waste management ottawa renewable energy workshop west carleton environmental centre april 8, 2011
TRANSCRIPT
Waste Management
Ottawa Renewable Energy Workshop
West Carleton Environmental Centre
April 8, 2011
• Natural anaerobic decomposition of organic waste in the Natural anaerobic decomposition of organic waste in the landfilllandfill
• Landfill gas is about 50% methane when it is producedLandfill gas is about 50% methane when it is produced
• Methane is the fossil fuel component of natural gasMethane is the fossil fuel component of natural gas
Landfill Gas: A Renewable Resource
Page 2©2011 Waste Management
Any technology or Any technology or applicationapplication
that uses natural gasthat uses natural gas
can also use landfill gascan also use landfill gas
Landfill Gas Collection
Fifth level 18pt Trebuchet
Page 3©2011 Waste Management
< Perforated pipe wells are drilled into < Perforated pipe wells are drilled into the waste, about one every 50 metersthe waste, about one every 50 meters
< The wells are connected to < The wells are connected to a header pipe. A blower a header pipe. A blower places a vacuum on the places a vacuum on the header pipe to withdraw the header pipe to withdraw the gas.gas.
< If it is not < If it is not used as fuel used as fuel for a beneficial for a beneficial use, the gas is use, the gas is simply burned simply burned off in a flareoff in a flare
Electricity Generation Electricity Generation - about ¾ of total industry- about ¾ of total industrySmall power plants at the landfill, or delivered by pipeline to Small power plants at the landfill, or delivered by pipeline to an off-site power plantan off-site power plant
Industrial Fuel (“Medium Btu”) Industrial Fuel (“Medium Btu”) – about 20%– about 20%Use in lieu of fossil fuel in steam boilers, cement kilns, heating, Use in lieu of fossil fuel in steam boilers, cement kilns, heating, leachate evaporation, greenhouses, etc.leachate evaporation, greenhouses, etc.
Natural Gas (“High Btu”)Natural Gas (“High Btu”) – about 5% (25 – about 5% (25++))Clean to natural gas specifications, compress, and insert into Clean to natural gas specifications, compress, and insert into a natural gas pipelinea natural gas pipeline
LNG/CNG Vehicle FuelLNG/CNG Vehicle Fuel – 3 – 3Clean to fuel specifications, compress or liquefy, and store in Clean to fuel specifications, compress or liquefy, and store in on-site fueling station or haul to off-site fueling stationon-site fueling station or haul to off-site fueling station
Types of Landfill Gas Projects
Page 4©2011 Waste Management
Year No. Year No.
1982 1 2007 3
1986 2 2008 3
2001 2 2009 6
2003 1 2010 2
2004 2 2011 YTD 1
2006 2
LFG to Pipeline Quality – Project History
Page 5©2011 Waste Management
Location Type Developer Output/Day Start Status
Puente Hills, CA CNG LA County 1,000 GEG 1993 ?
Bowerman, CA LNG Prometheus 5,000 LNG Gal2006Inactive
Sonoma Co., CA CNG SCS Energy 500+ GEG 2008 Pilot
Columbus, OHCNG FirmGreen 700 GEG 2008Inactive
Altamont, CA LNG Linde/WM 13,000 LNG Gal 2009Active
Dane Co., WI CNG Shaw 100 GEG 2011Active
Known LFG to LNG/CNG Projects
Page 6©2011 Waste Management
Typical Ranges
•Methane 45% - 55%
•CO2 35% - 45%
•Nitrogen 4% - 12%
•Oxygen 0.2% - 3%
•Moisture 4% - 6%
•H2S 20 - >1,000 ppm
•Siloxane 5 – 200 mg/m3
•NMOCs 20 – 500 ppm
Landfill Gas Constituents
Page 7©2011 Waste Management
Methane content is decreased as air is drawn into the collection system. The amount of air intrusion varies with the quality of the well field, priority of operations for odor control and compliance, moisture level of the waste, type of final cover, etc. Other constituent levels vary with the type of waste in the landfill
Product Specifications
Page 8©2011 Waste Management
Constituent
LFG NG CNG Fuel LNG Fuel
Methane 45 – 55% > 96% > 88% > 96%
CO2 35 – 45%< 5% < 5%
< 50 ppm
<5%Nitrogen 4 – 12%
Oxygen 0.2 – 3%< 0.2 – 0.4%
< 1% < 0.1%
H2S20 - >1000
ppm< 4 ppm < 16 ppm < 16 ppm
Siloxanes5 – 200 mg/m3
ND to No Spec
ND ND
Dry process: Applicable to lower sulfur loads
•Lower capital, high expense for replacement of media
