we searched for but found no echo in simultaneously recorded 4.8-ghz pulses

1
reflection distance, , and the change in the electron number density, , at the reflecting plasma boundary: •We searched for but found no echo in simultaneously recorded 4.8-GHz pulses. •The echo frequency dependence allows us to place a range on the product of the pulsar- •Synchrotron analysis leads us to believe that reflection from an exceptionally dense wisp may have caused the echoes we observed. Echoes of Crab Pulsar Giant Radio Pulses Jared H. Crossley, Timothy H. Hankins, and Jean A. Eilek (New Mexico Tech) Occasional “echoes” of Crab pulsar radio pulses have been seen on several occasions, and have been attributed to refraction/reflection from plasma structures in the outer Crab nebula. We report here the first observations of echoes from Crab pulsar giant radio pulses. The strength of Crab giant pulses (>1000 average flux) provides us with sensitivity to Introductio n This work was partially supported by NSF grant AST-0139641. The Very Large Array is an This work was partially supported by NSF grant AST-0139641. The Very Large Array is an instrument of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, a facility of the National Science instrument of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities Inc. Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities Inc. We observed Crab giant pulses with the VLA on 20 days between 1993 and 1998; only two days contain echo emission. Echoes are clearly visible in 42 of 78 pulses at 1.4 GHz on 1996 Oct 14 and 1997 Nov 26 (see examples, right). The other 36 pulses contain low signal to noise, complex microstructure, and/or a weak or absent echo component. The 1996 echo event is constrained in time to ≤4 days by observations 2 days before and after where no echo is present. Data No echo is seen in simultaneous 4.8 GHz data of the 1996 event -- we searched for both geometric and dispersive delays (see average autocorrelation functions, below). Pulses with and without echoes, 2 Pulses with and without echoes, 2 s s resolution. Primary and echo resolution. Primary and echo microstructure components have been fitted microstructure components have been fitted with one or two instances of an with one or two instances of an exponential scattering function exponential scattering function http:// chandra.harvard.edu Maximum echo flux is consistently 10% of max primary flux. Echoes are ~3 wider than the primary. Echoes have ~0.3 the primary energy. Analysis The fitted functions were then used to analyze component properties. Average degree of polarization is ~(17±5)% in both the primary and echo components. Results •The 1996 Oct echo event has the shortest lifetime (≤4 days) of any Crab echo event yet observed. This is the expected transit time for a Crab wisp (velocity ~ 0.3c). study the echoes at shorter time scales and higher radio frequencies than have been used previously. The echo frequency and time dependence lead us to believe that our echoes originate from pulse refraction in the wisp-like plasma structures close to the pulsar, near the pulsar wind shock. Observed wisp structures have sizes 0.1" to 0.4" ~ 200 to 800 AU (at 2 kpc distance). prima ry echo Primary-to-echo time of arrival difference is between 30 and 120 s. •The echo components are consistently broader than primary components; this is likely due to enhanced scattering within nebular plasma. •The echoes are less energetic than the primary components. Possible causes of energy loss are: partial reflection of the pulse from nebular plasma, reflection of only part of the pulsar beam cross- section by small plasma structure, or reflection from a curved plasma surface. no no ech ech o o no no ech ech o o Not to scale Pulse components (primary and echo) were each fitted with an exponential scattering function:

Upload: sadie

Post on 18-Jan-2016

21 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Echoes of Crab Pulsar Giant Radio Pulses. Jared H. Crossley, Timothy H. Hankins, and Jean A. Eilek (New Mexico Tech). http://chandra.harvard.edu. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: We searched for but found  no echo in simultaneously recorded 4.8-GHz pulses

reflection distance, , and the change in the electron number density, , at the reflecting plasma boundary:

reflection distance, , and the change in the electron number density, , at the reflecting plasma boundary:

•We searched for but found no echo in simultaneously recorded 4.8-GHz pulses.

•The echo frequency dependence allows us to place a range on the product of the pulsar-

•We searched for but found no echo in simultaneously recorded 4.8-GHz pulses.

•The echo frequency dependence allows us to place a range on the product of the pulsar-

•Synchrotron analysis leads us to believe that reflection from an exceptionally dense wisp may have caused the echoes we observed.

•Synchrotron analysis leads us to believe that reflection from an exceptionally dense wisp may have caused the echoes we observed.

