean and Central American frog faunas origi-
nated by ancient oceanic dispersal. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 10092–10097.Hildebrand, A.R. & Boynton, W.V. (1990) Proximal Creta-
ceous-Tertiary boundary impact deposits in the Caribbean.
Science, 248, 843–847.Horovitz, I. & MacPhee, R.D.E. (1999) The quaternary Cuban
platyrrhinae Paralouatta varonai and the origin of Antillean
monkeys. Journal of Human Evolution, 36, 33–68.Hrbek, T., Seckinger, J. & Meyer, A. (2007) A phylogenetic
and biogeographic perspective on the evolution of Poe-
ciliid fishes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 43,
986–998.Hulsey, C.D., Keck, B.P. & Hollingsworth, P.R., Jr. (2011)
Species tree estimation and the historical biogeography of
heroine cichlids. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 58,
124–131.Iturralde-Vinent, M.A. (2006) Meso-Cenozoic Caribbean pale-
ogeography: implications for the historical biogeography of
the region. International Geology Review, 48, 791–827.Iturralde-Vinent, M. & MacPhee, R.D.E. (1999) Paleogeogra-
phy of the Caribbean region: implications for Cenozoic
biogeography. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural
History, 238, 1–95.Jones, B. (1994) Geology of the Cayman Islands. The Cay-
man Islands: natural history and biogeography (ed. by M.A.
Brunt and J.E. Davies), pp. 13–49. Kluwer Academic Pub-
lishers, The Netherlands.
King, W. (1962) The occurrence of rafts for dispersal of land
animals into the West Indies. Quarterly Journal of the Flor-
ida Academy of Sciences, 25, 46–52.
Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S.Y. & Guindon, S. (2012) Par-
titionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes
and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecu-
lar Biology and Evolution, 29, 1695–1701.Lawrence, E. (1998) Iguanas Ride the Waves. Nature News,
October 15. http://www.nature.com/news/1998/981015/full/
news981015-3.html
Lewis, J.F., Draper, G., Bourdon, C., Bowin, C., Mattson,
P.O., Maurrasse, F., Nagle, F. & Pardo, G. (1990) Geology
and tectonic evolution of the northern Caribbean margin.
The geology of North America, volume H, the Caribbean
region (ed. by G. Dengo and J.E. Case), pp. 77–140. Geo-logical Society of America, Boulder, Colorado.
Macphee, R.D. & Iturralde-Vinent, M.A. (2000) A short history of
Greater Antillean land mammals: biogeography, paleogeogra-
phy, radiations, and extinctions. Tropics, 10, 145–154.MacPhee, R.D., Iturralde-Vinent, M.A. & Gaffney, E.S.
(2003) Domo de Zaza, an Early Miocene Vertebrate Local-
ity in South-Central Cuba, with Notes on the Tectonic
Evolution of Puerto Rico and the Mona Passage 1. Ameri-
can Museum Novitates, 3394, 1–42.Matzke, N. J. (2013) BioGeoBears: BioGeography with Bayes-
ian (and likelihood) Evolutionary Analysis in R Scripts.
Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BioGeo
BEARS/ (accessed 17 January 2016).
Meredith, R.W., Pires, M.N., Reznick, D.N. & Springer, M.S.
(2010) Molecular phylogenetic relationships and the evolu-
tion of the placenta in Poecilia (Micropoecilia) (Poeciliidae:
Cyprinodontiformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolu-
tion, 55, 631–639.Meredith, R.W., Pires, M.N., Reznick, D.N. & Springer, M.S.
(2011) Molecular phylogenetic relationships and the
coevolution of placentotrophy and superfetation in Poecilia
(Poeciliidae: Cyprinodontiformes). Molecular Phylogenetics
and Evolution, 59, 148–157.Miller, K.G., Browning, J.V., Aubry, M.P., Wade, B.S., Katz,
M.E., Kulpecz, A.A. & Wright, J.D. (2008) Eocene-Oligocene
global climate and sea-level changes: St. Stephens Quarry,
Alabama. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 120, 34–53.Moen, D.S. & Wiens, J.J. (2009) Phylogenetic evidence for
competitively driven divergence: body-size evolution in Car-
ibbean tree frogs (Hylidae: Osteopilus). Evolution, 63, 195–214.
Myers, G.S. (1938) Fresh-water fishes and West Indian zoogeo-
graphy. Smithsonian Report for 1937, 339–364.Myers, G.S. (1966) Derivation of the freshwater fish fauna of
Central America. Copeia, 1966, 766–773.Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca,
G.A. & Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conserva-
tion priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.Nelson, G. & Platnick, N.I. (1981) Systematics and biogeography:
cladistics and vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York.
Page, R.D. & Lydeard, C. (1994) Towards a cladistic biogeog-
raphy of the Caribbean. Cladistics, 10, 21–41.P!erez, G.A.C., "R!ı"can, O., Ort!ı, G., Bermingham, E., Doadrio,
I. & Zardoya, R. (2007) Phylogeny and biogeography of 91
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
11
Biogeography of Limia (Poeciliidae)
species of heroine cichlids (Teleostei: Cichlidae) based on
sequences of the cytochrome b gene. Molecular Phylogenet-
ics and Evolution, 43, 91–110.Pindell, J.L. (1994) Evolution of the Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean. Caribbean geology: an introduction (ed. by S.K.
Donovan and T.A. Jackson), pp. 13–39. University of the
West Indies Publishers’ Association, Kingston, Jamaica.
Pitman, W.C., III, Cande, S.C., LaBrecque, J. & Pindell, J.L.
(1993) Fragmentation of Gondwana: the separation of
Africa from South America. Biological relationships between
Africa and South America (ed. by P. Goldblatt), pp. 15–34.Yale University Press, New Haven.
Poeser, F. (2003) From the Amazon River to the Amazon
molly and back again. PhD dissertation. IBED, Amsterdam
University, Amsterdam, NL.
Rambaut, A. (2009) FigTree v.1.4.2. Available at: http://
tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed 9 July 2014).
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. (2007) Tracer. Available at:
http://beast.bio.edu.ac.uk/Tracer/).
Rauchenberger, M. (1988) Historical biogeography of poeciliid
fishes in the Caribbean. Systematic zoology, 37, 356–365.Ree, R.H. & Smith, S.A. (2008) Maximum likelihood infer-
ence of geographic range evolution by dispersal, local
extinction, and cladogenesis. Systematic Biology, 57, 4–14."R!ı"can, O., Pi!alek, L., Zardoya, R., Doadrio, I. & Zrzav!y, J. (2012)
Biogeography of the Mesoamerican Cichlidae (Teleostei: Her-
oini): colonization through the GAARlandia land bridge and
early diversification. Journal of Biogeography, 40, 579–593.Rivas, L.R. 1986. Comments on Briggs (1984): Freshwater
fishes and biogeography of Central America and the Antil-
les. Systematic Zoology, 35, 633–639.Robinson, E. (1965) Tertiary rocks of the Yallahs area. Jour-
nal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, 7, 18–27.Robinson, E. (1994) Jamaica. Caribbean geology: an introduc-
tion, 111, 127.
Rodriguez, C.M. (1997) Phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Poe-
ciliini (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). Copeia, 1997, 663.
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Baye-
sian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinfor-
matics, 19, 1572–1574.Rosen, D.E. (1975) A vicariance model of Caribbean bio-
geography. Systematic Biology, 24, 431–464.Rosen, D.E. (1985) Geological hierarchies and biogeographic
congruence in the Caribbean. Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden, 72, 636–659.Rosen, D.E. & Bailey, R.M. (1963) The poeciliid fishes
(Cyprinodontiformes): their structure, zoogeography, and
systematics. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural
History, 126, 1–176.Silva, M. & Noll, F.B. (2015) Biogeography of the social wasp
genus Brachygastra (Hymenoptera: Vespidade: Polistinae).
Journal of Biogeography, 42, 833–842.Swofford, D.L. (2003) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using
parsimony, version 4.0 b10. Available at: http://paup.csit.f-
su.edu/index.html (accessed 3 June 2015).
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. &
Higgins, D.G. (1997) The Clustal_X windows interface:
flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by
quality analyses tools.Nucleic Acid Research, 25, 4876–4882.Vonhof, H.B., Wesselingh, F.P. & Ganssen, G.M. (1998)
Reconstruction of the Miocene western Amazonian aquatic
system using molluscan isotopic signatures. Palaeogeogra-
phy, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 141, 85–93.Wahlberg, N. (2006) That awkward age for butterflies: insights
from the age of the butterfly subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepi-
doptera: Nymphalidae). Systematic Biology, 55, 703–714.White, J.L. & MacPhee, R.D.E. (2001) The sloths of the West
Indies: a systematic and phylogenetic review. Biogeography
of the West Indies: patterns and perspectives (ed. by C.A.
Woods and F.E. Sergile), pp. 201. CRC Press, Boca Raton,
Florida.
Woods, C.A. (2001) Introduction and historical overview of
patterns of West Indian biogeography. Biogeography of the
West Indies: patterns and perspectives (ed. by C.A. Woods
and F.E. Sergile), pp. 1–14. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the
online version of this article:
Appendix S1 Additional details regarding localities and
protocols.
Appendix S2 Phylogenetic reconstructions and calibration
schemes.
Appendix S3 Matrices used in the historical biogeographi-
cal reconstructions.
BIOSKETCH
Pablo Weaver is a researcher and instructor at the Univer-
sity of La Verne in southern California and recently received
his doctoral degree from the Ecology and Evolutionary Biol-
ogy Department at the University of Colorado, Boulder. His
interests include ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes,
especially West Indian groups.
The main interests of all authors include evolution, phyloge-
netics and biogeography, with a focus on island systems.
Author contributions: P.W. and A.C. conceived of the study.
P.W., A.C., and S.J. collected specimens from the field, and
along with K.W., P.W. and S.J. conducted the gene sequenc-
ing and phylogenetic analyses. P.W. and S.J. led the writing
and provided the artwork. J.D. conducted the biogeographi-
cal analyses. A.C. and K.W. provided laboratory space and
financial assistance. All authors contributed to the writing of
the manuscript.
Editor: Liliana Katinas
Journal of Biogeographyª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
12
P. F. Weaver et al.
View publication statsView publication stats