walking in indonesian cities
TRANSCRIPT
INDONESIAINFRASTRUCTUREINITIATIVE
Walking in Indonesian CitiesProf. Leksmono Suryo Putranto
IndII National Advisor for IURSP
Workshop #3 IURSP
Bandung, 12-13 February 2015
2
Minister of Public Work Regulation No. 03/PRT/M/2014 on Guidelines on Provision and Use of Urban Pedestrian FacilitiesvsDirectore General of Highways RegulationNo. 76/KPTS/Db/1999 on Guidelines on Pedestrian Facilities Planning on Public Road
3
Minimum Standard of Side Walk
4
Longitudinal Gradient and Transversal Slopes
•Maximum longitudinal gradient is 8% with maximum length of 9m followed by at least 1.2 m flat surface.
• Transversal slope is between 2% and 4%
5
Standard Width of Pedestrian Facilities
Land Use Minimum Width (m) Suggested width (m)
Residential 1.6 2.75
Office 2.0 3.00
Industry 2.0 3.00
School 2.0 3.00
Bus Station/ Bus Stop 2.0 3.00
Shopping/ Recreation 2.0 4.00
Bridge/ Underpass 1.0 1.00
6
Side Walk Adjacent to Bicycle Lane
7
Walkability in Yogyakarta (Rahmah, 2012)
•Most obstacles in side walks were illegal parkings, electricity/telephone poles and potted plants.
•Most pedestrian felt anxious when crossing the roads because high traffic volume, high traffic speeds and indiscipline drivers/ riders.
•Most pedestrian felt reluctan to use zebra cross because this facility was rarely found and required additional walking to cross the road.
8
Yogya People’s Expectation (Rahmah, 2012)
• Minimum side walk width of 1.5 m to accomodate two way pedestrian.
• Accessibility for pedestrian with disability.
• Accessibility for elderly pedestrian (flat side walk).
• Obstacles (including from hawkers) should be minimized.
• Shading from trees are required to encourage walking.
9
Problems for People Using Wheel Chair
• Abrupt change of surface elevation such as stairs and side ditch.
• Availability of ramp from road to side walk.
• Limited space to make turn.
• Uneven road or sidewalk surface.
10
Problems of People with Physical Disabilities
• High stairs
• Slippery side walks
11
Problems of Blind People
• Obstacles (trees, poles, oppened window).
• Availibality/Poor provision of guiding blocks.
• Unclear audio instructions in pedestrian crossing.
12
Problems of Deaf People
• Can not hear oral information in terminal/ bus stop.
• Can not hear audio warning such as car horn or sound of moving vehicles.
13
Problems of People with Mental Disabilities
Difficulties to find destination address in unfamiliar neighborhoods
14
Children Crossing Behaviour in Iran (Tabibi and Pfefer, 2014). Objective and Method
• The aims of the research were to investigate the effect of distractors on the pedestrian skills of children and adults.
• The pedestrian skill of deciding when it is safe to cross a road (decision-making skill) was assessed by a computer-presented simulated pedestrian task.
• The pedestrian skills of Grade 2, Grade 4 and Grade 6 children and adults were assessed in three conditions, without distractors, with on-screen distractors and with off-screen distractors.
15
Children Crossing Behaviour in Iran (Tabibi and Pfefer, 2014). Distractors
16
Children Crossing Behaviour in Iran (Tabibi and Pfefer, 2014). Results (1)
• Off-road distractors, whether visual or auditory, increased the starting-delay of all age groups.
• No significant difference between off-road-visual and off-road-auditory distractors for any age group except for Grade 6 children.
• Off-road-auditory distractors increased starting-delay more than off-road-visual distractors for Grade 6 children.
• Off-road and on-road distractors increased the number of missed opportunities for Grade 2 children.
17
Children Crossing Behaviour in Iran (Tabibi and Pfefer, 2014). Results (2)
• On-road distractors increased the number of missed opportunities of Grade 4 and Grade 6 children.
• The increase was greater for Grade 6 children.
• The number of unsafe crossings was higher in the condition without distractors.
• Overall, decision-making skills were vulnerable to distractors.
• The degree of vulnerability differed depending on age and the specific measures of pedestrian skill.
18
Children Crossing Behaviour in Iran (Tabibi and Pfefer, 2014). Starting Delay
19
Printed Materials Available for Children/ Parents Traffic Safety Education
• For children 3-5 years old
• For children 6-8 years old
• For children 9-11 years old
• Parental guide for 3-5 years old children
• Parental guide for 6-8 years old children
• Parental guide for 9-11 years old children
20
Socialization Materials for 3-5 Years Old
• Actually the basic materials are the same for all age groups.
• However in for the older age groups, feed back from children are gathered using more complicated method.
• In some cases there are additional materials.
21
Crossing Facilities
22
Holding Hands while Crossing
23
Crossing Procedure (1)
24
Crossing Procedure (2)
25
Safe Crossing Facilities
26
Unsafe Crossing Location
27
Side Walks
28
Unsafe On-Road Activities
29
Safe Off-Road and On-Road Activities
30
Recommended Colour of Clothing
31
Walking in the Rain
32
Alighting from Public Transport
33
Safe or Unsafe Outdoor Activities?
34
Additional Material for 6-8 Years Old Children
35
Railway Crossing (6-8 Years Old Material)
36
First Aid (6-8 Years Old Material)
37
Additional Material for 9-11 Years Old Children
38
Road Signs (9-11 Years Old Materials)