Echoes of Crab Pulsar Giant Radio Pulses

Echoes of Crab Pulsar Giant Radio PulsesJared H. Crossley, Timothy H. Hankins,

and Jean A. Eilek (New Mexico Tech)

Jared H. Crossley, Timothy H. Hankins,

and Jean A. Eilek (New Mexico Tech)

Occasional “echoes” of Crab pulsar radio pulses have been seen on several occasions, and have been attributed to refraction/reflection from plasma structures in the outer Crab nebula. We report here the first observations of echoes from Crab pulsar giant radio pulses. The strength of Crab giant pulses (>1000 average flux) provides us with sensitivity to

Occasional “echoes” of Crab pulsar radio pulses have been seen on several occasions, and have been attributed to refraction/reflection from plasma structures in the outer Crab nebula. We report here the first observations of echoes from Crab pulsar giant radio pulses. The strength of Crab giant pulses (>1000 average flux) provides us with sensitivity to

IntroductionIntroduction

This work was partially supported by NSF grant AST-0139641. The Very Large Array is an instrument of the This work was partially supported by NSF grant AST-0139641. The Very Large Array is an instrument of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under National Radio Astronomy Observatory, a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities Inc.cooperative agreement by Associated Universities Inc.

• We observed Crab giant pulses with the VLA on 20 days between 1993 and 1998; only two days contain echo emission.

• Echoes are clearly visible in 42 of 78 pulses at 1.4 GHz on 1996 Oct 14 and 1997 Nov 26 (see examples, right). The other 36 pulses contain low signal to noise, complex microstructure, and/or a weak or absent echo component.

• The 1996 echo event is constrained in time to ≤4 days by observations 2 days before and after where no echo is present.

• We observed Crab giant pulses with the VLA on 20 days between 1993 and 1998; only two days contain echo emission.

• Echoes are clearly visible in 42 of 78 pulses at 1.4 GHz on 1996 Oct 14 and 1997 Nov 26 (see examples, right). The other 36 pulses contain low signal to noise, complex microstructure, and/or a weak or absent echo component.

• The 1996 echo event is constrained in time to ≤4 days by observations 2 days before and after where no echo is present.

DataData• No echo is seen in simultaneous 4.8 GHz data of the 1996 event -- we searched for both geometric and dispersive delays (see average autocorrelation functions, below).

• No echo is seen in simultaneous 4.8 GHz data of the 1996 event -- we searched for both geometric and dispersive delays (see average autocorrelation functions, below).

Pulses with and without echoes, 2 Pulses with and without echoes, 2 s resolution. s resolution. Primary and echo microstructure components Primary and echo microstructure components have been fitted with one or two instances of an have been fitted with one or two instances of an exponential scattering functionexponential scattering function

http://chandra.harvard.eduhttp://chandra.harvard.edu

Maximum echo flux is consistently 10% of max primary flux.

Maximum echo flux is consistently 10% of max primary flux.

Echoes are ~3 wider than the primary.Echoes are ~3 wider than the primary.

Echoes have ~0.3 the primary energy.Echoes have ~0.3 the primary energy.

AnalysisAnalysis

The fitted functions were then used to analyze component properties.The fitted functions were then used to analyze component properties.

•Average degree of polarization is ~(17±5)% in both the primary and echo components.

•Average degree of polarization is ~(17±5)% in both the primary and echo components.

ResultsResults•The 1996 Oct echo event has the shortest lifetime (≤4 days) of any Crab echo event yet observed. This is the expected transit time for a Crab wisp (velocity ~ 0.3c).

•The 1996 Oct echo event has the shortest lifetime (≤4 days) of any Crab echo event yet observed. This is the expected transit time for a Crab wisp (velocity ~ 0.3c).

study the echoes at shorter time scales and higher radio frequencies than have been used previously. The echo frequency and time dependence lead us to believe that our echoes originate from pulse refraction in the wisp-like plasma structures close to the pulsar, near the pulsar wind shock. Observed wisp structures have sizes 0.1" to 0.4" ~ 200 to 800 AU (at 2 kpc distance).

study the echoes at shorter time scales and higher radio frequencies than have been used previously. The echo frequency and time dependence lead us to believe that our echoes originate from pulse refraction in the wisp-like plasma structures close to the pulsar, near the pulsar wind shock. Observed wisp structures have sizes 0.1" to 0.4" ~ 200 to 800 AU (at 2 kpc distance).

primaryprimary echoecho

Primary-to-echo time of arrival difference is between 30 and 120 s.

Primary-to-echo time of arrival difference is between 30 and 120 s.

•The echo components are consistently broader than primary components; this is likely due to enhanced scattering within nebular plasma.

•The echoes are less energetic than the primary components. Possible causes of energy loss are:

•The echo components are consistently broader than primary components; this is likely due to enhanced scattering within nebular plasma.

•The echoes are less energetic than the primary components. Possible causes of energy loss are:

partial reflection of the pulse from nebular plasma, reflection of only part of the pulsar beam cross-section by small plasma structure, or reflection from a curved plasma surface.

partial reflection of the pulse from nebular plasma, reflection of only part of the pulsar beam cross-section by small plasma structure, or reflection from a curved plasma surface.

no no echechoo

no no echechoo

no no echechoo

no no echechoo

Not to scale

Pulse components (primary and echo) were each fitted with an exponential scattering function:Pulse components (primary and echo) were each fitted with an exponential scattering function: