vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …mdonahue/talks/hmm2005-to1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729...

17
Vortex head-to-head domain walls and their formation in onion-state ring elements M.H. Park, Y.K. Hong, S.H. Gee University of Idaho, USA B.C. Choi University of Victoria, Canada M.J. Donahue NIST, USA Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.1/17

Upload: others

Post on 05-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formation

in onion-state ring elements

M.H. Park, Y.K. Hong, S.H. GeeUniversity of Idaho, USA

B.C. ChoiUniversity of Victoria, Canada

M.J. DonahueNIST, USA

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.1/17

Page 2: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

SEM image

Array of Ni80Fe20 ring elements,DO = 2 µm, t = 40 nm.

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.2/17

Page 3: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

MFM imageDI/DO: 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

500 mT

Hap

p

DO = 2 µm, t = 40 nm

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.3/17

Page 4: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

MFM imageDI/DO: 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

500 mT

Hap

p

DO = 2 µm, t = 65 nm

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.4/17

Page 5: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

MFM detail, DI/O=0.6

t = 40 nm t = 65 nm

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.5/17

Page 6: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

DI/O=0.6, t=40 nm

MFM image Simulation, Mz

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.6/17

Page 7: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

DI/O=0.6, t=40 nm

MFM image Simulation, ∇ · M

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.7/17

Page 8: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

DI/O=0.6, t=65 nm

MFM image Simulation, Mz

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.8/17

Page 9: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

DI/O=0.6, t=65 nm

MFM image Simulation, ∇ · M

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.9/17

Page 10: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Wall formation, t=40 nm

time = 100 ps 600 ps

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.10/17

Page 11: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Wall formation, t=40 nm

time = 1000 ps 1600 ps

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.11/17

Page 12: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Wall formation, t=65 nm

time = 100 ps 300 ps

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.12/17

Page 13: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Wall formation, t=65 nm

time = 500 ps 900 ps

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.13/17

Page 14: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Wall formation

Exc

hang

e en

ergy

(J/

m3 )

Vortex nucleation

Time (ns)0 1 2 3 4 5

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Dem

agne

tizin

g en

ergy

(J/

m3 )

Time (ns)0 1 2 3 4 5

5000

10000

15000

20000

Time (ns)

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

2400

Exc

hang

e en

ergy

(J/

m3 )

0 1 2 3 4 5

Vortex nucleation

Dem

agne

tizin

g en

ergy

(J/

m3 )

Time (ns)0 1 2 3 4 5

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.14/17

Page 15: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Energy comparisonst One Vortex Wall Two Vortex Wall

(nm)DI/O

Exch Demag Total Exch Demag Total

40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028

0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297

0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190 5496

0.8 1122 5071 6193 1653 4622 6275

55 0.6 1071 5871 6942 1437 5054 6490

65 0.6 - - - 1567 5500 7067

0.7 1484 6128 7612 1667 5533 7200

0.8 1561 6179 7740 1840 5698 7538

Energy units: J/m3

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.15/17

Page 16: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Similar effects reported for transverse/single-vortextransition:

• M. Kläui, C.A.F. Vaz, J.A.C. Bland, L.J. Heyderman, F.Nolting, A. Pavlovska, E. Bauer, S. Cherifi, S. Heun, A.Locatelli, “Head-to-head domain-wall phase diagram inmesoscopic ring magnets,” Applied Physics Letters,85, 5637-5639 (2004).

• M. Kläui, M. Laufenberg, U. Rüdiger, F. Nolting, L.Heyderman, H. Ehrke, R. Dunin-Borkowski, C.A.F. Vaz,J.A.C. Bland, S. Cherifi, E. Bauer, P.-O. Jubert, R.Allenspach, “Intermag 2005, ED07 Geometricallyconfined Domain Walls,” April 2005.

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.16/17

Page 17: Vortexhead-to-headdomainwalls andtheirformation …MDonahue/talks/hmm2005-TO1-4.pdf40 0.4 896 4729 5625 1221 3806 5028 0.5 894 4770 5664 1241 4056 5297 0.6 921 4796 5718 1306 4190

Summary• Good agreement between MFM and

micromagnetics for Ni80Fe20 ring elements.• Single-vortex head-to-head walls observed in

40 nm elements.• Double-vortex head-to-head walls observed

in 65 nm elements.• Micromagnetics indicate double-vortex wall

has lower energy in 40 nm element, but isinaccessible.

• Nucleation event evident in micromagneticsimulations as spike in exchange energy.

Vortex head-to-head domain wallsand their formationin onion-state ring elements – p.17/17