Wet process: Applicable to higher sulfur loads
•Higher capital, lower expense
Biological: Applicable to higher sulfur loads
•Higher capital, lower expense
Hydrogen Sulfide Removal
Page 9©2011 Waste Management
•Adsorption of siloxane on activated carbon, activated graphite, or mixed beds comprised of alumina, silica gel, or proprietary media
•Typically multiple beds purged sequentially (pressure swing adsorption)
Siloxane Removal
Page 10©2011 Waste Management
Two Design Criteria
•Recoverability: the percent of methane recovered from the landfill gas and available for sale. Low recoverability results in a lower revenue for the project
•Purity: the methane concentration in the product gas that must meet the appropriate specifications
Multiple stages or multiple technologies are used to maximize recoverability and purity
CO2 Removal
Page 11©2011 Waste Management
•Zeolite selectively adsorbs CO2 via controlled pore sizes, so larger CH4 particles pass through
•Multiple beds which are consecutively filled and purged by depressurizing (PSA)
•High purity (97%) with a single stage
•Second stage may be used to increase recoverability
•Also removes about half the oxygen and 10% of the nitrogen, which are similar in size to methane
Molecular Sieve – Pressure Swing Adsorption
Page 12©2011 Waste Management
•Solution-diffusion through a non-porous membrane
•CO2 permeates quickly and pass through the membrane. Methane permeates slowly and bypasses the membrane.
•Single stage can have high purity or high recoverability, but not both
•Multiple-stage design combinations to achieve purity specification at acceptable recoverability
•Does not remove oxygen or nitrogen, but does remove H2S
Membranes
Page 13©2011 Waste Management
Many developers require the landfill owner to operate the gas collection system to maintain nitrogen contents low enough to meet the product specifications.
WM avoids this approach because of the constrictions placed on compliance and odor control.
Nitrogen removal adds significant capital cost.
Suppliers have developed adsorption beds capable of removing nitrogen
Nitrogen Removal
Page 14©2011 Waste Management
MOLECULAR SIEVEMOLECULAR SIEVE
SULFUR TREATSULFUR TREAT
MEMBRANE SKIDMEMBRANE SKID
LIQUEFACTIONLIQUEFACTION
LNG STORAGE LNG STORAGE
Altamont LFG to LNG
CH4 = 46%CH4 = 46%
N2 = 12%N2 = 12%
CO2 = 37%CO2 = 37%
O2 = 1.3%O2 = 1.3%
H2S = 100 ppmH2S = 100 ppm
H2O = 3.4%H2O = 3.4%
VOC = 0.3%VOC = 0.3%
High BTU FuelHigh BTU Fuel
> 96% Methane> 96% Methane
•Capital cost is $2500 to $4000 per scfm of LFG.
•Most projects require 1500 to 3000 scfm of LFG
•Total costs range from $5 million to $20 million depending on size, LFG quality, nitrogen removal, liquefaction for LNG
•WM’s cost for Altamont LNG plant was $15.5 Mil.
•Production cost is in the $4 to $7 per mmbtu
•Equates to about $0.60 to $1.00 per DEG
Economics
Page 16©2011 Waste Management
•LFG quality specs conflict with LFG collection system operations
•Cost to produce is about $4 to $7 per mmbtu, about the same or more than natural gas: why invest the capital?
•Most incentives for LFG are targeted to electricity
•Premium is available to renewable gas that is put in the pipeline and sold to utilities, who can claim renewable energy credits. Value may be more than fuel incentives.
•Most areas do not have widespread use of CNG/LNG vehicles or fueling stations
Barriers to LFG to CNG/LNG Development
Page 17©2011 Waste Management
Industry trend toward more CNG trucks, with fueling stations to support CNG fleet, resulting in a broader market for CNG sales.
Some geographic areas have higher retail cost of CNG due to local market pricing, transportation cost, and taxes.
There is value to controlling future availability and price of fuel
Emerging market in US for renewable fuel credits (RINs)
By meeting pipeline specs, LFG can be sold to CNG suppliers through existing pipelines, providing flexibility in delivery, production, and type of incentive
There appear to be opportunities for development in selected market areas with appropriate incentives
Considerations for Development
Page 18©2011 Waste Management